throbber
,,
`
`"
`
`l~!
`
`Tht NEW ENGLAND JOURN1\L oJME.DlC!NE
`
`o_R_1c_11_N_._A_L_f_\_R_T_r_c_L_E_·
`
`~!I
`
`Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter
`or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement
`Susheel I( Koda!i. M.D., Mathew R. Williams, M.D., Craig R. Smith, M.D.,
`Lars G. Svensson, M.D .. Ph.D.,John G. Webb, M.D., Raj R. Makkar, M.D.,
`Gregory P. Fontana, M.D. Todd M. Dewey, M.D., Vinod H. Thourani, M.D.,
`Augusto D. Pichard, M.D., Michael Fischbein, M.D., Ph.D., Wilson Y Szeto, M.D.,
`Scott Lirn, M.D .. Kevin L. Greason, M.D., Paul S. Teirstein, M.D.,
`S. Chris Malaisrie, M.D., Pamela S. Douglas, M.D., Rebecca T. Hahn. M.D.,
`Brian Whisenant, M.D., Alan Zajarias, M.D., Duolao Wang, Ph.D.,
`JodiJ. Akin, M.S., William N. Anderson, Ph.D., and Martin B. Leon, M.D..
`for the PARTNER Trial Investigators'''
`
`1 J
`
`~
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`\ ~
`
`EXH\B\T J{ (l
`J/0-1~-/7 <fu~ I
`
`From Columbia University Medical Cen(cid:173)
`ter and New York Presbyterian Hospital
`(S.K.K., M.R.W., C.R.S., R.T.H., M.B.L.)
`and Lenox Hill Hospital (G.P.F.) - both
`in New York; Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
`Cleveland (L.G.S.); University of British
`Columbia and St. Paul's Hospital, Vancou(cid:173)
`ver, Canada U.G.W.); Cedars-Sinai Medi(cid:173)
`cal Center, Los Angeles (R.R.M.); Medi(cid:173)
`cal City Dallas, Dallas (T.M.D.); Emory
`University School of Medicine, Atlanta
`(V.H.T.); Washington Hospital Center,
`Washington, DC (A.D.P.); Stanford Uni(cid:173)
`versity Medical School, Palo Alto (M.F.),
`Scripps Clinic, La Jolla (P.S.T.), and Ed(cid:173)
`wards Lifesciences, Irvine U,J.A., W.N.A.)
`- all in California; Hospital of the Uni(cid:173)
`versity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
`(W.Y.S.); University of Virginia, Charlottes(cid:173)
`ville (S.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
`(K.L.G.); Northwestern University, Chi(cid:173)
`cago (S.C.M.); Duke University Medical
`Center, Durham, NC (P.S.D.); lntermoun(cid:173)
`tain Medical Center, Salt Lake City (B.W.);
`Washington University Medical School
`and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis
`(A.Z.); and London School of Hygiene
`and Tropical Medicine, London (D.W.).
`Address reprint requests to Dr. Kodali at
`Columbia University Medical Center/
`New York Presbyterian Hospital, 161 Fort
`Washington Ave., 6th Fl., New York, NY
`10032, or at sk2427@columbia.edu.
`
`*The investigators, institutions, and re-
`search organizations participating in the
`Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves
`(PARTNER) trial are listed in the Supple(cid:173)
`mentary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.
`
`This article (10.1056/NEJMoal200384) was
`published on March 26, 2012, at NEJM.org.
`
`N EnglJ Med 2012;366:1686-95.
`Copyright © 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`llACKGl?OUND
`The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial showed that among
`high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, the 1-year survival rates are similar with trans(cid:173)
`catheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical replacement. However, longer(cid:173)
`term follow-up is necessary to determine whether TAVR has prolonged benefits.
`
`METHODS
`At 25 centers, we randomly assigned 699 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis
`to undergo either surgical aortic-valve replacement or TAVR. All patients were fol(cid:173)
`lowed for at least 2 years, with assessment of clinical outcomes and echocardiographic
`evaluation.
`
`RESULTS
`The rates of death from any cause were similar in the TAVR and surgery groups
`(hazard ratio with TAVR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.15; P=0.41) and
`at 2 years (Kaplan-Meier analysis) were 33.9% in the TAVR group and 35.0% in the
`surgery group (P=0.78). The frequency of all strokes during follow-up did not differ
`significantly between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.23;
`P=0.52). At 30 days, strokes were more frequent with TAVR than with surgical re(cid:173)
`placement (4.6% vs. 2.4%, P=0.12); subsequently, there were 8 additional strokes in
`the TAVR group and 12 in the surgery group. Improvement in valve areas was similar
`with TAVR and surgical replacement and was maintained for 2 years. Paravalvular
`regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR (P<0.001), and even mild paravalvular
`regurgitation was associated with increased late mortality (P<0.001).
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`A 2-year follow-up of patients in the PARTNER trial supports TAVR as an alternative
`to surgery in high-risk patients. The two treatments were similar with respect to
`mortality, reduction in symptoms, and improved valve hemodynamics, but paraval(cid:173)
`vular regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR and was associated with in(cid:173)
`creased late mortality. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences, Clinica!Trials.gov number,
`NCT00530894.)
`
`1686
`
`N ENGLJ MEO 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC on August 24, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v.
`Boston Scientific Scimed
`IPR2017-00060
`US Pat. 8,992,608
`Exhibit 2097
`
`

`

`,,
`
`"
`
`l~!
`
`Tht NEW ENGLAND JOURN1\L oJME.DlC!NE
`
`o_R_1c_11_N_._A_L_f_\_R_T_r_c_L_E_·
`
`~!I
`
`Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter
`or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement
`Susheel I( Koda!i. M.D., Mathew R. Williams, M.D., Craig R. Smith, M.D.,
`Lars G. Svensson, M.D .. Ph.D.,John G. Webb, M.D., Raj R. Makkar, M.D.,
`Gregory P. Fontana, M.D. Todd M. Dewey, M.D., Vinod H. Thourani, M.D.,
`Augusto D. Pichard, M.D., Michael Fischbein, M.D., Ph.D., Wilson Y Szeto, M.D.,
`Scott Lirn, M.D .. Kevin L. Greason, M.D., Paul S. Teirstein, M.D.,
`S. Chris Malaisrie, M.D., Pamela S. Douglas, M.D., Rebecca T. Hahn. M.D.,
`Brian Whisenant, M.D., Alan Zajarias, M.D., Duolao Wang, Ph.D.,
`JodiJ. Akin, M.S., William N. Anderson, Ph.D., and Martin B. Leon, M.D..
`for the PARTNER Trial Investigators'''
`
`1 J
`
`~
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`\ ~
`
`EXH\B\T J{ (l
`J/0-1~-/7 <fu~ I
`
`From Columbia University Medical Cen(cid:173)
`ter and New York Presbyterian Hospital
`(S.K.K., M.R.W., C.R.S., R.T.H., M.B.L.)
`and Lenox Hill Hospital (G.P.F.) - both
`in New York; Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
`Cleveland (L.G.S.); University of British
`Columbia and St. Paul's Hospital, Vancou(cid:173)
`ver, Canada U.G.W.); Cedars-Sinai Medi(cid:173)
`cal Center, Los Angeles (R.R.M.); Medi(cid:173)
`cal City Dallas, Dallas (T.M.D.); Emory
`University School of Medicine, Atlanta
`(V.H.T.); Washington Hospital Center,
`Washington, DC (A.D.P.); Stanford Uni(cid:173)
`versity Medical School, Palo Alto (M.F.),
`Scripps Clinic, La Jolla (P.S.T.), and Ed(cid:173)
`wards Lifesciences, Irvine U,J.A., W.N.A.)
`- all in California; Hospital of the Uni(cid:173)
`versity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
`(W.Y.S.); University of Virginia, Charlottes(cid:173)
`ville (S.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
`(K.L.G.); Northwestern University, Chi(cid:173)
`cago (S.C.M.); Duke University Medical
`Center, Durham, NC (P.S.D.); lntermoun(cid:173)
`tain Medical Center, Salt Lake City (B.W.);
`Washington University Medical School
`and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis
`(A.Z.); and London School of Hygiene
`and Tropical Medicine, London (D.W.).
`Address reprint requests to Dr. Kodali at
`Columbia University Medical Center/
`New York Presbyterian Hospital, 161 Fort
`Washington Ave., 6th Fl., New York, NY
`10032, or at sk2427@columbia.edu.
`
`*The investigators, institutions, and re-
`search organizations participating in the
`Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves
`(PARTNER) trial are listed in the Supple(cid:173)
`mentary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.
`
`This article (10.1056/NEJMoal200384) was
`published on March 26, 2012, at NEJM.org.
`
`N EnglJ Med 2012;366:1686-95.
`Copyright © 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society.
`
`llACKGl?OUND
`The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial showed that among
`high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, the 1-year survival rates are similar with trans(cid:173)
`catheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical replacement. However, longer(cid:173)
`term follow-up is necessary to determine whether TAVR has prolonged benefits.
`
`METHODS
`At 25 centers, we randomly assigned 699 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis
`to undergo either surgical aortic-valve replacement or TAVR. All patients were fol(cid:173)
`lowed for at least 2 years, with assessment of clinical outcomes and echocardiographic
`evaluation.
`
`RESULTS
`The rates of death from any cause were similar in the TAVR and surgery groups
`(hazard ratio with TAVR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.15; P=0.41) and
`at 2 years (Kaplan-Meier analysis) were 33.9% in the TAVR group and 35.0% in the
`surgery group (P=0.78). The frequency of all strokes during follow-up did not differ
`significantly between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.23;
`P=0.52). At 30 days, strokes were more frequent with TAVR than with surgical re(cid:173)
`placement (4.6% vs. 2.4%, P=0.12); subsequently, there were 8 additional strokes in
`the TAVR group and 12 in the surgery group. Improvement in valve areas was similar
`with TAVR and surgical replacement and was maintained for 2 years. Paravalvular
`regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR (P<0.001), and even mild paravalvular
`regurgitation was associated with increased late mortality (P<0.001).
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`A 2-year follow-up of patients in the PARTNER trial supports TAVR as an alternative
`to surgery in high-risk patients. The two treatments were similar with respect to
`mortality, reduction in symptoms, and improved valve hemodynamics, but paraval(cid:173)
`vular regurgitation was more frequent after TAVR and was associated with in(cid:173)
`creased late mortality. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences, Clinica!Trials.gov number,
`NCT00530894.)
`
`1686
`
`N ENGLJ MEO 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC on August 24, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`TRANSCATHETER VS. SURGICAL AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT
`
`'t
`
`.. ;i ~- \ high mortality after the appearance of car-
`
`ORTIC STENOSIS IS ASSOCIATED WITH
`
`diac symptoms.1 Nevertheless, many pa(cid:173)
`tients do not undergo surgical aortic-valve replace(cid:173)
`ment owing to real or perceived increased risks
`associated with surgery. 2-5 Trans catheter aortic(cid:173)
`valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an al(cid:173)
`ternative therapy in high-risk patients with aortic
`stenosis. 6-10 Observational registries from vari(cid:173)
`ous countries have reported I-monrh and I-year
`outcomes after TAVR,11-14 but there are limited
`long-term follow-up data.15
`The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves
`(PARTNER) trial was a randomized trial compar(cid:173)
`ing TAVR with standard-of-care therapies in high(cid:173)
`risk patients with aortic stenosis. One-year mor(cid:173)
`tality outcomes from PARTNER showed that TAVR
`was superior to standard therapy in patients who
`could not undergo surgery16 and was noninferior
`to surgical replacement in high-risk patients who
`could undergo surgery.17 However, longer-term
`data are required to assess valve durability and
`to monitor late clinical complications, before
`TAVR is used more widely in clinical practice.
`This report describes the 2-year (and longer) clini(cid:173)
`cal outcomes and echocardiographic findings after
`TAVR or surgical aortic-valve replacement in the
`high-risk patients in the PARTNER trial who could
`undergo surgery.
`
`formed through a small intercostal incision over
`the left ventricular apex with the use of a dedicat(cid:173)
`ed delivery catheter and the same SAPIEN valve.
`Heparin was administered during the proce(cid:173)
`dure, and dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and
`clopidogrel) was recommended for 6 months af..
`terward. The outpatient regimen was frequently
`modified by the treating physicians because of
`increased bleeding risks.
`
`STUDY DESIGN AND OVERSIGHT
`The study design and data-management practices
`have been described previously.16•17 A total of 699
`patients from 25 sites were randomly assigned to
`TAVR or surgical replacement. Patients assigned
`to TAVR were treated by either the transfemoral or
`transapical approach on the basis of whether pe(cid:173)
`ripheral arteries could accommodate the large
`sheaths required (22 French for the 23-mm valve
`and 24 French for the 26-mm valve). Patients who
`were randomly assigned to surgical replacement
`were stratified according to whether a transferno(cid:173)
`ral or transapical approach would have been used.
`The study was designed and monitored by the
`sponsor, Edwards Lifescierices, and the executive
`committee, which included four interventional
`cardiologists and four cardiac surgeons. The spon(cid:173)
`sor funded the study and participated in the se(cid:173)
`lection and management of the sites, the collec(cid:173)
`tion of the data, and data monitoring. The first
`author and members of the executive committee
`had unrestricted access to the data after the data(cid:173)
`base had been locked and prepared all drafts of
`the manuscript; they attest to the completeness
`and accuracy of the reported data and to the ad(cid:173)
`herence of the study to the protocol (available with
`the full text of this article at NEJM.org). The trial
`was approved by the institutional review board
`at each site. Written informed consent was ob(cid:173)
`tained from all patients.
`
`STUDY END POINTS
`The prespecified primary end point of the PART(cid:173)
`NER trial was all-cause mortality at 1 year for the
`pooled cohort. Prespecified secondary end points
`included cardiovascular mortality, stroke, repeat
`hospitalization, acute kidney injury, vascular com(cid:173)
`plications, bleeding events, and New York Heart
`Association (NYHA) functional class. All patients
`were followed for at least 2 years and had annual
`clinical visits and echocardiographic evaluations.
`Crossovers between the two treatment groups were
`not permitted. A clinical-events committee was
`
`METHODS
`
`PATIENTS
`Patient selection for this cohort of the PARTNER
`trial has been described previously." Inclusion cri(cid:173)
`teria were severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (an
`aortic-valve area 5.0.8 cm2 plus a peak velocity L4 m
`per second or a mean valve gradient L40 mm Hg)
`and high-risk status for surgical aortic-valve re(cid:173)
`placement, as determined by experienced surgeons.
`Patients were considered to be at high surgical
`risk if they had coexisting conditions that were
`associated with a risk of death of at least 15% by
`30 days after the operation.
`
`STUDY DEVICE AND PROCEDURE
`The SAPIEN heart-valve system (Edwards Life(cid:173)
`sciences) and the TAVR procedure have been de(cid:173)
`scribed previously.16•17 Most procedures were per(cid:173)
`formed in a hybrid operating room with a fixed
`fluoroscopic imaging system, while the patient was
`under general anesthesia, and with transesopha(cid:173)
`geal echocardiography. Transapical TAVR was per-
`
`N ENGLJ MED 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`1687
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARJAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC on August 24, 20 I 7. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`.,
`
`The NEW ENGL1\ND JOURNAi.. oJMED!ClNE
`
`tory of coronary artery disease, 43.0% had a his(cid:173)
`tory of coronary-artery bypass surgery, 42.4% had
`peripheral vascular disease, 43.3% had pulmo(cid:173)
`nary disease, and 41.3% had diabetes), The TAVR
`and surgery groups were generally well matched
`with regard to baseline characteristics (Table 1
`in the Supplementary Appendix), except for a
`slightly higher incidence of renal dysfunction in
`the TAVR group (creatinine level >2 mg per deci(cid:173)
`liter [177 µ,mo! per liter): 10.8%, as compared
`with 6.4% in the surgery group; P=0.04). The
`mean Society ofThoracic Surgeons predicted risk
`of death at 30 days was 11.8±3.4%.
`Of the 699 study patients, 42 did not receive
`the assigned therapy: 4 in the TAVR group and 38
`in the surgery group.17 The main reasons for non(cid:173)
`treatment were withdrawal from the study and
`the patient's decision not to undergo surgery (28
`patients).
`
`responsible for adjudicating all end points. Defi(cid:173)
`nitions of the end points are identical to those in
`the original trial and have been reported else(cid:173)
`where.16,17
`
`STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
`For data analyses, the intention-to-treat analysis
`started at the time of randomization, and the as(cid:173)
`treated analysis started at the time of induction
`of anesthesia in the procedure room. All clinical
`outcomes were primarily analyzed with the use
`of an intention-to-treat analysis, but the results
`of as-treated analyses are also presented for com(cid:173)
`parison. All echocardiographic analyses were per(cid:173)
`formed with the use of the as-treated data. Cat(cid:173)
`egorical variables were compared with the use of
`Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables, presented
`as means ±SD, were compared with the use of
`Student's t-test. Survival curves for time-to-event
`variables were constructed with the use of Kap(cid:173)
`lan-Meier estimates based on all available data
`and were compared with the use of the log-rank
`test. To study the effect of risk factors on mortal(cid:173)
`ity, Cox proportional-hazards regression was per(cid:173)
`formed. For the multivariable analyses, multiple
`imputations were used to accommodate missing
`baseline variables. The multivariable models in(cid:173)
`cluded covariates with a P value ofless than 0.20
`in univariate analyses. An additional time-depen(cid:173)
`dent covariate analysis was performed to test the
`association of complications during TAVR or sur(cid:173)
`gical replacement with subsequent mortality. All
`statistical analyses were performed with the use
`of SAS software, version 9.2.
`
`MORTALITY AND STROKE
`Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year have been de(cid:173)
`scribed previously.17 For the duration of the trial,
`there were no significant differences in survival
`between the TAVR and surgery groups in either
`the intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio with
`TAVR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to
`1.15; P=0.41) or the as-treated analysis (hazard
`ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.25; P=0.85) (Fig. 1).
`Between 1 and 2 years, there were 32 additional
`deaths in the TAVR group and 25 in the surgery
`group. At 2 years, there were no significant dif..
`ferences in mortality from any cause between the
`TAVR group (33.9%; 95% CI, 28.9 to 39.0) and
`the surgery group (35.0%; 95% CI, 29.8 to 40.2;
`P=0.78) (Table 1). Cardiovascular mortality at
`2 years was also similar in the TAVR and surgery
`groups (21.4% [95% CI, 16.8 to 26.0J and 20.5%
`[95% CI, 15.8 to 25.3), respectively; P=0.80). Sim(cid:173)
`ilarly, in the as-treated analysis, the TAVRand sur(cid:173)
`gery groups did not differ significantly with re(cid:173)
`spect to all-cause mortality (33.9% and 32.7%,
`respectively; P=0.75) or cardiovascular mortality
`(20.8% and 18.5%, respectively; P=0.50) (Table 2
`in the Supplementary Appendix).
`Between 1 and 2 years, eight strokes occurred
`(four in the TAVR group and four in the surgery
`group) and three transient ischemic attacks (two
`in the TAVR group and one in the surgery group).
`The frequency of all neurologic events (strokes and
`transient ischemic attacks) at 2 years was higher
`with TAVR than with surgical replacement (11.2%
`
`RJ;:SULTS
`
`PATIENTS
`In the randomized TAVR group, 244 patients had
`acceptable vascular access and were treated by
`means of the transfemoral approach, and the re(cid:173)
`maining 104 patients were treated by means of
`the transapical approach. Surgical replacement
`was performed in 351 patients. Figure 1 in the
`Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org,
`shows the study-group assignments and follow(cid:173)
`up. All patients were followed for at least 2 years
`(median, 727 days; maximum, 1490 days). The
`overall study population was elderly (mean age,
`84.1±6.6 years), had severe cardiac symptoms
`(94.1% had NYHA class III or IV status), and had
`frequent coexisting conditions (75.5% had a his-
`
`1688
`
`N ENGL) MED 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC on August 24, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`TRANSCATHETER VS. SURGICAL AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT
`
`A Death from Any Cause, Intention-to-Treat Population
`60 Hazard ratio, 0.90 (95% Cl, 0.71-1.15)
`[ 50
`P=0.41
`..
`QI
`"'
`::,
`40
`u
`>,
`,:
`<
`E
`~
`0
`,£
`"'
`QI
`C
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`B Death from Any Cause, As-Treated Population
`60 Hazard ratio, 0.98 (95% Cl, 0.76-1.25)
`l 50 P-0.85
`QI
`"'
`::,
`"'
`u
`>,
`,:
`<
`E
`~
`0
`...
`..c
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`QI
`C
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18
`Month
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18
`Month
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`No. at Risk
`TAVR
`Surgery·
`
`348
`351
`
`298
`252
`
`260
`236
`
`234
`217
`
`172
`165
`
`70
`65
`
`31
`32
`
`No. at Risk
`TAVR
`Surgery
`
`344
`313
`
`291
`243
`
`259
`229
`
`232
`211
`
`155
`143
`
`70
`63
`
`29
`28
`
`C Stroke, Intention-to-Treat Population
`60
`
`D Death from Any Cause or Stroke, Intention-to-Treat Population
`60
`
`50
`
`Hazard ratio, 1.22 (95% Cl, 0.67-2.23)
`P=0.52
`
`i 40
`..
`-
`
`.&
`a::
`,:
`QI
`>
`w
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`r::==
`0
`0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`24
`
`18
`Month
`
`Hazard ratio, 0.93 (95% Cl, 0.73-1.18)
`P~0.55
`
`50
`
`i 40
`-
`.&
`"'
`a::
`,:
`QI
`>
`w
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`6
`
`12
`
`18
`Month
`
`24
`
`30
`
`36
`
`Surgery
`
`I
`
`30
`
`TAVR
`36
`
`No. at Risk
`TAVR
`Surgery
`
`348
`351
`
`287
`246
`
`249
`230
`
`224
`211
`
`162
`160
`
`65
`62
`
`28
`31
`
`No. at Risk
`TAVR
`Surgery
`
`348
`351
`
`291
`247
`
`254
`232
`
`230
`213
`
`168
`162
`
`68
`63
`
`29
`31
`
`Figure l. Time-to-Event Curves for the Primary and Other Selected End Points.
`Events were calculated with the use of Kaplan-Meier methods and compared with the use of a log-rank test. TAVR denotes transcatheter
`aortic-valve replacement.
`
`vs. 6.5%, P=0.05). However, there was no signifi(cid:173)
`cant difference in the number of overall strokes
`between the TAVR and surgery groups (hazard
`ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.23; P=0.52) (Fig. 1).
`After the early increased hazard of stroke in the
`first 30 days associated with TAVR (4.6% with
`TAVR vs. 2.4% with surgical replacement, P=0.12),
`there were 8 additional strokes in the TAVR group
`and 12 in the surgery group, such that the total
`number of strokes over the follow-up period (36
`months) was 24 in the TAVR group and 20 in the
`surgery group. The composite of the rate of death
`from any cause or stroke did not differ signifi(cid:173)
`cantly between the two treatment groups (hazard
`ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.18; P=0.55) (Fig. 1);
`at 2 years, the rate was 37.1% in the TAVR group
`and 36.4% in the surgery group (P=0.85).
`
`OTHER CLINICAL OUTCOMES
`Other clinical events are summarized in Table 1.
`Major vascular complications and major bleeding
`events were frequent procedure-related complica(cid:173)
`tions in the TAVR and surgery groups, respec(cid:173)
`tively, but after 1 year, these events were uncom(cid:173)
`mon and did not differ significantly between the
`groups. No patients were treated with balloon aor(cid:173)
`tic valvuloplasty or repeat TAVR between 1 and
`2 years. Endocarditis was rare. and occurred at a
`similar rate in the two groups (1.5% in the TAVR
`group and 1.0% in the surgery group, P=0.61).
`No patients in either group had structural valve
`deterioration requiring surgical replacement dur(cid:173)
`ing follow-up.
`At 2 years, there was no significant difference
`in the rate of repeat hospitalization between the
`
`N ENGLJ MEO 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`1689
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC on August 24, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved,
`
`

`

`J'
`
`The N E IV ENG L ,\ N D / 0 U R NA L oJ M ED IC l N E
`
`Table 1. Clinical Outcomes at 1 Year and 2 Years with TAVR or Surgery (Intention-to-Treat Population).*
`
`Outcome
`
`1 Year
`
`2 Years
`
`Death
`From any cause
`From cardiovascular causes
`Repeat hospitalization+
`Death from any cause or repeat
`hospitalization:j:
`Stroke or TIA§
`All
`Stroke
`TIA
`Death from any cause or stroke
`Myocardial infarction
`Major vascular complication,
`Major bleeding]
`Endocarditis
`Renal failure**
`New pacemaker
`SVD requiring surgical replacement
`
`Surgery
`(N=351)
`
`TAVR
`(N-348)
`
`P Value ]
`
`Surgery
`(N-351)
`
`TAVR
`(N =348)
`
`P Value+
`
`no. of patients (%)
`
`no. of patients (%)
`
`89 (26.8)
`40 (13.0)
`51 (17.7)
`125 (37.7)
`
`84 (24.3)
`47 (14.3)
`59 (18.6)
`121 (34.9)
`
`0.45
`0.63
`0.78
`0.45
`
`114 (35.0)
`59 (20.5)
`60 (21.7)
`152 (46.5)
`
`116 (33.9)
`67 (21.4)
`74 (24.7)
`159 (46.6)
`
`0.78
`0.80
`0.41
`0.99
`
`13 (4.3)
`10 (3.2)
`4 (1.5)
`95 (28.6)
`2 (0.6)
`13 (3.8)
`88 (26.7)
`3 (1.0)
`20 (6.5)
`16 (5.0)
`0
`
`28 (8.7)
`20 (6.0)
`8 (2.6)
`95 (27.4)
`0
`39 (11.3)
`52 (15. 7)
`2 (0.6)
`18 (5.4)
`21 (6.4)
`0
`
`0.03
`0.08
`0.32
`0.74
`0.16
`<0.001
`<0.001
`0.63
`0.57
`0.44
`
`18 (6.5)
`14 (4.9)
`5 (2.0)
`119 (36.4)
`4 (1.5)
`13 (3.8)
`95 (29.5)
`3 (1.0)
`21 (6.9)
`19 (6.4)
`0
`
`34 (11.2)
`24 (7.7)
`10 (3.6)
`127 (37.1)
`0
`40 (11.6)
`60 (19.0)
`4 (1.5)
`20 (6.2)
`23 (7.2)
`0
`
`0.05
`0.17
`0.26
`0.85
`0.05
`<0.001
`0.002
`0.61
`0.75
`0.69
`
`* All percentages are Kaplan-Meier estimates at the specific time point and thus do not equal the number of patients
`divided by the total number in the study group. SVD denotes structural valve deterioration, TAVR transcatheter aortic(cid:173)
`valve replacement, and TIA transient ischemic attack.
`t P values are for between-group comparisons of the frequency of the event at each time point.
`:j: Repeat hospitalizations were included in the analysis if they were for symptoms of heart failure, angina, or syncope
`due to aortic-valve disease that required aortic-valve intervention or intensified medical management.
`§ Stroke was defined as a neurologic deficit lasting more than 24 hours or lasting less than 24 hours with a brain-imag(cid:173)
`ing study showing infarction.
`"i Major vascular complications were defined as thoracic aortic dissection; access-site or access-related vascular injury
`leading to death, the need for substantial blood transfusion (>3 units), or percutaneous or surgical intervention; and
`distal embolization (noncerebral) from a vascular source requiring surgery or amputation or resulting in irreversible
`end-organ damage.
`Major bleeding was defined as any episode of major internal or external bleeding that caused death, hospitalization,
`or permanent injury or that necessitated the transfusion of at least 3 units of packed red cells or a pericardiocentesis
`procedure.
`** Renal failure was defined as any condition requiring the initiation of any dialysis.
`
`TAVR and surgery groups (24.7% and 21.7%, re(cid:173)
`spectively; P=0.41). Among survivors at 2 years,
`the mean NYHA class was similar in the TAVR
`and surgery groups (1.72 and 1.70, P=0.87), and
`the majority of patients in both groups had NYHA
`class I or II status (83.9% in the TAVR group and
`85.2% in the surgery group). Clinical outcomes in
`the subgroups of patients in whom a transferno(cid:173)
`ral or transapical approach was used are shown
`in Tables 3 through 6 in the Supplementary Ap(cid:173)
`pendix.
`
`PREDICTORS OF MORTALITY
`Predictors of mortality for the overall trial cohort
`as well as for each of the randomized groups are
`presented in Table 2. Treatment assignment was
`not a significant predictor of the risk of death.
`The time-dependent effect of treatment com(cid:173)
`plications on subsequent mortality was also eval(cid:173)
`uated. Strokes greatly increased the hazard of
`death in both groups (TAVR: hazard ratio, 2.47;
`95% CI, 1.42 to 4.30; P<0.001; surgery: hazard
`ratio, 5.20; 95% CI, 3.07 to 8.80; P<0.001). Major
`
`1690
`
`N ENGLJ MED 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARIAD Pl IARMACEUT!CALS INC on August 24, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`TRANSCATHETER VS. SURGICAL AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT
`
`Table 2. Multivariable Predictors of Mortality.*
`
`Hazard Ratio
`(95% Cl)
`
`0.89 (0.70-1.13)
`0.96 (0.94-0.98)
`2.24 (1.30-4.00)
`0.89 (0.81-0.98)
`1.04 (1.01-1.08)
`1.36 (1.02-1.82)
`
`0.93 (0.90-0.97)
`0.82 (0.72-0.94)
`1.06 (1.00-1.13)
`1.85 (1.01-3.39)
`
`P Value
`
`0.34
`<0.001
`0.006
`0.02
`0.02
`0.04
`
`<0.001
`0.003
`0.04
`0.05
`
`Variable
`Overall.
