UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Papst Licensing GMBH & CO. KG,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case No: IPR2016-017331
`U.S. Patent No. 9,189,437
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE
`WITH RESPECT TO LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`                                                            
`1 IPR2017-01038 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`

`

` 
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317, 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74, and the Board’s
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`authorization of November 28, 2017, Petitioner LG Electronics, Inc. (“LG”) and
`
`Patent Owner Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Patent Owner” or “Papst”)
`
`jointly move to terminate the present inter partes review proceeding with respect
`
`to LG in light of Patent Owner and LG’s settlement of their dispute regarding U.S.
`
`Patent No. 9,189,437 (“the ’437 patent”).
`
`LG and Patent Owner are concurrently filing a true and complete copy of
`
`their written Settlement Agreement (Confidential Exhibit 2013) in connection with
`
`this matter as required by the statute. LG and Patent Owner certify that there are
`
`no other agreements or understandings, oral or written, between the parties,
`
`including any collateral agreements, made in connection with, or in contemplation
`
`of, the termination of the present proceeding with respect to LG. A joint request to
`
`treat the Settlement Agreement as business confidential information kept separate
`
`from the file of the involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) is being filed
`
`concurrently.
`
` 
`
`2
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`LEGAL STANDARD
`
`An inter partes review proceeding “shall be terminated with respect to any
`
`petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the
`
`Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination
`
`is filed.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). A joint motion to terminate generally “must (1)
`
`include a brief explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all
`
`parties in any related litigation involving the patents at issue; (3) identify any
`
`related proceedings currently before the Office, and (4) discuss specifically the
`
`current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each
`
`party to the litigation or proceeding.” Heartland Tanning, Inc. v. Sunless, Inc.,
`
`IPR2014-00018, Paper No. 26, at *2 (P.T.A.B. July 28, 2014).
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Termination of the present inter partes review proceeding with respect to LG
`
`is appropriate because (1) LG and Patent Owner have settled their dispute regarding
`
`the ’437 patent and have agreed to terminate the proceeding with respect to LG, (2)
`
`the Office has not yet decided the merits of the proceeding, (3) the termination with
`
`resepct to LG will not materially affect the proceeding, and (4) public policy favors
`
`the termination.
`
`First, the Settlement Agreement completely resolves the controversy
`
`between Patent Owner and LG relating to the ’437 patent. LG Electronics USA,
`
` 
`
`3
`
`

`

` 
`Inc., and LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc., which are two of the real parties
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`in interest in the present proceeding, were named defendants in Papst Licensing
`
`GmbH & Co. KG v. Apple Inc., No. 6:15-cv-1095-RWS (E.D. Tex) and the
`
`consolidated case Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. LG Electronics, Inc., No.
`
`6:15-cv-1099-RWS (E.D. Tex.). On November 27, 2017, the district court granted
`
`the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss, dismissing all the claims asserted by Papst
`
`against the LG entities, and all counterclaims asserted by the LG entities against
`
`Papst, with prejudice. Papst Licensing v. Apple Inc., 6:15-cv-1095-RWS (E.D.
`
`Tex.) (Dkt. No. 674).
`
`Second, although the Board has instituted trial (Paper 7) and held an oral
`
`hearing, the Office has not decided the merits of the proceeding.
`
`Third, the termination with respect to LG will not materially affect the
`
`proceeding. LG originally filed a separate petition for inter partes review.
`
`IPR2017-01038, Paper 1. On March 6, 2017, LG filed a motion requesting that its
`
`petition be instituted and the proceeding joined with this proceeding. IPR2017-
`
`01038, Paper 3. In its Motion for Joinder, LG agreed
`
`to incorporate its filings with those of the Samsung Petitioners into a
`consolidated filing in the Samsung IPR, unless the filing involves an
`issue unique to LG or states a point of disagreement related to the
`consolidated filing. In such circumstances, LG proposes to make a
`separate filing of no more than five pages.
`
` 
`
`4
`
`

`

` 
`
`Id. at 14. LG further agreed “to take a subordinate ‘understudy’ role in
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`discovery.” Id. To date, LG has not identified any issues unique to LG, has not had
`
`any disagreement related to any consolidated filing, and has not made any separate
`
`filings. Because of LG’s subordinate role, this termination will not impact the
`
`proceedings. The proceeding is therefore expected to continued with the remaining
`
`petitioners.
`
`Fourth, public policy favors the termination. As recognized by the rules of
`
`practice before the Board:
`
`There are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement
`between the parties to a proceeding. The Board will be
`available to facilitate settlement discussions, and where
`appropriate, may require a settlement discussion as part
`of the proceeding. The Board expects that a proceeding
`will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement,
`unless the Board has already decided the merits of the
`proceeding.
`
`Patent Office Trial Practice Guide, Fed. Register, Vol. 77, No. 157 at 48768 (Aug.
`
`14, 2012). Moreover, no public interest or other factors militate against
`
`termination of this proceeding with respect to LG.
`
`As to the remaining Heartland Tanning requirements, Exhibit A identifies
`
`each district court litigation that involves the ’437 patent or any related patents and
`
`discusses the current status of these related litigations. Exhibit B identifies all
`
` 
`
`5
`
`

`

` 
`petitions for Inter Partes Review that have been filed against the ’437 patent or
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`any related patent and discusses the status of each.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, LG and Patent Owner jointly and respectfully
`
`request that the instant proceeding be terminated with respect to LG.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: November 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: / Herbert H. Finn /
`
`Herbert H. Finn
`Registration No. 38,139
`Jonathan E. Giroux
`Registration No. 66,639
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`77 W. Wacker Dr., Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(202) 662-6000
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner LG Electronics,
`Inc.
`
`By: /Nicholas T. Peters/
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Registration No. 53,456
`Paul B. Henkelmann
`Registration No. 65,891
`FITCH, EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY,
`LLP
`120 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 1600
`Chicago, IL 60603
`
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Exhibit A
`Status of Litigation Involving U.S. Patent No. 9,189,437 or Related Patents
`Case Caption
`Status
`In Re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litigation,
`Pending
`MDL No. 1880 (Misc. Action No. 07-493) relating to Nos.
`07-cv-1118, 07-cv-1222, 07-cv-2086, 07-cv-2088, 08-cv-865,
`08-cv-985, 08-cv-1406, and 09-cv-530
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. HP, Inc., Case No.
`3:16-cv-00575 (N.D. Cal.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Apple, Inc., Case No.
`6:15-cv-01095 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Huawei Technologies
`Co., Ltd. et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01115 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Lenovo (United States),
`Inc. et al., Case. No. 6:15-cv-01111 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. LG Electronics, Inc. et
`al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01099 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Samsung Electronics
`Co. Ltd. et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-01102 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. ZTE Corporation et al.,
`Case. No. 6:15-cv-01100 (E.D. Tex.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Canon, Inc. et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-01692 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Fujifilm Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01693 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. JVCKENWOOD
`Corporation et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01747 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Nikon Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01748 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Olympus Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01749 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Panasonic Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-01750 (D.D.C.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Canon, Inc., et al., Case
`No. 1:15-cv-00495 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Fujifilm Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00496 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. HP, Inc., Case No.
`1:15-cv-00497 (D. Del.)
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending
`
`Pending/Stayed
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Terminated
`
`Pending/Stayed
`
` 
`
` 
`
`7
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Case Caption
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. JVCKENWOOD
`Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00498 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Nikon Corporation, et
`al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00499 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Olympus Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00500 (D. Del.)
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co., KG v. Panasonic Corporation,
`et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00501 (D. Del.)
`Hewlett-Packard Company v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG, Case. No. 3:15-cv-02101 (N.D. Cal.)
`
`Status
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Pending
`
`Terminated
`
`8
`
` 
`
`
`
` 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Exhibit B
`Status of Petitions for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,189,437 or
`Related Patents
`
`Status
`Patent
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`
`Caption
`No.
`IPR2016-01199 Fujifilm Corporation et al. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01200 Fujifilm Corporation et al. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01202 Canon Inc., Canon USA Inc., and
`Canon Financial Services, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01206 Canon Inc., Canon USA Inc., and
`Canon Financial Services, Inc. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01211 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01212 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`
`9
`
` 
`
` 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01213 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01214 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`10
`
` 
`
` 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01216 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01222 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01223 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`
`11
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`
`8,966,144
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
` 
`
` 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01224 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01225 Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
`Canon Financial Services, Inc.,
`Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm
`Holdings America Corporation,
`Fujifilm North America
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood
`Corporation, JVC Kenwood USA
`Corporation, Nikon Corporation,
`Nikon Inc., Olympus Corporation,
`Olympus America Inc., Panasonic
`
`12
`
` 
`
` 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
` 
`
` 
`
`No.
`
`Caption
`Corporation, Panasonic
`Corporation of North America,
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co.
`KG
`IPR2016-01733 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
`and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2016-01839 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01840 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01841 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01842 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01843 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01844 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01849 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01860 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01862 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01863 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2016-01864 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00154 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00156 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00158 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`
`13
`
`Patent
`
`Status
`
`9,189,437 Trial
`Instituted
`
`9,189,437
`
`9,189,437
`
`6,470,399
`
`9,189,437
`
`8,966,144
`
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`9,189,437 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`8,966,144
`
`9,189,437
`
`8,504,746
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Caption
`No.
`IPR2017-00415 Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA)
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2017-00443 Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA)
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2017-00448 Huawei Device Co., Ltd., LG
`Electronics, Inc., and ZTE (USA)
`Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH &
`Co. KG
`IPR2017-00449 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v.
`Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00670 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00672 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-00678 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-00679 Apple Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00710 Huawei Device Co. Ltd. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00711 ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00712 ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`IPR2017-00713 ZTE (USA) Inc. v. Papst Licensing
`GmbH & Co. KG
`
`14
`
`Status
`Patent
`6,895,449 Trial
`Instituted
`
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`
`6,895,449
`
`Institution
`Denied
`
`8,504,746
`
`Institution
`Denied
`8,966,144 Terminated
`
`8,966,144 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2016-
`01225
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2016-
`01211
`8,966,144 Terminated
`
`8,966,144
`
`8,504,746 Trial
`Instituted
`Institution
`Denied
`Institution
`Denied
`6,895,449 Trial
`Instituted
`
`9,189,437
`
` 
`
` 
`
`

`

`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`Status
`Patent
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted
`
`9,189,437 Trial
`Instituted -
`joined with
`IPR2016-
`01733
`6,895,449 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2017-
`00415
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2017-
`00443
`6,470,399 Trial
`Instituted –
`joined with
`IPR2017-
`00714
`
` 
`
`Caption
`No.
`IPR2017-00714 ZTE (USA) Inc. and ZTE
`Corporation v. Papst Licensing
`GmbG & Co. KG
`IPR2017-01038 LG Electronics, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-01617 Olympus Corporation and
`Olympus American Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-01682 Olympus Corporation and
`Olympus America Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`IPR2017-01808 Olympus Corporation, Olympus
`America Inc., Samsung Electronics
`Co., Ltd., and Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc. v. Papst
`Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

` 
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE IN IPR2016-01733
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,189,437
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on November
`
`28, 2017, a complete and entire copy of the foregoing paper has been served in its
`
`entirety by e-mail on the following addresses of record for Petitioner:
`
`LG-Papst-IPR@gtlaw.com
`
`finnh@gtlaw.com
`
`girouxj@gtlaw.com
`
`Brian.Rupp@dbr.com
`
`Carrie.Beyer@dbr.com
`
`Nick.Colic@dbr.com
`
`
`
`Dated: November 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/Nicholas T. Peters/
`Nicholas T. Peters
`Registration No. 53,456
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`ntpete@fitcheven.com
`
`
`
` 
`
`16
`
`