throbber
Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 86, pp. 607-611, January 1989
`Immunology
`
`Three-dimensional structure of Fab R19.9, a monoclonal murine
`antibody specific for the p-azobenzenearsonate group
`M.-B. LASCOMBE*, P. M. ALZARI*, G. BOULOT*, P. SALUDJIAN*, P. TOUGARD*, C. BEREKt, S. HABAt,
`E. M. ROSENt, A. NISONOFFt, AND R. J. POLJAK*§
`*DNpartement d'Immunologie, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France; tInstitute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne 41, Federal Republic of Germany;
`and tRosenstiel Research Center, Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254
`Contributed by A. Nisonoff, August 8, 1988
`
`ABSTRACT
`The crystal structure of Fab R19.9, derived
`from an anti-p-azobenzenearsonate monoclonal antibody, has
`been determined and refined to 2.8-A resolution by x-ray
`crystallographic techniques. Monoclonal antibody R19.9
`(IgG2bK) shares some idiotopes with a major idiotype (CRIA)
`associated with A/J anti-p-azobenzenearsonate antibodies.
`The amino acid sequences of the variable (V) parts of the heavy
`(VH) and light (VL) polypeptide chains of monoclonal antibody
`R19.9 were determined through nucleotide sequencing of their
`mRNAs. The VL region is very similar to that of CRIA-positive
`anti-p-azobenzenearsonate antibodies as is VH, except for its
`third complementarity-determining region, which is three
`amino acids longer; it makes a loop, unique to R19.9, that
`protrudes into the solvent. A large number of tyrosine residues
`in the complementarity-determining region of VH and VL, with
`their side chains pointing towards the solvent, may have an
`important function in antigen binding.
`
`Murine antibodies to model antigens have provided valuable
`experimental systems to study the molecular bases of the
`specificity, diversity, and genetic control of immune re-
`sponses. The hapten, p-azobenzenearsonate (Ar), has been
`used in several laboratories as a suitable probe for such studies
`(1-5), which have been facilitated by the presence of an
`intrastrain cross-reactive idiotype, designated CRIA, among
`the anti-Ar antibodies ofA/J mice or ofclosely related strains.
`The expression of CRIA is linked to genetic loci encoding
`heavy (H) chains (6) and light (L) chains (7). On the average,
`about half of the anti-Ar antibodies induced by keyhole limpet
`hemocyanin-Ar in A/J mice share this idiotype. The variable
`(V) regions, VH and VL, of CRIA antibodies appear to be
`encoded by single germ-line genes (8, 9), and the diversity (D)
`region is encoded by a variant of the DFL16.1 gene (10). CRIA
`molecules also utilize the VK10, K chain joining (J) 1, and,
`almost invariably, JH2 gene segments (4, 5, 11). Idiotype-
`expressing antibodies from hyperimmunized mice display
`somatic variants ofamino acid sequences in each ofthese gene
`segments (4, 5, 12), whereas the antibodies from an early
`primary response reflect few if any mutations (5). The VH
`region appears to be somewhat more susceptible to somatic
`variation than VL (4). A disproportionate number of mutations
`in VH and VL occurs in their complementarity-determining
`regions (CDR); this probably reflects selection by antigen of
`variants with higher affinity (5).
`Among the serum anti-Ar antibodies of immunized A/J
`mice are molecules that carry some but not all ofthe idiotopes
`associated with CRIA (13, 14). Such antibodies are bound by
`anti-CRIA antibodies, but they are unable to completely
`displace labeled CRI+ antibodies from such anti-idiotype
`antibodies. Antibodies of this type were designated "minor
`idiotypes" (13, 14). The subject of the present investigation,
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement"
`in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`monoclonal antibody (mAb) R19.9 (IgG2bK), has these sero-
`logical properties and is thus a member of a minor idiotypic
`anti-Ar family. The L chains of R19.9, when combined with
`H chains of a CRI' mAb, yielded a CRI+ product (14).
`However, the converse recombinant (Hl9.9LcRI) was CRIA
`by the criterion of inhibition in the standard assay for CRIA.
`Amino acid sequences (this paper) indicate that the VK10, JK1,
`VH, and JH2 sequences of R19.9 are closely related to the
`putative germ-line sequences controlling CRIA but that the
`DH sequence (in CDR3 of VH) differs markedly; it is 3
`residues longer than the characteristic DH sequence (11 vs. 8
`residues). There are also three amino acid substitutions in
`CDR2 of VH that may contribute to the idiotypic variance of
`R19.9.
`The x-ray crystallographic study of Fab R19.9 presented
`here permits a correlation between amino acid sequences,
`idiotypic markers, and the three-dimensional structure of the
`A/J anti-Ar antibodies. Tentative conclusions can also be
`drawn about the conformation of the antigen-combining site
`of anti-Ar molecules.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`The monoclonal, A/J anti-Ar antibody R19.9 (IgG2bK) was
`prepared as described (15, 16). After papain digestion (17),
`the Fab fragment of R19.9 was extensively purified by three
`successive column chromatography steps with Sephadex
`G-100 (Pharmacia), DEAE-cellulose (0.76 milliequivalent per
`g; Serva, Heidelberg) equilibrated in 0.04 M potassium
`phosphate buffer, and PBE 94 (Pharmacia) for chromatofo-
`cusing. In this last step, the Fab was eluted with Polybuffer
`96 (Pharmacia) as a major peak at pH 7.5-7.6. The purified
`Fab of R19.9 was crystallized at room temperature by vapor
`diffusion in hanging drops (18) or in capillaries against 20%
`(wt/vol) PEG 8000 (Sigma)/0.2 M sodium chloride/3 mM
`sodium azide/0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.3 (19). The
`crystals grow to a size of up to 0.3 mm x 0.4 mm x 1.5 mm.
`They are monoclinic, space group P21, with unit cell di-
`mensions a = 43.3 A, b = 80.8 A, c = 75.1 A, , = 960. There
`is one Fab in the asymmetric unit.
`X-ray intensity data were measured on a diffractometer
`with CuKa radiation. Since the crystals of Fab R19.9 are
`polymorphic (19), they were carefully selected to conform to
`the unit cell dimensions given above. Crystals were replaced
`with the intensities of reference reflections decreased below
`70% of their starting values. Integrated intensities were
`obtained by profile fitting (20) and were further corrected for
`Lorentz-polarization factors, absorption (21), and radiation
`decay. For the native crystals, a complete data set to 2.8-A
`
`Abbreviations: Ar, p-azobenzenearsonate; CRIA, major cross-
`reactive idiotype associated with anti-Ar antibodies of the A strain of
`mouse; H, heavy; L, light; V, variable; D, diversity; J, joining; C,
`constant; mAb, monoclonal antibody; CDR, complementarity-de-
`termining region.
`§To whom reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`607
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1060 Page 1 of 5
`
`

`
`_ASA~~ --
`
`20
`S V K H
`
`30
`S C K A S G Y T F T S
`
`-
`
`-
`
`D- - -- -- -- --_ *_**
`
`__^_^
`
`Y G
`
`N
`
`I
`
`v
`
`0.349
`0.500
`0.465
`0.500
`0.469
`0.500
`IFobsi = 0.2%; number of
`
`hk I
`
`608
`
`Immunology: Lascombe et a!.
`
`Table 1.
`
`Crystallographic refinement of Fab R19.9
`Actual rms
`deviation, A
`
`0.011
`0.091
`0.085
`0.006
`
`Target or
`
`0.020
`0.060
`0.060
`0.020
`
`Parameter
`Deviation from ideal distances
`Bond distances
`Angle distances
`Planar 1-4 distances
`Deviation from planarity
`Deviation from permitted constant
`distances
`Single torsion contacts
`Multiple torsion contacts
`Possible hydrogen bond
`IIFobsI - IFca-iII/>ZJ
`R factor = »,1
`h k I
`structure factors F > 2o = 12,145.
`resolution was obtained from 26,284 measurements that were
`merged to yield the intensities of 13,138 independent reflec-
`tions (Rsym = 0.074). Three heavy atom derivatives were
`obtained by using phenylmercury(II) acetate, p-hydroxy-
`methylbenzenesulfonate, and OsCl6. Their intensities were
`measured to 3.5-A [phenylmercury(II) acetate and p-
`hydroxymethylbenzenesulfonate] and 6-A (OsCl6) resolu-
`tion. After refinement of heavy atom occupancies, scale
`factors, and thermal (isotropic) and positional parameters, an
`electron density map was calculated to 3.5-A resolution
`(average figure of merit, m = 0.52). The interpretation of this
`map was facilitated by a six-dimensional real space search by
`using the model ofFab New (22) as a search object. A rotation
`function calculation (23) gave a clear indication of the
`orientation of the Fab in the unit cell, in agreement with that
`found by the model search of the electron density map. The
`positions of the VH, VL, CHi, and CL domains were refined
`at 6-A resolution by a constrained-restrained least-squares
`procedure [CORELS (24)]. At this stage the agreement
`factor, R, between observed (obs) and calculated (calc)
`structure factors (F), R = I(Fobs - FcW1)/-(Fob), was 42%.
`A solvent-flattened (25) electron density map at 3.5-A reso-
`lution (m = 0.81, AO = 350) allowed the tracing of most of the
`
`10
`E V Q L Q Q S G A E L V R A G
`GAGGTTCAGCTTCAGCAGT
`
`A
`
`A_*_ _
`
`*_
`
`_
`
`A
`
`*_
`
`A------R
`N
`A
`
`S
`
`GERMLINE
`
`R19.9
`
`(
`
`not sequenced
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`polypeptide chain. The amino acid sequence of Fab R19.9
`was adjusted to the electron density map using the program
`FRODO (26) on a PS300 Evans and Sutherland interactive
`graphics system. The model was refined by the restrained
`least-squares program PROLSQ (27) by using reflections be-
`tween 10- and 2.8-A resolution. After 33 cycles of refinement
`(R = 32.4%), the model was partially rebuilt based on
`difference Fourier (2Fwca - Fobs, acwc) and "OMIT" (28)
`maps, as well as inspection of the solvent-flattened electron
`density map. The structure was further improved by alter-
`nating model building on difference Fourier and OMIT maps
`followed by PROLsQ refinement until reasonable convergence
`was achieved (see Table 1). The current R factor is 0.296. No
`attempt was made to place solvent molecules in the model.
`Sequencing ofpolysomal mRNA for VH and VK was carried
`out according to Griffiths and Milstein (29) by using primers
`described previously (30, 31).
`
`RESULTS
`The 3.5-A resolution electron density map described above
`was used to fit the amino acid sequences of the variable
`regions [VH, D, and JH2 and also VK and JK (see Figs. 1 and
`2)] and those of the constant regions, CH1 of IgG2b and CK
`(32). Since the sequence of VH was determined for residues
`16-123 only, the first 15 residues were assumed to be the
`same as those in protein 36-65, which expresses the germ-
`line-encoded VH sequence of CRIA (8). This choice seemed
`reasonable because the same VH germ-line gene is expressed
`in 36-65 and R19.9 and because in 11 published N-terminal
`sequences of CRI' mAbs there is a total of only seven amino
`acid substitutions in this region (33, 34). Although the
`electron density maps gave an indication for the trace of the
`polypeptide chain in CDR3 of VH, the detailed conformation
`of this region was less clear than that of other parts of Fab
`R19.9. VH positions 34, 55, 58, 59, and 74 differ from those
`of the germ-line VH gene; however, the electron density map
`showed good agreement with the experimentally determined
`VH sequence (Fig. 1) at those positions. Although the
`ambiguity (His/Asp) at VH position 105 cannot be resolved
`with certainty by the electron density map, aspartic acid
`---CDR 1---
`
`40
`V V K Q R P
`
`70
`50
`60
`G Q G L E V I G Y I N P G N G Y T K Y N L K F K G K T T L
`AAGTTCAGGGCAGACCACACTG
`L S
`K
`Or-GT-T
`
`G
`
`T V
`
`D K S
`
`S
`
`S
`
`T
`
`80
`A Y M Q L R S
`
`L T
`
`90
`S E D
`
`S A V Y
`
`98
`C A R
`
`F
`
`ACTGTAGACAMTCCTCCAGCACAGCCTACATGCAGCTCAGAGCCTGACATCTGAGGACTCTGCAGTCTATTTCTGTGCAAGA
`R
`
`GERMLINE
`
`R19.9
`
`GERMLINE
`
`R19.9
`
`36-65
`
`R19.9
`
`V
`S
`TCGGTC
`F
`
`-r-
`
`D segment
`S
`G G
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`I
`
`H/D L A V
`-c
`C;.ACCTAGCCM
`
`_--
`
`Je2
`Y F D Y V G Q G T T L T V S
`S
`Y
`TACTACITTGACTACTGGGGCCAAGGCACCACTCTCACAGTCTCCFCA
`s
`---c
`
`FIG. 1.
`Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the VH region of mAb R19.9. They are compared, between residues 1-98, with
`the VH germ-line sequence believed to encode CRIA molecules (8). The D and JH2 segments are compared with those of mAb 36-65, whose
`VH gene (codons 1-98) corresponds to that of an unmutated germ-line gene (8). A solid line represents identity with the prototype sequence.
`Amino acid substitutions are indicated above the nucleotide sequences. Gaps have been introduced in the D segment to maximize homology.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1060 Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`Immunology: Lascombe et al.
`
`----c
`
`609
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`CDR 1-------------
`30
`20
`10
`S N T
`R V T
`I
`L N
`0
`G
`S
`D
`C
`S
`I
`R A
`Q D
`L
`S
`A
`S
`L
`S
`M
`I
`T T
`S
`D
`Q
`T
`GATATCCAGATGACACAGACTACATCCTCCcGTCTGCCTCTCTGGGAGACAGAGTCACCATCAGTTGcAGGGCAAGTCAGGACATTAGCTTAATrAAAC
`VK10
`R19.9 XC
`--------CDR 2-------
`60
`50
`40
`S G
`S
`G
`Y
`S
`T
`S
`R
`L
`B
`S
`G
`V
`P
`R
`F
`T V K
`L
`L
`I
`Y
`V
`Y
`Q
`Q K
`P
`D G
`TGGTATCAGCAGAAACCAGATGGAACTGTTACACTGATCTACTACACATCAAGATTACACTCAGGAGTCCCATCAAGGTTCAGTGGCAGTGGG
`I-x
`x
`x
`----------CDR 3--.------
`70
`80
`90
`Y F C O O G
`N
`T
`L
`P
`T
`S
`A
`I
`D
`E
`E
`L
`N
`0
`I
`L T
`G T
`S
`D
`S
`Y
`TCTGGAACAGArrATrCTCTCACCATTAGCAACCTGGAGCAAGAAGATATTGCCACTTACTrrTGCCAACAGGGTAATACGCTTCCT
`S
`
`VK1O
`R19.9
`
`VK10
`R19.9
`
`JK1
`R19.9
`
`100
`T K L
`K
`I
`E
`G
`G
`F
`T
`G
`ACGTTCGGTGGAGGCACCAAGCTGGAAATCAAA
`? R
`?
`
`vw
`
`lr
`
`R
`
`,---
`
`Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences ofthe VK region of mAb R19.9. Comparison is made with sequences ofthe VK1O-Ars-A
`FIG. 2.
`and JK1 genes that encode CRIU mAb (9). See legend to Fig. 1. ?, undetermined nucleotide.
`
`seems to be the best choice. Electron density features in VL
`positions 31, 55, and 107 correspond reasonably well with the
`amino acid sequence encoded by the VK10-Ars-A germ-line
`gene that encodes the VL region ofCRI' antibodies and to the
`JKl germ-line sequence (Fig. 2). At position 105, where an
`ambiguity in the nucleotide sequence is consistent with the
`presence of alanine, glutamic acid, glycine, or valine, the
`electron density map favors glutamic acid, in agreement with
`the germ-line JK1 sequence.
`The domain structure of Fab R19.9 closely follows that
`observed for all Fabs whose three-dimensional structure has
`been determined by x-ray diffraction to date (reviewed in
`refs. 35 and 36). The quaternary structure of Fab R19.9 is that
`of an extended conformation. This conformation is usually
`described by reference to an "elbow" angle made by the
`pseudo 2-fold axes relating VH to VL and CH1 to CL. For Fab
`R19.9 this angle is 1780, which is the largest (closest to 1800)
`so far observed in Fab structures. The rotation-translation
`operations necessary to superimpose selected a-carbon
`backbones of VH and VL are 1750 and 0.45 A, respectively,
`indicating a nearly ideal symmetry relationship between
`those domains. The numerical values for the corresponding
`operations in the CH-CL domains are 1680 and 1.5 A, values
`similar to those of other known Fab structures.
`A measure of the closeness of the Fab R19.9 structure to
`that of several other Fab molecules can be obtained by
`analyzing the shifts in the relative positions of packed
`,8-sheets (37). Thus, if the spatial superposition of the VH or
`VL 131 sheets is optimized, the (32 sheets of different Fabs
`(listed in Table 2) are no further away than an average of 0.55
`and a rotation angle of 90 from the corresponding sheet of
`Fab R19.9.
`The relative disposition of VH and VL in Fab R19.9 can be
`further compared to those of other Fabs by superposing the
`a-carbon coordinates of the residues that define the interface
`between the VH and VL subunits, as described in Table 2. The
`largest deviations that were observed for Fab R19.9 are 1.5
`A and 12.8°. These deviations and others observed with
`different Fabs do not appear to be significant.
`
`DISCUSSION
`The three-dimensional structure of Fab R19.9 presented here
`provides a structural model of a specific hapten-binding mAb
`of predefined specificity. The calculation of electron density
`maps at 2.8-A resolution by x-ray crystallographic techniques
`and the determination of amino acid sequences (through
`nucleotide sequencing of the mRNAs) of VH and VL allowed
`the tracing of most of the polypeptide chain. However,
`although the general position of VH CDR3 is clearly indicated
`
`in the different electron density maps that were calculated, its
`side chains could not be placed unambiguously. The ambi-
`guity may arise from an intrinsic high mobility of VH CDR3.
`This possibility is supported by the fact that the long VH
`CDR3 loop protrudes into the solvent beyond other parts of
`the molecule (see Fig. 3).
`The three-dimensional structure of Fab R19.9 agrees well
`with those of other Fabs that have been determined. It
`displays the largest elbow angle that has been observed in
`Fabs, in agreement with the idea that an extended (or
`contracted) conformation is independent of ligand binding to
`the combining site. As shown in Table 2, the relative dispo-
`sition of VH and VL in Fab R19.9 is well within a spectrum
`of angular and translational values observed in a number of
`Fabs, irrespective of their human or murine origin or of their
`liganded or unliganded state. The difference in relative
`disposition of VH and VL observed by Colman et al. (45) in
`a neuraminidase complex falls in the range of those observed
`in Table 2, indicating that formation of a complex with
`
`Table 2. The relative arrangements of VH and VL domains in
`different Fabs
`HyS
`
`J539 McPC603 R19.9
`Kol
`D1.3
`New
`0.68 A 0.69 A
`0.53 A
`0.49 A 0.70 A 0.42 A
`0.95 A 0.62 A
`0.54 A 0.69 A 0.67 A
`0.39 A
`0.78 A 0.61 A
`0.74 A 0.73 A
`0.56 A
`0.92 A 0.55 A
`0.56 A 0.49 A
`0.30 A
`0.82 A 0.87 A
`0.64A
`0.80 A
`0.62 A
`0.92 A 0.56 A
`0.57 A
`0.75 A 0.77 A
`0.62 A
`1.03 A 0.64 A
`0.54 A
`0.71 A 0.57 A
`0.88 A 0.59 A
`0.69A
`0.93 A
`
`HyS
`
`Kol
`
`New
`
`J539
`
`McPC603
`
`R19.9
`
`D1.3
`
`0.96 A
`8.50
`0.36 A
`1.14 A
`3.60
`5.00
`1.14 A 1.14A
`0.70 A
`11.00
`4.50
`6.70
`0.68 A
`0.74 A 0.72 A 0.44 A
`4.90
`5.40
`3.80
`7.20
`1.93 A
`1.19 A 1.08 A 2.13 A
`1.69 A
`8.0°
`9.10
`6.90
`12.80
`6.90
`0.53 A 0.38 A 0.90 A
`0.91 A
`1.22 A
`0.46 A
`6.80
`1.90
`2.60
`5.10
`4.80
`9.50
`Atomic coordinates for Fab Kol (38), New (22), McPC603 (39),
`J539 (40), and HyS (41) were obtained from the Brookhaven Data
`Bank (42, 43), and those of Fab D1.3 (44) were obtained from the
`authors. The VL domain of the Fab corresponding to each horizontal
`row was mapped into the VL of the Fab in the column by using
`a-carbon coordinates of residues defining the interface between VH
`and VL domains (45). The calculated transformation was applied to
`the Fab corresponding to the horizontal row, and the additional
`translation (A) and rotation (0) to optimize overlap between the
`corresponding pair of VH domains are given in the lower left triangle.
`The upper right triangle gives the corresponding root-mean-square
`distances for the pair of VL'S (upper number of each pair) and VH'S
`(lower number).
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1060 Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`610
`
`Immunology: Lascombe et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`by Jeske et al. (46), although orientations of these residues
`were not known.
`Site-directed mutagenesis (47) and chain recombination
`studies (48) have implicated VH Ser-99 and VL Arg-96, re-
`spectively, as residues that are important in Ar binding.
`Inspection of the model of Fab R19.9 shows that the guani-
`dino group of VL Arg-96 is at the bottom of the narrow cavity
`between VH and VL and that it could participate in direct
`contacts with an Ar ligand. Thus, it provides a positively
`charged group that could neutralize the negative charge ofthe
`Ar hapten. Ser-99 in VH appears less accessible to interac-
`tions with an external ligand. However, it and Arg-96 may be
`important in hapten binding not only because they could
`contribute direct contacts with Ar but also through stabilizing
`interactions with other amino acid residues at the combining
`site of the antibody itself. A precise identification of residues
`contacting bound Ar will require the determination of the
`three-dimensional structure of a hapten-Fab complex.
`The presence of a long VH CDR3 loop in R19.9 has two
`major effects on the structure of the combining site: (i) it
`partially fills what otherwise would be a large cavity or
`depression surrounded by the other CDRs of VH and VL; and
`(ii) it provides a protruding structural feature that appears
`unique to R19.9 among other Fab structures that have been
`determined. It is interesting to compare this loop with that of
`human VH KOL (38). Although KOL's CDR3 is three amino
`acids longer, it is partially bent inwards, thus resulting in a
`less salient loop than that of R19.9 (Fig. 4).
`The anti-Ar mAb R19.9 expresses some but not all id-
`iotopes associated with CRIA. The nucleotide and amino acid
`sequences of its VH and VK regions are consistent with the
`possibility that they are somatic variants of the germ-line VH
`and VK genes that encode CRIA antibodies (Figs. 1 and 2). In
`addition, R19.9 utilizes the canonical JH2 of CRIA. A major
`distinction in R19.9 is the contribution of a D gene segment
`giving rise to an atypical CDR3 that contains three more
`amino acid residues than are present in mAbs that fully
`express CRIA. The typical eight-residue D sequence appears
`to arise from the DFL16.1 genetic segment (10). The unusual,
`longer D segment as well as the three amino acid substitutions
`in VH CDR2 are likely to account for the incomplete expres-
`sion of CRIA idiotopes in R19.9. In agreement with this
`conclusion, the L chain of R19.9, when combined with the H
`chain of a CRI' mAb, yields a recombinant molecule that
`expresses CRIA, whereas the converse recombinant,
`HR19.9LCRI is idiotypically inactive (14).
`The partial idiotypic cross-reactivity between R19.9 and
`CRI) mAbs can be explained by the presence, in anti-
`idiotype sera, of antibodies that recognize residues in VH and
`VL other than those in VH CDR3. Small differences in the
`primary structure of R19.9 and the germ-line-encoded struc-
`ture owing to somatic mutations, as well as the large
`difference in D-region structure, could also contribute to the
`lack of total identity in serological tests. Among the somatic
`variations, the change from Ile-34 to Val in VH R19.9 does not
`seem adequate to explain a change in antigenic properties
`since the amino acid side chain at that position is not exposed.
`The sequence variations observed at positions Lys-55, Tyr-
`57, Leu-58, and Ser-59 in CDR2 and Arg-74 in FR3 could
`readily affect recognition of idiotopes since they are exposed
`at the accessible surface of VH.
`Characterization of two antigenic determinants occurring
`on a native protein (41, 44) indicates that the antigen-
`antibody interface extends over an area of about 700 A2 and
`includes residues from each of the VH and VL CDRs.
`Contacts with an anti-idiotype antibody might similarly
`include residues from all CDRs. Thus, given the solvent-
`exposed location and the spatial proximity of the CDR loops
`it is most reasonable to expect that the VL as well as VH CDRs
`will contribute to many combining-site related idiotopes.
`
`FIG. 3. A superposition of a portion of the a-carbon backbones
`of Fabs Kol (38) and R19.9. The VH CIQR3 of the Fabs have very
`different conformations. That of R19.9 is labeled and indicated by a
`slightly thinner trace. The numbers above 300 represent position
`numbers in the VH sequence of R19.9 plus 300.
`
`antigen is not necessary to produce the observed variability
`in the relative disposition of VH and VL.
`The CDRs of R19.9 contain a striking number of aromatic
`side chains, mostly tyrosines, which are oriented in such a
`way that they expose their phenolic OH groups to the solvent
`(see Fig. 4). These include the VH tyrosines 27, 32, 57, 101,
`and 109. VH Phe-100 in this region is also exposed to the
`solvent. VH Phe-29, Tyr-50, and Tyr-110 are oriented towards
`the interior of the structure, thus precluding their participa-
`tion in contacts with ligands. In VL, Tyr-32, Tyr-49, and
`Tyr-50 are oriented with their side chains pointing towards
`the solvent. Thus, a total of nine aromatic side chains
`belonging to the VH and VL CDRs, mostly tyrosines, are
`positioned to provide possible contacts with antigen. The
`prevalence of tyrosine residues in these CDRs has been noted
`
`FIG. 4. A view of the combining site of Fab R19.9, which shows
`a high density of aromatic residues, mostly tyrosine VL is at left; VH
`is at right. The numbers above 300 represent positions in the VH
`sequence plus 300 (i.e., CA 401 = VH residue 101, etc.). Lower
`numbers are positions in VL-
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1060 Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`Immunology: Lascombe et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989)
`
`611
`
`Note Added in Proof. After this paper was submitted for publication,
`Stevens et al. (49) reported differences in low and high ionic strength
`crystalline forms of human immunoglobulin L-chain dimer Loc,
`which they take to indicate different potential conformations of an
`antibody. The different VL-VL contacts observed in Loc, as well as
`those between VH and VL domains in FabNC41 complexed to
`antigen (45), are postulated (49) to increase antigenic and idiotypic
`specificities ofantibodies. However, as shown in Table 2, the VH-VL
`contacts observed in NC41 are within the range observed in Fabs,
`independently of their liganded (D1.3 and Hy5) or nonliganded
`states. Since Table 2 includes Fabs crystallized at low (Hy5, D1.3,
`and R19.9) and high ionic strength (Kol, New, J539, and McPC603),
`the conformational variations observed in Loc may be unique to it or
`to L chains, which do not normally occur as dimers in nature. The
`lack of significant differences in the relative disposition of VH and VL
`thus far observed in liganded or unliganded Fabs does not seem to
`suggest that such differences could contribute to increase the
`functional diversity of antibodies.
`
`We wish to thank Dr. Claude Riche (Centre National de la
`Recherche Scientifique, Gif sur Yvette, France) for the interpreta-
`tion of the electron density map of R19.9 at 6-A resolution by means
`of a six-dimensional real space search. This work was supported by
`grants from the Institut Pasteur, Centre National de la Recherche
`Scientifique, contract BAP-0221(DC) from the European Economic
`Community, and by National Institutes of Health grants AI-25369
`and AI-22068.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`18.
`
`19.
`
`Kuettner, M. G., Wang, A. L. & Nisonoff, A. (1972) J. Exp.
`Med. 135, 579-595.
`Nisonoff, A., Ju, S.-T. & Owen, F. L. (1977) Immunol. Rev. 34,
`89-118.
`Greene, M. I., Nelles, M. J., Sy, M.-S. & Nisonoff, A. (1982)
`Adv. Immunol. 32, 253-300.
`Rathbun, G., Sanz, I., Meek, K., Tucker, P. & Capra, J. D.
`(1988) Adv. Immunol. 42, 95-164.
`Manser, T., Wysocki, L. J., Margolies, M. N. & Gefter, M. L.
`(1987) Immunol. Rev. 96, 141-162.
`Pawlak, L. L., Mushinski, E. B., Nisonoff, A. & Potter, M.
`(1973) J. Exp. Med. 137, 22-31.
`Laskin, J. A., Gray, A., Nisonoff, A., Klinman, N. R. &
`Gottlieb, P. G. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 4600-
`4604.
`Siekevitz, M., Huang, S.-Y. & Gefter, M. L. (1983) Eur. J.
`Immunol. 13, 123-132.
`Sanz, I. & Capra, J. D. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84,
`1085-1089.
`Landolfi, N. F., Capra, J. D. & Tucker, P. W. (1986) J.
`Immunol. 137, 362-365.
`Meek, K., Sanz, I., Rathbun, G., Nisonoff, A. & Capra, J. D.
`(1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6244-6248.
`Estess, P., Lamoyi, E., Nisonoff, A. & Capra, J. D. (1980) J.
`Exp. Med. 151, 863-875.
`Gill-Pazaris, L. A., Brown, A. R. & Nisonoff, A. (1979) Ann.
`Immunol. (Paris) 130C, 199-213.
`Gill-Pazaris, L. A., Lamoyi, E., Brown, A. R. & Nisonoff, A.
`(1981) J. Immunol. 126, 75-79.
`Lamoyi, E., Estess, P., Capra, J. D. & Nisonoff, A. (1980) J.
`Immunol. 124, 2834-2840.
`Amit, A. G., Harper, M., Mariuzza, R. A., Saludjian, P.,
`Poljak, R. J., Lamoyi, E. & Nisonoff, A. (1983) J. Mol. Biol.
`165, 415-417.
`Porter, R. R. (1959) Biochem. J. 73, 119-127.
`Wlodawer, A. & Hodgson, K. 0. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA 72, 398-399.
`Mariuzza, R. A., Amit, A. G., Boulot, G., Saludjian, P., Saul,
`F., Tougard, P., Poljak, R. J., Conger, J., Lamoyi, E. &
`Nisonoff, A. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 5954-5958.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`25.
`26.
`27.
`
`28.
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`Oatley, S. & French, S. (1982) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 38,
`537-549.
`North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Matthews, F. S. (1968) Acta
`Crystallogr. Sect. A 24, 351-358.
`Saul, F. A., Amzel, L. M. & PolIjak, R. J. (1978) J. Biol. Chem.
`253, 585-597.
`Crowther, R. A. (1972) The Molecular Replacement Method,
`ed. Rossmann, M. G. (Gordon & Breach, New York), pp. 173-
`178.
`Sussman, J. L. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 115, 271-303.
`Wang, B. C. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 115, 90-122.
`Jones, T. A. (1985) Methods Enzymol. 115, 157-171.
`Hendrickson, W. A. & Konnert, J. H. (1980) in Computing in
`Crystallography, eds. Diamond, R., Ramaseshan, S. & Ven-
`katesan, K. (Indian Acad. Sci., Bangalore, India), pp. 13.01-
`13.25.
`Bhat, T. N. (1988) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 279-281.
`Griffiths, G. M. & Milstein, C. (1985) in Hybridoma Technol-
`ogy in Biosciences and Medicine, ed. Springer, T. A. (Plenum,
`New York), pp. 103-115.
`Kaartinen, M., Griffiths, G. M. & Milstein, C. (1983) Nature
`(London) 304, 320-324.
`Robbins, P. F., Rosen, E. M., Haba, S. & Nisonoff, A. (1986)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1050-1054.
`Kabat, E. A., Wu, T. T., Reid-Miller, M., Perry, H. M. &
`Gottesman, K. S. (1987) Sequences ofProteins ofImmunolog-
`ical Interest (U.S. Public Health Service, National Institutes of
`Health, Bethesda, MD), 4th Ed.
`Slaughter, C. A. & Capra, J. D. (1984) in Biology ofIdiotypes,
`eds. Greene, M. I. & Nisonoff, A. (Plenum, New York), pp.
`35-58.
`Huang, S. Y., Margolies, M. N., Marshak-Rothstein, A.,
`Siekevitz, M. & Gefter, M. L. (1982) Pharmacol. Rev. 34, 43-
`49.
`Davies, D. R. & Metzger, H. A. (1983) Annu. Rev. Immunol.
`1, 87-117.
`Alzari, P. M., Lascombe, M.-B. & Poljak, R. J. (1988) Annu.
`Rev. Immunol. 6, 555-580.
`Lesk, A. M. & Chothia, C. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 160, 325-342.
`Marquart, M., Deisenhofer, J., Huber, R. & Palm, W. (1980) J.
`Mol. Biol. 141, 369-391.
`Satow, Y., Cohen, G. H., Padlan, E. A. & Davies, D. R. (1986)
`J. Mol. Biol. 190, 593-604.
`Suh, S. W., Bhat, T. N., Navia, M. A., Cohen, G. H., Rao,
`D. N., Rudikoff, S. & Davies, D. R. (1986) Proteins 1, 74-80.
`Sheriff, S., Silverton, E. W., Padlan, E. A., Cohen, G. H.,
`Smith-Gill, S. J., Finzel, B. C. & Davies, D. R. (1987) Proc.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 8075-8079.
`Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Jr.,
`Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O.,
`Shimanouchi, T. & Tasumi, M. (1977) J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535-
`542.
`Abola, E. E., Bernstein, F. C., Bryant, S. H., Koetzle, T. F.
`& Weng, J. (1987) In Crystallographic Databases: Information
`Content, Software Systems, Scientific Applications, eds. Allen,
`F. H., Bergerhoff, G. & Sievers, R. (Data Commission of the
`Int. Union of Crystallography, Bonn), pp. 107-132.
`Amit, A. G., Mariuzza, R. A., Phillips, S. E. V. & Poljak,
`R. J. (1986) Science 233, 747-753.
`Colman, P. M., Laver, W. G., Varghese, J. N., Baker, A. T.,
`Tulloch, P. A., Air, G. M. & Webster, R. G. (1987) Nature
`(London) 326, 358-363.
`Jeske, D., Milner, E. C. B., Leo, O., Moser, M., Marvel, J.,
`Urbain, J. & Capra, J. D. (1986) J. Immunol. 136, 2568-2574.
`Sharon, J., Gefter, M. L., Manser, T. & Ptashne, M. (1986)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2628-2631.
`Jeske, D. J., Jarvis, J., Milstein, C. & Capra, J. D. (1984) J.
`Immunol. 133, 1090-1092.
`Stevens, F. J., Chang, C. H. & Schiffer, M. (1988) Proc. Natl.
`Acad. Sci. USA 85, 6895-6899.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1060 Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket