`By: Peter J. McAndrews
`Thomas J. Wimbiscus
`Scott P. McBride
`Christopher M. Scharff
`McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
`500 W. Madison St., 34th Floor
`Chicago, IL 60661
`Tel: 312-775-8000
`Fax: 312-775-8100
`E-mail: pmcandrews@mcandrews-ip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`TQ DELTA, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01760
`Patent No. 9,094,268
`_____________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`IPR2016-01760
`U.S. Patent No. 9,094,268
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Patent Owner TQ Delta, LLC (“Patent
`
`Owner”) hereby files and serves the following objections to evidence that
`
`Petitioner Cisco Systems, Inc.’s (“Cisco”) submitted with its Reply. A chart listing
`
`Patent Owner’s objections and its basis for the objections is provided below.
`
`Exhibit
`Ex. 1012
`(Declaration of Dr.
`Sayfe Kiaei)
`
`
`Ex. 1016
`(U.S. Pat. No.
`5,909,463)
`
`Objection
`Relevance: ¶¶ 1-4, 7, 24, and 25 are not cited in the Reply
`and, therefore, are not relevant. F.R.E. 402; F.R.E. 403;
`37 C.F.R. § 42.61.
`
`¶¶ 4-14 and 16- 24 provide new evidence going to the
`alleged invalidity of the challenged claims. These
`sections are improperly introduced by the Reply. These
`sections are not relevant and are improper. See F.R.E.
`402; F.R.E 403; 37 C.F.R. § 42.23; 37 C.F.R. § 42.61; 37
`C.F.R. § 42.223; 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,767; 77 Fed.
`Reg. 48612, 48620.
`
`Relevance: Ex. 1016 provides new evidence going to the
`alleged invalidity of the challenged claims. This exhibit
`is improperly introduced by the Reply. This exhibit is not
`relevant and, thus, is improper. See F.R.E. 402; F.R.E
`403; 37 C.F.R. § 42.23; 37 C.F.R. § 42.61; 37 C.F.R. §
`42.223; 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,767; 77 Fed. Reg. 48612,
`48620.
`
`
`These objections are made, filed, and served within five business days of
`
`
`
`
`service of Petitioner’s Reply.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`IPR2016-01760
`U.S. Patent No. 9,094,268
`
`
`Dated: September 1, 2017
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Peter J. McAndrews/
`Peter J. McAndrews
`Registration No. 38,547
`McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
`500 West Madison Street, 34th Floor
`Chicago, Illinois 60661
`Office: (312) 775-8000
`Fax: (312) 775-8100
`Email: pmcandrews@mcandrews-ip.com
`
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`IPR2016-01760
`U.S. Patent No. 9,094,268
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owner’s Objections To Evidence Pursuant To 37 C.F.R. 42.64(b)(1) was
`
`served on September 1, 2017, via email to counsel for Petitioners at the following:
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Theodore M. Foster
`USPTO Reg. No. 57,456
`ipr.theo.foster@haynesboone.com
`Tel: (972) 739-8649
`Fax: (972) 692-9156
`
`Michael S. Parsons
`USPTO Reg. No. 58,767
`michael.parsons.ipr@haynesboone.com
`Tel: (972) 739-8611
`Fax: (972) 692-9003
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Peter J. McAndrews/
`Peter J. McAndrews
`Registration No. 38,547
`
`
`
`
`Lead Counsel
`David L. McCombs
`USPTO Reg. No. 32,271
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Haynes and Boone, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`
`Tel: (214) 651-5533
`Fax: (214) 200-0853
`
`
`
`
`
`MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Telephone: 312-775-8000
`
`
`Facsimile: 312-775-8100
`
`
`
`CUSTOMER NUMBER: 23446
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`