`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO., KG,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-01842
`Patent 9,189,437
`_______________
`___________________________________
`NOTICE OF PATENT OWNER PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO., KG’S
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`___________________________________
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and in accordance with the Scheduling Order of
`
`April 27, 2017 (Paper 11), Patent Owner hereby requests oral argument in this
`
`proceeding. Patent Owner requests that each side be given forty-five (45) minutes to
`
`present all arguments related to IPR2016-01842, IPR2016-01860, IPR2016-01863 and
`
`IPR2016-01864 which involve United States Patent No. 9,189,437 (“’437 Patent”),
`
`United States Patent No. 8,966,144 (“’144 Patent”), United States Patent No. 8,504,746
`
`(“’746 Patent”) and United States Patent No. 6,470,399 (“’399 Patent”), respectively.
`
`Because all of these patents have similar limitations and a common specification and
`
`because the same primary reference (“Pucci”) has been applied in all of these
`
`proceedings, Patent Owner submits that these proceedings should be argued together.
`
`Patent Owner believes oral argument would be beneficial to discuss whether the
`
`claims of the ‘437 Patent, ‘144 Patent, ‘746 Patent and ‘399 Patent would have been
`
`obvious over the cited prior art and proper claim construction of disputed terms of these
`
`patents. Patent Owner further believes oral argument would be beneficial to respond to
`
`any arguments raised in Petitioner’s original petitions and replies and to discuss any
`
`other issues or matters that arise during Petitioner’s presentation at oral argument or that
`
`have arisen previously during this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: December 5, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Gregory S. Donahue
`Gregory S. Donahue
`Reg. No. 47,531
`DiNovo Price LLP
`7000 North MoPac Expressway
`Suite 350
`Austin, TX 78731
`Telephone: (512) 539-2625
`Facsimile: (512) 539-2627
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner Papst
`Licensing GMBH & Co., KG
`
`Michael R. Fleming
`Reg. No. 67,933
`mfleming@irell.com
`Irell & Manella LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`Papst Licensing GMBH & Co., KG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 5th day of December 2017, a true and correct copy
`
`of the foregoing NOTICE OF PATENT OWNER PAPST LICENSING GMBH &
`
`CO. KG’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served by electronic mail
`
`upon the following counsel of record for Apple, Inc.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`Steven W. Peters
`Tyler J. Dutton
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`speters-ptab@skgf.com
`tdutton-ptab@skgf.com
`ptab@skgf.com
`
`/s/ Gregory S. Donahue
`
`Gregory S. Donahue
`Reg. No. 47,531
`DiNovo Price LLP
`7000 North MoPac Expressway
`Suite 350
`Austin, Texas 78731
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