`TAVR group
`Body-mass indext
`Liver disease:j:
`Mean gradient per increase oflO mm Hg
`STS risk score§
`Moderate or severe mitral regurgitation at baseline
`TAVR
`Body-mass index+
`Mean gradient per increase oflO mm Hg
`Creatinine level at baseline,
`Prior vascular surgery or stent
`Surgery
`CABG
`STS risk score§
`Liver disease:):
`Moderate or severe mitral regurgitation at baseline
`
`0.002
`0.004
`0.02
`0.006
`* Unless otherwise indicated, the hazard ratio reflects the presence or absence of the variable. CABG denotes coronary(cid:173)
`artery bypass grafting.
`t For body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters), the hazard ratio reflects
`an increase of 1.
`:): Liver disease indicates a history of any liver condition.
`§ The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score predicts the 30-day risk of death (on a scale of0% to 100%, with
`higher scores indicating higher predicted risk). The hazard ratio reflects an increase of 1%.
`, For creatinine level at baseline, the hazard ratio reflects an increase of 1 mg per deciliter.
`
`0.57 (0.40-0.82)
`1.07 (1.02-1.12)
`2.59 (1.16-5.43)
`1. 77 (1.17-2.68)
`
`bleeding also increased the hazard of death in
`both groups (TAVR: hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% CI,
`1.41 to 3.17; P<0.001; surgery: hazard ratio, 2.94;
`95% CI, 2.08 to 4.15; P<0.001). Major vascular
`complications affected survival only in the TAVR
`group (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.73;
`P=0.02).
`
`ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS
`The early hemodynamic improvements that were
`seen with both surgical replacement and TAVR
`were maintained at 2 years, with no significant
`changes in valve areas or mean gradients (Fig. 2).
`Moderate or severe paravalvular aortic regurgita(cid:173)
`tion was more common after TAVR than after
`surgical replacement at both 1 and 2 years (7.0%
`vs. 1.9% at 1 year, and 6.9% vs. 0.9% at 2 years;
`P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among the 143
`patients who underwent echocardiographic eval-
`
`uation 2 years after TAVR, paravalvular aortic re(cid:173)
`gurgitation remained unchanged in 46.2% of pa(cid:173)
`tients, was improved in 31.5%, and was worse in
`22.4% (Table 7 in the Supplementary Appendix).
`The presence of paravalvular or total aortic re(cid:173)
`gurgitation (mild, moderate, or severe vs. none or
`trace) after TAVR was associated with increased
`late mortality (hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.43 to
`3.10; P<0.001) (Fig. 3). The effect of aortic regur(cid:173)
`gitation on mortality was proportional to the se(cid:173)
`verity of the regurgitation (Fig. 3), but even mild
`aortic regurgitation was associated with an in(cid:173)
`creased rate of late deaths.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The salient findings from this 2-year analysis of
`the randomized PARTNER trial are as follows:
`mortality after TAVR remained similar to that
`
`N ENGLJ MEO 366;18 NEJM.ORG MAY 3, 2012
`
`1691
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`Downloaded from nejm.org at ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC on August 24, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright© 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`

`

`The NEW ENGL,\ND JOl.lRNi\l.. oJ;\IED!CINE
`
`..
`
`A
`
`8
`
`2.5
`
`2.0
`
`LS
`
`LO
`
`0.5
`
`o.o
`
`No. at Risk
`Surgery
`TAVR
`
`..
`J:
`- C:
`E
`_g_
`.,
`'o
`I! o
`.. .,
`
`C:
`
`:i
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`a
`
`--- TAVR
`
`·• '- Surgery
`
`P-0.54
`
`r
`, -- -~--l_j
`1
`;/ :~~-001
`
`P=0.002
`
`P=0.003
`
`P-~.16
`
`T
`l
`P-0.32
`
`·-··- ·--. ··-·· ··-··. ·-·-·-·-·---· -·--···--··-1
`P=0.53
`
`Baseline
`
`30 Day
`
`6 Mo
`
`l Yr
`
`2 Yr
`
`224
`290
`110
`151
`163
`301
`269
`139
`210
`223
`---------·-·--·-------------
`
`r
`
`r----· .. -----
`P-0.01
`
`P=0.22
`
`i
`
`L
`30 Day
`
`Baseline
`
`P=0.08
`
`P=0.005
`
`P=0.16
`
`6 Mo
`
`l Yr
`
`2 Yr
`
`niques, and device technologies.12,14,16-18 How(c

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket