`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01738
`Patent 8,880,862
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01738
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0025IP2
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 8) and
`
`PTAB’s Order of October 24, 2017 (Paper 36), Petitioner submits this Request for
`
`Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of unpatentability of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,880,862, and on Patent Owner’s Motion to Amend. Requests for Oral
`
`Argument in related IPR proceedings (IPR2016-01737 and IPR2016-01739) are
`
`being filed on this same day.
`
`With regard to this particular proceeding, Petitioner requests (without
`
`waiving consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the following
`
`issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 8–12, 14–22, 59–82, 101–104, 114–115, and 117 are
`
`obvious over Sukegawa and Dye pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`2. Whether claims 8–12, 14–22, 59–82, 101–104, 114–115, and 117 are
`
`obvious over Sukegawa, Dye, and Settsu pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`3. Whether claims 8–12, 14–22, 59–82, 101–104, 114–115, and 117 are
`
`obvious over Sukegawa, Dye, and Burrows pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103(a);
`
`4. Whether claims 8–12, 14–22, 59–82, 101–104, 114–115, and 117 are
`
`obvious over Sukegawa, Dye, Settsu, and Burrows pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a);
`
`1
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01738
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0025IP2
`5. Whether claims 8–12, 14–22, 59–82, 101–104, 114–115, and 117 are
`
`obvious over Sukegawa, Dye and Zwiegincew pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`103(a);
`
`6. Whether Patent Owner’s proposed substitute claims 174-218 are
`
`unpatentable;
`
`7. Any motions to exclude evidence by Patent Owner;
`
`8. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`9. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification. The Board
`
`has already scheduled Oral Hearing for January 8, 2018. See PTAB’s
`
`Order of October 24, 2017 (Paper 36).
`
`Petitioner also respectfully requests the ability to use audio visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen that
`
`connects to a laptop computer. Petitioner’s counsel will use a laptop computer
`
`with a VGA-type connector. In addition, Petitioner requests that an ELMO-type
`
`projector be made available for use.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Date: December 8, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01738
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0025IP2
`/Andrew B. Patrick/
`
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Jeremy Monaldo, Reg. No. 58,680
`Andrew B. Patrick, Reg. No. 63,471
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza, 60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: 202-783-5070
`F: 877-769-7945
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01738
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0025IP2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned
`
`certifies that on December 8, 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Argument was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving
`
`the email correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`Joseph F. Edell, Richard Z. Zhang, Desmond S. Jui (pro hac vice)
`Fisch Sigler LLP
`5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Fourth Floor
`Washington, DC 20015
`
`William P. Rothwell, Kayvan B. Noroozi (pro hac vice)
`Noroozi PC
`2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`
`Email: Joe.Edell.IPR@fischllp.com
`Richard.Zhang.IPR@fischllp.com
`Desmond.Jui.IPR@fischllp.com
`William@noroozipc.com
`Kayvan@noroozipc.com
`
`
`/Diana Bradley/
`
`Diana Bradley
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`(858) 678-5667
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`