throbber
J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 673-679
`J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 673-679 (cid:9)
`
`673
`673
`
`Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of U-100592 and U-100766, Two
`Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of U-100592 and U-100766, Two
`Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agents for the Potential Treatment of
`Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agents for the Potential Treatment of
`Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
`Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
`
`Steven J. Brickner,* Douglas K. Hutchinson, Michael R. Barbachyn, Peter R. Manninen, Debra A. Ulanowicz,
`Steven J. Brickner,* Douglas K. Hutchinson, Michael R. Barbachyn, Peter R. Manninen, Debra A. Ulanowicz,
`Stuart A. Garmon, Kevin C. Grega, Susan K. Hendges, Dana S. Toops, Charles W. Ford, and Gary E. Zurenko
`Stuart A. Garmon, Kevin C. Grega, Susan K. Hendges, Dana S. Toops, Charles W. Ford, and Gary E. Zurenko
`Upjohn Laboratories, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001
`Upjohn Laboratories, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001
`
`Received December 22, 1995®
`Received December 22, 1995X
`
`Bacterial resistance development has become a very serious clinical problem for many classes
`Bacterial resistance development has become a very serious clinical problem for many classes
`of antibiotics. The 3-aryl-2-oxazolidinones are a relatively new class of synthetic antibacterial
`of antibiotics. The 3-aryl-2-oxazolidinones are a relatively new class of synthetic antibacterial
`agents, having a new mechanism of action which involves very early inhibition of bacterial
`agents, having a new mechanism of action which involves very early inhibition of bacterial
`protein synthesis. We have prepared two potent, synthetic oxazolidinones, U-100592 and
`protein synthesis. We have prepared two potent, synthetic oxazolidinones, U-100592 and
`U-100766, which are currently in clinical development for the treatment of serious multidrug-
`U-100766, which are currently in clinical development for the treatment of serious multidrug-
`resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections caused by strains of staphylococci, streptococci,
`resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections caused by strains of staphylococci, streptococci,
`and enterococci. The in vitro and in vivo (po and iv) activities of U-100592 and U-100766
`and enterococci. The in vitro and in vivo (po and iv) activities of U-100592 and U-100766
`against representative strains are similar to those of vancomycin. U-100592 and U-100766
`against representative strains are similar to those of vancomycin. U-100592 and U-100766
`demonstrate potent in vitro activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A novel and practical
`demonstrate potent in vitro activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A novel and practical
`asymmetric synthesis of (5S)-(acetamidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones has been developed and is
`asymmetric synthesis of (5S)-(acetamidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones has been developed and is
`employed for the synthesis of U-100592 and U-100766. This involves the reaction of
`employed for the synthesis of U-100592 and U-100766. This involves the reaction of
`N-lithioarylcarbamates with (R)-glycidyl butyrate, resulting in excellent yields and high
`N-lithioarylcarbamates with (R)-glycidyl butyrate, resulting in excellent yields and high
`enantiomeric purity of the intermediate (R)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-oxazolidinones.
`enantiomeric purity of the intermediate (R)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-oxazolidinones.
`
`Introduction
`against the emerging and currently problematic Gram-
`Introduction
`against the emerging and currently problematic Gram-
`positive pathogens MRSA, methicillin-resistant coagu-
`positive pathogens MRSA, methicillin-resistant coagu-
`The increasing incidence of multidrug resistance
`The increasing incidence of multidrug resistance
`lase-negative staphylococci, VRE, and penicillin-resis-
`lase-negative staphylococci, VRE, and penicillin-resis-
`among Gram-positive bacterial pathogens represents
`among Gram-positive bacterial pathogens represents
`tant pneumococci,16 as well as the perceived looming
`tant pneumococci,16 as well as the perceived looming
`one of the major challenges in the 1990’s for health care
`one of the major challenges in the 1990's for health care
`threat of a vancomycin-resistant S. aureus.
`threat of a vancomycin-resistant S. aureus.
`practitioners.1-3 One particularly unsettling milestone
`practitioners." One particularly unsettling milestone
`In a 1978 patent17 issued to the EI DuPont de
`In a 1978 patent12 issued to the EI DuPont de
`has been the acquisition of resistance to vancomycin,4
`
`has been the acquisition of resistance to vancomycin,4
`Nemours & Co., Inc., a series of 5-(halomethyl)-3-aryl-
`Nemours & Co., Inc., a series of 5-(halomethyl)-3-aryl-
`an antibiotic generally regarded as the agent of last
`an antibiotic generally regarded as the agent of last
`2-oxazolidinones were claimed to have activity against
`2-oxazolidinones were claimed to have activity against
`resort for serious Gram-positive infections.
`Isolated
`resort for serious Gram-positive infections. Isolated
`certain plant pathogens. Subsequent reports detailed
`reports from U.S. and U.K. hospitals have begun
`certain plant pathogens. Subsequent reports detailed
`reports from U.S. and U.K. hospitals have begun
`a (5R)-(hydroxymethyl)-3-aryl-2-oxazolidinone, S-6123,18
`describing what is an alarming escalation in the per-
`
`a (5R)-(hydroxymethyl)-3-aryl-2-oxazolidinone, S-6123,18
`describing what is an alarming escalation in the per-
`centage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE)
`which demonstrated weak in vitro antibacterial activity
`
`centage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) which demonstrated weak in vitro antibacterial activity
`
`clinical isolates.5,6 Since VRE strains also carry resis-
`against human pathogens.19 Further optimization20,21
`clinical isolates.5,6 Since VRE strains also carry resis-
`19 Further optimization29,21
`against human pathogens.
`tance to virtually all other known antibiotics,7 the
`led to the description in 1987 of two drug candidates,
`
`tance to virtually all other known antibiotics,2 the
`led to the description in 1987 of two drug candidates,
`prognosis for patients with such refractory infections
`prognosis for patients with such refractory infections
`DuP 721 and DuP 105, members of a new class of
`DuP 721 and DuP 105, members of a new class of
`is grim; associated mortality rates above 35% have been
`is grim; associated mortality rates above 35% have been
`parenterally and orally active, totally synthetic (5S)-
`
`parenterally and orally active, totally synthetic (5S)-
`reported.8
`reported.8
`(acetamidomethyl)-3-aryl-2-oxazolidinone antibacterial
`(acetamidomethyl)-3-aryl-2-oxazolidinone antibacterial
`A problem of much larger dimension is the escalating
`A problem of much larger dimension is the escalating
`agents.22
`agent 5.22
`incidence of the more virulent, methicillin-resistant
`incidence of the more virulent, methicillin-resistant
`The oxazolidinones have a novel mechanism of action
`The oxazolidinones have a novel mechanism of action
`Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among clinical isolates
`
`Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among clinical isolates
`that involves the inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis
`that involves the inhibition ofbacterial protein synthesis
`found throughout centers worldwide.9 As with the VRE,
`found throughout centers worldwide.9 As with the VRE,
`at a very early stage, prior to chain initiation.23 DuP
`23 DuP
`at a very early stage, prior to chain initiation.
`many MRSA strains are resistant to most other anti-
`many MRSA strains are resistant to most other anti-
`721 demonstrated potent activity vs Gram-positive
`721 demonstrated potent activity vs Gram-positive
`biotics;10,11 however, as yet, MRSA strains have re-
`biotics;19,11 however, as yet, MRSA strains have re-
`pathogens (including MRSA),24 Gram-negative anaer-
`pathogens (including MRSA),24 Gram-negative anaer-
`mained susceptible to vancomycin. The sobering emer-
`mained susceptible to vancomycin. The sobering emer-
`obes, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.25 The in vitro
`
`obes, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.25 The in vitro
`gence of VRE pales in the face of projections from
`gence of VRE pales in the face of projections from
`development of bacterial resistance to either DuP 721
`development of bacterial resistance to either DuP 721
`numerous infectious diseases experts,12,13 who are of the
`
`numerous infectious diseases experts,12,13 who are of the
`or DuP 105 could not be demonstrated.26 While both
`
`or DuP 105 could not be demonstrated.26 While both
`opinion there is high likelihood S. aureus will, in time,
`opinion there is high likelihood S. aureus will, in time,
`DuP 721 and DuP 105 were entered into phase I clinical
`DuP 721 and DuP 105 were entered into phase I clinical
`also naturally acquire vancomycin resistance. Noble et
`
`also naturally acquire vancomycin resistance. Noble et
`trials, the development of each was subsequently dis-
`trials, the development of each was subsequently dis-
`al.14 have observed transposon-mediated transmission
`al." have observed transposon-mediated transmission
`continued.27 In drug safety studies conducted at The
`continued.27 In drug safety studies conducted at The
`of the vancomycin resistance genes to S. aureus, from
`of the vancomycin resistance genes to S. aureus, from
`Upjohn Co.,28 it was demonstrated that (()-DuP 721
`Upjohn Co.,28 it was demonstrated that (±)-DuP 721
`a VRE (Enterococcus faecalis), in an experiment con-
`
`a VRE (Enterococcus faecalis), in an experiment con-
`exhibited lethal toxicity in the rat, when dosed orally
`exhibited lethal toxicity in the rat, when dosed orally
`ducted on the skin of a mouse.
`ducted on the skin of a mouse.
`at 100 mg/kg b.i.d. for 30 days.
`at 100 mg/kg b.i.d. for 30 days.
`This growing problem of multidrug resistance has
`This growing problem of multidrug resistance has
`recently rekindled interest in the search for new anti-
`recently rekindled interest in the search for new anti-
`biotic structural classes that inhibit or kill by novel
`biotic structural classes that inhibit or kill by novel
`mechanisms.15 Clearly there is an urgent need for the
`mechanisms.15 Clearly there is an urgent need for the
`discovery and development of new agents effective
`discovery and development of new agents effective
`
`
`0 (cid:9)0
`A
`A
`N
`0
`0 (cid:9)
`N
`\__OH
`\—OH (cid:9)
`14
`A (cid:9)
`
`0
`0
`0
`A o
`A
`N 0 ,g,
`0
`N
`
`\-1,..N"CH3 CH3
`
`H NH
`: (cid:9)
`DuP 721 R . MeCO (cid:9)DuP 721 R . MeCO \--( (cid:9)
`
`
`DuP 105 R . MeS0 H DuP 105 R . MeS0 H
`
`O
`0
`H2N'S
`ii
`0 (cid:9)
`
`
`
`S-6123 (cid:9)S-6123
`
`0022-2623/96/1839-0673$12.00/0 © 1996 American Chemical Society
`
`0022-2623/96/1839-0673$12.00/0 © 1996 American Chemical Society
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1023
`
`

`
`0
`0
`o
`n
`AND 0
`NAO
`N
`c
`\_/ H' -CH3
`-CH3
`A
`A
`
`Brickner et al.
`674 (cid:9) Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 3
`674 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 3
`Brickner et al.
`method, employing a high-temperature isocyanate-
`Realizing that oxazolidinones had promising potential
`Realizing that oxazolidinones had promising potential
`method, employing a high-temperature isocyanate—
`to address the imminent critical need for new antibacte-
`epoxide cyclization, was deemed incompatible with our
`
`to address the imminent critical need for new antibacte-epoxide cyclization, was deemed incompatible with our
`rial agents, we instituted a program to improve upon
`choices of phenyl substituents. There were also con-
`
`rial agents, we instituted a program to improve upon choices of phenyl substituents. There were also con-
`the properties of DuP 721. Herein we describe U-100592
`cerns regarding the hazards of phosgene use, which
`
`the properties of DuP 721. Herein we describe U-100592 cerns regarding the hazards of phosgene use, which
`and U-100766, two novel oxazolidinones currently in
`would be required for construction of noncommercially
`and U-100766, two novel oxazolidinones currently in
`would be required for construction of noncommercially
`clinical trials.
`available isocyanates.
`clinical trials.
`available isocyanates.
`The syntheses of U-100592 and U-100766 share a
`The syntheses of U-100592 and U-100766 share a
`common route, detailed in Scheme 1. Commencing with
`common route, detailed in Scheme 1. Commencing with
`3,4-difluoronitrobenzene, nucleophilic aromatic displace-
`3,4-difluoronitrobenzene, nucleophilic aromatic displace-
`ment, with excess piperazine (1a) or morpholine (1b),
`ment, with excess piperazine (la) or morpholine (lb),
`selectively gave the p-substituted nitrobenzene 2. Re-
`
`selectively gave the p-substituted nitrobenzene 2. Re-
`duction of 2a or 2b was followed by attachment of a
`duction of 2a or 2b was followed by attachment of a
`carbobenzoxy (CBZ) activating group to the arylamines
`
`carbobenzoxy (CBZ) activating group to the arylamines
`3 (for 3a, concomitant protection of the piperazine gave
`3 (for 3a, concomitant protection of the piperazine gave
`4a). Carbamate 4a or 4b was deprotonated with n-BuLi
`4a). Carbamate 4a or 4b was deprotonated with n-BuLi
`(THF, -78 °C), and then (R)-glycidyl butyrate [96-98%
`(THF, —78 °C), and then (R)-glycidyl butyrate [96-98%
`enantiomeric excess (ee); Lonza] was added and the
`enantiomeric excess (ee); Lonza] was added and the
`mixture slowly allowed to warm to room temperature.36
`
`mixture slowly allowed to warm to room temperature.36
`This sequence provided directly the (5R)-(hydroxy-
`This sequence provided directly the (5R)-(hydroxy-
`methyl)-2-oxazolidinone 5a or 5b in >80% yield, thus
`methyl)-2-oxazolidinone 5a or 5b in >80% yield, thus
`realizing a greater overall economy of chemical steps
`realizing a greater overall economy of chemical steps
`than the DuPont approach. As will be detailed else-
`than the DuPont approach. As will be detailed else-
`where, crucial to the success of this new approach37 was
`
`where, crucial to the success of this new approach37 was
`Results and Discussion
`the selection of lithium as the base counterion.
`the selection of lithium as the base counterion.
`Results and Discussion
`In prior disclosures, we have described (S)-3-(5¢ -
`With the alcohols 5 in hand, conversion to the (5S)-
`With the alcohols 5 in hand, conversion to the (5S)-
`In prior disclosures, we have described (S)-3-(5'-
`(acetamidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones U-100592
`and
`(acet amidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones U-100592 and
`indolinyl)-5-(acetamidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones,29
`in d olin y1)-5 -(a cet a m idom et hyl)-2-oxa zolidin on es
`,29
`U-100766 was straightforward.35 Activation as the
`U-100766 was straightforward.35 Activation as the
`wherein one of the more potent analogues, U-97456, was
`wherein one of the more potent analogues, U-97456, was
`mesylate 6 and then displacement with either potas-
`mesylate 6 and then displacement with either potas-
`substituted with a hydroxyacetyl moiety on the indoline
`substituted with a hydroxyacetyl moiety on the indoline
`nitrogen. E-370930 is an extremely active [4-(4¢ -pyridyl)-
`sium phthalimide to give 7 or with NaN3 (on laboratory
`sium phthalimide to give 7 or with NaN3 (on laboratory
`nitrogen. E-37093° is an extremely active [4-(4'-pyridyl)-
`scale) to give 8b was followed by formation of the
`scale) to give 8b was followed by formation of the
`phenyl]oxazolidinone described by DuPont. We ulti-
`phenyl]oxazolidinone described by DuPont. We ulti-
`intermediate 5-(aminomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones. This
`intermediate 5-(aminomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones. This
`mately came to focus on exploring the (S)-3-(4-piper-
`mately came to focus on exploring the (S)-3-(4-piper-
`was accomplished by deblocking of the phthalimide 7a
`7a
`was accomplished by deblocking of the phthalimide
`azinylphenyl)-5-(acetamidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones,31
`azinylpheny1)-5-(acetamidomethyl)-2-oxazolidinones,
`31
`with aqueous MeNH2 or reduction of the azide 8b.
`with aqueous MeNH2 or reduction of the azide 8b.
`based on considerations that the piperazine heterocycle
`based on considerations that the piperazine heterocycle
`Treatment of the amines with Ac2O and pyridine
`Treatment of the amines with Ac20 and pyridine
`would position the two nitrogens in similar loci to those
`would position the two nitrogens in similar loci to those
`provided U-100766 (69% overall yield from 5b, >99.8%
`found in both the 5¢ -indolinyl and the 4-(4¢ -pyridyl)-
`provided U-100766 (69% overall yield from 5b, >99.8%
`found in both the 5'-indolinyl and the 4-(4'-pyridyl)-
`ee38) and the CBZ-piperazine 9. Catalytic hydrogenoly-
`ee38) and the CBZ-piperazine 9. Catalytic hydrogenoly-
`phenyl congeners. In the piperazinyl series, we again
`phenyl congeners. In the piperazinyl series, we again
`sis of 9 provided the piperazine HCl salt 10, which was
`sis of 9 provided the piperazine HC1 salt 10, which was
`observed that an appendant hydroxyacetyl on the
`observed that an appendant hydroxyacetyl on the
`acylated with (benzyloxy)acetyl chloride. Finally, ben-
`acylated with (benzyloxy)acetyl chloride. Finally, ben-
`heterocyclic nitrogen afforded favorable antibacterial
`heterocyclic nitrogen afforded favorable antibacterial
`zylic hydrogenolytic cleavage of 11 gave U-100592 (37%
`zylic hydrogenolytic cleavage of 11 gave U-100592 (37%
`activity. Additional enhancements in in vitro and in
`activity. Additional enhancements in in vitro and in
`overall yield from 5a, >99.7% ee38).
`overall yield from 5a, >99.7% ee38).
`vivo potency were attained by fluorine substitution at
`vivo potency were attained by fluorine substitution at
`the phenyl 3-position, leading to U-100592.32 A bioi-
`U-100592 and U-100766 demonstrated excellent in
`
`U-100592 and U-100766 demonstrated excellent in
`
`the phenyl 3-position, leading to U-100592.32 A bioi-
`sostere of the piperazine, the morpholinyl analogue
`vitro activity, at potency levels similar to that of
`
`sostere of the piperazine, the morpholinyl analogue vitro activity, at potency levels similar to that of
`U-100766, contemporaneously emerged from our exten-
`vancomycin,againstmoststaphylococci(includingMRSA)
`U-100766, contemporaneously emerged from our exten-
`vancomycin, against most staphylococci (in clu din g MRS A)
`sive structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies.
`and all streptococci and enterococci strains tested
`sive structure—activity relationship (SAR) studies.
`and all streptococci and enterococci strains tested
`(selected strains, Table 1), without evidence of cross-
`(selected strains, Table 1), without evidence of cross-
`resistance to any known antibiotic in the strains tested.39
`
`resistance to any known antibiotic in the strains tested.39
`U-100766 was slightly less active than U-100592 in vitro
`
`U-100766 was slightly less active than U-100592 in vitro
`against some organisms; neither drug demonstrated
`against some organisms; neither drug demonstrated
`significant in vitro activity against Gram-negative
`significant in vitro activity against Gram-negative
`aerobes. Both drugs had good anaerobe activity and
`aerobes. Both drugs had good anaerobe activity and
`demonstrated very potent in vitro activity against M.
`demonstrated very potent in vitro activity against M.
`tuberculosis.40
`to
`
`U-100592 and U-100766 dosed orally (po) or subcu-
`U-100592 and U-100766 dosed orally (po) or subcu-
`taneously (sq) were equipotent with vancomycin admin-
`taneously (sq) were equipotent with vancomycin admin-
`istered sq vs S. aureus UC 9213 in a lethal systemic
`istered sq vs S. aureus UC 9213 in a lethal systemic
`mouse model (Table 2). Exceptional activity was also
`mouse model (Table 2). Exceptional activity was also
`seen vs aminoglycoside-resistant E. faecalis and van-
`seen vs aminoglycoside-resistant E. faecalis and van-
`comycin-resistant E. faecium in lethal systemic mouse
`comycin-resistant E. faecium in lethal systemic mouse
`models.
`models.
`Only the oxazolidinone enantiomer with a (5S)-
`Our new asymmetric synthesis of (5S)-(acetamidom-
`Only the oxazolidinone enantiomer with a (5S)-
`Our new asymmetric synthesis of (5S)-(acetamidom-
`acetamidomethyl configuration possesses antibacterial
`ethyl)-2-oxazolidinones involving the reaction of an
`ethyl)-2-oxazolidinones involving the reaction of an
`acetamidomethyl configuration possesses antibacterial
`activity.33 We desired a more viable approach to the
`N-lithioarylcarbamate with (R)-glycidyl butyrate (1) is
`
`activity.33 We desired a more viable approach to the N-lithioarylcarbamate with (R)-glycidyl butyrate (1) is
`asymmetric synthesis of these oxazolidinones than that
`applicable to the synthesis of widely divergent 3-(4-
`
`asymmetric synthesis of these oxazolidinones than that applicable to the synthesis of widely divergent 3-(4-
`afforded by the Herweh-Kauffmann procedure,34 which
`substituted-aryl)-2-oxazolidinones, (2) proceeds with
`
`afforded by the Herweh—Kauffmann procedure,34 which
`substituted-aryl)-2-oxazolidinones, (2) proceeds with
`Wang et al.35 had employed in a chiral fashion. This
`high efficiency from commercially available reagents,
`Wang et al.35 had employed in a chiral fashion. This
`high efficiency from commercially available reagents,
`
`O
`0
`II
`II
`HO
`fioo,
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`AO
`n
`A
`,c.,
`O
`N
`N
`c
`cH3
`\__1,111-, ., cH3
`
`U-100592
`U-100592
`
`A
`FI
`
`O
`0
`0 n
`A 0 n
`A
`c
`
`c.....
`N 0 (cid:9)
`N 0
`,
`\_._L N,
` CH3
`\ (cid:9)
`H CH3
`
`HN
`
`HO
`HO
`
`0
`0
`
`0
`n
`c,
` c,
`NA()
`NAo
`-cH3
`\_4,..,r
` -cH3
`•
`H
`•
`A
`
`He
`
`U-100766 (cid:9)
`U-100766 (cid:9)
`
`U-97456
`U-97456
`
`E-3709 (cid:9)
`E-3709 (cid:9)
`
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`Two Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agents
`Two Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agents
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 3 675
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 3 675
`
`Scheme 1a
`Scheme la
`
`X NH +
`X NH +
`
`
`
`NO2 NO2
`
`(a or a')
`(a or a')
`
`X N
`X N
`
`NO2 (cid:9)
`NO2 (cid:9)
`
`(b or U)
`(b or U)
`
`X= NH
`X= NH
`X= 0
`X= 0
`
`X N
`X N
`
`0
`0
`,C
`N (cid:9)
`N
`
`H H
`
`o
`o
`
`(75%) 4a X= CbzN
`(75%) 4a X= CbzN
`(91%) 4b X= 0
`(91%) 4b X= 0
`
`
`F F
`(method a, 81%) 2a X= NH
`(method a, 81%) 2a X= NH
`(method a', 98%) 2b X= 0
`(method a', 98%) 2b X= 0
`
`(c)
`(c)
`
`X - N
`X - N
`
`
`
`NH2 NH2
`
`
`F F
`method (b) 3a X= NH
`method (b) 3a X= NH
`method (IA 3b X= 0
`method (U) 3b X= 0
`
`(d,e)
`(d,e)
`
`/—\
`/—\
`X N
`X N
`
`
`
`F F
`
`yL
`yL
`
`N 0
`N 0
`\—c0H
`
`(f)
`(f)
`
`/—\
`/—\
`X N
`X N
`
`
`
`O O
`
`N 0
`N 0
`\-O-SO2CH3
`\—c0--802CH3
`
`(83%) 5a X= CbzN
`(83%) 5a X= CbzN
`(85%) 5b X= 0
`(85%) 5b X= 0
`
`6a X= CbzN
`6a X= CbzN
`6b X= 0
`6b X= 0
`
`X N
`X N
`
`X - N
`X - N
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`N0 (cid:9)
`N0 (cid:9)
`C,
`-CH3
`\-14-,
`01-13
`
`(9)
`(9)
`
`
`0 0
`(80%) 7a X= CbzN Y= N
`Y= N
`(80%) 7a X= CbzN
`0
`0
`
`
`
`(I) (i)
`
`(k)
`(k)
`
`(h)
`(h)
`—I.- (93%) 8b X= 0 (cid:9)
`--N.-
`(93%) 8b X= 0
`
`Y= N3
`Y= N3
`
`(j)
`
`X= Nebz
`9 (cid:9)
`(61%) (cid:9)
`X= Nebz
`9 (cid:9)
`(61%) (cid:9)
`(I)
`X= NH•HC-TD
`10 (cid:9)
`(94%) (cid:9)
`X= NH•HC-T
`10 (cid:9)
`(94%) (cid:9)
`X= NCOCH2OCH2Ph—J(m)
`X= NCOCH2OCH2Ph—J(m)
`11 (cid:9)
`(100%) (cid:9)
`11 (cid:9)
`(100%) (cid:9)
`(n)
`--3 (n)
`(81%) U-100592 X= NCOCH2OH
`(81%) U-100592 X= NCOCH2OH (cid:9)
`(68%) U-100766 X= 0
`(68%) U-100766 X= 0
`a (a) CH3CN, reflux or (a¢ ) (i-Pr)2EtN, EtOAc; (b) H2, 5% Pd/C, THF or (b¢ ) HCO2NH4, 10% Pd/C, THF/MeOH; (c) CBZ-Cl, NaHCO3 (or
`a (a) CH3CN, reflux or (a') (i-Pr)2EtN, EtOAc; (b) H2, 5% Pd/C, THF or (b') HCO2NH4, 10% Pd/C, THF/MeOH; (c) CBZ-Cl, NaHCO3 (or
`Na2CO3), acetone-H2O; (d) n-BuLi, THF -78 °C; (e) (R)-glycidyl butyrate; (f) MsCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2; (g) potassium phthalimide, CH3CN,
`Na2CO3), acetone—H20; (d) n-BuLi, THF —78 °C; (e) (R)-glycidyl butyrate; (f) MsCI, Et3N, CH2C12; (g) potassium phthalimide, CH3CN,
`H2O, reflux; (h) NaN3, DMF, 75 °C; (i) aqueous MeNH2, EtOH, reflux; (j) 10% Pd/C, H2, EtOAc; (k) Ac2O, pyr; (l) Pd/C, H2, MeOH-
`H2O, reflux; (h) NaN3, DMF, 75 °C; (i) aqueous MeNH2, EtOH, reflux; (j) 10% Pd/C, H2, EtOAc; (k) Ac20, pyr; (1) Pd/C, H2, Me0H—
`CH2Cl2; (m) ClCOCH2OCH2Ph, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C; (n) 10% Pd/C, H2, MeOH-CH2Cl2.
`(n) 10% Pd/C, H2, Me0H—CH2C12.
`CH2C12; (m) C1COCH2OCH2Ph, Et3N, CH2C12, 0 °C;
`
`Table 1. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration ((cid:237)g/mL)
`Table 1. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (Atg/mL)
`vancomycin
`organism
`strain number
`U-100592
`U-100766
`organism
`strain number
`vancomycin
`U-100592
`U-100766
`1
`UCa 9213
`4
`4
`Staphylococcus aureus
`Staphylococcus aureus
`1
`4
`4
`UCa 9213
`Staphylococcus aureusb
`1
`UC 12673
`2
`4
`1
`2
`4
`Staphylococcus aureusc
`UC 12673
`Staphylococcus aureus
`1
`ATCCb 29213
`4
`4
`ATCCb 29213
`1
`4
`4
`Staphylococcus aureus
`Staphylococcus epidermidis
`1
`1
`1
`1
`UC 30031
`1
`1
`Staphylococcus epidermidis
`UC 30031
`4
`ATCC 29212
`2
`4
`Enterococcus faecalis
`Enterococcus faecalis
`4
`ATCC 29212
`2
`4
`Enterococcus faecium
`UC 12712
`1
`2
`0.5
`UC 12712
`1
`2
`Enterococcus faecium
`0.5
`Streptococcus pneum on iae
`1
`0.5
`UC 9912
`0.5
`1
`Streptococcus pneumoniae
`0.5
`UC 9912
`0.5
`0.5
`UC 152
`1
`2
`Streptococcus pyogenes
`Streptococcus pyogenes
`1
`2
`0.5
`UC 152
`>64
`>64
`>64
`Escherichia coli
`ATCC 25922
`ATCC 25922
`Escherichia coli
`>64
`>64
`>64
`>64
`>64
`>64
`Klebsiella pneum on iae
`UC 12081
`Klebsiella pneumoniae
`>64
`UC 12081
`>64
`>64
`>64
`>64
`>64
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa
`ATCC 27853
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa
`>64
`ATCC 27853
`>64
`>64
`>16d
`ATCC 25285
`1
`1
`Bacteroides fragilis
`Bacteroides fragilis
`>16d
`1
`1
`ATCC 25285
`Clostridium perfringens
`ATCC 13124
`1
`1
`1e
`ATCC 13124
`1
`1
`Clostridium perfringens
`le
`Mycobacterium tuberculosis
`H37Rv
`e0.125
`e0.125
`f
`Mycobacterium tuberculosis
`H37Rv
`f
`
`a Upjohn Culture (registered trademark of The Upjohn Co.). b American Type Culture Collection. a MRSA. d Comparative control value
`a Upjohn Culture (registered trademark of The Upjohn Co.). b American Type Culture Collection. c MRSA. d Comparative control value
`for clindamycin was 0.5 (cid:237)g/mL. e Comparative control value for clindamycin was 0.06 (cid:237)g/mL. f Comparative control value for isoniazid
`for clindamycin was 0.5 itg/mL. e Comparative control value for clindamycin was 0.06 itg/mL. f Comparative control value for isoniazid
`was 0.20 (cid:237)g/mL.
`was 0.20 itg/mL.
`
`Table 2. In Vivo Antibacterial Activity ED50
`Table 2. In Vivo Antibacterial Activity ED50a (mg/kg)
`a (mg/kg)
`organism (cid:9)
`strain number
`vancomycine
`U-100766
`U-100592
`organism
`strain number
`vancomycine
`U-100766 (cid:9)
`U-100592
`Staphylococcus aureusb
`3.9
`5.6 (po)
`1.9 (po)
`UC 9213
`Staphylococcus aureusb
`5.6 (po)
`1.9 (po)
`UC 9213
`3.9
`Staphylococcus aureusb
`3.9
`2.0 (sq)
`0.9 (sq)
`UC 9213
`Staphylococcus aureusb
`2.0 (sq)
`0.9 (sq)
`UC 9213
`3.9
`<0.6
`10 (po)
`1.3 (po)
`UC 12379
`Enterococcus faecalisc
`Enterococcus faecalisb
`<0.6
`10 (po)
`1.3 (po)
`UC 12379
`>100
`
`En terococcus faecium d
`24 (po)
`12.5 (po)
`UC 15090
`Enterococcus faeciumd
`24 (po)
`12.5 (po)
`>100
`UC 15090
`
`
`a Dose that protects 50% of the animals. b Organism demonstrates intermediate in vivo resistance to methicillin. a Gentamycin resistant.
`a Dose that protects 50% of the animals. b Organism demonstrates intermediate in vivo resistance to methicillin. c Gentamycin resistant.
`d Vancomycin resistant. e Control was dosed subcutaneously.
`d Vancomycin resistant. e Control was dosed subcutaneously.
`
`Experimental Section
`and (3) following side-chain manipulation, provides the
`Experimental Section
`and (3) following side-chain manipulation, provides the
`targeted antibacterial oxazolidinones in extremely high
`targeted antibacterial oxazolidinones in extremely high
`Chemistry. Melting points were determined on a Fisher-
`Chemistry. Melting points were determined on a Fisher-
`ee. On the basis of their antibacterial potency, and
`ee. On the basis of their antibacterial potency, and
`Johns apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H NMR spectra were
`Johns apparatus and are uncorrected. 'H NMR spectra were
`acceptable pharmacokinetic41 and drug safety profiles42
`acceptable pharmacokinetic41 and drug safety profiles42
`recorded on either a Bruker AM-300 or ARX-400 spectrometer.
`recorded on either a Bruker AM-300 or ARX-400 spectrometer.
`in the rat and dog, U-100592 and U-100766 were
`Chemical shifts are reported in (cid:228) units (ppm) relative to TMS
`in the rat and dog, U-100592 and U-100766 were
`Chemical shifts are reported in 6 units (ppm) relative to TMS
`as internal standard. Coupling constants (J) are reported in
`
`as internal standard. Coupling constants (J) are reported in
`selected for development as clinical candidates. These
`selected for development as clinical candidates. These
`hertz (Hz). Electron impact (EI) mass spectra were obtained
`hertz (Hz). Electron impact (EI) mass spectra were obtained
`oxazolidinones are targeted as potential therapies for
`oxazolidinones are targeted as potential therapies for
`with an ionization voltage of 70 eV. Data are reported in the
`with an ionization voltage of 70 eV. Data are reported in the
`treating human infections caused by staphylococci,
`treating human infections caused by staphylococci,
`form m/z (rel intensity). All moisture-sensitive reactions were
`form m/z (rel intensity). All moisture-sensitive reactions were
`streptococci, and enterococci,
`including multidrug-
`streptococci, and enterococci, including multidrug-
`conducted under a nitrogen atmosphere in oven- or flame-dried
`conducted under a nitrogen atmosphere in oven- or flame-dried
`resistant strains.
`resistant strains.
`glassware. Unless specified, all commercially available sol-
`glassware. Unless specified, all commercially available sol-
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`
`676 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 3
`676 (cid:9)
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 3 (cid:9)
`
`Brickner et al.
`Brickner et al.
`
`vents and reagents were used without further purification.
`vents and reagents were used without further purification.
`THF was distilled under argon from sodium benzophenone
`THE was distilled under argon from sodium benzophenone
`ketyl prior to use. Solvent removal was accomplished by a
`ketyl prior to use. Solvent removal was accomplished by a
`rotary evaporator operating at house vacuum (40-50 Torr).
`rotary evaporator operating at house vacuum (40-50 Torr).
`Crude products were purified by medium pressure column
`Crude products were purified by medium pressure column
`chromatography over silica gel (EM Science; 230-400 mesh
`chromatography over silica gel (EM Science; 230-400 mesh
`ASTM). Alternatively, smaller scale purifications were ac-
`ASTM). Alternatively, smaller scale purifications were ac-
`complished by preparative TLC (Analtech silica gel GF plates,
`complished by preparative TLC (Analtech silica gel GF plates,
`20 (cid:2) 20 cm, 1000 (cid:237)m). Silica gel (Analtech silica gel GF, 1 (cid:2)
`20 x 20 cm, 1000 gm). Silica gel (Analtech silica gel GF, 1 x
`3 in., 250 (cid:237)m thickness) plates were utilized for TLC analyses.
`3 in., 250 gm thickness) plates were utilized for TLC analyses.
`Elemental analyses were within (0.4% of the calculated
`Elemental analyses were within ±0.4% of the calculated
`values.
`values.
`1-(2-Fluoro-4-nitrophenyl)piperazine, 2a. A solution of
`1-(2-Fluoro-4-nitrophenyl)piperazine, 2a. A solution of
`12.0 g (75.42 mmol) of 3,4-difluoronitrobenzene in 150 mL of
`12.0 g (75.42 mmol) of 3,4-difluoronitrobenzene in 150 mL of
`acetonitrile was treated with 16.24 g (188.6 mmol) of pipera-
`acetonitrile was treated with 16.24 g (188.6 mmol) of pipera-
`zine followed by warming at reflux for 3 h. The solution was
`zine followed by warming at reflux for 3 h. The solution was
`cooled to ambient temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The
`cooled to ambient temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The
`resulting residue was diluted with 200 mL of water and
`resulting residue was diluted with 200 mL of water and
`extracted with ethyl acetate (3 (cid:2) 250 mL). The combined
`extracted with ethyl acetate (3 x 250 mL). The combined
`organic layers were extracted with water (200 mL) and
`organic layers were extracted with water (200 mL) and
`saturated sodium chloride solution (200 mL) followed by drying
`saturated sodium chloride solution (200 mL) followed by drying
`(Na2SO4). The solution was concentrated in vacuo to afford
`(Na2504). The solution was concentrated in vacuo to afford
`an orange oil which was chromatographed over 450 g of silica
`an orange oil which was chromatographed over 450 g of silica
`gel eluting initially with dichloromethane until the least polar
`gel eluting initially with dichloromethane until the least polar
`fractions had eluted, and then elution was continued with 2%
`fractions had eluted, and then elution was co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket