throbber
Thorax (1968), 23, 338.
`
`A technique for complete replacement of
`the ascending aorta
`
`HUGH BENTALL AND ANTONY DE BONO
`From the Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, and Hammersmith Hospital
`
`A technique for complete replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta in cases of
`aneurysm of the ascending aorta with aortic valve ectasia is described. The proximal aortic
`root was too attenuated to afford anchorage to the aortic prosthesis, so this was sutured to
`the ring of a Starr valve and the prostheses were inserted en bloc. The ostia of the coronary
`arteries were anastomosed to the side of the aortic prosthesis.
`
`Aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta is
`often associated with ectasia of the aortic valve
`ring and presents clinically as aortic incompetence.
`In Marfan's syndrome or cystic medial necrosis
`this may develop with dramatic suddenness in an
`ostensibly healthy individual.
`The dilatation of the valve ring makes repair or
`replacement with other than a prosthetic valve
`difficult. The aneurysm, which is either a true
`dilatation or dissection, is best treated by excision
`and replacement with a tubular prosthesis, as the
`wall is invariably attenuated. This is not difficult
`provided that the aorta distal to the aneurysm and
`proximal to the arch is suitable for anastomosis.
`Proximally, in most cases, the aortic prosthesis
`can be sutured to a rim of aorta, leaving the
`coronary ostia undisturbed, while a valve pros-
`thesis is placed in the usual sub-coronary position
`Bloodwell,
`Beall,
`Hallman, and De
`(Cooley,
`Bakey, 1966).
`However, it sometimes happens that the root of
`the aorta is so involved in the disease process
`that the wall is too attenuated to be sutured to
`the proximal end of the aortic prosthesis. In this
`situation the management of the coronaries is the
`main concern of the surgeon.
`
`CASE REPORT
`
`A man aged 33 years had been in excellent health
`until a few months before admission, when his wife
`had noticed a loud cardiac murmur and he developed
`regurgitation.
`signs and symptoms of gross aortic
`Angiocardiography showed a large aneurysmal dilata-
`tion of the ascending aorta, not involving the vessels
`of the arch but associated with free aortic regurgita-
`
`tion. He was in incipient cardiac failure with an
`effective cardiac output of 1.8 l./min./m.2
`A mid-sternal thoracotomy revealed a
`OPERATION
`large globular dilatation of the ascending aorta. Its
`bulging inelastic wall was so thin that blood could
`be seen eddying within. Figure 1 gives an idea of the
`attenuation of the wall.
`Total cardiopulmonary bypass was established, and,
`after cross-clamping the aorta distal to the aneurysm,
`the aorta was opened, and the coronaries were can-
`nulated and perfused in the usual way. The aortic
`valve ring was much dilated and the wall was
`extremely thinned down to the ring.
`It was clear that it would not be possible to join
`the aortic wall above the coronaries to an aortic pros-
`thesis. It was therefore decided to suture the tube
`prosthesis directly to the ring of a Starr valve. A No.
`13 Starr valve was sutured to one end of a crimped
`Teflon aortic prosthesis, as shown in Figure 2. The
`aortic cusps having been excised, sutures were placed
`in the aortic ring and through the Starr valve ring.
`the Starr valve and the
`fixing
`These were tied,
`attached Teflon tube.
`At this stage the coronary cannulae were outside
`the lumen of the aortic replacement. Holes were cut
`in the aortic prosthesis at the site of the coronary
`ostia, which were then re-cannulated, this time through
`the lumen of the tube (Fig. 3). The aortic wall was
`sutured to the perimeter of the holes in the Teflon
`tube, thus reincorporating the coronary ostia within
`the new aorta.
`The distal anastomosis was then completed, leaving
`a vertical slit (Fig. 3 (5)) through which the coronary
`cannulae were removed and air was evacuated. This
`was then closed with a clamp while the aortic clamp
`was released and retrograde coronary perfusion was
`started again without any delay. The wall of the
`aneurysm was closed over the prosthesis.
`The patient made an uneventful recovery and
`remains well after nine months.
`338
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Edwards Lifesciences v. Boston Scientific Scimed
`IPR2017-00060 U.S. Patent 8,992,608
`Exhibit 2006
`
`

`

`A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta
`
`339
`
`Section of aortic aneurysm just above aortic valve, showing extreme thinning. Wall
`FIG. 1.
`about one-tenth normal thickness. (L.E.H. V.G. x 40.)
`
`Teflon
`
`Vl
`
`Starr
`valve
`
`Starr valve has been sutured to aortic prosthesis:
`FIG. 2.
`sutures have been placed in aortic ring before fixing the
`combined prostheses.
`
`The technique used is reported as it offers an
`alternative method of dealing with this type of
`aortic disease when the whole of the ascending
`aorta has to be replaced.
`
`Combined prostheses in situ. Insets I to 4 show
`FIG. 3.
`details of holes fashioned in the side wall of the Teflon
`tube to
`reincorporate the coronary ostia within
`the
`lumen of the new ascending aorta. Inset S shows the
`vertical slit in the prosthesis.
`
`REFERENCE
`Cooley, D. A., Bloodwell, R. D., Beall, A. C., Hallman, G. L., and
`De Bakey, M. E. (1966). Surgical management of aneurysms
`of the ascending aorta. Surg. Clin. N. Amer., 46, 1033.
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket