throbber
Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`Burrows, 5-6.
`
`this procedure reads and decompresses a full
`“Unfortunately,
`compression block even if the caller wanted only some smaller unit, such
`as a file system block or a physical sector. We alleviate this problem by
`caching the entire decompressed block in memory, rather than just
`caching the requested sectors. The data could be placed in the file system
`buffer cache, but for simplicity in our prototype, we cached the last
`decompressed block within the read routine. Sprite LFS reads files
`sequentially in 4 KByte units, so this simple caching strategy typically
`achieves three hits for each 16 KByte compression block when reading
`large files.
`
`When the file system is reading non-sequentially, the additional time to
`read a full compression block cannot be hidden by caching. Fortunately,
`this time is small compared to the rotational latency. The time needed to
`decompress the full block in software is several milliseconds; it would be
`much smaller if decompression were implemented in hardware.”
`
`Burrows, 6.
`
`
`
`Claim 1.5
`
`Burrows
`“utilizing said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data to boot said computer system, wherein said at least a portion of said
`boot data is decompressed by said data compression engine.”
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 26
`
`3201
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`2. The method of claim 1, wherein said
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`decompressed at least a portion of said
`“said decompressed at least a portion of
`boot data comprises program code
`said boot data comprises program code
`associated with an operating system of
`associated with an operating system of
`said computer system.
`said computer system.”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data
`comprises program code associated with an operating system of said computer system),
`Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a
`computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which
`the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See
`Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.4, and 1.5 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data comprises
`program code associated with an operating system of said computer system..”
`
`
`
`Claim 2
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 26
`
`3202
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`3. The method of claim 1, wherein said
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`decompressed at least a portion of said
`“said decompressed at least a portion of
`boot data comprises program code
`said boot data comprises program code
`associated with an application program of
`associated with an application program of
`said computer system.
`said computer system.”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data
`comprises program code associated with an application program of said computer
`system), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`See also
`
`“A second issue is that applications often commit small amounts of data
`to disk, resulting in poor compression.”
`
`
`Burrows, 9.
`
`
`“The scheme benefits from concentrating on executable files, which are
`read by few things besides the operating system itself; no attempt is
`made to make the compression transparent to other applications.”
`
`
`
`Burrows, 18.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data comprises
`program code associated with an application program of said computer system.”
`
`
`
`Claim 3
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 26
`
`3203
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`4. The method of claim 1, wherein said
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`decompressed at least a portion of said
`“said decompressed at least a portion of
`boot data comprises program code
`said boot data comprises program code
`associated with an application program
`associated with an application program
`and an operating system of said computer
`and an operating system of said computer
`system.
`system.”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data
`comprises program code associated with an application program of said computer
`system), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`See also
`
`“A second issue is that applications often commit small amounts of data
`to disk, resulting in poor compression.”
`
`
`Burrows, 9.
`
`
`“The scheme benefits from concentrating on executable files, which are
`read by few things besides the operating system itself; no attempt is
`made to make the compression transparent to other applications.”
`
`
`
`Burrows, 18.
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein said decompressed at least a portion of said boot data comprises
`program code associated with an application program and an operating system of said computer system.”
`
`
`
`Claim 4
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 26
`
`3204
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`5. The method of claim 1, wherein said
`preloading is performed by a data storage
`controller connected to said boot device.
`
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“said preloading is performed by a data
`storage controller connected to said boot
`device.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, said preloading is performed by a data storage
`controller connected to said boot device), Apple contends that one of skill in the art
`would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that
`is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of
`skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`See also
`
`“These problems suggest that the compressor should be placed in the
`disk controller, but doing so requires more changes to LFS, and quite
`specialized hardware.”
`
`
`Burrows, 12.
`
`
`“But it is not possible to tell whether a particular disk block will fit in
`the current segment until compression has taken place, so we cannot
`determine what data should be written until the data has been
`transferred to the controller for compression.”
`
`
`Burrows, 12-13.
`
`
`“Once forward references are eliminated, our problem can be solved by
`placing a large buffer in the disk controller to hold the compressed
`data.”
`
`
`Burrows, 13.
`
`
`“Thus, the file system can prepare a larger amount of data for writing
`than will actually fit in the current segment, and can instruct the
`controller to truncate the write if it occupies more than the amount of
`physical space available.”
`
`
`Burrows, 13.
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein said preloading is performed by a
`data storage controller connected to said boot device.”
`
`
`
`Claim 5
`
`
`
`Page 13 of 26
`
`3205
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`“Finally, a disk controller containing a compressor must inform the
`software where each compressed block fell on the disk. Ideally, it would
`also construct the logical block map and append it to the data being
`written, in order to avoid an extra disk transfer to place the map at the
`end of the segment.”
`
`“The design can be adapted to use hardware compression devices, either
`combined with a disk controller or packaged separately.”
`
`
`Burrows, 13.
`
`
`Burrows, 18.
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein said preloading is performed by a
`data storage controller connected to said boot device.”
`
`
`
`Claim 5
`
`
`
`Page 14 of 26
`
`3206
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`6. The method of claim 1, further
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`comprising updating the list of boot data.
`“updating the list of boot data.”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, updating the list of boot data), Apple contends that
`one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to
`include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied
`upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of
`Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, further comprising updating the list of boot data.”
`
`
`
`Claim 6
`Page 15 of 26
`
`
`
`3207
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`8. The method of claim 1, wherein
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to
`“Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to
`provide said at least a portion of said boot
`provide said at least a portion of said boot
`data in said compressed form.
`data in said compressed form.”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to provide
`said at least a portion of said boot data in said compressed form), Apple contends that
`one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to
`include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied
`upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of
`Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`See also
`
`“Besides the algorithms based on Wheeler’s ideas, we tried the LZRW1-
`A and LZRW3-A algorithms due to Williams. A full description and
`implementation are available elsewhere [15, 16], so we omit the details
`here.”
`
`Burrows, 11. See also Table 2.
`
`“For comparison, we include figures for the popular compress utility,
`which uses the LZC algorithm, and the zoo archiver, which uses the LZSS
`algorithm. The table shows that the algorithms we chose are quite fast,
`but better compression could be obtained by sacrificing speed.
`
`Bell, Witten, and Cleary give a more thorough comparison of
`compression algorithms and their effectiveness on different sorts of data
`[3]. They also describe the LZC and LZSS algorithms.”
`
`Burrows, 11-12.
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to provide said at least
` a portion of said boot data in said compressed form.”
`
`
`
`Claim 8
`
`
`
`Page 16 of 26
`
`3208
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`9. The method of claim 1, wherein a
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`plurality of encoders are utilized to
`“a plurality of encoders are utilized to
`provide said at least a portion of
`provide said at least a portion of
`compressed data in compressed form.
`compressed data in compressed form.”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, wherein a plurality of encoders are utilized to provide
`said at least a portion of compressed data in compressed form), Apple contends that one
`of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include
`the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of encoders are utilized to provide said at least
`a portion of compressed data in compressed form.”
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`Page 17 of 26
`
`3209
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`11.1. a processor;
`
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“a processor.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, a processor), Apple contends that one of skill in the
`art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element
`that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge
`of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 1.2 above.
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“A system comprising: a processor;”
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 11.1
`Page 18 of 26
`
`
`
`3210
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`11.2. a memory; and
`
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“a memory.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, a memory), Apple contends that one of skill in the
`art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element
`that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge
`of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.3, and 1.4 above.
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“a memory”
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 11.2
`Page 19 of 26
`
`
`
`3211
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`11.3.1 a non-volatile memory device for
`storing logic code associated with the
`processor, wherein said logic code
`comprises instructions executable by the
`processor for maintaining a list of boot
`data used for booting the host system, at
`least a portion of said boot data is stored
`in compressed form in said non-volatile
`memory device,
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“a non-volatile memory device for storing
`logic code associated with the processor,
`wherein said logic code comprises
`instructions executable by the processor
`for maintaining a list of boot data used for
`booting the host system, at least a portion
`of said boot data is stored in compressed
`form in said non-volatile memory device.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, a non-volatile memory device for storing logic code
`associated with the processor, wherein said logic code comprises instructions executable
`by the processor for maintaining a list of boot data used for booting the host system, at
`least a portion of said boot data is stored in compressed form in said non-volatile memory
`device), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 above.
`
`
`
`Claim 11.3.1
`
`Burrows
`“a non-volatile memory device for storing logic code associated with the processor, wherein said logic code comprises instructions
`executable by the processor for maintaining a list of boot data used for booting the host system, at least a portion of said boot data is
`stored in compressed form in said non-volatile memory device”
`
`
`
`Page 20 of 26
`
`3212
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`11.3.2 said at least a portion of said boot
`data in compressed form is preloaded into
`said memory, and said preloaded at least a
`portion of boot data in compressed form is
`decompressed and utilized to boot said
`computer system; and,
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“said at least a portion of said boot data in
`compressed form is preloaded into said
`memory, and said preloaded at least a
`portion of boot data in compressed form is
`decompressed and utilized to boot said
`computer system.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed
`form is preloaded into said memory, and said preloaded at least a portion of boot data in
`compressed form is decompressed and utilized to boot said computer system), Apple
`contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer
`system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee
`relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and
`VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form is preloaded into said memory, and said preloaded
`at least a portion of boot data in compressed form is decompressed and utilized to boot said computer system”
`
`
`
`
`Claim 11.3.2
`
`Page 21 of 26
`
`3213
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`11.4 a data compression engine for
`providing said at least a portion of said
`boot data in compressed form by
`compressing said at least a portion of said
`boot data and decompressing said at least
`a portion of said boot data in compressed
`form to provide said decompressed at
`least a portion of boot data.
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“a data compression engine for providing
`said at least a portion of said boot data in
`compressed form by compressing said at
`least a portion of said boot data and
`decompressing said at least a portion of
`said boot data in compressed form to
`provide said decompressed at least a
`portion of boot data.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, a data compression engine for providing said at least
`a portion of said boot data in compressed form by compressing said at least a portion of
`said boot data and decompressing said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed
`form to provide said decompressed at least a portion of boot data), Apple contends that
`one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to
`include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied
`upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of
`Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1 and 1.5 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 11.4
`
`Burrows
`“a data compression engine for providing said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form by compressing said at least a
`portion of said boot data and decompressing said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form to provide said decompressed
`at least a portion of boot data.”
`
`
`
`Page 22 of 26
`
`3214
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`12. The system of claim 11, wherein said
`logic code further comprises program
`instructions executable by said processor
`for maintaining a list of application data
`associated with an application program.
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“said logic code further comprises
`program instructions executable by said
`processor for maintaining a list of
`application data associated with an
`application program.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, said logic code further comprises program
`instructions executable by said processor for maintaining a list of application data
`associated with an application program), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 3, and 11.3.1 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The system of claim 11, wherein said logic code further comprises program instructions executable
`by said processor for maintaining a list of application data associated with an application program.”
`
`
`
`Claim 12
`
`
`
`Page 23 of 26
`
`3215
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`13. The system of claim 11, wherein said
`logic code further comprises program
`instructions executable by said processor
`for maintaining a list of application data
`associated with an application program,
`and wherein said application data is
`preloaded upon launching the application
`program and utilized by said computer
`system.
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“wherein said logic code further
`comprises program instructions
`executable by said processor for
`maintaining a list of application data
`associated with an application program,
`and wherein said application data is
`preloaded upon launching the application
`program and utilized by said computer
`system.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, wherein said logic code further comprises program
`instructions executable by said processor for maintaining a list of application data
`associated with an application program, and wherein said application data is preloaded
`upon launching the application program and utilized by said computer system), Apple
`contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer
`system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee
`relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and
`VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1.1, 1.3, 3, 5 and 11.3.1 and 11.3.2 above.
`
`
`
`
`Claim 13
`
`Burrows
`“The system of claim 11, wherein said logic code further comprises program instructions executable by said processor for maintaining
`a list of application data associated with an application program, and wherein said application data is preloaded upon launching the
`application program and utilized by said computer system.”
`
`
`
`Page 24 of 26
`
`3216
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`15. The system of claim 11, wherein
`Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to
`provide said at least a portion of said boot
`data in compressed form.
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to
`provide said at least a portion of said boot
`data in compressed form.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to provide said at
`least a portion of said boot data in compressed form), Apple contends that one of skill in
`the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the
`element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1, 8, and 11 above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The system of claim 11, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding is utilized to provide
`said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form.”
`
`
`
`Claim 15
`
`
`
`Page 25 of 26
`
`3217
`
`

`

`Appendix B27
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Burrows
`
`
`16. The system of claim 11, wherein a
`plurality of encoders are utilized to
`provide said at least a portion of said boot
`data in compressed form.
`
`Burrows, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“a plurality of encoders are utilized to
`provide said at least a portion of said boot
`data in compressed form.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, a plurality of encoders are utilized to provide said at
`least a portion of said boot data in compressed form), Apple contends that one of skill in
`the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the
`element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Burrows discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1, 9, and 11 above.
`
`
`
`
`Burrows
`“The system of claim 11, wherein a plurality of encoders are utilized to provide said
`at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form.
`
`
`
`Claim 16
`
`
`
`Page 26 of 26
`
`3218
`
`

`

`Appendix B28
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Cheng
`
`The publication Cheng et al., Fast and highly reliable IBMLZ1 compression chip and
`algorithm for storage, Hot Chips V11, August 1995 (“Cheng”) invalidates claims 1-6, 8-9,
`11-13, and 15-16 of United States Patent No. 8,090,936 (“the ’936 Patent”) pursuant to 35
`U.S.C. § 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 103 either alone or in combination with other prior art
`references, and/or in combination with the knowledge of a person of ordinary skill.
`
`The analysis provided in this chart may in some instances uses Realtime’s proposed (or
`implied) claim constructions, and Apple reserves all rights to challenge these proposed (or
`implied) constructions. To the extent any of the charted prior art should fail to disclose an
`element of any claims of the ’936 Patent, Apple reserves the right to rely upon the
`knowledge of one skilled in the art, or any other disclosed prior art, alone or in combination,
`whether produced by Apple or by Realtime, to show the element and thereby invalidate
`those claims. Citations given in the chart below are merely representative of the respective
`elements and are not meant to be exhaustive.
`
`
`
`
`
`Cheng
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 25
`
`3219
`
`

`

`Appendix B28
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Cheng
`
`
`1.1 maintaining a list of boot data used
`for booting a computer system, wherein at
`least a portion of said boot data is
`compressed by a data compression engine
`to provide said at least a portion of said
`boot data in compressed form, and stored
`in compressed form on a boot device;
`
`Cheng, as evidenced by the exemplary
`citations below, discloses
`“maintaining a list of boot data used for
`booting a computer system, wherein at
`least a portion of said boot data is
`compressed by a data compression engine
`to provide said at least a portion of said
`boot data in compressed form, and stored
`in compressed form on a boot device;”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, maintaining a list of boot data used for booting a
`computer system, wherein at least a portion of said boot data is compressed by a data
`compression engine to provide said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed
`form, and stored in compressed form on a boot device), Apple contends that one of skill
`in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the
`element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Cheng discloses this limitation:
`
`“Compression Benefits for Storage System
`
`• Compression x Compaction = 4.5 X - 6.0 X
`
`•System Performance”
`
`Cheng, 144. See also Cheng, 144 Fig.1, Fig. 2.
`
`“Data compression allows more efficient use of storage media and
`communication bandwidth. Standard compression offerings for tape
`storage have been well-established since the late 1980s.”
`
`Cheng, 155.
`
`“Compression allows existing platforms and applications to benefit from
`a lower storage cost and potentially higher performance without any
`change to system hardware or software.”
`
`Cheng, 155.
`
`“The IBMLZl algorithm and technology was designed for high
`compression/decompression
`throughput with efficient hardware
`implementation, high reliability, low system overhead, and robust
`compression. Data integrity and reliability are ensured by coupled
`Claim 1.1
`
`Cheng
`“maintaining a list of boot data used for booting a computer system, wherein at least a portion of said boot data is compressed by a
`data compression engine to provide said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form, and stored in compressed form on a
`boot device;”
`
`Page 2 of 25
`
`3220
`
`

`

`Appendix B28
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Cheng
`
`scrubbing operation, and
`compression-decompression checking,
`extensive build-in checkings. Extremely low CPB=l6 compression and
`decompression
`have
`been
`achieved. The
`extremely
`high
`compressing/decompressing throughput of 30 MB/sec-50 MB/sec allows
`transparent mode of operation and hence achieved minimal system
`overhead. The IBMLZl algorithm compresses well over the VM, MVS,
`RS6000, and PC test cases.”
`
`Cheng, 163.
`
`Claim 1.1
`
`Cheng
`“maintaining a list of boot data used for booting a computer system, wherein at least a portion of said boot data is compressed by a
`data compression engine to provide said at least a portion of said boot data in compressed form, and stored in compressed form on a
`boot device;”
`
`Page 3 of 25
`
`3221
`
`

`

`Appendix B28
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Cheng
`
`
`1.2 initializing a central processing unit of
`said computer system;
`
`
`Cheng, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“initializing a central processing unit of
`said computer system;”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, initializing a central processing unit of said computer
`system), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions..
`
`Cheng
`“initializing a central processing unit of said computer system;”
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1.2
`Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`3222
`
`

`

`Appendix B28
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,090,936 based on Cheng
`
`
`1.3 preloading said at least a portion of
`said boot data in compressed form from
`said boot device to a memory;
`
`Cheng, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“preloading said at least a portion of said
`boot data in compressed form from said
`boot device to a memory;”
`
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, preloading said at least a portion of said boot data in
`compressed form from said boot device to a memory), Apple contends that one of skill
`in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket