throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BRADIUM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01897
`Patent No. 9,253,239 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR
`AUTHORIZATION TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY
`
`
`

`

`PTAB Case No.: IPR2016-01897, Patent No. 9,253,239
`Motion to Withdraw Motion for Additional Discovery
`Pursuant to the Board’s authorization given via e-mail with the parties on
`
`
`
`August 15, 2017, Petitioner Microsoft Corporation respectfully requests that its
`
`Motion for Authorization to Take Additional Discovery filed on July 14, 2017
`
`(Paper 23) be withdrawn. The additional discovery for which Petitioner sought
`
`authorization is no longer needed in view of Patent Owner’s Response and
`
`evidence submitted therewith, and Patent Owner’s further agreement that it will
`
`not challenge the prior art status of U.S. Patent No. 6,728,960 to Loomans or
`
`otherwise rely on any declaration of either Mr. Isaac Levanon or Mr. Yonatan Lavi
`
`in this proceeding. See attached Exhibit A.
`
`As indicated in the electronic correspondence with the Board on August 14,
`
`2017, Patent Owner does not oppose this motion.
`
`Dated: August 15, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Patrick J. McKeever/
`Back-up Counsel
`Patrick J. McKeever, Reg. No. 66,019
`
`Lead Counsel
`Chun M. Ng, Reg. No. 36,878
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Matthew C. Bernstein, Pro Hac Vice
`Vinay P. Sathe, Reg. No. 55,595
`Evan S. Day, Reg. No. 75,992
`
`Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`PTAB Case No.: IPR2016-01897, Patent No. 9,253,239
`Motion for Additional Discovery Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.52
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION
`
`TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY has been served in its entirety this 15th
`
`day of August, 2017, by electronic mail on Patent Owner via its attorneys of
`
`record:
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Christopher J. Coulson
`ccoulson@kenyon.com
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON, LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`
`Bradiumiprservice@kenyon.com
`
`
`Dated: August 15, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
`
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Michael N. Zachary
`mzachary@kenyon.com
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON, LLP
`1801 Page Mill Road, Ste 210
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Clifford Ulrich
`culrich@kenyon.com
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON, LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Patrick J. McKeever/
`Back-up Counsel
`Patrick J. McKeever, Reg. No. 66,019
`
`Lead Counsel
`Chun M. Ng, Reg. No. 36,878
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Matthew C. Bernstein, Pro Hac Vice
`Vinay P. Sathe, Reg. No. 55,595
`Evan S. Day, Reg. No. 75,992
`
`Attorneys for Microsoft Corporation
`
`1
`
`

`

`Zachary, Michael
`Bernstein, Matthew C. (SDO)
`Day, Evan S. (SDO); Coulson, Chris
`RE: Bradium "239 IPR
`Friday, August 11, 2017 11:11:26 AM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Matt,
`
`We are okay with this (i.e., confirmed): Bradium will not take the position that Loomans is not prior art?
`Can you also please confirm that Bradium will not otherwise rely on any Lavi or Levanon declaration in
`the 239 IPR proceeding
`
`Thanks.
`
`Michael
`
`From: Bernstein, Matthew C. (Perkins Coie) [MBernstein@perkinscoie.com]
`Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 9:06 AM
`To: Zachary, Michael
`Cc: Day, Evan S. (Perkins Coie); Coulson, Chris
`Subject: RE: Bradium '239 IPR
`
`Michael,

`Microsoft is considering the below request. 

`One issue has come up.  Microsoft is concerned that Bradium may attempt to argue at the oral
`hearing or elsewhere that Loomans is not prior art because of prior invention by Lavi and Levanon,
`and Bradium may attempt to use the declaration purportedly signed by both Lavi and Levanon
`during prosecution to support this.  While Microsoft believes Bradium waived this argument by not
`addressing it in its Patent Owner Response, Bradium’s Patent Owner Response does contain the
`statement that “Patent Owner maintains its position that Loomans is not prior art.” 

`Can you please confirm that for purposes of the 239 IPR proceeding, Bradium will not take the
`position that Loomans is not prior art?  Can you also please confirm that Bradium will not otherwise
`rely on any Lavi or Levanon declaration in the 239 IPR proceeding?  Assuming you confirm these
`things, Microsoft will withdraw the motion to depose Lavi.

`If you could let us know this morning, that would be great, as our client is traveling today.

`Best,
`Matt

`Matthew Bernstein | Perkins Coie LLP
`SAN DIEGO MANAGING PARTNER
`TAIPEI CO-MANAGING PARTNER
`11988 El Camino Real Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`D. 1.858.720.5721
`M. 1.619.254.3273
`F. 1.858.720.5821
`E. MBernstein@perkinscoie.com

`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`From: Zachary, Michael [mailto:MZachary@andrewskurthkenyon.com]
`Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:01 PM
`To: Bernstein, Matthew C. (SDO)
`Cc: Day, Evan S. (SDO); Coulson, Chris
`Subject: Bradium '239 IPR

`Matt,

`Since it is clear from Bradium’s Patent Owner response filed in connection with the above IPR that
`Bradium does not rely on either Mr. Levanon’s testimony or on any evidence of secondary
`considerations, we believe that Microsoft’s motion seeking approval to take the deposition
`testimony of Mr. Lavi in connection with the IPR is pointless.  Please let us know if Microsoft will
`agree to withdraw the motion.  Since Bradium’s response to the motion is due on Monday, we
`would appreciate hearing from you by tomorrow in order to avoid needless motion practice.

`Regards,

`Michael

`Michael N. Zachary
`Partner

`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210 | Palo Alto, CA 94304
`+1.650.384.4683 Phone | +1.650.384.4701 Fax
`+1.650.384.4644 Assistant - Barbara Vance
`mzachary@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`email | vCard | Bio | andrewskurthkenyon.com | Twitter

`
`Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments to it may be legally
`privileged and include confidential information intended only for the recipient(s) identified above. If you
`are not one of those intended recipients, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
`copying of this email or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
`please notify the sender of that fact by return email and permanently delete the email and any
`attachments to it immediately. Please do not retain, copy or use this email or its attachments for any
`purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its contents to any other person. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`operates as a Texas limited liability partnership. Andrews Kurth Kenyon DMCC is registered and licensed
`as a Free Zone company under the rules and regulations of DMCCA. Andrews Kurth Kenyon (UK) LLP is
`authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales (SRA Registration
`No.598542). Thank you.
`
`NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the
`sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
`
`Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments to it may be legally
`privileged and include confidential information intended only for the recipient(s) identified above. If you
`are not one of those intended recipients, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`copying of this email or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
`please notify the sender of that fact by return email and permanently delete the email and any
`attachments to it immediately. Please do not retain, copy or use this email or its attachments for any
`purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its contents to any other person. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`operates as a Texas limited liability partnership. Andrews Kurth Kenyon DMCC is registered and licensed
`as a Free Zone company under the rules and regulations of DMCCA. Andrews Kurth Kenyon (UK) LLP is
`authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales (SRA Registration
`No.598542). Thank you.
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket