throbber
IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`If the MAU is a link or fiber type (FOIRL, 10BASE-T, IOBASE-F), then this is equivalent to the
`link test fail state/low light function. For an AUI , 10BASE2, l0BASE5, or l0BROAD36 MAU,
`this indicates whether or not loopback is detected on the DI circuit. The Value ofthis attribute persists
`between packets for MAU types AUI, l0BASE5, l0BASE2, l0BROAD36, and 10BASE-FP.
`At power-up or following a reset, the value ofthis attribute will be “unknown” for AUI, l0BASE5 ,
`l0BASE2, l0BROAD36, and 10BASE-FP MAUs. For these MAUs loopback will be tested on
`each transmission during which no collision is detected. If D1 is receiving input when DO returns
`to IDL after a transmission and there has been no collision during the transmission, then loopback
`will be detected. The value of this attribute will only change during noncollided transmissions for
`AUI, IOBASE2, 10BASE5, l0BROAD36, and 10BASE-FP MAUs.
`For l00BASE-T4, IOOBASE-TX, and 100BASE-FX the enumerations match the states within the
`respective link integrity state diagrams, figure 23-12 and 24-15. Any MAU that implements
`management of clause 28 Auto-Negotiation will map remote fault indication to MediaAvailable
`remote fault.
`
`The enumeration “remote fault” applies to IOBASE-FB, 100BASE—X, far-end fault indication and
`non-specified remote faults from a system running clause 28 Auto-Negotiation. The enumerations
`“remote jabber,” “remote link loss,” or “remote test” should be used instead of “remote fault” where
`the reason for remote fault is identified in the remote signaling protocol.
`Where a clause 22 MII is present, a logic one in the remote fault bit (22.2.4.2.9) maps to the
`enumeration “remote fault,” a logic zero in the link status bit (22.2.4.2.11) maps to the enumeration
`“not available.” The enumeration “not available” takes precedence over “remote fault”;
`
`30.5.1.1 .5 aLoseMediaCounter
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`Generalized nonresettable counter. This counter has a maximum increment rate of 10 counts per
`second
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`Counts the number of times that the MAU leaves
`
`MediaAvailState “available.” Mandatory for MAU type “AUI,” optional for all others.;
`
`30.5.1.1.6 aJabber
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`A SEQUENCE of two indications. The first, IabberFlag, consists of an ENUMERATED value list
`that has the following entries:
`other
`undefined
`
`initializing, true state not yet known
`unknown
`state is true or normal
`normal
`state is false, fault, or abnormal
`fault
`The second, jabberCounter, is a generalized nonresettable counter. This counter has a maximum
`increment rate of 40 counts per second
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`If the MAU is in the JABBER state, the jabberFlag portion of the attribute is set to the “fault”
`value. The jabberCounter portion of the attribute is incremented each time the flag is set to the
`“fault” value. This attribute returns the value “other” for type AUI. Note that this counter will not
`increment for a 100 Mb/s PHY, as there is no defined JABBER state.;
`
`This is an3Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`0346
`
`t 1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0346
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`CSMA/CD
`
`30.5.1.1 .7 aMAUAdminState
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`An ENUIVEERATED value list that has the following entries:
`other
`undefined
`
`initializing, true state not yet known
`unknown
`powered and connected
`operational
`inactive but on
`standby
`similar to power down
`shutdown
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`A MAU in management state “standby” forces DI and CI to idle and the media transmitter to idle
`or fault, if supported. The management state “standby” only applies to link type MAUs. The state
`of MediaAvailable is unaffected. A MAU or AUI in the management state “shutdown” assumes
`the same condition on DI, CI and the media transmitter as if it were powered down or not
`connected. For an AUI, this management state will remove power from the AUI. The MAU may
`return the value “undefined” for Jabber and MediaAvailable attributes when it is in this
`
`management state. A MAU in the management state “operational” is fully functional, and operates
`and passes signals to its attached DTE or repeater port in accordance with its specification.;
`
`30.5.1.1.8 aBbMAUXmitRcvSplitType
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`An ENUMERATED value list that has the following entries:
`other
`undefined
`
`single-cable system
`single
`dual-cable system, offset normally zero
`dual
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Returns a value that indicates the type of frequency multiplexing/cabling system used to separate
`the transmit and receive paths for the IOBROAD36 MAU. All other types return “undefined”;
`
`30.5.1.1.9 aBroadbandFrequencies
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`A SEQUENCE of two instances of the type INTEGER.
`
`The first INTEGER represents the Transmitter Carrier Frequency. The value of its INTEGER
`represents the frequency of the carrier divided by 250 kHz.
`
`The second INTEGER represents the Translation Offset Frequency. The value of its INTEGER
`represents the frequency of the offset divided by 250 kHz
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Returns a value that indicates the transmit carrier frequency and translation offset frequency in
`l\/H-Iz/4 for the IOBROAD36 MAU. This allows the frequencies to be defined to a resolution of
`250 kHz.;
`
`30.5.1.1 .10 aFalseCarriers
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`Generalized nonresettable counter. This counter has a maximum increment rate of 160 000 counts
`
`per second under maximum network load, and 10 counts per second under zero network load, for
`100 Mb/s implementations
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanggrd.
`
`0347
`
`t 1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0347
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`A count of the number of false carrier events during IDLE in IOOBASE-X links. This counter does
`not increment at the symbol rate. It can increment after a valid carrier completion at a maximum
`rate of once per 100 ms until the next carrier event.;
`
`30.5.1.2 MAU actions
`
`30.5.1.2.1 acResetMAU
`
`ACTION
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`None required
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Resets the MAU in the same manner as would a power-off, power-on cycle of at least 0.5 s
`duration. During the 0.5 s DO, DI, and CI should be idle.;
`
`30.5.1 .2.2 acMAUAdminControl
`
`ACTION
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`The same as used for aMAUAdminState
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Executing an acMAUAdminControl action causes the MAU to assume the aMAUAdminState
`attribute value of one of the defined valid management states for control input. The valid inputs
`are “standby,” “operational,” and “shutdown” state (see the behaviour definition
`bMAUAdminState for the description of each of these states) except that a “standby” action to a
`mixing type MAU or an AUI will cause the MAU to enter the “shutdown” management state.;
`
`30.5.1.3 MAU notifications
`
`30.5.1.3.1 nJabber
`
`NOTIFICATION
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`The same as used for alabber
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`The notification is sent whenever a managed MAU enters the JABBER state.;
`
`30.6 Management for link Auto-Negotiation
`
`30.6.1 Auto-Negotiation managed object class
`
`This subclause formally defines the behaviours for the oAuto—Negotiation managed object class, attributes,
`actions, and notifications.
`
`This is an3Qg'chive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`0348
`
`1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0348
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`CSMA/CD
`
`30.6.1.1 Auto-Negotiation attributes
`
`30.6.1.1.1 aAutoNeglD
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`INTEGER
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`The value of aAutoNeglD is assigned so as to uniquely identify an Auto—Negotiation managed
`object among the subordinate managed objects of the containing object;
`
`30.6.1.1.2 aAutoNegAdminState
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`An ENUMERATED VALUE that has one of the following entries:
`enabled
`disabled
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`An interface which has Auto—Negotiation signaling ability will be enabled to do so when this
`attribute is in the enabled state. If disabled then the interface will act as it would if it had no Auto-
`
`Negotiation signaling. Under these conditions it will immediately be forced to the states indicated
`by a write to the attribute aMAUType.;
`
`30.6.1.1.3 aAutoNegRemoteSignaling
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`An ENUMERATED VALUE that has one of the following entries:
`detected
`notdetected
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`The value indicates whether the remote end of the link is operating Auto—Negotiation signaling or
`not. It shall take the value detected if, during the previous link negotiation, FLP Bursts were
`received fiom the remote end.;
`
`30.6.1.1 .4 aAutoNegAutoConfig
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`An ENUMERATED VALUE that has one of the following entries:
`other
`
`configuring
`complete
`disabled
`
`parallel detect fail
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Indicates whether Auto—Negotiation signaling is in progress or has completed. The enumeration
`“parallel detect fail” maps to a failure in parallel detection as defined in 28.2.3.1.;
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanggrd.
`
`0349
`
`t 1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0349
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`30.6.1.1 .5 aAutoNegLocalTechnologyAbility
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`A SEQUENCE that meets the requirements of the description below:
`global
`Reserved for future use
`other
`Undefined
`
`unknown
`10BASE-T
`
`Initializing, true ability not yet known
`10BASE-T as defined in clause 14
`
`IOBASE-TFD
`100BASE-TX
`
`Full-duplex 10BASE-T
`100BASE-TX as defined in clause 25
`
`l00BASE-TXFD Full-duplex 100BASE-TX
`100BASE-T4
`100BASE-T4 as defined in clause 23
`isoethemet
`IEEE Std 802.9 ISLAN—16T
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`This indicates the technology ability of the local hardware, as defined in clause 28.;
`
`30.6.1.1.6 aAutoNegAdvertisedTechnologyAbility
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`Same as aAutoNegLocalTechnologyAbility
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`This GET-SET attribute maps to the Technology Ability Field ofthe Auto—Negotiation Link Code
`Word, defined in clause 28. A SET operation to a value not available in
`aAutoNegLocalTechnologyAbility will be rejected. A successful set operation will result in
`immediate link renegotiation if aAutoNegAdrninState is enabled.
`
`NOTE—This will in every case cause temporary link loss during link renegotiation. If set to a value incom-
`patible with aAutoNegReceivedTechno1ogyAbility, link negotiation will not be successful and will cause
`permanent link loss.;
`
`30.6.1.1 .7 aAutoNegReceivedTechnologyAbility
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`Same as aAutoNegLocalTechnologyAbility
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Indicates the advertised technology ability of the remote hardware. Maps to the Technology
`Ability Field of the last received Auto—Negotiation Link Code Word(s), defined in clause 28.;
`
`30.6.1.1 .8 aAutoNegLocalSelectorAbility
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`A SEQUENCE that meets the requirements of the description below:
`other
`Undefined
`ethemet
`IEEE Std 802.3
`isoethemet
`IEEE Std 802.9 ISLAN—16T
`
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`This indicates the value of the selector field of the local hardware. Selector field is defined in
`
`28.2. 1 .2. l. The enumeration of the Selector Field indicates the standard that defines the remaining
`encodings for Auto—Negotiation using that value of enumeration. Additional future enurnerations
`may be assigned to this attribute through the 802.3 maintenance process.;
`
`This is ar13Qg'chive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0350
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`30.6.1.1 .9 aAutoNegAdvertisedSelectorAbility
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`Same as aAutoNegLoca1Se1ectorAbility
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`This GET-SET attribute maps to the Message Selector Field of the Auto-Negotiation Link Code
`Word, defined in clause 28. A SET operation to a value not available in
`aAutoNegLocalSelectorAbility will be rejected. A successful set operation will result in
`immediate link renegotiation if aAutoNegAd1ninState is enabled.
`
`NOTE—'I‘his will in every case cause temporary li11k loss during link renegotiation. If set to a value incom-
`patible with aAutoNegReceivedSelectorAbility, link negotiation will not be successful and will cause per-
`manent link loss.;
`
`30.6.1.1 .1 0 aAutoNegReceivedSelectorAbility
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`Same as aAutoNegLocalSelectorAbility
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Indicates the advertised message transmission ability of the remote hardware. Maps to the Message
`Selector Field of the last received Auto-Negotiation Link Code Word, defined in clause 28.;
`
`30.6.1.2 Auto-Negotiation actions
`
`30.6.1 .2.1 acAutoNegRestartAutoConfig
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`None required
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`Forces Auto-Negotiation to begin link renegotiation. Has no effect if Auto-Negotiation signaling
`is disabled.;
`
`30.6.1.2.2 acAutoNegAdminControl
`
`ATTRIBUTE
`
`APPROPRIATE SYNTAX:
`
`Same as aAutoNegAdminState
`BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS:
`
`This action provides a means to turn Auto-Negotiation signaling on or off;
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanggrd.
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0351
`
`

`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`0352
`
`1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0352
`
`

`
`CSMNCD
`
`Annex 22A
`
`(informative)
`
`IEEE
`Std B{}2_3u—‘l 995
`
`MII output delay, setup, and hold time budget
`
`22A.1 System model
`
`The discussion of signal timing characteristics that follows will refer to the system n1odel depicted in
`figure 22A-1, figure 22A-2, and figure 22A-3. This system model can be applied to each of the three
`application enviromnents defined in 22.2.].
`
`Figure 22A—1 depicts a simple system model in which the MII is used to interconnect two integrated
`circuits on the same circuit assembly. In this n1odel the Reconciliation sublayer comprises one integrated
`circuit, and the PHY comprises the other. A Reconciliation sublayer or a PHY may actually be
`composed of several separate integrated circuits. The system model
`in figure 22A-1 includes two
`unidirectional signal transmission paths, one from the Reconciliation sublayer to the PHY and one from
`the PHY to the Reconciliation sublayer. The path from the Reconciliation sublayer to the PHY is
`separated into two sections, labeled A1 and B]. The path from the PHY to the Reconciliation sublayer is
`separated into two sections, labeled C1 and D1.
`
`Reconciliation
`
`sublayer
`
`PHY“)
`
`Figure 22A-1—Mode| for integrated circuit to integrated circuit connection
`
`Figure 22A—1 depicts a system model for the case where the M11 is used to interconnect two circuit
`assemblies. The circuit assemblies may be physically connected in a motherboardfdaughterboard
`arrangement, or they may be physically connected with the cable defined in 22.4.5 and the line interface
`connector defined in 22.6. The system model
`in figure 22A-2 includes two unidirectional signal
`transmission paths, one from the Reconciliation sublayer to the PHY and one from the PHY to the
`Reconciliation sublayer. The path from the Reconciliation sublayer to the PHY is separated into two
`sections, labeled A2 and B2. The path from the PHY to the Reconciliation sublayer is separated into two
`sections, labeled C2 and D2.
`
`Figure 22A-3 depicts a system model in which the MII is used to interconnect both integrated circuits
`and circuit assemblies. This system model allows for separate signal transmission paths to exist between
`the Reconciliation sublayer and a local PHY(L)_. and between the Reconciliation sublayer and a remote
`PI-TY(R). The unidirectional paths between the Reconciliation sublayer and the PHY(L) are composed of
`sections A1, B1, C1, and D1. The unidirectional paths between the Reconciliation sublayer and the
`remote PHY(R) are composed of sections A2, B2, C2, and D2.
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stangigrd.
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1
`
`0
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0353
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 8D2.3u—1995
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Reconciliation
`
`sublayer
`
`Figure 22A-2—|'1i‘|ode| for circuit assembly to circuit assembly connection
`
`Reconciliation
`
`sublayer
`
`Figure 22A-3—Combined model
`
`Each of these system models assumes a set of common tinning and electrical cllaracteristics that shall be met
`at the input and output ports of the Reconciliation sublayer and PHY devices. The characteristics of the signal
`transmission paths are identified for each of the sections A1, B1, C1, D1, A2. B2, C2, and D2.
`
`22A.2 Signal transmission path characteristics
`
`The signal transmission path characteristics are specified for each of the path sections defined in 22A.1.
`The characteristics for these sections are specified so as to allow sections Al, B1, C1, and D1 to be
`implemented in the form of printed circuit board traces, while sections A2, B2, C2, and D2 may be
`implemented with a combination of printed circuit board traces and wire conductors in a cable assembly.
`
`This is angggchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0354
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 8D2.3u-1995
`
`The signal transmission path characteristics are stated in terms of their maximum delay and their
`characteristic impedance. These values are summarized in table 22A-1.
`
`Table 22A-1—SignaI transmission path characteristics
`
`
`
`The driver characteristics specified in 22.4.3, the receiver characteristics specified in 22.4.4, and the
`signal transmission path characteristics specified in table 22A-1 can be applied to the system models
`shown in figure 22A-1 or figure 22A-2. The combination of loads presented in figure 22A-3 cannot be
`adequately driven by an output buffer that meets the driver characteristics specified in 22.4.3 while being
`sampled by an input buffer that meets the receiver characteristics specified in 22.4.4.
`
`To address the system model depicted in figure 22A-3, it is permissible to incorporate an additional
`stage of buffering into path sections Al, A2, D1, and D2, provided that the resulting maximum delay
`characteristic for those path sections does not exceed the value stated in table 22A-1. The delay
`characteristic for transmission path sections A2 and D2 includes an allowance for the delay that results
`from the presence of a lumped capacitive load at the end of the path. For a transmission path section
`with a characteristic impedance Z0, with a lumped capacitive load CL, this delay is nominally ZOCL. In
`the case of a maximum transmission path section impedance of 78 Q with a lumped load of 8 pF, the
`nominal delay is 0.6 ns. Thus the allowable delay for a buffer inserted into transmission path section A2
`or D2 is 4.4 ns.
`
`22A.3 Budget calculation
`
`A recommended timing budget is shown in table 22A-2. This budget assumes that the combined system
`model shown in figure 22A-3 represents a worst case.
`
`Table 22A-2—Round-trip delay budget
`
`
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stangigrd.
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0355
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u—1995
`
`Annex 22B
`
`(informative)
`
`Mll driver ac characteristics
`
`SUPPLEMENT T0 802.3:
`
`22B.1 Implications of CMOS ASIC processes
`
`For M11 drivers that drive rail to rail, such as those commonly used in CMOS ASICS (complimentary
`metal oxide semiconductor application-specific integrated circuits), the ac characteristic performance
`requirements of 22.4.3.2 can be met if tl1e V0,, vs. Ioh and V0] vs. I01 dc characteristics of the driver stay
`within the unshaded areas of figure 22B-1.
`
`The variation in output resistance of a field effect transistor (FET) due to variations in supply voltage,
`temperature, and process may require that a resistance be placed in series with the output of the FETs to
`meet this specification. The series resistance can be part of the driver circuit, or external to the driver. If
`the series resistance is not part of the driver circuit, the driver vendor shall specify the value of series
`resistance required to meet
`the specification. A series resistor used to meet
`this specification is
`conceptually part of the driver regardless of whether it is physically internal or external to the driver.
`
`The propagation delay of the path between the driver and an external series resistor used to meet the
`specification shall not exceed 10% of the 10-90% riseffall time of the driver.
`
`Figure 22B-1—Driver output V—l curve
`
`This is anggrchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0356
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 8D2.3u-1995
`
`22B.2 R°(min) and V, I values for operation from 5V :1 0% supply
`
`Referring to figure 22B-1, Rommin) and R010-njn) both equal 40 Q, and the values for the V-I points on the
`curve are given in table 22B-1 below for MII drivers that drive rail to rail from a +5 V :I: 10% power
`supply.
`
`Table 22B-1—Values for driver output V-I curve (5 V supply)
`
`
`
`22B.3 R°(mi,,) and\I, I values for operation from 3.3 1 0.3V supply
`
`Referring to figure 22B-1, Rohonin) and Roumin) both equal 33 Q, and the values for the V-I points on the
`curve are given in table 22B-2 below for MII drivers that drive rail to rail from a +3.3 :: 0.3 V power
`supply.
`
`Table 22B-2—Values for driver output V-I curve (3.3 V supply)
`
`
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stangigrd.
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0357
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Annex 22C
`
`(informative)
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Measurement techniques for MII signal timing characteristics
`
`22C.1 Measuring timing characteristics of source terminated signals
`
`The measurement of timing relationships between MII signals at the MII connector is complicated by
`the use of driver output impedance to control transmission line reflections on point-to-point transmission
`paths passing through the connector. The voltage waveforms on point-to-point transmission paths can be
`different at the MII connector and at the end of the paths. A clean transition (or step) from one logic
`state to the other at the end of a point to point path can appear as two ha1f—steps at the M11 connector.
`
`To eliminate ambiguity as to where on a two half—step state transition to measure timing, all timing
`measurements on point-to-point transmission paths will be at the end of the path. In some cases, an end
`of path must be artificially created.
`
`22C.2 Measuring timing characteristics of transmit signals at the MII
`
`The timing of TX_EN, TX_ER, and TXD<3:0> relative to TX_CLK at the MII connector is measured as
`follows.
`
`Use the time base for TX_CLK as a timing reference. Break the TX_CLK path at the MII connector,
`forcing the TX_CLK point-to-point transmission path to end at the connector. Measure when the rising
`edge of TX_CLK passes through Vmmin) at the M11 connector. Call this time Tclk. Reconnect the
`TX_CLK path at the MII connector and break the paths of TX_EN, TX_ER, and TXD<3:0> at the IVJII
`connector, forcing the paths to end at the connector. Measure when TX_EN, TX_ER, and TXD<3:0>
`exit the switching region at the M11 connector. Call these times Ten, T6,, and T<3.0>, respectively.
`
`The timing relationships at the MII connector for TX_EN, TX_ER, and TXD<3:0> relative to TX_CLK
`are met if (Tm — Talk), (Te, — Tcug, (T3 — Tclk), (T2 — Tclk), (T1 — Tclk), and (T0 — Tclk), respectively, meet
`the timing relationships specified in 22.3.1.
`
`22C.3 Measuring timing characteristics of receive signals at the MII
`
`The timing of RX_DV, RX_ER, and RXD<3:0> relative to RX_CLK at the MII connector is measured
`as follows.
`
`Break the paths of RX_CLK, RX_DV, RX_ER, and RXD<3:0> at the MII connector, forcing the paths
`to end at the connector. Measure when RX_DV, RX_ER, and RXD<3:0> exit the switching region at the
`
`M11 connector relative to when the rising edge of RX_CLK passes through Vmmax). Also measure when
`RX_DV, RX_ER, and RXD<3:0> reenter the switching region relative to when the rising edge of
`RX_CLK passes through Vimmin) .
`
`The timing relationships at the MII connector for RX_DV, RX_ER, and RXD<3:0> relative to RX_CLK
`are met if the times measured in the previous step meet the timing relationships specified in 22.3.2.
`
`This is argggchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0358
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`22C.4 Measuring timing characteristics of MDIO
`
`The MDIO and MDC signal timing characteristics cannot be measured using the techniques defined for
`the transmit and receive signals since MDIO and MDC may connect a single station management entity
`to multiple PHY devices. The MDIO and MDC timing characteristics are measured with a PHY
`connected to the MII connector. The signal timing characteristics for MDC and MDIO must be met over
`the range of conditions which occur when from one to 32 PHYS are connected to an STA. When 32
`PHYS are connected to an STA, the total capacitance can be as large as 390 pF on MDC, and as large as
`470 pF on MDIO.
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0359
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Annex 23A
`
`(nonnafive)
`
`6T code words
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`The leftmost ternary symbol of each 6T Code group shown in table 23A-1 (broken into 23A-la and 23A-lb
`for pagination) shall be transmittedfirst. The leftmost nibble of each data octet is the most sigmficant.
`
`Table 23A-1a—100BASE-T4 8B6T code table
`
`6T code group
`—— O -— O O —
`
`0
`
`O
`
`o
`
`-o
`
`o
`
`Data
`octet
`
`60
`
`61
`
`62
`
`63
`
`64
`
`6T code group
`O-O——+O
`
`oo—uou
`
`o—o«o«
`
`o—o+
`
`O
`
`I I I
`
`Data
`octet
`
`m 1
`
`I\.
`Ix. [\)
`Ix. OJ
`Ix. Ib-
`Ix. U'|
`Ix. OW
`Ix. \l
`Ix. O0
`Ix. k.O
`
`Data
`octet
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`6T code group
`_++_
`00
`+ (D
`
`0..
`
`OOO++ O
`
`Data
`octet
`
`00
`
`O1
`
`02
`
`03
`
`O4
`
`O5
`
`O6
`
`O7
`
`O8
`
`09
`
`0A
`
`6Tcodegroup
`———OO+—
`
`O+—~—O
`
`———0-——O
`
`—O+~—O
`
`—O+O+—
`
`O+——0+
`
`+—O—O+
`
`—0+—0+
`
`—+OO+—
`
`O—++—O
`
`—+0+—O
`
`+
`
`+
`
`I I I
`
`I I IOOOOOOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOO+++OOOOOOOO
`
`++0
`
`7F
`
`OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO+OII
`OOOOOOOO
`
`I
`
`B t
`
`a?
`
`(3
`
`oooO++++++OOooc>
`
`II+OOO
`
`OB
`
`OC
`
`0 3
`
`OZ
`
`L‘J
`
`OF
`
`10
`
`LJ'(7b3t37©b0\lb\LnJ>iA)Ni4
`
`1F
`
`»O—+—O
`
`»O—O+—
`
`O—+-O-
`
`—+O—0--
`
`_0__0_
`
`~O+——O
`
`—+0—0—
`
`.O__0_
`
`O+——0—
`
`0+-——O
`
`~+0O——
`
`-O+O——
`
`O++O——
`
`O+—O+—
`
`O+—O——
`
`O+—++—
`
`O+—OO——
`
`O—+O0+
`
`O—++—-
`
`O--O—+
`
`0--0-—
`
`2F
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`37
`
`38
`
`39
`
`3E
`
`3D
`
`3F
`
`This is an3gg'chive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`03 60
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0360
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Table 23A-1b—10OBASE-T4 8B6T code table
`
`Data
`
`octet
`80
`
`81
`
`82
`
`83
`
`84
`
`85
`
`86
`
`6T code group
`-~—+OO—
`
`-~+—O—O
`
`——-+O—O
`
`—++O—O
`
`—++00—
`
`++--00
`
`+—+—0O
`
`Data
`
`octet
`A0
`
`Al
`
`A2
`
`A3
`
`A4
`
`A5
`
`A6
`
`6T code group
`O—O++—
`
`OO—+—-»
`
`0—0+—-—
`
`—OO+—-»
`
`—O0+--—
`
`oo—--~--
`
`0—O—
`
`Data
`
`octet
`CO
`
`Cl
`
`C2
`
`C3
`
`C4
`
`c5
`
`C6
`
`C7
`
`6T code group
`-~—--O+—
`
`-»+—+—O
`
`———--+—0
`
`—+——+—O
`
`—+—-O+—
`
`-~+--o-~
`
`»- —O+
`
`—+——0——
`
`Data
`
`octet
`E0
`
`El
`
`E2
`
`E3
`
`:34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`:37
`
`6T code group
`+—O--+-
`
`O+————+
`
`+—O—-—+
`
`—O+———+
`
`—0+----—
`
`0+--»+
`
`+—O—
`
`—O————
`
`87
`
`88
`
`89
`
`8A
`
`8B
`
`8C
`
`8D
`
`83
`
`8F
`
`—+——00
`
`O+OO0-
`
`0O—O—O
`
`0+0O—O
`
`-»OOO—O
`
`—00O0—
`
`OO+—0O
`
`0+0—0O
`
`-~OO—OO
`
`A7
`
`A8
`
`A9
`
`AA
`
`AB
`
`AC
`
`AD
`
`A3
`
`AF
`
`—O0————
`
`—+—+——
`
`——++——
`
`—+—+——
`
`+——+—
`
`+——+———
`
`——+—»
`
`—+——
`
`+———»»
`
`C8
`
`C9
`
`CA
`
`CB
`
`OC
`
`CD
`
`C3
`
`CF
`
`38
`
`:39
`
`EA
`
`4)
`
`I:
`
`O+0O+—
`
`00———0
`
`0+0———0
`
`~OO+—O
`
`—0O0+—
`
`OO+—O-~
`
`O+0—0--
`
`~OO—O-»
`
`*
`
`—+O-
`
`—
`
`0—————
`
`—+0———
`
`+0--—+
`
`+0--—-
`
`O—+—»—
`
`—+O---
`
`~O——~+
`
`90
`
`9l
`
`92
`
`93
`
`94
`
`95
`
`96
`
`97
`
`——+——+
`
`»+————
`
`»—+—-—
`
`—++— —
`
`—++——+
`
`++—+——
`
`+—++——
`
`—+++——
`
`B0
`
`Bl
`
`B2
`
`B3
`
`B4
`
`B5
`
`B6
`
`B7
`
`0-000
`
`OO—O~O
`
`0—O0~O
`
`—O00——O
`
`—OOOO+
`
`0O—+OO
`
`O—O+OO
`
`-OO+OO
`
`30
`
`31
`
`D2
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`37
`
`-— O—-
`
`~+——+O
`
`~———+0
`
`—
`
`—+O
`
`—+-O—+
`
`» —~O—
`
`——--0-
`
`—
`
`-»O—
`
`F0
`
`Fl
`
`E2
`
`F3
`
`F4
`
`F5
`
`F6
`
`F7
`
`-000-
`
`O+—O»O
`
`~—O0—~O
`
`—0+0——0
`
`—O+OO+
`
`O+--O0
`
`+—O—-O0
`
`—0+—O0
`
`—--000+
`
`98
`
`99
`
`9A
`
`9B
`
`9C
`
`9D
`
`9E
`
`9F
`
`0+0——+
`
`OO+———
`
`0+0———
`
`—O0———
`
`»OO——+
`
`O0++——
`
`O+O+——
`
`+00+——
`
`B8
`
`B9
`
`BA
`
`BB
`
`BC
`
`BD
`
`BE
`
`BF
`
`—-—00+
`
`——+O--O
`
`———0—O
`
`+——0—O
`
`+——OO+
`
`——++0O
`
`—+—-i-OO
`
`+——+OO
`
`38
`
`39
`
`DA
`
`DB
`
`I2
`
`DD
`
`33
`
`DF
`
`0-—00—+
`
`O0 —+O
`
`0—0—+0
`
`—O0—+0
`
`»OOO—+
`
`O0+—0—
`
`O+O+O—
`
`+00-0-
`
`F8
`
`F9
`
`EA
`
`EB
`
`FC
`
`ED
`
`FE
`
`FF
`
`O—+O~0
`
`———00——O
`
`—0—O—0
`
`»O—0O+
`
`O—+—-O0
`
`—+O--O0
`
`+0---00
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`O3 61
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0361
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Annex 23B
`
`(informative)
`
`Noise budget
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Worst-case values for noise effects in the IOOBASE-T4 system are as shown in tables 23B-1 and 23B-2.
`
`Table 23B-1—Carrier presence analysis
`
`Table 23B-2—Far-end signal analysis
`
`
`
`This is ariglmchive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this standard.
`
`0362
`
`1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0362
`
`

`
`CSMA/CD
`
`Annex 23C
`
`(informative)
`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Use of cabling systems with a nominal differential characteristic
`impedance of 120 Q
`
`The 100BASE-T4 standard specifies only the use of 100 9. link segments for conformance. Since
`ISO/IEC 11801: 1995 also recognizes 120 Q cabling, this informative annex specifies the conditions for
`using cabling systems with a nominal characteristic impedance of 120 Q by 100BASE-T4 conformant
`stations.
`
`The use of cables with a characteristic impedance outside the range specified in 23.6 will generally
`increase the mismatching effects in the link components, inducing additional noise in the received signals.
`
`In particular, the use of a homogeneous link segment having a characteristic impedance of 120 Q :I:15 (2
`over the frequency band 1 to 16 MHz may add up to 1.4% of additional noise to the signals at the input of
`the receivers (worst-case short-length link segment).
`
`Therefore, in order to keep the overall noise (MDFEXT + reflections) at the same value as for a 100 Q
`link segment when using a 120 9 link segment, the minimum ELFEXT loss requirement for the cable
`must be increased by 2 dB (i.e., from 23 dB to 25 dB at 12.5 MHz, see 23.6.3.2). Accordingly, the
`MDFEXT noise requirement shall be decreased from 87 mV peak to 69 mV peak. In practice, this means
`that cables rated category 4 or higher, as specified in ISO/IEC 11801: 1995, are required when 120 9
`cables are used with 100BASE-T4 compliant PMDs.
`
`NOTES
`
`l—The use of 100 Q cords at end points in conjunction with 120 Q premises cabling may be tolerated provided that all
`the components of the link are of category 5, as defined in ISO/IEC 11801: 1995.
`
`2—The use of 100 Q cords at any intermediate cross-connect points on 120 9 links as well as the use of 120 S2 cords in
`conjunction with 100 Q premises cabling is not allowed since it would result in worst-case jitter greater than that
`allowed in this standard.
`
`CAUTION—Users of this annex are fiirther advised to check with the manufacturer of the particular 100BASE-T4 cou-
`plers they intend to use with a 120 9 link to see whether those couplers can operate correctly on cables with Zc as high
`as
`Q2:
`9.
`
`This is an Archive IEEE Standard.
`
`It has been superseded by a later version of this stanglard.
`
`0363
`
`it 1025
`
`Aerohive - Exhibit 1025
`
`0363
`
`

`
`IEEE
`Std 802.3u-1995
`
`Annex 27A
`
`(normative)
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO 802.3:
`
`Repeater delay consistency requirements
`
`Proper operation of the network requires that repeaters do not cause the Inter-Packet Gap (IPG) to
`disappear by propagating the end of any carrier event to different output ports with greatly different delay
`times. Maximum port-to-port delays have been assigned as absolute delays to meet requirements for
`detection of collision within a slot time and limiting the length of collision fragments to less than
`minimum frame size. To avoid specification of minimum input—to—output propagation time as absolute
`values that reduce implementation flexibility, these delays are instead implied by imposing a triangular
`delay inequality relationship.
`
`Consider three ports {A, B, C}. Using the notation SOP(xy) to mean the start—of—packet delay for an input
`at port x to resulting output on port y, repeaters shall achieve this relationship for all groups of three ports
`within a repeater set:
`
`SOP(AC) < SOP(AB) + SOP(BC)
`
`Following a frame transmitted by node A that propagates to nodes B and C, this constraint ensures that
`node B cannot complete an IPG timer and initiate a transmission that arrives at node C before node C has
`also advanced its own IPG timer sufliciently that a pending frame can contend for access to the network.
`
`There is a second delay consistency requirement, one that relates to jam propagation by repeaters. Using a
`notation similar to that above, SOJ(xy) stands for the start

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket