throbber
Pergamon
`
`Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 8
`
`(1998) 1231-1236
`
`&
`BIOORGANIC
`MEDICINAL
`CHEMISTRY
`LETTERS
`
`SYNTHESIS AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF [6,5,5] AND [6,6,5]
`TRICYCLIC FUSED OXAZOLIDINONES
`
`D. Mark Gleave,*'1'"'" Steven
`J.
`Kristine 1). Lovasz,' Douglas C. Rohrcr,^
`
`Peter R. Manninen,2'1 Debra A. Allwine,t
`Brickner,2'"!"
`
`John A. Tucker,^ Gary E. Zurcnko^ and Charles W.
`
`Ford^
`
`$ fMedicinal Chemistry Research, Computer-Aided Drug Discovery, § Cancer and Infectious Diseases Research.
`
`
`Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI 49001
`
`Received 9 April 1998
`
`Abstract: A series of conformationally restricted, [6,5,5] and [6,6,5] tricyclic fused oxazolidinones were
`synthesized and tested for antibacterial activity. Several compounds in the trans-[6,5,5] series demonstrated
`potent in vitro and in vivo activity. This work provides valuable information regarding the preferred
`conformational orientation
`
`of the oxazolidinones at
`the
`binding
`
`site. Elsevier Science Ltd. All © 1998
`
`
`rights reserved.
`
`Introduction: Oxazolidinones are
`in this
`an exciting new class of antibacterial agents.3,4 Key examples
`
`compound DuP 721 (I)4 and Pharmacia & Upjohn's clinical
`class are DuPont's seminal
`candidates U-100592
`(2) and U-100766 (3a).^h,c These compounds show promising activity against multiple antibiotic resistant
`in
`
`and vitro animal models.
`
`strains of gram-posilive
`bacteria
`in
`
`Q
`
`N
`
`O
`
`Y
`
`N-
`
`A
`
`R
`
`J N O
`
`- NHAc
`
`1 (DuP 721)
`
`X
`2: X=F, Y=NC(0)CH?0H
`3a: X=F, Y=0
`(U-100766)
`3b: X=H. Y=0
`
`NHAc
`Nil Ac
`(U-100592)
`4: n=l ([6,5,5] series)
`or n=2 ([6,6,5]
`series)
`(where R is defined
`in Schemes
`
`1-4)
`
`We became interested in determining whether there was a preferred relative orientation of the aryl and
`oxazolidinone
`rings at the binding site. To answer
`this question a series of rigid oxazolidinone analogs were
`the general structure 4. These tricyclic fused oxazolidinones
`synthesized having
`
`have the aryl and oxazolidinone
`rings joined together by either a one or two-carbon linker, giving rise to the [6,5,5] and [6,6,5] series,
`respectively.
`Chemistry and Biology: The original racemic sytheses of the [6,5,5] and [6,6,5] frameworks are
`shown in Scheme l.3a'5 The two synthetic
`routes closely parallel each other; both involve the formation of a
`
`
`either to the cis or trans
`diastereomeric pair of
`
`cyanohydrins ((±)-7 (±)-8) which are separated and or
`
`converted
`series of tricyclic oxazolidinones. The first tricyclic analogs to be made and tested were the four DuP 721
`analogs (±>9b,
`
`(±)-10b, (±)-llb
`and (±)-12b. The lrans-[6,5,5] compound (±)-10b exhibited antibacterial
`(Table I). In contrast, (±)-9b.
`(±)-llb
`potency approximately
`
`one-half that of the parent (±)-DuP 721
`12b were devoid of antibacterial
`
`activity at the concentrations
`tested.
`Due to the promising activity of (±)-10b, we were encouraged
`[6,5,5] tricyclic analogs. Sulfonyl analogs were considered
`suitable
`
`to
`
`
`synthesize
`
`
`
`additional
`
`targets work from DuPont since earlier had
`
`and
`
`(±)-
`
`trans-
`
`0960 894X/98/$ 19.00 © 1998 Rlsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
`PI I: S0960-894X(98)00194-2
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1022
`
`

`
`1232
`
`D. M. Cleave et ai/Bioorg. Med. Chcm. Utt. S(IWH) 1231-1236
`
`shown that some compounds of this type demonstrate good activity.4 The chlorosulfonyl [6,5,5] tricyclic
`oxazolidinone (±)-13 was synthesized from the parent (±)-10a by treatment with chlorosulfonic acid (Scheme
`2). This compound was then used as an intermediate in the synthesis of the methanesulfonyl analog (±)-14a and
`nine sulfonamides ((±)-14b-j). (±)-14a and the N,N-dimethylsulfonamide (±)-14b exhibited only weak in
`vitro antibacterial activity (Table 1). None of the other sulfonyl analogs exhibited antibacterial activity at the
`levels tested.
`
`Scheme 1
`
`NH
`
`a-c
`
`COjEi
`
`5
`|6.5^| senes
`
`J
`
`X
`
`NHAc
`
`(±)-9a:R=H
`: [
`'—^(±>-9b: R=Ac
`
`'Q
`
`(±).10M: K=H
`±)-IOb: R-Ac
`
`O X
`
`OR
`
`N
`
`OH
`
`NC
`(±)-7: n=l, K=Bn
`(±)-8: ii=2, R=Mc
`
`il
`
`a'.b'.c*
`
`I
`
`v OMc
`
`CN
`
`(±H»
`(6,6^1 series
`
`%
`
`NHAc
`
`E
`
`J
`
`(±)-l2a: R-H
`(±)-12b: R=Ac
`(±)-12c; R=3-pyridyl
`
`Nil Ac
`
`.[C
`
`(±)-lla: R=H
`(±)-llb: K«Ac
`(±)-l Ic: R=3-pyridyl
`
`(a) Mg. MeOH, 92%; (b) CBZCI. NaHCOv 90%; (c) LIBH4, 75%; (d) oxalyl chloride. DMSO. 94%; (e) (CH^QCN^H. K2C03.
`75%; (a1) II2. Pd/C. 99%; (b) Ra-Ni, NaH2P02. 79%. (c*) TMSCN (0 DH3.DMS; (g) Ac20; (h) K2COv CH,CN 41% for 9a (3
`steps: f.g and h). 40% lur 10a (3 steps). 37% for I la (4 steps: c'.f.g and h). 43% for 12a (4 steps). (1) Ac20, M^OH, Ms20. 55%
`for 9b. 67% for 10b, 87% for I lb. 79% for I2b. (j) NBS, benzoyl peroxide then ArB(UMe)2. Pd(PPhj)4. K2HPO4. 64% for 11c.
`55% for 12c.
`
`Scheme 2
`
`(±)-10a
`
`o
`a-5
`o
`
`A
`
`NHAc
`
`(±)-I3
`
`bore
`
`9
`R-S
`o
`
`O A
`
`Nil Ac
`
`(±)-14a-j
`
`(a) ClSOjOH, 72%; (b) (i) Na^Oj, NaHCOj (ii) Mel; (c) R|R2NH. Et^N. R groups (yield from 10a): 14a, Me (28%); 14b,
`NMe2 (87%); 14c, C-CJH9NH (89%); 14d. EtNH (37%); 14e. PhCH?NH (36%); 14f, PhNH (50%); 14g, 0(CH2CH2)2N (25%);
`14h, CH2(CH5CH2)2N (64%); 14i, UOiCHJJIMt (82%); 14J. NH, (65%).
`
`A 1990 DuPont patent disclosed a variety of 3-phcnyl-5-acetamidomethyl oxazolidinones having potent
`antibacterial activities, wherein aromatic and heteroaromatic moieties were coupled at the para position of the
`phenyl ring.6 The most active analogs reported were those having 3-pyridyl, 4-pyridyl and 4-cyanophcnyi
`substituents. We wished to explore the utility of these and related groups appended to the trans-[6,5,5] tricyclic
`
`

`
`D. M. Cleave el ul. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8(1998) 1231-1236
`
`1211
`
`oxazolidinone framework. The parent tricyclic oxazulidinone (±)-10a was selectively brominalcd upon treatment
`with NBS and benzoyl peroxide to give aryl bromide (±)-15 (Scheme 3). A series of racemic aryl- and
`heteroaryl-substituted [6.5,5] tricyclic oxazolidinoncs ((±)-16a-e) were synthesized by treating (±)-15 with
`various aryl boronic acids under Suzuki palladium-catalyzed cross coupling conditions.7 The cis- and trans- 3-
`pyridyl [6,6,5] tricyclic oxazolidinones (±)-llc and (±)-12c were synthesized in an analogous manner (Scheme
`1 ) .
`
`Scheme 3
`
`(±)-10n
`
`Br
`
`i N O
`
`NHAc
`
`(±)-15
`
`b
`
`Ai
`
`A
`
`NHAc
`
`(±)-16a-«*
`
`(a) NBS, benzoyl peroxide. 98%; (b) ArD(OH)2. (PhjP^Pd. KHPO^. Ar groups (yield from 10a): 16a. Ph (36%); 16b, 3-pyridyl
`(45-65%); 16c, 4 pyridyl (55%); 16d, 4-cyanophcnyl (80%); 16*% 5-pyrimidyl (40%).
`
`Several of the rran5-[6,5,5j analogs (16a-e) had very potent antibacterial activity (Table 1); the most
`potent being the 3-pyridyl compound (±)-16b. This compound had in vitro antibacterial activity approximately
`twice as potent as (±)-DuP 721. Unfortunately, (±)-16b was found to elicit toxic effects in the rat when
`Interestingly, the /ra/zi-3-pyridyl [6,6,5] tricyclic
`administered orally at 100 mg/kg b.i.d. for 30 days.K
`oxazolidinone (±)-12c also demonstrated weak antibacterial activity (Table 1).
`An asymmetric synthesis of the parent trans-16,5,5] tricyclic molecule (±)-10a was developed so that we
`would have access to these active [6.5.5] tricyclic analogs in enantiomerically enriched form 9 (-)-10a (98.8%
`ee) was converted into the optically active DuP 721 analog (+)-10b using the same conditions employed in the
`racemic series (Scheme 1). (+)-10b was at least twice as potent in vitro as the racemate (Table 1). This indicates
`that the enantiomer having the 5-(S)-acctamidomelhyl side chain is responsible for biological activity which is in
`accord with earlier findings, in the non-tricyclic series, at DuPont.4
`
`Scheme 4
`
`F
`
`17
`
`g.h
`
`a.b.c
`
`NO2
`
`CN
`
`W"
`
`18
`
`NO2
`
`d.e.f
`
`CC^Me
`
`VyN
`(±)-20
`
`NHCBZ
`
`v c
`O
`
`OTBS
`
`O
`
`N
`
`NHCBZ
`
`19
`
`O X
`
`N O
`
`N-
`
`OH
`
`(±)-2l: R=OTBS
`(±)-22: R=NHAc
`
`R
`
`(a) Morpholinc. MeCN, 93%; (b) DIBALH, PiiCHj. 46%; (c) (CF3CH20)2P(0)CH?C02Mc, KHMDS, THE, 76%; (d) DIBALH.
`PhCH,. 91%; (e) SnClj.HjO, EtOH, 93%; (f) CBZCl, NaHCOj, 76%; (g) m-CPBA. CHC1V NaHCO,. 76%; (h) TBSCl, imidazole,
`DMF, 62%; (i) LHMDS. TIIF. 70%; (j) Bu4NF, TUP, 82%; (k) MsCI, EI3N. CH2C12, 95%; (1) NaNj, DMF, 94%; (m) H2) Pd/C,
`MeOH, 100%; (n) Ac20, pyridine, 76%.
`
`

`
`1234
`
`D. M. Cleave et ai / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. H {1998) 1231-1236
`
`Tlie morpholino tricyclic molecule 22 (Scheme 4) was chosen as a synthetic target. A priori it was
`anticipated that this molecule would have good antibacterial activity. It is the tricyclic des-fluoro equivalent of the
`current clinical candidate U-100766 (3a). Previous work in our laboratories and at DuPont suggests thai a
`fluorine substituent provides only a modest potency enhancement compared to the corresponding des-fluoro
`compounds. Earlier, more direct attempts at synthesizing 22 from the parent 10a or the aryl bromide 15 had
`proved unsuccessful10 and so an independent synthesis was developed. A strategy similar to that used in the
`asymmetric synthesis of (-)-10a was chosen.9 A key reaction in the synthesis was a novel intramolecular lithio-
`carbamate/epoxide cyclization (20 to 21). This led to the formation of both five membered rings of the tricyclic
`oxazolidinone in one step with complete regiochemical control. Surprisingly, (+)-22 exhibited poor antibacterial
`activity (Table 1).
`Discussion: A novel series of 16,5,5] and [6,6,51 tricyclic oxazolidinones has been prepared and
`examined for antibacterial activity. All cis analogs tested were inactive. In the trans series the [6,5,5]
`compounds proved much more potent than the corresponding |6,6,5] compounds. Many of the trans-[6,5,5]
`analogs had potent activity (i.e. (±) llb and (±)-16a-c), similar to that of their non-tricyclic counterparts. The
`most potent was the 3-pyridyl analog (±)-16b. Some m2W5-[6,5,5| tricyclic analogs did not follow this trend and
`had surprisingly poor antibacterial activity (i.e. (±)-14a-j and (±)-22). To account for some of these
`observations, molecular modeling studies were performed.
`Energy minimization calculations (MM2) performed on DuP 721 (1) showed that a negative torsional
`angle between the aryl and oxazolidinone rings is favored (-29° calculated for 'average' low energy
`conformations).11 This is comparable to that found in the analogous /rani-[6,5,5] compound (+)-10b (-24°
`calculated) but opposite to that found in the cis compound (±)-9b (+21° calculated).12 The activity of (±)-10b
`(ca. half that of (±)-l) and the inactivity of (±)-9b suggest that (±)-l and related compounds may bind to their
`receptor via a low energy conformation in which the torsional angle about the aryl N bond adopts a value roughly
`similar to that found in (±) 10b and other trans analogs.
`A comparison of the energy minimized structures of 10b and DuP 721 (1) (Figure 1 A) reveals a disparity
`in the orientation of the aryl ring attached to the oxazolidinone nitrogen in each of these two compounds. This
`difference arises in part from bond angle distortions introduced by the presence of a second five-member ring in
`10b. Despite rhis difference m™.?-[6,5,5] compounds, such as 10b, are still able to bind to the receptor, as
`evidenced by the high potency of 10b and the aryl series of compounds (±)-16a-e. This trend does not hold true
`for the sulfonyl analogs (±)-14a-j or for the morpholino analog (+)-22 which have much weaker activity. It is
`assumed that the small size of the acyl substituent in 10b and the planarity of the aryl substituents in (±)-16a-e
`enable those tricyclic compounds to still comfortably fit the receptor. This is not the case when the bulkier
`morpholino group is attached to the tricyclic framework or when a sulfonyl substituent is used. Clearly, subtle
`forces are in effect, and it is hoped that the synthesis and testing of additional trans-[6,$95] tricyclic analogs will
`provide further enlightenment.
`Figure IB illustrates that in trans-[6,6,5] analogs such as (±)-12b the position of the aryl ring more
`closely approximates the position of the aryl ring found in active non-tricyclic oxazolidinones such as (±)-l. A
`priori it was therefore predicted that trans-[(>,(),5] analogs would have potent antibacterial activity. This proved
`not to be the case. Their lack of activity is assumed to be due to the additional steric bulk imparted by the ethylene
`linker.
`
`

`
`D. M. Gleave et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chenu Istt. 8 (1998) 1231-1236
`
`1235
`
`Table 1.
`
`Antibacterial Activity of [6,5,5] and 16,6,5] Fused Tricyclic Ovazolidinoneb
`
`R
`
`N' O
`
`n
`
`NHAc
`
`n
`
`C.mpch
`9a
`10a
`1 1 u
`12a
`9b
`l i b
`1 2 b
`10b
`(*)10b
`14a
`14b
`14c-j
`16a
`16b
`
`1 6h.HCI
`16c
`
`16d
`16c
`1 1c
`1 2 c
`2 2
`
`C o m p a m l o r d i u ^ s
`DuP 721
`0
`(J±tll
`U-100766
`((-)-*»)
`(-)-3b
`vuiu'uinycin
`
`0
`
`0
`
`R
`II
`H
`H
`H
`Ac
`Ac
`Ac
`Ac
`Ac
`SO-Me
`SO.NMe;
`SO-NRiR:
`Ph
`3 pyridyl
`
`3-p\Tidvl.HCl
`4-pyridyl
`
`4-cyanophcnyl
`5 pyrimidyl
`3-pyndyl
`? -pyridyi
`morpholino
`
`Ac
`
`murphulino
`
`morpholino
`
`S.a.\<
`>32
`>32
`>64
`>64
`> 1 6
`>16
`> 1 6
`8
`4
`64
`64
`>64
`
`4
`
`2
`4
`
`4
`8
`>64
`32
`64
`
`2-4
`
`24
`
`4
`0.5
`
`S.a.2r
`>32
`>32
`>64
`>64
`>16
`>16
`>16
`
`4
`32
`64
`>64
`
`2
`
`2
`2
`
`4
`4
`>64
`16
`64
`
`4
`
`4
`
`4
`0.5
`
`MIC (MS/ml')*
`TP
`>^2
`>32
`>64
`>64
`>16
`>16
`> 1 6
`8
`2
`64
`64
`>64
`2
`2
`
`>32
`>32
`>64
`>64
`>16
`>16
`>16
`16
`4
`64
`.^4
`>64
`4
`2
`
`1
`2
`
`4
`>64
`Iti
`32
`
`4
`
`1
`
`2
`0 5
`
`2
`
`2
`4
`>64
`32
`128
`
`8
`
`2
`
`4
`4
`
`fefeJ £e:
`
`R f
`
`>32
`>32
`>32
`>32
`>16
`>16
`>16
`
`4
`>32
`>32
`>32
`32
`2
`
`4
`8
`
`32
`8
`>32
`>32
`>16
`
`8-16
`
`4
`
`4
`> 1 6
`
`CDcAh
`S.a.l
`
`39.5' (1.8 Vk
`
`>25J(2 2Vk
`9.4 (2.9)k
`4.4J (I.IV^
`6 0 ( 1 . 8 ) ^
`6.1 (2.1)^
`16 V (S.9V^
`17.1 (2.5 )k
`11.4 (2.5)k
`
`>20 (2.2)'
`
`9 4 (4.8^
`18 I1 (T^)1 k
`2.0-15
`
`1.1-4.8
`
`>32
`>32
`>64
`>64
`>16
`>16
`> 1 6
`
`4
`16
`64
`>64
`
`05
`
`2
`
`>64
`16
`32
`
`2
`
`0.5
`
`1
`0.5
`
`•Minimum inhibitory conccnirauon: lowest conccnirauon of diug lhai inhibits visible growth of the organism. bEffccUve dosc50:
`amount of drug required (mg/kg body weight/do^;) to cure 50% of infected mice subjected to a lethal systemic infection (drug
`administered orally) cDala IN for racemic maierial unlets otherwise noted. AStaphylococcus aureus UC (Upjohn Culture) 9213
`(mcthicillin susceptible). 9Staphylococcus aureus UCI2673 (methicillin resistant). Staphylococcus epidermidis UC 30031
`*Enterococcus faecalis UC9217. ^Streptococcus pneumoniae UC99I2. iBacteroides frag His UC12199. These values ai* for
`Staphylococcus aureus UC9271. kFigures in parenthesis arc for the vancomycin control. 'Figure in parenthesis is for the U 100592
`control, which is cquipotcnt to vancomycin.
`
`

`
`1236
`
`D. M. Cleave el al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. ten. 8 (1998) I23I-I236
`
`Overall, these studies demonstrate the feasibility of preparing active oxazolidinone antibacterial agents
`which are conformationally constrained by a linker between the oxazolidinone ring and an attached phenyl group.
`The comparative SAR of these compounds and their non-tricyclic counterparts provides a number of interesting
`insights concerning the structural requirements for antibacterial activity.
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Figure 1: Superimposition of DuP 721 (1) with; (A) r7-a/w-[6,5,51 tricyclic analog 10b and (B) fran,j-[6,6,5]
`tricyclic analog 12b.
`
`Acknowledgment: The authors thank John W. Allison, Ronda D. Schaadt and Betty H. Yagi for in
`vitro data; Judith C. Hamel and Douglas Stapert for the in vivu data.
`References and Notes:
`1. Current address; NeoRx Corporation, 410 W. Harrison, Seattle, WA 98119.
`2. Current address: Central Research, Pfizer, Inc, Groton, CT 06340.
`(a) Brickner, S.J. Current Pharmaceutical Design 1996, 2, 175; (b) Brickner, S.J.; Hutchinson, D.K.;
`3.
`Barbachyn, M.R.; Manninen, P.R.; Ulanowicz, D.A.; Garmon, S.A.; Grega, K.C.; Hendges, S.K.;
`Toops, D.S.; Zurenko, G.E.; Ford, C.W. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 673; (c) Barbachyn, M.R.;
`Hutchinson, D.K.; Brickner, S.J.; Cynamon, M.H.; Kilbum, J.O.; Klemens, S.P.; Glickman, S.E.;
`Grega, K.C.; Hendges, S.K.; Toops, D.S.; Ford, C.W.; Zurenko, G.E. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 680.
`(d) Shinabarger, D.L.; Marotti, K.R.; Murray, R.W.; Lin, A.H.; Melchior, E.P.; Swaney, S.M.; Dunyak,
`D.S.; Demyan, W.F.; Buysse, J.M. Antimicrnh. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 2132.
`4. Gregory, W.A.; Brittelli, D.R.; Wang, C.-L.J.; Wuonola, M A.; McRipley, R.J.; Eustice, D.C.; Eberley,
`V.S.; Bartholomew, P.T.; Slee, A.M.; Forbes, M. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 1673.
`(a) Brickner, S.J.; Manninen, P.R.; Ulanowicz, D.A.; Lovasz, K.D.; Rohrer, D.C. 206th ACS National
`Meeting, Chicago, IL. August 22-27, 1993. Abst. Pap. Am. Chem. Sac. 206 (1-2); (b) Brickner, S.J.;
`Manninen, P.R.; Ulanowicz, D.A.; Zurenko, G.E.; Schaadt, R.D.; Yagi, B.H.; Lovasz, K.D. 33rd
`Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1993, paper 72.
`6. Carlson, R.K.; Park, C.-H.; CJregory, W.A. US Patent 4,948,801 Aug. 14, 1990.
`7. Yanagi, T.; Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Comm. 1981,11, 513.
`8. Unpublished results of Palmer, J.R.; Piper, R.C. and Platte, T.F. Pharmacia & Upjohn.
`9. Gleave, D.M.; Brickner, S.J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6470,
`10. More recently, conditions have been found whereby the parent 10a can be selectively nitrated. This
`potentially provides an alternative, more direct, route to the morpholino and other amino analogs.
`11. The lowest energy conformation was obtained by employing the MM2 potential. A conformational space
`search was then performed to locate a large population of low energy conformations. These were grouped
`and analyzed to evaluate conformational populations and geometric parameters. An average torsional angle
`was calculated for the largest population of low energy conformations.
`12. Corresponding values for (±)-llb and (±)-12b are +15° and -19° respectively.
`
`5.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket