throbber
~rostate journal.
`· 3• no. 2 (Apr-Jun 2001)
`General Collection
`W1 PR771S
`2002-03-04 08:01 :44
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`Hospira 1011
`1 of 9
`
`

`
`Daniel P. Petrylak, M.D.
`New York, New York, USA
`
`Alan Pollack, M.D., Ph.D.
`Houston, Texas, USA
`
`Jerome P. Richie, M.D.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Oliver Sartor, M.D.
`New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
`
`William R. Sellers, M.D.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Nicholas Vogelzang, M.D.
`Chicago, Illinois, USA
`
`Hiraki Watanabe, M.D.
`Kyoto, Japan
`
`Tomoyuki Shirai, M.D., Ph.D.
`Nagoya, Japan
`
`Kenneth I. Wishnow, M.D.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Mack Roach, M.D.
`San Francisco, California, USA
`
`Eric J. Small, M.D.
`San Francisco, CA, USA
`
`David P. Wood, Jr., M.D.
`Detroit, Michigan, USA
`
`Bruce J. Roth, M.D.
`Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
`
`Howard Sandler, M.D.
`Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
`
`James Talcott, M.D., S.M.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Bruce R. Zetter, Ph.D.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Clare Tempany, M.D.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Anthony Zietman, M.D., B.S.
`Boston, Massachusetts, USA
`
`Editorial Office. Philip W. Kantoff, M.D., Editor, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115 (617)
`632-3466 Fax (617) 632-2165. Production Editor. Mary Thomas Stone, Blackwell Science, Inc., Malden, MA. Publish(cid:173)
`ing, Subscription, and Advertising Office. Blackwell Science, Inc., Commerce Place, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA
`02148 (781) 388-8250 Fax (781) 388-8260. POSTMASTER SEND ADDRESS CHANGES TO The Prostate Journal, Blackwell
`Science, Inc., Commerce Place, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Published Quarterly. Advertising and Reprint
`Requests. Please direct to Tom Palmisano, Blackwell Science, Inc. Annual Rates (2001): Individual, USA $75; Individual,
`Canada/Mexico $90; Individual, Overseas $100; Institution, USA $150; Institution, Canada/Mexico $165; Institution, Overseas $175;
`Single issue $25, prices include postage. Subscription Information. The Prostate Journal (ISSN 1095-5100) is published
`quarterly by Blackwell Science, Inc., Commerce Place, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 (781) 388-8250 Fax (781)
`388-8260. Subscription term is Jan.-Dec. Claims for missing issues will be serviced at no charge if received within 90 days
`of the cover date for domestic subscribers and 6 months for subscribers outside the US. Duplicate copies cannot be sent to
`replace issues not delivered because of failure to notify publisher of change of address. Please notify publisher of new address
`six weeks in advance of moving date. All subscriptions are payable in advance in US funds drawn on a US bank. If not fully
`satisfied, notify publisher for a refund on all unmailed issues. For Canadian orders, our GST number is 129864823RT-OOOI.
`Copyright © Blackwell Science, Inc.
`Copyright Notice. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to this journal have not been published and
`will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the authors agree that the copyright for
`their article is transferred to Blackwell Science, Inc. if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright covers
`the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, photographic reproductions, microform or any
`other reproductions of similar nature and translations. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
`system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying,
`recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Photocopying information for users
`in the USA. The Item-Fee Code for this publication indicates that authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal
`use is granted by the copyright holder for libraries and their users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC)
`Transactional Reporting Service provided the stated fee for copying beyond that permitted by Section 107 or 108 of the
`United States Copyright Law is paid. The appropriate remittance of $15.00 per copy per article is paid directly to the
`Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Permission for other use. The copyright
`owner's consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, for promotion, for creating new works, or for resale.
`Specific written permission must be obtained from Blackwell Science, Inc. for such copying. The Item-Fee Code for this
`publication is: 1095-5100/01/$15.00/0.
`
`Hospira 1011
`2 of 9
`
`

`
`The Prostate Journal
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Vol. 3, Number 2, April/May/June 2001
`
`Minireviews - Section Editor: Daniel George, MD
`HER-Kinase-Directed Therapy of Prostate Cancer
`D. B. Solit, D. B. Agus
`
`Is Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Before Radical Prostatectomy Indicated?
`J. Chun, R. S. Pruthi
`
`Original Articles
`A Phase II Trial of Humanized Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
`Antibody for the Treatment of Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer
`D. M. Reese, P. Fratesi, M. Corry, W. Novotny, E. Holmgren, E. J. Small
`
`Treatment of Metastatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer with
`Ketoconazole Hydrocortisone, and Cyclophosphamide
`A. Pecora, F. Richter, A. Pavlick, V. Lanteri, J. Scheuch, S. Levy, G. Rosenberg,
`J. Vitenson
`
`Structure-Based Androgen Receptor Gene Mutation Database: A Tool to Link
`Molecular Location and Receptor Function
`L. Brive, D. B. Agus, K. R. Ely
`
`Expression of Prostate Specific Molecules in Bacille Calmette-Guerin:
`An Immunotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer
`C. D. Zeoli, M. Maitland, H. Rose, B. Bloom, A. Mittleman, J. Geliebter
`
`Lack of Effect of Aminoglutethimide and Hydrocortisone Added to High-Dose
`Bicalutamide for Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer
`G. J. Bubley, S. P. Balk, R. M. Joyce, M.-E. Taplin
`
`Sustained Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK) Signaling
`in Human Prostate Cancer LNCaP Cells Depleted of Androgen
`L. Drew, R. L. Fine, A. J. Raffo, D. P. Petrylak
`
`Intermediate-Term Outcome with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate
`Cancer: The Cleveland Clinic Experience
`P. E. Clark, H. S. Levin, P. A. Kupelian, C. Reddy, C. D. Zippe, E. A. Klein
`
`Article Reviews - Section Editor: William Oh, M.D.
`
`The Prostate Journal Database - William Oh, M.D.
`
`53
`
`59
`
`65
`
`71
`
`76
`
`92
`
`98
`
`105
`
`118
`
`126
`
`131
`
`Hospira 1011
`3 of 9
`
`

`
`A Phase II Trial of Humanized Anti-Vascular
`Endothelial Growth Factor Antibody for the
`Treatment of Androgen-Independent
`Prostate Cancer
`
`David M. Reese, PhD,* Paige Fratesi, BS,* Michelle Corry, RN,*
`William Novotny, MD,t Eric Holmgren, PhD/ and
`Eric J. Small, MD*
`*Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Urologic
`Oncology Program, University of California, San Francisco, California,
`U.S.A.
`tGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
`is a glycoprotein that is important in promoting tumor
`angiogenesis. Recombinant humanized anti
`(rhuMAb)-VEGF is a humanized murine monoclonal
`antibody that neutralizes VEGF activity and has shown
`promise in animal tumor models. Methods: To evalu(cid:173)
`ate the efficacy and safety of single-agent rhuMAb
`VEGF in metastatic androgen-independent prostate
`cancer (AIPC), we treated 15 patients with 10 mg/kg
`rhuMAb VEGF every 14 days for six infusions (one
`cycle), followed by additional treatment for selected
`patients who had a response or were stable. Results:
`After one cycle, none of the 15 patients who were
`evaluable for tumor response had an objective com(cid:173)
`plete or partial response. Three possible mixed re(cid:173)
`sponses were observed. No patient achieved a >50%
`decrease in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a
`secreted glycoprotein with potent effects on both
`normal and pathologic angiogenesis (1). Many
`solid tumors, including lung, thyroid, breast, co(cid:173)
`lon, kidney, bladder, ovary, and brain cancers,
`have increased VEGF expression (2). It has been
`postulated that paracrine growth loops exist
`whereby tumor cells secrete VEGF, which then
`interacts with specific receptors (e.g., Flk-1/
`KDR) on endothelial cells to promote tumor an(cid:173)
`giogenesis.
`
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Eric J.
`Small, MD, UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, 2356
`Sutter Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94115, U.S.A.
`
`fl) 2001, Blackwell Scie11ce, Inc. 1095-5100/01/$15.00/65
`The Prostate .Jo11mal. Volume 3, Number 2, 2001 65-70
`
`after one cycle. Four patients (27'Yo) had a PSA decline
`of <50%, three patients (20%) had a PSA level in(cid:173)
`crease of <50%, and eight patients (53%) had a PSA
`increase of >50%. The median time to objective pro(cid:173)
`gression was 118 days, and the median time to PSA
`progression was 57 days. Toxicity was generally mild,
`with asthenia present in 6 (40%) of 15 patients. Se(cid:173)
`vere hyponatremia developed in two patients, al(cid:173)
`though the association with rhuMAb VEGF was un(cid:173)
`clear. Conclusions: We concluded that single-agent
`rhuMAb VEGF in this dose and with this schedule did
`not produce significant objective responses in patients
`with AIPC. Further development of this agent in pa(cid:173)
`tients with prostate cancer should focus on earlier
`stage disease or should evaluate it in combination with
`other therapies.
`
`VEGF may play a role in the pathogenesis
`and progression of human prostate cancer. Flk-
`1 /KDR receptors are expressed in human pros(cid:173)
`tate cancer, and their presence may correlate
`with higher grade lesions (3). In addition, VEGF
`is present in both localized and metastatic pros(cid:173)
`tate tumors as well as the plasma of patients with
`metastatic disease, and increasing expression
`may correlate with disease progression (4,5). Fi(cid:173)
`nally, antibodies to VEGF have caused tumor re(cid:173)
`gression in preclinical animal prostate tumor
`models (6-8).
`Recombinant humanized anti-VEGF
`(rhuMAb VEGF) is a monoclonal immuniglolrn(cid:173)
`lin gl antibody generated by engineering the
`VEGF-binding residues in a murine antibody into
`the framework of a normal human antibody (9).
`
`65
`
`Hospira 1011
`4 of 9
`
`

`
`66
`
`The Prostate Journal, Volume 3, Number 2, April 2001
`
`rhuMAb VEGF effectively neutralizes VEGF ac(cid:173)
`tivity in vivo and inhibits the growth of a variety
`of human cancer cell lines in nude mouse tumor
`models (10-12). in Phase I clinical trials in hu(cid:173)
`mans, there was minimal toxicity of rhuMAb
`VEGF ( 13), and the antibody is now being evalu(cid:173)
`ated for the treatment of a variety of solid tu(cid:173)
`mors.
`Based on the above observations, a Phase II
`trial of rhuMAb VEGF in patients with androgen(cid:173)
`independent prostate cancer (AIPC) was con(cid:173)
`ducted. The primary objectives of this trial were
`to determine whether single-agent rhuMAb
`VEGF would result in objective responses in pa(cid:173)
`tients with AIPC, to test the effect of rhuMAb
`VEGF on prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in
`these patients, and to further evaluate the safety
`of this antibody.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Patients
`Eligibility criteria for inclusion in the study in(cid:173)
`cluded histologic diagnosis of prostatic adenocar(cid:173)
`cinoma and disease progression despite androgen
`deprivation and antiandrogen therapy with(cid:173)
`drawal. Patients had to have documented mea(cid:173)
`surable or evaluable metastatic disease and a se(cid:173)
`rum PSA level >5 ng/ml. Three consecutive
`increases in the serum PSA level, each measured
`at least 2 weeks apart, were required. Prior sec(cid:173)
`ond-line hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, im(cid:173)
`munotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, or
`other investigational therapy was permitted pro(cid:173)
`vided that treatment was completed at least 4
`weeks before enrollment and that disease pro(cid:173)
`gression had occurred despite that therapy. Prior
`radioisotope therapy (strontium-89 or sa(cid:173)
`marium-153) was permitted provided that treat(cid:173)
`ment had occurred at least 60 days preceding the
`rhuMAb VEGF therapy. If patients were receiv(cid:173)
`ing a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone
`analog, this was continued. A life expectancy of
`26 months and an Eastern Cooperative Oncol(cid:173)
`ogy Group (ECOG) performance status score of
`0-1 were required. Because of the possibility that
`rhuMAb VEGF could inhibit angiogenesis in
`nontumor tissues, patients were excluded if they
`had clinically significant cardiovascular disease
`(i.e., uncontrolled hypertension, recent unstable
`angina or myocardial infarction, congestive heart
`failure, cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication,
`or significant peripheral vascular disease). In ad(cid:173)
`dition, patients with any history or radiologic
`
`evidence of central nervous system metastases
`were excluded. Because Phase I studies with
`rhuMAb VEGF therapy reported severe episodes
`of bleeding, the current or recent use of oral or
`parenteral anticoagulants, including aspirin, was
`an exclusion criterion. Required values for initial
`laboratory data included the following: white
`blood cell count >2500/pl and absolute neutro(cid:173)
`phil count (ANC) >1000/pl; platelet count
`>75,000/µl; total bilirubin, AST, and ALT less
`than twice the upper limits of normal; serum cre(cid:173)
`atinine :.:;l,5 mg/dl; and hemoglobin >9 g/dl. The
`protocol was approved by the University of Cali(cid:173)
`fornia, San Francisco, Institutional Review
`Board, and written informed consent was ob(cid:173)
`tained from all patients.
`
`Treatment Plan
`rhuMAb VEGF was supplied by Genentech, Inc
`(South San Francisco, CA) and was administered
`intravenously in the outpatient clinic. The anti(cid:173)
`body was administered at a dose of 1 O mg/kg
`every 14 days for six infusions (one cycle). The
`initial dose was given over a 90-min period, the
`second dose over 60 min, and all subsequent
`doses over 30 min if the prior infusions were
`tolerated without infusion-associated adverse
`events. Patients experiencing infusion-related ef(cid:173)
`fects such as fever, chills, myalgia, headache,
`rash, fatigue, dyspnea, or hypotension were
`treated symptomatically with acetaminophen,
`diphenhydramine, meperidine, or other medica(cid:173)
`tions as clinically indicated. Patients with an ob(cid:173)
`jective response or stable disease were eligible to
`receive additional rhuMAb VEGF treatment be(cid:173)
`yond one cycle.
`
`Response, Assessments, and Toxicity
`A physical examination, vital signs, ECOG per(cid:173)
`formance status evaluation, and laboratory
`evaluation were performed every 2 weeks. Se(cid:173)
`rum and plasma also were collected every 2
`weeks to determine VEGF and rhuMAb VEGF
`levels.
`Toxicity was graded according to the Na(cid:173)
`tional Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria
`(Version 1). Response to therapy was assessed
`with serial scrum PSA measurements and imag(cid:173)
`ing studies. Bone scans and, when appropriate,
`computed axial tomography scans were obtained
`at baseline and after every cycle of therapy. For
`patients with bidimensional measurable disease,
`
`Hospira 1011
`5 of 9
`
`

`
`Reese et al.: Anti-VEGF Antibody in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer
`
`67
`
`the standard response criteria were used. Stable
`disease was not used as a response category but
`was used to determine eligibility for additional
`VEGF treatment after the first cycle. A PSA re(cid:173)
`sponse was defined as a 250% decrease in serum
`PSA level relative to baseline during three con(cid:173)
`secutive measurements each made at least 2
`weeks apart. Progression was defined as the fol(cid:173)
`lowing: development of new bone pain lasting
`>2 weeks that required a persistent increase in
`opioid analgesic use; the appearance of new le(cid:173)
`sions on bone scan, a >25% increase in the size
`of a metastatic lesion present at screening, or
`both; or a 250% increase in serum PSA level
`from baseline or nadir, whichever was lower, on
`two or more determinations each at least 2
`weeks apart. Stable patients with disease had
`neither a response nor progressive disease and
`also were required to have an unchanged or im(cid:173)
`proved ECOG performance status score.
`
`Pharmacokinetic Analysis
`Individual and mean serum rhuMAb VEGF con(cid:173)
`centration-time data and serum VEGF concen(cid:173)
`tration-time data were obtained and plotted, and
`estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were
`summarized. In addition, serum rhuMAb VEGF
`concentration-time data were analyzing using a
`one-compartment model by nonlinear least(cid:173)
`squares regression. Serum rhuMAb data were
`not available at all time points for each patient
`since patients withdrew from the study at differ(cid:173)
`ent times and the number of sample collections
`varied. Mean rhuMAb VEGF concentration-time
`profiles were therefore plotted for the period
`from Day 0 to Day 70, for which data were avail(cid:173)
`able for all patients (using nominal times).
`
`Statistical Analysis
`The primary end points of the study were objec(cid:173)
`tive tumor response and changes in serum PSA
`level from baseline. Secondary end points in(cid:173)
`cluded response duration, time to progression,
`overall survival, and changes in quality of life,
`pain, and analgesic use. The study had a three(cid:173)
`stage design, in which 15 patients were to be
`treated with an initial cycle of rhuMAb VEGF. If
`one or more responses were observed in the first
`15 patients, a total of up to 60 patients could be
`enrolled. An analysis of efficacy and safety was
`performed on all patients who received at least
`one dose of rhuMAb VEGF.
`Demographic and baseline characteristics
`
`were summarized by descriptive statistics. The
`percentage of patients with an objective response
`or a decline in PSA level of 250% was calculated
`with 95% confidence intervals. Response dura(cid:173)
`tion, time to progression, and overall survival
`time were estimated using Kaplan-Meier meth(cid:173)
`odology. Group changes in quality-of-life mea(cid:173)
`sures, pain, and analgesic usage were assessed
`with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
`
`RESULTS
`Patient Characteristics
`A total of 15 patients were enrolled, all of whom
`were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. Patient
`characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The
`median age of patients was 71 years. Fourteen
`patients (93%) had bone metastases, and 8 pa(cid:173)
`tients (53%) had soft-tissue disease (lymph
`nodes in 7 patients, and liver metastases in 1
`patient). The median pretreatment PSA level was
`85 ng/ml (range 9.0-466 ng/ml), and all patients
`had an ECOG performance status score of 0 (n =
`
`TABLE I. Patient characteristics
`
`Characteristic
`
`Patients enrolled
`Median age (yr)
`ECOG performance status
`0
`
`Median laboratory values (range)
`PSA, ng/ml
`Alkaline Phosphatase, U/l
`LDH, U/I
`Hemoglobin, g/dl
`Patients with positive bone scan
`findings
`Patients with measurable disease
`Lymph node
`Liver
`Prior systemic therapy
`Antiandrogen
`Ketoconazole
`Aminoglutethimide
`Immunotherapy
`Chemotherapy
`
`No. of
`Patients(%)
`
`15
`71 (range 62-83)
`
`14 (93%)
`1 (7%)
`
`85 (9-466)
`87 (55-437)
`195 (136-434)
`12.2 (10.1-14.1)
`14 (93%)
`
`8 (53%)
`7
`
`14 (93%)
`3 (20%)
`2 (13%)
`3 (20%)
`0
`
`Hospira 1011
`6 of 9
`
`

`
`68
`
`The Prostate Journal, Volume 3, Number 2, April 2001
`
`14) or 1 (n == 1). Fourteen patients had received
`prior therapy with an antiandrogen (all of whom
`underwent antiandrogen withdrawal), 3 patients
`had received prior ketoconazole therapy, 2 pa(cid:173)
`tients had received prior aminoglutethimide
`therapy, and 3 patients had received prior im(cid:173)
`munotherapy with dendritic cells (n == 1) or
`granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating fac(cid:173)
`tor (n == 2). No patient had received prior che(cid:173)
`motherapy. The median number of rhuMAb
`VEGF doses received was 10 (range 5-13). How(cid:173)
`ever, seven patients (47%) received seven or
`fewer doses.
`
`Efficacy
`Efficacy was evaluated radiographically and by
`measuring serial changes in PSA levels. At Day
`70, none of the eight patients with measurable
`disease had experienced an objective complete or
`partial response. Although there were no un(cid:173)
`equivocal cases of tumor shrinkage, there were
`some mixed responses. One patient had a Week
`12 bone scan that showed a decrease or disap(cid:173)
`pearance of lesions in the cervical and thoracic
`spine but also showed a single new lesion in the
`left femur. Another patient had a Week 12 com(cid:173)
`puted axial tomography scan that demonstrated
`a 50% decrease in volume of the iliac and para(cid:173)
`aortic lymph nodes, but a bone scan showed
`multiple new areas of uptake. Both of these pa(cid:173)
`tients had accompanying increases in serum PSA
`level.
`No patient had a sustained decline in PSA
`level of >50%. Four patients (27%) had tran(cid:173)
`sient PSA level declines of <50% (range
`4-26%), while eight patients (53%) had an in(cid:173)
`crease in PSA level of <50% at Week 12. Three
`patients (20%) had a <50% increase in PSA
`level at Week 12.
`The median time to objective progression
`was 118 days (95% confidence interval 71-178
`days), and the median time to PSA progression
`was 57 days.
`
`discontinued therapy because of progressive he(cid:173)
`patic metastases. Approximately 4 weeks after
`the last infusion, he presented with fatigue and
`mental status changes, and was found to have a
`serum sodium level of 108 mEq/l. His condition
`improved with conservative therapy, and the hy(cid:173)
`ponatremia was felt to be due to disease progres(cid:173)
`sion. A second patient received five doses of
`rhuMAb VEGF, but then fatigue, anorexia, vom(cid:173)
`iting, and confusion developed, and the patient
`was found to have a scrum sodium level of 119
`mEq/l. He was treated with conservative mea(cid:173)
`sures, and his condition improved. The etiology
`of his hyponatremia was uncertain. Additional
`significant Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included hy(cid:173)
`perglycemia (n == 2), anemia (n == 1 ), and hyper(cid:173)
`kalemia (n == 3 ), all of which were thought to be
`unrelated to rhuMAb VEGF administration.
`
`Pharmacoldnetics
`rhuMAb VEGF serum concentrations were not
`measurable in any patient before treatment. Af(cid:173)
`ter the first dose, the mean peak and trough con -
`centrations of rhuMAb VEGF were 247 and 67
`pg/ml, respectively. Over time, the mean peak
`and trough concentrations increased. At Day 98,
`the mean peak and trough concentrations were
`450 and 180 pg/ml, respectively.
`Before rhuMAb VEGF administration, serum
`VEGF concentrations were not quantifiable (i.e.,
`<20 pg/ml) in 8 of the 15 patients. In patients in
`whom the serum VEGF level was measurable,
`baseline concentrations ranged from 24.3 to 178
`pg/ml. After rhuMAb VEGF administration, se(cid:173)
`rum VEGF concentrations were detectable and
`increased over time in all patients (mean maxi(cid:173)
`mum concentration 590 pg/ml). An examination
`of baseline rhuMAb VEGF and VEGF concentra(cid:173)
`tions, and of rhuMAb VEGF clearance and cen(cid:173)
`tral volume distributions, did not suggest a rela(cid:173)
`tionship between rhuMAb exposure and the rise
`in serum VEGF concentrations.
`
`Toxicity
`In general, treatment with rhuMAb VEGF was
`well-tolerated. No patient discontinued therapy
`due to adverse events, and there were no treat(cid:173)
`ment-related deaths. The most common adverse
`event was fatigue (60%), although this was rated
`at Grade 2 or less in all patients. Severe hypona(cid:173)
`tremia developed in two patients ( 13 % ) . The first
`patient received six doses of rhuMAb VEGF, but
`
`DISCUSSION
`The development of new therapies for patients
`with AIPC is critical, because existing treatments
`have not demonstrated a survival benefit. In this
`trial, we evaluated the efficacy of rhuMAb VEGF
`and did not find evidence of objective responses
`or meaningful PSA level declines. Four patients
`(27%) did have a decline in PSA level of< 50%,
`but this was not sustained, and the median time
`
`Hospira 1011
`7 of 9
`
`

`
`Reese et al.: Anti-VEGF Antibody in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer
`
`69
`
`to PSA progression was relatively short at 57
`days. While two patients had a possible mixed
`response as seen on radiographic studies, the se(cid:173)
`rum PSA level was increasing in both. Thus,
`there was no convincing evidence of a significant
`antitumor effect in this patient population.
`Patient selection would not appear to explain
`the results obtained in this trial. Fourteen of
`15 patients had an ECOG performance status
`score of 0, and the patients were not heavily pre(cid:173)
`treated (3 patients had received prior high-dose
`ketoconazole, 2 patients had received aminoglu(cid:173)
`tethimide, and 3 patients had received immuno(cid:173)
`therapy, while none had received chemo(cid:173)
`therapy). Furthermore, the median PSA level
`was comparable to that reported in large trials of
`patients with AIPC (14-16). However, eight pa(cid:173)
`tients ( 53 % ) did have soft-tissue (albeit largely
`nodal) metastases, and in some series this group
`of patients has been reported to have an inferior
`prognosis when compared to patients with bone(cid:173)
`only disease (17). Nevertheless, the patients in
`this study do not appear to have had exception(cid:173)
`ally advanced or resistant disease.
`The serum concentrations of rhuMAb VEGF
`observed in this trial were consistent with the
`levels predicted from animal-scaling models and
`pharmacokinetic analyses using comparable dos(cid:173)
`ing and schedules ( 18). In addition, the concen(cid:173)
`trations of antibody that were achieved were in
`the range of those reported to have antitumor
`efficacy in xenograft models (12). Thus, the fail(cid:173)
`ure to achieve target antibody concentrations is
`not likely to be an explanation for the lack of
`antitumor efficacy observed in this study.
`The toxicity of rhuMAb VEGF observed in
`this trial was, in general, modest. However, sig(cid:173)
`nificant hyponatremia developed in two pa(cid:173)
`tients. In the first, the hyponatremia was likely
`due to underlying disease progression, because
`the patient had extensive progressive visceral
`disease and had not received antibody therapy
`for 4 weeks before a low scrum sodium level
`developed. The second patient was actively re(cid:173)
`ceiving rhuMAb VEGF, however, and the anti(cid:173)
`body may have contributed to the development
`of hyponatremia. The mechanism by which this
`might occur is unknown, and hyponatremia was
`not observed in previous Phase I trials of the an(cid:173)
`tibody ( 13). In addition, animal studies of phar(cid:173)
`macokinetics did not demonstrate a significant
`accumulation of the antibody in the kidney ( 18).
`Despite the limited therapeutic activity of
`rhuMAb VEGF that was observed in this trial,
`further investigation of the antibody in patients
`
`with prostate cancer may be warranted. In par(cid:173)
`ticular, the use of the compound in earlier stages
`of the disease, when the tumor burden is mini(cid:173)
`mal, may yield a more potent antitumor re(cid:173)
`sponse. For example, the use of rhuMAb VEGF
`in patients with PSA progression (but no docu(cid:173)
`mented metastases) after primary local therapy
`would be reasonable, especially because macro(cid:173)
`molecules such as monoclonal antibodies may
`have restricted tumor penetration in clinically
`detectable metastatic lesions ( 19). In addition,
`combining rhuMAb VEGF with cytotoxic che(cid:173)
`motherapy agents may be a fruitful approach.
`The antibody has had potent interactions with
`cisplatin in one lung cancer xenograft model
`(20), and evaluating its efficacy in combination
`with effective anti-prostate cancer agents is logi(cid:173)
`cal. To determine whether rhuMAb has a role in
`the treatment of patients with advanced prostate
`cancer will require further clinical trials explor(cid:173)
`ing these hypotheses, because it is unlikely that
`the antibody has clinically relevant activity as a
`single agent in the treatment of metastatic AIPC.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`This research was sponsored in part by Gencn(cid:173)
`tcch, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA).
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Ferrara N. ( 1999) Role of vascular endothe(cid:173)
`lial growth factor in the regulation of angio(cid:173)
`genesis. Kidney Int. 56: 794-814.
`2. Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. ( 1997) The biol(cid:173)
`ogy of vascular endothelial growth factor.
`Endocr. Rev. 18: 4-25.
`3. Ferrer FA, Miller LJ, Lindquist R, et al.
`( 1999) Expression of vascular endothelial
`receptors in human prostate cancer. Urology
`54: 567-572.
`4. Ferrer FA, Miller LJ, Andrawis RI, ct al.
`( 1997) Vascular endothelial growth factor
`(VEGF) expression in human prostate can(cid:173)
`cer: In situ and in vitro expression of VEGF
`by human prostate cancer cells. J. Ural. 157:
`2329-2333.
`5. Duque JL, Loughlin KR, Adam RM, et al.
`( 1999) Plasma levels of vascular endothelial
`growth factor are increased in patients with
`metastatic prostate cancer. Urology 54:
`523-527.
`6. Melynk O, Simmerman M, Kim IO, et al.
`( 1999) Neutralizing anti-vascular endotheli-
`
`Hospira 1011
`8 of 9
`
`

`
`70
`
`The Prostate Journal, Volume 3, Number 2, April 2001
`
`al growth factor antibody inhibits further
`growth of established prostate cancer and
`metastases in a pre-clinical model. J. Urol.
`161: 960-963.
`7. Borgstrom P, Bourdon MA, Hillan KJ, et al.
`( 1998) Neutralizing anti-vascular endotheli(cid:173)
`al growth factor antibody completely inhib(cid:173)
`its angiogenesis and growth of human pros(cid:173)
`tate carcinoma micro tumors in vivo. Prostate
`35: 1-10.
`8. Kirschenbaum A, Wang J-P, Ren M, et al.
`( 1997) Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell
`growth factor suppresses the in vitro growth
`of human prostate tumors. Urol. Oncol. 3:
`3-10.
`9. Presta LG, Lahr SJ, Shields RL, et al. ( 1993)
`Humanization of an antibody directed
`against IgE. J. Immunol. 151: 2623-2632.
`10. Kim KJ, Li B, Winer J, et al. (1993) Inhibi(cid:173)
`tion of vascular endothelial growth factor(cid:173)
`induced angiogenesis suppresses tumor
`growth in vivo. Nature 362: 841-844.
`11. Warren RS, Yuan I-I, Matli MR, et al. (1995)
`Regulation by vascular endothelial growth
`factor of human colon cancer tumorigenesis
`in a mouse model of experimental liver me(cid:173)
`tastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 1789-1797.
`12. Mordenti J, Thomsen K, Licko V, Chen H,
`Meng YG, Ferrara N. ( 1999) Efficacy and
`concentration-response of murine anti(cid:173)
`VEGF monoclonal antibody in tumor(cid:173)
`bearing mice and extrapolation to humans.
`Toxicol. Pathol. 27: 14-21.
`13. Gordon MS, Margolin K Talpaz M, et al.
`(2001 ). Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic
`study of recombinant human anti-vascular
`endothelial growth factor in patients with
`advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 19: 851-856.
`14. Tannock I, Osoba D, Stockler M, et al. ( 1996)
`Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus
`prednisone or prednisone alone for symp-
`
`tomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer:
`A Canadian randomized study with pallia(cid:173)
`tive end points. J. Clin. Oncol. 14: 1756-1764.
`15. Kantoff P, Halabi S, Conaway M, et al.
`( 1999) Hydrocortisone with or without mi(cid:173)
`toxantrone in men with hormone-refractory
`prostate cancer: Results of the Cancer and
`Leukemia Group B 9182 study. J. Clin. Oncol.
`17: 2506-2513.
`16. Small EJ, Meyer M, Marshall ME, et al.
`(2000) Suramin therapy for patients with
`symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate
`cancer: Results of a randomized Phase Ill
`trial comparing suramin plus hydrocortisone
`to placebo plus hydrocortisone. J. Clin. Oncol.
`18: 1440-1450.
`17. Hussain M, Wolf M, Marshall E, Crawford
`ED, Eisenberger M. ( 1994) Effects of contin(cid:173)
`ued androgen-deprived therapy and other
`prognostic factors on response and survival
`in phase II chemotherapy trials for hor(cid:173)
`mone-refractory prostate cancer: A South(cid:173)
`west Oncology Group report. J. Clin. Oncol.
`12: 1868-1875.
`18. Lin YS, Nguyen C, Mendoza JL, et al. (1999)
`Preclinical pharmacokinetics, interspecies
`scaling, and tissue distribution of a human(cid:173)
`ized monoclonal antibody against vascular
`endothelial growth factor. J. Pharmacol. Exp.
`Ther. 288: 371-378.
`19. Netti PA, Hamberg LM, Babich JW, et al.
`( 1999) Enhancement of fluid filtration
`across tumor vessels: implication for delivery
`of macromolecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`96: 3137-3142.
`20. Kabbinavar F, Wong JT, Ayala RE, et al.
`(1995) The effect of antibody to vascular en(cid:173)
`dothelial growth factor and cisplatin on the
`growth of lung tumors in nude mi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket