`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG
`
`P.T.A.B. Proceeding Nos. IPR2016-01842, -01863, and -01864
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,470,399; 8,504,746; and 9,189,437
`
`January 16, 2018
`
`
`
`Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
`
`Exhibit 1057
`IPR2016-01863
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds (’437 Patent)
`
`Ground
`
`Claims
`
`Type
`
`Primary
`Reference
`
`Secondary Reference(s)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`1, 4-6, 9-12, 14,
`15, 30, 34
`16
`
`13, 18
`
`32
`
`43
`
`45
`
`IPR2016-01842 (’437 Patent)
`
`§ 103
`
`Pucci
`
`Kepley, Schmidt
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`Pucci
`
`Pucci
`
`Pucci
`
`Pucci
`
`Pucci
`
`Kepley, Schmidt, Shinosky
`
`Kepley, Schmidt, Campbell
`
`Kepley, Schmidt, Wilson
`
`Schmidt
`
`Schmidt, Campbell
`
`’1842 Institution Decision, pp. 37-38
`
`2
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds (’746 Patent)
`
`Ground
`
`Claims
`
`Type
`
`Primary
`Reference
`
`Secondary Reference(s)
`
`IPR2016-01863 (’746 Patent)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`1, 4, 6-8, 10, 11,
`20, 21, 30, 34, 35
`14
`
`23
`
`§ 103
`
`Pucci
`
`Kepley, Schmidt
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`Pucci
`
`Pucci
`
`Shinosky, Kepley, Schmidt
`
`Kepley, Schmidt, Wilson
`
`’1863 Institution Decision, pp. 19-20
`
`3
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds (’399 Patent)
`
`Ground
`
`Claims
`
`Type
`
`Primary
`Reference
`
`Secondary Reference(s)
`
`1, 3, 5, 11, 14
`
`IPR2016-01839 (’399 Patent)
`Schmidt and the “sampling circuit”
`references (Horowitz, Burr-Brown,
`Intersil, MT-090, Oppenheim)
`
`§ 103 Kawaguchi
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1, 3, 11, 14
`
`5
`
`§ 103
`
`Pucci
`
`IPR2016-01864 (’399 Patent)
`Kepley, Schmidt and the “sampling
`circuit” references (Horowitz, Burr-
`Brown, Intersil, MT-090, Oppenheim)
`Kepley, Schmidt, the “sampling
`circuit” references, and Li
`
`§ 103
`
`
`Pucci
`
`’1839 Institution Decision, pp. 6, 28; ’1864 Institution Decision, p. 21
`
`4
`
`
`
`Outline
`
`
`I. Pucci in view of Kepley stores the processed analog data in
`memory as at least one file of digitized analog data.
`
`II. Pucci in view of Schmidt responds to an INQUIRY command
`by emulating a hard drive.
`
`In Pucci, user-loaded file transfer enabling software is not
`required.
`
`III.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Pucci in view of Schmidt responds to
`an INQUIRY command by
`emulating a hard drive
`(all patents)
`
`6
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’437 Patent recites “an automatic recognition
`process.”
`
`’437 Patent, Claim 1
`
`7
`
`
`
`Claim 43 of the ’437 Patent recites “automatically generating and
`transmitting . . . an identification parameter.”
`
`’437 Patent, Claim 43
`
`8
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’746 Patent “automatically causes at least one parameter
`indicative of the class of devices to be sent to the computer.”
`
`’746 Patent, Claim 1
`
`9
`
`
`
`Claim 34 of the ’746 Patent recites “automatically sending . . . at least
`one parameter . . . Identifying the analog data acquisition device as a
`digital device.”
`
`’746 Patent, Claim 34
`
`10
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’399 Patent recites an inquired device that “signals to the
`host device that it is an input/output device customary in a host device.”
`
`’399 Patent, Claim 1
`
`11
`
`
`
`Claim 11 of the ’399 Patent recites an inquired device that “signals to
`the host device that it is an input/output device customary in a host
`device.”
`
`’399 Patent, Claim 11
`
`12
`
`
`
`For the “automatic recognition process,” the Petitions rely on Pucci in
`view of Schmidt.
`
`The Petition:
`
`’1863 Petition, pp. 14-15; ’1842 Petition, p. 12; ’1864 Petition, p. 14
`
`13
`
`
`
`In Pucci, the ION node emulates a conventional disk drive.
`
`Pucci, p. 220; ’1842 Petition, p. 12; ’1863 Petition, p. 14; ’1864 Petition, p. 14
`
`14
`
`
`
`In Pucci, the ION node emulates a conventional disk drive.
`
`Pucci, pp. 220-21; ’1842 Petition, p. 36; ’1863 Petition, pp. 37, 38; ’1864 Petition, pp. 12, 14
`
`15
`
`
`
`When emulating a conventional disk drive, Pucci uses the “common”
`SCSI standard.
`
`Pucci, pp. 220-21; ’1842 Petition, pp. 12, 27-28; ’1863 Petition, pp. 15, 19, 38; ’1864 Petition, pp. 15, 33-34
`
`16
`
`
`
`Using the SCSI standard, Pucci’s host would send an INQUIRY to
`request information from its peripheral (i.e., the ION node).
`
`Schmidt, p. 88; ’1842 Petition, p. 30; ’1863 Petition, p. 15; ’1864 Petition, p. 15
`
`17
`
`
`
`Using the SCSI standard, Pucci’s ION node would respond to an
`INQUIRY command with the device class.
`
`Schmidt, p. 139; ’1842 Petition, p. 28; ’1863 Petition, p. 19; ’1864 Petition, p. 34
`
`18
`
`
`
`Using the SCSI standard, Pucci’s ION node would respond to an
`INQUIRY command with “00h” to signify the disk drive class.
`
`Schmidt, pp. 132-33; ’1842 Petition, p. 29; ’1863 Petition, pp. 19-20; ’1864 Petition, pp. 34-35
`
`19
`
`
`
`Pucci’s system uses SCSI to emulate a hard drive—just like the Tasler
`patents.
`
`’746 Patent, 3:49-53, 5:14-34; ’1863 Petition, pp. 7-8; see also, ’437 Patent, 3:51-56, 5:17-37; ’1842 Petition, pp. 7, 27;
`’399 Patent, 3:40-44, 6:3-22; ’1864 Petition, p. 7
`
`20
`
`
`
`Papst alleges that using SCSI in Pucci to emulate a disk drive would
`have led to unpredictable results.
`
`POR:
`
`’1863 POR, pp. 21-22; see also ’1842 POR, p. 22; ’1864 POR, pp. 17-18
`
`21
`
`
`
`Using the SCSI standard in Pucci to emulate a disk drive would not
`have led to unpredictable results.
`
`Dr. Zadok:
`
`’1863 Ex. 1054, ¶19; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 13; see also ’1842 Ex. 1054, ¶19; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 14;
`’1864 Ex. 1054, ¶32; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 15
`
`22
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: Pucci’s ION node could identify itself as a disk
`drive.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1056, 83:5-11; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 15; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 14; ’1864 Pet. Reply, pp. 16-17
`
`23
`
`
`
`Papst alleges that the combination is not obvious because the ION
`node could respond with a CHECK CONDITION status.
`
`POR:
`
`’1863 POR, p. 20; see also ’1842 POR, p. 21; ’1864 POR, p. 17
`
`24
`
`
`
`When executed properly, the ION node would not return a CHECK
`CONDITION status.
`
`Dr. Zadok:
`
`’1863 Ex. 1054, ¶27; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 15; see also ’1842 Ex. 1054, ¶27; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 16;
`’1864 Ex. 1054, ¶18; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 5
`
`25
`
`
`
`A CHECK CONDITION status is returned only if the target is unable to
`return INQUIRY data.
`
`Schmidt, p. 88; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 16; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 15; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 5
`
`26
`
`
`
`The SCSI standard uses the REQUEST SENSE command after a
`CHECK CONDITION status is returned.
`
`Dr. Zadok:
`
`’1863 Ex. 1054, ¶27; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 15; see also ’1842 Ex. 1054, ¶27; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 16;
`’1864 Ex. 1054, ¶17; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 5
`
`27
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: the system in the Tasler patents also returns a
`CHECK CONDITION if a read command requests an address beyond
`the size of the drive.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1055, 25:7-22; see also 1842 Pet. Reply, p. 22; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 21; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 12
`
`28
`
`
`
`Using the SCSI standard would not have rendered Pucci inoperable or
`unsatisfactory for its intended purpose.
`
`Pucci, p. 221; 1842 Pet. Reply, p. 15; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 14; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 16
`
`29
`
`
`
`Pucci in view of Kepley stores the
`processed analog data in memory as at
`least one file of digitized analog data
`(’437, ’746 patents)
`
`30
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’437 Patent stores the processed and digitized analog
`data in the data storage memory as a file.
`
`’437 Patent, Claim 1
`
`31
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’746 Patent stores the processed and digitized analog
`data in a file system as a file.
`
`’746 Patent, Claim 1
`
`32
`
`
`
`For storing processed and digitized analog data as a file, the Petitions
`rely on Pucci in view of Kepley.
`
`The Petition:
`
`’1863 Petition, p. 30; see also ’1842 Petition, p. 24; ’1864 Petition, p. 14
`
`33
`
`
`
`In his reply declaration, Dr. Zadok reiterated his reliance on Pucci in
`view of Kepley.
`
`Dr. Zadok:
`
`’1863 Ex. 1054, ¶12; ’1863 Pet. Reply pp. 5-6; see also ’1842 Ex. 1054, ¶12; ’1842 Pet. Reply, pp. 6-7
`
`34
`
`
`
`Pucci does not criticize, discredit, or discourage the use of a file-
`storage system—Pucci encourages the use of a file-storage system.
`
`Pucci, pp. 220-21, 222; ’1842 Petition, pp. 11, 24; ’1863 Petition, pp. 12-13, 30; ’1864 Petition, pp. 12, 14
`
`35
`
`
`
`Pucci is already designed to accommodate a file-storage system.
`
`Dr. Zadok:
`
`’1863 Ex. 1054, ¶9; ’1863 Pet. Reply, pp. 5-6; see also ’1842 Ex. 1054, ¶9; ’1842 Pet. Reply, pp. 6-7
`
`36
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: Pucci’s system can store file system data in
`the hard drive.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1056, 80:12-20; ’1863 Pet. Reply, pp. 8-9; see also ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 10
`
`37
`
`
`
`Papst’s argument that buffered data cannot be data stored as a file
`conflicts with the Tasler patents.
`POR:
`
`Tasler Patents:
`
`Compare ’1863 POR, p. 15, with ’746 Patent, 6:3-10;
`Compare ’1842 POR, p. 16, with ’437 Patent, 6:6-13;
`
`38
`
`
`
`In Pucci, user-loaded file transfer
`enabling software is not required
`(’437, ’746 patents)
`
`39
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’437 Patent recites the following negative limitation:
`
`’437 Patent, Claim 1
`
`40
`
`
`
`Claim 43 of the ’437 Patent recites the following negative limitation:
`
`’437 Patent, Claim 43
`
`41
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’746 Patent recites the following negative limitation:
`
`’746 Patent, Claim 1
`
`42
`
`
`
`Claim 34 of the ’746 Patent recites the following negative limitation:
`
`’746 Patent, Claim 34
`
`43
`
`
`
`Papst alleges that Pucci requires user-loaded file transfer enabling
`software and a user-loaded driver.
`
`POR:
`
`* * *
`
`’1863 POR, p. 24; see also ’1842 POR, p. 25; ’1864 POR, pp. 20-21
`
`44
`
`
`
`In Pucci, the workstation communicates with the ION node as if the
`node was a conventional device.
`
`Pucci, pp. 219-20; ’1842 Petition, pp. 33-34; ’1863 Petition, p. 38; ’1864 Petition, p. 12
`
`45
`
`
`
`In Pucci, the workstation is hardware independent, so driver changes to
`the host are unnecessary upon workstation upgrade.
`
`Pucci, pp. 219, 231; ’1842 Pet. Reply, pp. 8, 23; ’1863 Pet. Reply, pp. 7, 22; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 13
`
`46
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: Pucci’s SCSI interface is vendor independent.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1056, 61:6-18; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 23; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 22; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 13
`
`47
`
`
`
`The Tasler patents use a SCSI interface and a SCSI driver—just like
`Pucci.
`
`’746 Patent, 5:14-20, 10:14-24; ’1863 Petition, p. 7; see also ’437 Patent, 5:17-23, 10:23-33; ’1842 Petition, p. 7;
`’399 Patent, 6:3-10, 11:9-19; ’1864 Petition, p. 7
`
`48
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: operating systems had pre-installed SCSI
`drivers.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1056, 29:5-13; ’1842 Pet. Reply, pp. 21-22; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 21; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 12
`
`49
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: hosts with built-in SCSI drivers were common.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1056, 24:3-16; ’1842 Pet. Reply, pp. 21-22; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 21; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 12
`
`50
`
`
`
`Papst alleges that Pucci requires user-loaded file transfer enabling
`software and a user-loaded driver to know “where” to read and write
`data.
`
`POR:
`
`’1863 POR, p. 27; see also ’1842 POR, p. 28; ’1864 POR, pp. 21-22
`
`51
`
`
`
`In Pucci, driver changes to the host are unnecessary to know “where”
`to read and write data.
`
`Dr. Zadok:
`
`’1863 Ex. 1054, ¶31; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 21; see also ’1842 Ex. 1054, ¶31; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 22;
`’1864 Ex. 1054, ¶27
`
`52
`
`
`
`The Tasler patents use known standard access commands—just like
`Pucci.
`
`’746 Patent, 5:8-11, 5:66-6:3; ’437 Patent, 5:11-14, 6:2-6; ’399 Patent, 5:64-67, 6:55-59
`
`53
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: every operating system had standard access
`commands.
`
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1055, 17:12-18:4; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 19; ’1863 Pet. Reply, pp. 18-19
`
`54
`
`
`
`Papst’s expert admitted: standard software would gather hard disk
`parameters for data transfer.
`Mr. Gafford:
`
`Ex. 1055, 18:4-15; ’1842 Pet. Reply, p. 22; ’1863 Pet. Reply, p. 21; ’1864 Pet. Reply, p. 12
`
`55
`
`
`
`Papst’s arguments about user-loaded software are moot for the ’399
`patent.
`
`Papst: “it would have been illogical for a POSITA to configure an ION Node to
`respond with data indicating an input/output device customary in a host device, such
`as an 00h (disk drive) class, without first having user intervention to ensure the
`workstation had the proper software installed to work with the ION Node”
`’1864 POR, pp. 17-18
`But the ’399 claims do not forbid “user intervention”
`
`Papst: “Pucci’s disclosure of a controlling program/application that must be loaded on
`the host computer for communication to occur is contrary to the ’399 Patent’s explicit
`teachings of an interface device that requires no specialized software to be loaded
`on the host computer by a user”
`’1864 POR, pp. 20-21
`But the ’399 claims do not forbid user-loaded “specialized software”
`
`’1864 Reply, pp. 7-8, 10-11
`
`56
`
`
`
`Claim 1 of the ’399 Patent recites a customary device driver.
`
`’399 Patent, Claim 1
`
`57
`
`
`
`Claim 11 of the ’399 Patent recites a “specific driver for the multi-
`purpose interface.”
`
`* * *
`
`’399 Patent, Claim 11
`
`58
`
`