throbber
Cardiovascular Radiology
`
`David D. Lawrence, ]r., MD 0 Chusilp Charnsangavej, MD
`- Kenneth C. Wright, PhD 0 Cesar Gianturco, MD - Sidney Wallace, MD
`
`
`
`Percutaneous Endovascular Graft:
`
`Experimental Evaluation‘
`
`An arterial endovascular graft was
`constructed by wrapping a Dacron
`cylinder around the Gianturco ex-
`pandable metallic stent. The device
`was passed through an 11-F Teflon
`catheter into the normal abdominal
`or thoracic aortas of nine dogs. At
`follow-up of 7-35 weeks, all but one
`graft remained patent. At necropsy,
`the grafts were almost completely
`covered by neo-intimal prolifera-
`tion. Similar proliferation was ob-
`served between the graft and the
`wall of the vessel.
`
`lndex tenns: Aorta, grafts and prostheses, 56.45
`- Arteries, grafts and prostheses, 94.456
`
`Radiology 1987; 163:357-360
`
`' From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging,
`Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Universi-
`ty of Texas System Cancer Center. M.D. Ander-
`son Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston.
`From the 1986 RSNA annual meeting. Received
`November 10. 1986: accepted January 3, 1987.
`This work was supported in part by the I. S.
`Dunn Research Foundation and the George A.
`Cook Memorial Fund. Address reprint re-
`quests to D.D.L., Department of Radiology,
`University of Texas Medical School at Houston.
`6341 Fannin, Suite 2130 MSMB, Houston, TX
`77030.
`° RSNA, 1987
`
`THE Gianturco expandable metallic
`stent has been placed successful-
`ly within the venous system and tra-
`cheobronchial tree in humans, indic-
`ative of its utility in expanding
`narrowed lumens (1, 2). Endovascu-
`lar stents have also been placed in
`the arteries of animals, with eventual
`incorporation of the stents into the
`vessel walls (3, 4).
`Another use of the Gianturco stent
`is as a vehicle for the intravascular
`placement of other materials. We de-
`veloped such a modification to allow
`intravascular placement of a Dacron
`graft, using multiple Gianturco stents
`as a superstructure by which to an-
`chor and support the graft. Such a
`device may find use in the treatment
`of aneurysms, as it allows creation of
`a new lumen within the aneurysm
`while sealing off the aneurysm out-
`side of the device in a manner similar
`to a surgically placed graft. To evalu-
`ate the feasibility of the placement
`and short-term patency of this de-
`vice. we studied it in the normal aor-
`tas of nine dogs.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Stent Construction
`
`The endovascular graft consisted of
`multiple stents in tandem connected to
`each other by metallic struts. The first
`stent was designated the lead stent; the
`last, as the trail stent (Fig. la). The Dacron
`tubing was wrapped around the outside
`of the middle group of stents, internaliz-
`ing them within the Dacron graft. The
`lead and trail stcnts acted as anchors for
`the graft, while the internal stents served
`to open the Dacron tubing when the de-
`vice was released from the catheter (Fig.
`1c).
`The lead and trail stents were con-
`structed, as previously described (3), of
`stainless steel wire with a diameter of
`0.016 inch. Each stent had six bends and
`no side barbs. The stents were approxi-
`mately 2.5 cm long, with a diameter of ap-
`proximately 2.5 cm when fully expanded.
`The internal stents were similarly con-
`
`structed, but wire of thinner gauge was
`used.
`The graft tubes were made from thin,
`woven Dacron sheets. The graft was ap-
`proximately 1.0 cm in diameter and usu-
`ally 5.0 cm in length (range. 2.5-9.5 cm
`long). The ends of the graft were attached
`to the limbs of the lead and trail stents
`with 6-0 suture material. Once construct-
`ed, the devices were loaded into 12-F Tef-
`lon cartridges and gas sterilized with eth-
`ylene oxide.
`
`Graft Placement and Follow-up
`Study
`After intravenous induction of sodium
`pentobarbital into the dogs for general
`anesthesia and after systemic hepariniza-
`tion, an 11-F stent introduction assembly
`(Cook, Bloomington, lnd.) was intro-
`duced into the normal abdominal aortas
`of six dogs and the normal thoracic aortas
`of three dogs by a femoral arteriotomy
`procedure. Aortography was performed
`to document the size of the vessel. The
`grafts were then introduced through the
`cartridge and released under fluoroscopic
`guidance with the technique previously
`described for placement of a Gianturco
`stent (3). A second arteriogram was then
`obtained to enable evaluation of the im-
`mediate postplacement results. The ani-
`mals were not given anticoagulants rou-
`tinely following graft placement except
`for heparinization during follow-up stud-
`ies.
`
`Aortography was performed 1 week af-
`ter graft placement in the first six dogs
`and prior to death in all dogs. No imme-
`diate or delayed complications related to
`the graft placement were observed clini-
`cally.
`The dogs were killed by exsanguina-
`tion under deep pentobarbital anesthesia
`at 7 weeks (two dogs), 8 weeks (four
`dogs), and at 10, 16, and 35 weeks (one
`dog each) after the procedure. At necrop-
`sy, the section of the aorta containing the
`graft was removed, together with the kid-
`neys, if any portion of the device had
`bridged the renal arteries.
`
`RESULTS
`
`All grafts, with one exception, re-
`mained patent during the periods of
`observation. There was no evidence
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029, p
`
`
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029, p. 1 of 4
`
`

`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029, p. 2 of 4
`
`

`
`.1.
`
`b.
`
`C.
`
`(.1, ti) l(.2dioy,r.'ipl1s from lateral ;ibdomin:xl.1orto;;raint of dog 8 lv\'L‘L‘i4:ii1itt?t' placunicxit of ciidova.sml.:ir graft. Dacmu portion is be-
`Figure 2.
`twt-on two long .'trrn\\‘s.Tl1crv: is mild lumiiml l\M’1‘t')\\’it\g in the region of thegratt as. :1 result of m.-o-intimai }~rolit't-ration. Note occlixaion
`(short .'ll‘l‘i':\\') of nrigiii.» of t..~S lumbar nrzvricss by the g,r.it‘t, with reconstitution by mllnterals. (C) Anterupostcrior nortograni of sanie animal
`~lm\w,~ lL‘J\l 1-lvnl tiridgixig let’: renal arter)-‘ but not occluding,‘ it.
`
`sin was Ul).St‘.I‘VL‘ti in the nc~o-intimzi of
`one gm ft. Tlw degree of organimtion
`did not appear to be t't.‘lOit?L‘l to length
`01’ time that the graft had been in
`place, as tlcrisc organization could be
`SUCH at 7 wocks, and loussc organiza-
`tion was Lltflltttltrilrillttcl at 35 weeks,
`:1 ml tho various tir:grccs could be ob-
`S-t.‘!'\‘£.’(l in lllt.‘ smnc i;mt't. l‘-Iviclencc of
`I't‘\.‘.'lll(illZ£)tl0ll in the neo-intimn was
`})I't.‘.\t.‘I‘tl in $t.‘\'t.‘r£ll spccinwns (Fig. 4).
`Slt‘l1(_3f§l5}1l§‘;l“tli‘lCiitltt‘I10llt;l1 to pro-
`(iucm l1_vp:.~rtrupl\it-ti collnts-r.il.-; dovet-
`.opt.~ti in two tgrgiftzc. Ono stcmisis was
`related to usv of an ovcrsiz.<.'d graft,
`which liL‘i)l‘l)' 0L‘Cltt(iL‘Ll the aorta. The
`other was mused by fziiliirc of the
`czimlsit mid of tho l.);u:r0n to open
`l'ull_\', d.\ it \\'.'lS not tiricig;L*dt\y;ii1 in-
`ternal stcnl. Small, urg;1rii7.eul throm-
`lwlit‘ \’t“;:t*t;tti(>n_s \\’t'rc pros-.'i1t 011
`tins of llw tiv\'iu-5 (at ,7 \~.:'-.-wigs and at
`33 \\’L*t"l\I~':l but \\'t‘l't' not .‘~'t,‘t,'l1 in .'iny of
`thv other y,ml't_-.
`l'l1t.‘ l.).it‘rtm i;r.‘il't that did not re-
`
`\.’,.l..ns.» I-.’:
`
`l\l..n~|....-"2
`
`main patent had been disrupted by
`heat from inadvertent autoclaving
`before insertion. At necropsy. 16
`weeks after placement. the graft was
`found to be laiyered against the anter-
`olntcrat wall of the vessel and, inter-
`estingly, was completely covered
`with nco-intima.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The goal in the cievclopmcnt of the
`I;‘X1\i(J\’£l>‘t.‘Ltli3f graft was to produce: :1
`device that could be placed by it
`trzirisczitlxoter approach to treat an .m—
`eurysm. The device should pass
`through a relatively small catheter
`and expand to fit the lumen of the
`vesaeel. When in place, the device
`should then act in the saiiiuz way as .2
`surgically placed graft, providing‘ a
`new conduit for blood flow and sup-
`porting the \\’t;‘£ll<L'{l\('L"l v;i:;cul.1r wall.
`Our prelimin;i.r_v ¢'.'\'&'tltl.'itit)n of the
`u:icl(wa.<ctilar device in normal aortas
`
`of clogs duiriciiistrates that our design
`was easily placed through an 11-17
`catheter into the vessel. It was shown
`that the grafts occluded the side
`br;mcl'n.-2; tliey tiridgecl as well as pro-
`ctucing, a nco-intima similar to that
`seen in surgically placard gr:\t't.~:; (5-
`11). The vessels bridged by stunt
`wires alone dcnionstratud potency
`without cvicleiice of distal emboii.
`This feature will allow pl:iceinont' of
`the ltratl stem across the renal arter-
`ies, pcrmitting placcn1cr1toftl‘ic Cc-
`phntic portion of the graft just below
`the ltrvul of the rt,-nal ai'tt:r_v. Space
`between the ggraft wall and the native
`intima was t'ill:'.-cl, stxggc-stiiig that the
`anenrysm nmy fill in with .1 t'ibropr0-
`till-rativc tissiic respoiisu. Our future
`0.\PL‘I'llI1(‘l’l ts will ¢;‘\’alLlOiC this.
`l\-lost of the coniplicatiomz (perform
`lion, stciitvsis) that occurred were re-
`latml to technical factors and are pn-
`tontial ly zwoitlutila by cnreftil
`attention to graft plaiccmcnt and to
`
`R 241 inlnuu o ’1§()
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029,&
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029, p. 3 of 4
`
`

`
`tailoring the graft to the diameter of
`the vascular lumen. The presence of
`vegetation on two of the stents is
`bothersome and needs further evalu-
`ation.
`
`While this endovascular graft was
`
`designed primarily for evaluation in
`aneurysms, other potential experi-
`ments include its use as a postangio-
`plasty adjunct and as stents in the ve-
`nous system and other organ
`systems. I
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`(a) Cross specimen of device in abdominal aorta. There is nearly complete cover-
`Figure 3.
`ing of the device by neo-intima. (b) Cross specimen shows lead stent wire bridging left renal
`artery. The vessel remains patent, and there is no neo-intimal covering over the portion of
`the wire bridging the artery. The Dacron graft and its junction with the native vessel (arrow)
`are completelycovered with neo-intima.
`
`Acknowledgments: We thank lrene Szwarc,
`R. T., and Raquel Collins. B.S., for their invalu-
`able technical assistance, and John Kuykendahl
`and Jay Johnson for photography. We are
`grateful to L. Clifton Stephens, D.V.M., i’h.D.,
`for reviewing and photographing the histolog-
`ic specimens and to Katie lsch for secretarial
`help.
`
`References
`1. Charnsangavej C, Carrasco CH, Wallace 5, et
`al. Stenosis of the vena cava: preliminary as-
`sessment of treatment with expandable me-
`tallic stents. Radiology 1986;161:295-298.
`2. Wallace M], Charnsangavej C, Ogawa K, et al.
`Tracheobronchial tree: expandable metallic
`stents used in experimental and clinical a -
`plications, work in progress. Radiology 1 86;
`lS8:309-312.
`3. Wright KC, Wallace 5, Charnsangavej C, Car-
`rasco CH, Cianturco C. Percutaneous endo-
`vascular stents: an experimental evaluation.
`Radiolog l985;l56:69-72.
`4. Palmaz]
`, Windeler SA, Garcia F, Tio F0,
`Sibbitt RR, Reuter SR. Atherosclerotic rabbit
`aortas: expandable intraluminal grafting. Ra-
`diology I986; 1601723-726.
`.
`5. Takebayashi J, Kamatani M, Namba S. Kata-
`gami Y, Hayashi K. Early reparative process
`of implanted arterial prosthesis: a morpho-
`logical and hematological study. J Surg Res
`I974; l7:l02-ll0.
`6. Sauvage LR. Externally supported, non-
`crimped. external-velour. weft-knitted Da-
`cron prosthesis for axillofemoral, femoropo-
`pliteal, and femorotibial bypass. ln: Wrig t
`CB, ed. Vascular grafting: clinical applica-
`PSG. 1983.168-l 6.
`tions and technicgues. Boston: John Wright-
`7. Herring MB, Dilley R. Jersild RA, lr., Boxer L.
`Gardner A, Clover I. Seedin arterial pros-
`theses with vascular endothe ium. Ann Surg
`1979; l90:84—90.
`'
`8. Mason RC. The interaction of blood hemo-
`static elements with artificial surfaces. Prog
`Hemost Thromb 1972; 1:141-I64.
`9. Warren BA. Brock LC. The electron micro-
`scopic features and fibrinolytic properties of
`"neo-intima." Br] Exp Palhol I964; 45:6l2-
`617.
`10. Herring MB. Endothelial seeding of blood
`flow. ln: Wright CB, ed. Vascular grafting:
`John Wrig t-PSC, 1983; 275-314.
`clinical applications and techniques. Boston:
`ll. Sauvage LR. Ber er KE. Wood 5), Yates SC,
`Smith )C, Mans ield PB.
`lnterspecies healing
`10 :698-705.
`ofgorous arterial prostheses. Arch Surg 1974;
`
`
`
`a.
`
`Figure 4.
`(a) Photomicrograph of cross section of abdominal aorta shows Dacron
`graft (short arrow) covered by thick neo-intima on its lu-
`minal surface. A layer of cells resembling endothelium is seen at the luminal surface 0
`fthe neo-intima (long arrow). The large smooth holes
`in the neo-intima represent a cross section through the internal stent wires. (b) "Pleated" graft has longitudinal peaks and valleys. Note rel-
`al surface. There is also recanalization within the
`atively more filling by the neo-intima in the valleys, in attempt to produce an even lumin
`ma.
`neo-intima and in the fibroproliferative response between the Dacron graft and the native vessel. Arrow points to region of the native inti-
`
`360 o Radinloev
`
`Mav
`
`1987
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029, 1%
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1029, p. 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket