throbber
Ejection rule could change side airbags
`
`IIHS and HLDI
`
` logos
`
`RATINGS
`
`NEWS
`
`TOPICS
`
`VIDEO
`
`STATUS REPORT
`
`Highway safety research
`& communications
`
`Home » Status Report » 2011 » Article
`
`Status Report, Vol. 46, No. 4 | April 26, 2011
`
`Subscribe
`
`New ejection rule may spur changes in side airbags
`
`More on rollover crashes
`
`More on airbags
`
`Side curtain airbags that deploy in rollovers as well as side impacts are expected to become
`the norm, thanks to a new federal standard aimed at decreasing ejections from passenger
`vehicles. The rule, issued in January by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
`(NHTSA), also provides an incentive for manufacturers to use laminated glass on side
`windows, something the Institute backs.
`
`While supporting the goals of the regulation, Institute researchers point out that it requires
`some changes to current airbags that aren't proven to be needed. It's unclear how those
`changes will affect crash protection.
`
`"Research shows that side curtain airbags are very effective at reducing injury risk in side
`crashes," notes Matthew Brumbelow, a senior research engineer for the Institute. "We hope
`the changes required by the new regulation don't diminish this."
`
`Rollovers make up about 3 percent of all crashes but more than a third of passenger vehicle
`occupant deaths. Nearly half the people killed in rollovers are thrown from vehicles. NHTSA
`has estimated that occupants who are fully ejected are 56 percent more likely to die than those
`who remain in a vehicle during a rollover. Most ejected people go through side windows, and
`the vast majority are unbelted.
`
`Side airbags that deploy in a rollover can play a key role in keeping occupants inside the
`vehicle. They deploy from the roof downward in response to sensors that measure a vehicle's
`sideways movement and tilt.
`
`Most new vehicles come with side airbags to protect the head and torso, and the equipment is
`on its way to becoming universal because of new standards for side protection. Manufacturers
`now are expected to modify side airbags in response to the new ejection rule. In addition to
`deploying in a rollover, the airbags will need to cover more of the side windows and stay
`inflated longer than airbags designed solely for side impacts.
`
`Airbags in some vehicles already do all that, but most of them still will have to be changed to
`meet the standard. That's because NHTSA is requiring systems that prevent the equivalent of
`an unbelted adult's head from moving more than 4 inches past the side window opening. Most
`current side airbags allow more movement than that, and it's unclear that such a strict standard
`is necessary.
`
`http://www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/46/4/4[5/6/2017 9:55:21 PM]
`
`Side airbag coverage gaps that could result in occupant
`ejection were revealed in NHTSA tests like this one.
`
`IPR 2016-01790
`American Vehicular Sciences
`Exhibit 2034
`
`

`

`Ejection rule could change side airbags
`
`The 4-inch rule is intended to prevent a situation in which an airbag gets pushed outside the
`vehicle so far that the bottom of it falls out, creating a gap through which a person could be
`ejected. NHTSA says the 4-inch rule is used in standards concerning certain aspects of
`vehicle doors and bus windows and in international building codes for stair and balcony railings.
`But those standards all have to do with the width of openings, while in the new regulation the
`4-inch limit refers to how far the test device can move outside the window as it pushes on the
`airbag, not to the size of a resulting opening.
`
`Of the 24 vehicles with rollover airbags NHTSA tested ahead of the rule, only 1 met the
`requirement. The others will need changes, probably stiffer airbags that inflate more powerfully.
`The effects of these changes in other crashes are unknown, but it's possible that stiffer airbags
`could be less effective at preventing head or neck injuries in some cases. Added force when
`an airbag deploys also could cause injuries. Up to this point, injuries from side airbag
`deployments have been rare, in part because of voluntary guidelines manufacturers adopted to
`minimize inflation injuries (see "Consumers get new information on side airbags with reduced
`injury risk," Sept. 13, 2004).
`
`In announcing its decision, NHTSA cited 6 real-world cases in which rollover airbags didn't
`prevent ejection. In none of the cases was there evidence an occupant pushed past a too-
`weak airbag — the issue the 4-inch rule is meant to address. Instead, the airbags may have
`had deployment problems or simply didn't cover enough of the window.
`
`"Although there have been some ejections from vehicles with rollover airbags, there's no
`compelling evidence that the 4-inch rule will fix that," Brumbelow says. The Institute expressed
`reservations about the 4-inch limit in a comment to NHTSA last year.
`
`The Institute got a more favorable response to its suggestion that NHTSA encourage the use
`of shatter-proof laminated glass for side windows as a complement to side airbags. The rule
`allows side windows to remain rolled up for 1 of 2 required tests. That way, the window can
`help keep side airbags in place during the test, providing an incentive for stronger glass.
`
`The standard will be phased in beginning in 2013, with all new vehicles required to meet it by
`the 2018 model year. NHTSA estimates that when fully implemented, the requirement will
`prevent 373 deaths and 476 serious injuries every year. Institute researchers believe those
`estimates are high because NHTSA undercounts the benefit of a more stringent roof strength
`standard to be phased in by 2017. Institute studies have shown that stronger roofs reduce the
`risk of occupant ejection (see Status Report special issue: roof strength, March 24, 2009).
`
`Also in this issue
`First crash tests of electric cars
`
`Hours-of-service proposal still has flaws
`
`Proposal calls for truck onboard recorders
`
`ACCESS MORE ISSUES
`
`Media contact
`Russ Rader
`Senior Vice President, Communications
`rrader@iihs.org
`office +1 703 247 1530
`mobile +1 202 257 3591
`
`For more information, visit our press room.
`
`Press room
`Broadcast-standard
`video and info for
`the media
`
`About us
`Contact us
`FAQ
`
`Our Vehicle
`Research Center
`
`Recent IIHS & HLDI
`presentations
`
`Member groups
`& funding associations
`
`Consumer safety
`brochures
`
`Help page
`
`Privacy policy
`
`Vehicle testing &
`highway safety links
`
`Subscribe to news updates
`
`Watch our channel
`
`Follow us
`
`Mobile ratings & news
`
`©1996-2017, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute, 501(c)(3) organizations | Copyright information
`
`http://www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/46/4/4[5/6/2017 9:55:21 PM]
`
`

`

`Ejection rule could change side airbags
`
`http://www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/46/4/4[5/6/2017 9:55:21 PM]
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket