throbber

`
`The Chemistry of Latent Prints from Children and Ad nits
`
`
`
`
`
`Gary Mong, M.S.1
`
`
`Steven Walter, Ph.D.2
`
`
`Robert Ramotowski, M.S.3
`
`Tony Cantu, Ph.D.3
`
`Introduction
`
`There are numerous literature sources that detail the composition of sweat. These studies typically used
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`solvents or absorbent papers/materials to extract sweat samples directly from the skin surface of volunteers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`However, these methods may extract different chemical compounds than those that would be deposited by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deals in these studies on contained the informatiIn addition, brief contact with a surface (e.g., a latent print).
`
`
`
`
`from the sweat gland. This is also not very immediately after being excreted with samples that are collected
`
`
`
`
`representative of the fact that most examiners seldom recover fresh prints from the crime scene.
`
`There was a need to not only study the chemical compounds present in a deposited latent print, but also
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`examine how these compounds changed with time. The ultimate goal of obtaining this information was to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`guide future research efforts toward visualizing the more stable compounds ( or even stable breakdown
`
`
`
`
`
`products) that are identified from this work. This would involve possibly developing new visualization
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`methods or modifying existing techniques. Another aspect of this work involved the study of children's
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prints. Recent work done by Dr. Michelle Buchanan at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), in
`latent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cooperation with Mr. Art Bohanan of the Knoxville, TN Police Department, found that children's prints are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`particularly difficult to recover from surfaces [1,2]. This was especially true in cases involving child
`
`
`
`
`
`
`abductions, when attempts to process car seats yielded little success beyond a few days for young children's
`prints.
`
`Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) was recently funded to continue and build upon ORN L's
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`work. PNNL collected and analyzed samples from adults and children and then studied changes that occurred
`
`
`
`
`
`over time. The Savannah River Technical Center (SRTC) also conducted research in this area. The latter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`work focused on examining the breakdown products of lipid oxidation, and in particular, the formation of
`hydroperoxides.
`
`
`
`
`
`Work Performed by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
`
`
`
`The group at PNNL collected and analyzed samples from approximately eighty-five subjects ranging
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in age from a young child to a middle-aged adult. The preliminary results indicate that not only do young
`
`
`
`
`
`children leave considerably less residue on a surface (in some cases as little as 1/20 that of adults), the lipid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`portion of their prints is composed primarily of cholesterol, cholesterol esters, and fatty acids. Most of these
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compounds breakdown relatively rapidly, except for the saturated fatty acids (e.g., stearic, palmitic).
`
`
`
`
`Unfortunately, these saturated compounds are not very chemically reactive.
`
`Latent prints were collected from volunteers by having them place sebaceous prints on GFA glass fiber
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`filter papers (Van Waters and Rogers, 4.25 cm circles). With adult samples, extractions were done soon after
`
`
`
`
`
`deposition (as reasonable as possible), and then after 10, 30 and 60 days. With children's prints, extractions
`
`1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Savannah River Technical Center, Aiken, SC.
`
`
`3 United States Secret Service, Forensic Services Division, Washington, DC.
`
`4
`
`Volume 37 No. 2
`Reactive Surfaces Ltd. LLP
`Ex. 1022
` Surfaces Ltd. LLP v. Toyota Motor Corp.
`Reactive
`IPR2016-01914
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
` @fifii'if” 4‘ '
`
`Lipid Cumposru‘un of Samples from Children
`Freshly Depnslled Prints
`
`Lipid Cumpnsiliun ul Samples from Adults
`Freshly Deposited Prints
`
`-uai-Ii
`.mMnnl
`—r= Hi
`
`‘3
`
`1:!
`
`-
`
`Fininril
`
`Ac
`
`an
`
`m
`
`Parunl
`
`m- am". mu Wm Wags... (WWW
`
`agilIéil ‘lil“mfil
`W
`
`Hi
`
`onmuwaaemr
`imri Commoneni
`
`Lnolerotel
`
`Wu amps...“
`
`Figure I: The lipid composition (by weight percent) ot‘prints deposited by children (left) and from adults
`(right).
`
`were done only after deposition and then after 30 days. The extraction solvent was chloroform. Samples were
`dcrivitized using diazomcthanc.
`
`Figure I shows a comparison of recently deposited latent prints from 10 adults and 3 children (aged lO-l 2). The
`most noticeable differences occur with wax esters and cholesterol. The anomaly that occurs with the cholesterol
`peak with children was caused by a group of four females whose prints contained approximately 85-90%
`cholesterol. Due to limitations placed on the use of human subjects as volunteers for this study, the individuals
`could not be re-sampled to verify the observed results. Although children have significantly more cholesterol
`than adults, the average amounts are typically less than ten percent. PNNL is in the process of preparing their
`final report, which will contain detailed information relating to the aging studies.
`
`PNNL also performed a squalene aging study. They found that approximately 40% of the squalene residue
`had been converted to other materials within a twenty—day period. Chromatographic peaks were observed before
`and after the parent squalene peak, indicating that products of lower and higher molecular weight were being
`formed. A similar test was performed with oleic acid. After approximately seventeen days, the oleic acid peak
`was virtually gone. The two primary breakdown products were found to be nonanedioic acid and 9—epoxy oleic
`acid.
`
`Work Performed by the Savannah River Technical Center (SRTC)
`
`The experiments being done at the SRTC involved directly analyzing compounds present in a latent print
`{e.g., squalene) and characterizing their breakdown products. A series of standard lipids representative of the
`various lipid classes found in latent prints were used. These compounds included triglycerides, fatty acids, wax
`esters, cholesterol, cholesterol esters, and a sensitizer (protoporphyrin 1X dimethyl ester, 0.01% of the overall
`mixture). The sensitizer was added to catalyze the reaction between triplet oxygen and light to form singlet
`oxygen (a highly reactive species). A 100 Mg amount of this mixture was placed onto a glass slide and aged in
`various conditions (e.g., light/no light, and/or indoors/outdoors).
`
`The oxidation of unsaturated lipids is accelerated by metals, light, heat, and by several initiators and can
`operate through autoxidation or photo—oxidation pathways [3]. The primary autoxidation products are allylic
`hydroperoxidcs. The double bonds present in unsaturated compounds typically remain, but may change position
`and/or configuration. Hydroperoxides may also undergo further changes.
`In some cases, volatile compounds of
`lower molecular weight are formed (e.g., aldehydes) which often cause the familiar odors associated with lipid
`breakdown. However, this is not the dominant process. For example, the thermal decomposition of linoleate
`hydroperoxide at 210°C gives 82% ofthe dimer product and only 4—5% volatile organic compounds. Another
`possibility involves the formation of rearrangement products (with the same chain length) and products of
`further oxidation or of reaction with solvent (or other compounds present). The final pathway involves the
`formation of products of higher molecular weight (e.g., dimers, poiymers). Photo—oxygenation involves
`
`2
`
`5
`
`fair-1999
`.
`
`
`_. Volume 371%. 2
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`interaction between a double bond and the highly reactive species singlet oxygen (produced from ordinary triplet
`oxygen by light in the presence of sensitizers, like chlorophyll, erythrosine, rose bengal, methylene blue, etc.)
`
`The SRTC proposed measuring the amount of hydroperoxides present by chemiluminescence.
`Chemiluminescence is produced by the reaction of hydroperoxides and luminol in the presence of cytochrome c.
`Luminescence levels will be measured by adapting a published chemiluminescence assay (using an integrating
`CCD camera) [4].
`
`The SRTC (like PNNL) found that unsaturated compounds are depleted rapidly from a latent print deposit,
`even in cool, dark storage conditions. Oxidation, not evaporation, was the primary reason that these unsaturated
`compounds were not detected. Some loss of saturated fatty acids was observed. Samples on glass slides that
`were subjected to outdoor conditions (e.g., rain) lost most of the lipids in the mixtures (with the exception of wax
`esters). Aged lipid samples (approximately five months) formed some polymeric material that adhered to the
`slides. Unlike the original mixture, this material was not soluble in warm diethyl ether.
`
`Squalene appears to be the most reactive of the lipids. Squalene exposed to air will begin to oxidize relatively
`quickly and eventually form a waxy solid. One experiment indicated that 98% of a thin film of squalene was lost
`after a four hour exposure to sunlight (a similar loss required four days of exposure to normal room lighting
`conditions). An experiment done in which the UV component of sunlight was filtered from the squalene resulted
`in 57% of the deposit surviving four hours of exposure. Squalene oxidized with ultraviolet radiation (and thus
`forming 1O2) is known to form volatile compounds like acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, acetone, malonaldehyde, and
`6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one [5]. As with other lipids, oxidation is the primary mechanism responsible for squalene’s
`disappearance. When a nitrogen atmosphere is used, 65% of squalene remained after a four hour exposure to
`sunlight.
`
`Using another recently published chemiluminesce assay method [6], the SRTC was able to quantify the
`amount of hydroperoxides present in a sample of squalene that had been exposed to a month of direct sunlight.
`The sample was found to have about 0.07r moles of hydroperoxide per mole of squalene. Subsequent testing
`indicates that the hydroperoxide concentration peaks within about two days after exposure to direct sunlight.
`Another experiment found that after one month of exposure, 10% of the squalene residue was composed of
`hydroperoxidcs. In future experiments, additional lipids will be analyzed as well as sebum from latent prints.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The SRTC data has helped to better understand some of the results observed in the PNNL experiments. The
`results obtained from both projects will provide a better understanding of latent print chemistry involving both
`children and adults. In addition, it is hoped that the aging study data will help direct future research efforts by
`identifying stable compounds that may eventually be visualized physically, chemically, or optically.
`
`References
`
`[1] Bohanan, A. “Latents from Pre-pubescent Children Versus Latents from Adults," Journal ofForensic Identification, V.
`48, No. 5, 1998, pp. 570-573.
`[2] Buchanan, M.V.; Asano, K.; and Bohanan, A. “Chemical Characterization of Fingerprints from Adults and Children,"
`SPIE Proceedings: Forensic Evidence Analysis and Crime Scene Investigation, V. 2941, 1996, pp. 89-95.
`[3] Gunstone, FD. Fatty Acid and Lipid Chemistry. Chapman & Hall: London, I996.
`[4] Miyazawa, T.; Fujimoto, K.; and Kaneda, T. “Detection of Picomole Levels in Lipid Hydroperoxides by a
`Chemiluminescence Assay,” Agric. Biol. Chem, V. 51, 1987, p. 2569.
`[5] Yeo, H.C.H. and Shibamoto, T. “Formation ofFormaldehyde and Molonaldehyde by Photo-oxidation of Squalene,”
`Lipids, V. 27, No. 1, 1992, p. 50.
`[6] Pinchuk, 1., Schnitzer, E.; and Lichtenberg, D. “Kinetic Analysis of Copper-induced Peroxidation of LDL,” Biochimicu
`et Biophysica Acta, V. 1389, No. 2, 1998, pp. 155-172.
`
`3
`
`armej? No. 2
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket