`
`
`JS-6
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`PROGRESSIVE SEMICONDUCTOR
`CASE NO. 8:15-cv-02076-JLS-JCx
`SOLUTIONS LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
`PREJUDICE
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`vs.
`BROADCOM CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
` Page 1 of 2
`
`BROADCOM EXHIBIT 1012
`Broadcom Corp. Progressive Semiconductor Solutions LLP
`IPR2017-00090
`
`
`
`Case 8:15-cv-02076-JLS-JC Document 39 Filed 01/17/17 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:143
`
`
`Recognizing the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Progressive
`
`Semiconductor Solutions LLC (“Progressive Semiconductor”) and Defendant
`Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) in accordance with a certain agreement
`between them, it is hereby
`
`ORDERED that the claims, causes of action, and counterclaims asserted
`herein by Progressive Semiconductor and Broadcom against each other be, and
`hereby are, dismissed with prejudice. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a
`release or discharge of any claim Progressive Semiconductor has or may have in
`the future against any other asserted infringer of the patent-in-suit apart from
`Broadcom and the other parties covered by the certain agreement, or as a waiver by
`Broadcom of its right to assert defenses or counterclaims in a future suit, including
`based on invalidity or unenforceability of the patent-in-suit. It is
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Progressive Semiconductor and Broadcom shall
`bear their own attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs.
`
`
`Dated: January 17, 2017
`
`________________________________
`
` HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
` United States District Judge
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`BROADCOM EXHIBIT 1012
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
