`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and LG
`Electronics, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, IPR2016-01733
`Petition Based On U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,081 (“Aytac”)
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 1
`
`
`
`U.S. Pat. No. 9,189,437 (“the ’437 Patent”)
`
` Title: “Analog Data Generating and Processing Device
`
`having a Multi-Use Automatic Processor”
`
` Named Inventor: Michael Tasler
`
` Owner: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
` Earliest asserted priority date: March 4, 1997
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01733 Overview
`
` Challenged Claims: 1-45 (1, 39, 41, and 43 are independent)
`
` Grounds of Unpatentability: Challenged Claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a):
`
`Claims
`
`References
`
`1, 4-16, 18-31, 33-37, 41, 43, 45
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA
`
`2, 3, 17, 39, 40, 42, 44
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, Adaptec
`
`13, 45
`
`32
`
`38
`
`40
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, TI Data Sheet
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, Muramatsu
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, TI Data Sheet, TI Patent
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, Adaptec, TI Data Sheet
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Institution Dec. at 39-40.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01733 Outline
`
` Uncontested Issues
`
` Contested Issues
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`“Without requiring any end user to load software” – All Independent Claims
`
`“Single A/D Converter” – Claims 39 & 41
`
`3. Simultaneous Acquisition – Claim 41
`
`4. Customary Driver in BIOS – Claim 41
`
`5. TI Data Sheet
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 4
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 5
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: Aytac Is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,081
`
` Title: “Computing and Communications Transmitting,
`
`Receiving System, With a Push Button Interface,
`
`That Is Continuously On, That Pairs Up With a
`
`Personal Computer and Carries Out Mainly Communications
`
`Related Routine Tasks”
`
` Named Inventor: Haluk M. Aytac
`
` Filed: December 8, 1995
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`Ex. 1004; Pet. at 4; see Resp. at 12-17.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 6
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: SCSI Specification Is Prior Art
`
` Title: “American National Standard for Information
`
`Systems, Small Computer System Interface-2, ANSI
`
`X3.131-1994
`
` Published: 1994
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1005; Pet. at 5; see Resp. at 19-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 7
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: Muramatsu is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,256
`
` Title: “Photometry Device for a Camera”
`
` Named Inventor: Muramatsu
`
` Filed: May 29, 1996
`
` Issued: January 7, 1997
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1008; Pet. at 6.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 8
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: Adaptec is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,690
`
` Title: “Programmably Configurable Host Adapter
`
`Integrated Circuit Including a RISC Processor”
`
` Named Inventor: Stuber
`
` Filed: October 15, 1992
`
` Issued: August 19, 1997
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and 102(e)
`
`Ex. 1009; Pet. at 6.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 9
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: TI Patent is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,071
`
` Title: “Operational Amplifier with Digitally
`
`Programmable Gain Circuitry on the Same Chip”
`
` Named Inventor: Westmoreland
`
` Filed: January 15, 1993
`
` Issued: June 28, 1994
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1013; Pet. at 7.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 10
`
`
`
`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[Preamble] An analog data generating and
`processing device (ADGPD)…
`
`[a] an input/output (i/o) port
`
`[b] a program memory
`
`[c] a data storage memory
`
`[d] processor operatively interfaced…
`
`[e][1] processor is adapted to implement a data
`generation process…
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 22-30; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 11
`
`
`
`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[e][2] the analog data is processed
`
`[e][3] the data is stored as at least one file
`
`[f][1] the processor is adapted to be involved in an
`automatic recognition process (ARP)…
`
`[f][2] ARP occurs when operative interfaced
`
`[f][3] in ARP, processor causes at least one
`parameter to be sent to host
`
`[f][4] parameter identifies ADGPD as digital storage
`device, independent of analog source
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 30-37; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 12
`
`
`
`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[f][5] in ARP, the parameter is sent through i/o port
`to host’s multi-purpose interface
`
`[f][6] ARP occurs without requiring end user to load
`any software on the host computer
`
`[f][7] ARP occurs without setting up a file system in
`the ADGPD
`
`[f][8] in ARP, the parameter is consistent with
`ADGPD responding to customary driver
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`[g] parameter provides file transfer characteristics
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 37-40; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 13
`
`
`
`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[h][1] processor involved in automatic file transfer
`process (AFTP)
`
`Patent Owner only contested sub-part [h][7] of the
`AFTP
`
`[h][2] AFTP occurs when operatively interfaced
`
`[h][3] AFTP occurs after parameter sent to the host
`
`[h][4] instruction set executed for data transfer
`
`[h][5] AFTP transfers at least one file of digitized
`analog data
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 40-43; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 14
`
`
`
`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[h][6] AFTP occurs using customary driver while
`ADGPD appears as if it were a digital storage device
`
`YES
`
`[h][7] AFTP occurs without requiring loading or
`installing file transfer enabling software
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 43-44; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 15
`
`
`
`Sole Contested Claim Limitations: Claim 39
`
`Claim 39
`
`analog to digital converter
`
`transferring the digitized acquired analog data . . .
`without requiring the user to load the customary
`device driver
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA +
`Adaptec?
`
`Contested
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 69-70; See Resp. at 61-62.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 16
`
`
`
`Sole Contested Claim Limitations: Claim 41
`
`Claim 41
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`transfer the digitized analog data . . . using the
`customary device driver present in the BIOS of the
`host computer
`
`an analog to digital converter
`
`manufacturer installed BIOS
`
`Contested
`
`Contested
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 68-69; See Resp. at 56-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 17
`
`
`
`Sole Contested Claim Limitations: Claim 43
`
`Claim 43
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`transferring the digitized analog data . . . without
`requiring the user to load the device driver
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 44; See Resp. at 55-56.
`
`Resp. at 56.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 18
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: Dependent Limitations
`*The only contested dependent claim limitation is found in
`
`Claim
`
`Additional
`Limitations
`Disclosed?
`
`claim 8.
`
`2-7
`
`8
`
`9-38
`
`40
`
`42
`
`44
`
`45
`
`YES
`
`Contested*
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Pet. at 45-80; See Resp. at 63-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`See Resp. at 63-64.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 19
`
`
`
`The Parties Essentially Agree on the Level of
`Ordinary Skill
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Resp. at 23; see also Pet. at 20; Institution Dec. at 15.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 20
`
`
`
`Uncontested Issues: Aytac Expressly Cites the
`SCSI Specification
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1004 at 4:49-54, 9:56-63;
`Pet. at 44-45; See generally
`Resp.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 21
`
`
`
`Disputed Issue #1
`“AFTP occurs without requiring loading or installing file transfer enabling
`software”
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 22
`
`
`
`“Automatic File Transfer” Limitations: Language
`from Each Independent Claim
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 39
`
`Claim 41
`
`Claim 43
`
`wherein the processor is
`further adapted to be
`involved in an automatic file
`transfer process . . . using
`the customary device driver
`for the digital storage
`device . . . without requiring
`any user-loaded file transfer
`enabling software to be
`loaded on or installed in the
`computer at any time
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`using the customary device
`driver present for a digital
`storage device in the host
`computer without requiring
`the user to load the
`customary device driver
`
`using the customary device
`driver present in the BIOS of
`the host computer for the
`digital mass storage device
`in the host computer
`without requiring the user to
`load the customary device
`driver
`
`using the customary device
`driver present for the
`customary digital storage
`device in the host computer
`without requiring the user to
`load the device driver
`
`Ex. 1003; Resp. at 42-43.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 23
`
`
`
`“Automatic File Transfer” Limitations: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Aytac discloses precisely what the ’437 Patent claims
`as its “invention”: a device which interfaces a host
`computer and peripherals using standard SCSI
`connections, drivers, and protocols.
`
`Aytac discloses other features, but software enabling
`those features is not required for the ’437 Patent’s
`claimed “automatic file transfer.”
`
`Pet. at 1, 12-15, 32-44; Reply at 1-3, 4-7, 12-22.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 24
`
`
`
`“Automatic File Transfer”: Argument Roadmap
`
`1. Claim Construction (Slides 26-32)
`
`‒ “Without requiring” does not mean “prohibiting” the existence of any user-loaded software
`
`‒ The claims require the ability to transfer one file / data
`
`‒ The claims do not require “synchronization” of current access requests or “reliability”
`
`2. Aytac’s System Does Not Require User-Loaded File Transfer Software (Slides 33-38)
`
`‒ Aytac discloses automatic file transfer using SCSI, just like the ’437 Patent
`
`‒ Patent Owner does not dispute how Aytac uses SCSI
`
`3.
`
`Patent Owner’s Argument is Wrong (Slides 39-48)
`
`‒ The expert witnesses agree on what Aytac’s software does
`
`‒ CATSYNC.VXD’s synchronization and cache clearing are not required to transfer one file / data
`
`‒ CATCAS.EXE and CATSER.VXD perform irrelevant functions
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 25
`
`
`
`“Without Requiring” Does Not Mean “Prohibiting”
`
`Reply at 21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 26
`
`
`
`Claim 1 Only Requires the Ability to Transfer One
`File
`
`Institution Dec. at 24.
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 1).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 27
`
`
`
`Claims 39, 41, 43 Only Require Ability to Transfer
`Data
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 39).
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 43).
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 41).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 28
`
`
`
`“Automatic File Transfer” Limitation - PO Expert
`Testimony on Similar Tasler Patent Limitation
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,966,144 (claim 1); Reply at 6-8
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 1).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 29
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Expert: “Without Requiring” Does Not
`Mean “Prohibiting”
`
`Ex. 1016 at 53:7-21; Reply at 6, 20-21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 30
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Expert: Ability to Transfer One File
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex 1016 at 51:23-52:5; Reply at 4-5.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 31
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Expert: “Automatic File Transfer”
`Limitation Does Not Require “Reliability”
`
`Ex 1016 at 52:7-10; Reply at 6-8
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 32
`
`
`
`Aytac Meets the “Without Requiring” Limitation
`Aytac’s CaTBoX System
`
`Ex. 1004, Figure 1; Pet. at
`1, 12-15, 32-44; Reply at
`4-7, 12-22.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 33
`
`
`
`Aytac Meets the “Without Requiring” Limitation
`Aytac discloses automatic file transfer using SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Pet. at 38, 40
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1004 at 10:52-55; 12:7-9
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 34
`
`
`
`Aytac Meets the “Without Requiring” Limitation
`Aytac’s system does not require software on the computer beyond standard SCSI drivers
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 109.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 35
`
`
`
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent
`Transfer a File the Same Way
`’437 Patent
`
`Aytac
`
`Ex. 1003 at Fig. 1; Ex. 1004 at Fig. 1; Pet. at 1, 12-15, 32-44; Reply
`at 4-7, 12-22.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 36
`
`
`
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent
`Transfer a File the Same Way
`
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent use the same SCSI interface
`
`’437 Patent
`
`Aytac
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:51-55; Ex. 1004 at 9:64-10:2; Pet. at 12-15, 22-24, 29-30, 32-44.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 37
`
`
`
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent
`Transfer a File the Same Way
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent use the same SCSI drivers (“ASPI” drivers)
`
`’437 Patent
`
`’144 Patent
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex 1003 at 10:23-33; Ex 1004 at 10:52-58; Pet. at 15, 32-43, 68, 70,
`73.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 38
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Mischaracterizes Petitioner’s
`Argument: No Modification of Aytac Is Required
`
`Resp. at 53; see also Resp. at 3-4, 6, 36-42, 45-47.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 39
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Says: Aytac Requires User-Loaded
`Software for Cache Clearing & Synchronization
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Resp. at 40.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 40
`
`
`
`Patent Owner Says: Aytac Requires User-Loaded
`Software for Cache Clearing & Synchronization
`
`Ex. 1016 at 48:13-24; Resp. at 36-42, 45-54; see
`Reply at 18-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 41
`
`
`
`Cache Clearing Necessarily Only Occurs
`After a Successful File Transfer
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Ex. 2006 at ¶ 46.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 42
`
`
`
`Cache Clearing Necessarily Only Occurs
`After a Successful File Transfer
`
`Ex. 1016 at 46:21-47:10; Reply at 19.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 43
`
`
`
`“Synchronization” Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`It is not necessary to address concurrent access attempts to transfer a file
`
`Ex. 1016 at 48:2-11; Reply at 19-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 44
`
`
`
`“Synchronization” Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`It is not necessary to address concurrent access attempts to transfer a file
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 101; Pet. at 40-44; Reply at 1-2, 13-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 45
`
`
`
`“Synchronization” Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`It is not necessary to address concurrent access attempts to transfer a file
`
`Ex. 2007 at 92:7-20; see also id. at 90:3-22, 98:3-8; Reply at
`13-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 46
`
`
`
`CATCAS.EXE Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1016 at 49:7-14; Ex. 1004 at 11:6-13; Reply at 16 n.11.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 47
`
`
`
`CATSER.VXD Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`
`Aytac
`
`Ex. 1004 at 11:38-39; Ex. 1016 at 49:17-50:4; Reply at 16 n.11.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 48
`
`
`
`Disputed Issue #2
`Single A/D Converter – Claims 39 & 41
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 49
`
`
`
`A/D Converter: Relevant Claim Language
`
`Claim 39
`
`Claim 41
`
`an analog to digital converter . . . configured to acquire analog
`data from each respective analog acquisition channel of a
`plurality of analog acquisition channels
`
`an analog to digital converter . . . configured to
`simultaneously acquire analog data from each respective
`analog source of a plurality of analog sources on a respective
`one of a plurality of independent analog acquisition channels
`
`Ex. 1003 (claims 39, 41); Resp. at 56-62.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 50
`
`
`
`A/D Converter: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Claims 39 and 41 are not limited to a single A/D
`converter.
`
`Aytac discloses A/D converters for each analog
`acquisition channel.
`
`Pet. at 68-69; Reply at 1-3, 7-9, 23-25.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 51
`
`
`
`Claim Does Not Require a Single A/D Converter
`
`Patent Owner knew how to draft claims that require a single feature.
`
`Compare Ex. 1003, claim 41:
`
`With Ex. 1003, claim 28:
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`See Reply at 7-9.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 52
`
`
`
`Claim Does Not Require a Single A/D Converter
`
`Patent Owner’s “single A/D converter” violates its own stated “rule.”
`
`Ex. 1015 at 2; Reply at 8.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 53
`
`
`
`Aytac Discloses the Claimed A/D Converter
`
`Pet. at 68.
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 54
`
`
`
`Disputed Issue #3
`Simultaneous Acquisition – Claim 41
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 55
`
`
`
`Simultaneous Acquisition: Relevant Claim
`Language
`
`Claim 41
`
`an analog to digital converter . . . configured to
`simultaneously acquire analog data from each respective
`analog source of a plurality of analog sources on a respective
`one of a plurality of independent analog acquisition channels
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 41); Resp. at 56-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 56
`
`
`
`Simultaneous Acquisition: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Aytac discloses multiple analog acquisition channels
`being simultaneously connected to the CaTbox.
`
`The analog signals are digitized by A/D converters
`before the CaTbox can process the data.
`
`Pet. at 12-13, 27, 29, 68, Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124; Reply 23-24.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 57
`
`
`
`Aytac Discloses Multiple Analog Channels
`
`Pet. at 12-13; Ex. 1001 at ¶¶ 41-42; see
`also Pet. at Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 58
`
`
`
`Aytac Discloses Multiple Analog Channels
`
`Pet. at 29; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 85; see also
`Pet. at Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 59
`
`
`
`Aytac Discloses Simultaneous Acquisition by A/D Converters
`
`Pet. at 68, Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 119.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 60
`
`
`
`Aytac’s Multiple Channels Are Connected to CaTbox Bus
`
`Pet. at 27; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 83; see also
`Pet. at Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 2; Ex. 1001, ¶ 83.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 61
`
`
`
`Aytac’s Multiple Channels Are Simultaneously Sampled
`
`Reply at 9.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 2008 at 51:14-20.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 62
`
`
`
`Disputed Issue #4
`Customary Driver in BIOS – Claim 41
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 63
`
`
`
`Customary Driver in BIOS: Relevant Claim
`Language
`
`Claim 41
`
`processor communicating with the host computer . . . using
`the customary device driver present in the BIOS of the host
`computer for the digital mass storage device in the host
`computer
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 41); Resp. at 56-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 64
`
`
`
`Customary Driver in BIOS: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Aytac, like the ’437 patent, discloses ASPI drivers to
`transfer digitized data to the host computer.
`
`The ’437 patent acknowledges that a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would have known that ASPI
`drivers could be integrated in the BIOS of a host
`computer.
`
`Pet. at 68-69.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 65
`
`
`
`Under § 103: Obvious to Include the ASPI Drivers in the
`Host’s BIOS
`
`Pet. at 68.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:37-39.
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:64-67.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 66
`
`
`
`Disputed Issue #5
`TI Data Sheet Is Prior Art
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 67
`
`
`
`Status of TI Data Sheet as Prior Art: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`TI Data Sheet was publicly available at least as early
`as October 1996.
`
`Pet. at 5-6; Reply at 9-12.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 68
`
`
`
`TI Data Sheet – Dated October 1996 & Copyright 1996
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 6; Ex. 1007, p. 1.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 69
`
`
`
`TI Data Sheets Were Reasonably Accessible
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 48.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 70
`
`
`
`Nearly Identical TI Data Sheet in Data Book Dated 1989
`
`Ex. 1007 at 1; Reply at 11.
`
`Ex. 1017 at 1; Reply at 11.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 71
`
`
`
`Conclusion
`Claims 1-45 Are Unpatentable
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 72
`
`