`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01842
`Patent 9,189,437
`___________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER APPLE INC.’S
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s April 27, 2017 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 11) and the Notice of Stipulation to Move Due Dates (Paper 13),
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. respectfully requests oral argument, which is currently
`
`scheduled for January 16, 2018, on the issues raised in the Petition for Inter Partes
`
`Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,189,437 (“the ’437 patent”), Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response, Patent Owner’s Response, Petitioner’s Reply to Patent
`
`Owner’s Response, Patent Owner’s Motion for Observations on Cross Examination
`
`and Petitioner’s Response to Patent Owner’s Motion for Observations. The issues to
`
`be argued are: 1) whether claims 1, 4–6, 9–12, 14, 15, 30, and 34 of the ’437 patent
`
`are obvious over the combination of Pucci, Kepley, and Schmidt; 2) whether claim
`
`16 of the ’437 patent is obvious over the combination of Pucci, Kepley, Schmidt,
`
`and Shinosky; 3) whether claims 13 and 18 of the ’437 patent are obvious over the
`
`combination of Pucci, Kepley, Schmidt, and Campbell; 4) whether claim 32 of the
`
`’437 patent is obvious over the combination of Pucci, Kepley, Schmidt, and Wilson;
`
`5) whether claim 43 of the ’437 patent is obvious over the combination of Pucci and
`
`Schmidt; and 6) whether claim 45 of the ’437 patent is obvious over the
`
`combination of Pucci, Schmidt, and Campbell.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`Lori A. Gordon, Reg. No. 50,633
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 5, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served electronically via e-mail on
`
`December 5, 2017, in its entirety on the following:
`
`
`Gregory S. Donahue (Lead Counsel)
`Minghui Yang (Back-up Counsel)
`Michael R. Fleming (Back-up Counsel)
`Anthony L. Meola (Back-up Counsel)
`Jason A Murphy (Back-up Counsel)
`Victor J. Baranowski (Back-up Counsel)
`Arlen L. Olsen (Back-up Counsel)
`gdonahue@dpelaw.com
`myang@dpelaw.com
`docketing@dpelaw.com
`mfleming@irell.com
`ameola@iplawusa.com
`jmurphy@iplawusa.com
`vbaranowski@iplawusa.com
`aolsen@iplawusa.com
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Lori A. Gordon/
`
`Lori A. Gordon, Reg. No. 50,633
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 5, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
