throbber
Reactive Surfaces Ltd. LLP
`Ex. 1041 (Ray Attachment G)
`Reactive Surfaces Ltd. LLP v. Toyota Motor Corp.
`IPR2016-01914
`
`

`

`CHAPTER XIII
`
`Latent Impressions
`
`
`
`Each ridge of the fingers, palms, and soles bears a row of SWeat
`pores which in the average person constantly exude perspiration. Also,
`the ridges of the fingers and palms are in intermittent contact with
`other parts of the body, such as the hair and face, and with various ob-
`jects, which may leave a film of grease or moisture on the ridges. In
`touching an object, the film of moisture and/or grease may be trans-
`ferred to the object, thus leaving an outline of the ridges of the fingers
`or palm thereon. This print
`is called a latent
`impression,
`the word
`“latent” meaning hidden, that is, the print many times is not readily
`visible.
`
`170
`
`Latent impressions, regardless of the area of the ridges present, are of
`the greatest importance to the criminal investigator as identification of
`them may solve the crime and result in successful prosecution of the
`subject. Consequently, every effort should be made to preserve and
`identifi) them.
`Visible prints in mediums such as blood, grease, dirt, or dust are
`equally important
`to the investigator but, strictly speaking, are not
`latent impressions but rather patent impressions; meaning impressions
`that are exposed, not hidden.
`A search of the crime scene should be conducted in a logical manner.
`Points of entry and exit should be examined, along with surfaces or ob-
`jects disturbed or likely touched during the commission of the crime.
`The specialist should wear a pair of light cloth gloves and handle an
`object only insofar as is necessary and then only by edges or surfaces
`which are not receptive to latent impressions. A record of the exact lo-
`cation of a print on an object and of the object itself should be made,
`since these facts may be of the utmost importance in any trial resulting
`from the investigation. Care should be taken to prevent other individ-
`uals present at the crime scene from handling any object until the fin- '
`gerprint specialist has completed his/her examination for latent prints.
`Portable articles removed should be labeled or marked so that they
`may be readily identified thereafter.
`The beam of a flashlight played over the surface of a non-porous object
`will frequently show the location of latent impressions, although this is
`not an infallible test for their presence.
`Evidence should be examined as soon as feasible after its discovery.
`Following the location of any latent prints at the scene of a crime,
`the prints of all persons whose presence at the place under inspection
`
`

`

`
`
`i?ti
`i}
`
`
`
`
`has been for legitimate purposes should be excluded from further atten-
`
`tion. It is advisable, therefore, during the initial stages of an investiga—
`
`tion where latent prints are found,
`to secure the inked prints of all
`
`members of the household, the employees, and any police or other offi—
`
`cials who may have touched the objects on which the latent impres—
`
`sions were found. Inked prints taken for this purpose are referred to as
`
`elimination prints.
`
`Due to the fragmentary nature of most latent prints, it is not possible
`
`to derive a classification which makes a file search practicable. A latent
`
`impression may be identified, however, by comparison with the prints
`
`of a particular suspect.
`
`impressions
`Inked fingerprints taken for comparison with latent
`
`should be as legible and as complete as possible, including the areas not
`
`essential to classification, since identifications are often made with these
`
`areas. Inked palm prints taken should likewise be complete and clear
`
`and should include impressions of the finger joints. Persons not experi—
`
`enced in latent print comparisons should not attempt to evaluate latent
`
`fragments, since the area necessary for an identification may be ex-
`
`tremely small compared to that of an average inked fingerprint.
`
`Articles which are to be transported by mail or express should be so
`
`packed that the surface bearing latent impressions are not
`in contact
`
`with other surfaces. This may be accomplished by mounting the articles
`
`on a piece of fiber board or plywood. The board should then be se-
`
`cured in a box so that the objects will not touch or be shaken against
`
`the sides in transit. The package should be plainly marked “Evidence,”
`
`to prevent inadvertent handling on opening. Cotton or cloth should
`
`never be placed in direct contact with any surface bearing latent prints.
`
`Any number of paper or cardboard specimens may be placed in a
`
`single protective wrapper, since contact with other surfaces does not
`
`harm latents on such objects. Lifts, negatives and photographs are read-
`
`ily enclosed with letters.
`
`An explanatory letter should accompany all evidence. If it is neces-
`
`sary to pack the evidence separately, a copy of the letter should be
`
`placed in every package so that the recipient will know immediately
`
`the importance of the contents. All items of evidence should be marked
`
`and described exactly in the accompanying letter so that they will not be
`
`confused with packing material of a similar nature, and to provide a
`
`check on what the package should contain.
`
`In addition, the letter should include for record purposes a brief out-
`
`line of the crime, i.e., type, date and place of occurrence, and names of
`
`victims and subjects. If suspects are named for comparison, sufficient
`
`descriptive data should be set out to permit location of their fingerprint
`
`records. This information, in preferential order, comprises the individ»
`
`ual’s complete‘n‘ame, aliases, FBI number, prior arrest number, date of
`
`prior arrest or fingerprinting, fingerprint classification, date and place of
`
`birth, and physical deSCription.
`
`171
`
`
`
`

