throbber
European Heart Journal (1992) 13, 704—708
`
`Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves.
`Description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results
`with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs
`
`H. R. ANDl5RSEN"‘, L. L. KNUl)SF.N* AND J. M. HASBNKAMT
`
`Departments of “Cardiology, l'Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. and the Institute of Experimental Clinical
`Research, Skejby University Hospital. Aarhus, Denmark
`
`KEY WORDS: Expandable stent—valve, transluminal implantation, prosthetic heart valve, pigs.
`
`A new artificial aortic valve prosthesis was developedfor implantation by the transluminal catheter technique wit/tout
`tlzoracotomy or extracorporal circulation. The new heart valve was prepared by mounting a porcine aortic valve into an
`expandable stent. Before implantation, the stent—valve was mounted on a balloon catheter and compressed around the
`deflated balloon. The stent——valve mounted balloon catheter was then advanced retrogradely to _the ascending aorta or the
`aortic root in anaesthetized pigs. Implantation was performed by balloon inflation which expanded the stent valve to a
`diameter exceeding the internal diameter of the vessel -— thus ensuring a stablefixation against the vessel wall. A total of
`nine implantations were performed in seven 70 kg closed chest pigs. Sub- and supracoronary implantation was performed in
`two and three pigs, respectively, while implantation in both positions was done in two. Angiographic and ltaemodynamic
`evaluation after implantation revealed no significant stenosis { <16 mmHg) in any of the nine valves and trivial regurgi~
`tation in only two. Complications were associated with restriction of the coronary blood flow in three animals. This
`preliminary study indicates that artificial aortic valves can be implanted in closed chest animals by transluminal catheter
`technique.
`
`Introduction
`
`in l952. Hufnagel and Harvey” performed the first
`implantation ofa prosthetic heart valve in a patient with
`severe aortic regurgitation. The artificial valve was
`implanted in the descending thoracic aorta and prevented
`severe regurgitation to the left vcntriclem. This technique
`was used in small series of operations for aortic regurgi-
`tation“). The development of extracorporal circulation
`made it possible for Harken et al.
`to perform the first
`subcoronary implantation in I960”), and since then,
`implantation of prosthetic heart valves has been an open
`heart surgical procedure. If, however, implantation could
`be accomplished without
`thoracotomy,
`it would be
`attractive.
`In 1989. we constructed a new artificial heart valve
`designed for implantation by transluminal catheter tech-
`nique without
`thoracotomy and heart surgeryl°1_ This
`paper describes the new prosthetic heart valve,
`the
`implantation technique, and the initial preliminary results
`with implantation in the sub~ and supracoronary position
`in pigs.
`
`Material and methods
`
`A NEW CO.\1CI:‘l’T FOR IMPLANT/\TION or ARTIFICIAL HI~:AItT
`vAI.vI:s
`
`The idea was conceived ofmounting a foldablc biologi-
`cal cardiac valve inside a balloon expandable metalic
`C'tIrre.I]70ttd?nt‘€.
`ilenning Rud Andersen. MD. Department of Cardiology.
`Skejby University Hospital. Brendstrupgaardsvej. DK—8200 Aurhus N.
`Duntnnrk.
`
`0l9S-()68X/‘)2.’050'l04 -l- 05 $03.00/'0
`
`stent. Implantation of such a device (stcnt+valvc=the
`stcnt~valve), would enable implantation of artificial heart
`valves by the transluminal catheter, technique.
`The stem was constructed of two 0-55 mm surgical
`stainless steel wires (monofilamcnt), each folded in IS
`loops (Fig. 1(a)). Three of the loops were 14 mm high.
`designed to the commisures ofa porcine aortic valve. The
`remaining loops in the first wire and all the second wire
`loops were 8 mm high. Each folded wire was bent into a
`circle (diameter, 22 mm) which was closed end-to—cnd by
`soldering. The two circles were then stacked upon each
`other and intcrfixcd by Mcrsclinc 2-0 sutures (Fig. 1(a)).
`The foldable valve was a porcine aortic valve taken
`from a 90 kg slaughtered pig (mixed Danish Landrace
`and Yorkshire). The aortic valve was carefully dissected
`and cleaned manually to remove unwanted material. The
`diameter,
`thickness, and height of the cleaned valve
`annulus was 27 mm, l mm, and 2mm. respectively. The
`height 0!‘ the three cornmisural sites were 8 mm.
`The stent—valve was prepared by mounting the cleaned
`aortic valve inside the stent (Fig. l(b) and (c)). The aortic
`annulus, which included the three commissural sites, were
`fixed to the metalic stent by 45-50 Prolene 5-0 sutures.
`The external diameter of the stent—-valve was approxi-
`mately I2 mm when collapsed (Fig.
`l(d) and (c)), and
`32 mm when entirely expanded (Fig. l(l) and (g)). After
`the stent--—valve had been manually compressed on the
`carrier balloon catheter. the stiffness of the metal pre-
`vented it from uncoiling spontaneously (Fig. l(d) and (c)).
`After expansion.
`the stillness ol‘ the metal minimized
`spontaneous recoil, when the balloon was deflated (Fig.
`l(i) and (g)). However, a small recoil (< l0"/n diameter
`
`© 1992 The European Society of Cardiology
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017,—
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p. 1 of 5
`
`

`
`Implantation 0/'(1rIift'c'z'rI/heart valves
`
`705
`
`Figure I The stem was constructed with two 0-55 mm stainless steel wires Folded in IS loops (at). A three-leallet
`porcine aortic valve was mounted inside the stent and fixed to the metal by sutures to form the stcnt- -valve (h) and (c).
`Before implantation the stcnt—valvc was mounted on a deflated three-foiled balloon dilatalinn catheter (d). The
`diameter of the collapsed stent~—valve was 12 mm (d) and (e). Balloon inflation expanded the stent —valve to an
`external diameter of 32 mm (1) and (g). Each of the three balloons were mounted with two elastic blocks (indicated by
`arrows). to prevent migration ofthc stent—valvc from the middlcof the hallnnns.
`
`reduction) was often seen during balloon deflation. After
`preparation, the stcnt~valves were kept frozen (~20 °C)
`until
`implantation some days later. Since only acute
`studies were performed in this initial phase, the valves
`were neither sterilized. heparinized nor treated by drugs
`or chemical agents.
`The carrier balloon catheter used For implantation
`was a conventional No. 12 F three-foiled aortic valvulo-
`plasty balloon dilatation catheter (Schneider, Zurich,
`Switzerland). Each of the three balloons was 70 mm long
`and had a diameter of‘ IS mm. The total diameter of the
`three balloons were 31 mm when inflated. Two soft rubber
`blocks (3 mm high) were mounted on each of the three
`
`balloons, separated by a distance of18 mm (Fig. l(d) and
`(D). The blocks ensured the stent --valve's stable position in
`the middle of the balloons, and avoided migration during
`catheter advancement and balloon inflation. The carrier
`balloon catheter was mounted in a self-constructed
`No. 41 F flexible introducer sheath (external diameter
`l3-6 mm, internal diameter 125 mm, length 75 cm). The
`stentvvalve loaded carrier balloon catheter was retracted
`into the introducer sheath during intravascular introduc-
`tion and advancement to minimize friction against the
`vessel wall. A standard guidewire, 300 cm long and 0-9 mm
`in diameter, was used for conventional cathcter~over-
`guidewire advancement of the carrier balloon catheter.
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p
`
`
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p. 2 of 5
`
`

`
`706 H. R. Andersen et al.
`
`
`ANIMAL PREPARATION
`
`Seven pigs weighing 70 kg (mixed Danish Landracc and
`Yorkshire) were used for implantation. The animals
`were anaesthetized, endotrachcally intubated, and venti-
`lated artificially. Surface ECG and blood pressures
`were recorded on a Sirecust 961 Monitor (Siemens: AG,
`Erlangen. Germany) and on paper by a Mingograph-62
`ink-jet galvanometer
`recorder
`(Siemens, Stockholm,
`Sweden). A No. 9 F introducer sheath was placed in the
`right carotid artery after surgical exposure of the vessel.
`A No. 8 F pigtail catheter was advanced to the ascending
`aorta through the sheath, and used for pressure monitor-
`ing and for angiography. After stent—valve implantation,
`the pigtail catheter was exchanged with a No. 8 F multi-
`purpose coronary arteriography catheter with an open
`end—hole which was advanced retrogradely through the
`stcnt—valve, and used for pressure measurements. A No.
`12 F Foley balloon catheter (Riisch, Kernen, Germany)
`with a balloon diameter of 40 mm was introduced into a
`neck vein, and advanced to the pulmonary trunk guided
`by fluoroscopy. The balloon could be inflated to decrease
`blood flow through the lungs and consequently through
`the left ventricle. This was used to minimize the high
`blood velocities past the valve prosthesis, causing pulsa-
`tilc movements of the carrier balloon catheter during
`stent-valve implantation in the heart.
`Because the femoral arteries of 70-kg pigs are only
`3-4 mm in diameter, rctroperitoneal access to the abdomi-
`nal aorta was made through a midline laparotomy. The
`aorta was exposed over a distance of 6- 7 cm cranial to the
`renal arteries and cross-clamped proximally and distttlly.
`During temporary cross-clamping, a 4crn long incision
`enabled a 8—- I0 cm long vascular prosthesis (diameter
`20mm),
`to be sutured end-to-side to the aorta at an
`angle of 45°. The prosthesis was used to gain intra-
`vasculur access for the No. 41 F introducer sheath. The
`animals were given no antiplatelet or anticoagulant
`drugs, and after implantation, angiography and pressure
`measurements,
`the pigs were exsanguinated ‘under
`continuous anaesthesia.
`
`lMl’l.ANTA’I‘l()N or "run sTaNT—vAr.vn
`
`The guidcwirc was advanced retrogradely into the
`left ventricle under continuous fluoroscopy. and subse-
`quently,
`the introducer sheath was advanced over the
`guidewire into the descending thoracic aorta. The carrier
`balloon catheter was then pushed out from the sheath and
`advanced further around the aortic arch. For supracor-
`onary implantation, the stent~valve was positioned just
`beneath where the right brachiocephalic artery started.
`For subcoronary implantation the stent—valve was pos-
`itioncd in the aortic root/left ventricular outflow tract
`beneath the coronary arteries at the level of the native
`aortic valve. The position ofthe stent---valve was guided by
`transthoracic echocardiography and fluoroseopy in the
`initial four pigs. Due to inaccuracy of echocardiography
`(heavy echoes from the stem), the irnplantations .in the
`subsequent three pigs were guided by fluoroseopy and
`angiography. In these three experiments. ventriculogra-
`phy and aortography were recorded on videotape for
`
`immediate playback to guide the stent»-valve implan-
`tation. When the stcnt-—valve was placed in the right
`position, implantation (stent-valve expansion) was per-
`formed by balloon inflation (4 atmospheres in 15 s) which
`overdilated (overstretched) the vessel. The elastic recoil of
`the vessel secured fixation and minimized periprosthetic
`leakage. Subsequently, the deflated balloon catheter, the
`guidewire, and the sheath were withdrawn. Two pigs were
`exposed to double stent-—valve implantation with the first
`one implanted in the supracoronary position; the second
`stent—valve was advanced retrogradely through the first
`valve and implanted in the subcoronary position.
`
`MEASUREMENTS AFTER IMPLANTATION
`
`Pressure measurements were performed immediately
`after implantation. Measurements were obtained during
`slow withdrawal ofthe catheter from the left ventricle to
`the aortic arch distal to the stent—-valve. Afterwards, ven-
`triculography and aortography were obtained by contrast
`injection through the plgtail catheter (Fig. 2). Following
`exsanguination, the heart and the aorta were excised and
`gross pathological examination was performed.
`
`Results
`
`"rue IMPLANTATION YROCEDURB
`
`The introducer sheath was easily inserted through the
`vascular prosthesis and advanced to the thoracic aorta
`guided by fluoroscopy. Before balloon inflation (stent-—
`valve expansion) the carrier balloon was kept easily in a
`stable position in the blood-stream. When the carrier bal-
`loon was inflated, the blood-flow carried it approximately
`another 3 -4 mm distally (downstream). The pulmonary
`artery balloon was inflated in two pigs. both with sub-
`coronary implantation, because of pulsatile movements
`of the carrier balloon. The blood-flow could be totally
`obstructed for a short period (10-15 s,
`if needed), or
`decreased for a longer time (min). The latter method was
`used in two animals (Nos 5 and 6). Seven pigs had nine
`stcnt--valves implanted (four in the subcoronary and five
`in the supracoronary position; Table l).
`
`HAEMODYNAMICS AND ANGIOGRAPHY
`
`All the animals survived the initial post-implant period;
`and pressure measurement and angiography was ac-
`complished (Table l). None of the stent-valves caused
`severe stenosis and only trivial contrast regurgitation
`was seen in two pigs (Nos 1 and 3). Left ventricular end-
`diastolic pressures were unchanged after stent~—valve
`implantation in live out ofseven pigs, but increased in two
`(Nos 3 and 4) due to left ventricular failure caused by
`restriction ofthe coronary blood-flow.
`
`ANATOMICAL FINDINGS
`
`All nine prosthetic valves were undamaged by the
`implantation procedure, and the sutures kept the biologi-
`cal valves inside the stents stable. No haematoma, bleed-
`ing or aortic dissection was seen in any of the seven pigs.
`Four pigs, in which no mechanical complications were
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p._
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p. 3 of 5
`
`

`
`Implantation o_far11/icia/ heart valves
`
`707
`
`Figure 2 Angiography showing slcnt-valves (indicated by arrows) implanted in suhcoronary position (a) and
`supracoronary position (b). an: aorta. LV: left ventricle.
`
`Table I Hloadpremrure measurementsfollowing stem valve imp/anlalion
`
`
`
`.
`Egg
`'
`
`.
`Suagval
`
`Site ofimplantation
`
`Blood pressure (mmHg)
`
`Subcoronary
`
`M
`Supracoronary
`
`Left ventricle
`
`Above
`subcoronary
`stent~~valve
`
`Below
`supracoronary
`stentvvalvc
`
`Above
`supracoronary
`stent- valve
`
`100/60
`100/60
`100/0
`2-5
`1
`105/75
`—
`120/7
`2-5
`2
`—-
`60/35
`64/30
`0-25
`3
`40/ 17
`~
`—
`43/18
`0-25
`4
`-
`~
`134/97
`150/—5
`+
`1-5
`5
`103/58
`102/58
`100/60
`I10/0
`+
`l~
`2-5
`6
`100/57
`100/57
`-—
`115/6
`+
`2-0
`7
`
`
`+
`
`+
`
`+
`+
`
`+
`
`100/60
`105/75
`
`seen. fulfilled the study's protocol. In three animals, the
`coronary flow was restricted.
`With supracoronary implantation, all five stem-«valves
`were fixed in the ascending aorta; the aortic diameter was
`overstretchcd by 3-4 mm. Four of the five stcnt—valves
`were positioned more than 1-5 cm above the genuine
`valves; none of the valves obstructed the brachiocephalic
`artery. in one animal (No. 4), in which the stent—valvc was
`implanted 3 mm above the native aortic valve, the stent—
`valve was competent, thus leaving only a small volume
`of blood between the native valve and the stent--valve
`available for coronary flow in diastole. This caused ST
`elevation and pump failure. All
`the stent—valves were
`competent at inspection and without coagulated blood on
`the cusps. H owever, small thrombi were seen on the metal
`and sutures.
`With subcoronary implantation, all stcnt—valves were
`implanted at the level of the genuine valves which were
`completely compressed between the metal stent and the
`vessel/heart wall. Two of the four stcnt-—valves were
`
`implanted beneath the origin ofthe coronary arteries. The
`other two (Nos 3 and 5) restricted coronary flow. In pig
`No. 3. both coronary arteries were obstructed. and the pig
`died due to pump failure. In pig No. 5 the left coronary
`ostium was free of the stcrtt-valve, but the right coronary
`artery was partially obstructed. This animal was haemo~
`dynamically stable, but died suddenly from ventricular
`fibrillation 1-Sh after implantation. Mild regurgitation
`at aortography was found in two stent valves. This was
`caused by tightness of one of thc stent-valve cusps in one
`case (probably caused by the preparation); in the other
`there was a small paraprosthetic leak.
`
`Discussion
`
`IMPLANTATION or PROSTIIETIC HEART VALVES WITHOUT
`'I'll0RACOTOMY
`
`This paper presents the first description and prelimi~
`nary results of a new expandable artificial heart valve
`designed for pennanent implantation by transluminal
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017,fl
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p. 4 of 5
`
`

`
`708
`
`II. R. Anderson et al.
`
`
`
`thoracotomy. Catheter-
`technique without
`catheter
`mounted valves have previously been constructed for
`short-term treatment of acute aortic insulficiencylml.
`These devices were mounted on long catheter wires which
`extended out through the vessel wall. Their position in
`the bloodstream was secured by external fixation of the
`extending catheter wires to the skin. Consequently, such
`valves were not suitable for permanent implantation. In
`contrast, the new stent—valvc is fixed intravascularly at
`the site ofimplantation without stent material projecting
`into the bloodstream or penetrating the vessel wall, thus
`making it more suitable for permanent implantation.
`
`THE STENT—VALVE
`
`The present devices were self~constructed from avail-
`able materials. The ()-55 mm wire fulfilled the criteria
`of minimal spontaneous ‘uncoil’ and ‘recoil’ after com-
`pression and dilatation. If the metal loops were longer
`than 8 mm, it was much easier to dilate the stent, but this
`resulted in larger deformation by the opposing elastic
`recoil from the vessel and/or the heart. If the loops were
`smaller, the stent was too still‘ to be fully expanded by
`the balloon. We used biological valves, because they
`were easy to obtain and mount inside the stent. Other
`types of foldable valves may also prove suitable, c.g. the
`tricuspid polyurethane heart valve""""‘.
`
`'l'Hl-2 IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE
`
`The extrathoracic approach was mandatory. As femoral
`arteries are very small in pigs we chose the abdominal
`aortic route for catheterization. Obviously, the femoral
`route should be used in humans, preferentially by a percu-
`taneous approach, alternatively by artcriotomy. Implan-
`tation was easy in both the ascending and descending
`aortas“) where small movements of the carrier balloon
`catheter were not critical. However, with subcoronary
`implantation such movements proved to be a problem. A
`catheter which does not obstruct the blood—llow during
`stent—vvalve expansion could be the solution.
`
`LlMl'l‘ATl()NS or THE srunv AND FUTURE TECHNICAL
`DEVELOPMENTS
`
`This is a very preliminary technical study, and many
`important questions remains to be answered about the
`stent—valvc. Since only acute studies were performed the
`long-term durability of the valve is unknown. Questions
`
`regarding neointimalization. calcification, thrombogeni-
`city, and dislodgement during long-term follow-up
`should be addressed. There may be a risk ofdislodgement
`and distal migration due to long-term gradual dilation or
`even necrosis ofthe portion of the aorta where the valve is
`implanted. Furthermore, valvular or aortic pathology,
`such as calcium, vegetative debris, fibrosis, and abscess
`formation could prevent accurate fixation or become a
`source of embolization. Thus, many more complex and
`long~term animal studies must be performed before even
`speculation concerning clinical use is begun.
`
`POSSIBLE CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
`
`This preliminary feasibility study cannot clarify the
`clinical applicability of the stent~valve. However, it might
`be a treatment for patients with aortic regurgitation who
`are not candidates for open heart surgery. Implantation
`of the stent—valvc in a supracoronary position may
`protect the left ventricle from severe regurgitation""l.
`
`This study was supported by a grant from the Danish Heart
`Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
`
`References
`
`[2]
`
`[ll Hufnagel CA. Harvey WI’. The surgical correction of aortic
`regurgitation. Preliminary Report, Bull. Georgetown Univ."
`Med. Center 1953; 6: 34.
`l-lufnugcl CA. Basic concepts in the development of cardio-
`vascular prosthcses. Am J Surg I979; I37: 285-300.
`[3] Hufnngel CA. Harvey WP. Rabil Pl, McDermott TF. Surgical
`correction ofaortic insutllcicncy. Surgery l954; 35: 673-83.
`[4] Conklin WS, Grismer JT. Aalpocl JA. Hufnagel valve surgery
`for aortic insufiiciency. J Thoracic Surg l958; 36: 238-46.
`[5] Harken DIE, Sorofi HS, Taylor WJ, Lefemine AA. Gupta SK.
`Lunzcr 3. Partial and complete prosthesis in aorta insullicicncy.
`J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg I960; 40: 74442,
`[6] Andersen HR, Knudsen LL, Hasenkam JM. Trtmsluminal
`catheter implantation of a new expandable artificial cardiac
`valve (the stent—valvc) in the aorta and the beating heart of
`closed chest pigs (Abstract). Eur Heartl 1990; l
`l (Suppl): 224a.
`[7] Borctos JW, Polrer RA. Aortic heart valve catheter. United
`States Patent (No. 4.056.854), l977.
`[8] Moulopoulos S. Catheter mounted artificial heart valve for
`implanting in close proximity to a defective natural heart valve.
`United States Patent (No. 3.671.979), I972.
`[9] Lo HB, Herold M, Reul H er al. A tricuspid polyurethane heart
`valve as an alternative to mechanical prostheses or hiopros-
`theses. Trans Am Soc Artiflntem Organs 1988; 34: 839-44.
`[l0] Hilbert SL, Ferrans VJ, Tomila Y, Eidbo BE. Jones M.
`Evaluation of explanted polyurethane trileallet cardiac valve
`prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg I987; 94: 4 l9~29.
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p—
`
`Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, et al. Exhibit 1017, p. 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket