Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 28
`
`Exhibit C
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 1 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 2 of 28
`
`Realtime’s
`Proposed
`Construction
`“data related to the
`boot process”
`
`Term
`
`
`“boot data”
`(cls. 1-6, 8, 9,
`11, 13-15, 17,
`19, 23, 24, 29,
`31-33, 35, 36,
`39, 43-45, 47-
`50, 52, 53, 71,
`72, 77, 79-81,
`83, 84, 89, 91-
`93, 97, 98, 107)
`
`PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONS AND IDENTIFICATION OF INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE FOR U.S.
`PATENT NO. 8,880,862
`
`Realtime’s Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Apple’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Apple’s Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Evidence1
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:41-63, 4:4-23, 9:21-27,
`11:25-35, 17:40-42, 21:38-
`40, 21:53-62, 22:14-19,
`22:26-45, 22:51-23:10,
`27:43-64, 28:1-25, 28:49-53,
`28:57-30:39
`’936 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:31-60, 4:1-17, 9:6-12,
`10:67-11:8, 17:16-18, 21:8-
`10, 21:23-31, 21:50-55,
`21:62-22:13, 22:18-43, 27:6-
`33, 27:37-44, 27:51-28:46
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:35-63, 4:4-20, 9:9-14,
`11:7-15, 16:60-62, 20:43-45,
`20:58-66, 21:18-23, 21:30-
`48, 21:53-22:11, 26:38-
`27:63, 28:1-46, 28:50-54,
`28:58-29:19, 29:26-29,
`29:33-48, 29:53-64, 30:1-28,
`30:32-56, 31:30-41, 31:47-
`32:11, 32:18-34:26
`
`“data on the storage
`device identified by the
`boot data list or
`otherwise loaded during
`the boot process”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608: Abstract; 3:44-49; 9:22-
`27; 21:31-22:8, 22:20-23:10,
`27:61-64
`Provisional application No.
`60/180,114 at 57-58
`Extrinsic Evidence
`ARM Architecture Reference
`Manual A2-13 (February
`2000)
`IA-32 Intel Architecture
`Software Developer’s Manual
`- Volume 3: System
`Programming Guide Chapter 8
`(2000)
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 103 (1996).
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 113 (2001).
`
`
`1 Where one asserted patent is cited, Apple reserves the right to rely on similar disclosures in the other two asserted patents.
`1
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 2 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 3 of 28
`
`’608 File History at
`RTDAPP0000516-517, 622-
`623
`’936 File History at
`RTDAPP0002068-069
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 8-9, 13,
`50, 52, 57-58, 73
`Incorporated 09/775,897
`published as U.S. Pub. No.
`2001/ 0047473 at ¶ 13
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Andrew N. Sloss, Dominic
`Symes, & Chris Wright, Arm
`System Developer’s Guide:
`Designing and Optimizing
`System Software 13 (2004)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:41-63, 4:4-23, 9:21-27,
`11:25-35, 17:40-42, 21:38-
`40, 21:53-62, 22:14-19,
`22:26-45, 22:51-23:10,
`27:43-64, 28:1-25, 28:49-53,
`28:57-30:39; claims 1, 4, 7,
`8, 22
`’936 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:31-60, 4:1-17, 9:6-12,
`2
`
`“the list used by the
`storage controller to pre-
`load boot data into its
`cache memory”
`
`Tom Shanley, MindShare, Inc.
`Pentium® Pro Processor
`System Architecture Chapter 4
`(December 1996)
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608: Abstract, 3:41-51, 22:51-
`23:10 Provisional application
`No. 60/180,114 at 57-58
`Extrinsic Evidence
`ARM Architecture Reference
`Manual A2-13 (February
`2000)
`IA-32 Intel Architecture
`Software Developer’s Manual
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`“boot data list”
`/ “list of boot
`data” / “boot
`list”
`(cls. 1-6, 8, 9,
`11, 13, 14, 19,
`97, 98, 107)
`
`No construction
`necessary beyond the
`construction for
`“boot data.” To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning in view of
`the construction of
`“boot data.”
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 3 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 4 of 28
`
`10:67-11:8, 17:16-18, 21:8-
`10, 21:23-31, 21:50-55,
`21:62-22:13, 22:18-43, 27:6-
`33, 27:37-44, 27:51-28:46;
`claims 1, 6, 11, 18, 20
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:35-63, 4:4-20, 9:9-14,
`11:7-15, 16:60-62, 20:43-45,
`20:58-66, 21:18-23, 21:30-
`48, 21:53-22:11, 26:38-
`27:63, 28:1-46, 28:50-54,
`28:58-29:19, 29:26-29,
`29:33-48, 29:53-64, 30:1-28,
`30:32-56, 31:30-41, 31:47-
`32:11, 32:18-34:26; claims 1-
`9, 11-14, 19, 21, 95, 96-106,
`107, 108
`’608 File History at
`RTDAPP0000516-517, 622-
`623
`’936 File History at
`RTDAPP0002068-069
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 8-9, 13,
`50, 52, 57-58, 73
`Incorporated 09/775,897
`published as U.S. Pub. No.
`2001/ 0047473 at ¶ 13
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`3
`
`- Volume 3: System
`Programming Guide Chapter 8
`(2000)
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 103 (1996).
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 113 (2001).
`Tom Shanley, MindShare, Inc.
`Pentium® Pro Processor
`System Architecture Chapter 4
`(December 1996)
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 4 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 5 of 28
`
`“encode” /
`“encoder” /
`“encoding”
`(cls. 10, 32-33,
`44-45, 49, 80-
`81, 92-93)
`
`
`“hardware or
`software, or a
`combination thereof,
`that converts
`information from on
`format to another” /
`“converting
`information from
`one format to
`another using
`hardware, software,
`or a combination
`thereof”
`
`Andrew N. Sloss, Dominic
`Symes, & Chris Wright, Arm
`System Developer’s Guide:
`Designing and Optimizing
`System Software 13 (2004)
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Figs. 1-5, Figs.
`9-10, 1:56-58, 3:14-17,
`24:52-25:50, 25:53-26:12,
`26:19-34, 26:60-27:11,
`28:64-29:14, 29:33-30:3,
`30:27-39
`’936 patent at Figs. 1-5, Figs.
`9-10, 1:58-60, 3:12-16,
`24:15-25:11, 25:14-40,
`25:47-62, 26:22-40, 27:39-
`49, 28:16-28, 28:52-62
`’862 patent at Figs. 1-5, Figs.
`9-10, 1:61-63, 3:16-19,
`23:50-24:46, 24:49-25:8,
`25:15-30, 25:56-26:7, 27:25-
`34, 27:64-67, 28:16-19,
`29:11-15, 29:27-46, 30:12-
`17, 30:23-25, 30:46-56,
`31:21-29, 31:59-65, 32:29-
`34, 34:1-3
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 2, 8-9, 11-
`12
`
`4
`
`“hardware or software
`on the data storage
`controller that
`compresses data by
`converting the contents
`of a data block into a
`coded representation of
`those contents”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608: 25:3-32, 26:13-34
`’862: 24:1-18, 25:19-30
`’936: 24:33-61, 25:41-62
`Provision application No.
`60/180114 at 2, 8
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Previous claim construction
`orders in Realtime Data, LLC
`v. Actian Corp., 6:15-cv-463-
`RWS-JDL (E.D. Tex. July 28,
`2016); Realtime Data, LLC v.
`Oracle Am., Inc., 6:16-cv-88-
`RWS-JDL (E.D. Tex. July 28,
`2016); Realtime Data, LLC v.
`MetroPCS Texas, LLC, Case
`No. 6:10-cv-493-RC-JDL
`(E.D. Tex. October 1, 2012);
`Realtime Data, LLC v. Morgan
`Stanley, Case No. 1:11-cv-
`6696-KBF (S.D.N.Y. July 9,
`2012); Realtime Data, LLC v.
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 5 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 6 of 28
`
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. No.
`6,195,024 at Abs., Fig. 2-
`10b, 1:45-53, 1:63-2:1, 2:29-
`40, 3:25-33, 3:36-41, 3:47-
`4:6, 4:9-15, 4:24-32, 4:44-46,
`4:60-5:32, 5:35-39, 7:16-21,
`7:16-8:23, 8:33-8:44, 8:56-
`9:25, 9:34-9:40, 9:44-46,
`9:49-10:4, 10:15-66, 11:13-
`21, 11:34-12:7, 12:11-24,
`11:40-44, 11:50-13:28,
`13:40-14:22, 14:24-60,
`15:16-21, 15:26-35, 16:25-
`63, 17:11:63, 18:1-47, 18:53-
`19:56, 20:1-22:26
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. No.
`6,604,158 at Abs., Figs. 2,
`6a-8, 13, 15a-15b, 1:51-58,
`3:8-12, 7:12-15, 7:57-8:57,
`9:60-10:5, 10:23-57, 11:1-7,
`11:44-52, 13:6-14:27, 14:62-
`15:6, 15:53-64
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. No.
`6,601,104 at Figs. 2, 6a-8,
`13, 15a-15b, 1:48-54, 6:40-
`42, 7:15-47, 7:59-67, 8:39-
`42, 9:7-12, 9:32-40, 9:50-56,
`11:37-12:65, 13:33-44,
`14:18-36
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`
`5
`
`Morgan Stanley, Case No.
`1:11-cv-6696-KBF (S.D.N.Y.
`June 22, 2012); Realtime Data,
`LLC v. MetroPCS Texas, LLC,
`Case No. 6:10-cv-493-RC-JDL
`(E.D. Tex. June 7, 2012);
`Realtime Data, LLC. V.
`Packeteer, Inc., Case No. 6:08-
`cv-144-LED-JDL (E.D. Tex.
`June 22, 2009
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 6 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 7 of 28
`
`Dianne Barrett & Todd King,
`Computer Networking
`Illuminated 11 (2005)
`
`Jerry C. Whitaker, The
`Electronics Handbook 1495
`(1996)
`
`Paul Long, Sarah Lawrey, &
`Victoria Ellis, Cambridge
`International AS and A Level
`IT Coursebook 8-10, 13
`(2016)
`
`Michael F. Hordeski, The
`Illustrated Dictionary of
`Microcomputers 121 (3d ed.
`1990)
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:22-52, 2:3-7,
`2:15-21, 3:49-52, 4:4-22,
`5:9-14, 5:54-56, 6:5-10,
`6:25-28, 6:32-35, 6:49-63,
`6:67-7:7, 7:10-19, 7:22-35,
`7:44-49, 7:52-57, 7:60-67,
`8:1-2, 8:18-19, 8:23-27,
`8:36-41, 8:57-60, 9:21-34,
`9:38-42, 10:3-8, 10:11-14,
`10:30-34, 10:58-61, 11:4-26,
`11:31-45, 11:57-60, 12:45-
`50, 12:57-60, 13:40-51,
`6
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Realtime
`Proposal:
`“memory”
`(cls. 1, 6, 11,
`14, 27, 75, 79,
`87)
`
`Apple Proposal:
`“cache” /
`“cache
`memory” /
`“memory”
`
`“data storage
`controller’s physical
`memory for caching
`boot or application data”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608: 1:29-31, 3:50-52, 4:19-
`20, 4:21-28, 6:23-40, Fig. 1
`Provisional application No.
`60/180,114 at 12, 15-17, 20, 58
`Extrinsic Evidence
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 124 (1996).
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 135 (2001).
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 7 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 8 of 28
`
`13:59-64, 14:1-6, 14:20-27,
`14:40-47, 16:18-21, 16:38-
`44, 17:65-18:6, 18:44-49,
`19:12-15, 19:25-27, 19:34-
`38, 19:55-63, 20:4-9, 21:38-
`40, 21:53-56, 21:66-22:2,
`22:28-31, 22:40-50, 22:54-
`63, 22:67-23:10, 23:17-21,
`23:48-56, 23:57-24:7, 24:12-
`19, 27:43-61, 28:9-48, 29:15-
`32, 30:4-26
`’936 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:25-44, 1:50-
`54, 2:16-22, 3:47-49, 4:1-17,
`5:1-5, 5:43-45, 5:62-67,
`6:12-17, 6:20-24, 6:37-50,
`6:59-7:24, 7:41-55, 8:1-5,
`8:9-12, 8:22-36, 8:42-45,
`9:6-12, 9:58:62, 11:5-21,
`11:29-31, 12:15-18, 13:1-21,
`13:26-32, 14:2-7, 14:19-25,
`15:62-64, 16:15-21, 17:22-
`26, 17:44-49, 18:9-11, 18:19-
`24, 18:43-47, 18:50-54,
`18:64-20:25, 21:23-26,
`21:35-38, 21:64-67, 22:8-17,
`22:21-30, 22:34-43, 23:14-
`40, 23:44-51, 24:4-7, 26:41-
`46, 27:5-22, 27:51-28:6,
`28:28-45
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:27-46, 1:53-
`
`7
`
`ARM Architecture Reference
`Manual B5 (February 2000)
`IA-32 Intel Architecture
`Software Developer’s Manual
`- Volume 3: System
`Programming Guide Chapter 9
`(2000)
`IA-32 Intel Architecture
`Software Developer’s Manual
`- Volume 1: Basic Architecture
`Chapter 2.1-2.2 (2000)
`Tom Shanley, MindShare, Inc.
`Pentium® Pro Processor
`System Architecture Chapter 7
`(December 1996)
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 8 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 9 of 28
`
`57, 2:19-25, 3:47-52, 4:4-20,
`5:4-8, 5:47-49, 5:65-6:3,
`6:15-20, 6:23-27, 6:40-7:8,
`7:11-27, 7:46-49, 7:51-58,
`8:6-8, 8:11-15, 8:25-30,
`8:29-41, 8:45-48, 9:9-31,
`9:55-10:1, 10:37-43, 10:53-
`54, 10:60-11:7, 11:12-25,
`11:37-39, 12:24-41, 13:13-
`26, 13:30-60, 14:3-10, 15:40-
`48, 15:60-16:6, 16:66-17:6,
`17:17-23, 18:28-35, 18:42-
`19:63, 20:58-61, 21:3-6,
`21:32-35, 21:43-52, 21:56-
`65, 22:2-11, 22:48-56, 22:57-
`62, 22:64-23:7, 23:12-19,
`23:39-42, 26:7-12, 26:37-51,
`26:60-27:64, 28:1-16, 28:30-
`43, 29:3-5, 29:20-22, 29:33-
`37, 29:60-64, 30:8-11, 30:29-
`31, 30:39-45, 31:3-5, 31:16-
`20, 31:42-44, 31:55-58,
`32:11-14, 32:25-28, 33:22-24
`’936 File History at
`RTDAPP0002068-069
`’862 File History at
`RTDAPP0004940-941
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 2, 8-17,
`20-22, 26-28, 30-36, 46-47,
`50-55, 57-58, 73, 75, 81-85,
`94, 102-103, 106
`
`8
`
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 9 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 10 of 28
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158 at
`Abs., 2:36-40, 3:46-55, 5:7-
`12, 5:38-50, 14:38-51, 15:16-
`28, 17:54-65, 18:60-19:12,
`19:36-53
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. No.
`6,601,104 at Abs., 2:10-18,
`2:28-40, 2:45-49, 2:54-56,
`3:20-28, 5:5-19, 13:9-22,
`13:55-65, 17:32-52, 18:5-20
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Glen E. Clarke, Ed Tetz, &
`Timothy Warner, CompTIA
`A+ Certification: All-in-One
`for Dummies 63, 65, 165-
`182, 230, 252-257, 540, 545-
`546, 676-678, 751 (2016)
`
`Bruce Jacob, Spencer W. Ng,
`& David T. Wang, Memory
`Systems: Cache, DRAM,
`Disk 1-5, 11-14, 34-38
`(2008)
`
`Andrew N. Sloss, Dominic
`Symes, & Chris Wright, Arm
`System Developer’s Guide:
`Designing and Optimizing
`System Software 9-11, 403-
`407 (2004)
`
`
`9
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 10 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 11 of 28
`
`“first memory”
`(cls. 5, 6, 8, 9,
`39, 51, 55)
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Indefinite
`
`Michael F. Hordeski, The
`Illustrated Dictionary of
`Microcomputers 221-223 (3d
`ed. 1990)
`
`See also intrinsic and
`extrinsic evidence at least for
`element “cache” / “cache
`memory.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:22-52, 2:3-7,
`2:15-21, 3:49-52, 4:4-22,
`5:9-14, 5:54-56, 6:5-10,
`6:25-28, 6:32-35, 6:49-63,
`6:67-7:7, 7:10-19, 7:22-35,
`7:44-49, 7:52-57, 7:60-67,
`8:1-2, 8:18-19, 8:23-27,
`8:36-41, 8:57-60, 9:21-34,
`9:38-42, 10:3-8, 10:11-14,
`10:30-34, 10:58-61, 11:4-26,
`11:31-45, 11:57-60, 12:45-
`50, 12:57-60, 13:40-51,
`13:59-64, 14:1-6, 14:20-27,
`14:40-47, 16:18-21, 16:38-
`44, 17:65-18:6, 18:44-49,
`19:12-15, 19:25-27, 19:34-
`38, 19:55-63, 20:4-9, 21:38-
`40, 21:53-56, 21:66-22:2,
`22:28-31, 22:40-50, 22:54-
`63, 22:67-23:10, 23:17-21,
`
`10
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 11 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 12 of 28
`
`23:48-56, 23:57-24:7, 24:12-
`19, 27:43-61, 28:9-48, 29:15-
`32, 30:4-26
`’936 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:25-44, 1:50-
`54, 2:16-22, 3:47-49, 4:1-17,
`5:1-5, 5:43-45, 5:62-67,
`6:12-17, 6:20-24, 6:37-50,
`6:59-7:24, 7:41-55, 8:1-5,
`8:9-12, 8:22-36, 8:42-45,
`9:6-12, 9:58:62, 11:5-21,
`11:29-31, 12:15-18, 13:1-21,
`13:26-32, 14:2-7, 14:19-25,
`15:62-64, 16:15-21, 17:22-
`26, 17:44-49, 18:9-11, 18:19-
`24, 18:43-47, 18:50-54,
`18:64-20:25, 21:23-26,
`21:35-38, 21:64-67, 22:8-17,
`22:21-30, 22:34-43, 23:14-
`40, 23:44-51, 24:4-7, 26:41-
`46, 27:5-22, 27:51-28:6,
`28:28-45
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:27-46, 1:53-
`57, 2:19-25, 3:47-52, 4:4-20,
`5:4-8, 5:47-49, 5:65-6:3,
`6:15-20, 6:23-27, 6:40-7:8,
`7:11-27, 7:46-49, 7:51-58,
`8:6-8, 8:11-15, 8:25-30,
`8:29-41, 8:45-48, 9:9-31,
`9:55-10:1, 10:37-43, 10:53-
`54, 10:60-11:7, 11:12-25,
`
`11
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 12 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 13 of 28
`
`11:37-39, 12:24-41, 13:13-
`26, 13:30-60, 14:3-10, 15:40-
`48, 15:60-16:6, 16:66-17:6,
`17:17-23, 18:28-35, 18:42-
`19:63, 20:58-61, 21:3-6,
`21:32-35, 21:43-52, 21:56-
`65, 22:2-11, 22:48-56, 22:57-
`62, 22:64-23:7, 23:12-19,
`23:39-42, 26:7-12, 26:37-51,
`26:60-27:64, 28:1-16, 28:30-
`43, 29:3-5, 29:20-22, 29:33-
`37, 29:60-64, 30:8-11, 30:29-
`31, 30:39-45, 31:3-5, 31:16-
`20, 31:42-44, 31:55-58,
`32:11-14, 32:25-28, 33:22-24
`’936 File History at
`RTDAPP0002068-069
`’862 File History at
`RTDAPP0004940-941
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 2, 8-17,
`20-22, 26-28, 30-36, 46-47,
`50-55, 57-58, 73, 75, 81-85,
`94, 102-103, 106
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158 at
`Abs., 2:36-40, 3:46-55, 5:7-
`12, 5:38-50, 14:38-51, 15:16-
`28, 17:54-65, 18:60-19:12,
`19:36-53
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. No.
`6,601,104 at Abs., 2:10-18,
`12
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 13 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 14 of 28
`
`2:28-40, 2:45-49, 2:54-56,
`3:20-28, 5:5-19, 13:9-22,
`13:55-65, 17:32-52, 18:5-20
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Glen E. Clarke, Ed Tetz, &
`Timothy Warner, CompTIA
`A+ Certification: All-in-One
`for Dummies 63, 65, 165-
`182, 230, 252-257, 540, 545-
`546, 676-678, 751 (2016)
`
`Bruce Jacob, Spencer W. Ng,
`& David T. Wang, Memory
`Systems: Cache, DRAM,
`Disk 1-5, 11-14, 34-38
`(2008)
`
`Andrew N. Sloss, Dominic
`Symes, & Chris Wright, Arm
`System Developer’s Guide:
`Designing and Optimizing
`System Software 9-11, 403-
`407 (2004)
`
`Michael F. Hordeski, The
`Illustrated Dictionary of
`Microcomputers 221-223 (3d
`ed. 1990)
`
`See also intrinsic and
`extrinsic evidence at least for
`
`13
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 14 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 15 of 28
`
`“second
`memory”
`(cls. 6, 8, 39,
`63, 67)
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Indefinite
`
`element “cache” / “cache
`memory.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:22-52, 2:3-7,
`2:15-21, 3:49-52, 4:4-22,
`5:9-14, 5:54-56, 6:5-10,
`6:25-28, 6:32-35, 6:49-63,
`6:67-7:7, 7:10-19, 7:22-35,
`7:44-49, 7:52-57, 7:60-67,
`8:1-2, 8:18-19, 8:23-27,
`8:36-41, 8:57-60, 9:21-34,
`9:38-42, 10:3-8, 10:11-14,
`10:30-34, 10:58-61, 11:4-26,
`11:31-45, 11:57-60, 12:45-
`50, 12:57-60, 13:40-51,
`13:59-64, 14:1-6, 14:20-27,
`14:40-47, 16:18-21, 16:38-
`44, 17:65-18:6, 18:44-49,
`19:12-15, 19:25-27, 19:34-
`38, 19:55-63, 20:4-9, 21:38-
`40, 21:53-56, 21:66-22:2,
`22:28-31, 22:40-50, 22:54-
`63, 22:67-23:10, 23:17-21,
`
`14
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 15 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 16 of 28
`
`23:48-56, 23:57-24:7, 24:12-
`19, 27:43-61, 28:9-48, 29:15-
`32, 30:4-26
`’936 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:25-44, 1:50-
`54, 2:16-22, 3:47-49, 4:1-17,
`5:1-5, 5:43-45, 5:62-67,
`6:12-17, 6:20-24, 6:37-50,
`6:59-7:24, 7:41-55, 8:1-5,
`8:9-12, 8:22-36, 8:42-45,
`9:6-12, 9:58:62, 11:5-21,
`11:29-31, 12:15-18, 13:1-21,
`13:26-32, 14:2-7, 14:19-25,
`15:62-64, 16:15-21, 17:22-
`26, 17:44-49, 18:9-11, 18:19-
`24, 18:43-47, 18:50-54,
`18:64-20:25, 21:23-26,
`21:35-38, 21:64-67, 22:8-17,
`22:21-30, 22:34-43, 23:14-
`40, 23:44-51, 24:4-7, 26:41-
`46, 27:5-22, 27:51-28:6,
`28:28-45
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs.7a-10, 1:27-46, 1:53-
`57, 2:19-25, 3:47-52, 4:4-20,
`5:4-8, 5:47-49, 5:65-6:3,
`6:15-20, 6:23-27, 6:40-7:8,
`7:11-27, 7:46-49, 7:51-58,
`8:6-8, 8:11-15, 8:25-30,
`8:29-41, 8:45-48, 9:9-31,
`9:55-10:1, 10:37-43, 10:53-
`54, 10:60-11:7, 11:12-25,
`
`15
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 16 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 17 of 28
`
`11:37-39, 12:24-41, 13:13-
`26, 13:30-60, 14:3-10, 15:40-
`48, 15:60-16:6, 16:66-17:6,
`17:17-23, 18:28-35, 18:42-
`19:63, 20:58-61, 21:3-6,
`21:32-35, 21:43-52, 21:56-
`65, 22:2-11, 22:48-56, 22:57-
`62, 22:64-23:7, 23:12-19,
`23:39-42, 26:7-12, 26:37-51,
`26:60-27:64, 28:1-16, 28:30-
`43, 29:3-5, 29:20-22, 29:33-
`37, 29:60-64, 30:8-11, 30:29-
`31, 30:39-45, 31:3-5, 31:16-
`20, 31:42-44, 31:55-58,
`32:11-14, 32:25-28, 33:22-24
`’936 File History at
`RTDAPP0002068-069
`’862 File History at
`RTDAPP0004940-941
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 2, 8-17,
`20-22, 26-28, 30-36, 46-47,
`50-55, 57-58, 73, 75, 81-85,
`94, 102-103, 106
`U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,158 at
`Abs., 2:36-40, 3:46-55, 5:7-
`12, 5:38-50, 14:38-51, 15:16-
`28, 17:54-65, 18:60-19:12,
`19:36-53
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. No.
`6,601,104 at Abs., 2:10-18,
`16
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 17 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 18 of 28
`
`2:28-40, 2:45-49, 2:54-56,
`3:20-28, 5:5-19, 13:9-22,
`13:55-65, 17:32-52, 18:5-20
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Glen E. Clarke, Ed Tetz, &
`Timothy Warner, CompTIA
`A+ Certification: All-in-One
`for Dummies 63, 65, 165-
`182, 230, 252-257, 540, 545-
`546, 676-678, 751 (2016)
`
`Bruce Jacob, Spencer W. Ng,
`& David T. Wang, Memory
`Systems: Cache, DRAM,
`Disk 1-5, 11-14, 34-38
`(2008)
`
`Andrew N. Sloss, Dominic
`Symes, & Chris Wright, Arm
`System Developer’s Guide:
`Designing and Optimizing
`System Software 9-11, 403-
`407 (2004)
`
`Michael F. Hordeski, The
`Illustrated Dictionary of
`Microcomputers 221-223 (3d
`ed. 1990)
`
`See also intrinsic and
`extrinsic evidence at least for
`
`17
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 18 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 19 of 28
`
`Indefinite
`
`element “cache” / “cache
`memory.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608 patent at Abs., Figs. 6a-
`8b, 3:40-47, 4:4-22, 8:3-8,
`9:17-21, 9:53-10:24, 11:26-
`35, 12:15, 12:57-64, 13:29-
`40, 13:45-46, 13:61-65, 14:1-
`3, 14:10-16, 14:39-50, 15:25-
`28, 16:4-8, 17:42-47, 18:32-
`36, 19:1-5, 22:51-54, 27:43-
`61, 28:9-25, 28:34-48, 29:15-
`32, 30:4-26
`’936 patent at Abs., Figs. 6a-
`8b, 3:39-44, 4:1-17, 8:56-61,
`9:1-6, 9:35-10:6, 10:67-11:8,
`11:51, 12:24-31, 12:59-13:2,
`13:19-24, 13:26-29, 13:34-
`40, 14:19-28, 15:5-7, 15:48-
`52, 17:18-23, 18:7-11, 18:42-
`47, 22:18-21, 27:5-22
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 6a-
`8b, 3:42-47, 4:4-20, 7:59-64,
`
`18
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Realtime
`Proposal:
`“initialization” /
`“initializing”
`(cl. 11)
`
`Apple Proposal:
`“initialization” /
`“initializing” /
`“prior to
`completion of
`initialization of
`the central
`processing
`unit” / “after
`completion of
`initialization of
`the central
`processing unit
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’608: 5:34-38, 9:11-27, 9:57-
`65, 11:25-31, 12:15-14:54,
`15:20-30
`
`’608 File History: April 25,
`2005 Amendment and
`Remarks, May 6, 2005 Office
`Action, December 6, 2005
`Amendment
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`ARM Architecture Reference
`Manual A2-13 (February
`2000)
`IA-32 Intel Architecture
`Software Developer’s Manual
`- Volume 3: System
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 19 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 20 of 28
`
`9:4-9, 9:39-10:10, 11:7-15,
`11:60, 12:34-41, 13:3-13,
`13:31-35, 13:37-40, 13:45-
`50, 14:3-13, 14:50-52, 15:26-
`30, 16:62-67, 17:51-55,
`18:21-25, 21:53-56, 28:1-16
`’608 File History at
`RTDAPP0000532, 536, 539,
`555, 570, 586-587
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 2, 13, 25,
`50-52, 54, 59, 72-75, 106
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 09/775,897 published as
`U.S. Pub. No. 2001/0047473
`at Abs., ¶¶ 3, 5, 8, 17-19, 22-
`24, 43, 55, 74, 84, cls. 1, 8,
`14, 19, 24
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`
`Andrew N. Sloss, Dominic
`Symes, & Chris Wright, Arm
`System Developer’s Guide:
`Designing and Optimizing
`System Software 13-16, 375,
`381-382 (2004)
`
`Michael F. Hordeski, The
`Illustrated Dictionary of
`Microcomputers 174 (3d ed.
`1990)
`
`19
`
`Programming Guide Chapter 8
`(2000)
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 103, 523 (1996).
`The IEEE Standard Dictionary
`of Electrical and Electronics
`Terms 113 (2001).
`Tom Shanley, MindShare, Inc.
`Pentium® Pro Processor
`System Architecture Chapter 4
`(December 1996)
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 20 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 21 of 28
`
`“portion of boot
`data” / “portion
`of the boot
`data”
`(cls. 1, 6, 14,
`23, 24, 31, 32,
`33)
`
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Indefinite
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 3:35-63, 4:4-20, 9:9-14,
`11:7-15, 16:60-62, 20:43-45,
`20:58-66, 21:10-12, 21:18-
`23, 21:30-48, 21:53-22:11,
`22:18-26, 26:38-28:46,
`28:30-43, 28:50-54, 28:58-
`29:19, 29:26-29, 29:33-48,
`29:53-64, 30:1-28, 30:32-56,
`30:62-31:2, 31:30-41, 31:47-
`32:11, 32:18-34:26
`’862 File History at
`RTDAPP0004940-942
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 8-9, 13,
`50, 52, 57-58, 73
`See also intrinsic and
`extrinsic evidence at least for
`element “boot data.”
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`
`20
`
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 21 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 22 of 28
`
`“wherein the
`decompressed
`portion of boot
`data comprises
`a portion of the
`operating
`system”
`(cl. 1)
`
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Indefinite
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`10, 3:35-63, 4:4-20, 9:9-14,
`11:7-15, 16:60-62, 20:43-45,
`20:58-66, 21:10-12, 21:18-
`23, 21:30-48, 21:53-22:11,
`26:38-28:46, 28:50-54,
`28:58-29:19, 29:26-29,
`29:33-48, 29:53-64, 30:1-28,
`30:42-56, 30:62-31:2, 31:30-
`41, 32:18-34:26
`’862 File History at
`RTDAPP0004940-942
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 8-9, 11-13,
`15-16, 20-21, 50, 52, 57-58,
`73
`See also intrinsic and
`extrinsic evidence at least for
`element “boot data” and
`“portion of boot data” /
`“portion of the boot data.”
`
`“partially boot
`the computer
`system”
`(cls. 5, 8, 9)
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`
`Indefinite
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 7a-
`8b, 20:58-66, 21:10-12,
`26:38-51, 26:60-28:16,
`28:30-43, 29:6-19, 29:33-46,
`30:42-53, 30:62-31:2, 32:62-
`21
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in the
`field of computer systems.
`The substance of Dr. Wills’
`Case No. 16-cv-02595-JD
`Joint C.C. and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C – 8,880,862 Patent
`
`Realtime 2012
`Page 22 of 28
`
`

`

`Case 3:16-cv-02595-JD Document 67-3 Filed 01/06/17 Page 23 of 28
`
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`33:4, 33:24-25, 34:1-3, 34:9-
`12
`’936 File History at
`RTDAPP0002069-070
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 8-9, 11-13,
`52, 57-58, 73, 106
`
`No construction
`necessary. To the
`extent necessary, the
`term should be
`construed to have its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`“storing a
`portion of the
`operating
`system in a
`compressed
`form in a first
`memory” /
`“storing the
`additional
`portion of the
`operating
`system in the
`first memory”
`(cls. 8, 9)
`
`
`Indefinite
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`’862 patent at Abs., Figs. 1-
`5, Figs. 7a-10, 1:20-26, 3:35-
`63, 4:4-21, 5:8-11, 5:49-54,
`5:65-6:3, 6:57-59, 7:35-38,
`8:48-58, 9:9-14, 14:55-59,
`20:50-21:2, 21:8-12, 21:32-
`35, 21:42-52, 21:60-22:4,
`22:34-36, 26:60-27:8, 27:35-
`64
`’862 File History at
`RTDAPP0004940-941-942
`Incorporated U.S. Pat. Appl.
`No. 60/180,114 at 8-9, 11-13,
`20-21, 58
`
`testimony may include the
`technology of the ’862 patent,
`including the relevant state of
`the art. Dr. Wills may also
`testify regarding how a person
`of ordinary skill in the art
`would understand this claim
`term. Dr. Wills may also
`provide expert testimony to
`rebut arguments made by
`Realtime regarding claim
`construction.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`Apple may offer expert
`testimony from Dr. Craig
`Wills, who is an expert in th