`

`Evidence is preferably forwarde
`providing records of dispatch and r
`
`d by registered mail 0r any means
`eceipt.
`
`'
`
`

`

`CHAPTER XIV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iz
`
`iia ii
`
`Powdering and Lifting
`Latent Impressions
`
`
`
`The sole purpose in “developing” a latent impression is to make it
`visible so that it may be preserved and compared. Various powders and
`chemicals are used for this purpose. When a latent print (patent print) is
`plainly visible, it should be photographed before any effort is made to
`develop it.
`
`No attempt should be made to brush or apply powder to prints in dust
`or bloody prints, as this will almost surely destroy them. Objects which
`have been wet or immersed in water may still bear identifiable latent
`
`impressions. Before any examination is attempted, however, the object
`must be dried.
`
`Powder brushed lightly over a latent—bearing surface will cling to
`grease or moisture in the ridges of a latent print, making it visible
`against
`the background. Obviously, a powder should be used which
`will contrast with the color of the surface. Photographic contrasts
`shoUld‘also be considered.
`
`A gray powder and a black powder are adequate for latent print
`work. Many fingerprintpowders of various colors and compoSitions are
`aVailable from fingerprint supply houses but none are superior to the
`gray and black.
`
`A very small amount of powder is placed on the brush for applica~
`tio'n’ito the'surface. Once the contour of a print is visible,
`the brush
`strokesshOuld conform to the direction of the ridges. All excess
`powder ShOuld be brushed from between the ridges. Too much powder
`and "tOo little brushing are the chief faults of beginners.
`
`Gray: powder is used on dark—colored surfaces. It is also used on mir-
`rors and metal surfaces which have been polished to a mirror like
`finish, since these surfaces will photograph black with the fingerprint
`camera.
`
`Black powder should be applied'to white or light-colored surfaces.
`
`Aluminum powder affords the same contrast as the gray. Gold and
`red bronze p0wde‘rs, although of a glittering appearance, will photo-
`graph ‘dark and should consequently be used on light—colored surfaces.
`Dragon’s blood powder is a photographically neutral powder and may
`be‘dusted on either a light or dark surface.
`
`173
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`On clear transparent glass, either gray or black powder may be used,
`it being necessary only to use a contrasting black or white background
`when photographing.
`Prints should be lifted after photographing. Both rubber and transpar-
`s purpose. Black or white rubber lifting
`of sizes and has the adhesive surface pro-
`. A black powder print should obviously
`be lifted on white tape and a gray powder print on black tape.
`Gold bronze and red bronze powders should be lifted on white tape,
`aluminum on black. Dragon’s blood may be lifted on either black or
`white.
`
`After cutting a piece of tape sufficiently large to cover the entire
`latent print, the celluloid covering is removed and the adhesive side ap-
`plied to the latent. The tape should be pressed evenly and firmly to the
`face,
`taking care not
`to shift
`its
`'
`i
`‘
`
`174
`
`paper identification tag bearing the initials of the operator, date, and
`object from which lifted should be placed under one corner of the cel-
`luloid, or this information may be written on the back of the lift itself if
`it can be done in a permanent, legible manner.
`If an excessive amount of powder adheres to the latent print, a more
`legible print may sometimes be obtained by lifting a second time (on a
`new piece of tape, of course).
`It should be noted that a print lifted on rubber tape is in a reverse
`position. Consequently, in preparing a photograph of a print on such a
`lift,
`it will be necessary to print the negative from the reverse side in
`order for the print
`to appear in its correct position for comparison.
`Preparation of such photographs should not be attempted by persons of
`inadequate knowledge and experience.
`Transparent tape with a durable adhesive surface is available in l” to
`2” widths for fingerprint work. The common variety of transparent
`tape is not suitable due to the deterioration (drying) of the adhesive sur-
`face. The print on a piece of transparent tape is in correct position.
`Transparent lifts should be affixed to a smooth, grainless, opaque back-
`ground of a black or white color contrasting with the powder used.
`Every effort should be made to avoid air bubbles under such lifts. In no
`instance should a transparent lift ever be folded back on itself or stuck
`to another piece of such tape as a backing, since it is generally not pos-
`sible to determine the correct position of such a print.
`Groups of latent impressions, such as those of adjacent fingers or fin-
`gers and palmswhich appear to have been made simultaneously, should
`be lifted as units, that is, on a single piece of tape, as this may facilitate
`the task of making comparisons.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Following these procedures carefully in taking major case prints can
`ultimately save considerable time and effort in bringing criminals before
`the bar of justice. Time thus saved can be invested in pursuing the solu-
`tion of other major crimes.
`
`
`
`officer recording the
`ho was printed must
`
`prints. The individual
`llX cards: one finger-
`sides, and tips of the
`
`ts can be a key asset
`mparison with latent
`can also be searched
`
`d latent print file. By.
`'ints could lead to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1986 O - 153-914
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket