`
`EXPERT DECLARATION OF DOUGLAS A. CHRISSAN, Ph.D.
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01760
`Patent No. 9,094,268
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TQ Delta Exhibit 2005
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. TQ Delta, LLC
`
`IPR2016-01760
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
`
` My name is Douglas A. Chrissan. I have been engaged by TQ Delta,
`1.
`
`LLC in connection with IPR number 2016-01760 which relates to U.S. Pat. No.
`
`9,094,268 (“the ’268 patent”). In this declaration I provide my opinion that the
`
`challenged claims of the ’268 patent would not have been obvious in view of the
`
`references and grounds asserted by the Petitioner Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco” or
`
`“Petitioner”).
`
`II.
`
`PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
`
`A. Background and Experience
`
`
`2.
`
`I am presently a technical consultant in the areas of communications
`
`systems, multimedia systems, computer systems, and digital signal processing.
`
`
`3.
`
`I earned a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University
`
`of Southern California in 1988 and 1990, respectively, and a Ph.D. in Electrical
`
`Engineering from Stanford University in 1998.
`
`
`4.
`
`
`5.
`
`A copy of my current CV is attached as Ex. 2006.
`
`I was a Masters Fellow and Member of the Technical Staff at Hughes
`
`Aircraft Company in El Segundo, California, from 1988–1993. While at Hughes
`
`Aircraft, I designed and developed communication systems for commercial and
`
`military spacecraft, including for the MILSTAR satellite program.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Between 1992 and 1993, while at Hughes Aircraft Company, I
`
`designed and built a
`
`state-of-the-art, 800 megabit-per-second
`
`(Mbps)
`
`telecommunications modem for the NASA Lewis Research Center.
`
`
`7.
`
`From 1997–2003, I worked at 8x8, Inc., starting as a DSP software
`
`engineer in 1997, becoming a manager in 1998, a director in 1999, and Vice
`
`President of Engineering in 2000 (managing a team of approximately 60 engineers
`
`in the company’s microelectronics group). I played a key role in developing
`
`several
`
`semiconductor products used worldwide
`
`in multimedia
`
`and
`
`communications devices, mainly for video conferencing systems and Internet
`
`Protocol (“IP”) telephones. Some of these semiconductor products were in
`
`production more than ten years.
`
`
`8.
`
`From 2003–2007, I was a Systems Architect and Engineering
`
`Program Manager at Texas Instruments in the Digital Subscriber Line (“DSL”)
`
`product business unit. At Texas Instruments, I was directly involved in the
`
`architecture, design, development and production of multicarrier DSL modem
`
`products. My work specifically included architecting a multicarrier DSL
`
`semiconductor and software product and managing all aspects of its development
`
`from inception to production.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`
` My Ph.D. dissertation and related publications are in the fields of
`9.
`
`statistical signal processing and communication systems, and more specifically in
`
`the area of impulsive noise modeling for communication systems.
`
`
`10.
`
`In 1995 I was the instructor for the graduate Statistical Signal
`
`Processing class (EE278) in the Electrical Engineering department at Stanford
`
`University. Prior to teaching this class, I was a teaching assistant for ten different
`
`classes in signal processing and radio frequency electronics at Stanford.
`
`
`11.
`
`I have developed, and managed the development of, several
`
`successful semiconductor, software and systems products in the communications
`
`and multimedia fields. These products are listed in the attached curriculum vitae.
`
`B. Compensation
`
`
`12.
`
`I am being compensated for my time in this case at the rate of $250
`
`per hour (plus expenses) for analysis, depositions, and, if necessary, trial
`
`testimony. My compensation for this matter is not determined by or contingent on
`
`the outcome of this case.
`
`C. Materials Relied Upon
`
`
`13.
`
`In the course of preparing this expert declaration, I have considered
`
`the ’268 Patent, its file history, the Petition and its exhibits (including the
`
`Declaration of Dr. Kiaei), the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, the Board’s
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`Institution Decision, the transcript of the deposition of Dr. Kiaei, as well as any
`
`additional documents I cite or refer to in this declaration.
`
`III. THE BOARD’S INSTITUTION DECISION
`
`
`14.
`
`I understand the Board instituted inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 4,
`
`11, 12, 14, 16, and 18 of the ’268 patent as unpatentable over U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,956,323 (“Bowie”) in view of U.S. Patent No. 6,075,814 (“Yamano”).
`
`IV. BACKGROUND
`
` The ’268 patent discloses improvements to a multicarrier transceiver.
`15.
`
`Specifically, the ’268 patent describes inventions that allow a transceiver to enter a
`
`low power mode during which the transmitter portion of the transceiver does not
`
`transmit data but the receiver portion receives data, or that allow the transmitter
`
`portion of a transceiver to enter a low power mode while the receiver portion of the
`
`transceiver remains in a full power mode. In embodiments of the ‘268 patent the
`
`transceiver stores, while in the low power mode, parameters associated with the
`
`full power mode.
`
` In additional embodiments, the transceiver maintains
`
`synchronization with another transceiver while in the low power mode. To
`
`facilitate an understanding of the prior art and the inventions of the ’268 patent, a
`
`brief overview of multicarrier technology is set forth below.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`
`A. Overview Of Multicarrier Technology
`
` As explained in the ’268 patent, multicarrier transmission systems
`16.
`
`provide high speed data links between communication points. See Ex. 1001 at
`
`1:42–43. A Digital subscriber line (“DSL”) system is one example of a
`
`multicarrier transmission system that is used to provide high-speed data
`
`communication over the same subscriber loop that provides telephone service to a
`
`subscriber. See id. at 1:42–52.1, 2 Because the Petition specifically relies on the
`
`ADSL-based system of Bowie in its obviousness analysis, this overview is
`
`provided with reference to—and in the context of—DSL systems that operate in
`
`accordance with the American National Standard Institute’s ANSI T1.413-1995
`
`“American National Standard for Telecommunications – Network and Customer
`
`Installation Interfaces – Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Metallic
`
`Interface” (the “1995 ADSL Standard”). The transceivers in a DSL system
`
`communicate with each other by dividing the bandwidth of the communication
`
`1 The ’268 patent identifies ADSL (asynchronous digital subscriber line) and
`
`HDSL (High-Speed Digital Subscriber Line) as exemplary multicarrier protocols;
`
`this declaration references only ADSL.
`
`2 Yamano describes an alternative “single carrier” DSL technology, which will be
`
`discussed in sections of this declaration specific to Yamano.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`channel connecting the subscriber and a central office into separate subchannels, or
`
`carriers, each of limited bandwidth, operating in parallel with each other. See id. at
`
`1:53–57. The transceiver divides the data to be communicated over the DSL
`
`connection into groups of bits, allocates each group of bits to a respective carrier,
`
`and modulates each group of bits onto its respective carrier. See id. at 2:1–4. A
`
`transceiver that communicates data by modulating data onto multiple carriers
`
`simultaneously is referred to as a multicarrier transceiver.
`
` Each carrier has a phase characteristic and an amplitude characteristic.
`17.
`
`The phase characteristic varies over a range of 0 to 360 degrees (i.e., 0 to 2π
`
`radians); the amplitude characteristic varies over a range determined by the
`
`transmit power level of the subcarrier. The phase and/or amplitude of a carrier is
`
`modified based on the value of the group of bits allocated to the given carrier. The
`
`number of bits that are allocated to a carrier is referred to as the “bit loading” for
`
`that carrier. Modulation that changes the phase and/or amplitude of a subcarrier on
`
`a per-symbol basis is referred to as quadrature amplitude modulation (“QAM”).
`
`Modulating a multiplicity of subcarriers, as described above, is referred to as
`
`multicarrier modulation. The inventions claimed in the ’268 patent improve the
`
`operation of multicarrier transceivers.
`
` The
`18.
`
`transmission signal comprising
`
`the modulated carriers
`
`is
`
`transmitted for a fixed duration. This duration is referred to as the symbol period
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`or frame period, which for multicarrier DSL transceivers is typically a fraction of a
`
`millisecond. During a subsequent symbol period the transmission signal is
`
`generated by combining the same carriers, but modulated with the next set of data
`
`bits, and so on.
`
` A transceiver that receives this transmission signal “demodulates” the
`19.
`
`received signal to determine the amplitude and phase characteristic of each
`
`constituent subcarrier for each symbol period, and decodes these respective
`
`characteristics to reproduce original bit values.
`
`B. Overview of the ADSL Standard From the Relevant Time
`Frame
`
` Further discussion of ADSL system technology follows below with
`20.
`
`reference to the 1995 ADSL Standard. This would have been the standard in place
`
`for ADSL at the time Bowie and Yamano were filed and as of the priority date
`
`(January 26, 1998) of the ‘268 patent.
`
` The 1995 ADSL Standard defines the electrical characteristics of
`21.
`
`ADSL signals appearing at a network interface and the requirements for
`
`transmission of data between two communication endpoints. Ex. 2008 at 1.3 In
`
`
`3 Dr. Kiaei has confirmed that the 1995 ADSL Standard “specifies the minimum
`
`requirements for equipment implementing ADSL” in his declaration in the related
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`the context of ADSL and DSL generally, the communication endpoints are the
`
`central office (“CO”) modem and the customer premises equipment (“CPE”), also
`
`known as a subscriber modem. The CPE and CO modems are referred to as the
`
`ADSL transceiver unit, central office end (ATU-C), and ADSL transceiver unit,
`
`remote terminal end (ATU-R). See Ex. 2008 at p. 3. The ADSL standard
`
`contemplates that the ATU-C and the ATU-R exchange data over the two-wire
`
`twisted metallic cable pairs that are used to provide Plain Old Telephone Service
`
`(“POTS”).
`
`a.
`
`ADSL Data Communication
`
` The ATU-C and ATU-R exchange data over a communication
`22.
`
`channel whose frequencies do not overlap with the frequencies used to
`
`communicate voice. The ATU-C and ATU-R divide the frequency bandwidth of
`
`the communication channel into separate subchannels, or carriers, each of limited
`
`bandwidth, operating in parallel with each other. See, e.g., Ex. 1001 at 1:53–60. A
`
`set of carriers are allocated to communicate data from the ATU-R to the ATU-C
`
`(upstream channel) and a set of carriers are allocated to communicate data from the
`
`ATU-C to the ATU-R (downstream channel). See Ex. 1001 at 1:60–65. The
`
`IPR2016-01466. See IPR2016-01466, Cisco Systems, Inc. v. TQ Delta, LLC, Paper
`
`No. 1, Ex. 1003, at ¶¶ 76–77.
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`ATU-C divides the data to be communicated over the downstream channel into
`
`groups of bits, allocates each group of bits to a respective carrier of the
`
`downstream channel, and modulates each group of bits onto its respective carrier.
`
`See id. at 2:1–4. Similarly, the ATU-R divides the data to be communicated over
`
`the upstream channel into groups of bits, allocates each group of bits to a
`
`respective carrier of the upstream channel, and modulates each group of bits onto
`
`its respective carrier. Id. Specifically, each “group of bits is mapped into a vector
`
`defined by one of the points of a ‘constellation’ which specifies the allowable data
`
`points for transmission over that subchannel at a particular time.” Ex. 1001 at 2:4–
`
`9. All the modulated carriers of a channel, the upstream channel for example, are
`
`combined to generate a single transmission signal that is transmitted for a pre-
`
`defined time interval, i.e. the symbol period or frame. See Ex. 1001 at 2:11–16.
`
`The set of frequency-domain vectors used to modulate the carriers during a given
`
`symbol period, or equivalently the resulting time domain signal, is referred to as a
`
`DMT symbol. The same carriers are then modulated with the next group of data
`
`bits and the resulting transmission signal is transmitted in the subsequent symbol
`
`period (i.e., frame), and so on.
`
`
`23.
`
`In accordance with the ADSL Specification, every 69th symbol in each
`
`of the upstream and the downstream channels is generated by modulating the
`
`carriers with a pseudo-random sequence. See Ex. 2008 at p. 46–47. This symbol
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`transmitted during every 69th frame is referred to as the synchronization symbol.
`
`As in the ’268 patent, the ADSL standard refers to 68 contiguous DMT data
`
`symbols followed by a synchronization symbol as a superframe. Ex. 1001 at 5:9–
`
`17.
`
`
`24.
`
`In the 1995 ADSL Standard, the time period of a superframe is 17
`
`milliseconds, and
`
`the symbol period for each DMT symbol and
`
`the
`
`synchronization symbol is approximately 246 microseconds (i.e., 17 ms divided by
`
`69). See Ex. 2008 at p. 24. If there are no user data bits available to modulate the
`
`carriers during a symbol period, the carriers are modulated with idle data or
`
`information during that symbol period. See id. at §§ 5, 6 & 7 (describing that data
`
`bearer channels are transmitted continuously); Ex. 1006 at 1:46–52, 2:7–14.
`
`b.
`
`ADSL Synchronization
`
` The ADSL Standard requires that the ATU-C and ATU-R establish
`25.
`
`and maintain a timing relationship with each other after establishing a connection.
`
`To maintain the timing relationship between the ATU-C and ATU-R, carrier
`
`numbers 16 and 64 of the DMT symbols (upstream at 69 kHz and downstream at
`
`276 kHz, respectively) are not modulated with data or idle information, but are
`
`instead modulated with constant data. See Ex. 2008 at p. 46 (“Carrier #64 (f = 276
`
`kHz) shall be reserved for a pilot; that is b64 = 0 and g64 = 1. The data modulated
`
`onto the pilot sub-carrier shall be a constant {0,0}.”); and p. 58 (“Carrier #16 (f =
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`69.0 kHz) shall be reserved for a pilot; that is b16 = and g16 = 1. The data modulated
`
`onto the pilot sub-carrier shall be a constant {0,0}.”). Carrier numbers 16 and 64
`
`are referred to as the pilot tones. The frequency of the pilot tone corresponds to the
`
`frequency of the timing reference of the transmitting modem, an ATU-C for
`
`example. The receiving modem uses the frequency of the received pilot tone to
`
`adjust its local timing reference. Importantly, carriers 16 and 64 are continuously
`
`transmitted across the DMT symbols and synchronization frame regardless if data
`
`or idle information is being modulated onto the other carriers of the DMT symbols.
`
`Thus, the pilot tones are used to synchronize the frequency of the timing references
`
`of the transmitting modem with the frequency of the timing reference of the
`
`receiving modem. Also, as previously explained, the superframes are continuously
`
`transmitted, meaning that the pilot tones are continuously transmitted and received.
`
`Because the pilot tones are continuously transmitted, the timing references of a
`
`transmitting modem and a receiving modem that operate in accordance with the
`
`ADSL specifications are synchronized continuously with each other.
`
` The synchronization symbol that is transmitted once after every 68
`26.
`
`DMT symbols in turn is used to establish superframe boundaries and to correct for
`
`gross timing errors that result from micro-interruptions as a result of a temporary
`
`short-circuit, open circuit or severe line hit. See Ex. 2008 at pp. 24 and 46.
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`
`c.
`
`ADSL Initialization
`
` Before a multicarrier transceiver begins transmitting and receiving
`27.
`
`data, the transceiver undergoes an initialization process. See Ex. 1001 at 3:11–13.
`
`There are several distinct phases of initialization. The figure below reproduced
`
`from the 1995 ADSL Standard depicts the different phases of initialization for an
`
`ATU-C and an ATU-R. Set forth below the figure are descriptions of the different
`
`initialization steps for a DSL transceiver.
`
`
`
`Figure 1: Figure 29 from the 1995 ADSL Standard, Ex. 2008 at p. 87.
`
` As part of initialization, the transceivers exchange information to
`28.
`
`synchronize their timing, including synchronizing the frequencies of their
`
`respective clocks (i.e., “timing synchronization”). In the context of DSL systems,
`
`timing synchronization is accomplished as follows: one transceiver sends known
`
`signals to the other transceiver. The transmitting transceiver typically derives the
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`known signal from its clock. Therefore the frequency of this known signal is
`
`representative of the clock frequency of the transmitting transceiver. The other
`
`transceiver receives this known signal and adjusts the frequency of its clock based
`
`on the frequency of the received signal. The known signal thus indirectly allows
`
`the two transceivers to synchronize, or “lock,” the frequencies of their respective
`
`clocks. The timing synchronization procedure is also described in the ’268 patent.
`
`See Ex. 1001 at 5:42–55 and 5:59–67. In the 1995 ADSL Standard, this procedure
`
`is referred to as “loop timing” or “timing recovery.” See Ex. 2008 at § 12.2.2 (p.
`
`90) & 12.5.6 (p. 97).
`
` Subsequently, the initialization process continues with the transceivers
`29.
`
`determining certain characteristics of
`
`the wire
`
`loop
`
`that connects
`
`them.
`
`Attenuation, also known as loop loss, is an example of a loop characteristic.
`
`Attenuation is the reduction in power a signal experiences as it travels across a
`
`wire loop and is a function of different physical characteristics of the wire loop,
`
`such as its length, wire diameter and cable composition. The transceivers estimate
`
`attenuation by measuring the received power of a known signal and comparing that
`
`power to the known transmit power of the signal. The ratio of the signal power at
`
`the transmitter to the signal power at the receiver is the attenuation. (For example,
`
`a 100x reduction in power is an attenuation of 20 decibels, or 20 dB). Attenuation
`
`may be used to adjust transmit power, since less attenuation allows a smaller
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`transmit power to be used in order to meet a received power level requirement at a
`
`receiver. Loop background noise is another example of a loop characteristic.
`
` The initialization process typically continues with the transceivers
`30.
`
`performing other transceiver training and channel analysis tasks, which include
`
`determining equalization settings, echo canceller settings, and measuring signal to
`
`noise ratio on a per-subchannel basis. Signal to noise ratio (“SNR”) is a function
`
`of, inter alia, loop characteristics (e.g., line noise levels and line attenuation), and
`
`is used to determine transmission parameters that are used for transmission of data.
`
`If the line noise level is elevated, SNR will be lower, and vice versa. SNR then in
`
`turn is used to determine transmission parameters including transmission and
`
`reception data ranges, fine gain parameters, and bit allocation parameters. Ex.
`
`1001 at 3:14–25. Transmission parameters are specific to and conform to the
`
`communication protocol used for data transmission. The transceivers then go
`
`through the step of exchanging the transmission parameters determined during
`
`initialization.
`
` As explained in the ’268 patent, the initialization process of a DSL
`31.
`
`system can take tens of seconds. See id. at 3:27–29. Once the transceivers are
`
`initialized, the transceivers can transmit and receive data. Data may be sent in a
`
`continuous, synchronous stream of frames (also called symbols), which form
`
`superframes. A superframe includes frames of modulated data followed by a
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`modulated synchronization symbol. Id. at 5:9–18. For example, the superframe
`
`may include 68 data frames followed by a 69th frame that is a synchronization
`
`frame. Id. The synchronization frame may be used by a transceiver to determine
`
`the boundary of the superframe and maintain superframe alignment.
`
` A person of skill in the art (“POSITA”) would understand that
`32.
`
`initialization, as defined in the 1995 ADSL Standard, includes distinct, sequential
`
`steps of determining loop characteristics and determining bit and gain parameters
`
`based on the loop characteristics. The 1995 ADSL Standard states “[o]ne part of
`
`the ADSL initialization and training sequence estimates the loop characteristics to
`
`determine whether the number of bytes per Discrete MultiTone (DMT) frame
`
`required for the requested configuration's aggregate data rate [i.e., the necessary bit
`
`allocations] can be transmitted across the given loop.” Ex. 2008 at p. 9 (with
`
`bracketed comments inserted). The 1995 ADSL Standard further explains that
`
`“each receiver communicates to its far-end transmitter the number of bits and
`
`relative power levels [i.e., bit allocation and fine gain parameters] to be used on
`
`each DMT sub-carrier, as well as any messages and final data rates information.
`
`For highest performance these settings shall be based on the results [i.e., based in
`
`part on loop characteristics] obtained through the transceiver training and channel
`
`analysis procedures.” Id. at p. 87 (with bracketed comments inserted). Therefore,
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`the 1995 ADSL Standard distinguishes between loop characteristics of the loop
`
`and transmission parameters like bit allocation and fine gain parameters.
`
`C. The Inventions Of The ’268 Patent
`
` The ’268 Patent recognizes that prior art multicarrier transceivers
`33.
`
`were commonly maintained in the “on” state because of the desire by users to
`
`quickly resume Internet data communications after a period of inactivity and
`
`because of the lengthy initialization process required when returning from an “off”
`
`state. See Ex. 1001 at 2:60–65; 3:12–34. In this “on” state, both the transmitter
`
`and receiver portions of a prior art transceiver remained fully functional at all
`
`times. As a result, the multicarrier transceivers used a significant amount of power
`
`unnecessarily and had potentially reduced life spans. See Ex. 1001 at 2:60–3:1.
`
` The inventions of the challenged claims of the ’268 patent provide a
`34.
`
`unique low power mode that improved the operation of multicarrier transceivers.
`
`The inventions allow the multicarrier transceiver to enter a low power mode (and
`
`thus save power) wherein (1) the transmitter portion of the transceiver does not
`
`transmit data but the receiver portion of the transceiver receives data (challenged
`
`claims 1, 2, 4) or (2) the transmitter portion is in a low power mode while the
`
`receiver portion remains in a full power mode (challenged claims 11, 12, 14, 16,
`
`and 18). The inventive multicarrier transceiver further allows the transmitter to
`
`quickly return to full power mode by storing, while in the low power mode,
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`parameters associated with the full power mode (challenged claims 4 and 14) or to
`
`maintain synchronization with another transceiver while in the low power mode
`
`(challenged claims 2 and 12).
`
`
`35.
`
`In this way, the ’268 patent provides methods for operating a
`
`transceiver in a low power mode that saves power when the transmitter does not
`
`need to transmit data but the receiver needs to be able to receive data.
`
`D. Overview of the Cited Art
`
`
`36.
`
`I understand that Petitioner relies on two references in its proposed
`
`ground of invalidity of the ’268 patent claims – U.S. Pat. No. 5,956,323 (“Bowie”),
`
`and U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,814 (“Yamano”). A discussion of those two patents
`
`follows.
`
`1.
`
`Bowie
`
` Bowie describes an invention that is directed to a power conservation
`37.
`
`method for an asymmetric digital subscriber line (“ADSL”) system. Ex. 1005 at
`
`1:4–8, 1:23–25. As shown in Figure 1 of Bowie, reproduced below, the Bowie
`
`system uses ADSL units (e.g., modems) that are connected by a wire loop 120.
`
`Each ADSL unit includes signal processing electronics 111, data transmit circuitry
`
`112 and data receive circuitry 113 to send, receive, and process modulated data.
`
`See id. at 2:1–6, 3:2–5, 5:52–55. Each unit also includes a resume signal detector
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`115, which can be a 16 kHz AC signal detector 115 that employs conventional
`
`frequency detection techniques. See id. at 5:52–55.
`
`Figure 2, a reproduction of Fig. 1 from Bowie
`
`
`
`Id., Fig. 1.
`
` Bowie explains that, prior to data being sent between two ADSL units
`38.
`
`over the loop, loop characteristics must be determined and exchanged. See id. at
`
`4:64–5:4. He explains that loop characteristics include loop loss characteristics.
`
`Id. Bowie uses the terms “loop characteristics,” “electronic characteristics of the
`
`particular wire loop,” “loop transmission characteristics” and “loop characteristic
`
`parameters” interchangeably, and describes “loop loss characteristics” as an
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`example of these. See Ex. 1005 at 4:67–5:3, 5:23–25, 5:62–66, 6:25–33. Bowie
`
`refers to the exchange of loop characteristics as “handshaking.” Id. at 5:1–5.
`
` Bowie further teaches that when an ADSL unit receives a shut-down
`39.
`
`signal, it enters a low power mode in which the signal processing electronics, data
`
`transmit circuitry, and data receive circuitry all shut down. See id. at 5:17–28. The
`
`resume signal detector is the only circuitry that remains operational. See id.
`
`Bowie explains that loop 220 is “in an inactive state” when the unit enters the low
`
`power mode. Id. at 5:28–29. Bowie recognizes that the signal processing,
`
`transmitting, and receiving circuitry consume substantial amounts of power when
`
`transmitting and receiving “modulated data signals” and that consequently shutting
`
`down the transmitting, receiving, and signal processing circuitry, i.e., most of the
`
`transceiver’s circuitry, saves a significant amount of power—up to five watts per
`
`loop. See id. at 2:1–6.
`
` Bowie further teaches that, upon entering the low power mode, the
`40.
`
`ADSL units may “store[] in memory 117 characteristics of the loop 220 that were
`
`determined by… handshaking.” Id. at 5:17–28. Thus, Bowie teaches storing loop
`
`characteristics, such as attenuation, upon going into low power mode.
`
` Upon receipt of a “resume signal” at the resume signal detector 115,
`41.
`
`the Bowie unit “returns the signal processing 111, transmitting 112, and receiving
`
`113 circuitry to full power mode.” Id. at 5:60–62. The stored “loop transmission
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`characteristics… are retrieved from memory 117 and used to enable data
`
`transmission to resume quickly by reducing the time needed to determine loop
`
`transmission characteristics.” Id. at 5:62–66 (emphasis added). Thus, Bowie
`
`teaches using the stored loop characteristics as a starting point for determining the
`
`complete set of parameters that are necessary for returning to full data transmission
`
`upon coming out of the low power mode.
`
` Bowie teaches that one of the reasons that the loop characteristics
`42.
`
`have to be re-determined upon coming out of the low power mode is that the loop’s
`
`characteristics may have changed while the system was in the low power mode.
`
`See Ex. 1005 at 5:66–6:1 (“After resumption of full power mode, additional
`
`handshaking between ADSL units 232 and 242 may occur.”); id. at 6:37–41
`
`(“Handshaking
`
`information may be
`
`required where,
`
`for example,
`
`loop
`
`characteristics have changed due, for example, to temperature-dependent changes
`
`in loop resistance.”). Re-determining the loop characteristics after coming out of
`
`low power mode is required to ensure the transceivers “establish reliable data
`
`communication between the units.” Id. at 6:36–37.
`
`
`43.
`
`In my opinion, Bowie’s invention is limited to (1) a “resume signal
`
`generator” and a “resume signal detector” added onto an existing ADSL Standard
`
`transceiver, (2) a low-power mode that turns off the ADSL transceiver’s
`
`communication circuitry except for the “resume signal detector” (and the “resume
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`signal generator,” if and when it is time to return the other transceiver to normal
`
`operation) and (3) the concept of storing some information about the loop, such as
`
`attenuation, while in low power mode. As Bowie explains, storing loop
`
`information allows the Bowie unit to reduce the time needed to determine loop
`
`characteristics, which in turn are used to determine transmission parameters. This
`
`is a simplistic power saving scheme that does little to integrate with the existing
`
`internal functionality of an ADSL modem, and Bowie does very little to describe
`
`how any integration is to be performed by one of skill in the art. Therefore, it is
`
`substantially different from the ’268 patent regarding the implementation of a low
`
`power mode, as discussed further in this declaration.
`
` Bowie also does not teach maintaining synchronization when in the
`44.
`
`low power mode. This is consistent with Bowie’s teaching that all of the
`
`transceiver circuitry except for the resume signal detector is shut off in low power
`
`mode in order to save power.
`
`2.
`
`Yamano
`
` The disclosure in Yamano “relates to the reduction of the required
`45.
`
`amount of signal processing in a modulator/ demodulator (modem) which is
`
`transferring packet-based data or other information which is intermittent in nature
`
`on a communication channel.” See Ex. 1006 at 1:8–14.
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`Declaration of Douglas A. Chrissan, Ph.D.
`IPR2016-01760
`
`
` Yamano acknowledges that DSL modems may use either single
`46.
`
`carrier modulation, denoted “QAM” by Yamano, or multicarrier modulation
`
`(“MCM”), also known as Discrete Multi-Tone (“DMT”). However,
`
`the
`
`embodiments illustrated and described in Yamano, Figs. 2, 3 and 4, are single
`
`carrier DSL receivers. Although Yamano references multicarrier DSL receivers, it
`
`does so only in passing to recognize that multicarrier receivers are different from
`
`the described single carrier receivers. See Ex. 1006 at 14:59–62 (“the receiver
`
`circuit used in connection with an MCM signalling (sic) protocol (hereinafter an
`
`MCM receiver circuit) is different from receiver circuit 400”). However, Yamano
`
`falls far short of enabling a POSITA to modify a prior art DMT DSL modem to
`
`implement Yamano’s invention. This was acknowledged by Dr. Kiaei during his
`
`deposition. See Ex. 2004 at 173:18–19 (“In Yamano, it doesn't go into all the
`
`details and the specifics”). To the extent Yamano suggests applicability of its
`
`teachings to an ADSL system, as I explain later the teachings are incompatible
`
`with multicarrier DSL and specifically with the 1995 ADSL Standard and the
`
`ADSL-based system of Bowie. Setting aside that Yamano’s embodiments are
`
`incompatible with the 1995 ADSL Standard and Bowie, I provide below an
`
`exposition of the features of Yamano.
`
`
`47.
`
`In its discussion of “Related Art,” Yamano explains that conventional
`
`DSL modems transport dat