throbber
Quality in Health Care 1994;3:79-85
`
`79
`
`Evaluation of patients' knowledge about
`anticoagulant treatment
`
`Fiona C Taylor, Mary E Ramsay, Grace Tan, John Gabbay, Hannah Cohen
`
`Abstract
`Objective-To develop a questionnaire
`knowledge
`patients'
`of
`evaluate
`to
`anticoagulation.
`Design-Anonymous
`completed
`self
`questionnaire study based on hospital
`anticoagulant guidelines.
`Setting-Anticoagulant clinic in a 580 bed
`district general hospital in London.
`Subjects-70 consecutive patients newly
`referred to the anticoagulant clinic over
`six months.
`Main measures-Information received by
`patients on six items of anticoagulation
`counselling (mode of action of warfarin,
`adverse effects of over or under anti-
`coagulation, drugs to avoid, action if
`bleeding or bruising occurs, and alcohol
`consumption), the source of such infor-
`mation, and patients' knowledge about
`anticoagulation.
`Results-Of the recruits, 36(51%) were
`male; 38(54%) were aged below 46 years,
`22(31%) 46-60, and 10(14%) over 75. 50
`(71%) questionnaires were returned. In
`all, 40 respondents spoke English at home
`and six another language. Most patients
`reported being clearly advised on five of
`items, but knowledge about
`six
`the
`anticoagulation was poor. Few patients
`identify adverse con-
`could correctly
`ditions associated with poor control of
`anticoagulation: bleeding was identified
`by only 30(60%), bruising by 23(56%), and
`thrombosis by 18(36%). Only 26(52%)
`patients could identify an excessive level
`of alcohol consumption, and only seven
`(14%) could identify three or more self
`prescribed agents which may interfere
`with warfarin.
`Conclusion-The questionnaire provided
`a simple method of determining patients'
`knowledge of anticoagulation, and its
`requires
`indicated
`this
`that
`results
`improvement.
`Implications-Patients'
`responses sug-
`gested that advice was not always given
`by medical staff, and use of counselling
`checklists is recommended. Reinforce-
`ment of advice by non-medical coun-
`sellors and with educational guides such
`as posters or leaflets should be con-
`sidered. Such initiatives are currently
`being evaluated in a repeat survey.
`(Quality in Health Care 1994;3:79-85)
`Introduction
`Oral anticoagulants, such as warfarin, are
`preventing and treating
`widely used for
`vascular and thromboembolic disease. The
`
`and com-
`narrow, I
`therapeutic
`is
`range
`plications, such as life-threatening bleeding
`and re-thrombosis, can occur if patients are
`over anticoagulated or underanticoagulated.
`The efficacy of warfarin can be adversely
`including
`the
`affected by many factors,
`patients' concurrent drug treatment, change in
`diet or alcohol intake, and physical illness.2 3 It
`is therefore essential that patients are well
`advised and fully recognise the risks of anti-
`coagulant treatment. Previous reports indicate
`anticoagulants
`receiving
`oral
`that patients
`commonly do not know the potential com-
`plications and risks of their treatment.4 The
`objectives of this study were to develop a
`questionnaire to determine patients' reports of
`information received and to evaluate patients'
`knowledge of anticoagulation treatment.
`Methods
`The study site was a 580 bed district general
`hospital with an anticoagulant clinic attended
`by over 60 patients a week. The hospital's
`guidelines on managing anticoagulation were
`drawn up by the consultant haematologist,
`based on those issued by the British Society
`for Haematology6 and after discussion at the
`audit meetings.7 They
`hospital physicians'
`recommend that patients undergoing anti-
`given
`should
`be
`coagulant
`a
`treatment
`standard information card8 on anticoagulation
`and should be counselled by the ward doctor
`on six items before discharge. These items
`include the mode of action of warfarin, adverse
`effects associated with over or under anti-
`coagulation, what drugs to avoid, what action
`to take if bleeding or bruising occurs, and
`alcohol consumption. In addition, the calendar
`method as outlined in the current Department
`of Health anticoagulant treatment booklet9
`should be explained. This simple method was
`developed to improve compliance and entails
`patients ticking off on a calendar the days on
`which warfarin is taken. Although not outlined
`in the guidelines, doctors in the anticoagulant
`clinic should reinforce the information on
`these six items at the patient's first clinic
`attendance and should also distribute the anti-
`coagulant treatment booklet.
`We designed a questionnaire based on the
`six items of advice outlined in the guidelines
`first
`to complete after
`their
`patients
`for
`appointment with the anticoagulant clinic's
`doctor. The questionnaire asked patients for
`personal and clinical details, what information
`they had been given on each of the six items,
`and the source of this information. Patients'
`knowledge of the information contained in the
`Department of Health booklet was tested with
`a "quiz" section with multiple choice questions
`
`Health Care
`Development Unit,
`Academic Department
`of Public Health,
`St Mary's Hospital
`Medical School,
`London W2 1PG
`Mary E Ramsay, lecturer
`in public health medicine
`John Gabbay, senior
`lecturer in public health
`medicine
`Research Unit,
`Royal College of
`Physicians,
`London NW1 4LE
`Fiona C Taylor, research
`assistant
`Grace Tan, clinical
`research fellow
`Departments of
`Haematology,
`St Mary's Hospital
`Medical School,
`London W2 1PG and
`Central Middlesex
`Hospital,
`London NW1O 7NS
`Hannah Cohen, senior
`lecturer
`Correspondence to:
`Ms F C Taylor,
`Health Care Development
`Unit, Academic Department
`of Public Health, Central
`Middlesex Hospital, Acton
`Lane, London NW10 7NS
`Accepted for publication
`23 June 1994
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1037
`
`

`
`80
`
`in which patients were asked to tick the true,
`false, or don't know options. The question-
`naire was piloted in the clinic, and the final
`questionnaire (appendix 1) was found to be
`suitable, according to the Fog density index,
`for use by respondents who had received six
`years of schooling.'0
`Seventy consecutive patients newly referred
`to the anticoagulant clinic were recruited to the
`study over six months. All were given an anony-
`mous questionnaire by the doctor in the clinic
`at the first consultation. The doctor explained
`the purpose of the study to the patient, who
`was asked to complete the questionnaire at
`home and return it by post. Reminders were
`sent out by post two weeks later.
`Results
`STUDY POPULATION
`Of the
`patients
`study,
`recruited
`the
`to
`36(51%) were male; 38(54%) were aged less
`than 46 years, 22(31%) were aged 46-60, and
`10(14%) were aged over 75. Fifty (710%) of
`the
`70
`questionnaires
`administered were
`returned. Of the 50 respondents, 40(80%)
`spoke English at home, six (12%) spoke
`another language, and four (8%) did not
`specify. Nineteen respondents (38%) were
`retired, 1 1(22%) were in full time employ-
`11 (22%) either were claiming state
`ment,
`benefit or were unemployed, and nine (18%)
`gave no information. Thirty eight (76%) had
`been recent inpatients at the study hospital
`and six (12%) at another hospital, five (10%)
`were referred from the outpatient department
`and one (2%) from their general practitioner.
`CLINICAL DETAILS
`Of the 50 respondents, 29(58%) reported
`having venous thromboembolic disease, six
`(12%) heart disease or surgery, five (10%)
`stroke, eight (16%) multiple or other diag-
`(4%)
`and two
`did
`specify.
`not
`noses,
`Seventeen (34%) patients had been receiving
`anticoagulant treatment for fewer than two
`weeks, 16(32%) for two to three weeks,
`and the remaining 17(34%) for more than
`four weeks.
`In all, 34(68%) of patients
`expressed
`about
`receiving
`anti-
`concern
`coagulant treatment. Nineteen (38%) would
`have liked more medical advice, but only
`five (26%) felt unable to obtain sufficient
`medical advice.
`Thirty two (64%) patients reported taking
`other medicines and of these, eight (16%)
`were currently taking drugs that can adversely
`affect anticoagulation treatment. These drugs
`had been self prescribed in one patient,
`prescribed by other hospital doctors in six
`patients, and by the general practitioner in the
`remaining patient.
`
`PATIENTS REPORTS OF INFORMATION
`RECEIVED
`Apart from the
`calendar method,
`most
`patients reported receiving clear information
`on each of the six items (table 1). Among the
`38 inpatients in the study hospital, however,
`only 19(50%) reported having been given an
`information
`card
`and
`10(26%)
`reported
`
`Taylor, Ramsay, Tan, Gabbay, Cohen
`
`Patients reporting clear advice given on six
`Table I
`items from any source (n = 50)
`Items
`Calendar method
`How warfarin works
`Action if bleeding or bruising occurs
`Problems with anticoagulant treatment
`Drugs to avoid
`Alcohol
`
`No (°0) ofpatients
`22 (44)
`38 (76)
`25 (50)
`31 (62)
`37 (74)
`41 (82)
`
`receiving clear advice on three items or more
`from the ward doctor. This compares with
`19/50(38%)
`respondents
`reported
`who
`receiving such advice from the doctor in the
`anticoagulant clinic. Of the 50 respondents,
`only 10(20%) reported other sources of infor-
`mation, which included ward nurses, other
`hospital medical staff, general practitioners,
`and written literature.
`PATIENTS' KNOWLEDGE OF ANTICOAGULATION
`Although
`46(92%)
`correctly
`patients
`of
`answered that warfarin "thinned" the blood,
`knowledge of the possible side effects of poor
`control of anticoagulant treatment was low
`(table 2). Only 27(54%) patients were able to
`identify correctly three or more of the six
`genuine effects from a list of 13 conditions,
`and 18(36%) chose one or more of the seven
`unrelated conditions. In the quiz 33(66%)
`patients correctly reported that a new treat-
`ment could affect anticoagulant treatment, but
`only 26(52%) knew that changing the dose of
`concurrent tratment could also affect anti-
`coagulation.
`knowledge
`Patients'
`self
`of
`prescribed treatment which can affect anti-
`coagulant control was mixed (table 3); from a
`list of 11 self prescribed agents, only seven
`(14%) patients were able to identify three or
`more of the six agents which could adversely
`affect anticoagulation and, 11(22%) patients
`named as harmful one or more of the five
`"safe" agents listed.
`Forty one patients reported having been
`clearly advised on alcohol (82%), but, only
`26(52%) patients could correctly identify an
`excessive level of alcohol consumption, and
`19(38%) patients thought that alcohol would
`not affect anticoagulant treatment.
`Discussion
`This study used patients' reports to evaluate
`the completeness of counselling about anti-
`coagulation given at the study hospital and the
`
`Table 2
`Patients identifying conditions associated with
`poor control of anticoagulant treatment (n = 50)
`Condition
`No (%o) ofpatients
`
`Associated effects
`
`Non-associated effects
`
`Blood in stools
`Nose bleeds
`Prolonged bleeding
`Bruising
`Blood in urine
`Blood clots
`Sleeplessness
`Weakness
`Loss of appetite
`Ringing in the ears
`Nausea
`Nervousness
`High blood pressure
`
`20 (40)
`26 (52)
`30 (60)
`23 (56)
`18 (36)
`18 (36)
`5 (10)
`9 (18)
`7 (14)
`4 (8)
`7 (14)
`7 (14)
`9 (18)
`
`

`
`Evaluation ofpatients' knowledge about anticoagulant treatment
`
`81
`
`Patients identifying selfprescribed agents which
`Table 3
`should be avoided when taking anticoagulants (n = 50)
`No (Oo) ofpatients
`Selfprescribed agent
`40 (80)
`9 (18)
`11 (22)
`4 (8)
`2 (4)
`7 (14)
`
`Aspirin
`Cough medicines
`Nurofen
`Codliver oil
`Garlic capsules
`Health shop remedies
`
`To be avoided
`
`Ma, be used
`
`0 (0)
`Vitamin C
`2 (4)
`Throat lozenges
`1 (2)
`Optrex
`0 (0)
`TCP (Trichlorophenol)
`8 (16)
`Antacids*
`*The safety of antacids in warfarin treatment is controversial.
`
`outcome of such counselling in terms of
`patients' knowledge. Recent inpatients at the
`hospital reported receiving little information
`of anti-
`risks and complications
`on the
`coagulant treatment from the ward doctors.
`According to patients' reports, the doctors in
`the anticoagulant clinic were better at giving
`advice, but as the questionnaire was admin-
`istered at the first clinic appointment, patients
`would be expected to have better recall of
`information given at this time.
`This study also highlights a substantial gap
`between the information patients reported
`having received and the outcome in terms of
`their knowledge of anticoagulant treatment.
`For example, even though most patients
`reported having been advised on the problems
`associated with oral anticoagulants, only a
`correctly
`proportion
`small
`able
`to
`were
`identify most of the adverse events and some
`patients were confused about other
`side
`effects. This lack of knowledge was apparent
`all patients knowing that
`despite virtually
`warfarin "thins" the blood.
`Patients' knowledge about anticoagulation
`was disappointing and there are two possible
`explanations for these findings. The first is
`that ward doctors at the study hospital are not
`giving all the information recommended in
`the guidelines. Previous audits of inpatient
`referral
`management and of the
`process
`showed poor compliance of ward doctors
`with other aspects of the guidelines on anti-
`coagulant treatment,1 1 12 and compliance with
`the recommended counselling may also be
`poor. In this study 14% of patients had been
`treatment which can interfere
`prescribed
`with warfarin, which accords with the results
`study which showed poor
`of a previous
`knowledge among doctors of which drugs
`can interact with oral anticoagulants. A lack
`staff may
`of knowledge among medical
`contribute to a reluctance to advise patients
`about the risks and complications of anti-
`coagulation. More widespread dissemination
`of guidelines to medical staff is required, with
`specific instructions on counselling patients
`receiving anticoagulation.
`The second explanation, supported by the
`gap between patients'
`of advice
`reports
`received and their knowledge, is that patients
`are unable to understand and retain the
`advice they are given, as shown in previous
`studies.'3 14 The poor quality of doctor patient
`
`communication has been well described in
`other chronic conditions,15-17 and training in
`communication skills for doctors has received
`until
`little
`medical
`schools
`emphasis
`in
`recently.'
`communication
`More effective
`arises from understanding patients' expec-
`tations, involving patients in negotiating their
`treatment plan,'5 and continuity and accessi-
`of staff.'5
`levels
`of patient
`Better
`bility
`knowledge may also be achieved if information
`is reinforced by simple measures such as
`repetition or using written material.'9 The
`availability of a non-medical counsellor, such
`as a clinical pharmacist or nurse practitioner,
`has also been shown to increase patients'
`treatments.20 2
`medical
`about
`knowledge
`Non-medical staff may be better able to offer
`continuing support, to talk with the patient,
`and to ensure that written information has
`been read and understood.
`two
`importance
`of
`the
`The relative
`explanations for the poor level of patients'
`knowledge was not addressed in this study.
`That would require independent observation
`of the consultation or inclusion of the doctors'
`perspective and would be difficult to replicate
`in routine practice. Our questionnaire focused
`on the patients' perspective and could be
`repeated at the study hospital to evaluate
`changes in practice or adopted for use at other
`sites.
`This study's aim was not to relate patients'
`levels of knowledge to clinical outcome. A pre-
`vious small study was unable to demonstrate a
`relation between a structured programme of
`education and rate of complications or thera-
`peutic control.23 Therefore, patient education
`forms only one part of effective anticoagulant
`control; we are currently developing methods
`to audit other aspects of management.
`Recommendations
`To improve patients' knowledge it is import-
`ant to focus on the process of giving infor-
`mation. To increase the number of patients
`being counselled about anticoagulant treat-
`ment by ward doctors, the guidelines have
`been disseminated through the computer
`system and through the development of con-
`densed guidelines in the form of practice
`points.24 For doctors in the anticoagulant
`clinic a checklist for counselling has been
`incorporated into the clinic history sheets for
`all new patients. Doctors often omit important
`items of advice,25 and the checklist can act as
`an "aide memoire" (appendix 2).
`To reinforce counselling and to provide on-
`going education a trained health care assistant
`asks each patient attending the anticoagulant
`five key questions. These questions
`clinic
`highlight the most important potential com-
`plications; changes in medication, hospital
`admission, episodes of bleeding or bruising,
`attendances at the accident and emergency
`or forthcoming surgery. The
`department,
`assistant also distributes and explains written
`information in the form of a leaflet which
`focuses on these key points.
`The use of written educational guides may
`also successfully alert patients to the possible
`
`

`
`82
`
`Taylor, Ramsay, Tan, Gabbay, Cohen
`
`about anticoagulant treatment. A repeat survey
`of patients at the anticoagulant clinic is being
`performed to evaluate the effects of changes in
`practice at the hospital. The questionnaire
`proved easy to administer and has been
`shortened to concentrate on the important
`aspects of education, which are reinforced at
`each visit. The method has also been adapted
`and is currently being used at other clinic sites
`in North West Thames region.
`We thank the Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians
`(London), headed by Dr Anthony Hopkins, for funding this
`work; Mrs Millie Simpson, anticoagulant clinic coordinator for
`helping in data collection; and Dr Adrian Renton for advice on
`the manuscript.
`
`risks and complications of treatment. Such
`guides, including posters and leaflets, have
`been instructive
`other conditions and
`in
`promote positive changes in patients' well-
`being and improve compliance.18 26 Clear
`explanation of the rationale for and potential
`problems with anticoagulant treatment may
`help to improve patients' compliance with
`advice given. For the anticoagulant clinic at
`the study hospital, a poster and a patient
`leaflet based on the information contained in
`the Department of Health anticoagulant treat-
`ment booklet9 have been devised.
`The
`questionnaire
`in
`successful
`was
`evaluating the level of patients' knowledge
`Appendix 1
`Patient questionnaire
`Section A: This section tells us about your general health and the anticoagulant
`treatment (for example, warfarin or phenindione) that you are now receiving
`Since starting anticoagulant treatment, would you say that your general health has:
`1
`(Please tick)
`Improved D
`Worsened D
`Stayed the same D
`2 How long ago was your present anticoagulant treatment started?
`Less than 1 week
`D
`Between 1-2 weeks
`Lii
`Between 2-4 weeks
`L
`More than 4 weeks
`D
`El
`Can't remember
`If more than 4 weeks, please state how long
`3 As far as you know, which of the following are reasons for your present anticoagulant treatment?
`(Please tick Yes, No, or Not sure for each item)
`Not
`sureDo
`-Ii
`Lii
`
`Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) - blood clot in leg vein
`a
`b
`Pulmonary embolus (PE) - blood clot in lung
`Heart disease
`c
`d
`Heart surgery
`Stroke
`e
`Anything else?
`4 About your present anticoagulant treatment:
`a Have you wanted to approach anyone for medical advice?
`Yes E
`No D
`b Have you been able to?
`El
`Yes
`No L
`If YES, who?
`c
`5 Do you worry about being on anticoagulant treatment?
`A lot E
`A little E
`Not at all
`Lii
`If so, what are your concems?
`Please list ALL medications, tablets, and remedies you are taking now. Please include those obtained with
`and without a prescription (egfrom your GP, hospital, health shops and chemists). Please also state
`whether taken regularly OR only when you think you need to
`Name of preparation
`(Please tick one or other)
`Taken regularly Taken when needed
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`-IIFo:
`
`6
`
`For how many
`weeks/months/years
`have you been taking it?
`
`Started by whom?
`(eg GP, hospital,
`anticoagulant clinic,
`self, pharmacist)
`
`

`
`Evaluation ofpatients' knowledge about anticoagulant treatment
`
`83
`
`Section B: The questions in this section are about the time you spent in the ward
`as a patient at Central Middlesex Hospital
`Were you recently an inpatient in a ward at Central Middlesex Hospital?
`1
`Yes R
`No C
`Please answer question 2 only ifyou started anticoagulant treatment while in the ward at Central Middlesex
`Hospital
`a When you left the ward were you handed a white card "Advice for patients on anticoagulant
`2
`treatment"?
`Yes R
`No R
`Not sure D
`b Was the information on the card:
`Too complicated? D
`D
`Too simple?
`D
`Just right?
`Please state any problems you had with the white card:
`
`c
`
`LI
`
`Don't know LI
`
`Section C: The questions in this section are about the information you may have
`been given about your anticoagulant treatment
`a Were you told how anticoagulant treatment works, and was this clear to you?
`1
`No D
`Yes, but not clear D
`Yes, and clear E
`b Who told you?
`LI
`Doctor in the ward
`Doctor in the anticoagulant clinic
`Who else (for example, GP, nurse, other clinic staff) Please state:
`a Were you told of the problems with anticoagulant treatment, and was this clear to you?
`LI
`No L
`LI
`Yes, and clear
`Yes, but not clear
`b Who told you?
`Don't know LI
`EI
`Doctor in the ward L
`Doctor in the anticoagulant clinic
`Who else (for example, GP, nurse, other clinic staff) Please state:
`a Were you told what to do if you have a nosebleed or are bruising, and was this clear to you?
`No LI
`LI
`LI
`Yes, but not clear
`Yes, and clear
`b Who told you?
`Don't know LI
`Doctor in the ward L
`Doctor in the anticoagulant clinic L
`Who else (for example, GP, nurse, other clinic staff) Please state:
`a Were you told of the calendar method to check your anticoagulant treatment, and was this clear
`to you?
`El
`No L
`Yes, and clear L
`Yes, but not clear
`b Who told you?
`Doctor in the ward L
`Doctor in the anticoagulant clinic L
`Who else (for example, GP, nurse, other clinic staff) Please state:
`a Were you told what drugs to avoid, and was this clear to you?
`No LI
`LI
`LI
`Yes, but not clear
`Yes, and clear
`b Who told you?
`aI
`Doctor in the ward LI
`Doctor in the anticoagulant clinic
`Who else (for example, GP, nurse, other clinic staff) Please state:
`a Were you given advice on drinking alcohol, and was this clear to you?
`EI
`No LI
`LI
`Yes, but not clear
`Yes, and clear
`b Who told you?
`LI
`Doctor in the ward
`Doctor in the anticoagulant clinic
`Who else (for example, GP, nurse, other clinic staff) Please state:
`Section D: This section is a miniquiz because we would like to find out how well patients
`have been informed about anticoagulant treatment and the problems it may cause
`1 How does warfarin work?
`(Please tick Yes or No for each statement)
`No
`Yes
`E]
`LI
`Warfarin does not affect the blood
`a
`LI
`LI
`b Warfarin thins the blood
`LI
`LI
`Warfarin thickens the blood
`c
`Could starting a new treatment or any other preparation affect your anticoagulant treatment?
`Don't know LI
`No LI
`LI
`Yes
`Could changing the dose of a treatment you are already taking affect your anticoagulant treatment?
`3
`No LI
`Don't know LI
`Yes
`LI
`4 The following are statements about any patient drinking alcohol when receiving anticoagulant
`treatment
`(Please tick Yes or No for each statement)
`No
`Yes
`L
`Alcohol does not affect anticoagulant treatment
`L
`Alcohol must be avoided totally
`LI
`L
`El
`8 units of alcohol a night is OK (for example, 4 pints of beer or 8 glasses of wine)
`L
`1 unit of alcohol a night is OK (for example, 2 pint of beer or 1 glass of wine)
`L
`L
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`2
`
`Don't know L
`
`Don't know LI
`
`LI
`
`Don't know LI
`
`

`
`84
`
`Taylor, Ramnsay, Tant, GabbaY, Cohen
`
`5 Of the list below, which drugs should be avoided when receiving anticoagulant treatment? Please
`do not be alarmed, some of the drugs listed below should not be avoided
`(Please tick True, False, or Don't know for each item)
`Don't know True False
`Aspirin
`Li
`Li
`L
`Cough medicines
`Li
`Li
`L
`Nurofen
`Li
`Li
`L
`Antacids (for example, Rennie, Settlers)
`Li
`L
`Li
`Optrex (eye solution)
`Li
`Li
`Li
`Li
`Codliver oil
`Li
`Li
`Garlic capsules
`Li
`Li
`Li
`TCP/Dettol
`Li
`Li
`Li
`Vitamin C tablets
`Li
`Li
`Li
`Throat lozenges
`Li
`Li
`Li
`Health shop remedies
`Li
`Li
`E
`6 Which of the following could be possible side effects of taking the wrong (too little or too much)
`amount of anticoagulant treatment? Please do not be alarmed, some of the items are wrong
`(Please tick True, False, or Don 't know for each item,)
`Don't know True False
`Blood in stools
`LL
`Li
`Nose bleeds
`L
`Li
`L
`Sleeplessness
`L
`Li
`L
`Prolonged bleeding after cuts
`LL
`Li
`Bruising without injury
`Ei
`Li
`E]
`Weakness
`Li
`Li
`Li
`EL
`Loss of appetite
`Ci
`L
`Ringing in the ears
`F
`G]
`Nausea
`Blood in urine
`Nervousness
`Blood clots
`High blood pressure
`
`L-iL-iL-iL-iLi
`
`Li
`
`L
`Li
`
`Li
`
`Li
`
`Patient details
`CONFIDENTIAL
`So that we can be sure that this questionnaire reaches a cross section of patients we would appreciate
`the following information
`Are you replying on behalf of:
`a
`Somebody else
`Yourself
`Li
`If somebody else, please explain:
`b
`i)
`Your relationship to the patient:
`ii) The reason your help is needed:
`Ifyou are completinlg this form on7 behalf of the patient please anszwer the following qitestion
`b
`Are you (the patient):
`Male
`Female
`Li
`Li
`c Which of the following age groups are you (the patient) in:
`Under 16
`Li
`16-30
`Li
`31-45
`Li
`46-60
`Li
`61-70
`2i
`71 and over
`Li
`d What language do you (the patient) speak at home?
`English
`Other (please specify)
`Li
`Which of the following best describes your (the patient's) employment status?
`e
`Employed full time
`Employed part time
`Li
`Li
`Unemployed
`Long term sick leave or benefit
`Li
`Li
`Student
`Retired
`Li
`Li
`Thank you very much for taking the time to complete this questionnaire
`
`as they applyi to hiin /her
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`McInnes GT, Helenglass G. The performance of clinics for
`outpatient control of anticoagulation. .7 R Coll Phs'sicians
`Lond 1987;21:42-5.
`Standing Advisory Committee for Haematology of the
`Royal College of Pathologists. Drug interaction with
`coumarin derivative anticoagulants. BMJ 1982;285:274.
`Duxbury BMcD. Therapeutic control of anticoagulant
`treatment. BMJ 1982;294:702-4.
`Colwell N, O'Neill T, Tyrell J. Robinson K, Clarke R,
`Graham I. An evaluation of an anticoagulant clinic. Irish
`Med]_ 1990;83:94-7.
`Burns E, Wyld P, Bax N.
`Doctors'
`and patients'
`perspectives of adverse drug reactions in
`a general
`medical and an anticoagulant clinic. . R Coll Phvsicinam
`Lond 1988;22:248-51.
`British Society for Haematology, British Committee for
`Standards in Haematology: Haematosis and Thrombosis
`Task Force. Guidelines on oral anticoagulation: second
`edition. Y C/li Pathol 1990;43:177-83.
`
`7
`
`Gabbay J, McNicol M, Spiby J, Davics S, I ayton A. What
`did medical audit achieve? Lessons from the preliminary
`evaluation of a sear's medical audit. BMA7 1990;301:
`526-9.
`Advice ofi
`patients on antltioagniant
`8
`tretianent. London:
`Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1988.
`Department of Health. Antocoagniant trcatinscnt. London:
`9
`HMSO, 1985. (Dd 8933025.)
`10 Gilliland J. Readability; UKRA tcachi'n,
`'cadinl, 11mono)-
`o/
`graph. London: University of London Press, 1972.
`11 Tan G, Cohen H, Taylor F, Gabbas J. The audit of
`anticoagulation therapy: initiation of anticoagulation in
`inpatients. .7 Cliii Pathol 1993;46:67-71.
`12 Tan GBT, Cohen H, Taylor FC, Gabbay J. Referral of
`patients to an anticoagulant clinic: implications for better
`management. Quality in Health Care 1993;2:96 9.
`13 Ley P, Bradshaw PW, Eaves D, Walker CM. A method for
`increasing patients' recall of information presented bh
`doctors. Psvchol Med 1973;3:217 20.
`
`

`
`Evaluation ofpatients' knowledge about anticoagulant treatment
`
`85
`
`Appendix 2
`Checklist for patient counselling
`Please tick to confirm that the use of the yellow Department of Health
`anticoagulant treatment book has been explained to the patient
`E
`Please tick the boxes to confirm that you have counselled the patient on
`the following items:
`D
`Compliance (the calendar method)
`1
`Rationale for treatment
`E
`2
`3 Mode of action of warfarin
`D
`Obtaining supply of warfarin from general practitioner
`I
`4
`Possible effects of poor control of anticoagulation
`5
`Bleeding or severe bruising
`L
`Recurrence of thromboembolism
`L
`Appropriate action if bleeding or bruising occurs
`Appropriate action if patient has diarrhoea or is vomiting
`Starting new treatment and changing dose of current treatment
`Self prescribed drugs:
`LI
`Avoid aspirin
`Avoid Nurofen
`C]
`LI
`Avoid health shop remedies
`L
`Ask pharmacist, doctor for advice
`Alcohol intake
`10
`Contraception, pregnancy, and hormone replacement therapy
`11
`(if relevant)
`Surgical procedures (including dental work)
`12
`Injections
`13
`Leisure activities
`14
`Counselled by:
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`Date:
`
`Pollock A.
`14 Roddie A,
`of anti-
`control
`Therapeutic
`coagulation: how important is patient education? CGin
`Lab Haematol 1988;10:109-12.
`15 Wikblad K. Patient's perspectives of diabetes care and
`education. Jf Adv Nursing 1991 ;16:837-44.
`16 Mechanic D. Health and illness behaviour and patient-
`practitioner
`relationships.
`Soc
`Sci Med 1992;12:
`1345-50.
`17 Greenfield S. Sherrie H, Kaplan H, Ware J, Martin E,
`Harrison J. Patients' participation in medical care. _7 Gen
`Intern Med 1988;3:448-57.
`18 McManus I, Vincent C, Thom S, Kidd J. Teaching
`communication skills to clinical students. BMJ 1993;
`306:1322-7.
`19 Kitchen J. Patient information leaflets - the state of the art.
`J R Soc Med 1990;83:298-300.
`20 Dodds L. Industry produced patient information leaflets:
`are hospital pharmacies making use of them? Pharm .7
`1993;243:311-2.
`21 Vogt BH, Kapp C. Patient education in primary care
`practice. Patient Education 1987;81:273-7.
`22 Kornblit P, Senderoff J, Davis-Erikson M, Zenk J. Nurse
`Practitioner 1990;15:21-33.
`23 Wyness MA. Evaluation of an educational programme for
`_7 Adv Nursing
`patients
`taking
`1990;15:
`warfarin.
`1052-63.
`24 Taylor F, Ramsay M, Renton A, Cohen H. Referral of
`patients to an anticoagulant clinic. Quality in Health Care
`1994;3: 120.
`25 Wells F. Patient information - the present and the future.
`.7 R Soc Med 1990;83:300-2.
`26 Siminioff L. Improving communications with cancer
`patients. Oncology (Huntingt) 1992;10:83-9.
`
`LI
`L
`L
`
`LI
`LI
`LI
`LI
`El

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket