throbber
Takata Ex. 1023
`IPR Petition - USP 9,043,093
`
`

`
`Advancements in coatings and texturing technology have made
`it possible. to control the appearance of these components so that
`they match the color, gloss and texture of the adjacent compo-
`nents.
`
`In the following Lest we will only discuss the deployment door or
`cover as produced in the injection molding process.
`
`Design Considerations
`
`Once the stylist has developed the desired shape of the door or
`cover, and the determination has been made to have a soft or
`
`hard surface. the design process can begin. The following are
`some of the issues that need to he addressed at that time. We
`
`should keep in mind that these issues are inter related and there-
`fore, design changes in one area may have a significant effect on
`the performance of another area of the part.
`
`I . Geometry of part shape.
`
`II. Location and design of the tear seam, (visible hidden or
`invisible).
`
`lIl. Methods of attachment of the door or cover to the
`
`deployment systern and surrounding components.
`IV. Selection of material.
`
`V. Selection of coatings to match color, gloss and texture
`of adjacent components.
`
`in the following. we will break down these steps and discuss
`how decisions are made in regard to the design direction.
`
`The major objectives that should be foremost in the mind of the
`designer when designing both driver covers and passenger side
`doors are:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Sirnplicity of design
`
`Structural integrity
`
`Simplicity and consistency of manufacttlre.
`
`Geometry of Part Shape
`
`This feature has a significant‘ relationship to the performance
`requirements of the design of the attaclimcnt system of the door
`or cover to the module. Parts having a shape that may tend to
`enlrap the airbag upon deployment can cause excessive loads
`being applied to the attachment features of the door. This is pri-
`marily a problem on passenger side doors when the tear of!"
`[lange design is used. Entrapment is due to the curvature of the
`top side of the instrument panel as shown in Figure 1. When
`encountering this condition a center tear scam rather than :1 tear
`off flange should he considered. The center tear seam allows the
`airbag to create its maximttin pressure at the weakest point of the
`door; that", being the tear seam. The result is that the tear seam is
`quickly opened with no entrapment of the airbag with rninimal
`force being applied. Using center tear scams allows the door to
`be designed with thinner attachment flanges and thereby, elimi-
`nation of the common problem of sink marks on the from sur-
`face of the door is achieved. In addition, since this design applies
`lcss force to the attachment flanges, the attachment system for
`securing the door to the module can be optimized for case of
`assembly. The benefits often are a reduction of. or the elimina-
`
`IBEC "94 I Automotive Body interior & Safety Systems - 85
`
`Airbag Door
`Development
`Technology
`Passenger
`And Driver
`
`Side Visible
`
`And Invisible
`
`Tear Seams
`
`James H. Zwcng
`Mayco Plastics, lnc.
`
`troduction
`
`
`
`ccordin g to the Institute for Highway Safety, when airbags and
`at belts are used together. they can save thousands of lives per
`ear on US. highways.
`
`1984 Transportation Secretary, Elizabeth Dole. mandated
`tomatic crash protection for passenger cars. Today. a congres-
`onal mandate requires one hundred percent of vehicles sold in
`e United States in l999 be equipped with both driver side and
`sscnger side airbags. Consideration is now being given to rear
`-at occupants as well as possible protection from side impact
`' rough the use of several emerging technologies.
`
`RW and Morton International are two of the several major
`nufacturers of airbag deployment systems. The key functional
`ments of an airbag system are the initiator. intlator, airbag pil-
`. reaction housing. deployment door! cover. gas generate and
`§['.I'.
`
`the. following. reference will be made to doors and covers.
`ors are being referred to as passenger side systems and
`ers are being referred to as driver side systems.
`
`I durability and pe.rl’ot'imutce requirements for airbag doors
`covers dictates that the structural design, materials used, and
`ufactu ring processes are very important considerations in the
`lopment of this component. Injection molded plastic, due to
`Ibility to meet the strict iequirements, is playing a major role
`development of the deployment doorfeover.
`
`

`
`This tear seam does not create any type of read through
`from the appearance side of the part‘.
`
`Although this design solves two very significant prol}
`lem, that being the read through and elimination of a
`visible tear seam. it does generate a few other concerns,
`
`The first concern being. that now the entire dynamic
`force is concentrated at a single attaclnnent flange. This
`means that there is more than double the dynamic load
`on the flange that was experienced with a center tear
`seam. The center tear seam was in effect two doors
`
`opening in opposite directions with only one half the
`mass on each door and two attachment‘ flanges to
`absorb the energy.
`
`Several methods have been developed to reinforce the
`single attachment llange to sustain the increased loati
`One method is the introduction of an insert molded
`
`scrim or rnetal stamping into the back side of the part
`Obviously. these additions create an undesirable eco-
`nomic impact on the cost of the door. however. in cer-
`tain cases the introduction of metal, used in conjunction
`with a lower cost plastic resin can create a favorable
`economic condition.
`
`A second concern is that often the design dictates mov-
`ing the tear seam downward and away from itrunediate
`contact with the second surface of the door, See Figure 3A.
`In this case, a wall of approximately 50% of the door
`thickness connects the attachment flange and tear seam
`to the door. This 50% thickness section of wall remains
`
`on the door during deployment of the airbag. The airbag
`
` Door hinge area
`
`
`
`X
`
`2Dfo30%otX
`
`Tecrr location
`
`Scrtrrt or metal reinforcerrient
`
`Attachment flanges
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3: Hidden tear seam
`
`
`
`20 to 30°}. of X
`
`Tear location
`
`tion of screws, rivets. or fasteners, thereby reducing the cost and
`complexity of the system.
`
`location & Design of the Tear Seam
`
`There are three types of tear seams.
`
`A. Visible
`
`B. Hidden
`
`C.
`
`Invisible
`
`A. Visible Tear Scams are the most common type used
`today. See Figure 2. With this design there is usually an
`indented groove in the first surface of the door or cover.
`This groove is placed directly over a thinned area on the
`second surface of the part. The purpose of the groove is
`to hide a read through of the second surface thin out
`area. which commonly occurs in injection molded parts
`where the wall thickness is abruptly changed on the
`second surface of the part.
`
`B.
`
`I-iidder-i Tear Seams are also quite common today on
`passenger side doors. This design offers a solution to
`the read through problem outlined in visibic tear seams,
`see Figure 3.
`
`Because there is no tear seam on the appearance surface
`of the part, no road through problem is created. Inherit
`to this design. the tear seam is moved on to the rear-
`ward artachment flange at the intersection of that flange
`to the second surface of the part. The [ear scam area is
`reduced to 20 to 30% of the wall thickness of the door.
`
`\It'tllIntrt¢|contarlcnrnunrn.tl-tocmataur
`allhadoorccmaauti-bngcrurmrnaut
`Frucftarepctntot
`
`............7
`
`Temoflllunge I'rut:t-are point
`Buck slda (znct) surtuce
`
`Attachment it
`Item otf Iiurlgeuflge 0'
`
`Fig. 1: Contour of the door may cause airbag entrapment
`
`Appearance (tat) surface
`
`Fig. 2: Visibie tear seam
`
`Fig. 3a: Detail of the hidden rear seam
`
`36 I Automotive Body Interior & Safety Systems I IBEC ’94
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`tends to be entrapped by this wall thereby, creating a
`force that wants to shear that "flange from the door. To
`resolve this concern additional 45 degree gusset ribs
`must be added to reinforce that wall so cracking and
`fragtrtentation of that wall does not occur. During
`airbag deployment. the additional gusset ribs have
`proven atleqnate to retain the rib to the door. however,
`this creates an entrapment problem for the airbag and
`thus. the force applied to the single attachment flange
`on the opposite side of the door is dramatically
`increased. Depending on the height of this rib, rein—
`forcement of the forward attachment flange may again
`be required.
`
`C.
`
`irlt‘iSi!'Ji£’ Tear Sermis are the. most desirable of all
`
`designs. It has been demonstrated that it is possible and
`practical, to injection mold ti driver side cover in a sin-
`gle molding process using a single shot material utiliz-
`ing invisible tear seams. Mayco has successfully con-
`cluded a program with one of the big three auto makers
`on a program of this type. Sttccesslitl deployments were
`obtained on the first deployment tests.
`
`As ofthis date, it has been difficult to accomplish invis-
`ible tear seams through the injection molding process
`on passenger side doors. without the introduction of a
`second layer of TPE that is over molded in a second
`shot operation onto a first shot molded substrate. see
`Figures 4 and 4a. The advantage of this type of two shot
`molded part is that appearance imperfections visible in
`the first shot substrate are covered by the second shot
`TPE. In addition, using TPE with a shore A hardness of
`50 dttrometer when molded onto a semi-rigid substrate
`matches the hardness of the soft instrument panel cover
`material.
`
`The significant advantages of the Mayco invisible tear seam
`designs are:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Surface shape design flexibility
`
`Improved performance
`
`Improved appearance
`
`4.
`
`Simplicity of operation at minimum cost.
`
`Surface Shape Design Flexibility
`
`For driver side covers of :1 single material, single shot design.
`invisible tear seams are difficult to achieve in many cases. The
`reason Ior this is that several gates are required into a single part
`in order to create the proper tlow direction of the. plastic as it
`enters the cavity of the mold. Due to the shape of the part and
`cosmetic constraints the ideal gate locations may not be allowed
`by the automobile manufacturer.
`In addition. one of the major
`factors in being able to mold a cosmetically pleasing pan is that
`equal flow lengths from each gate is highly desired. Therefore, if
`the part is rectangular like must driver side Covers, it is estren1e—
`ly difficult to achieve equal flow lengths.
`
`Two shot covers or doors are able to be produced with less diff"—
`culty. Using Mayco"s Plastics Inc. design, the second shot TPE.
`material covers the Cosmetic problems present on the first shot
`
`TPE soft cover (2nd shot)
`
`Rigid substrate (131 shot)
`
`Fig. 4: Soft‘ cover molded over a rigid substrate
`
`Fig. 4a: ‘H’a.-id ’U' style tear seams shown
`
`substrate and no flow problems exist vi ith the TPE man-nat. As 3
`result. the stylist can now develop V3.f'lCtLlf‘~' shapes with-out con-
`cern of encountering undesirable cosmetic in1pcrl'cction_-..
`
`Most passenger side doors are rectangular in shape and there-
`fore, single material, single shot doors. like the driver side cov-
`-ers, are difficult to produce in most" cases.
`
`Two material, two shot passenger side doors like driver side cov-
`ers are able to be produced with much less difficulty for the
`same reasons as two shot driver side covers.
`
`improved Door Performance
`
`Since the tear seam is invisible, the desired tear seam location
`can be selected for optimum performance. This usually means
`that an ‘H’ shape tear seam. which creates two doors upon Frac-
`ture of the tear seam. is desired. With this design each door is
`approximately U2 of the total door area. Also each door has it’s
`
`IBEC ’94 - Automotive Body interior .8.» Safety Systems - 8.7
`
`

`
`own separate hinge point. As a result. the dynamic energy exerts
`itself at two hinge points rather than one. This results in the
`attachment flanges having to absorb less than 13 of the energy
`of a door that has only a single hinge point. The end results are
`lower airbag pressures and "faster deployment speeds.
`
`f—
`
`improved Appearance
`
`Since no visible lines are present the appearance is greatly
`improved. tn addition, the passenger side area offers the oppor-
`tunity, with this design and process. to design the door as an
`integral part of the instrument panel soft topper pad. This results
`in no visible lines showing the outline of the door pcrirneter and
`therefore, eliminates any concern for the fit of a separate door as
`well as squeaks and rattles caused by two components.
`Variations in color, gloss and texture are also not a concern
`when using this design. With these concerns eliminated. the styl-
`ist is Free to create almost any shape desired. Also. since an inte-
`gral passenger door and topper pad is possible. the door now
`does not need to be attached to the airbag deployment system,
`thus allowing greater dimensional variations within the vehicle
`in that area. The complete topper pad of the instrument can be
`shipped to the assembly plant as a separate item. Upon assembly
`to the vehicle, the topper pad with integral deployment door.
`overlaps the deployment module thereby allowing for greater X,
`Y & Z dimensional variances between the module and the door.
`
`Simplicity of Operation of Minimum Cost
`
`The invisible tear seam proposed relies on a simple tensile fail-
`ure of the plastic in the tear seam area. The force required to ini-
`tiate this tensile failure can be a very easily controlled, since
`with injection molding, a very repeatable tear seam tlrickness can
`be obtained. For this reason, the amount of force required to
`cause the tensile failure in the tear scam by the inflating airbag
`pressing against the backside of the tear seam can be maintained
`within a very narrow range.
`
`There are no additional secondary operations performed on the
`tgar seam or auxiliary systems that weaken the tear seam prior to
`airbag deployment that could introduce variation to the system
`performance or increase the system cost.
`
`4°
`
`7
`

`§ an
`§ In —-
`g 0 —J-
`
`{
`l
`
`l
`l
`
`.
`3
`
`I
`
`F-t
`
`‘
`
`-1.
`
`..
`‘
`
`"3'
`
`-I—
`E‘ -—:t-_________ ___,r'_._._
`
`_m
`
`n
`
`5
`
`I
`to
`
`Is
`
`an
`
`25
`
`so
`
`as
`
`an
`
`.
`-as
`
`so
`
`limetmllllseconds)
`
`'jT"1
`AirBi::gPressure
`
`,
`
`Tl
`
`Peal: Pressure: 35.15 peig
`
`l__
`
`Fig. 5: Air bag pressure vs. inflation time
`
`this shock to as much area as possible. Localized fasteners s
`as rivets or screws are usually insufficient‘ to withstand th‘
`shock unless they are combined with steel plates to help dism
`me the load.
`
`The type of materials selected also has a major effect on
`attachment system. Soil materials with low flex modulus val
`require additional area for retention. I-Iigh flex modulus mate
`als tend to crack and break especially at low temperatures wifl
`the shock of the deployment.
`
`Methods of Attachment
`
`Selection of Material
`
`Methods of attachments of driver side eove.rs and passenger side
`doors to the deployment system andfor surrounding components
`vary widely and are usually influenced by the design of the sys-
`tem. the type of material the doorfdover is made of and personal
`preference of the system supplier. One thing that is universally
`common between system suppliers is that fasteners such as
`screws, rivets or rivet plates and additional components are
`attempted to be minimized or completely avoided as a means of
`retaining the doorfcover to the deployment module. Doors and
`covers that are snapped into place, or are combined with other
`assembly operations of the module assembly are preferred. The
`fact that the bag pressure rapidly increases from zero to some-
`times as high as 0.3 MPa (50 psi"). see Figure 5, within a few
`milliseconds demonstrates that the attachment system needs to
`he very strong in order to absorb the shock of the deployment.
`For that reason. it is advisable to spread out the load created by
`
`88 0 Automotive Body interior & Safety Systems t IBEC '94
`
`The OEM nianufactuners have traditionally dictated the ntateri
`specification for the desired surface appearance and degree at
`softness of the SIR system.
`
`If a single shot hard door or cover is desired there are severfl
`materials which have been developed for this application. So
`of the current materials used for these applications are:
`
`D & S Plastics Dexllex 756-67 and 756-5? TPO
`
`Union Carbide DEFA lll47BI(_. TPO
`
`DuPont DYM 100 and 500 thermoplastic polyester
`elastomer.
`
`In some cases, such as top mounted passenger side doors, some-
`materials may need to be supported by reinforcements that may
`be molded into the door or assembled in a secondary operation
`al’tc.r the door is molded. This is necessary as a result of the low
`
`

`
`flex modulus and low heat deflection properties. (as low as
`83 MPa (11000 psi} flex modulus and as low as approximately
`60°C (l40°F) heat deflection temperature). ll5°C (?.40°F) tem-
`peratures are experienced in this area.
`
`In other cases such as driver side covers, and front mounted pasv
`senger side doors, auxiliary support of these materials is rarely
`required given that the proper design is engineered. The most
`obvious reason that this is true is that these parts usually have
`more shape to support themselves and lower temperatures are
`experienced in these areas of the vehicle. approximately
`82°C t 1 80°F}.
`
`If a soft door or cover is desired a two shot molded part must be
`produced. In order to achieve the desired results, some of the
`plastic materials used are different than what is used in single
`shot parts.
`
`The materials most often used for the first shot substrate are:
`
`D & S Plastics, Dexflex 756-67 or 756-57. TFO
`
`Union Carbide. DEFA l047BI(, TPO
`
`Conclusion
`
`By utilizing the injec.tion molding process:
`
`E*‘!‘'-‘:‘'
`
`The parts possess higher quality.
`Manufacturing scrap rates are significantly reduced.
`The dimensional consistency increases due to the injec—
`tion molding process.
`4. Manufacturing efficiency is improved due to higher
`tooling production capacity.
`5. Greater design flexibility exists.
`
`The result is that significant economic savings are obtained.
`
`The value of the dual layer deployment door design is recog-
`nized by all OEM company's and their major restraint system
`suppliers.
`
`Over a half million two shot molded doors with hidden tear
`seams are on production vehicles today and construction of addi-
`tional tools is currently under way for new programs. Additional
`programs for invisible tear seam parts are currently in various
`stages of completion at this time.
`
`__.__:_____._______
`
`DuPont Bexloy, Ethyleneflt/lethacrylic Acid
`
`Biography
`
`The materials most" often used for the second shot cover are:
`
`Multibase RP6568 Thermoplastic Elastomer
`
`Teknor Apex Tekron 4-’ltlt}-4ll
`
`Through the innovative use of these materials. a unique hinge
`function is achieved. A layer of styrenic thermoplastic elastomer
`for the first shot substrate and a thinner layer of Ihennoplaslic
`olefin elastomer for the second shot outer cover are used to con—
`struct a part with application temperature ranges from
`-40°C (40°F) to +1 15°C (240°F). This specially formulated
`styrenic thermoplastic elastomer possesses at very low glass tran-
`sition temperature of and superior elasticity and ductility at In“
`temperatures. The unique thermoplastic olefin elastorner has
`high impact strength at elevated tcmpcrattlres. When these two
`layers of elastomers are combined. the hinge point moves along
`an are contingent upon the parts service temperature. This
`unique hinge provides for balanced performance between
`-40°C‘. (- 40°F) to +l l5°C (240°F). For the first time. the dual
`layer structure and moving hinge theory has been applied in
`designing an airbag deployment Door.
`
`Coatings
`
`A two component polyurethane paint system produced by Akzo
`Industrial Coatings, Sherwin Williams, Bee Chemical and others
`are currently being used in one and two mil dry film thickness
`coating. These coatings are capable of achieving a surface with a
`leather—like feel and look. The coatings are capable of meeting
`the ultraviolet light resistance as required for automotive interior
`applications and have been used successfully in automotive
`applications for several years.
`
`waterborne coatings are currently under development for these-
`applications as well.
`
`
`
`Mr. James Zweng r‘rtm:=rtti_t' holu'.r the posi-
`tion of Vice Presidem o_,I"Eugiin=r=riitg or
`Mrr_\-‘i.‘r.J PitJ5t‘ft"5‘. Int‘.
`
`Mr. Zirerrg has been i'n1'ot't‘m’ in t'ir;'t'c'rit:ir
`ill-r:)i’t'J‘l".I'it.!3 .sim‘e ('96-if n'l.=ere he in.r'.ri'ol'i_\'
`began as a mold d¢-.s-r';:ne:- for C‘w'1'er
`Errzioorrotz. a Detroit heme? rrxrlbig mm-
`PW")
`
`
`
`III I906 in formal _Un's:l1'jI P3413-3.. I
`l|tu1':n.Mirh:=I unfit}-. 0&0}:-H-
`-: aqiruun -andpun-aifirtr:-
`an--e -chart. flu fin -fnrjlgfi
`aa-2-, n-n'4{_uu-s=u:.fiCj-
`--;:t'.'u'r.'.' ~"r-'I-: -we.-=-...—‘.-"J: p’-Ecu-
`
`;,. _.m_.-..t in. J/,JJl-I'1J-' u.._....P-_a=. . in Fran ua......_. _-xi
`
`mt‘-‘r. Hi-. ;.‘r:tr:.-rt} rum r.-.1-2'-arr 3- in-Jafi Jr: DT
`int: fnfatti‘ and ‘I’! s'r-.t- :' Iirr rmzrn-:1-.-.-.: .fir:!hrlIIrI D l"§7b
`Hmtcd to H: -' Pr't'.Ud’c'rn'
`.-_.' Engineering 1' II’-tr r I111!‘
`Ste:'!i‘ni,v Ht'i_;Jli:_\, ‘|t‘:.-f:.f;..*rr In 2'45-9 Hr. Irv!‘ _-can-at g Ivy.“
`rict‘e[o,rr.=ncvn ;Jmnp .1:
`'H.:_-.:«- ‘.-'.-.r riir _-nip-u-ac -a 31¢‘-jfl
`Doom rmd C'r':iw'_r_,riir the srsir.-.‘r:I.-in i r hulnirn
`
`
`
`IBEC "94 0 Automotive Body Interior & Safety Systems - 89

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket