throbber
ClinicalChemisty
`(1996)
`1537-1541
`
`42:9
`
`Thrombus precursor protein (TpP): marker of
`thrombosis early in the pathogenesis of myocardial
`infarction
`
`DAVID
`
`G.M.
`
`CARVILLE,l*
`NIKor
`ELAINE M. BRILL,1
`
`DIMITRIJEVIC,’
`NATASHA
`DREW,1
`
`MARK WALSH,2
`TAMARA
`and PAUL E. GARGAN1
`
`DIGIROLAMO,2
`
`mi-
`an enzyme-linked
`We have developed
`immunosorbent
`for quantifying
`munoassay
`pro-
`the
`immediate
`precursor
`teins
`to intravascular
`thrombi.
`This
`thrombus
`precursor
`(fpP)
`assay identifies
`active
`thrombosis
`in several
`protein
`clinical
`conditions,
`including
`early myocardial
`infarction
`for the GUSTO
`In
`(Ml).
`a study
`of patients
`recruited
`had concentrations
`of TpP
`intervention
`study, MI patients
`4-20-fold
`that of controls;
`patients
`diagnosed
`without
`MI
`had concentrations
`to
`the
`control
`subjects.
`In a
`similar
`the
`emergency
`separate
`study
`subjects
`presenting
`at
`of
`room with chest
`pain, MI patients who presented
`early after
`the onset
`of chest pain had TpP concentrations
`significantly
`(P <0.01)
`higher
`than controls.
`Patients
`presenting
`late or
`with other chest pain had concentrations
`diagnosed
`within
`of the TpP assay
`the
`reference
`range. The
`potential
`utility
`as an aid for
`diagnosis
`of
`thrombotic
`MI
`and other
`the
`thrombotic
`conditions
`is described.
`
`INDEXING
`enzyme
`
`thrombosis
`coronary
`mai1s:
`immunoassay.
`reference
`values
`
`#{149}fibrin
`
`polymers
`
`#{149}
`
`plays a key role in the pathogenesis
`Thrombosis
`states,
`including myocardial
`infarction
`(MI),
`angina
`(UA),
`deep
`vein
`thrombosis
`(DVT),
`embolism [1,2]. Thrombosis
`occurs
`in both
`
`of many disease
`stroke,
`unstable
`and pulmonary
`the venous
`and
`
`Biogenetic
`‘American
`Dame, Notre Dame,
`IN.
`2 The Department of Emergency Medicine
`
`Sciences & Lobund
`
`Laboratory,
`
`University
`
`of Notre
`
`and Care
`
`and the Office
`
`of
`
`Medical Education, St.Joseph’sMedical Center, South Bend, IN.
`*Address correspondence to this author, at: American Biogenetic Sciences
`
`IN 46635. Fax 219-271-3422; e-mail
`
`Dr., South Bend,
`Ironwood
`1539, N.
`PauI.E.Gargan.
`l@nd.edu.
`protein; MI, myocar-
`precursor
`thronibus
`TpP,
`Nonstandard
`abbreviations:
`dialinfarction;GUSTO, Global Utilization
`of Screpcokinase and Tissue plasmin-
`ogen activatorforOccluded coronary arteries; ER, emergency room; UA, unstable
`deep vein thrombosis;CK, creatinekinase;CKMB, creatine
`angina; DVT,
`kinase
`and EGG, eleccrocardiogram.
`MB isoenzyme;
`Received May 2, 1996; accepted June 27, 1996.
`
`1537
`
`predisposing
`by various
`and can be precipitated
`systems
`arterial
`disease
`(atherosclerosis),
`conditions,
`including
`vascular
`clinical
`vascular
`devices,
`anes-
`trauma, malignancy,
`prosthetic
`surgery,
`systemic
`lupus
`erythem-
`pregnancy,
`oral
`contraceptives,
`thesia,
`in
`and
`bacterial
`infection
`[2]. Congenital
`deficiency
`atosus,
`certain
`anticoagulant
`proteins
`(e.g.,
`protein
`C, protein
`5, and
`antithrombin
`III) can also predispose individuals
`to thrombosis
`[3-5]. Coronary
`thrombosis
`is the
`leading
`cause of
`artery
`cases of M.I each year
`mortality
`in the US, with
`1.5 million
`in >700 000 deaths [6]. In addition,
`cases
`>1 million
`resulting
`of UA present
`to the emergency
`room (ER) each year in the US,
`of which
`10-15% progress
`to MI
`[7].
`in thrombosis
`biochemical
`process
`the
`is
`A fundamental
`conversion
`of circulating
`soluble
`insoluble
`fibrinogen
`to the
`fibrin matrix
`that serves as a structural
`“glue”
`that consolidates
`and gives mechanical
`components
`of
`rigidity
`to the cellular
`the
`principal
`components
`of blood clots
`blood
`clot
`[8]. The
`cellular
`are activated platelets
`and erythrocytes.
`Venous
`clots tradition-
`ally form in areas of stasis and are composed mainly
`of eryth-
`and fibrin.
`circulation,
`In the arterial
`clots form under
`rocytes
`conditions
`of high
`flow and shear and are composed mainly
`of
`platelets
`together
`by fibrin
`strands [8].
`held
`In almost all cases, acute MI occurs by occlusive thrombosis
`of atherosclerotic
`arteries
`after
`rupture
`lesions
`in the
`coronary
`[9, 10]. This
`coronary
`thrombosis
`in stenosed vessels
`leads
`to
`total or partial
`occlusion
`in ischemia,
`of
`the
`vessel,
`resulting
`and eventually
`of the myocardial
`tissue [10]. The
`injury,
`necrosis
`duration
`the ischemia
`and the size of
`the area
`involved
`of
`determine
`the extent of necrosis
`the extent of
`and consequently
`[Ii].The early dissolution
`in ventricular
`loss
`function
`of
`the
`thrombotic
`occlusion
`by thrombolytic
`can dramatically
`therapy
`thereby preserving
`ventricular
`and sub-
`limit necrosis,
`function
`stantially
`reducing
`and mortality
`from acute MI
`morbidity
`[12, 13].
`of myocardial
`necrosis
`Irreversible
`occurs
`generally
`tissue
`the onset
`of chest pain and is associated
`between
`4 and 6 h after
`release of
`cardiac muscle
`cell
`proteins,
`including
`with
`the
`creatine kinase(CK) and its MB isoenzyme
`(CKMB),
`troponin,
`
`MYLAN - EXHIBIT 1035
`
`

`
`1538
`
`Carville
`
`et al.: Thrombus
`
`precursor
`
`protein
`
`and myoglobin
`these necrotic markers
`of
`[14, 15]. Detection
`for MI. Clearly,
`earlier
`tests
`forms
`the basis of current
`diagnostic
`markers of thrombotic occlusionand ischemiaof cardiacmuscle
`would greatlyfacilitatethe
`diagnosis
`of an evolving MI
`and
`permit more timely therapeutic
`intervention.Such therapy
`would
`reduce
`the extent of damage to the cardiac tissue.
`Considerable efforthas been investedby numerous
`groups
`in
`recent years in attempts to develop such diagnostictests[16].
`Even though the roleof thrombosis in MI has been under-
`has been little advance
`stood
`for
`some time,
`there
`in
`the
`development
`of direct
`diagnostic
`tests
`for
`active
`thrombosis.
`of noninvasive,
`Indeed,
`the development
`highly
`specific
`tests for
`the direct measurement
`of active
`thrombosis
`has proven
`partic-
`ularly
`difficult
`[17].
`of
`the activation
`of
`measure markers
`Several
`immunoassays
`system, which
`are not necessarily
`coinci-
`the blood
`coagulation
`of thrombosis.
`Such tests
`include
`assays
`for
`dent with the extent
`of prothrombin
`fragment
`F1.2
`and
`for
`en-
`the measurement
`complexes
`such
`as thrombin-antithrombin
`ITT
`zyme-inhibitor
`and
`plasmin-antiplasmin.
`However,
`because
`they measure
`the
`changes
`in activity
`of
`coagulation
`system,
`these
`tests
`have
`not been effective
`in aiding
`in the accurate
`diagnosis
`of MI [18].
`has been to develop
`a specific and reproducible
`Our approach
`that can measure
`of proteins
`the concentrations
`previously
`test
`shown to be present
`in the blood of patients with thrombosis
`[1].
`poly-
`These
`proteins
`are high-molecular-weight
`soluble
`fibrin
`to the insoluble
`fibrin
`found in
`mers,
`the immediate
`precursors
`a thrombus.
`The
`immunochemical
`test
`for
`these
`thrombus
`precursor
`proteins
`(TpP;
`American
`Biogenetic
`Sciences)
`uses a
`specific for polymeric
`fibrin
`[19].
`monoclonal
`antibody
`highly
`In this study we investigated
`of this
`the diagnostic
`accuracy
`samples from MI
`new direct
`test
`for active
`thrombosis
`in blood
`and non-MI
`patients who presented
`to the ER with
`symptom-
`atic chest
`pain.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`SUBJECTS
`in chest pain patients
`studies were performed
`Two
`independent
`presenting to the ER. The first study included
`47 patients who
`had
`been
`recruited
`specifically
`for
`the Global
`Utilization
`of
`and Tissue
`activator
`for Occluded
`Streptokinase
`plasminogen
`coronary arteries
`(GUSTO)
`intervention
`study. These
`patients
`all GUSTO entrance criteria,i.e., had symptomatic
`met
`chest
`pain, showed classic
`(ECG)
`electrocardiogram
`changes,
`and
`the onset of pain [20].
`presented to the ER within
`4 h after
`Patientswere diagnosed with MI, UA, or other
`chest
`pain.
`study, we included a largerpatient
`In the
`second
`cohort,
`recruiting300 ER patients.These patientswere categorizedas
`MI earlypresenters(i.e., met GUSTO criteriaand had refer-
`ence
`of cardiac
`proteins); MI
`late present-
`range
`concentrations
`to the ER >6 h after
`ers (who presented
`the onset of pain or had
`of CK); other chest pain; and other
`above normal
`concentrations
`conditions
`in which
`intravascular
`fibrin formation
`was indicated.
`was made by extensive review of
`the individual
`The
`diagnosis
`medical
`records. Both studies were approved by the institutional
`board at St. Joseph’s Medical Center. All patients’
`blood
`review
`to the ER.
`samples were drawn at presentation
`
`PROCEDURES
`Sample processing. Blood samples were
`drawn by hospital person-
`nel
`Tubes (Becton Dickinson,
`into Vacutainer
`Rutherford,
`NJ)
`containing
`buffered
`sodium citrate
`(129 mmol/L
`final
`concen-
`tration). Within
`30 mm of collection,
`the blood was centrifuged
`for
`15 mm,
`the plasma
`was aspirated,
`at
`1SOO-l800g
`and
`aliquoted,
`and stored
`frozen
`-20
`#{176}Cuntil
`analysis.
`
`at
`
`used the microtiter
`ELISA
`plate
`of TpP. We
`Measurement
`anti-TpP
`the
`described
`previously
`In
`brief,
`procedure
`[21].
`antibody was coated
`onto
`the wells of a 96-well microtiter
`plate
`(Nunc Maxisorb;
`Fisher
`Scientific,
`Glendale,
`IL). Calibrators,
`for 15 mm at 37 #{176}C),
`and controls were
`plasma
`samples
`(thawed
`incubated
`in the wells. Samples with visible
`clots
`and extensive
`hemolysis
`or
`lipemia
`were
`rejected
`from the
`analysis.
`Bound
`TpP was detected
`after
`incubation
`with a nonspecific
`detection
`antibody
`conjugated
`to horseradish
`peroxidase
`and
`then with
`3,3’ ,5,5 ‘-tetramethylbenzidine
`substrate.
`Absorbance
`of samples
`was
`read at 450 nm (Molecular
`Devices, Menlo
`Park, CA),
`and
`the concentration
`of TpP
`in patients’
`samples was determined
`by comparison
`with a calibration
`curve
`constructed
`with a set of
`TpP calibrators.
`interval
`a reference
`We
`estimated
`(men
`and women,
`healthy
`volunteers
`suspected
`intravascular
`thrombosis.
`
`TpP in 45
`by assaying
`ages 22-70
`years) without
`
`in all chest
`of cardiac proteins. CK was determined
`Determination
`and CKMB
`pain patients
`those
`isoenzymes
`were
`tested
`in
`confirmed MI. Both CK and CKMB were mea-
`patients
`with
`sured with test kits
`from Abbott
`IL). The refer-
`(Abbott
`Park,
`ence interval
`for CK is <150
`for CKMB,
`it is <6% of total
`U/L;
`CK.
`
`For
`Statistical methods.
`samples from patients
`the Statview
`software
`Concepts,
`Berkeley,
`subjected
`to ANOVA.
`
`statistical
`recruited
`application
`CA). The
`
`the
`for
`results
`the
`of
`analysis
`study, we used
`for
`the second
`for
`the Macintosh
`(Abacus
`four
`patients’
`categories
`were
`
`Results
`curve for
`calibration
`the TpP
`A typical
`1) was
`assay (Fig.
`consis-
`of TpP
`calibrator
`that
`by using
`a preparation
`generated
`tently
`demonstrates
`linearity
`to 40 mg/L.
`The
`calibrator
`TpP
`has demonstrated
`for >12 months with no significant
`stability
`loss in immunoreactivity
`stored
`at
`-20
`
`#{176}C,4 #{176}C,room
`when
`or 37 #{176}C.
`temperature,
`The concentration
`of TpP in the healthy
`controls
`and normal
`control
`plasma
`from 1 to 6 mg/L,
`ranged
`was used to validate the assay. The
`processing
`of samples was
`by testing
`TpP
`validated
`concentrations
`in
`fresh
`samples
`#{176}C.TpP demonstrated
`and again after storage at
`(n >50)
`-20
`stability when
`stored under
`the conditions
`described.
`In inde-
`the TpP concentrations
`pendent
`studies,
`in an age-
`and
`sex-
`matched population
`(including
`smokers and nonsmokers)
`<50
`years old was <4.0 mg/L
`not shown).
`(data
`groups:
`Initially,
`we studied patients
`categorized
`three
`into
`(n =
`chest pain
`18), and other
`15), UA (n =
`(n =
`14).
`
`MI
`
`

`
`ClinicalChemistiy
`
`42, No.
`
`9, 1996
`
`1539
`
`pulmo-
`(n = 24), e.g., DVT,
`thrombosis
`ated with intravascular
`failure.
`embolism,
`data
`heart
`Individual
`congestive
`nary
`and
`patients
`diagnosed
`with other
`points
`for
`the MI patients,
`those
`in Fig.
`(n = 45) are summarized
`chest pain, and healthy controls
`By the time
`study,
`reference
`calibrators were
`2 (right).
`of
`this
`of TpP concentrations.
`available for quantification
`with
`control
`subjects, MI
`presenting
`Compared
`patients
`6 h of
`the onset
`of pain had
`(P <0.01)
`within
`significantly
`increased TpP; MI patients
`diag-
`presenting
`late
`and patients
`nosed with
`pain did not.
`other
`chest
`Patients
`diagnosed
`with
`other
`conditions
`of active
`fibrin
`formation
`also demonstrated
`higher TpP concentrations
`significantly
`than the healthy
`con-
`trols (data not
`shown).
`In several cases, patients diagnosed with UA or noncardiac
`chest pain were
`later diagnosed
`with MI. Among
`these was a
`woman who presented at the ER with
`chest pain. A
`53-year-old
`nonspecific ECG led to her being
`diagnosed
`with UA and she
`(30.0 mgfL),
`patient’s TpP concentration
`was discharged.
`This
`(4.0
`however,
`was much
`higher
`than
`that
`for a control
`sample
`a highly increased extent of
`mg/L)
`and clearly indicated
`throm-
`the ER the
`bosis.
`Returning
`to
`next
`day,
`the
`patient
`was
`at the ER
`with MI.
`In another
`diagnosed
`patient who presented
`the ECG showed nonspecific ST depression of
`with chest pain,
`T wave
`<1 mm on initial
`presentation;
`20 h later,
`however,
`inversion
`was detected
`in the ECG profile,
`and both CK and
`CKMB
`were increased
`-10% of
`total CK,
`to 437 U/L
`and
`respectively.
`The TpP in this
`second
`patient was >40 mg/L (off
`scale), and the patient
`progressed
`to transmural MI.
`the 6-h window
`In 8 of
`the 33 MI patients
`presenting
`within
`of chest pain, TpP and CK were measured
`after the onset
`in
`serial
`samples
`collected
`at 12 and 24 h after
`admission.
`Fig.
`3
`shows
`the temporal
`profile
`of these
`analytes.
`In all MI patients,
`TpP was
`increased
`at presentation
`and
`returned
`to normal
`at 12 h (Fig. 3, top). The
`converse was observed
`for CK:
`values
`to the ER after
`the onset of
`i.e., MI patients
`presenting
`early
`chest pain with normal
`concentrations
`of CK had increased
`CK
`at
`the second
`time point.
`
`#{149}1,
`y =
`
`- 4.1429e-3
`
`+ 2.0463e-2x
`
`R2 = 0.998
`
`EC0U
`
`) a
`
`)
`C.)
`
`C 0C
`
`l)
`
`Fig. 1. Dose-response
`assay.
`
`Calibrator Concentration
`
`(mg/L)
`
`calibration curve for the TpP immunochemical
`
`of TpP in these three groups
`of the concentrations
`Comparison
`13) is summarized
`in healthy
`controls
`in Fig. 2
`(n =
`with those
`study, TpP was expressed in
`early
`chest-pain
`this
`(left).
`In
`ELISA units
`a well-defined
`of the calibra-
`because
`formulation
`tor had not yet been developed.
`In patients
`diagnosed
`with MI,
`the TpP concentrations
`were 4-
`to 20-fold
`those of healthy
`controls.
`In
`contrast,
`15 of
`the
`18 UA patients
`had TpP
`concentrations
`approximating
`that of
`the controls,
`as did the
`patients
`diagnosed with
`other
`chest pain (e.g., angina pectoris,
`Of
`pulmonary
`edema,
`anxiety,
`indigestion).
`and
`the
`3 UA
`who had increased TpP,
`all progressed
`patients
`to MI within
`by the diagnosis on discharge.
`48 h, as indicated
`into four
`In the second study,
`the patients were categorized
`separate groups: MI
`patients who presented
`to the ER <6 h
`the onset of chest pain (n = 21); MI patients presenting
`after
`to
`the ER >6 h after
`the onset of chest pain, most of whom had CK
`with other
`>150 U/L
`(n =
`33); patients
`diagnosed
`chest
`pain
`(n =
`130); and patients diagnosed with other conditions
`associ-
`
`Other
`Controls Chest Pain
`(n=45)
`(n=130)
`
`MI Late
`Ml Early
`Presenters Presenters
`(n=21)
`(n=33)
`
`50 -
`
`40 -
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`4II
`
`Ml Patients
`n=15
`
`Other Chest
`Pain
`n=14
`
`Unstable
`Angina
`n=18
`
`Healthy
`Controls
`n=13
`
`Progressedto Ml
`
`.j
`
`E
`
`0.
`0.
`I.-
`
`44
`
`.
`
`..
`
`*
`
`600 -
`
`550-
`
`500 -
`
`450 -
`
`400-
`
`350 -
`
`300-
`
`250 -
`
`200-
`
`150 -
`
`100 -
`
`so-
`
`25
`
`-
`
`initial study) patients recruited for the GUSTO intervention study and (right
`Fig. 2. TpP data for (left
`with chest pain symptomatic of Ml.
`One point (*,
`right panel) was offscale
`(82 mg/LI.
`
`second study) patients presenting to the ER
`
`

`
`1540
`
`Carville
`
`et al.: Thrombus
`
`precursor
`
`protein
`
`of highly specific probes (MAbs)
`[1]. The
`generation
`conditions
`to be technically
`difficult
`[19]
`has proven
`for
`fibrin
`intact
`to its
`and conformationally
`similar
`because fibrin
`is structurally
`and to the plasmin-derived
`deg-
`precursor
`protein
`(fibrinogen)
`radation
`products
`of
`fibrin, which include D-dimer.
`To over-
`come this problem, we used antigen-free
`technology
`to generate
`(MHI),
`a fibrin-specific
`which
`recognizes
`a conforma-
`MAb
`tional epitope found only on the intact polymeric
`fibrin
`struc-
`antibody
`is used as the specific
`capture MAb
`ture [19].This
`in
`the TpP test.
`pain
`of chest
`from onset
`the time
`samples,
`study
`In the first
`to ER presentation
`were
`h. Specificity
`and sensitivity
`was <6
`thrombosis
`leading
`to MI.
`coronary
`100% for
`data
`These
`test has clinical
`potential
`in combination
`indicate
`that
`the TpP
`other
`tests
`for both rule-in
`and rule-out
`early in the clinical
`with
`event, when intervention
`with clot-dissolving
`therapies
`and (or)
`is beneficial
`for
`[13].
`angioplasty
`salvage
`of cardiac muscle
`Results from the second study support
`the finding
`from the
`GUSTO study.
`(n = 300),
`In this
`(second)
`expanded
`study
`the
`of TpP in MI patients presenting
`concentrations
`early after
`the
`onset of chest pain were
`increased by as much as 18 times above
`TpP
`that observed in a healthy
`control
`population.
`However,
`concentrations
`increased in patients
`presenting
`were not
`>6 h
`after the onset of chest pain, andwho had high concentrations
`of
`markers of cardiac damage (total CK).
`Indeed,
`in many of
`the
`MI patients who were early presenters
`and had above-normal
`concentrations
`of TpP,
`subsequent
`samples at 12 and 24 h
`the TpP concentrations
`off as the concen-
`showed
`that
`dropped
`trations
`of other
`cardiac markers
`(e.g.,
`total CK)
`began
`to
`increase (Fig.
`3). These
`findings
`are in agreement with
`the
`that TpP has
`pathological
`in MI, and suggest
`processes
`involved
`the potential
`to detect
`the initial
`thrombotic
`occlusive process in
`MI, which occurs before
`and overlaps with the ischemic
`stages of
`the disease (Fig. 4). A large patient
`study is currently
`underway
`to define
`the temporal
`relationship
`between
`TpP
`and the
`necrosis: CK, CK1VIB, cardiac
`following
`markers
`of cardiac
`I, and myoglobin.
`troponin
`the
`In most UA patients,
`were within
`concentrations
`TpP
`(as
`some who had active thrombosis
`reference
`interval,
`but
`by the TpP test) progressed
`to MI. Although
`larger
`indicated
`that
`the
`studies
`are required,
`these
`initial
`observations
`indicate
`TpP test may have an important
`role in risk stratification
`clinical
`
`MARKER
`
`TpP
`
`STAGE OF INJURY
`
`Thrombosis
`& Occlusion
`
`Small Cardiac
`Proteins
`
`lschemia
`
`Larger Cardiac
`Proteins (e.g.CK,
`CKMB)
`
`Necrosis
`
`0
`
`12
`6
`Time from Onset of Chest Pain (hours)
`
`Fig. 4. Potential utility of TpP and other biochemical markers for
`diagnosing thrombosis in early MI.
`
`-#{149}--PtA
`PtB
`-e--
`
`-U--
`
`-a-
`
`---
`
`-.O--.
`
`-#{149}-
`
`-#{149}-
`
`ptD
`PtE
`PtF
`
`PtG
`PtH
`
`ER
`
`12
`
`24
`
`49
`
`Time (hours)
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`E 0
`
`.
`
`0
`
`Time (hours)
`
`Fig. 3. Concentrations of TpP and CK in eight Ml patients presenting to
`
`the ER early (<6 h) after the onset of chest pain.
`
`Discussion
`remains the leading
`cause of death in the developed
`Thrombosis
`the reasons for
`[2]. Among
`this is that clinical
`condi-
`countries
`tions induced by thrombosis
`not diagnosed until
`are frequently
`after acute clinical
`become manifest
`and tissue dam-
`symptoms
`age has occurred
`[22]. One such clinical
`condition
`induced
`in
`most
`cases by coronary
`is MI. Definitive
`thrombosis
`early
`diagnosis of MI
`is difficult
`because the ECG has a diagnostic
`sensitivity
`of only
`[23] and the biochemical markers
`50-70%
`(CKMB,
`troponin,
`etc.) are increased
`only after
`the death of
`cardiac tissue.
`in delays
`in MI patients can result
`problems
`These diagnostic
`and misdiagnosis.
`As has been
`in appropriate
`intervention
`in the interventional
`trials,
`thrombo-
`conclusively
`demonstrated
`lytic
`intervention
`of chest pain can
`within 5 h after
`the onset
`substantially
`reduce mortality
`and salvage cardiac muscle [13].
`there is a clear clinical need for a diagnostic modality
`Therefore,
`that can detect active thrombosis
`to aid in the administration
`of
`appropriate
`therapies [13, 23].
`In the current
`study, we describe
`how a new diagnostic
`assay,
`the TpP test, can measure active
`in MI patients
`thrombosis
`early after
`pain
`the onset of chest
`even though the patients still have no detectable increase in the
`biochemical markers of cardiac necrosis.
`detected by the TpP test have
`polymeric
`fibrin
`The
`species
`in patients with MI and other
`been demonstrated
`thrombotic
`
`

`
`ClinicalChemistiy 42, No.
`
`9, 1996
`
`1541
`
`in
`
`in
`
`cases of UA are recorded
`1 million
`for MI. About
`of UA patients
`at ERs
`in the US each year, of whom an estimated
`10-15% will
`[7, 24]. UA patients
`progress
`to MI
`with
`ongoing
`coronary
`thrombosis
`may
`benefit
`from thrombolytic
`intervention
`with
`[25, 26]. By detect-
`tissue plasminogen
`activator
`or streptokinase
`the TpP test has
`the
`ing active
`thrombosis,
`potential
`to be a
`beneficial
`aid in patient
`selection
`for thrombolytic
`therapy
`in the
`of a hospital ER.
`acute-care
`environment
`conditions
`clinical
`MI and UA are just
`two of the potential
`could
`have
`diagnostic
`which
`this
`for
`active
`thrombosis
`test
`The TpP
`itself
`to application
`utility.
`test may
`also
`lend
`complication
`postoperative
`thrombosis,
`a major
`in
`patients
`and
`orthopedic
`procedures
`undergoing
`thoracic,
`abdominal,
`DVT is responsible
`[27, 28]. Postoperative
`for
`increased
`mor-
`tality
`in surgical
`patients,
`its
`clinical
`sequela
`of pulmonary
`embolism
`being
`the
`largest
`single
`cause
`of postoperative
`mor-
`tality [2 7-29]. Although
`great
`strides
`have been made
`in devel-
`oping
`interventional
`and prophylactic
`therapies
`for postopera-
`tive thrombosis,
`one of the most
`important
`needs
`for
`improving
`the
`efficacy
`of
`these
`approaches
`is a specific
`assay
`capable
`detecting
`active
`thrombosis
`to identify
`those
`patients
`requiring
`Intrasurgical monitoring
`additional
`anticoagulation
`of ac-
`[27].
`tive
`thrombosis
`is also an important
`clinical
`need
`during
`such
`procedures
`as angioplasty,
`where
`thrombus
`formation
`at
`the site
`of vascular
`damage
`can result
`in abrupt
`closure
`of the coronary
`MI, emergency
`vessel and lead to periprocedural
`coronary
`artery
`or death [30].
`bypass
`surgery,
`
`of
`
`the TpP test
`for
`specific
`to be highly
`appears
`In conclusion,
`thrombosis;
`as such,
`it has many
`potential
`clinical
`intravascular
`Ongoing
`large-scale
`studies
`include
`chest
`pain
`applications.
`cardiac
`catheterization,
`thrombosis
`as a conse-
`management,
`quence
`of trauma,
`and postsurgical
`monitoring
`of DVT.
`
`the protein C
`
`References
`Increased
`1. Francis CW, Conaghan DG, Scott WL, Marder VJ.
`plasma concentrations
`of cross-linked fibrin polymers in acute
`myocardial
`infarction. Circulation 1987;75:117O-6.
`2. Hirsh J, Salzman EW, Marder VJ, Colman RW. Overview of
`the
`thrombotic
`process and its therapy.
`In: Colman RW, Hirsh J,
`Marder VJ, Salzman EW, eds. Hemostasis and thrombosis: basic
`principles and clinical practice. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1994:
`1151-63.
`3. Clouse
`of hemostasis:
`LH, Comp PC. The regulation
`system. N EngI J Med 1986;314:1298-304.
`4. Comp PC, Esmon CT. Recurrent venous thromboembolism in
`patients with a partial deficiency of protein S. N EngI J Med
`1984:311:1525-8.
`5. Vikydal R, Koringer C, Kyrle PA, Niessner H, Pabinger I, Thaler E,
`Lechner K. The prevalence of hereditary antithrombin-III-deficiency
`in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism.
`Thromb
`Haemost 1985;54:744-5.
`6. National Center
`for Health Statistics. Publ. No.
`1993;94-1232.
`and throm-
`7. Cairns JA, Cohen M. Unstable angina-antithrombotics
`In: Fuster V, Verstraete M, eds. Thrombosis in cardiovas-
`bolytics.
`cular disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992:237-60.
`8. Harker LA, Mann KG. Thrombosis and fibrinolysis.
`In: Fuster V,
`Verstraete M, eds. Thrombosis in cardiovascular disorders. Phila-
`delphia: WB Saunders, 1992:1-16.
`9. De Wood MA, Spores J, Notske R, Mouser LI, Burroughs R,
`
`(PHS) DHHS
`
`il
`
`Golden MS, Lang I. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during
`N EngI J Med
`the early hours of transmural
`myocardial
`infarction.
`1980;303:897-9O2.
`10. Fuster VL, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coro-
`nary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes. N EngI
`J Med 1992;326:242-5O.
`Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wave
`front phenomenon of
`ischemic cell death. Myocardial
`infarction
`size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;
`56:786-93.
`12. Cannon CP, Antman EM, Walls R, Braunwald E. Time as an
`adjunctive agent
`to thrombolytic
`therapy. J Thromb Ihrombol
`1994;1:27-34.
`13. Roberts R, Kleiman NS. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of acute
`infarction necessitates the need for a new diagnostic mind-set.”
`1994:89:872-81.
`Circulation
`14. Lee TH, Goldman L. Serum enzyme assays in the diagnosis of
`acute myocardial
`infarction. Ann Intern Med 1986;i.O5:221-33.
`15. Apple FS. Acute myocardial
`infarction and coronary reperfusion:
`serum cardiac markers for the 1990’s. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;
`97:217-26.
`16. Apple FS. Glycogen phosphorylase BB and other cardiac proteins:
`challenge to creatine kinase MB as the marker
`for detecting
`myocardial
`injury [Editoriall. Clin Chem 1995;4i.:963-5.
`17. Hirsch DR, Goldhaber SZ. Blood tests that predict venous throm-
`bosis and the relation of these blood tests to primary (inherited)
`and acquired risk factors.
`In: Goldhaber SZ, ed. Prevention of
`thromboembolism. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993:3-24.
`18. Bauer K, Rosenberg R. The pathophysiology
`of the prethrombotic
`state in humans:
`insights gained from studies using markers of
`hemostatic system activation. Blood 1987;7O:343-50.
`19. Gargan PE, Gaffney PJ, Pleasants JR, Ploplis VA. A monoclonal
`region unique to the intact
`antibody which recognizes
`an epitopic
`1993;7:275-83.
`fibrin
`polymeric
`structure.
`Fibrinolysis
`20. The GUSTO investigators. An international
`randomized trial com-
`paring four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial
`infarction.
`N Engl J Med 1993;329:67-82.
`21. Gargan PE, Dimitrijevic N, Scheu JO, Walsh M. An immunochemi-
`cal assay for
`the measurement
`of soluble fibrin polymers in
`plasma [Abstract]. Thromb Haemostas 1993;69:1003.
`22. Vogel G, Spanuth E. Predictive value of
`in
`fibrin monomers
`postoperative deep vein thrombosis.
`KIm Wochenschr 199O;68:
`1020-6.
`23. Stevenson R. AMI diagnosis could save billions. AACC National
`Meeting Workshop, Chicago, IL, 1992:28-33.
`24. Chesebro JH, Fuster V. Thrombosis in unstable angina. N EngI
`J Med 1992:327:192-4.
`25. Collen 0. Fibrin selective thrombolytic therapy for acute myocar-
`dial
`infarction. Circulation 1996;93:857-65.
`26. Sobel BE. Thrombolysis
`in the treatment of acute myocardial
`infarction.
`In: Fuster V, Verstraete M, eds. Thrombosis in cardio-
`vascular disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1992:289-326.
`27. National
`Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference
`Statement. Bethesda, MD: US Govt Printing Office, 1986;491-
`292:41120.
`28. Salzman EW, Hirsh J. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, and natu-
`ral history of venous thrombosis.
`In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder
`VJ, Salzman EW. Hemostasis and thrombosis:
`basic principles
`and clinical
`practice. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott,
`1994:
`1275-96.
`29. Weinmann
`EE, Salzman EW. Deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med
`1994;331:163O-41.
`30. de Feyter PJ, de Jaegere PP, Suruys PW. Incidence, predictors and
`of acute coronary occlusion after coronary angio-
`management
`plasty. Am Heart J 1994:127:643-51.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket