`
`Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017
`
`Page 1
`
`·1· · ·UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`· · · · BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`·2· ·___________________________________________
`
`·3· ·VALVE CORPORATION,
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · Case IPR2016-00949
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·IPR2016-00948
`·5· · · · · · Petitioner,
`· · ·v.
`·6
`· · ·IRONBURG INVENTIONS, LTD.,
`·7
`· · · · · · · ·Patent Owner.
`·8· ·___________________________________________
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`· · · · · · · ·EXPERT TESTIMONY OF
`15
`· · · · · · · · ·DR. GLEN STEVICK
`16
`· · · · · · · · · · ·VOLUME II
`17
`· · · · · · · · · March 15, 2017
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21· · · · · PRO-SYSTEMS COURT REPORTING
`· · · · · · ·4305 BRYANT AVENUE SOUTH
`22· · · · · MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55409
`· · · · · · · · · ·(612) 823-2100
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100
`PETITIONER VALVE CORPORATION, EX. 1023 p. 001
`IPR2016-00948 - 00949
`VALVE CORP. v. IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
`
`IRONBURG EX2025, Page 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017
`
`Page 2
`
`·1· · · · · · The expert testimony of
`
`·2· ·DR. GLEN STEVICK, Volume II, taken on
`
`·3· ·March 15, 2017, at the DoubleTree by
`
`·4· ·Hilton Hotel, 300 Canal Street,
`
`·5· ·New Orleans, Louisiana, commencing at
`
`·6· ·approximately 9:00 a.m., before
`
`·7· ·Alexis Jensen, a Registered Professional
`
`·8· ·Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter and
`
`·9· ·a Notary Public in and for the State of
`
`10· ·Minnesota.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`· · · · · · · A P P E A R A N C E S
`14
`
`15
`· · · · · BARCELO, HARRISON & WALKER, LLP
`16· · · · By:· MR. REYNALDO C. BARCELO, P.E.
`· · · · · 2901 West Coast Highway
`17· · · · Suite 200
`· · · · · Newport Beach, California· 92663
`18· · · · ·Phone:· 949.340.9736
`· · · · · Email:· rey@bhiplaw.com
`19· · · · On Behalf of Petitioner
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100
`PETITIONER VALVE CORPORATION, EX. 1023 p. 002
`IPR2016-00948 - 00949
`VALVE CORP. v. IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
`
`IRONBURG EX2025, Page 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017
`
`Page 3
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES (CONT'D):
`
`·2
`
`·3· · · · MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
`· · · · · By:· MR. EHAB SAMUEL
`·4· · · · 11355 W. Olympic Boulevard
`· · · · · Los Angeles, California· 90064
`·5· · · · Phone:· 310.312.4243
`· · · · · Email:· esamuel@manatt.com
`·6· · · · On Behalf of Patent Owner
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`
`Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100
`PETITIONER VALVE CORPORATION, EX. 1023 p. 003
`IPR2016-00948 - 00949
`VALVE CORP. v. IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
`
`IRONBURG EX2025, Page 3
`
`
`
`http://www.yeslaw.net/help
`
`
`
`Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017
`
`Page 134
`
`·1· · · ·held in and operated by both hands of the
`
`·2· · · ·user, correct?
`
`·3· ·A.· Yes.
`
`·4· ·Q.· And paragraph 38, you had a definition for
`
`·5· · · ·"handheld"?
`
`·6· ·A.· Yes, as using the word "supported," yes.
`
`·7· ·Q.· And what was that definition?
`
`·8· ·A.· That a handheld controller is held in one's
`
`·9· · · ·hands.
`
`10· ·Q.· No, what's -- not the controller, but what's
`
`11· · · ·just the definition of "handheld" in
`
`12· · · ·paragraph 38?
`
`13· ·A.· You're holding it in your hands and it's
`
`14· · · ·supported as shown in the figures.
`
`15· ·Q.· Paragraph 38.
`
`16· ·A.· Oh, I'm looking at the 949.· So, you want to
`
`17· · · ·look at the --
`
`18· ·Q.· Yeah, we're talking about the '525, 948.
`
`19· ·A.· Yeah, no problem.· Sure.· It's probably
`
`20· · · ·similar.· Let's see.· Okay.· Paragraph 38,
`
`21· · · ·yes, you're right, I did put a Webster
`
`22· · · ·dictionary, and "handheld" is held in the
`
`23· · · ·hand, "to be operated while being held in
`
`24· · · ·the hand."
`
`25· ·Q.· Now, do the terms "held" and "held in" have
`
`
`Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100
`PETITIONER VALVE CORPORATION, EX. 1023 p. 134
`IPR2016-00948 - 00949
`VALVE CORP. v. IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
`
`YVer1f
`
`IRONBURG EX2025, Page 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017
`
`Page 135
`
`·1· · · ·different meanings to a person of skill in
`
`·2· · · ·the art on or before the priority filing
`
`·3· · · ·date of June 17, 2011?
`
`·4· · · · · · · · MR. BARCELO:· Objection, form.
`
`·5· · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Well, holding
`
`·6· · · ·something or grasping something is different
`
`·7· · · ·than holding in your hand.· Much like a
`
`·8· · · ·railing, you hold on to a railing, but
`
`·9· · · ·you're not holding it in your hand.
`
`10· · · ·BY MR. SAMUEL:
`
`11· ·Q.· So, the operative word or distinction is the
`
`12· · · ·word "in"?
`
`13· ·A.· Yes, or supported would be another way to
`
`14· · · ·say it.
`
`15· ·Q.· Okay.· And in Claim 1 of the '525 Patent, in
`
`16· · · ·addition to the use of the handheld
`
`17· · · ·controller language in the preamble, it also
`
`18· · · ·states, "held in the hand," in the body of
`
`19· · · ·the claim; is that correct?
`
`20· ·A.· This is Claim 1 of the '525?
`
`21· ·Q.· Yes.
`
`http://www.yeslaw.net/help
`
`22· ·A.· Well, it says "a handheld controller."
`
`23· ·Q.· Look at line 4 -- Column 4, line 47.
`
`24· ·A.· I'm getting there:· "To be held in the hand
`
`25· · · ·of a user such that the user's thumb is
`
`
`Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100
`PETITIONER VALVE CORPORATION, EX. 1023 p. 135
`IPR2016-00948 - 00949
`VALVE CORP. v. IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
`
`YVer1f
`
`IRONBURG EX2025, Page 5
`
`
`
`http://www.yeslaw.net/help
`
`
`
`Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017Stevick, Dr. Glen - Volume II -· 03/15/2017
`
`Page 136
`
`·1· · · ·positioned to operate the front controller."
`
`·2· ·Q.· Okay.· And is your position also that the
`
`·3· · · ·video game controller of the '770 Patent
`
`·4· · · ·must also be held in the hands?
`
`·5· ·A.· Yes.
`
`·6· ·Q.· Let's talk about switch mechanisms.
`
`·7· ·A.· Sure.
`
`·8· ·Q.· Can you give me an example of what minimum
`
`·9· · · ·level of education or experience that
`
`10· · · ·someone would have to know about the
`
`11· · · ·structure of the switch mechanism?
`
`12· · · · · · · · MR. BARCELO:· Objection, form.
`
`13· · · · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Well, it can be
`
`14· · · ·pre-graduation from high school, as most of
`
`15· · · ·us in high school who took electronics and
`
`16· · · ·shop, we all knew how a switch worked, we'd
`
`17· · · ·taken several apart; and so, we knew what a
`
`18· · · ·switch mechanism was and what they did.
`
`19· · · ·BY MR. SAMUEL:
`
`20· ·Q.· So, would a POSITA know what is the
`
`21· · · ·structure of a switch mechanism?
`
`22· ·A.· Yes.
`
`23· ·Q.· Would a POSITA know what the structure of a
`
`24· · · ·switch mechanism is even if it's not
`
`25· · · ·disclosed in the '770 Patent?
`
`
`Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100Pro-Systems Court Reporting· · · ·612.823.2100
`PETITIONER VALVE CORPORATION, EX. 1023 p. 136
`IPR2016-00948 - 00949
`VALVE CORP. v. IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD.
`
`YVer1f
`
`IRONBURG EX2025, Page 6
`
`