throbber
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG.
`Petitioner - Apple, Inc.
`Patent Owner - Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG.
`IPR2016-01841
`EXH. 2006
`
`1
`
`

`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: 11/467,092
`Filed: August 24, 2006
`Date: January 2, 2008
`Page — 7 —
`
`the memory 119 to a notebook computer to which the device is connected. One reason for this is
`
`that, for example, the bus buffers A and B are activated to electrically isolate the CPU 118 from
`
`accessing the memory when the device is connected to a PC. For this reason alone, for example,
`
`the new claims should be found to be patentable over the ‘545 patent.
`
`Other features of the new claims further evidence their patentability over all of the
`
`references that have been submitted to the Examiner assuming, for the sake of argument, that
`
`they are prior art. In this regard, the new claims recite, for example, that the ADGPD is adapted
`
`to cause a “response signa ” to be automatically sent to the PC without any user intervention by
`
`means of a deice external to the ADGPD. The new claims also recite that the response signal
`
`contains data that is consistent with the ADGPD being a device that can transfer files of digital
`
`data by means of a communications protocol (e.g., the SCSI command set), and that the ADGPD
`
`thereafter is subsequently able to process data transfer commands in accordance with the
`
`communications protocol.
`
`Exemplary structure that corresponds to this claim element is shown, for example, in
`
`Figure 2 of the patent application. In accordance with this exemplary embodiment, the central
`
`processing unit of the DSP shown in Figure 2 is adapted to cause a response signal to be sent to a
`
`connector via an interface, the response signal containing information that is consistent with the
`
`Figure 2 device being able to transfer files of digital data in accordance with a communications
`
`protocol (e.g., the SCSI command set) “without any user intervention by means of a device
`
`external to the ADGPD.”
`
`The use of the phrase “without any user intervention by means of a device external to the
`
`ADGPD” in the newly submitted claims means that (i) no user has to load an applications level
`
`2
`
`

`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: 1 1/467,092
`Filed: Augnlst 24, 2006
`Date: January 2, 2008
`Page — 8 —
`
`program onto a device external to the ADGPD (e. g., a PC) at any time and/or that (ii) no user has
`
`to interact with a device external to the ADGPD (e.g., setting up a file system on a PC ) at any
`
`time in order to allow the ADGPD to “thereafter subsequently” be “able to process data transfer
`
`requests in accordance with the communications protocol (e.g, the SCSI command set). The new
`
`claims are not limited to the structure illustrated in Figure 2 of the application.
`
`The ‘82l patent to Murata does not, for example, teach or suggest structure that
`
`corresponds to the above-described claim feature.
`
`In direct contrast to the claimed subject
`
`matter, all devices disclosed in the ‘821 patent affirrnatively require user intervention in order to
`
`cause the PC to understand how to communicate with the scanner disclosed in the patent. A
`
`short analysis in support of this conclusion follows.
`
`Column 4, lines 20-35 of the ‘82l patent state that an “mkfs” or “newfs” UNIX command
`
`must be executed before the scanner can be recognized. These commands are operating system
`
`commands, and have to be entered by the user or be embedded in an application program
`
`running on a workstation to which the ‘S21 patent scanner is connected. The commands require
`
`parameters to be given, including at least mkfs i~node device_name. This means that, for
`
`example, the user has to enter the node at which the file system is to be made and the device
`
`name (associated with the device file and driver in the system). These parameter values are not
`
`standard and may differ according to the actual hardware configuration of the workstation. If
`
`these commands are embedded in an application program, the application program can only be
`
`successfully run on different workstations if there is an appropriate means for entering the
`
`parameters by the user.
`
`As readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art, the UNIX operating
`
`3
`
`

`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: l 1/467,092
`Filed: August 24, 2006
`Date: January 2, 2008
`Page — 9 —
`
`system of the ‘E321 patent does not automatically recognize devices, nor does it perform data
`
`transmission with a device even though the device may emulate the UNIX file system. Detailed
`
`operator instructions or an application program containing the embedded instructions is required
`
`to administer and coordinate the data exchange described in the ‘821 patent. For this reason
`
`alone, for example, the new claims should be found to be patentable over the ‘821 patent.
`
`A Japanese language brochure describing a Nikon Coolpix 100 camera, an English
`
`translation thereof, and a one page specification describing the Nikon Coolpix 100 camera
`
`previously were submitted for the Examiner’s consideration. In a previously filed paper, the
`
`undersigned attorney stated that he assumed that the product illustrated in these documents
`
`operated in a manner consistent with, for example, the above-described US Patent No.
`
`5,917,545.
`
`Subsequent to the filing of that paper, an actual sample of the Nikon Coolpix 100 camera
`
`was obtained and analyzed. This analysis indicates that the sample product may not have exactly
`
`the same construction as the device that is illustrated in the ‘545 patent. For example, the bus
`
`buffers A and B shown in Figure 3 of the ‘545 patent (that are used to electrically isolate the
`
`CPU 118 from the memory 119 while the device is plugged into and receives power from a
`
`notebook computer) are not readily apparent in the Nikon Coolpix 100 product that was
`
`analyzed.
`
`The analysis also appears to indicate, however, that a microprocessor is put in a state
`
`where it is incapable of accessing a memory of the sample product when the sample product is
`
`plugged into and receives power from a notebook computer. As such, the microprocessor of the
`
`sample product is not capable of executing a set of instructions that cause data fiom the memory
`
`4
`
`

`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.2 ll/467,092
`Filed: August 24, 2006
`Date: January 2, 2008
`Page — 10 —
`
`to be transferred to the notebook computer.
`
`In previously filed papers, the Examiner was asked to assume, for the sake of argument,
`
`that various camera manuals, cameras, software and products (e. g., the information previously
`
`submitted ‘about the Nikon Coolpix 100 camera and various Casio products) actually were prior
`
`art. For purposes of clarity, the applicant takes this opportunity to reiterate that no admission is
`
`made as to whether or not any such material actually is prior art. In this regard, applicant
`
`disputes that all such previously submitted material is prior art to the newly submitted claims.
`
`Regarding the Nikon Coolpix 100 camera and information relating to the above-
`
`referenced camera manuals, etc., the assignee currently is investigating whether any of this
`
`information actually is prior art. As such, the applicant and assignee respectfully ask that the
`
`Examiner consider whether or not the currently pending claims are patentable over all such
`
`information. The issue of whether or not any such information is or is not prior art to the
`
`currently pending claims would become irrelevant if the Examiner were to agree with the
`
`undersigned attorney that the new claims are clearly patentable over all of this information.
`
`An IDS is being submitted herewith. One of the items referenced in the IDS is the above-
`
`referenced used Nikon Coolpix 100 camera that was obtained and analyzed. The Examiner is
`
`respectfully requested to consider all of the information disclosed in the IDS.
`
`A short validity analysis with respect to the sample Nikon Coolpix 100 camera is
`
`presented hereinafter. The Nikon Coolpix 100 camera does not, for example, teach or suggest
`
`one or more features of the new claims. One feature of the new claims that is not taught or
`
`suggested by the product is, for example, the claim feature that concerns a “central processing
`
`unit” of an “ADGPD processor” and a “program memory” that are configured both to cause
`
`5
`
`

`
`Applicant: Michael Tasler
`Application No.: 1 1/467,092
`Filed: August 24, 2006
`Date: January 2, 2008
`Page A 11 ~
`
`analog data to be generated and to cause digitized data representative of the analog data to be
`
`transferred to an i/o connector as discussed above. The microprocessor of the Nikon Coolpix
`
`100 camera that was analyzed cannot do both tasks because, for example, the microprocessor is
`
`put into a state it is incapable of accessing a data storage memory when the camera is plugged
`
`into a notebook computer. For this reason alone, for example, the new claims should be found to
`
`be patentable over the sample Nikon Coolpix 100 product that was obtained.
`
`The Examiner is respectfully requested to consider only the remarks made in this
`
`amendment when considering the patentability of the new claims submitted in this supplemental
`
`preliminary amendment.
`
`In this regard, the Examiner is respectfully asked to disregard all
`
`remarks and amendments made in all papers previously filed in this application or previously
`
`filed in any application of which the instant application claims priority.
`
`It is respectfully submitted that the new claims are in condition for allowance and,
`
`therefore, a formal notice to that effect is earnestly solicited.
`
`The Examiner is respectfully requested to contact the undersigned attorney upon entry of
`
`this supplemental preliminary amendment.
`
`Respect
`
`ly submitted
`
`e
`
`e
`
`. Salmon
`
`January 2, 2008
`Welsh & Katz, Ltd.
`120 South Riverside Plaza, 22nd Floor
`
`Attorney for Applicant
`Registration No. 37,435
`
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Telephone (312) 655-1500
`Facsimile (312) 655-1501
`E—mail jwsalmon@welshkatz.com
`
`6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket