throbber
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 76, No. 8, pp. 4071-4074, August 1979
`Immunology
`
`Crystal structure of galactan-binding mouse immunoglobulin J539
`Fab at 4.5-A resolution
`(x-ray diffraction/pattern recognition/antibody structure)
`MANUEL A. NAVIA*, DAVID M. SEGAL*t, EDUARDO A. PADLAN*t, DAVID R. DAVIES*, NARAYANA RAO§,
`STUART RUDIKOFF§, AND MICHAEL POTTER§
`*Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism and Digestive Diseases; and §Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute,
`National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20205
`Contributed by David R. Davies, May 11, 1979
`
`ABSTRACT
`An electron-density map of the mouse galac-
`tan-binding immunoglobulin 1539 (IgA2,K) Fab has been cal-
`culated to a resolution of 4.5 A by the method of heavy atom
`isomorphous replacement with four derivatives. The map has
`been interpreted with the aid of a com uter program which
`systematically searched for the best fit between the electron-
`density map and the known coordinates of individual immu-
`noglobulin domains. The quaternary structure of J539 Fab at
`this resolution appears similar to that of another mouse immu-
`noglobulin, IgA2,K Fab, McPC603. The model coordinates for
`J539 Fab should allow us to proceed directly to a high-resolution
`structure determination without further heavy atom isomor-
`phous replacement.
`The crystal structures of three immunoglobulin Fabs have been
`reported (1-3). One of these, the mouse myeloma protein
`McPC603, belongs to a class of immunoglobulins that bind
`specifically to phosphocholine. In this paper, we present the
`results of.a structural analysis at 4.5-A resolution of a second
`mouse Fab, the galactan-binding immunoglobulin J539. A
`molecular model has been constructed with the aid of a com-
`puter search procedure used previously in the interpretation
`of the electron-density map of an intact immunoglobulin (4).
`The model allows us to describe the quaternary structural in-
`teractions between the constituent domains and domain pairs
`of the J539 Fab and reveals a general similarity
`to
`McPC603.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`The immunoglobulin J539 [a mouse IgA2,K; anti-(1-',6)-
`/-D-galactan] was isolated and purified as described (5), and
`pepsin fragments were obtained by using a published procedure
`(6).
`Crystals of J539 Fab were grown at room temperature from
`35% saturated solutions of ammonium sulfate containing 0.07
`M imidazole and 0.03 M zinc sulfate at pH 6.8. The crystals
`exhibit the symmetry of space group P212121 with unit cell
`dimensions: a = 54.1 A, b = 74.2, A, and c = 130.8 A. They
`diffract to a resolution of at least 2.5 A. Prior to further work,
`the crystals were transferred into stabilizing solution (45%
`saturated ammonium sulfate/0.07 M imidazole/0.03 M zinc
`sulfate, pH 6.8). On rare occasions, a second crystal form was
`observed in the space group P212121 with unit cell dimensions:
`a = 55.7 A, b = 74.1 A, and c = 125.7 A. Cocrystallization in
`the presence of the haptens (1- 6)-f3-D-galactodiose (Gal2) and
`(1-6)-f3-D-galactotetraose (Gal4), both kindly provided by
`C.P.J. Glaudemans, yielded a needle-like crystal form which
`remains uncharacterized.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "ad-
`vertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate
`this fact.
`
`4071
`
`0.500
`
`'7C
`
`U = 0.000
`
`v
`
`I
`I
`
`1.)1
`
`,'D
`
`U = 0.500
`Cs
`
`w
`
`w
`
`B .'O~
`
`A
`
`Q1
`
`U.WU_ *
`0,000
`
`V
`
`(E
`
`0.500
`
`L. "I
`
`n nnnl-
`0.000
`
`V
`
`0.500
`
`Sections through the difference Patterson map for the
`FIG. 1.
`K2Pt(CNS)6 derivative, showing the Harker peaks (A, B, and C).
`Contours are at 1/40ths of origin peak; zero and negative contours are
`omitted.
`
`Useful heavy atom derivatives were obtained by soaking J539
`Fab crystals in stabilizing solutions with 0.25 mM K2Pt(CNS)6
`for 2 weeks, 1 mM K2PtCl4 for 1 week, 0.3 mM K2HgI4 for 2
`weeks, and 50 mM KI/1 mM chloramine-T (Eastman Kodak)
`for 1 week. The iodine-derivatized crystals were washed with
`fresh stabilizing solution after the soaking period. Unique sets
`of three-dimensional reflection data to 4.5-A spacings were
`collected from native and derivative crystals with a Picker
`FACS-1 diffractometer operated in the T-scan mode and using
`Cu Ka radiation. The various data sets were placed on the same
`relative scale, and pseudo temperature factors were applied to
`correct for differences in intensity fall-off. The K2Pt(CNS)6
`derivative was analyzed first, and difference Patterson maps,
`readily interpretable, revealed one site of substitution (Fig. 1).
`After preliminary refinement with projection data only, the
`coordinates and occupancy of the K2Pt(CNS)6 site were used
`to determine the signs of the centric native protein reflections.
`These signs were used to examine the K2PtCI4 and K2HgI4
`derivatives by difference Fourier analysis. The variables for
`these three heavy atom derivatives were then subjected to al-
`ternating cycles of least squares refinement and phase deter-
`mination with the three-dimensional data. The resulting phases
`
`t Present address: Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute.
`t Present address: Biophysics Department, Johns Hopkins University,
`Baltimore, MD.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1084 Page 1 of 4
`
`

`
`4072
`
`Immunology: Navia et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979)
`
`Table 1. Heavy atom variables after refinement
`Isotropic
`temperature
`factor,
`A2
`
`Derivative
`K2Pt(CNS)6
`K2PtCl4
`
`K2HgI4
`Iodine
`
`Rct
`0.507
`0.590
`
`0.606
`0.587
`
`Rkl
`0.068
`0.068
`
`0.070
`0.116
`
`E§
`0.95
`0.89
`
`0.92
`1.62
`
`Fractional coordinates
`Rel.
`X
`occupancy*
`Site
`Z
`Y
`1.00
`1
`0.0437
`0.2320
`0.0624
`22.1
`0.51
`1
`0.0477
`0.2304
`0.0627
`18.8
`0.6143
`0.51
`2
`0.0333
`0.3444
`25.1
`0.62
`1
`0.0550
`0.6346
`0.3477
`25.6
`0.62
`1
`0.4514
`0.5425
`0.5867
`25.6
`0.96
`0.8920
`2
`0.6349
`0.4008
`13.0
`0.32
`0.1535
`0.2927
`3
`0.3469
`22.2
`* The site occupancies are on an arbitrary scale with the K2Pt(CNS)6 site assigned an occupancy of 1.00.
`t R, = I FpH - Fp -FH /I FPH - Pp, in which the sums are over centric reflections only.
`tRk = ZIFpHI - IFp+FHII/ZIFPHI.
`§ E is the root mean square lack of closure error. The average protein structure amplitude is 10.3.
`were subsequently used to analyze the iodine derivative. The
`refined variables of the four heavy atom derivatives are listed
`in Table 1. The mean figure-of-merit for the 1895 phased re-
`flections is 0.82. "Best" (7) Fourier maps were computed by
`using these phases.
`Two methods were used to interpret this map.
`(i) Visual examination of the map, making use of the known
`structure of McPC603. In addition, because K2Pt(CNS)6 bound
`also to McPC603 where it was attached to the constant region
`of the molecule (8) and because the constant regions of
`McPC603 and J539 Fab are most probably identical, it was
`assumed that Pt(CNS)6- bound to the same site in both mole-
`cules, thus providing a known location in J539 from which to
`start the interpretation.
`(ii) The overall three-dimensional structures of the domains
`of McPC603 were assumed to be similar to those of J539. A
`computer program was accordingly used to rotate and translate
`exhaustively the known coordinates of the domains of McPC603
`Fab (9) into the electron-density map of J539; after each such
`transformation, they were compared with the density. The
`criterion of fit was the number of overlaps of transformed
`
`coordinates on the electron density. This program was originally
`used-in the interpretation of the electron-density map of the
`intact immunoglobulin "Dob" (4) and will be described in detail
`elsewhere. The translations of the domains were conducted
`along the three orthogonal axes with increments of 2 A at 6.0-A
`resolution and of 1.5 A at 4.5-A resolution. The rotations were
`computed by varying the three Eulerian angles with increments
`of 300 at 6.0-A resolution and of 15° at 4.5-A resolution (these
`increments were decreased as the final fit solution was ap-
`proached). To further limit the scope of the search, the coor-
`dinates of McPC603 heavy chain residue 148, which in McPC
`603 was near the K2Pt(CNS)6 binding site, was tethered to
`within 20 A of the coordinates of the platinum binding site in
`the J539 electron-density map, again on the assumption that
`both molecules have the same Pt binding site.
`For the initial search at 6-A resolution, the constant region
`domain pair (CH1-CL) of McPC603 Fab was used as a unit.
`Afterwards, the variable region domain pair (VH-VL) was used
`as a unit, with the hypervariable residues (10) for the light chain,
`26-34, 50-55, and 92-96, and for the heavy chain, 31-35,
`51-59, and 97-100, omitted because they could be expected
`to differ between McPC603 and J539. At this stage of the search,
`only a-carbon coordinates were used in order to minimize
`computer time and the amount of memory used. All searches
`were conducted on a PDP 11/70 computer which has an ad-
`dressing limit of 32,000 words.
`The 6-A resolution results were refined by searches of the
`4.5-A resolution J539 map. This time, however, the individual
`McPC6O3 domains (CHI, CL, VH, VL) were fitted separately.
`An idealized (11) polyalanine structure, generated from the
`McPC603 backbone coordinates and again excluding hyper-
`variable residues, was used in the search. Typical results for the
`two searches are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 2. An indication
`of the precision of the fit obtained by this procedure can be
`
`Table 2.
`
`Comparison of search results using the CH1-CL domain
`pair at two resolutions
`
`Resolution,
`A
`
`Peak height
`Overlaps,* no.
`above mean,
`No. of atoms
`used in search Maximum Mean
`SD
`3.9
`93
`46
`208
`6
`305
`4.8
`503
`4.5
`1020
`The Euler angle 01 was systematically varied about the final
`CH1-CL domain-pair solution; all other rotation/translation variables
`were kept fixed.
`* "Overlaps" refer to the number of coordinates found to superimpose
`on electron density above a specified level (see text).
`
`280
`
`260
`
`240|
`
`220
`
`200
`
`0 180
`
`160-
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100
`0
`
`40
`
`80
`
`200
`240
`160
`120
`Increments, degrees
`Overlap of domain pair CH1-CL on the J539 4.5-A elec-
`FIG. 2.
`tron-density map as a function of the single Eulerian angle 01. The
`angle was systematically varied in 1° intervals over its full range with
`all other rotation and translation variables fixed at their maximal
`overlap values.
`
`280
`
`320
`
`360
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1084 Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`Immunology: Navia et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979)
`
`4073
`
`Sections through the 4.5-A electron-density map of J539 perpendicular to the Y (74.2 A) axis, with model polyalanine coordinates
`FIG. 3.
`superimposed. The sections shown are from y = 0.06 to y = 0.16. Solid and open circles, heavy and light chains, respectively; arrows, ends of
`the independently fitted VH and CH1 domains that have to be joined at the switch region.
`obtained from the Euler angle solutions presented in Table 3.
`The search procedure described above was carried out in-
`Another estimate of the precision of fit might be obtained from
`dependently of the visual interpretation and ultimately led to
`the width of the curve in Fig. 2. A quantitative estimate is dif-
`a best fit solution (Figs. 3 and 4). We have calculated structure
`factors and crystallographic R factors for the molecular models
`ficult, however, because the error cannot be demonstrated to
`resulting from both the high- and low-resolution searches (Table
`have a normal distribution but seems to depend rather on the
`4). These numbers compare favorably with the R factors of
`form and pseudosymmetry of the fitted molecule. The solution
`other structures at similar stages of their solution (12-15).
`peak for the 6-A search was broader than that for the 4.5-A
`In the search procedure at 4.5-A resolution, the individual
`search, thus justifying the use of a coarser and more economical
`domains were fitted separately and their final positions in the
`sampling scheme at the lower resolution.
`model correspond to the highest peak of overlap. Nothing in
`this search procedure constrains the separate domains to a
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`well-behaved and consistent solution. It is therefore reassuring
`Examination of more than 50 heavy atom compounds yielded
`that the domains do not interpenetrate. Also, the packing of the
`only the four usable derivatives of Table 1. For reasons that
`molecules in the unit cell, taking into account the symmetry
`were not apparent, these derivatives were of significantly poorer
`elements of the space group P212121, provides an arrangement
`quality than those used for the comparable McPC603 analysis
`in which neighboring molecules do not share density but nev-
`(8), and their use led to an electron-density map in which the
`ertheless appear to make sufficient intermolecular contacts to
`contrast between protein and solvent regions was low, so that
`sustain a crystal lattice.
`the molecular boundary was not immediately apparent. An
`attempt to interpret this map visually based on the positions of
`the heavy atom derivatives, particularly K2Pt(CNS)6, and the
`known structure of McPC603 Fab resulted in a tentative de-
`lineation of the molecular boundary. However, interpretation
`of the electron-density map in specific molecular terms ne-
`cessitated a more quantitative approach.
`
`Table 3.
`
`01
`
`"Best-fit" Euler angles at two resolutions and for the
`constant domains taken separately and in pairs
`CH1
`CH1-CL
`CL
`Resolution,
`A
`02
`01
`03
`02
`02
`105
`6
`99
`336
`4.5
`99
`113
`332
`334
`100
`106
`111
`110
`328
`The electron-density maps used in the search procedure were
`sampled at one-third the resolution indicated.
`
`03
`
`01
`
`03
`
`Stereo view of the Ca skeleton of the J539 Fab structure.
`FIG. 4.
`Open circles, McPC603 hypervariable residues that were excluded
`from the search.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1084 Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`4074
`
`Immunology: Navia et al.
`Table 4.
`Crystallographic R factors for the J539 models
`Temperature
`factor,
`A2
`50
`25
`
`Resolution,
`A
`6
`4.5
`
`Coordinates Reflections
`a-Carbon
`934
`Polyalanine
`2167
`
`R factor,
`%
`44.7
`46.5
`
`The final configuration of the model is such that natural
`connections can be made easily between the variable and
`constant halves of the heavy and light chains, respectively. The
`polypeptide chains at this "switch region" (16) of the molecule
`can readily be linked to provide a reasonable connection (Fig.
`3), there being no constraints that would necessitate an addition
`or deletion of residues.
`The elbow bend, the angle between the pseudo 2-fold sym-
`metry axes that skewer the constant and variable domain pairs
`(16, 17), provides a measure of the quaternary structure of Fabs.
`All knqwn Fab elbow bend angles are given in Table 5. The
`J539 Ffb elbow bend is 1360, which is indistinguishable from
`that of McPC6O3. This appears to be an extremum in the range
`of allowed values for Fab elbow bends, probably as a result of
`contacts between residues of the constant and variable domain
`pairs.
`The J539 and McPC603 Fabs are similar in their quaternary
`structures, as suggested by the similarities in their elbow bends.
`The principal difference lies in a small torsion about the local
`dyad of the variable region with respect to the constant region.
`Note that the resolution of the electron-density map is too low
`to provide any information about the conformations of the
`various hypervariable regions of J539; these should be revealed
`with the future high-resolution refinement of the structure.
`The model can provide a plausible explanation for the ob-
`servation that soaking of the haptens Gal2 and Gal4 into J539
`crystals did not yield significant intensity changes indicative
`of binding. Examination of the molecular packing shows that
`
`Table 5.
`
`Published Fab elbow bend angles
`
`Angle,
`Protein (ref.)
`degrees
`Newm (2)
`131*
`McPC603 (1)
`134
`J539 (this work)
`136
`Dob IgG (4)
`147
`Kol Fab (3)
`166
`Kol IgG (17)
`174
`* This elbow bend angle was computed from coordinates in AMSOM
`(9).
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979)
`
`the binding cavity in the variable region of J539 may in fact be
`blocked, at least in part, by the constant region of a neighboring,
`symmetry-related molecule.
`Finally, the limited number of degrees of freedom in the
`searches, coupled with the global constraints imposed by the
`electron-density map, confer a higher precision on our model
`than would be expected had the model been constructed from
`the map de novo. This added precision should allow us to pro-
`ceed directly to a high-resolution structure determination and
`to the refinement of J539 Fab without need of additional
`high-resolution heavy atom derivatives.
`The authors are grateful to Dr. Daniel Mercola for help in the search
`for heavy atom derivatives. We thank Drs. G. H. Cohen and E. W.
`Silverton for valuable discussion and advice and Dr. C. P. J. Glaude-
`mans for the haptens used in this study.
`Segal, D. M., Padlan, E. A., Cohen, G. H., Rudikoff, S., Potter,
`1.
`M. & Davies, D. R. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71,
`4298-4302.
`Poljak, R. J., Amzel, L. M., Avey, H. P., Chen, B. L., Phizackerly,
`R. P. & Saul, F. (1973) Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3305-
`3310.
`Matsushima, M., Marquart, M., Jones, T. A., Colman, P. M.,
`Bartels, K., Huber, R. & Palm, W. (1978) J. Mol. Biol. 121,
`441-459.
`Silverton, E. W., Navia, M. A. & Davies, D. R. (1977) Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 74,5140-5144.
`Jolley, M. E., Rudikoff, S., Potter, M. & Glaudemans, C. P. J.
`(1973) Biochemistry 12,3039-3044.
`Rudikoff, S., Potter, M., Segal, D. M., Padlan, E. A. & Davies, D.
`R. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69,3689-3692.
`Blow, D. M. & Crick, F. H. C. (1959) Acta Crystallogr. 12,
`794-802.
`Padlan, E. A., Segal, D. M., Spande, T. F., Davies, D. R., Rudikoff,
`S. & Potter, M. (1973) Nature (London) New Biol. 145, 165-
`167.
`Feldmann, R. J., ed. (1976) AMSOM-Atlas of Macromolecular
`Structure on Microfiche (Tracor Jitco, Inc., Rockville, MD).
`Kabat, E. A., Wu, T. T. & Bilofsky, H. (1976) in Variable Regions
`of Immunoglobulin Chains (Medical Computer Systems, Bolt,
`Beranek & Newman, Cambridge, MA).
`Diamond, R. (1966) Acta Crystallogy. 21, 253-266.
`Schmid, M. F., Herriott, J. R. & Lattman, E. A. (1974) J. Mol.
`Biol. 84, 97-101.
`Wishner, B. C., Ward, K. B., Lattman, E. A. & Love, W. E. (1975)
`J. Mol. Biol. 98, 179-194.
`Ward, K. B., Hendrickson, W. A. & Klippenstein, G. L. (1975)
`Nature (London) 257,818-821.
`Sarma, R. & Bott, R. (1977) J. Mol. Biol. 113,555-565.
`Davies, D. R., Padlan, E. A. & Segal, D. M. (1975) in Contem-
`porary Topics in Molecular Immunology, eds. Inman, F. P. &
`Mandy, W. J. (Plenum, New York), Vol. 4, pp. 127-155.
`Colman, P. M., Deisenhofer, J., Huber, R. & Palm, W. (1976) J.
`Mol. Biol. 100, 257-282.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`16.
`
`17.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1084 Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket