throbber
Reprinted from J, Mol, Biol, (1985) 186. 651-663
`
`Domain Association in Immunoglobulin Molecules
`The Packing of Variable Domains
`
`Cyrus Chothia, Jiri Novotny, Robert Bruccoleri
`and Martin Karplus
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 1 of 14
`
`

`
`J. Mijl, Biol. (1985) 186, 651-663
`
`Domain Association in Immunoglobulin Molecules
`The Packing of Variable Domains
`
`Cyrus Chothia
`
`MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
`Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH
`
`and
`
`Ingold Laboratories
`Christopher
`Department of Chemistry, University College London
`20 Gordon Street, London WCIH OAJ, England
`
`Jiri Novotny, Robert Bruccoleri
`
`Molecular dh Cellular Laboratory
`Massachusetts General Hospital
`
`and
`
`Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02114, U.S.A.
`
`and
`Martin Karplus
`
`Department of Chemistry
`Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, U.S.A.
`
`(Received 17 July 1984, and in revised form 19 July 1985)
`
`We have analyzed the structure of the interface between VL and VH domains in three
`immunoglobulin fragments: Fab KOL, Fab NEW and Fab MCPC 603. About 1800 A^ of
`protein surface is buried between the domains. Approximately three quarters of this
`interface
`is formed by
`the packing of the VL and
`\'H
`j8-sheets in the conserved
`"framework" and one quarter from contacts between the hypervariable regions. The
`jS-sheets that form the interface have edge strands that are strongly twisted (coiled) by
`^-bulges. As a result, the edge strands fold back over their own P-sheei at two diagonally
`opposite corners. When the VL and VH domains pack together, residues from these edge
`strands form the central part of the interface and give what we call a three-layer packing;
`i.e. there is a third layer composed of side-chains inserted between the two backbone side-
`chain layers that are usually in contact. This three-layer packing is different
`from
`previously described ^-sheet packings. The 12 residues that forin the central part of the
`three observed VL-VH packings are absolutely or very strongly conserved
`in all
`immunoglobulin sequences. This strongly suggests that the structure described here is a
`general model for the association of VL and VH domains and that the three-layer packing
`plays a central role in forming the antibody combining site.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Immunoglobulins are the best-studied examples
`of a large and ancient family of proteins, which also
`includes )5-microglobulins. Thy-1 antigens, major
`
`(i.e. class II) histo(cid:173)
`I) and minor
`(i.e. class
`compatibility antigens and cell surface receptors.
`Functionally, all these structures are involved in
`cell recognition processes (Jensenius & Williams,
`1982), either actively as vehicles endowed with
`
`(M)i>2-2836/85/230651-13 $03.00/0
`
`651
`
`© 1985 Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 2 of 14
`
`

`
`652
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`recognition specificity (antigen-combing antibodies)
`or passively as surface structures
`t h at are being
`recognized (histocompatibility antigens). Only
`the
`immunoglobulin
`tertiary structures are known
`to
`date (Schiflfer el al, 1983; E pp et al., 1974; Saul et
`al., 1978; Segal et al, 1974; Marquart et al, 1980;
`Deisenhofer,
`1981; Phizackerley
`et al,
`1979).
`However, the homology among primary structures
`of immunoglobulin, /^-microglobulin, Thy-1 antigen,
`some of the histocompatibility antigen domains,
`T-cell
`receptor P chain and
`the
`transepithelial
`"secretory component" has been
`interpreted as
`evidence for a common fold (Cunningham el al,
`1973; Orr et al, 1979; Feinstein, 1979; Cohen et al,
`1980, 1981a; Novotny & Auffray, 1984; Yangai et
`al, 1984; Hedrick et al, 1984; Mostov et al, 1984).
`
`A typical antibody molecule (IgGl) consists of
`two pairs of light chains [M, 25,000) and two pairs
`of heavy chains (M, 50,000), each of the chains
`being
`composed
`of
`domains made
`up
`of
`approximately
`100
`amino
`acid
`residues. The
`domains are autonomous folding units; it has been
`demonstrated
`experimentally
`(Hochman
`et
`al,
`1973; Goto & Hamaguchi, 1982) t h at a polypeptide
`chain segment corresponding to a single domain can
`be
`refolded
`independently of
`the
`rest of
`the
`polypeptide chain. All the immunoglobulin domains
`are formed by two jS-sheets packed face-to-face and
`covalently connected together by a disulfide bridge.
`The topology of the N-terminal, variable domains
`in both the light and heavy chains differs from t h at
`of the C-proximal constant domains. While the two
`variable domain sheets consist of five and
`four
`strands, respectively, the constant domain sheets
`are
`three- and four-stranded
`(Fig. 1). The
`four-
`stranded
`jS-sheets of
`the
`two domain
`types are
`homologous; the five- or four- stranded ^-sheet of
`the variable domains derives from the three-strand
`sheet of the constant domains by the addition, at
`one side, of a two-stranded ^-hairpin or a single
`jS-strand, respectively.
`In a complete immunoglobulin molecule, domains
`t h at correspond
`to different polypeptide
`chains
`associate to form domain dimers V L - V H, C L - C Hl
`and CH3-CH3. Edmundson et al. (1975) were the
`first
`to
`note
`the
`phenomenon
`of
`rotational
`allomerism between
`the variable and
`constant
`domain dimers, t h at
`is. whereas the C-C dimers
`interact via a close packing of their
`four-strand
`sheets, the V-V dimers pack "inside out", with the
`five-stranded
`sheets oriented
`face-to-face. The
`reversal of domain-domain
`interaction is reflected
`in the amino acid sequence homology between, and
`among,
`the
`constant
`and
`variable
`domains
`(Novotny & Franek, 1975; Beale & Feinstein, 1976;
`Novotny et al, 1977).
`same
`the
`in
`Different
`antibody molecules
`organism bind different antigenic structures. The
`variation
`in s])ecificity
`is produced by
`several
`mechanisms: mutations, deletions and insertions in
`the binding regions of the VL and VH domains; and
`the association of different light and heavy chains.
`.Aspects of the second mechanism are analyzed in
`
`this paper. In particular, the n a t u re of the interface
`between VL and VH domains
`is examined by
`comparing the F ab fragments of K O L, N EW and
`MCPC
`603 myeloma
`proteins whose X-ray
`structures are known. T he relative contributions to
`the buried surface between the domains from the
`conserved
`framework
`residues
`and
`the hyper(cid:173)
`variable
`regions
`are determined. Attention
`is
`focused on the unique packing of the interfaces and
`the reasons for this packing are examined.
`
`2. Materials and M e t h o ds
`
`(a) Fab fragment co-ordinala
`
`Cartesian co-ordinates for Fab fragments KOL. XEW
`and MCPC 603 were obtained from the Brookhaven Data
`Bank (Bernstein et al, 1977). Table 1 lists the domain
`classification, the nominal resolutions and the crystalio-
`graphic residuals (R factors) for the 3 Fab fragments. To
`facilitate comparisons of the 3 structures, their residue
`numbering was changed from that used in the original
`descriptions to that used by Kabat et al. (1983). Thus, in
`this paper residues that are structurally homologous have
`the same sequence number.
`To obtain consistent sets of atomic co-ordinates, the
`original co-ordinates were dissected into individual VI^
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`immunoglobulin
`typical
`in
`Figure 1. The /J-sheets
`domams. Wrtices represent the position of Ca atoms:
`those
`in
`/J sheets are
`linked bv ribbons; and
`those
`between strands by lines, (a) The VL domain of KOL: the
`^-sheet involved
`in \'L-VH contacts is closer to the
`viewer (unbroken line), (b) The same \h domain rotated
`by appro.ximately 90°. Note that the
`interface-forminj;
`^-sheet IS str,,ngiy twisted at diagonallv opposite corners
`(drawmg by A. M. Lesk).
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 3 of 14
`
`

`
`Packing of Immunoglobulin Variable Domains
`
`653
`
`Table 1
`Summary of X-ray crystallographic data
`
`L and H
`chain
`types
`
`Al, vIII
`
`XI, yll
`
`K, yl
`
`X-ray
`
`data
`
`Minimized
`
`Resolution
`(A)
`
`R factor
`(%)
`
`Energy
`(kJ)
`
`r.m.s. shift
`(A)
`
`Reference
`
`1-9
`
`20
`
`2-7
`
`26
`
`19
`
`24
`
`-3010
`
`-2592
`
`- 3 7 03
`
`—
`
`0-21
`
`0-26
`
`Marquart et al. (1980)
`
`Saul et al. (1978)
`
`Segal el al. (1974)
`
`Protein
`
`Fab KOL
`human
`Fab XEW
`human
`Fab MCPC 603
`mouse
`
`The energy given for Fab KOL is that of the unminimized crystallographic data.
`
`VH domain dimers. The structures were subjected to 100
`cycles of constrained energy minimization with
`the
`program CHARMM version 16 using the adopted-basis
`Newton-Raphson procedure (Brooks el al, 1983) with
`constraints of 41-8kJ (lOkcal) present on all the atoms
`(Bruccoleri & Karplus, unpublished results). Typically,
`the constrained minimization converged from original
`positive values of potential energy to values of about
`— 2TkJ/atom ( —0-50 kcal/atom) with an average root-
`mean-square co-ordinate different from the original X-ray
`structure of 0-3 A (see Table 1). The results indicate that
`the crystallographic structures were satisfactory and that
`acceptable values of potential energy can be achieved by
`small adjustments of the co-ordinates. Thus, both energy
`minized structures and the crystallographic co-ordinates
`were used in the present study: essentially
`identical
`results were obtained from the 2 types of co-ordinates
`sets.
`
`(b) Computation of solvent-accessible surfaces
`and contact areas
`Solvent-accessible surfaces (Lee & Richards, 1971) were
`computed with programs written by A. M. Lesk using the
`method of Shrake & Rupley (1973) and by T. Richmond
`using
`the methods of Lee & Richards
`(1971) and
`Richmond & Richards (1978). The latter program was
`obtained from Yale University. The water probe radius
`used was 1-4 A and the section interval along the Z axis
`was 0-05 A; the atom van der Waals' radii used were 2 A
`for all the (extended) tetrahedral carbon atoms, 1-85 A
`for all the planar (sp2 hybridized) carbons, 1-4 A and
`1-6 A for carbonyl and hydroxyl oxygens, respectively,
`1-5 A for a carbonyl OH group, 20 A for all
`the
`(extended) tetrahedral nitrogen atoms, 1-5 A, 1-7 A and
`1-8 A for «p2-hybridized nitrogen atoms carrying no
`hydrogen, 1 and 2 hydrogen atoms, respectively, 20 A for
`a sulfhydryl group and 1-85 A for a divalent sulfur atom
`with no hydrogens.
`
`(c) pStrands and ji-sheets
`
`Protein structures were analyzed using the CHARMM
`program (Brooks et al. 1983) in the so-called explicit
`hydrogen atom representation: aliphatic hydrogens were
`combined together with their heavy atoms into"extended
`atoms" whereas hydrogens bound to polar atoms and
`possibly
`involved
`in hydrogen bonds were explicitly
`present. The ^-strands and ^-sheets were defined by
`their inter-strand backbone (C = 0 . . . H-N) hydrogen-
`
`bonding pattern. A hydrogen bond list was generated in
`CHARMM for all the polypeptide chain segments under
`consideration and amino acids with hydrogen bonds of
`nearly optimal geometry (energy of —4T8kJ/bond or
`less) were taken to be parts of the ;8-sheets (cf Fig. 3 of
`Novotny et al, 1983). This method of defining ^-strand
`boundaries gives results essentially identical to those
`obtained by visual inspection of crystallographic models,
`although it tends to be somewhat more restrictive (the 2
`methods sometimes differ
`in inclusion of the N- or
`C-terminal ^-strand residues). Ambiguities arise in cases
`of edge /3-strands that start and end with
`irregular
`conformations ()S-bulges); such cases are discussed in
`more detail below.
`
`(d) ^-Strand conformation
`
`In a typical extended polypeptide chain segment, the
`dihedral angle between the 2 consecutive side-chains is
`not 180° as in the ideal ^-sheet (Pauling et al, 1951) but
`closer
`to —160°; that
`is, the ^-strands are
`twisted
`(Chothia,
`1973).
`The
`out-of-planarity
`angle
`(180°-160°) = 20' can be obtained explicitly from the
`values of the principal backbone torsion angles tp, \ii and
`0) (see. e.g. Chou el al, 1982). We define the local
`backbone twist for 2 consecutive residues as:
`
`9=
`
`-
`
`(180-
`
`where T is the torsion angle C/J-Ca-C"a-C'jS and |T| denotes
`its magnitude. When glycine residues that lack C;8 atoms
`are encountered, the torsion angle 9 is measured with
`respect to the C'jS atom following the glycine. Thus,
`glycine residues contribute to the local backbone twist
`indirectly, by being included in the virtual bond Ca-Ca
`that spans from the residue preceding the glycine to that
`which follows it.
`Backbone twist profiles (plots of 9 as a function of the
`amino acid residue) serve to characterize polypeptide
`chain conformations. Certain conformational character(cid:173)
`istics of polypeptides are more clearly seen using 8 values
`instead of the cp^ values for individual residues. In our
`plots, the value of the torsion angle Ca-C;8-C'a-C'^ is
`assigned to the second (C) residue. The angle 9 is related
`to "the amount of twist per 2 residues", defined as 8 by
`Chou et al. (1982); in fact, 9 = \5. It thus follows that 9
`can be obtained from the helical parameters n (number of
`residues per
`turn), h (the rise per residue) and T
`(T = 360°/») in a corresponding way to that descrilied for
`,5bvChou Wr//. (1982).
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 4 of 14
`
`

`
`654
`
`C. Chothia. J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`3. Results
`(a) Domain-domain cotilarl .Kurfncen
`We identified the residues that form the interface
`between \'L and VH by calculation of the solvent-
`accessible surface of the domains, first in isolation
`and second when associated. Any residue that lost
`surface on the association of VL and VH was taken
`as part of the interface between them. We also
`determined which residues form van der Waals'
`contacts across the interface (distance cutoff 41 A).
`The hsts of residues obtained by the two methods
`were very similar. Thus, exce])t for a few marginal
`cases, the residues that
`lose surface in domain-
`domain contacts also have van der Waals' inter(cid:173)
`actions between the domains, indicating that the
`\'L-VH interface is tightly packed.
`The total surface areas of the separated VL and
`VH domains and that buried on the association is
`shown in Table 2. The values for the buried surface
`area (between 1700 and 1900 A^) and the fraction of
`the buried surface that is composed of polar atoms
`are similar to those found in other cases (Chothia &
`Janin, 1975). For the bovine pancreatic
`trypsin
`inhibitor and trypsin it is known that the structure
`of
`the
`isolated
`proteins
`does
`not
`change
`significantly on association. In most cases, as for
`the VL and VH domains considered here, there are
`no
`data
`concerning
`the
`structure
`of
`the
`unassociated domains.
`Of the total area buried between the VL-VH
`dimers about one quarter comes from residues in
`the hypervariable regions and about three quarters
`from
`residues
`in ^-sheets. Figure 2 shows
`the
`residues that form the interfaces and the areas that
`are buried for the three VH-VL packings. Two
`important features are evident in this Figure. First,
`homologous residues form the interface in the three
`structures. Second,
`the pattern formed by
`the
`contact residues is most unusual. The contacts of
`residues on the edge strands of the /8-sheets are
`more extensive than those of residues on the innei-
`strands. This is the opposite of the behavior found
`in previously described jS-sheet jiackings, where it
`is the central strands that have the largest contact.
`
`For example, for packing of j9-sheets in the same
`domain, the region of maximal contact generally
`runs diagonally across the sheets at 45° with respect
`to the )?-strands (Cohen et al, 19816; Chothia &
`Janin, 1981). The point is clearly illustrated in the
`Ca backbone plot in Figure 2(c); here, for each of
`the Ca atoms a circle is displayed, the area of which
`is proportional to the total contact area made by
`the residue with the other sheet. As we describe
`below, the unusual packing is a direct consequence
`of the distortions present in this type of ^-sheet.
`
`(b) Conformation of interface P-sheets
`the
`The deviation of
`the conformations of
`jS-sheets that form the interface between VL and
`VH from the idealized flat structure (i.e. twisting,
`coiling and bending) can be characterized by the
`variations in the twist angle 9 (see Materials and
`Methods). On such twist profiles, regular twisted
`P-sheets correspond
`to horizontal
`lines with an
`average 9 = -1-20°, right-handed a helices to lines of
`9 = — 110° and tight reverse turns as triplets of
`points of approximately the same magnitude and
`alternating sign. The insertion of an additional
`residue in an edge strand of a ^-sheet, so that two
`edge residues face one another on an inner strand,
`forms what has been called a jS-bulge (Richardson et
`al, 1978). Such insertions can have a variety of
`conformational effects depending upon the exact
`(pi// values of the inserted residue and those of its
`neighbors. Usually a sharp bend or local coiling is
`produced in the edge strand; this gives rise to a
`single- oi' double-point peak or trough in the 9
`values.
`In Figure 3 we show the 9 values for the VL-VH
`interface segments (jS-strands with
`the adjacent
`hypervariable loops) in KOL, NEW and MCPC 603.
`Two
`important
`features of
`these
`jS-sheets are
`evident
`from
`the Figure. First, most of
`the
`individual values of 9, and the patterns formed by
`the variations in 9 angles, are very similar in the
`different sheets, particularly in the inner )?-strands
`(;81, i93, P5 and )38 of Fig. 3) and in the i?-bulges; the
`edge jS-strands (;S2, )S4, ^36 and jS9 of Fig. 3) have
`
`Table 2
`Accessible surfaces and those lost on VL-VH association
`
`(A')
`
`Domain pair
`
`KOL VL domain
`KOL VH domain
`VL-VH in KOL
`XKW VL domain
`XP:\V VH domain
`\'L VH in XEW
`.MCPC 603 VL domain
`M(;PC 603 VH domain
`Vl^VH in MCPC 603
`\'L-VH averaj^e
`
`Isolated surface
`
`Contact
`
`surface
`
`Hydrophobic
`
`Polar
`
`Total
`
`Hydrophobic
`
`Polar
`
`Total
`
`1)21
`1216
`2337
`1233
`1186
`2419
`1082
`1156
`2238
`2331
`
`658
`700
`1358
`744
`801
`1545
`689
`760
`1449
`1714
`
`1779
`1926
`3705
`1977
`1985
`3962
`1771
`1916
`3687
`3785
`
`580
`615
`1195
`529
`506
`1035
`676
`619
`1295
`1195
`
`311
`250
`.561
`387
`386
`773
`299
`324
`623
`652
`
`891
`865
`1756
`916
`892
`1808
`975
`943
`1918
`1827
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 5 of 14
`
`

`
`Packing of Immunoglobulin
`
`Variable Domains
`
`655
`
`I
`I S23
`95L76::::92
`I P36
`I
`I Y9I
`I WI06
`96R143
`9IY39
`I LS4
`I D64
`
`31
`
`I TI5
`32H24
`I F55
`
`9 7:
`
`; 90
`
`33
`
`I F96
`98F9S
`I FIIO
`
`I N24
`I AO
`8 9 Q 6 : : ; : 3 4 K 30
`I Q9
`I A9
`
`I P50
`l o om
`I F62
`I D27
`IOID52
`I DI8
`
`I
`96
`I
`I
`I DO
`95N3I_.,.33
`I N20
`I
`
`I 0 2.
`
`-94
`
`34
`
`I W75
`I03W7I
`I W73
`
`I YI2
`I AO
`9 3 A o : : : : 3 5 To
`I AO
`I E9
`
`^ 9 9-
`T7
`GI4
`A32
`
`lOO
`
`lOI
`
`88
`
`35
`
`I Y41
`1 Y48
`87Y5i::::36Y4i
`I Y44
`I Y43
`
`i L45
`46L57
`I L50
`
`^I04"
`I05 QI4
`025
`AI7
`
`I06
`
`92
`
`36
`
`I V6
`I F32
`9IY29::::37V6
`V5
`Y33
`
`I was
`47W88
`wes
`
`::-V-V.9o
`I07
`
`1
`
`8 9 '"
`
`I 08
`
`3 8 : :: ::::.^
`46
`
`Q48
`9Q20
`•3
`Q32
`
`V. Lies
`45 LI04
`I L88
`I G30
`44GI3
`•' R96
`
`1 0 2 : : : ; : :: 86
`
`3 7:
`
`-45.
`
`103
`
`8 5:
`
`I Q29
`. 38 038
`I Q35
`
`104
`
`84
`
`39"
`
`"42
`
`X P69
`44P67
`I P70
`
`I A52
`43A63
`P6I
`
`'
`
`VL
`
`(a)
`
`: : : : : ; : 88
`I09:
`
`40
`
`4
`43
`
`VH
`
`(b)
`
`( c)
`Figure 2. fi-Sheet residues that form the VL-VH interface in the Tabs KOL. NEW and MCPC 603^ Residue numbers
`are those of Kabat ./ al
`(1983). (a) VL interface-forming ^-sheet; (b) VH interface-formmg ^-sheet^ Broken Imes
`indicate hydrogen bonds. At each position where a residue forms part of the interface, we g.ve the residue -dentity in
`KOL. NEW and MCPC 603, and the accessible surface of the residue that i^^uned in the VL-\ H mterface^ Xote^^^^^^
`^-bulges in the edge strands at positions 43. 44 and 100, 101 in VL and 44. 45 and 105. 106 in the \ H. (c) The J-sheet
`from KOL VH domain. Residues making contacts to the VL domain across the domain-domain •"*« f^;^ ^'^-^'f^^
`The main-chain atoms are displayed. The circles associated with each Ca atom have an area P ^ P "^ " " t he e ^S
`accessible surface area lost when the VL-X'H dimer forms. Note the large areas associated with residues in the edge
`strands of the /S-sheet.
`
`25
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 6 of 14
`
`

`
`656
`
`('. Chothia, J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`150
`
`-
`
`100
`
`<u a o
`o
`n
`
`- 50
`
`-
`
`- 1 00
`
`- 1 50
`
`-
`
`150 -
`
`100
`
`-
`
`50 -
`
`0)
`
`a
`o
`M o
`n -50
`
`-100 -
`
`-150 -
`
`Sequence number
`
`(a)
`
`85
`
`90
`
`95
`
`100
`
`105
`
`Sequence number
`
`(b)
`Figure 3. The backbone twist (9) profiles of VL-VH interface-forming segments. The segments shown include the
`hypervariable loops (LI, L2. L3, HI, H2 and H3) and the )?-strands. The j8-strands are indicated by bars at the bottom
`of the plots and labeled ^1 through ^9 according to Novotny et al. (1983). /S-Bulges are denoted by open boxes. Seciuence
`numbers correspond to the Kabat et al. (1983) numbering system and are the same as in Fig. 2. (a) and (b) The 2
`interface-forminfi sefiuients of the \'L domain; (c) and (d) the 2 interface-forming segments of the VH domain.
`(O) KOL; (D) NEW; (A) M('I><' 603.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 7 of 14
`
`

`
`Packing of Immunoglobulin Variable Domains
`
`657
`
`Sequence number
`(c)
`
`150 -
`
`100 -
`
`d
`o
`
`a

`
`-50 -
`
`-100
`
`-150
`
`150 -
`
`100 -
`
`50 -
`
`01
`a
`o ,a
`a
`a
`m
`
`-50 -
`
`-100 -
`
`-150 -
`
`120
`
`j9-bulge
`of
`differences. Conservation
`greater
`conformations is especially striking and implies that
`they are important architecturally, as previously
`suggested
`by
`Richardson
`(1981).
`The
`correspondence in the ^-sheets is made even more
`
`the
`in behavior of
`the difference
`evident by
`hvfiervariable
`loops. The overall similarity of
`/?-sbeet geometries is confirmed by a least-squares
`fit of their atomic co-ordinates. Fits of the main-
`chain atoms of the three VL j8-sheets to each other
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 8 of 14
`
`

`
`658
`
`C. Chothia, J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`Pro
`lOO
`
`I04
`
`84 39
`
`VL
`Figure 4. The key residues in the edge strands involved in VL-VH packings (Fab KOL). Note how in (a) Pro44,
`Tyr96 and Phe98 in VL and in (b) Leu45, ProlOO and Trpl03 in VH fold over the central strands of their ^-sheets and
`so in (c) form the core of the VL-VH packing (see also the position of these residues in Fig. 5).
`
`VH
`
`VL-VH
`
`(30 residues), and of the three VH )3-sheets to each
`other
`(32
`residues)
`give
`root-mean-square
`differences in atomic positions of between 0-73 and
`1-23 A (see Table 3). If a few peripheral residues are
`removed from
`the fits the r.m.s.f differences are
`reduced to 0-55 to 0-87 A. Table 3 also reports the
`results of least-squares fits of the VL P-sheeis
`to the
`VH ^-sheets. The r.m.s. differences are only a little
`greater than for the fits of the VL or VH /S-sheets to
`each other, 0-70 to 1-11 A. Thus, the six regions of
`P-sheet
`t h at form
`the V L - VH
`interface in K O L,
`N EW and MCPC 603 have very similar structures.
`In fact, the least-squares superposition of the two
`sheets can be achieved as a 2-fold
`symmetry
`operation,
`i.e.
`rotation around an axis passing
`through the centroid of the interface.
`The second feature of the |8-sheets illustrated in
`Figure 3 is the different amounts of twist found in
`the edge and inner strands. The two central strands
`in both VL and VH have 3 values in the range t h at
`indicate a degree of
`twist commonly
`found
`in
`P-sheets. The average 9 value tends to be the same
`for both the inner and the edge strands, b ut
`the
`twist of the edge strands is dominated by j8-bulges
`(Figs 2 and 3) with characteristic 9 values ± 7 0. I ts
`effect is to fold the ends of the edge strands over
`central strands. This occurs at
`two diagonally
`opposite corners of
`the P-sheets.
`Side-chains of
`residues 44 (Pro), 96 (Tyr, Arg, Leu) and 98 (Pro) in
`VL and 45 (Leu), 100 (Pro, He, Phe) and 103 (Trp)
`cover residues in the inner strands (Fig. 4(a) and
`(b)). The other parts of the edge strand residues,
`45-46 and 101-104 in VL, 46-48 and 106-109 in
`VH,
`lie next
`to the
`inner strand
`in the normal
`manner.
`
`t Abbreviation used: r.m.s., root-mean-square.
`
`(c) Packing of the P-sheets at the VL-VH
`
`inteiface
`
`As noted above, the strong twists t h at occur in
`the edge strands of VL and VH means t h at residues
`at two diagonally opposite corners fold over the
`^-sheets: 44, 96 and 98 in VL (Fig. 4(a)), and 45.
`100 and 103 in VH (Fig. 4(b)). Figure 4(c) shows
`t h at when the VL and VH domains pack together
`
`Table 3
`The fit of P-sheets forming VL- VH
`A. Fit.'! of individual P-sheets
`
`V Lt
`
`interfaces
`
`VHJ
`
`KOL NEW
`
`MCPC
`
`KOL
`
`NEW
`
`MCPC
`
`0-76
`—
`— —
`
`0-55
`0-82
`—
`
`VLt KOL
`NEW
`MCPC
`V H | K OL
`XEW
`MCPC
`
`0-88
`0-96
`0-70
`—
`
`111
`105
`100
`0-87
`—
`
`0-94
`0-97
`0-84
`0-65
`0-87
`—
`
`B. FiU of both (i-sheel regions of the VI^VH interfaces^
`
`KOL NEW MCPC
`
`0-87
`
`0-70
`0-87
`
`KOL
`NEW
`MCPC
`
`The Table i;ive.s r.m.s. differences in position of the main chain
`atoms
`following
`least-squares
`fits of
`their co-ordinates.
`Differences are given in A.
`t VL residues used to determine fits and r.m.s. differences
`33-39, 43-47. 84-90 and 98-104.
`I VH residues used to determine fits and r.m.s. differences
`33-40, 44-48, 88-94 and 102-109.
`§ Residues used in fits 33-39, 43-47, 84-90 and 98-104 of VL
`and 34-40, 44^8. 88-94 and 103-109 of VH.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 9 of 14
`
`

`
`Packing of Immunoglobulin
`
`Variable Domains
`
`659
`
`VL
`
`90
`i\ Tyr
`
`/..
`
`(a)
`
`I03
`f 102 ^ Trp
`\ Tyr
`/\
`
`y-Jz^^i.^^
`
`-«'' -"
`
`\'ri7% K
`i ' V Q V\ ^/ „
`38 r'
`\f
`\ Arg ; ^ - -^
`V ^ v_
`
`V.
`
`'
`
`VH
`
`(b)
`
`47
`
`VL
`
`35
`Trp
`
`46
`Leu
`
`,Asr
`
`89
`Ala
`
`/
`
`1 U Pro
`X
`W-v
`M A la A V - - ^ T y r y «'
`n','^36 <_V_Jrp
`
`VH
`
`97
`Val
`
`) o
`
`VH
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`Figure 5. Residue packing at the KOL VL-VH interface.. This Figure shows superimposed serial sections cut through
`a space-filling model of the interface. VH residues are shown by broken lines and VL residues by continuous lines. The
`p.seudo 2-fold axis that relates VL to VH is perpendicular to the page. Each part of the Figure shows 4 sections.
`separated by 1 A. superimposed, (a) Sections 0 to 3 A; (b) sections 4 to 7 A; (c) sections 8 to 11 A; and (d) Sections 12 to
`ISA.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 10 of 14
`
`

`
`660
`
`('. Chothia. J. Novotny, R. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus
`
`Table 4
`VI^VH
`Re.sid '»e.s b
`urietl
`in
`
`interfaces
`
`Residue at this
`in
`
`position
`
`surface
`Accessible
`Df residue (A )
`area <
`
`Domain
`
`Residue
`No.
`
`KOL
`
`NEW
`
`MCPC
`
`KOL
`
`XEV\'
`
`MCPC
`
`No. of sequences known that
`include this positiont
`
`Principal residues found
`at this nositiont
`(identity and number of cases)
`
`\L
`
`VH
`
`34
`36
`38
`44
`46
`87
`89
`91
`96
`98
`35
`37
`39
`45
`47
`91
`93
`95
`100
`103
`
`Asn
`Tyr
`(iln
`Pro
`Leu
`Tvr
`Ala
`Trp
`Tyr
`Phe
`Tvr
`Val
`Gin
`Leu
`Trp
`Phe
`Ala
`.Asj)
`Pro
`Trp
`
`L\'s
`Tvr
`Gin
`Pro
`Leu
`Tyr
`Gin
`Tyr
`Arg
`Phe
`Thr
`Val
`Gin
`Leu
`Trp
`Tyr
`Ala
`Asn
`He
`Trp
`
`Ala
`Tyr
`Gin
`Pro
`Leu
`Tyr
`Gin
`Asp
`Leu
`Phe
`Gin
`Val
`Gin
`Leu
`Trp
`Tvr
`Ala
`Asn
`Phe
`Trp
`
`2
`1)
`2
`8
`17
`9
`0
`3
`6
`10
`0
`0
`8
`10
`11
`1)
`0
`0
`0
`27
`
`39
`0
`7
`5
`35
`1
`1
`12
`5
`9
`2
`3
`20
`6
`6
`8
`0
`0
`32
`28
`
`0
`1
`17
`5
`8
`U
`0
`0
`3
`2
`0
`1
`21
`3
`4
`11
`1
`5
`0
`26
`
`t Data taken from Kabat et al. (1983).
`
`362
`318
`302
`238
`235
`227
`217
`211
`199
`206
`217
`200
`183
`163
`157
`1.59
`161
`131
`113
`125
`
`Alall7, Asn92, His51. Ser37
`Tvr243. Phe40. Val28
`G'ln279
`Prol90. Phe29. \ a l l4
`Leul.57, Gly32. Prol9. Vall3
`Tyr 160, Phe65
`Gin 128, Ala35
`Trp.59, TyrSl, Ser27
`Trp46, Tvr31. 126. R20
`Phe203
`Gln53. Asn42, Ser34. Lvs22
`Vall78. Ilel9
`Gin 176
`Leu160
`TrplSl
`Tvr 128, PheSO
`Ala 146
`Asp53, (;iyl8
`Phe76. MetU. Leu6
`Trp 118
`
`these six residues form the center of the interface.
`They are in contact with each other in pairs and
`make a herringbone pattern.
`the VI^-VH
`Details of how residues pack at
`interface can be seen in sections cut through space(cid:173)
`filling models. Figure 5 shows sections of the KOL
`VL-VH interface. The central role played by the
`three pairs of edge residues, Tyr96 and Trp 103, and
`Leu45 and Pro44 are seen in parts (b), (c) and (d) of
`the Figure. The inner strands of the j8-sheets, 32-39
`and 84-92 in VL and 33-40 and 88-95 in VH, only
`make
`interdomain contacts at one end of
`the
`interface where the side-chains of Gln38 and Gln39
`hydrogen bond
`to each other
`(Fig. 5(a)). The
`structures of the VL-VH interfaces in NEW and
`MCPC 603 are very similar
`to
`that of KOL
`illustrated here. This is demonstrated by graphical
`inspection of their packing and by the fits of the co(cid:173)
`ordinates of the main-chain atoms forming the VL-
`VH interfaces described above (Table 3).
`The packing of the ^-sheets at the three \'L-\'H
`interfaces can be described in terms of a three-layer
`structure: an inner layer consisting of large side-
`chains from strongly
`twisted ends of the edge
`strands; and two outer layers formed by the main
`and side-chains of the inner )?-strands and
`the
`middle part of the edge strands (Figs 4 and 5).
`
`(d) Three-layer pncking n.s a general model for
`VL-VH
`ns.'^ocialinns
`Ten years ago Poljak et al (1975) examined their
`Fab XEW structure and noted that the residues
`
`that form the \T.,-VH interface were conserved in
`the other immunoglobulin sequences then known.
`They predicted that
`the mode of association of
`other VL-VH dimers would be the same as that
`found
`in Fab NEW. The structures and many
`sequences determined since then, and
`the work
`reported here, confirm their prediction.
`The three structures studied here include a wide
`range of immunoglobulins: human X and y to mouse
`K and y (Table 1). In KOL, NEW and MCPC 603
`residues at about ten positions in VL and in VH are
`buried in the interface between the domains. The
`amino acid sequences of many other
`immuno(cid:173)
`globulins have been determined and a tabulation
`published by Kabat et al. (1983). We examined the
`tables of VL and VH sequences
`to find what
`residues occur at positions homologous to the 20
`buried in the \'L-VH interfaces studied here. The
`results of this survey are given in Table 4 and
`Figure 6.
`At 12 of the 20 positions residue identity is
`absolutely, or very strongly, conserved: in VL.
`residues 36. 38, 44." 87 and 98; in VH, residues 37,
`39, 45, 47, 91, 93 and 103. As shown in Figure 6,
`these residues form the whole of the central and
`lower regions of the interface. The eight positions
`that have some variation in residue identity are all
`in the upper part of the interfaces where they are
`adjacent
`to and partially buried by the hyper(cid:173)
`variable regions. The three structures studied have
`a range of residues at these positions that is fairly
`representative of those found
`in other sequences
`(Table 4). Inspection of the three structures shows
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1063 Page 11 of 14
`
`

`
`Packing of Immunoglobulin
`
`Variable Domains
`
`661
`
`96 0-23 W
`0-16 Y
`
`91 0-28 W
`0-25 Y
`
`VL
`
`98 0-99 F
`
`89 0-60 Q
`0-16 A
`
`34 0-32 A
`0-25 N
`
`X = + I8 A
`
`99
`
`I -00 G
`
`101
`I
`
`l-OOG
`
`87 0'99F/Y
`I
`
`36 0-90 Y/F
`
`I
`46 0-67 L
`0-14G
`
`38 0-92 Q
`I
`
`44 0-80 P
`I 0-12 F
`
`x= OA
`
`100 0-73 F
`0-10 L
`
`95 0 - 4 0D
`0 - I 4G
`
`VH
`
`103 0-94 W
`
`93 0-91 A
`
`35 0-23E
`0 - I 9N
`
`104 0-98 G
`
`91 0-99 Y/F
`
`37 0-89 V
`0-10 I
`
`47 0-93 W
`
`106 0-98 G
`I
`
`45 0-98 L
`
`39 0-96 Q
`I
`Figure 6. The conservation of residues that form VL-
`VH interfaces. On a plan of the VL and \'H )S-sheets we
`show the principal residues found at sites buried in the
`interface and at sites involved in the formation of the
`;8-bulges. At each site we note the proportion of known
`sequences that contain the given residue, for example,
`0-99 of known VL sequences have Phe at position 98 (see
`Table 4). The one-letter code for amino acids is used.
`
`I 04
`LEU
`
`/
`
`f R/
`
`' ; P HE If:.
`
`'^C^^'--
`" ^"^v
`
`VAL
`
`V^^.ARG/'l
`
`;if = OA
`
`residues are accommodated by
`that the different
`small conformational changes in the ends of
`the
`)?-strands and
`somewhat
`larger changes
`in
`the
`hypervariable
`regions. The G l y - X - G ly
`sequence
`that produces the )S-bulge at residues 99-101 in VL
`and 104-106 in VH is absolutely conserved in VL
`and VH sequences (Fig. 6). Thus
`the pattern of
`conserved
`residues
`in VL
`and VH
`sequences
`suggests t h at the three-layer packing found for the
`structures studied here is a general model for V L-
`VH associations.
`
`(e) Three-layer

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket