throbber
Cook, Brian
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:12 PM
`Miller, Mark E.; Trials
`pinkus@fsclaw.com; wojcio@fsclaw.com; Drummond Hansen, Melody; Cook, Brian
`RE: IPR2017-00090 - Request for Authorization to File Motion to Terminate
`
`Counsel,
`
`Pursuant to counsels’ request and based upon their representation that the parties have entered into a confidential
`agreement that resolves all of the disputes between them, the Panel authorizes the parties to file a joint motion to
`terminate this proceeding. The joint motion shall be filed no later than Tuesday, January 31, 2017. The parties are
`reminded that, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b), an agreement to terminate an inter partes review proceeding shall be in
`writing and a true copy of the agreement shall be filed with the Board. See also 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b) (indicating the
`same). If the parties wish the Board to maintain such an agreement as “business confidential information,” they may
`request that the Board do so in a writing accompanying the joint motion pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`Thanks,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`
`From: Miller, Mark E. [mailto:markmiller@omm.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:05 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: pinkus@fsclaw.com; wojcio@fsclaw.com; Drummond Hansen, Melody <mdrummondhansen@omm.com>; Cook,
`Brian <bcook@omm.com>
`Subject: IPR2017-00090 - Request for Authorization to File Motion to Terminate
`
`Honorable Board Members:
`
` I
`
` am lead counsel for Petitioner in IPR2017-00090.
`
`
`Counsel for the parties in IPR2017-00090 hereby advise the Board that a settlement of the
`dispute between the parties has been reached, and a stipulation of dismissal was filed in the
`underlying litigation in the District Court. Pursuant to the settlement, the parties hereby
`request authorization to submit a joint motion to terminate IPR2017-00090, together with a
`request to keep the settlement agreement separate and confidential. Counsel for both parties are
`aware of the requirements for the motion, including the requirement to submit a copy of the
`settlement agreement. Accordingly, a call with the Board prior to submission of the motion to
`terminate and accompanying request to keep separate may not be necessary, but counsel for both
`parties are generally available for a conference call if requested by the Board.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`1
`
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`BROADCOM EXHIBIT 1010
`Broadcom Corp. v. Progressive Semiconductor Solutions LLP
`IPR2017-00090
`
`

`

`
`O’Melveny
`Mark E. Miller
`Partner
`markmiller@omm.com
`O: +1-415-984-8904
`
`O’Melveny & Myers LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Website | LinkedIn |
`This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers
`LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read,
`copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the
`sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message.
`
`
`2
`
`BROADCOM EXHIBIT 1010
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket