throbber
(CANCER RESEARCH 58. 3163-3172.
`
`July 15. 1W8|
`
`Retinoic Acid Induced Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP)/Extracellular Signal-
`regulated Kinase (ERK) Kinase-dependent MAP Kinase Activation Needed
`to Elicit HL-60 Cell Differentiation and Growth Arrest1
`
`Andrew Yen,2 Mark S. Roberson, Susi Varvayanis, and Amy T. Lee
`
`Ctincer ßioloi>\Laboratory. Department of Piilh(>log\ ¡A.Y., S. V., A. T. L.j. and Department of Plivxiologv IM. S. R.I. College of Veterinary Medicine. Cornell Universitv.
`New York 14853
`
`Ithaca,
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`kinase
`signal-regulated
`Retinoic acid (RA) activated the extracellular
`(ERK)
`2 mitogen-activated
`protein kinase
`(MAPK)
`of HL-60 human
`myeloblastic
`leukemia cells before causing myeloid differentiation and cell
`cycle arrest associated with hypophosphorylation
`of the retinoblastoma
`(RB)
`tumor suppressor
`protein. ERK2 activation by mitogen-activated
`protein/ERK kinase (MEK) was necessary for RA-induced differentiation
`in studies using PD98059
`to block MEK phosphorylation. G0 growth
`arrest and RB tumor suppressor protein hypophosphorylation
`(which is
`typically associated with induced differentiation
`and (•„arrest),
`two pu-
`tatively RB-regulated
`processes,
`also depended on ERK2 activation by
`MEK. Activation of ERK2 by RA occurred within hours and persisted
`until
`the onset of RB hypophosphorylation,
`differentiation,
`and arrest.
`ERK2 activation was probably needed early, because delaying the addi
`tion of PD98059 relative to that of RA restored most of the RA-induced
`cellular response.
`In contrast
`to RA (which activates RA receptors
`(RARs)
`and retinoid X receptors
`in HL-60 cells with its metabolite
`retinoids), a
`retinoid that selectively binds RAR-y, which is not expressed in HL-60
`cells, was relatively ineffective
`in causing ERK2 activation. This is con
`sistent with the need for a nuclear
`retinoid receptor
`function in RA-
`induced ERK2 activation. RA reduced the amount of unphosphorylated
`RAR-a, whose activation is necessary for RA-induced differentiation
`and
`arrest. This shifted the ratio of phosphorylated:unphosphorylated
`RAR-a
`to predominantly
`the phosphorylated
`form. Unlike other steroid thyroid
`hormone
`receptors
`susceptible
`to phosphorylation
`and activation
`by
`MAPKs, RAR-a was not phosphorylated
`by the activated ERK2 MAPK.
`The results thus show that RA augments MEK-dependent ERK2 activa
`tion that
`is needed for subsequent RB hypophosphorylation.
`cell differ
`entiation,
`and G0 arrest. The process
`seems
`to be nuclear
`receptor de
`pendent
`and an early
`seminal
`component
`of RA signaling
`causing
`differentiation
`and growth arrest.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`RA3 regulates cell cycle progression and differentiation in a variety
`
`(1). The molecular mode of action of RA may
`of cellular contexts
`involve various potential mechanisms
`reflecting the cellular activities
`of RA. These
`include:
`(a)
`retinoid activation
`of RAR and RXR
`transcription
`factors (2); (b) CBP-dependent
`inhibition of activator
`protein 1 (AP-1) activation (3-6);
`(c) histone acetylation (7-11);
`(d)
`retinoylation
`of cellular proteins
`(12-14);
`and (e) autocrine
`loops
`using growth inhibitors
`transforming growth factor ßor insulin-like
`growth factor binding protein 3 (15-20). A variety of potential
`sig-
`
`Rcceived 12/15/97; accepted 5/13/98.
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
`charges. This article must
`therefore be hereby marked advertisement
`in accordance with
`18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`1Supported in pan by grants from the NIH/National Cancer Institute (USPHS) and the
`United States Department of Agriculture.
`2 To whom requests for reprints should he addressed, at Cancer Biology Laboratory.
`Department of Pathology. College of Veterinary Medicine. Cornell University,
`Ithaca, NY
`14853.
`used are: RA. retinole acid; RAR. RA receptor; RXR. retinoid X
`' The abbreviations
`receptor; RB. retinoblastoma; ERK. extracellular
`signal-regulated
`kinase; MAPK, mito
`gen-activated protein kinase: MEK. mitogen-activated
`protein/ERK kinase; PDGF, plate
`let-derived growth factor: EOF. epidermal growth factor: TPA. 12-O-tetradecanoylphor-
`bol-13-acetate; GST. glutathione S-transferase.
`
`naling pathways have thus been implicated in effecting regulation of
`cell growth and differentiation by RA. In addition to these pathways,
`other as yet unspecified signaling routes may also be involved.
`Iden
`tifying these routes defines the earliest events of the mechanism used
`by RA to ultimately change cell growth and differentiation.
`The mechanism of action of RA has been intensely studied using
`various experimentally susceptible model systems. One of these is the
`HL-60 human myeloblastic
`leukemia cell
`line (21, 22). RA induces
`G,, arrest and myeloid differentiation
`in HL-60 cells, whereas other
`inducers,
`including
`1,25-dihydroxy
`vitamin D,,
`induce monocytic
`differentiation.
`In both cases, hypophosphorylation
`of the RB tumor
`suppressor protein, a putative cell cycle and differentiation
`regulator,
`is induced, consistent with RB as a downstream component of growth-
`regulatory
`signals by RA. The duration of the induced metabolic
`cascade culminating in the onset of G0 arrest and myeloid or mono
`cytic differentiation
`equals approximately
`two division cycles. This
`cascade segregates into two sequential segments (23-25). The "early"
`
`in duration to a division cycle, results in cells primed
`segment, equal
`to differentiate, but without
`lineage specificity.
`Its essential events are
`common to both myeloid and monocytic differentiation.
`If cells at this
`point, which is called precommitment,
`are further exposed to inducer
`for a period equal
`to another division cycle,
`they undergo myeloid or
`monocytic differentiation, depending on the character of the inducer.
`This "late" segment
`thus specifies differentiation
`lineage. The HL-60
`cell line has been used as an archetype model to study the RA-induced
`conversion of a differentiatively
`uncommitted,
`proliferatively
`active
`cell to a differentiated, G()-arrested cell.
`vi
`or 1,25-dihydroxy
`RA-induced HL-60 myeloid differentiation
`tamin D,-induced monocytic differentiation depends on the activity of
`a c-FMS-originated
`signal
`transduction cascade (26, 27). c-FMS is a
`transmembrane
`tyrosine kinase receptor of the PDGF subfamily (28,
`29). Signal
`transduction by such transmembrane
`tyrosine kinase re
`ceptors constitutes the prototypical mitogenic signal transduction cas
`cade. Such cascades have been intensively studied (30). Early re
`sponses in this cascade reflect
`the binding domains on the cytosolic
`domain of the receptor
`and are the activation of src-like kinases,
`phosphatidylinositol
`3'-kinase,
`ras-GTPase-activating
`protein,
`and
`phospholipase Cy. In contrast
`to PDGF receptors,
`the c-FMS cytoso
`lic domain apparently does not bind ras-GTPase-activating
`protein or
`phospholipase Cy. although it does bind the adaptor protein Grb-2 that
`forms an adaptor complex with SOS and may thus facilitate RAS
`activation. GTP activation of RAS and the consequent
`activation of
`the RAF serine-threonine
`kinase initiate a kinase cascade. RAF acti
`vates
`the dual-function MEK kinases,
`and these in turn activate
`MAPKs, prominent examples of which are ERK1 and ERK2, by both
`serine and tyrosine phosphorylation. The MAPKs phosphorylate
`and
`activate transcription factors of the Ets family, a prominent example
`of which is ELK1, which with SRF binds SRE DNA sequences
`to
`induce transcriptional
`activation. This is typically a prelude to DNA
`synthesis with cellular
`recruitment
`to S phase.
`It is thus somewhat
`enigmatic
`that
`in the case of
`these RA-treated HL-60 cells,
`the
`c-FMS-originated
`signal promotes G0 arrest and a cessation of DNA
`
`3163
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on March 18, 2016. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`Page 1 of 10
`
`Fluidigm
`Exhibit 1006
`
`

`
`RA INDUCED MEK-DEPENDENT MARK ACTIVATION
`
`the entire
`is whether
`itself
`synthesis. The question that presents
`prototypical mitogenic
`signal
`transduction
`cascade originating with
`c-FMS is recapitulated
`in driving induced G() arrest and differentia
`tion. If this is the case, then RA has redirected the mitogenic outcome
`of a prototypical mitogenic
`signal
`transduction
`cascade
`involving
`oncogenes from mitogenesis
`to G„arrest. The alternative to this is that
`c-FMS can also originate
`a novel
`signaling
`pathway
`promoting
`growth arrest
`instead of mitogenesis. One test of these alternatives
`is
`to determine whether the distal components of the putative mitogenic
`pathway, MEK and MAPK,
`are required to support RA-induced
`differentiation
`and G(, arrest.
`then
`If c-FMS promotes RA-induced cell differentiation and arrest,
`an obviously emerging question is how the c-FMS-originated
`signal
`integrates with the RA signal. RARs and RXRs are members of the
`steroid thyroid hormone receptor
`superfamily. A precedent
`for such
`signal
`integration
`has been established
`in the case of the estrogen
`receptor, where the receptor
`is phosphorylated
`by MAPK (31, 32).
`Phosphorylation
`of the estrogen receptor by EGF-stimulated MAPK
`activity results in activation of the estrogen receptor as a transcription
`factor. The activation is sufficiently potent
`that it can occur even for
`unliganded receptor.
`Interestingly,
`estrogen can also activate MAPK
`(33, 34). In the case of the vitamin D and retinoid receptors
`(RARs
`and RXRs). phosphorylation
`in the absence of ligand also results in
`activation.
`In this case, phosphorylation was induced by okadaic acid,
`a phosphatase inhibitor
`that can also activate MAPKs (35). Consistent
`with this, okadaic acid enhances RA-induced HL-60 cell differentia
`tion. In addition to phosphorylation,
`the expression of RAR-a can also
`be stimulated by EOF (36). In contrast,
`the tyrosine kinase inhibitor
`herbimycin A reduced phosphorylation
`as well as expression.
`It is thus
`apparent
`that
`transmembrane
`tyrosine kinase receptor
`signaling can
`phosphorylate
`and activate retinoid receptors. This suggests the pos
`sibility that c-FMS, a PDGF subfamily receptor, might,
`like an EGF
`receptor,
`also phosphorylate
`and activate retinoid receptors.
`If this
`should be the case,
`it would provide an obvious mechanistic rational
`ization for the interaction between the retinoid and c-FMS signals.
`The present studies were undertaken to assess the involvement of
`c-FMS-originated
`signaling in the mechanism of action of RA. They
`address the question of whether the prototypical mitogenic transmem
`brane tyrosine kinase RAS/RAF signaling pathway attributable
`to
`c-FMS is involved.
`In particular,
`the studies ask if ERK2 activation,
`a putative distal component of this signaling pathway,
`is needed for
`RA action. Two specific mechanistic
`aspects of this question were
`also investigated:
`(a) given that RA has potential nonnuclear effects,
`the effects on ERK2 activation of a retinoid without a nuclear receptor
`in HL-60 cells was determined:
`and (b) because
`a precedent
`for
`MAPK activation of the estrogen receptor exists,
`the ability of RA-
`stimulated ERK2 activation to enhance RAR-a phosphorylation was
`determined.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Cells and Culture Conditions. HL-60 human myeloblastic leukemia cells
`were maintained
`as stock cultures
`in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies,
`Inc.,
`Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 5% PCS (Intergen. Purchase, NY). The
`cultures were initiated at a density of 0.2 or 0.1 X IO6 cells/ml
`in 10-ml
`
`the medium every 2 or 3 days,
`of
`replacement
`using complete
`cultures
`1-week period consisted
`of
`two successive
`2-day
`respectively. A typical
`cultures
`followed by a 3-day culture. The doubling
`time of the cells was
`approximately
`21 h.
`In experiments where cells were treated with PD98059 (#9900; New Eng
`land Biolabs, Beverly. MA), cells were recultured at 0.5 X IO6 cells/ml using
`30-ml cultures 24 h before the start of measurements
`(defined as 0 h). PD98059
`was added from a 2 mM stock in DMSO to make a final concentration
`of
`2 x I0~6 M 16 h before the start of measurements. At 0 h. PD98059-treated
`
`cells were recultured at 0.2 X IO6 cells/ml using 30-ml cultures. At this time,
`
`by
`in culture
`the final concentration
`to increase
`readded
`PD98059 was
`2 X 10~6 M, and RA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was added from
`a 10~3 M stock in ethanol
`to make a final concentration
`of 10~6 M. At 16 h,
`
`in culture by
`the final concentration
`PD98059 was again added to increase
`2 X IO"6 M. In HL-60 cells,
`these three successive
`additions of 2 x 10~6 M
`
`effect, although they eliminated
`PD98059 had no apparent growth-inhibitory
`MAPK activation. This is a relatively low concentration
`compared to typical
`concentrations
`of 50 x 10~6 M added 1 h before treatment with fibroblast
`
`for 30 min to reduce activated MAPK, p42. or p44 below the
`growth factor
`limits detectable by Western blotting in other cell
`lines, as described by the
`manufacturer's
`specifications.
`In tests of the potential
`toxicity of PD98059.
`the
`growth of cultures
`initiated with 0.1. 1. 2. 10. 20. 50. and 100 x 10~6 M
`PD98059 was assayed over 72 h. A concentration
`of 20 X 10~" M caused G,
`arrest and toxicity. Only a slight G,
`retardation was detectable
`at 10 X 10~6
`
`(a) control cells cultured
`cases were also studied:
`M. Three other experimental
`as described above, but without PD98059 or RA; (b) cells cultured and treated
`with PD98059 as described above, but without RA; and (c) cells cultured and
`treated with RA, but without PD98059. Cells were harvested
`from these
`cultures
`for assays of cell growth, cell cycle distribution,
`cell differentiation,
`RB expression,
`activated MAPK expression,
`total MAPK protein expression,
`RAR-a
`expression,
`and in vitro MAPK kinase
`activity
`against ELK1 or
`RAR-a. All data shown are typical of three repeats.
`In the case of delayed addition of PD98059.
`cultures were initiated at
`0.2 X IO6 cells/ml
`in 30-ml cultures in the absence or presence of I0~6 M RA.
`
`of 2 /J.Mand added
`PD98059 was added at 16 h to make a final concentration
`again at 32 h to increase the final concentration
`by 2 /AM.Cells were harvested
`at the indicated times to assay cell differentiation,
`cell cycle arrest, cell density,
`and RB expression.
`the retinoid
`the effects of the RAR--y ligand.
`to determine
`In experiments
`ligand CD437 was used. Cultures were initiated at a cell density of 0.2 X IO6
`cells/ml using 30-ml cultures with no addition (control).
`10~6 M RA. or IO"6
`M CD437. CD437 is a RAR--y selective ligand with IC50 displacement
`values
`for 9-c/i-RA-bound
`RAR-a, RAR-/3, and RAR-y of 7300. 3900. and 90 nM,
`respectively. The CD437 was added to cultures from a stock solution of 5 mM
`in ethanol.
`stored at —¿(cid:3)86°C,and protected from light. CD437 was a generous
`gift of Drs. Art Levin and Micheal Klaus (Hoftman-LaRoche.
`Inc.. Nutley, NJ
`and Basel, Switzerland). At indicated times, cells were harvested for Western
`analysis of activated MAPK and total MAPK as well as cell density and
`differentiation.
`identical cultures
`In the case of in vitro kinase activity assays for MAPK,
`manipulated with or without PD98059 or RA as described above were initiated
`at staggered times to allow their simultaneous
`harvest. The kinase assays were
`thus performed
`simultaneously
`for all
`time points being compared. For
`the
`assay of MAPK activity on an ELK1 substrate, HL-60 cells were cultured as
`described above with or without PD98059 or RA.
`In the case of assays of
`MAPK activity in TPA-treated cells. TPA from a 0.5 mg/ml stock was added
`to 4 X IO6 exponentially
`growing cells resuspended
`in 10 ml of medium to
`make a final concentration
`of 1 X 10~6 M TPA. After 15 min of treatment,
`the
`
`out of the suspension. For the assay of
`cells were harvested by centrifugation
`MAPK activity on a RAR-a
`substrate, RAR-a was immunoprecipitated
`from
`exponentially
`proliferating HL-60 cells and used in lieu of ELK1 in the kinase
`assay.
`Assays of cell growth by meas
`and Differentiation.
`Assays of Growth
`uring cell density and distribution
`in the cell cycle and assays of cell differ
`entiation detected by inducible oxidative metabolism were performed as de
`scribed previously (25, 37). Briefly, cell density in experimental
`cultures was
`measured by repeated counts with a hemacytometer. Viability was assessed by
`the exclusion of 0.2% trypan blue dye and was routinely at least 95% in all
`cultures. The distribution
`of cells
`in the cell cycle was determined
`by flow
`cytometry
`using propidium iodide-stained
`nuclei. A total of 0.5 X IO6 cells
`
`in 0.5 ml of hypotonie
`was harvested at each indicated time and resuspended
`propidium iodide solution (50 mg/liter propidium iodide.
`1 g/liter
`sodium
`citrate, and 0.1 % Triton X-100) and stored, refrigerated,
`and protected from the
`light until analyzed. Flow cytometric analysis was done with a multipararneter
`dual-laser
`fluorescence-activated
`cell sorter
`(EPICS: Coulter Electronics, Hi-
`aleah, FL) using 200 mW of 488 nm excitation from a tunable argon ion laser.
`Functional differentiation
`to a mature myelomonocytic
`phenotype
`capable of
`inducible
`oxidative metabolism was
`assayed
`by
`phorbol
`12-myristate
`
`3164
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on March 18, 2016. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`Fluidigm
`Exhibit 1006
`
`

`
`RA INDUCED MEK-DEPENDENT MARK ACTIVATION
`
`resulting in
`oxidative metabolism,
`13-acetate (Sigma Chemical Co.)-inducible
`an intrucellular
`reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium to formazan by Superoxide.
`A total of 0.2 x 10'' cells were harvested at the indicated times and resus-
`
`200
`tetrazolium in PBS containing
`pended in 0.2 ml of 2 mg/ml nitroblue
`ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate
`13-acetate. The cell suspension was incubated for
`20 min in a 37"C water bath with occasional vortexing and then scored using
`a hemacytometer
`for the percentage of cells expressing intracellular blue-black
`formazan precipitated
`by superoxide.
`Western Analysis of RB, MAPK, and Activated MAPK. Western blot
`ting of RB. MAPK. and activated MAPK was done using whole-cell
`lysates
`from cells cultured as indicated. At
`the indicated times. 10* cells were har
`vested and fixed in I ml of 90% methanol at —¿(cid:3)80°Cas described previously
`(38. 39). The cells were stored at -20°C until analysis by SDS-PAGE. Cells
`
`[6% SDS. 4 M urea, 4 mM EDTA.
`were solubilized in 50 /¿Iof loading buffer
`blue, and 35 ¿¿I/mlß-mercaptoeth-
`125 mM Tris (pH 6.9). 0.25% bromphenol
`anol] by immersion in a boiling water bath for 5 min. SDS-PAGE was done
`using a 4% stacking
`gel and a 10% resolving
`gel with a 37.5:1 ratio of
`acrylamide:bis.
`Samples were electrophoresed
`for approximately
`1200 V X h
`(typically 75 V for 16 h). A total of I X IO6cells was loaded per lane. Proteins
`were electrotransferred
`(Trans Blot Cell: Bio-Rad Inc., Hercules. CA) from the
`gel
`to a nitrocellulose membrane. Transfer was done at 0.4 A for 2 h. The
`resulting membrane was blocked
`by immersion
`overnight
`at 4°C in 5%
`
`powdered milk and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS. The membranes were probed
`with antibodies detecting the phosphorylated
`and unphosphorylated
`forms of
`RB. ERK2. and ERK1;
`the activated forms of ERK2 and ERK1 bearing a
`Thr-Glu-Tyr motif with Thr11" and Tyr1*5 phosphorylation:
`or the phospho
`rylated and unphosphorylated
`forms of RAR-a. The antibody to detect RB [RB
`Gene Product
`(mAbl
`) Monoclonal Antibody: Zymed Laboratories. South San
`Francisco. CA] was used at 0.4 /j.g/ml PBS with an overnight
`incubation at
`room temperature. The antibody to detect ERK2 and ERKI
`[C-14 (SC154
`rabbit polyclonal
`antibody): Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
`Inc.. Santa Cruz. CA]
`was used at 0.1 X 10~6 g/ml
`in PBS with a 1-h incubation at room temper
`
`in 300 /*! of lysis buffer containing
`in 1 ml of ice-cold PBS and resuspended
`25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 25 mM ß-glycerophosphate. 3 mM EDTA. 3 mM
`EGTA. 250 mM NaCl. 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate.
`2 HIM
`DTT. 0.01 mg/ml aprotinin. 0.01 mg/ml
`leupetin. and I mM phenylmelhylsul-
`fonyl
`fluoride (added freshly before use) for 15 min on ice. The whole-cell
`lysate was clarified by centrifugation
`using a microfuge
`for 5 min at 4°C.and
`
`by adding 10 ^.1of an
`ERK activity in the supernatant was immunoprecipilated
`ERK-specific
`antibody (C-14; Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
`Inc.) and 20 jitl of
`protein A/G Plus-agarose
`beads
`(A/G Plus Agarose
`562(X)2: Santa Cruz
`Biotechnology.
`Inc.). This
`suspension was mixed for 3-4
`h at 4°C.The
`immunoprecipitates were washed three times (3500 rpm. 2.5-min microcen-
`trifugation)
`in 0.5 ml of
`lysis buffer and once in 0.5 ml of kinase buffer
`containing
`20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5). 20 mM magnesium chloride.
`25 mM
`ß-glycerophosphate. 100 JIM sodium orthovanadate.
`2 mM DTT. and 20 /XM
`ATP. The immunoprecipitated
`kinase complex was then resuspended in 50 ¡JL\
`of kinase buffer with IO /¿Ciof [-y-12P]ATP (BLU502H:
`specific activity. 3000
`
`in 50 mM Tricine; Easy Tides: DuPont New England
`5 mCi/ml
`Ci/mmol:
`Nuclear, Boston, MA), and approximately
`1 fig of GST-ELK 1 fusion protein
`(1 ¿¿g/jil)was added. The kinase reaction proceeded for 30 min at 3()°Cwith
`
`frequent mixing. The reaction was terminated by doubling the volume with 2X
`SDS lysis buffer and immersion
`in a boiling water bath for 2.5 min. The
`reaction mixture was then subjected to SDS-PAGE using a 4% stacking gel
`and a 10% resolving gel run at 150 V for 3-4 h. The reaction products were
`visualized by autoradiography.
`of
`In vitro MAPK activity on RAR-a was measured by the phosphorylalion
`RAR-a
`synthesized
`in a reticulolysate
`expression
`system. RAR-a was ex
`pressed from a RAR-a
`cDNA fragment cloned as an £iV»RIfragment
`into a
`pSG5 expression vector using a T7 bacterial promoter
`for reliculocyte
`expres
`sion (43. 44). Reticulocyte
`expression was performed according to the instruc
`tions of the manufacturer
`(TNT T7 Reticulocyte Lysate System: Promega.
`Inc.).
`
`rabbit
`ature. The antibody used to detect activated ERKI and ERK2 (V667I
`polyclonal
`antibody; Promega.
`Inc.. Madison. Wl) was used at 0.025 10~6
`
`RESULTS
`
`in 0.1 % BSA with a 2-h incubation at room temperature. Detection was
`g/ml
`performed using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
`secondary antimurine or
`antirabbit
`antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence
`(ECL Kit; Amersham,
`Arlington Heights.
`IL) following the manufacturer's
`instructions. The rabbit
`
`polyclonal antibody used to detect RAR-a was RPa(F). which was a generous
`gift of Dr. Pierre Chambón (INSERM,
`Facultéde Médecine,Strasbourg.
`France; Ref. 40). It was used at a 1:1000 dilution with a 1-3-h incubation at
`room temperature.
`of UK I or RAR-a.
`In Vitro Kinase Assays of MAPK Phosphorylation
`In vitro MAPK kinase activity was measured by phosphorylation
`of a recom
`binant ELK 1 substrate, one of the in vint targets of MAPK. The transcriptional
`activation domain of human ELK1 (amino acids 307-428) was obtained by
`PCR from HeLa cell cDNA and confirmed by nucleotide
`sequence analysis
`(41). The ELK1 transactivation
`domain was cloned into pGEX3 to produce a
`GST-ELK 1 fusion gene. The GST-ELK 1 fusion protein was expressed
`in
`bacteria and was partially purified as described previously (42).
`The in vitro kinase assay for ERKs was performed as described previously
`(41). Briefly, after the indicated treatments, 4 X IO6 HL-60 cells were washed
`
`RA Causes MEK-dependent ERK2 Activation. RA caused the
`activation of ERK2 detected by its phosphorylation
`at Thr""
`and
`Tyrlx5. HL-60 cells were cultured in the absence (control) or presence
`of 10~6 M RA. At sequential
`times, cells were harvested for Western
`
`analysis. Fig. 1 shows the Western blot analysis for cells at 0, 1,4, 12,
`16, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h using an antibody specific for the phospho
`rylated Thr183 and Tyr'"5 of a Thr-Glu-Tyr motif characterizing
`activated ERKI or ERK2. (As discussed below. HL-60 cells express
`very little ERKI
`relative to ERK2, making ERK2 the predominant
`species.) All
`lanes were loaded with the same number of cells. RA
`increased the amount of activated ERK2 per cell by 4 h. Fig. 1 also
`shows the results when Western blotting is performed with an anti
`body detecting both unphosphorylated
`and phosphorylated
`ERK2.
`Phosphorylation
`causes a mobility shift on SDS-PAGE,
`resulting in
`distinguishable
`faster-migrating
`unphosphorylated ERK2 and slower-
`migrating phosphorylated ERK2. By 4 h of RA treatment,
`there was
`
`1C
`RA I.
`
`KA.4C
`
`RA ('+ RA*12C
`
`R A
`
`( « HA.16<
`
`RA
`
`C* RA +2-1C
`
`H \
`
`(
`
`.iH \-•••••^•H72i
`. K \ .481
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`K -.
`
`
`
`k v C« R\«•¡•••••••196("K \
`
`(
`
`.
`
`K \
`
`active MAPK
`
`F.rk-2
`
`for cells that were untreated controls (C). treated with RA (RA). treated with PD98059 (C+).
`l. Western analysis of activated ERK2 (top panels) and lotal ERK2 (bottom panels)
`Fig.
`or treated with RA plus PD98059 (RA + ) at the indicated limes (hours) of RA Ireatment. PD98059 (final concentration.
`2 ¡a»)was added 16 h before the addition of RA at 0 h. when
`it was added again, and 16 h after the addition of RA. Activated ERK2 was detected by Western blotting using an antibody specific for ERK2 dual-phosphorylated
`at the Thr-Glu-Tyr
`motif. ERK2 detected by Western blotting showed the distinct slower-mobility
`band characteristic of phosphorylated F.RK2. which paralleled the occurrence of activated ERK2. and
`showed that a loss of activated ERK2 due to PD98059 reflected a loss of the phosphorylated ERK2 and not the elimination of the total amount of ERK2. Data in this and all other
`figures are typical of three repeats.
`
`3165
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on March 18, 2016. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`Page 3 of 10
`
`Fluidigm
`Exhibit 1006
`
`

`
`RA INDUCED MEK-DEPENDENT MARK ACTIVATION
`
`Cell
`
`cycle
`
`arrest
`
`00-90-80-,
`
`._—A
`
`—¿(cid:3)•*—CRAOPD98059RA+PD98059
`
`__.
`
`-A
`
`72
`
`96
`
`time
`
`(hrs)
`
`70-
`
`60
`
`SO
`
`40
`
`O *
`
`Fig. 4. The percentage of cells with G, DNA measured by flow cytometry for untreated
`controls (O), RA-treated HL-60 cells (A), PD98059-treated HL-60 cells (•).or RA plus
`PD98059-treated HL-60 cells (A) at
`the indicated times of RA treatment. Cells were
`treated as described in the Fig. 1 legend.
`
`RA. Cells were pretreated with PD98059 before the addition of RA to
`allow clearance of existing activated MEK and ERK2. Fig. 1 shows
`that
`treatment of control cells with PD98059 resulted in a loss of
`activated ERK2 detected by Western blotting for activated ERK2,
`which was verified by a loss of the lower-mobility
`phosphorylated
`ERK2 detected by blotting for total ERK2. The absence of detectable
`activated ERK2 relative to untreated controls was apparent
`at
`the
`outset of RA addition and thereafter
`up to 72 h. At 96 h,
`the
`attenuation in untreated control cells is probably due to nutritional
`deprivation
`and parallels
`reduced growth and culture degeneration.
`Inhibition of ERK2 activation was also verified by in vitro kinase
`activity as shown in Fig. 2. In RA-treated
`cells,
`the RA-induced
`activation
`of ERK2 is also suppressed
`by PD98059. Assayed by
`Western blotting for either activated ERK2 or phosphorylated ERK2,
`ERK2 activation was suppressed during the 48 h typically needed for
`RA to induce the onset of differentiation and G,,-specific growth arrest
`(Figs. 3 and 4). In vitro kinase assays also corroborated
`that RA-
`induced ERK2 activation was inhibited by PD98059. At later times,
`RA could apparently slightly overcome
`the inhibitor by causing a
`minor amount of activated ERK2, probably reflecting a loss of effec
`tiveness of the drug with prolonged times. For example,
`some RA-
`induced ERK2 in vitro kinase activity is apparent at 48 h (Fig. 2), and
`some activated ERK2 is apparent by Western blotting at 72 h. It
`should be noted that the 2 /J.Mdose of PD98059 used repeatedly here
`is relatively low compared to typical values of 50 /AMused to suppress
`growth factor activation of ERKs. There was no apparent
`loss of
`viability or growth inhibition associated with this treatment.
`HL-60 cells express predominantly
`the M, 42,000 ERK2 and only
`a minor amount of A/r 44,000 ERK1. The Western analysis of whole-
`cell
`lysates in Fig. 1 using an antibody detecting activated ERK1 or
`ERK2 reveals only the Mr 42,000 ERK2. Likewise, Western blotting
`using an antibody detecting total ERK1 or ERK2 indicates only the
`ERK2. Using prolonged autoradiographic
`film exposures,
`it has been
`possible
`to detect
`the M, 44,000 ERK1 in whole-cell
`lysates of
`untreated HL-60 cells and of HL-60 cells treated with RA for 48 h.
`Densitometric
`scanning
`of
`these Western
`blot
`autoradiographs
`showed that approximately 95% of the ERK was ERK2, and 5% was
`ERK1 (data not shown). The ratio explains why only the ERK2
`appears in most films. RA induced no apparent change in the ratio. It
`should be noted that due to the limited number of lanes available per
`3166
`
`band corresponding to the phosphoryl-
`an enhanced slower-migrating
`ated ERK2,
`thereby verifying the Western analysis detecting only
`activated ERK2. The Western blot for total ERK2 protein also indi
`cates that whereas RA increased the amount of activated ERK2,
`there
`was no gross change detectable in the total amount of ERK.2 per cell.
`RA-induced ERK2 activation persisted 48 h after the addition of
`RA. The Western blots for activated ERK2 and total ERK2 show
`enhanced activated ERK2 by 4 h, but due to saturation of the auto-
`radiograph, which occurred for the strong signal to visualize the weak
`signal,
`it is not clear whether the enhancement persisted by 24 h. The
`in vitro kinase activity of ERK2 immunoprecipitated
`from HL-60
`cells after 0, 24, and 48 h of culture in the absence or presence of RA
`was measured. Kinase activity was measured by phosphorylation
`of a
`recombinant ELK1 fragment, an in vivo substrate for ERK2. Fig. 2
`shows
`the resulting
`autoradiograph. RA induced increased ERK2
`kinase activity present at 24 and 48 h compared with that at 0 h. Thus,
`RA-activated ERK2 persisted until
`the onset of differentiation
`and
`G()-specific growth arrest
`that was apparent by 48 h (Figs. 3 and 4).
`RA-induced ERK2 activation in HL-60 cells depended on MEK
`activation. Treatment with PD98059,
`a specific
`inhibitor of MEK
`phosphorylation
`and activation (45), resulted in the loss of activated
`ERK2 from HL-60 cells. PD98059 suppressed RA-induced ERK2
`activation. HL-60 cells were pretreated 16 h before the addition of RA
`(0 h), at the time of RA addition, and 16 h after the addition of RA.
`Control cells were treated analogously,
`but without
`the addition of
`
`Oh
`
`24h
`
`48h
`
`C C+ C RA C+ RA+ C RA C+ RA+
`
`
`
`•¿(cid:3)«•»-
`
`Elk-1
`
`Fig. 2. In vitro ERK.2 kinase activity on ELK1 for cells that were untreated controls
`(C>. treated with RA iKA>. treated with PD98059 <C+ ), or treated with RA plus PD98059
`(RA + ) at the indicated times of RA treatment, as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Although
`the persistent RA-enhanced ERK2 activation did not appear (o he great at 24 and 48 h due
`to X-ray film signal saturation,
`the kinase activity verifies that ERK2 activity was still
`strongly enhanced by RA at 24 and 48 h.
`
`Differentiation
`
`•¿(cid:3)•«—c
`
`-A— RA
`—¿(cid:3)•OPD98059
`-A—
`RA+PD98059
`
`A
`
`""
`
`A
`
`100 i
`
`80 -
`
`40 -
`
`20 •¿(cid:3)
`
`I
`
`24
`
`48
`
`72
`
`96
`
`time
`
`(hrs)
`
`differentiation marker,
`the functional
`of cells expressing
`Fig. 3. The percentage
`inducihle oxidative metabolism, detected by intracellular
`reduction of nitroblue tetrazo-
`lium (NUT) for untreated controls
`(O). RA-treated HL-60 cells (A), PD98059-lreated
`HL-60 cells (•).or RA plus PD98059-treated HL-60 cells (A) at the indicated times of
`RA treatment. Cells were treated as described in the Fig. 1 legend.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
`on March 18, 2016. © 1998 American Association for Cancer Research.cancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`Fluidigm
`Exhibit 1006
`
`

`
`RA INDUCED MEK-DEPENDENT MARK ACTIVATION
`
`occurred by 48 h. The fraction of
`induced functional differentiation
`the population that was differentiated
`increased progressively
`there
`after, with approximately 90% of the whole population differentiated
`by 72 h. Untreated control cells showed only low levels of spontane
`ous differentiation
`(approximately
`10%) that did not increase during
`culture.
`In cells where ERK2 activation was suppressed by the addi
`tion of PD98059, RA-induced differentiation was grossly suppressed.
`Only approximately 20% of the cells differentiated by 72 h, and few
`more differentiated thereafter. RA-induced functional differentiation
`thus required MEK-dependent ERK2 activation. PD98059 (2 JU.M),as
`used, had no observable effect on cell viability, which was routinely
`at least 95% in all of the cases (see also "Materials and Methods").
`RA-induced G()-specific growth arrest depended on MEK-induced
`ERK2 activation.
`In these same experiments,
`the percentage of cells
`with G,-G() DNA and the cell density were assayed during culture.
`The percentage of cells with G,-G() DNA was determined by flow
`cytometry of propidium iodide-stained samples harvested at the indi
`cated times.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket