throbber
Rich Seifert, continued
`
`Legalcases
`1994-95
`
`1996-98
`
`1998
`
`1998
`
`1998
`
`1998-00
`
`1999
`
`1999
`
`2000
`
`2000
`
`2000-01
`
`2000
`
`2001
`
`3Com v. SynOptics Communications
`Workman, Nydegger 8: Seeley (Salt Lake City, UT) for Plaintiff 3Com
`Patent litigation relating to secure Ethernet repeater technology. Provided expert technology
`consultation. Case settled before deposition or trial.
`Datapoint v. Intel, et. al.
`Kenyon and Kenyon (Washington, DC) for Defendant Intel
`Patent litigation relating to multi-speed Local Area Networks, Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, LAN
`Bridges, and Auto-Negotiation. Provided expert consultation and testimony at Markman
`hearing. Summary judgment for client Intel (non-infringement); affirmed on appeal.
`Bay Networks
`Provided expert opinion on the classification of networking products for the Harmonized Tariff
`Schedule of the European Union (World Customs Organization).
`Level One v. SEEQ
`Fish 8: Richardson (Menlo Park, CA) for Plaintiff Level One
`Patent litigation relating to Fast Ethernet Auto-Negotiation and IEEE standards. Provided expert
`consultation, expert report and deposition testimony. Case settled prior to trial.
`Ashraf Dahod v. LANCity Communications (Bay Networks)
`Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin 8: Hayes (Boston, MA) for Defendant Bay Networks
`Patent litigation relating to broadband metropolitan-area network equipment. Provided expert
`consultation, expert report, and deposition testimony. Trial verdict for client Bay Networks.
`Accton Technology v. Microlinear
`Morgan, Miller 8: Blair (Walnut Creek, CA) for Plaintiff Accton
`Liability litigation relating to defective Ethernet transceiver components. Provided expert
`consultation. Case settled before trial.
`
`Texas Instruments v. Hyundai
`Jones, Day, Reavis 8: Pogue (Dallas, TX) for Plaintiff Texas Instruments
`Patent litigation relating to Fast Ethernet, signal encoding, and IEEE standards. Provided expert
`consultation and expert report. Case settled before trial (in excess of $1B for Plaintiff).
`Lucent v. Cisco Systems
`Weil, Gotshal 8: Manges (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendant Cisco Systems
`Patent litigation relating to Virtual LANs, internetworking, etc. (many patents at issue). Provided
`expert consultation. Case settled before trial.
`Nortel Networks v. Optical Networks, Inc.
`Fenwick 8: West (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendant Optical Networks
`Patent litigation relating to redundant fiber ring technology. Provided expert technology
`consultation. Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Accton Technology V. Valor Electronics
`Morgan, Miller 8: Blair (Walnut Creek, CA) for Plaintiff Accton
`Liability litigation relating to defective Ethernet power converter modules. Provided expert
`consultation and deposition testimony. Case settled before trial.
`II1tel v. Broadcom
`
`Superior Court of California (Santa Clara County)
`Litigation relating to potential disclosure of trade secrets as a result of hiring employees from a
`competitor. Served as Special Master to the Court, pursuant to a Preliminary Injunction ruling.
`Acted as a neutral, technically-knowledgeable third party to monitor work of affected employees
`to see if trade secret information was being misappropriated. Technologies at issue included
`Gigabit Ethernet and LAN Switch semiconductors. Provided report to court; case subsequently
`settled before trial.
`Grumman v. 3Com
`
`Workman, Nydegger 8: Seeley (Salt Lake City, UT) for Defendant 3Com
`Patent litigation relating to internetworking systems architecture. Provided expert consultation.
`Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Intel Corporation
`Provided expert consultation to in-house counsel regarding entire portfolio of network-related
`patents.
`
`Feb 2015
`
`0052
`
`it 1029
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1029
`0052
`
`

`

`2001-04
`
`2001-02
`
`2002-04
`
`2002-05
`
`2005
`
`2005
`
`2005-07
`
`2005-
`
`2005-07
`
`2006-07
`
`2006-07
`
`2006-07
`
`2006
`
`2006-
`
`Rich Seifert, continued
`
`Nortel v. Foundry Networks
`Orrick, Herrington 8: Sutcliffe (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendant Foundry Networks
`Patent litigation relating to design of bridges, switches, and routers. Provided expert consultation
`and expert reports. Case settled before trial.
`IBM V. Pluris
`
`Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati (Palo Alto, CA) for Defendant Pluris
`Patent litigation relating to a variety of internetworking technologies. Provided expert
`consultation. Case rendered moot by dissolution of Pluris.
`Connectel v. NMS
`
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo (Boston, MA) for Defendant NMS
`Patent litigation relating to Internet fax technology. Provided expert consultation, expert report,
`deposition testimony and testimony at Markman hearing. Case settled before trial.
`Chrimar Systems v. Cisco Systems
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendant Cisco Systems
`Patent litigation relating to providing power to Ethernet devices over a communications link.
`Provided expert consultation, expert reports and affidavits, deposition and hearing testimony.
`Summary judgment for client Cisco (both non-infringement and invalidity of asserted patent
`claim).
`Connectel v. Cisco Systems
`Kirkland 8: Ellis (San Francisco, CA) for Defendant Cisco Systems
`Patent litigation relating to Internet fax technology. Provided expert consultation. Case settled
`before trial.
`Micrel v. Deloitte
`
`Bingham McCutcheon (East Palo Alto, CA) for Defendant Deloitte
`Accounting malpractice dispute relating to network semiconductor devices. Provided expert
`consultation. Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Negotiated Data Solutions v. Dell Computer
`Greenberg Traurig (Costa Mesa, CA) and Paul Hastings (Palo Alto, CA) for Defendant Dell
`Patent litigation relating to Ethernet Auto-Negotiation. Provided expert consultation. Consulting
`assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Marvell v. Broadcom
`
`O’Melveny 8: Myers (San Francisco, CA) for Defendant Broadcom
`Trade secret dispute relating to network semiconductor devices. Provided expert consultation.
`Case stayed indefinitely due to criminal prosecution of employee involved.
`L3 Communications V. Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc.
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky 8: Popeo (Boston, MA) for Defendant Reveal
`Patent litigation relating to networked airport baggage scanning equipment. Provided expert
`consultation. Case settled before trial.
`
`Network-1 v. D-Link Systems
`Christine Yang (Fountain Valley, CA) for Defendant D-Link Systems
`Patent litigation relating to providing power to Ethernet devices over a communications link.
`Provided expert consultation, expert report, deposition testimony. Case settled before trial.
`Accton Technology v. Centillium Communications
`Morgan, Miller &: Blair (Walnut Creek, CA) for Plaintiff Accton.
`Liability litigation relating to defective network routing semiconductors. Provided expert
`consultation, declarations. Case settled before trial.
`Alcatel v. Foundry Networks
`Orrick, Herrington 8: Sutcliffe (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendant Foundry Networks
`Patent litigation relating to user authentication for network switches. Provided expert
`consultation. Case settled before trial.
`
`Antor Media v. Palm Computing
`Quinn Emanuel (Redwood Shores, CA) for Defendant Palm Computing
`Patent litigation relating to method for data communications. Provided expert consultation. Case
`settled before trial.
`
`Enterasys Networks v. Foundry Networks
`Orrick, Herrington 8: Sutcliffe (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendant Foundry Networks
`Patent litigation relating to Virtual LAN implementation in network switches. Provided expert
`consultation. Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`
`Feb 2015
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1029
`0053
`
`

`

`2006-10
`
`2007
`
`2008-09
`
`2008
`
`2008-10
`
`2008-09
`
`2008-
`
`2009
`
`2009
`
`2009
`
`2009-
`
`2009-10
`
`2010
`
`Rich Seifert, continued
`
`Chrimar Systems v. PowerDSine, Chrimar Systems v. D-Link Systems
`Orrick, Herrington 8: Sutcliffe (Menlo Park, CA) for Defendants PowerDSine and D-Link.
`Patent litigation relating to providing power to Ethernet devices over a communications link.
`Provided expert consultation, expert reports, declarations, deposition and hearing testimony.
`Case settled before trial.
`3Com v. Realtek
`
`Simpson Thacher (New York, NY) for Plaintiff 3Com
`Patent litigation relating to implementation of host interface in Ethernet and FDDI network
`products. Provided expert consultation. Consulting assignment completed during pendency of
`case.
`
`Commil v. Cisco Systems
`Simpson Thacher (Palo Alto, CA) for Defendant Cisco Systems
`Patent litigation relating to partitioning of Wireless LAN devices. Provided expert consultation.
`Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Epson v. Advanced Micro Devices
`Townsend, Townsend and Crew (San Francisco, CA) for Plaintiff / Cross-Defendant Epson.
`Patent negotiation relating to Ethernet Auto-Negotiation, Wake-on LAN, Full Duplex Ethernet
`(many patents at issue). Provided expert consultation.
`Network Appliance v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.
`DLA Piper (Washington, DC) for Defendant Sun Microsystems
`Patent litigation relating to Ethernet Link Aggregation. Provided expert consultation. Case settled
`before trial.
`Fenner v. 3Com, et. al.
`Finnegan, Henderson (Palo Alto, CA) for Defendants D-Link, Extreme Networks, Netgear, ZyXel
`Vasquez, Benisek 8: Lindgren (Lafayette, CA) for Defendants SMC, Enterasys, et. al.
`Patent litigation relating to MAC bridging, IP routing, and address lookup algorithms. Provided
`expert consultation, expert report. Case settled before trial.
`Network-1 v. Enterasys, et. al.
`Vasquez, Benisek 8: Lindgren (Lafayette, CA) for Enterasys and Ioint Defense
`Follow-on case from prior Network-1 v. D-Link, same patent pursued against additional
`defendants following earlier settlement. Provided expert consultation. Consulting assignment
`completed during pendency of case.
`Fenner v. Dell, et. al.
`Weil, Gotshal 8: Manges (New York, NY) for Defendant Dell Computer
`Goodwin, Procter (Washington, DC) for Defendant Hewlett-Packard
`Follow-on case from prior Fenner v. 3Com litigation relating to MAC bridging, IP routing, and
`address lookup algorithms. Provided expert consultation. Consulting assignment completed
`during pendency of case.
`FINoc v. D-Link
`
`Law Offices of Christine Yang for Defendant D-Link
`Patent litigation relating to wireless DSL communications systems. Provided expert consultation.
`Case settled before trial.
`United States v. Ge
`
`Swanson 8: McNamara (San Francisco, CA) for Defendant Yuefei Ge
`Criminal prosecution relating to economic espionage and theft of trade secrets. Provided expert
`consultation. Defendant acquitted on two counts, mistrial (jury deadlock) on three counts.
`Zircon v. Stanley
`Haynes and Boone (San Jose, CA) for Plaintiff Zircon
`Patent litigation relating to algorithms for electronic stud finder. Provided expert consultation.
`Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Optimum Path v. SMC Networks
`Vasquez, Benisek 8: Lindgren (Lafayette, CA) for Defendant SMC Networks
`Patent litigation relating to wireless routers. Provided expert consultation. Consulting assignment
`completed during pendency of case.
`Eon V. Verizon
`
`Simpson Thacher (New York, NY) for Defendant Verizon
`Patent litigation relating to interactive video networks. Provided expert consultation, expert
`reports, deposition testimony. Case settled before trial.
`
`Feb 2015
`
`0054
`
`it 1029
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1029
`0054
`
`

`

`2010
`
`2011-
`
`2011-
`
`2011
`
`2011
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`2012-
`
`2012-13
`
`2012-13
`
`2013
`
`2013-
`
`2013-
`
`2014
`
`2014-
`
`2014-
`
`Rich Seifert, continued
`
`SynQor, Inc. v. Lineage Power, et. al.
`Vasquez, Benisek & Lindgren (Lafayette, CA) for Defendants Lineage Power and Cherokee Power
`Patent litigation relating to switching power systems architecture. Provided expert consultation.
`Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Eon V. D-Link
`
`Law Offices of Christine Yang for Defendant D-Link
`Patent litigation relating to interactive video networks. Provided expert consultation. Consulting
`assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Fujitsu v. D-Link
`Law Offices of Christine Yang for Defendant D-Link
`Patent litigafion relating to PCMCIA interface adapters. Provided expert consultation. Consulting
`assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Pepper Hamilton LLP
`Evaluated patent portfolio for client considering acquisition of IP.
`VirnetX v. Siemens
`
`Pepper Hamilton LLP for Defendant Siemens
`Patent litigation relating to secure communications systems. Provided expert consultation.
`Consulting assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Chalumeau V. Enterasys, et. al.
`Vasquez, Benisek 8: Lindgren for joint defense.
`Patent litigation relating to Power-over-Ethernet. Provided expert consultation. Consulting
`assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Chrimar v. Avaya, et. al.
`Crowell 6: Moring for Defendant Avaya
`ITC action relating to Power-over-Ethernet. Provided expert consulting. Consulting assignment
`completed during pendency of case.
`Eon v. FLO TV
`
`Simpson Thacher for Defendant FLO TV
`Patent litigation relating to interactive video networks. Provided expert consultation. Case
`pending.
`Eon v. Novatel, et. al.
`K&L Gates for Defendants Novatel and Enfora.
`
`Patent litigation relating to interactive video networks. Provided expert consultation, expert
`report, and deposition testimony. Case settled before trial.
`USEI v. Digi
`Robins, Kaplan, lVIiller 8: Ciresi for Defendant Digi, Inc.
`Patent litigation relating to Ethernet interface design. Provided expert consultation. Consulting
`assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Eon v. Silver Spring Networks
`SNR Denton for Defendant Silver Spring Networks.
`Patent litigation relating to wireless telemetry systems. Provided expert consultation. Consulting
`assignment completed during pendency of case.
`Fenner v. Iuniper Networks
`lrell 8: Manella, LLP for Defendant Juniper Networks. Provided expert consultation. Case
`pending.
`USEI v. Xerox Corp.
`Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi for Defendant Xerox Corp. Provided expert consultation, expert
`report. Case settled before trial.
`USEI v. Apple Corp.
`Williams Morgan for Defendant Apple Corp. Provided expert consultation, expert reports.
`Summary judgment in favor of Defendant Apple.
`Chrimar v. AMX, et al.
`McDermott, Will & Emery for Defendant AMX. Provided expert consultation. Case pending.
`Net Navigation Systems LLC v. Extreme Networks
`Vasquez, Benisek, and Lindgren for Defendant Extreme. Provided expert consultation. Case
`pending.
`
`Feb 2015
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1029
`0055
`
`

`

`EXHIBIT B
`ADDITIONAL MATERIALS CONSIDERED
`
`The following materials were considered in producing this report.
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,702,760, issued Dec. 2, 2014 (including Prosecution History).
`[’O12 Patent]
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 8,942,107, issued Ian. 27, 2015 (including Prosecution History).
`[’O12 Patent]
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 9,019,838, issued Apr. 28, 2015 (including Prosecution History).
`[’O12 Patent]
`
`Harry Newton, Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 18”‘ ed., CMP Books, 2002.
`
`Leonard Crow, Learning Electricity Fundamentals, Howard Sams, 1957
`[hereinafter ”Crow”]
`
`Declaration of Les Baxter, Dec. 17, 2015 [hereinafter ”Baxter Dec1.”].
`
`Microchip Corp., PIC12C5XX Family Datasheet.
`
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1029
`0056
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket