`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`15. The method of claim 14, wherein the
`boot data comprises: a program code
`associated with the operating system.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 14, wherein the boot
`data comprises: a program code associated
`with the operating system.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 14, wherein the boot data
`comprises: a program code associated with the operating system), Apple contends that
`one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to
`include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied
`upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of
`Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 1 (Preamble) and 1.1 above.
`
` Claim 15
`Jones
`“the method of claim 14, wherein the boot data comprises: a program code associated with the operating
`system”
`
`
`
`
`Page 56 of 110
`
`7701
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`16. The method of claim 14, wherein the
`operating system comprises: a plurality of
`files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 14, wherein the
`operating system comprises: a plurality of
`files.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 14, wherein the operating system
`comprises: a plurality of files), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
` Claim 16
`Jones
`“The method of claim 14, wherein the operating system comprises: a plurality of files.”
`
`
`
`Page 57 of 110
`
`
`
`7702
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`17. The method of claim 14, wherein the
`boot data comprises: a program code
`associated with the operating system and
`an application program.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 14, wherein the boot
`data comprises: a program code associated
`with the operating system and an
`application program.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 14, wherein the boot data
`comprises: a program code associated with the operating system and an application
`program), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 15 above.
`
` Claim 17
`Jones
`“The method of claim 14, wherein the boot data comprises: a program code associated with the operating system and an application
`program.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 58 of 110
`
`7703
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`19.1 The method of claim 14, wherein the
`request for the boot data comprises: a
`request to access boot data that is not
`associated with the boot data list, and
`wherein the updating comprises:
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 14, wherein the
`request for the boot data comprises: a
`request to access boot data that is not
`associated with the boot data list, and
`wherein the updating comprises:”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 14, wherein the request for the
`boot data comprises: a request to access boot data that is not associated with the boot
`data list, and wherein the updating comprises:), Apple contends that one of skill in the
`art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element
`that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge
`of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
` Claim 19
`Jones
`“The method of claim 14, wherein the request for the boot data comprises: a request to access boot data that is not associated with the
`boot data list, and wherein the updating comprises:”
`
`
`
`
`Page 59 of 110
`
`7704
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`19.2 associating the accessed boot data
`that is not associated with the boot data
`list to the boot data list.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“associating the accessed boot data that is
`not associated with the boot data list to the
`boot data list”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, associating the accessed boot data that is not
`associated with the boot data list to the boot data list.), Apple contends that one of skill
`in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the
`element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 2 above.
`
` Claim 19.2
`Jones
`“associating the accessed boot data that is not associated with the boot data list to the boot data list.”
`
`
`
`Page 60 of 110
`
`
`
`7705
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`23. The method of claim 1, wherein the
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form represents a plurality of files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein the
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form represents a plurality of files.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the
`boot data in the compressed form represents a plurality of files), Apple contends that one
`of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include
`the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 16 above.
`
` Claim 23
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the boot data in the compressed form represents a plurality of
`files.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 61 of 110
`
`7706
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`24. The method of claim 1, wherein the
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form comprises: a program code
`associated with the operating system.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein the
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form comprises: a program code
`associated with the operating system.
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the
`boot data in the compressed form comprises: a program code associated with the
`operating system), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the
`operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to
`the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during
`prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 15 above.
`
` Claim 24
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein the portion of the boot data in the compressed form comprises:
`a program code associated with the operating system.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 62 of 110
`
`7707
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`27. The method of claim 1, wherein the
`memory comprises: a physical memory.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein the
`memory comprises: a physical memory.”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein the memory
`comprises: a physical memory), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
` Claim 27
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein the memory comprises: a physical memory”
`
`
`
`Page 63 of 110
`
`
`
`7708
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`28. The method of claim 1, wherein the
`operating system comprises: a plurality of
`files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein the
`operating system comprises: a plurality of
`files”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein the operating system
`comprises: a plurality of files), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 16 above.
`
` Claim 28
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein the operating system comprises: a plurality of files”
`
`
`
`Page 64 of 110
`
`
`
`7709
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`29. The method of claim 1, wherein the
`boot data comprises: a program code
`associated with the operating system and
`an application program.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein the boot
`data comprises: a program code associated
`with the operating system and an
`application program”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein the boot data
`comprises: a program code associated with the operating system and an application
`program), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 15 and 17 above.
`
` Claim 29
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein the boot data comprises: a program code associated with the
`operating system and an application program.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 65 of 110
`
`7710
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`31. The method of claim 1, wherein the
`accessing comprises: accessing the loaded
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form via direct memory access.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein the
`accessing comprises: accessing the loaded
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form via direct memory access”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein the accessing
`comprises: accessing the loaded portion of the boot data in the compressed form via
`direct memory access), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the
`operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to
`the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during
`prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
` Claim 31
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein the accessing comprises: accessing the loaded portion of the boot
`data in the compressed form via direct memory access.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 66 of 110
`
`7711
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`32. The method of claim 1, wherein a
`form of dictionary encoding was utilized
`to encode the portion of the boot data in
`the compressed form.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein a form of
`dictionary encoding was utilized to encode
`the portion of the boot data in the
`compressed form”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein a form of dictionary
`encoding was utilized to encode the portion of the boot data in the compressed form),
`Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a
`computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which
`the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See
`Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
` Claim 32
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein a form of dictionary encoding was utilized to encode the portion
`of the boot data in the compressed form.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 67 of 110
`
`7712
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`33. The method of claim 1, wherein
`Lempel-Ziv encoding was utilized to
`encode the portion of the boot data in the
`compressed form.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 1, wherein Lempel-
`Ziv encoding was utilized to encode the
`portion of the boot data in the compressed
`form”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 1, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding
`was utilized to encode the portion of the boot data in the compressed form), Apple
`contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer
`system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee
`relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and
`VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 32 above.
`
` Claim 33
`Jones
`“The method of claim 1, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding was utilized to encode the portion of the
`boot data in the compressed form.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 68 of 110
`
`7713
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`35. The method of claim 5, wherein the
`compressed boot data represents a
`plurality of files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 5, wherein the
`compressed boot data represents a
`plurality of files”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 5, wherein the compressed boot
`data represents a plurality of files), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 16 and 23 above.
`
` Claim 35
`Jones
`“The method of claim 5, wherein the compressed boot data represents a plurality of files.”
`
`
`
`Page 69 of 110
`
`
`
`7714
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`36. The method of claim 5, wherein the
`compressed boot data comprises: a
`program code associated with an
`operating system of the computer system.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 5, wherein the
`compressed boot data comprises: a
`program code associated with an operating
`system of the computer system”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 5, wherein the compressed boot
`data comprises: a program code associated with an operating system of the computer
`system), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of
`booting a computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner
`in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution.
`See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 15 and 17 above.
`
` Claim 36
`Jones
`“The method of claim 5, wherein the compressed boot data comprises: a program code associated
`with an operating system of the computer system.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 70 of 110
`
`7715
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`39. The method of claim 5, wherein the
`loading comprises: loading the stored
`compressed boot data from the first
`memory to a second memory, and
`wherein the second memory comprises: a
`physical memory.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 5, wherein the
`loading comprises: loading the stored
`compressed boot data from the first
`memory to a second memory, and wherein
`the second memory comprises: a physical
`memory”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 5, wherein the loading
`comprises: loading the stored compressed boot data from the first memory to a second
`memory, and wherein the second memory comprises: a physical memory), Apple
`contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer
`system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee
`relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and
`VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
` Claim 39
`Jones
`“The method of claim 5, wherein the loading comprises: loading the stored compressed boot data
`from the first memory to a second memory, and wherein the second memory comprises: a physical
`memory.”
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 71 of 110
`
`7716
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`40. The method of claim 36, wherein the
`operating system comprises: a plurality of
`files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 36, wherein the
`operating system comprises: a plurality of
`files”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 36, wherein the operating system
`comprises: a plurality of files), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 16 and 23 above.
`
` Claim 40
`Jones
`“The method of claim 36, wherein the operating system comprises: a plurality of files.”
`
`
`
`Page 72 of 110
`
`
`
`7717
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`43. The method of claim 5, wherein the
`accessing comprises: accessing the loaded
`compressed boot data via direct memory
`access.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 5, wherein the
`accessing comprises: accessing the loaded
`compressed boot data via direct memory
`access”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 5, wherein the accessing
`comprises: accessing the loaded compressed boot data via direct memory access), Apple
`contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer
`system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee
`relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and
`VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 31 above.
`
` Claim 43
`Jones
`“The method of claim 5, wherein the accessing comprises: accessing the loaded compressed
`boot data via direct memory access.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 73 of 110
`
`7718
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`44. The method of claim 5, wherein a
`form of dictionary encoding was utilized
`to encode the compressed boot data.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 5, wherein a form of
`dictionary encoding was utilized to encode
`the compressed boot data”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 5, wherein a form of dictionary
`encoding was utilized to encode the compressed boot data), Apple contends that one of
`skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include
`the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such
`knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s
`Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 32 above.
`
` Claim 44
`Jones
`“The method of claim 5, wherein a form of dictionary encoding was utilized to encode the
`compressed boot data.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 74 of 110
`
`7719
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`45. The method of claim 5, wherein
`Lempel-Ziv encoding was utilized to
`encode the compressed boot data.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the method of claim 5, wherein Lempel-
`Ziv encoding was utilized to encode the
`compressed boot data”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the method of claim 5, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding
`was utilized to encode the compressed boot data), Apple contends that one of skill in the
`art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element
`that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge
`of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 32 and 33 above.
`
` Claim 45
`Jones
`“The method of claim 5, wherein Lempel-Ziv encoding was utilized to encode the compressed
`boot data.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 75 of 110
`
`7720
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`47. The system of claim 6, wherein the
`boot data in the compressed form
`represents a plurality of files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the system of claim 6, wherein the boot
`data in the compressed form represents a
`plurality of files”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the system of claim 6, wherein the boot data in the
`compressed form represents a plurality of files), Apple contends that one of skill in the
`art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element
`that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge
`of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 16 and 23 above.
`
` Claim 47
`Jones
`“The system of claim 6, wherein the boot data in the compressed form represents a plurality of files.”
`
`
`
`Page 76 of 110
`
`
`
`7721
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`48. The system of claim 6, wherein the
`boot data in the compressed form
`comprises: a program code associated
`with an operating system.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the system of claim 6, wherein the boot
`data in the compressed form comprises: a
`program code associated with an operating
`system”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the system of claim 6, wherein the boot data in the
`compressed form comprises: a program code associated with an operating system),
`Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a
`computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which
`the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See
`Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 15, 17 and 24 above.
`
` Claim 48
`Jones
`“The system of claim 6, wherein the boot data in the compressed form comprises: a program code
`associated with an operating system.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 77 of 110
`
`7722
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`49. The system of claim 6, further
`comprising: an encoder configured to
`compress the boot data to provide the
`boot data in the compressed form.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the system of claim 6, further
`comprising: an encoder configured to
`compress the boot data to provide the boot
`data in the compressed form”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the system of claim 6, further comprising: an encoder
`configured to compress the boot data to provide the boot data in the compressed form),
`Apple contends that one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a
`computer system to include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which
`the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See
`Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claim 10 above.
`
` Claim 49
`Jones
`“The system of claim 6, further comprising: an encoder configured to compress the boot data to
`provide the boot data in the compressed form.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 78 of 110
`
`7723
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`50. The system of claim 6, further
`comprising: a decoder configured to
`decompress the boot data in the
`compressed form.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the system of claim 6, further
`comprising: a decoder configured to
`decompress the boot data in the
`compressed form”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the system of claim 6, further comprising: a decoder
`configured to decompress the boot data in the compressed form), Apple contends that
`one of skill in the art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to
`include the element that is missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied
`upon such knowledge of skill in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of
`Apple’s Invalidity Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`“Custom video and audio hardware for the set-top box contains a MPEG-
`2 decoder, NTSC (the U.S. and Japanese analog television encoding
`standard) encoders & decoders, a tuner, and an audio mixer.”
`
`Jones, §3.
`
`“Everything from server machines and ATM switches to real-time
`MPEG-2 encoders and OS software was precisely duplicated.”
`
`Jones, §11.
`
` Claim 50
`Jones
`“The system of claim 6, further comprising: a decoder configured to decompress the boot data in the
`compressed form.”
`
`
`
`
`Page 79 of 110
`
`7724
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`51. The system of claim 6, wherein the
`first memory comprises: a physical
`memory.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the system of claim 6, wherein the first
`memory comprises: a physical memory”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the system of claim 6, wherein the first memory
`comprises: a physical memory), Apple contends that one of skill in the art would
`understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element that is
`missing similar to the manner in which the patentee relied upon such knowledge of skill
`in the art during prosecution. See Sections VI. and VII. of Apple’s Invalidity
`Contentions.
`
`Jones discloses this limitation:
`
`See Claims 27 and 39 above.
`
` Claim 51
`Jones
`“The system of claim 6, wherein the first memory comprises: a physical memory.”
`
`
`
`Page 80 of 110
`
`
`
`7725
`
`
`
`
`
`Appendix C32
`Invalidity of U.S. Patent 8,880,862 based on Jones
`
`52. The system of claim 6, wherein the
`boot data the compressed form comprises:
`a plurality of files.
`
`Jones, as evidenced by the example
`citations below, discloses
`“the system of claim 6, wherein the boot
`data the compressed form comprises: a
`plurality of files”
`To the extent that Realtime contends this reference does not explicitly disclose this
`element of this claim (for example, the system of claim 6, wherein the boot data the
`compressed form comprises: a plurality of files), Apple contends that one of skill in the
`art would understand the operation of booting a computer system to include the element
`that is missing similar to the manner in
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
