IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In Re Continuation of U.S. Patent Application
`11/078,778, Filed: 3/11/05
`
`Group No.: Not yet assigned
`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`
`Conf. No.: Not yet assigned
`
`Serial No.:
`
`Filed Herewith
`
`Examiner: Not yet assigned
`
`Filed:
`
`Herewith
`
`For:
`
`ANALOG DATA GENERATING
`AND PROCESSING DEVICE
`FOR USE WITH A PERSONAL
`COMPUTER (As Amended
`Herein)
`
`Attorney
`Docket No.:
`
`0757/97866
`
`PRELIMINARY AMENDMENT
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-0001
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`A continuation patent application is being filed contemporaneously herewith. Please
`
`enter this preliminary amendment prior to examination of the continuation application.
`
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG.
`Petitioner - Apple, Inc.
`Patent Owner - Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG.
`IPR2016-01863
`EXH. 2003
`
`1
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-2-
`
`IN THE TITLE:
`
`Please amend the title to read as follows:
`
`ANALOG DAT A GENERA TING AND PROCESSING DEVICE FOR USE WITH A
`
`PERSONAL COMPUTER.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-3 -
`
`IN THE CLAIMS:
`
`Please cancel claims 1-16 without prejudice, and add new claims 17-39 as noted
`
`hereinafter:
`
`1-16.
`
`( cancelled).
`
`17.
`
`(new) An analog data generating and processing device (ADGPD), comprising:
`
`a processor and a memory;
`
`one or more transducers that are operatively coupled to the processor and the
`
`memory;
`
`a first set of instructions stored in the memory that can be executed at one or more
`
`user selected times, each execution of the first instruction set causing the one or more transducers
`
`to generate an analog data set that is representative of one or more analog wave signals that are
`
`generated or reflected by a source that is external to and not in substantial proximity to the
`
`ADGPD;
`
`an analog to digital converter that is operatively coupled to the one or more
`
`transducers, the processor and the memory so that, each time the first instruction set is executed,
`
`a digitized analog data set is generated from the analog data set that is generated when the first
`
`instruction set is executed;
`
`wherein one or more digitized analog data sets are stored in the data storage
`
`location of the memory;
`
`an 1/0 port that is operatively coupled to the processor and the memory, the I/0
`
`port being adapted to receive device identification signals, data identification signals, and data
`
`3
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-4-
`
`transfer signals that are sent from a multi-purpose user interface (MPUI) of a personal computer
`
`(PC), the PC periodically sending the device identification signals to its MPUI;
`
`a second set of instructions stored in the memory that are to be executed after the
`
`I/0 port has received and the processor has processed one or more device identification signals
`
`to cause a response signal to be automatically and without user intervention sent to the I/0 port
`
`to allow a PC to automatically and without user intervention recognize that it can communicate
`
`with the ADGPD as if the ADGPD were a commercially available mass storage device even
`
`though the ADGPD is not a commercially available mass storage device;
`
`a third set of instructions stored in the memory that are to be executed after the
`
`I/0 port has received and after the processor has received and processed a data identification
`
`signal to cause identification information to be automatically and without user intervention sent
`
`through the I/0 port to allow a PC to create a visual representation of the data storage location of
`
`the memory on a display; and
`
`a fourth set of instructions stored in the memory that are to be executed after the
`
`I/0 port has received and after the processor has received and processed a data transfer signal to
`
`cause user selected ones of the digitized analog data sets to be transferred from the data storage
`
`location of the memory through the I/0 port by means of a driver that is a component of an
`
`operating system of a PC when the operating system is initially installed in the PC.
`
`18.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 17, wherein each analog wave signal comprises
`
`electromagnetic radiation.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page- 5-
`
`19.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 18, wherein the electromagnetic radiation is
`
`representative of an object that is physically separated from and can be located not in substantial
`
`proximity to the ADGPD.
`
`20.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the electromagnetic radiation is
`
`generated by a diagnostic radiological system.
`
`21.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the commercially available mass
`
`storage device comprises a hard disk drive.
`
`22.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein receipt and processing of the response
`
`signal by a PC allows it to communicate with the ADGPD as if it were a hard disk drive even
`
`though it is not a hard disk drive.
`
`23.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the I/0 port comprises a SCSI interface.
`
`24.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the processor comprises a digital signal
`
`processor.
`
`25.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the identification information comprises
`
`at least the number of different digitized analog data sets that are stored in the data storage
`
`location.
`
`26.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 25, wherein the identification information further
`
`comprises a root directory that can be accessed by a PC.
`
`27.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 26, wherein the identification information further
`
`comprises a configuration file.
`
`28.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the 1/0 port is to be operatively
`
`coupled to an MPUI by a wire-based connection.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-6-
`
`29.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein each digitized analog data sets is stored
`
`as an individual file in the memory of the ADGPD.
`
`30.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 29, wherein the individual files form a part of a file
`
`system.
`
`31.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the digitized analog data sets are
`
`generated and stored in the memory independent of when the I/0 port is operatively coupled to
`
`anMPUI.
`
`32.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the digitized analog data sets are
`
`generated and stored in the memory both before and after the time when the I/0 port is
`
`operatively coupled to an MPUI.
`
`33.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 32, wherein the digitized analog data sets are
`
`generated and stored in the memory only after the time when the I/0 port is operatively coupled
`
`to anMPUI.
`
`34.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the ADGPD comprises two or more
`
`transducers.
`
`35.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the ADGPD further comprises a
`
`connecting device that electrically connects the one or more transducers to the analog to digital
`
`converter.
`
`36.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the connecting device detachably
`
`couples the one or more transducers to the analog to digital converter.
`
`37.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the one or more transducers are
`
`arranged to receive data from the processor and the memory.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-7-
`
`38.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the one or more transducers are capable
`
`of communicating directly with a PC.
`
`39.
`
`(new) The ADGPD of claim 19, wherein the one or more transducers are
`
`separate from the analog to digital converter.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-8-
`
`REMARKS
`
`Claims 1-16 have been cancelled without prejudice as to the subject matter claimed
`
`therein. New claims 17-39 are being submitted herewith for the Examiner's consideration.
`
`The Examiner's attention is drawn to the fact that the new claims presented herein are
`
`similar in scope in material respects to the claims of parent application Ser. No. 11/078,778,
`
`which the Examiner found to be patentable. The issue fee for the parent application recently was
`
`paid. For this reason, for example, the undersigned attorney believes and submits that the
`
`currently pending claims should be found to be patentable over all of the prior art that was
`
`considered in connection with the parent application.
`
`To expedite the prosecution of this application, and while it may not be necessary to do
`
`so, a terminal disclaimer over the parent application (Ser. No. 11/078,778) is being submitted
`
`herewith to eliminate the possibility of an obviousness type double patenting rejection being
`
`made in the future once the parent application issues as a patent. The Examiner's acceptance of
`
`the terminal disclaimer is earnestly solicited.
`
`An Information Disclosure statement is being filed herewith for the Examiner's
`
`consideration so that all of the prior art considered in connection with the parent application will
`
`be listed on the cover page of any patent that is granted on the instant application. The Examiner
`
`is respectfully requested to review all of the references submitted with the IDS, including the
`
`nine references discussed hereinafter. Portions of each reference that one may argue allegedly
`
`are relevant to the subject matter of the currently pending claims, together with an identification
`
`of each reference, are presented hereinafter:
`
`1)
`
`US Patent No. 5,915,106, which is entitled "Method And System For
`
`8
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-9-
`
`Operating A Scanner Which Emulates A Disk Drive," is not prior art to any of the
`
`claims submitted herewith. The earliest US filing date of this patent (March 20,
`
`1997) is sixteen days after the earliest effective filing date of the currently
`
`pending claims, which is the March 4, 1997 filing date of German application no.
`
`197 08 755. The Examiner's confirmation of this is earnestly solicited.
`
`2)
`
`US Patent No. 5,508,821 is entitled "Image Scanner And Image Forming
`
`Apparatus With An Interface For Connection With An External Computer."
`
`Column 4, lines 21-23 of this patent state that the "image scanner 20 emulates the
`
`file system of 'UNIX' as if it were a hard disc. Accordingly, the image scanner 20
`
`looks like the hard disc from the workstation 21 can be handled as a hard disk."
`
`In the summary of the invention of this patent, it is stated that an "object" of the
`
`invention is to provide an "image scanner" that "requires no preparation of any
`
`new device driver."
`
`3)
`
`US Patent No. 5,844,961 is entitled "Filmless Digital X-Ray System." Figure 4
`
`of the patent shows an "electronics package 480" that is a part of a "digital
`
`cassette." Column 10, lines 4-9 of the patent state that the "electronics package
`
`480 defines an area that will allow for an electronic system being included in the
`
`digital cassette 200. The electronics system will be able to process the
`
`information captured by the imaging array system 450 and communicate that
`
`information to the computer 220." Column 11, line 10 through column 13, line
`
`12 disclose "digital cassette and the computer communications."
`
`4)
`
`US Patent No. 5,131,089 is entitled "Solid State disk Drive Emulation."
`
`9
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page- IO-
`
`The abstract of this patent states that the "system permits software written for use
`
`with floppy disks to be used with solid state memory devices such as RAM cards
`
`or ROM without modification of the software."
`
`5)
`
`6)
`
`US Patent No. 4,642,759 is entitled "Bubble Memory Disk Emulation."
`
`A two page printout of text included with Windows 95 is submitted
`
`herewith concerning the "RAMDRIVE.SYS" command. This document states
`
`that this command allows a computer's RAM memory to simulate a hard disk
`
`drive.
`
`7)
`
`Figure 1 of US Patent No. 5,724,574 discloses a hardware arrangement that
`
`includes, for example, a high speed scanner 24, a local area network 10, an optical
`
`disk based document server 15, and a number of workstations 18.
`
`8)
`
`An article entitled "Optical Server Uses Network Protocol For Plug-And-
`
`Play Integration" was published in 1993. Page two of this article states that
`
`"emulation of the magnetic file system with a WORM-specific file system in this
`
`manner has several distinct advantages. The principal advantage is that the
`
`WORM disk appears to applications and utilities as just another disk."
`
`9)
`
`The manual for Polaroid's Digital Camera model no. PDC-2000 indicates
`
`that it was published in 1996. The Examiner is asked to assume, for the sake of
`
`argument, that this is the case. Applicant reserves the right to challenge this in all
`
`forums and proceedings other than the examination of this application.
`
`Page 11 of the manual states that the "PDC-2000 camera is a Small
`
`Computer Systems Interface (SCSI) device," that one can "connect up to seven
`
`10
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page- 11 -
`
`SCSI devices to your computer," and that the "PDC-2000 camera's SCSI ID is
`
`preset to 4 at the factor."
`
`Page 83 of the manual states that to "transfer and work with pictures from
`
`the PDC-2000 camera on your PC, you use the PDC-2000 TWAIN driver ... " or
`
`one can install "PDC-2000 Direct" software.
`
`The currently pending claims clearly are supported by the specification as originally
`
`filed. As one example, all of the currently pending claims generally require that a digitized
`
`analog data set be representative of one or more analog wave signals (e.g., electromagnetic
`
`radiation) that are generated or reflected by a source that is external to and not located in
`
`substantial proximity to the analog data generating and processing device (ADGPD). These
`
`claim features are supported, for example, by the "diagnostic radiology system" disclosed at
`
`paragraph 5 of the specification of the instant application.
`
`An example of such a "diagnostic radiology system" is, for example, an x-ray machine,
`
`the x-rays being one example of the claimed "analog wave signals." As readily apparent to one
`
`of ordinary skill in the relevant art, typical x-ray machines include two housings one in which
`
`an x-ray generator is mounted and a second one in which an x-ray transducer is mounted. The x-
`
`ray generator is physically separated from and not located in substantial proximity to the
`
`transducer so that, for example, a patient can position his or her leg between the generator and
`
`the transducer. The transducer creates a set of analog data that comprises an x-ray so that, for
`
`example, a user can determine whether the patient's leg is broken.
`
`It should be noted that the scope of the currently pending claims is not limited to
`
`"diagnostic radiology systems" and or to systems that only produce "x-rays." In this regard,
`
`11
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-12-
`
`other "modes" of practicing the claimed invention include, for example, the CCD device of a still
`
`camera that is exposed to ambient light with or without a flash, and that creates therefrom an
`
`analog data set that is representative of a picture.
`
`For the Examiner's information, the inclusion of the above-described subject matter in the
`
`currently pending claims is one reason that the Examiner should find the new claims submitted
`
`herewith patentable over, for example, the prior art of record that discloses the use of document
`
`scanners (e.g., US Patent Nos. 5,508,821, 5,532,825 and 5,724,574). In contrast to the currently
`
`pending claims, the scanner references teach a light source that is located inside the scanner and
`
`that is located in substantial proximity to the CCD of the scanner. Such sensors are not adapted
`
`to process electromagnetic radiation that is not in substantial proximity to the scanner housing.
`
`For this reason alone, the currently pending claims should be found to be patentable over the
`
`scanner references.
`
`A still further aspect of the currently pending claims that is fully supported by the
`
`originally filed specification follows. All of the claims presented in this preliminary amendment
`
`generally require that the ADGPD send a response signal that allows a PC to automatically and
`
`without user intervention recognize that it can communicate with the ADGPD as if it were a
`
`commercially available mass storage device even though it is not a commercially available mass
`
`storage device. See, for example, paragraph 54 of the specification submitted herewith, which
`
`states that the use of the present invention includes "simulating a virtual mass storage device."
`
`The word "virtual" in this context refers, for example, to the fact that a personal computer is led
`
`to believe that it is communicating with a commercially available mass storage device when, in
`
`actuality, it is communicating with an analog data generating and processing device. See also,
`
`12
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page-13-
`
`for example, paragraph 23 of the specification, which recites:
`
`"The digital signal processor 13 receives this inquiry instruction via the
`
`first connecting device and generates a signal which is sent to the host device (not
`
`shown) again via the first connecting device 12 and the host line 11. This signal
`
`indicates to the host device that, for example, a hard disk drive is attached at the
`
`interface to which the INQUIRY instruction was sent."
`
`It is respectfully submitted that no prior art reference of record, either taken alone or in a
`
`purported combination, teaches or suggests the combinations claimed in the currently pending
`
`claims for a number of different reasons. As one example, US Patent No. 5,508,821 does not
`
`teach or suggest, for example, the above-noted "automatic recognition" feature because, for
`
`example, the system disclosed therein is UNIX based. As readily apparent to one of ordinary
`
`skill in the relevant art, such UNIX based systems affirmatively require user intervention in order
`
`to operate and use the scanner disclosed in the '821 patent.
`
`As a further example of the patentability of the currently pending claims, the camera
`
`disclosed in the Polaroid manual submitted (assuming, for argument's sake, that it is prior art)
`
`cannot be automatically recognized without human intervention. In this regard, user intervention
`
`always is required because, for example, a user needs to make sure that the camera's SCSI
`
`identification number does not conflict with the ID number of any other device in a daisy chain
`
`of which the camera forms a part. For this reason alone, for example, the currently pending
`
`claims should be found to be patentable over the Polaroid camera manual (assuming, for
`
`argument's sake, that it is prior art).
`
`It is respectfully submitted that the new claims are in condition for allowance and,
`
`13
`
`

`

`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: Not yet assigned
`Filed: Herewith
`Date: August 24, 2006
`Page 14-
`
`therefore, a formal notice to that effect is earnestly solicited. In this regard, the Examiner is
`
`respectfully requested to contact the undersigned attorney upon entry of this amendment.
`lly submitte~ /J
`tu .~
`e ey
`. Salmon
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 37,435
`
`Respect
`
`August 24, 2006
`Welsh & Katz, Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone (312) 655-1500
`Facsimile (312) 655-1501
`
`14
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In Re Continuation of U.S. Patent Application
`11/078,778, Filed: 3/11/05
`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`
`Group No.: Unknown
`
`Conf. No.: Unknown
`
`Serial No.:
`
`Filed Herewith
`
`Examiner: Not Yet Assigned
`
`Filed:
`
`Herewith
`
`For:
`
`ANALOG DATA GENERATING
`AND PROCESSING DEVICE
`FOR USE WITH A PERSONAL
`COMPUTER (As Amended
`Herein)
`
`Attorney
`Docket No.: 0757/97866
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`Box IDS- NON FEE
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §1.97, a list of documents is disclosed on the attached Form PT0-
`1449 that may be material to the examination of this application. Listed Documents are U.S.
`patents, foreign patents and/or published papers. Copies of all references were submitted with
`the parent application and, therefore, are not being filed herewith.
`
`It is submitted that no fees are due in connection with this Information Disclosure
`Statement because it is being submitted prior to the issuance of the first Office Action.
`
`Documents for which the supplied date of publication lists the year of publication without
`the month were published sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign
`priority date, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue. Pursuant to §609 of the
`MPEP, it is understood that the month of publication is not required when the particular month
`of publication is not in issue.
`
`No inferences should be drawn that the attached list represents a comprehensive
`investigation, or that any material disclosed is equivalent to the subject invention. In addition,
`
`15
`
`

`

`none of the documents that have publication dates prior to the priority date of the above
`application anticipate the invention in this application.
`
`The cited document(s) disclose numerous specific features. There has been no attempt to
`list each and every feature disclosed by each document. The Examiner is requested to review the
`document(s) and determine the extent of the materiality of the document disclosures with respect
`to the present invention.
`
`The discussion of any art and the citation of any document(s) herein is not to be
`construed as an admission that the art or document disclosure is necessarily within the invention
`field of endeavor, that the art or document disclosure is necessarily prior in time to a particular
`date which may be relevant to the instant patent application, and/or that the art or document
`disclosure is otherwise necessarily prior art as defined by the patent law with respect to the
`instant invention and application.
`
`Also, there is reserved the right to later set forth how the instant invention is
`distinguished over the disclosure of any document or other art, including the disclosures of the
`art and document(s) recited herein, that may be cited by the Examiner in rejecting a claim in the
`instant patent application. The recitation herein of the art and document(s) is not to be construed
`as an assertion that more pertinent art could not possibly be in existence.
`
`Dated: August 24, 2006
`Enclosures:
`Form PT0-1449
`
`WELSH & KATZ, LTD.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22"d Floor
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Telephone:
`(312) 655-1500
`Facsimile:
`(312) 655-1501
`
`16
`
`

`

`Form PT0-1449
`(Rev. 8-88)
`
`U.S. Department of Commerce
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`(Use several sheets if necessary)
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`0757/97866
`Applicant
`
`Serial No.
`Not Yet Assigned
`
`Filing Date
`Herewith
`
`Michael Tasler
`Group No.
`
`3,714,635
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`01/30/1973
`Hamilton, et al.
`
`3,805,245
`
`04/16/1974
`
`Brooks, et al.
`
`3,976,979
`
`08/24/1976
`
`Parkinson, et al.
`
`4,509, 113
`
`04/02/1985
`
`Heath
`
`4,642,759
`
`02/10/1987
`
`Foster
`
`4,680,732
`
`07/14/1987
`
`DiCenzo
`
`4,888,680
`
`12/19/1989
`
`Sander, et al.
`
`4,901,275
`
`02/13/1990
`
`Hardie, et al.
`
`4,972,470
`
`11/20/1990
`
`Farago
`
`5,070,474
`
`12/03/1991
`
`Tuma, et al.
`
`5,088,033
`
`02/11/1992
`
`Binkley, et al.
`
`5, 131,089
`
`07/14/1992
`
`Cole
`
`5,197,128
`
`03/23/1993
`
`Campbell, et al.
`
`5,214,761
`
`05/25/1993
`
`Barrett, et al.
`
`5,291,584
`
`03/01/1994
`
`Challa, et al.
`
`5,296,611
`
`03/22/1994
`
`Solladie, et al.
`
`5,297,124
`
`03/22/1994
`
`Plotkin, et al.
`
`5,379,382
`
`01/03/1995
`
`Work, et al.
`
`5,430,855
`
`07/04/1995
`
`Walsh, et al.
`
`5,444,644
`
`08/22/1995
`
`Divjak
`
`5,487,154
`
`01/23/1996
`
`Gunji
`I Date Considered
`
`Initial if citation considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609; Draw line through
`citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to
`applicant.
`
`Examiner
`
`*Examiner:
`
`17
`
`

`

`Form PT0-1449
`(Rev. 8-88)
`
`U.S. Department of Commerce
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`(Use several sheets if necessary)
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`0757/97866
`Applicant
`
`Filing Date
`Herewith
`
`I Serial No.
`
`Not Yet Assigned
`
`Michael Tasler
`
`I Group No.
`
`5,499,378
`
`03/12/1996
`
`McNeil!, Jr., et al.
`
`5,506,692
`
`04/09/1996
`
`Murata
`
`5,508,821
`
`04/16/1996
`
`Murata
`
`5,510,774
`
`04/23/1996
`
`Phillips
`
`5,524,047
`
`06/04/1996
`
`Brown, et al.
`
`5,528,765
`
`06/18/1996
`
`Milligan
`
`5,532,825
`
`07/02/1996
`
`Lim, et al.
`
`5,548,782
`
`08/20/1996
`
`Michael, et al.
`
`5,548,783
`
`08/20/1996
`
`Jones, et al.
`
`5,581,741
`
`12/03/1996
`
`Clark, et al.
`
`5,724,574
`
`03/03/1998
`
`Stratigos, et al.
`
`5,748,924
`
`05/05/1998
`
`Llorens, et al.
`
`5,765,027
`
`06/09/1998 Wang, eta!.
`
`5,778,205
`
`07/07/1998
`
`Orimoto
`
`5,812,879
`
`09/22/1998
`
`Moro
`
`5,844,961
`
`12/1/98
`
`McEvoy, et al.
`
`5,875,415
`
`02/23/1999
`
`Lieb, et al .
`
`5,884,103
`
`03/16/1999
`
`Terho, et al.
`
`5,915,106
`
`06/22/1999
`
`Ard
`
`5,991,530
`
`11/23/1999
`
`Okada, et al.
`
`6,012,113
`
`01/04/2000
`
`Tuckner
`
`6,081,856
`
`06/27/2000
`
`Comer
`
`6,098, 116
`
`08/01/2000
`
`Nixon, et al.
`
`I Date Considered
`
`Initial if citation considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609; Draw line through
`citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to
`applicant.
`
`Examiner
`
`*Examiner:
`
`18
`
`

`

`Form PT0-1449
`(Rev. 8-88)
`
`U.S. Department of Commerce
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`(Use several sheets if necessary)
`
`Sheet 3 of 5
`
`I Serial No.
`
`Not Yet Assigned
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`0757/97866
`Applicant
`
`Filing Date
`Herewith
`
`Michael Tasler
`
`I Group No.
`
`6,119,180
`
`09/12/2000
`
`Terho, et al.
`
`6,131,125
`
`10/20/2000
`
`Rostoker, et al.
`
`6, 182,145
`
`01/30/2001
`
`Shuman, et al.
`
`6,286,073
`
`09/04/2001
`
`Vegter
`
`6,298,388
`
`10/02/2001
`
`Taguchi
`
`6,470,399
`
`10/22/2002
`
`Tasler
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Document Number
`53145535 A
`
`Date
`12/18/78
`
`Japan
`
`61034652 A
`
`2/18/86
`
`Japan
`
`61060164 A
`
`03/27/86
`
`Japan
`
`01303554 A
`
`07/12/89
`
`Japan
`
`01293404 A
`
`I 1/27/89
`
`Japan
`
`02114351 A
`
`04/26/90
`
`Japan
`
`09016506 A
`
`01/17/97
`
`Japan
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Country
`
`Class
`
`Subclass
`
`Translation
`Yes
`No
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`x
`
`OTHER DOCUMENTS (Including Author, Title, Date, Pertinent Pages, Etc.)
`
`8.
`
`IEEE Standard for a High Performance Serial Bus, 1996. 392 pp. (IEEE Std 1394-1995)
`
`9. Digidesign 882/20 I/0 Audio Interface Installation Guide, 14 pp.
`
`10. Information Technology - Serial Bus Protocol 2 (SBP -2), TIO Project 1155D, Revision 4,
`5/19/98, 107 pp.
`11. An American National Standard, IEEE Standard for a Simple 32-Bit Backplane Bus: NuBus;
`1998, 51 nn. (ANSI/IEEE 1196-1987)
`12. Polaroid Digital Camera PDC-2000 User Guide for Macintosh or Windows applications (142
`oo.)
`13. apple-history.com, Macintosh Quadra 650 (with NuBus Slots), Apple Computer, Inc., (produce
`introduced 10/93) l 1/29/05, 2 pp.
`Date Considered
`
`Initial if citation considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609; Draw line through
`citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to
`applicant.
`
`Examiner
`
`*Examiner:
`
`19
`
`

`

`Form PT0-1449
`(Rev. 8-88)
`
`U.S. Department of Commerce
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`(Use several sheets if necessary)
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`0757/97866
`Applicant
`
`I Serial No.
`Not Yet Assigned
`
`Michael Tasler
`I Group No.
`
`Filing Date
`Herewith
`14. Wang, James www.sims.berkeley.edu Third Party NuBus AV (Audio-Video) Cards, 1993-
`I 996 I ""·
`15. Accredited Standards Committee X3, Information Technolgoy, John Lohmeyer, X3T10/96-
`202rl, Agenda and Results of Meeting, X3T!O SCSI Working Group Meeting, 07/24/96 (6
`nn.)
`16. Intel Corporation, Universal Host Controller Interface Design Guide (UHCI), Revision 1.1,
`March 1996 (47 on.)
`17. Twain Working Group Committee, Twain Toolkit Release VJ .6, Twain Specification Release,
`2/5/96 (367 pp,)
`18. Digidesign Website, www.digidesign.com, Tabular cross-reference "Pro Tools 4.0.1 NuBus
`Systems compatibility" as suooorted by Digidesign, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, 3 no.
`19. Twain Working Group, www.twain.org, About Twain, 4 pp.
`
`20. Pournelle Alex, Jetsend Technology Allows Device connectivity with No Servers, Drivers, or
`Code, ComputerTechnolol!v Review, 07/1999, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, Pg. 22, 4 no.
`21. Business Editors/Technology Writers, Salutation Port-of-Entry Software Lets Application
`Developers Control Network Peripherals from the Windows Desktop, Business Wire,
`07/13/98, Pg. 1 (3 PP.)
`22. Wire Feed, HP Introduces JetSend for Pocket PC JetSend Solutions Now Compatible with
`Complete Range of Microsoft Windows CE- and Pocket PC-based Products, M2 Presswire,
`4/26/2000, P!!. I (3 PP.)
`23. Stedman, John HP and TROY Group Extend JetSend Protocal to Simplify Printing Over
`Networks and the Internet; JetSend Protocal Expands Cutting-edge Capabilities to Non-HP
`Printers, HP Deskjet Printers, Legacy HP LaserJet Printers and Future Products, M2 Presswire,
`2/10/2000, Pg. 1 (2 DD.)
`24. Business Editors, An Industry First, TROY Group's NetSend Makes Up to 9 Million HP
`Legacy Printers Internet-Readv, Business Wire, 11/16/99, Pg. I (3 nn.)
`25. Keele, Richard Designing Control Units that Interface Peripherals to the IBM 1/0 Channel,
`Computer Technolo11v Review, Fall 1988; Vol. 8, Iss. 13, """· 71 (1 page)
`26. Lang, Michael Optical Server Uses Network Protocal for Plug-and Play Integration, Computer
`Techno]o!!V Review, 12/1993, Vol 13, Iss. 15, nil. 85 (3 on.)
`27. Bursky, Dave
`to Ease Clustered System
`Inter-System Communication Standard
`Implementation, Electronic Design, 10/13/97, Vol. 45, Iss. 22, pg. 32 (3 on.)
`28. Hadden, Thomas H., Tape Drive Without Backup Software? Wait No More, Computer
`Technology Review Los Angeles, 10/1995, Vol. 15 Iss. 10, P. 34 (4 PP.)
`29. Ferelli, Mark, 12-inch WORM becomes the key to document image processing Computer
`Technology Review Los Angeles, 3/1994, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, p. 1 (3 Po.)
`30. Nelson, Andy Catching a Direct Bus. InfoWorld, 6/17/96, VO!. 18, Iss. 25, pg. 129 (2 pp.)
`
`Examiner
`
`*Examiner:
`
`31. DeMonker, Judy 120 Moves Into Clustering, Storage Arenas, Info World, 12/9/96, Vol. 18, Iss.
`50, p. 37 (2 DP.)
`I Date Considered
`Initial if citation considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609; Draw line through
`citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to
`applicant.
`
`20
`
`

`

`Form PT0-1449
`(Rev. 8-88)
`
`U.S. Department of Commerce
`Patent and Trademark Office
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`(Use several sheets if necessary)
`
`Attorney Docket No.
`0757197866
`Applicant
`
`Filing Date
`Herewith
`
`Serial No.
`Not Yet Assigned
`
`Michael Tasler
`Group No.
`
`32. Krause, Reinhardt 1/0 Driver Spec to be Unveiled, Electronic News, 1/29/96, Vol. 42, Iss.
`2101, pg. 1 (3 pp.)
`33. Microsoft Windows 95 README for MS-DOS Device Drivers, 08/95, pg. 1 (2 pp.)
`
`34. Lang, Michael Optical server uses network protocols for plug-and-play integration, Computer
`Technolo~ Review: Special Fall Issue, Los Angeles, Dec. 1993, Vol. 13, Iss. 15 p. 85 (6 DD.)
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`Examiner
`
`*Examiner:
`
`I Date Considered
`
`Initial if citation considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609; Draw line through
`citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to
`applicant.
`
`21
`
`