throbber
Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and LG
`Electronics, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, IPR2016-01733
`Petition Based On U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,081 (“Aytac”)
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 1
`
`

`

`U.S. Pat. No. 9,189,437 (“the ’437 Patent”)
`
` Title: “Analog Data Generating and Processing Device
`
`having a Multi-Use Automatic Processor”
`
` Named Inventor: Michael Tasler
`
` Owner: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
`
` Earliest asserted priority date: March 4, 1997
`
`Ex. 1003
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01733 Overview
`
` Challenged Claims: 1-45 (1, 39, 41, and 43 are independent)
`
` Grounds of Unpatentability: Challenged Claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a):
`
`Claims
`
`References
`
`1, 4-16, 18-31, 33-37, 41, 43, 45
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA
`
`2, 3, 17, 39, 40, 42, 44
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, Adaptec
`
`13, 45
`
`32
`
`38
`
`40
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, TI Data Sheet
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, Muramatsu
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, TI Data Sheet, TI Patent
`
`Aytac, SCSI Spec, AAPA, Adaptec, TI Data Sheet
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Institution Dec. at 39-40.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01733 Outline
`
` Uncontested Issues
`
` Contested Issues
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`“Without requiring any end user to load software” – All Independent Claims
`
`“Single A/D Converter” – Claims 39 & 41
`
`3. Simultaneous Acquisition – Claim 41
`
`4. Customary Driver in BIOS – Claim 41
`
`5. TI Data Sheet
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 4
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 5
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Aytac Is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,758,081
`
` Title: “Computing and Communications Transmitting,
`
`Receiving System, With a Push Button Interface,
`
`That Is Continuously On, That Pairs Up With a
`
`Personal Computer and Carries Out Mainly Communications
`
`Related Routine Tasks”
`
` Named Inventor: Haluk M. Aytac
`
` Filed: December 8, 1995
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)
`
`Ex. 1004; Pet. at 4; see Resp. at 12-17.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 6
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: SCSI Specification Is Prior Art
`
` Title: “American National Standard for Information
`
`Systems, Small Computer System Interface-2, ANSI
`
`X3.131-1994
`
` Published: 1994
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1005; Pet. at 5; see Resp. at 19-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 7
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Muramatsu is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,256
`
` Title: “Photometry Device for a Camera”
`
` Named Inventor: Muramatsu
`
` Filed: May 29, 1996
`
` Issued: January 7, 1997
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1008; Pet. at 6.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 8
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Adaptec is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,690
`
` Title: “Programmably Configurable Host Adapter
`
`Integrated Circuit Including a RISC Processor”
`
` Named Inventor: Stuber
`
` Filed: October 15, 1992
`
` Issued: August 19, 1997
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and 102(e)
`
`Ex. 1009; Pet. at 6.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 9
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: TI Patent is Prior Art
`
` U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,071
`
` Title: “Operational Amplifier with Digitally
`
`Programmable Gain Circuitry on the Same Chip”
`
` Named Inventor: Westmoreland
`
` Filed: January 15, 1993
`
` Issued: June 28, 1994
`
` Prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`Ex. 1013; Pet. at 7.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 10
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[Preamble] An analog data generating and
`processing device (ADGPD)…
`
`[a] an input/output (i/o) port
`
`[b] a program memory
`
`[c] a data storage memory
`
`[d] processor operatively interfaced…
`
`[e][1] processor is adapted to implement a data
`generation process…
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 22-30; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 11
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[e][2] the analog data is processed
`
`[e][3] the data is stored as at least one file
`
`[f][1] the processor is adapted to be involved in an
`automatic recognition process (ARP)…
`
`[f][2] ARP occurs when operative interfaced
`
`[f][3] in ARP, processor causes at least one
`parameter to be sent to host
`
`[f][4] parameter identifies ADGPD as digital storage
`device, independent of analog source
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 30-37; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 12
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[f][5] in ARP, the parameter is sent through i/o port
`to host’s multi-purpose interface
`
`[f][6] ARP occurs without requiring end user to load
`any software on the host computer
`
`[f][7] ARP occurs without setting up a file system in
`the ADGPD
`
`[f][8] in ARP, the parameter is consistent with
`ADGPD responding to customary driver
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`[g] parameter provides file transfer characteristics
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 37-40; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 13
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[h][1] processor involved in automatic file transfer
`process (AFTP)
`
`Patent Owner only contested sub-part [h][7] of the
`AFTP
`
`[h][2] AFTP occurs when operatively interfaced
`
`[h][3] AFTP occurs after parameter sent to the host
`
`[h][4] instruction set executed for data transfer
`
`[h][5] AFTP transfers at least one file of digitized
`analog data
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 40-43; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 14
`
`

`

`Uncontested Claim Limitations: Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`[h][6] AFTP occurs using customary driver while
`ADGPD appears as if it were a digital storage device
`
`YES
`
`[h][7] AFTP occurs without requiring loading or
`installing file transfer enabling software
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 43-44; See Resp. at 35-54.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 15
`
`

`

`Sole Contested Claim Limitations: Claim 39
`
`Claim 39
`
`analog to digital converter
`
`transferring the digitized acquired analog data . . .
`without requiring the user to load the customary
`device driver
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA +
`Adaptec?
`
`Contested
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 69-70; See Resp. at 61-62.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 16
`
`

`

`Sole Contested Claim Limitations: Claim 41
`
`Claim 41
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`transfer the digitized analog data . . . using the
`customary device driver present in the BIOS of the
`host computer
`
`an analog to digital converter
`
`manufacturer installed BIOS
`
`Contested
`
`Contested
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 68-69; See Resp. at 56-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 17
`
`

`

`Sole Contested Claim Limitations: Claim 43
`
`Claim 43
`
`Disclosed by Aytac + SCSI Specification + AAPA?
`
`transferring the digitized analog data . . . without
`requiring the user to load the device driver
`
`Contested
`
`Pet. at 44; See Resp. at 55-56.
`
`Resp. at 56.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 18
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Dependent Limitations
`*The only contested dependent claim limitation is found in
`
`Claim
`
`Additional
`Limitations
`Disclosed?
`
`claim 8.
`
`2-7
`
`8
`
`9-38
`
`40
`
`42
`
`44
`
`45
`
`YES
`
`Contested*
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`YES
`
`Pet. at 45-80; See Resp. at 63-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`See Resp. at 63-64.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 19
`
`

`

`The Parties Essentially Agree on the Level of
`Ordinary Skill
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Resp. at 23; see also Pet. at 20; Institution Dec. at 15.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 20
`
`

`

`Uncontested Issues: Aytac Expressly Cites the
`SCSI Specification
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1004 at 4:49-54, 9:56-63;
`Pet. at 44-45; See generally
`Resp.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 21
`
`

`

`Disputed Issue #1
`“AFTP occurs without requiring loading or installing file transfer enabling
`software”
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 22
`
`

`

`“Automatic File Transfer” Limitations: Language
`from Each Independent Claim
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 39
`
`Claim 41
`
`Claim 43
`
`wherein the processor is
`further adapted to be
`involved in an automatic file
`transfer process . . . using
`the customary device driver
`for the digital storage
`device . . . without requiring
`any user-loaded file transfer
`enabling software to be
`loaded on or installed in the
`computer at any time
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`using the customary device
`driver present for a digital
`storage device in the host
`computer without requiring
`the user to load the
`customary device driver
`
`using the customary device
`driver present in the BIOS of
`the host computer for the
`digital mass storage device
`in the host computer
`without requiring the user to
`load the customary device
`driver
`
`using the customary device
`driver present for the
`customary digital storage
`device in the host computer
`without requiring the user to
`load the device driver
`
`Ex. 1003; Resp. at 42-43.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 23
`
`

`

`“Automatic File Transfer” Limitations: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Aytac discloses precisely what the ’437 Patent claims
`as its “invention”: a device which interfaces a host
`computer and peripherals using standard SCSI
`connections, drivers, and protocols.
`
`Aytac discloses other features, but software enabling
`those features is not required for the ’437 Patent’s
`claimed “automatic file transfer.”
`
`Pet. at 1, 12-15, 32-44; Reply at 1-3, 4-7, 12-22.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 24
`
`

`

`“Automatic File Transfer”: Argument Roadmap
`
`1. Claim Construction (Slides 26-32)
`
`‒ “Without requiring” does not mean “prohibiting” the existence of any user-loaded software
`
`‒ The claims require the ability to transfer one file / data
`
`‒ The claims do not require “synchronization” of current access requests or “reliability”
`
`2. Aytac’s System Does Not Require User-Loaded File Transfer Software (Slides 33-38)
`
`‒ Aytac discloses automatic file transfer using SCSI, just like the ’437 Patent
`
`‒ Patent Owner does not dispute how Aytac uses SCSI
`
`3.
`
`Patent Owner’s Argument is Wrong (Slides 39-48)
`
`‒ The expert witnesses agree on what Aytac’s software does
`
`‒ CATSYNC.VXD’s synchronization and cache clearing are not required to transfer one file / data
`
`‒ CATCAS.EXE and CATSER.VXD perform irrelevant functions
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 25
`
`

`

`“Without Requiring” Does Not Mean “Prohibiting”
`
`Reply at 21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 26
`
`

`

`Claim 1 Only Requires the Ability to Transfer One
`File
`
`Institution Dec. at 24.
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 1).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 27
`
`

`

`Claims 39, 41, 43 Only Require Ability to Transfer
`Data
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 39).
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 43).
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 41).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 28
`
`

`

`“Automatic File Transfer” Limitation - PO Expert
`Testimony on Similar Tasler Patent Limitation
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,966,144 (claim 1); Reply at 6-8
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 1).
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 29
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Expert: “Without Requiring” Does Not
`Mean “Prohibiting”
`
`Ex. 1016 at 53:7-21; Reply at 6, 20-21.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 30
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Expert: Ability to Transfer One File
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex 1016 at 51:23-52:5; Reply at 4-5.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 31
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Expert: “Automatic File Transfer”
`Limitation Does Not Require “Reliability”
`
`Ex 1016 at 52:7-10; Reply at 6-8
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 32
`
`

`

`Aytac Meets the “Without Requiring” Limitation
`Aytac’s CaTBoX System
`
`Ex. 1004, Figure 1; Pet. at
`1, 12-15, 32-44; Reply at
`4-7, 12-22.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 33
`
`

`

`Aytac Meets the “Without Requiring” Limitation
`Aytac discloses automatic file transfer using SCSI protocols and drivers
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Pet. at 38, 40
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1004 at 10:52-55; 12:7-9
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 34
`
`

`

`Aytac Meets the “Without Requiring” Limitation
`Aytac’s system does not require software on the computer beyond standard SCSI drivers
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 109.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 35
`
`

`

`Aytac and the ’437 Patent
`Transfer a File the Same Way
`’437 Patent
`
`Aytac
`
`Ex. 1003 at Fig. 1; Ex. 1004 at Fig. 1; Pet. at 1, 12-15, 32-44; Reply
`at 4-7, 12-22.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 36
`
`

`

`Aytac and the ’437 Patent
`Transfer a File the Same Way
`
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent use the same SCSI interface
`
`’437 Patent
`
`Aytac
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:51-55; Ex. 1004 at 9:64-10:2; Pet. at 12-15, 22-24, 29-30, 32-44.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 37
`
`

`

`Aytac and the ’437 Patent
`Transfer a File the Same Way
`Aytac and the ’437 Patent use the same SCSI drivers (“ASPI” drivers)
`
`’437 Patent
`
`’144 Patent
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex 1003 at 10:23-33; Ex 1004 at 10:52-58; Pet. at 15, 32-43, 68, 70,
`73.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 38
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Mischaracterizes Petitioner’s
`Argument: No Modification of Aytac Is Required
`
`Resp. at 53; see also Resp. at 3-4, 6, 36-42, 45-47.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 39
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Says: Aytac Requires User-Loaded
`Software for Cache Clearing & Synchronization
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Resp. at 40.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 40
`
`

`

`Patent Owner Says: Aytac Requires User-Loaded
`Software for Cache Clearing & Synchronization
`
`Ex. 1016 at 48:13-24; Resp. at 36-42, 45-54; see
`Reply at 18-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 41
`
`

`

`Cache Clearing Necessarily Only Occurs
`After a Successful File Transfer
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Ex. 2006 at ¶ 46.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 42
`
`

`

`Cache Clearing Necessarily Only Occurs
`After a Successful File Transfer
`
`Ex. 1016 at 46:21-47:10; Reply at 19.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 43
`
`

`

`“Synchronization” Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`It is not necessary to address concurrent access attempts to transfer a file
`
`Ex. 1016 at 48:2-11; Reply at 19-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 44
`
`

`

`“Synchronization” Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`It is not necessary to address concurrent access attempts to transfer a file
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 101; Pet. at 40-44; Reply at 1-2, 13-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 45
`
`

`

`“Synchronization” Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`It is not necessary to address concurrent access attempts to transfer a file
`
`Ex. 2007 at 92:7-20; see also id. at 90:3-22, 98:3-8; Reply at
`13-20.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 46
`
`

`

`CATCAS.EXE Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`
`Aytac
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1016 at 49:7-14; Ex. 1004 at 11:6-13; Reply at 16 n.11.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 47
`
`

`

`CATSER.VXD Is Not Required for Automatic
`File Transfer
`
`Aytac
`
`Ex. 1004 at 11:38-39; Ex. 1016 at 49:17-50:4; Reply at 16 n.11.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 48
`
`

`

`Disputed Issue #2
`Single A/D Converter – Claims 39 & 41
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 49
`
`

`

`A/D Converter: Relevant Claim Language
`
`Claim 39
`
`Claim 41
`
`an analog to digital converter . . . configured to acquire analog
`data from each respective analog acquisition channel of a
`plurality of analog acquisition channels
`
`an analog to digital converter . . . configured to
`simultaneously acquire analog data from each respective
`analog source of a plurality of analog sources on a respective
`one of a plurality of independent analog acquisition channels
`
`Ex. 1003 (claims 39, 41); Resp. at 56-62.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 50
`
`

`

`A/D Converter: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Claims 39 and 41 are not limited to a single A/D
`converter.
`
`Aytac discloses A/D converters for each analog
`acquisition channel.
`
`Pet. at 68-69; Reply at 1-3, 7-9, 23-25.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 51
`
`

`

`Claim Does Not Require a Single A/D Converter
`
`Patent Owner knew how to draft claims that require a single feature.
`
`Compare Ex. 1003, claim 41:
`
`With Ex. 1003, claim 28:
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`See Reply at 7-9.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 52
`
`

`

`Claim Does Not Require a Single A/D Converter
`
`Patent Owner’s “single A/D converter” violates its own stated “rule.”
`
`Ex. 1015 at 2; Reply at 8.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 53
`
`

`

`Aytac Discloses the Claimed A/D Converter
`
`Pet. at 68.
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 54
`
`

`

`Disputed Issue #3
`Simultaneous Acquisition – Claim 41
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 55
`
`

`

`Simultaneous Acquisition: Relevant Claim
`Language
`
`Claim 41
`
`an analog to digital converter . . . configured to
`simultaneously acquire analog data from each respective
`analog source of a plurality of analog sources on a respective
`one of a plurality of independent analog acquisition channels
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 41); Resp. at 56-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 56
`
`

`

`Simultaneous Acquisition: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Aytac discloses multiple analog acquisition channels
`being simultaneously connected to the CaTbox.
`
`The analog signals are digitized by A/D converters
`before the CaTbox can process the data.
`
`Pet. at 12-13, 27, 29, 68, Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124; Reply 23-24.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 57
`
`

`

`Aytac Discloses Multiple Analog Channels
`
`Pet. at 12-13; Ex. 1001 at ¶¶ 41-42; see
`also Pet. at Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 58
`
`

`

`Aytac Discloses Multiple Analog Channels
`
`Pet. at 29; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 85; see also
`Pet. at Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 1.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 59
`
`

`

`Aytac Discloses Simultaneous Acquisition by A/D Converters
`
`Pet. at 68, Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 119.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 60
`
`

`

`Aytac’s Multiple Channels Are Connected to CaTbox Bus
`
`Pet. at 27; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 83; see also
`Pet. at Appx. p. 6; Ex. 1001 at ¶ 124.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1004, Fig. 2; Ex. 1001, ¶ 83.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 61
`
`

`

`Aytac’s Multiple Channels Are Simultaneously Sampled
`
`Reply at 9.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 2008 at 51:14-20.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 62
`
`

`

`Disputed Issue #4
`Customary Driver in BIOS – Claim 41
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 63
`
`

`

`Customary Driver in BIOS: Relevant Claim
`Language
`
`Claim 41
`
`processor communicating with the host computer . . . using
`the customary device driver present in the BIOS of the host
`computer for the digital mass storage device in the host
`computer
`
`Ex. 1003 (claim 41); Resp. at 56-61.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 64
`
`

`

`Customary Driver in BIOS: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`Aytac, like the ’437 patent, discloses ASPI drivers to
`transfer digitized data to the host computer.
`
`The ’437 patent acknowledges that a person of
`ordinary skill in the art would have known that ASPI
`drivers could be integrated in the BIOS of a host
`computer.
`
`Pet. at 68-69.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 65
`
`

`

`Under § 103: Obvious to Include the ASPI Drivers in the
`Host’s BIOS
`
`Pet. at 68.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:37-39.
`
`Ex. 1003 at 3:64-67.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 66
`
`

`

`Disputed Issue #5
`TI Data Sheet Is Prior Art
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 67
`
`

`

`Status of TI Data Sheet as Prior Art: Argument
`
`Petitioner’s Argument
`
`TI Data Sheet was publicly available at least as early
`as October 1996.
`
`Pet. at 5-6; Reply at 9-12.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 68
`
`

`

`TI Data Sheet – Dated October 1996 & Copyright 1996
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Pet. at 6; Ex. 1007, p. 1.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 69
`
`

`

`TI Data Sheets Were Reasonably Accessible
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Ex. 1001 at ¶ 48.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 70
`
`

`

`Nearly Identical TI Data Sheet in Data Book Dated 1989
`
`Ex. 1007 at 1; Reply at 11.
`
`Ex. 1017 at 1; Reply at 11.
`
`Samsung v. Papst, IPR2016-01733
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 71
`
`

`

`Conclusion
`Claims 1-45 Are Unpatentable
`
`Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.
`Exhibit 1018, p. 72
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket