throbber
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 845-848, March 1974
`
`Variable Region Sequences of Five Human Immunoglobulim Heavy Chains
`of the VHTTI Subgroup: Definitive Identification of Four Heavy
`Chain Hypervariable Regions
`(myeloma proteins/amino acid sequences/antibody combining site)
`
`J. DONALD CAPRA AND J. MICHAEL KEHOE
`
`Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, 10 East 102 Street, New York, N.Y. 10029
`
`kappa), and Tur (IgAl kappa) were isolated from serum or
`plasma by zone electrophoresis on polyvinyl copolymer
`("Pevicon") (8). After further purification by gel filtration
`chromatography, they were reduced with 0.1 M fl-mercapto-
`ethanol and alkylated with iodoacetamide. The heavy
`and light chains were separated by gel filtration in propionic
`acid (9, 10).
`Fragment Preparation: Heavy chains were treated with
`cyanogen bromide (11) and the resulting individual frag-
`ments purified by gel filtration chromatography in 5 M guani-
`dine * HCl. Three proteins (Tei, Zap, and Tur) yielded a
`large N-terminal fragment comprising residues 1-85. Pro-
`teins Was and Jon, which contain a methionine residue at
`position 34, gave fragments comprising residues 1-34 and
`35-85. Since all human IgG myelomas have a methionine at
`position 252, Tei and Was yielded a large fragment comprising
`residues 86-252. In protein Jonj however, an additional
`methionine was present at position 111. Consequently two
`distinct fragments comprising residues 86-111 and 112-252
`were obtained from this protein. IgAl proteins contain a
`methionine at residue 426 (12) so proteins Zap and Tur both
`yielded a very large fragment composed of residues 86-426.
`Sequencing Procedure. Positions 1-85: On both the intact
`heavy chain as well as on the 1-85 fragment, proteins Tei,
`Zap, and Tur were sequenced 60 steps on the automated se-
`quencer (13, 14). Tryptic peptides were prepared and sepa-
`rated on Dowex 50X4 with a pyridine-formate buffer system.
`In proteins Tei and Zap two invariant peptides were aligned
`by homology alone (70-74 and 75-78) while in protein Tur,
`
`12 3 4 56
`H
`H H
`
`7
`I-I
`
`8
`H
`
`9
`
`10
`I
`
`6.0 -
`OZ 5.0-
`W~ 4.0-
`
`Communicated by Henry G. Kunkel, November 5, 1973
`
`ABSTRACT
`The variable regions of five human immu-
`noglobulin heavy chains of the VHIII subgroup have been
`totally sequenced. Three of the heavy chains belonged to
`the IgG class and two to the IgA class. Examination of
`these sequences, and comparison with additional pub-
`lished heavy chain sequences, showed that a total offour
`hypervariable regions is characteristic of human heavy
`chain variable regions.
`The relatively conserved character of large segments of
`the heavy chain variable region was very evident in these
`studies. The conserved segments, which are those sections
`located outside the hypervariable regions, comprise ap-
`proximately 65% of the total heavy chain variable region.
`The following general structural pattern for antibody
`molecules emerges from this and related studies: an over-
`all combining region superstructure is provided by the
`more conserved segments while the refinements of the
`active site specificity are a function of hypervariable re-
`gions.
`The antibody combining site is now believed to reside ex-
`clusively in the variable regions of the heavy and light poly-
`peptide chains of the immunoglobulin molecule. Evidence
`is accumulating from several laboratories which indicates
`that hypervariable regions within the variable region are
`directly involved in the antibody combining site as well as
`being responsible, at least in part, for the idiotypic determi-
`nants of myeloma proteins and specific antibodies (1-5).
`The existence of three hypervariable regions in the vari-
`able region of human immunoglobulin heavy chains has been
`established by previous studies from this laboratory. Resi-
`dues 31-37 were described as the first hypervariable region
`of the heavy chain (6), and, after fragmentation of IgG
`heavy chains with cyanogen bromide, two additional hyper-
`variable regions were localized between residues 86-91 and
`101-110 (7).
`We have now completed the amino acid sequence from
`residues 41 to 84 of the three VHIII proteins originally re-
`ported (6, 7) as well as the complete V region sequence of
`two IgA proteins with VHIII variable regions. The data
`make apparent an additional area of sequence hypervari-
`ability between residues 51 and 68, thus supporting the ob-
`servations of Cebra et al. made on pooled guinea-pig immuno-
`globulins (5). When these data on VHIII proteins are in-
`cluded with that available for proteins of the VHI and VHII
`subgroups and analyzed by the method of Wu and Kabat (3),
`four distinct areas of sequence hypervariability are observed.
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Myeloma Proteins. Tei (IgG1 kappa, Gm az), Was (IgG1
`kappa, Gm az), Jon (IgG3 lambda, Gm g), Zap (IgAl
`
`845
`
`0 fm
`
`FIG. 1.
`
`0o20 30
`hydrolysate of the amino terminal (1-85) cyanogen bromide
`f a chain from protein Tuir. Peptides were isolated
`fragent
`from a Dowex 50X4 column and characterized and analyzed as
`described in the test.
`
`40
`
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`Representative ion exchange chromatogram of tryptic
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1092 Page 1 of 4
`
`

`
`846
`
`Immunology:
`
`Capra and Kehoe
`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974)
`
`GLU VAL GoN LEU VAL GLU
`
`20
`10
`SER GLY GLY GLY LEU VAL GLN PRO GLY GLY SER LEU ARG LEU SER CYS ALA ALA SER
`
`Tei
`
`Was
`
`Joh
`
`zap
`
`Tur
`
`Tei
`
`Was
`
`Jon
`
`Zap
`
`Tur
`
`Tei
`
`Was
`
`Jon
`
`LYS
`
`ALA
`
`ASP
`
`LEU
`
`LEU
`
`30
`GLY PHE THE PHE SEE
`
`UE
`
`SER
`
`_ ASP
`
`SER ALA VAL TYR (
`I
`ALA TRP MET LYS r
`
`ET
`
`40
`50
`1 TRP VAL ARG GLN ALA PRO GLY LYS GLY LEU GLU TRP VAL
`
`I I
`
`1 I
`
`THR SER ARG PHE r
`
`ARG VAL LEU SER SER i
`
`60
`GLY TRP ARG TYR GLU GLY SER SER LEU THE HIS TWi ALA
`
`70
`VAL SER VAL ow GLY ARG PHE TER
`
`ILE SER ARG ASK
`
`ALA
`
`VAL
`
`LYS
`
`Go
`
`GLU ALA _
`
`ASH SER
`
`PHE
`
`ASP TH_ AS8
`
`VAL
`
`GIo
`
`VAL VAL GLU LYS ALA PHE
`
`ASN _
`
`ASN
`
`Zap
`
`Tur
`
`Tei
`
`Was
`
`Jon
`
`Zap
`
`Tur
`
`Te i
`
`Was
`
`Jon
`
`Zap
`
`Tur
`
`GLU PHIE
`
`VAL GI
`
`AA ILE SER
`
`ASP
`
`ALA
`
`-_
`
`SER GLY
`
`LEU ASN ALA
`
`ASN LEU
`
`PHE
`
`ALA ___
`
`80
`too
`90
`ASP SER LYS AS1N THR LEU TYR LEU GUI MET LEU SER LEU GLU PRO GLK ASX U ALA VAL TYR TYR CYS ALA ARG
`
`-
`
`ASN ARG
`
`ALA
`
`ILE
`
`VAL
`
`U
`
`ASN THR GLY
`
`ALA
`
`GUI ALA
`
`LEU
`
`110
`120
`VAL THR PRO ALA ALA ALA SER LEU THR PHE SER ALA VAL TRP GLY GLI GLY THR LEU VAL THR
`
`PHE ARG GIN PRO PHE VAL GLI
`
`[
`
`_
`
`PHE ASP
`
`PHE
`
`VAL VAL SER UHR [
`
`THR ARG -GLY GLY TYR [
`
`] SER MET ASP
`
`]
`
`ASP
`
`PRO
`
`SER
`
`LEU SER VAL
`
`VAL [
`] ALA PHE ASP
`LYS
`SER
`FIG. 2. The amino-acid sequence of the variable regions of five human immunoglobulin heavy chains.
`
`the isolation of chymotryptic peptides established the se-
`quence unambiguously. In all cases, tryptic peptides were
`sequenced in the automated sequencer, often using 4-sulfo-
`phenylisothiocyanate (Pierce Chemical) on the lysine pep-
`tides (15). In proteins Was and Jon, which contained cyano-
`gen bromide fragments 1-34 and 35-85, the first 60 residues
`were established by automated sequencing of the intact
`heavy chain. Thus, in these two proteins, sequencing
`cyanogen bromide fragment 1-34 was superfluous since its
`composition agreed with the previously determined sequence.
`
`Fragment 35-85 of proteins Was and Jon was sequenced 35
`and 40 residues respectively; this, together with the C-
`terminal tryptic peptides mentioned above gave the com-
`plete sequence for this section. Residues 86-121: In proteins
`Tei, Was, Zap, and Tur the sequence was established by a
`continuous automated run of 45 steps from residue 86 into
`the CH1 domain. In both Zap and Tur, tryptic digestion and
`isolation of the resulting peptides confirmed a few question-
`able positions. In protein Jon, residues 86-111 were obtained
`disulfide linked to residues 1-34 after cyanogen bromide
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1092 Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974)
`
`Human Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains
`
`847
`
`GAP
`
`GAP
`
`GAP
`
`70
`
`60-
`
`50-
`
`:2 40-
`
`X 30
`
`I0-
`
`digestion. This sequence was obtained by difference since
`residues 1-34 were known from the initial study of the
`intact heavy chain. Jon fragment 112-253 was subjected to a
`long sequencer run which definitely established the sequence
`of residues 112-121 as well as providing sequence data into
`the CH1 domain.
`Ion Exchange Chromatography. An example of a Dowex
`50X4 chromatogram is shown in Fig. 1 for a tryptic digest
`of the Tur 1-85 fragment; 6.5-ml fractions were collected and
`0.1 ml of each fraction analyzed by the fluorescamine pro-
`cedure initially described by Udenfriend et al. (16). Ninhydrin
`analysis was also performed after alkaline digestion of 0.5-ml
`aliquots. In most analyses, only the fluorescamine procedure
`was employed since it was much more sensitive. As shown in
`Fig. 1, 10 fractions were pooled. Each was subjected to amino-
`acid analysis and several useful peptides were isolated and
`sequenced. T-1 (Asn Thr Leu Tyr Leu Gln Hsr) (79-85), T-3
`(Asn Asp Ser Lys) (75-78), T-7 (Gly Leu Gly Trp Val Ser
`Gly Arg) (46-53), and T-10 (Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg) (70-74).
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`The amino-acid sequences of the variable regions of the
`five human myeloma proteins is displayed in Fig. 2. The
`variability-factor values determined by the method of Wu
`and Kabat (3) for these as well as all the other human V
`region sequences available is shown in Fig. 3. These calcula-
`tions were based on 25 sequences from residues 1 to 34, 11
`sequences from residues 35 to 85, and 14 sequences from
`residues 86 to 122. Previous to this study there were only six
`published complete V region sequences, all but one (Nie) of
`the VHI (Eu) or VHII (Daw, Cor, He, Ou) subgroup (for
`references see legend to Fig. 3). With five additional VHIII
`sequences the variability within and between subgroups can
`now be compared more meaningfully. In addition, with the
`availability of 11 complete sequences and several fragments,
`the Wu-Kabat plot becomes more statistically significant.
`A discussion of the sequences can be conveniently divided
`into those sections of the V region which are relatively con-
`stant (1-30, 38-50, 69-83, 92-100, and 111-121), and the
`hypervariable regions (31-37, 51-68, 84-91, and 101-110).
`About 65% of the variable region of the heavy chain shows
`limited variation. In fact, there are 17 positions (14%) which
`have been absolutely invariant in all human heavy chains
`regardless of their V region subgroup assignment. Certain
`positions are subgroup specific since at these positions all,
`or nearly all, of the members of one subgroup have a particular
`amino acid, while members of the other subgroup contain a
`different amino acid.
`Utilizing the four available VHII
`proteins, positions 3, 9,16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 28, 29, 39, 42, 46, 50,
`80, 81 and 82 appear to be subgroup specific. As noted
`previously, no subgroup specific residues are identifiable in
`the C terminal portion of the V region (7). There are thus
`33 positions (27%) in the V region which are either invariant
`or subgroup specific. A comparison with the published se-
`18), pooled immuno-
`quences of myeloma proteins (17,
`globulins (5, 19, 20), and specifically purified antibodies (5,
`21-23) from lower species, indicates that the particular
`amino acids found at these positions are characteristic of a
`wide variety of mammals and have been faithfully conserved
`during evolution. Such residues may have extremely im-
`portant attributes for variable region function such as, for
`
`10
`
`20 30 40
`
`60 70 80 90 100 110
`POSITION
`FIG. 3.
`Variability-factor values for the sequences shown in
`Fig. 1 as well as several other published sequences (36) deter-
`mined according to the method of Wu and Kabat (3).
`
`120
`
`example, the provision of a distinct backbone structure which
`is crucial to antibody function.
`As can be seen on inspection of Figs. 2 and 3, about a third
`of the heavy chain variable region can be considered "hyper-
`variable." These regions deserve special consideration be-
`cause of their specific implications for the formation of the
`antibody combining site, the nature of idiotypic determinants,
`and various theoretical conceptions of the origin of antibody
`diversity.
`In light chains, affinity labels have been localized near or
`within hypervariable regions (23-25), thus providing direct
`support for the general concept that hypervariable regions
`participate directly in the antibody-combining site. For the
`heavy chain, recent work has also been consistent with this
`idea. For example, Ray and Cebra localized affinity labels to
`the first (31-37) and the fourth (101-110) heavy chain
`hypervariable regions (26), Haimovich et al. (27) localized
`an affinity label to residue 54 of the mouse myeloma protein
`315 (which has anti-dinitrophenol activity), and Press and
`coworkers have localized affinity labels at or near the fourth
`hypervariable region in rabbit antibodies (28). Therefore,
`although the primary structure and affinity labeling studies
`of these proteins was being carried out independently, and
`even in different laboratories in many instances, there is a gen-
`eral implication from the experimental observations that the
`same regions of the molecule which show the highest degree
`of sequence variation are near or part of those particular re-
`gions of the heavy chain where affinity labels have been local-
`ized.
`A second piece of evidence linking the antibody combining
`site to the hypervariable regions has come from comparisons
`of sequences obtained from pooled immunoglobulin heavy
`chains with those of specifically purified antibody heavy
`chains. Sequence analyses of rabbit (29), guinea pig (5), and
`other mammalian heavy chain pools (19), indicate that a
`definitive sequence cannot be obtained within those regions
`which have been identified as hypervariable on the basis
`of studies with myeloma proteins. However, when specifically
`purified antibodies are studied, a single major sequence can be
`determined, as has been shown most definitively by Cebra and
`his coworkers (5).
`Additional support for the functional significance of hyper-
`variable regions has been provided by current notions con-
`cerning the tertiary structure of the immunoglobulin mole-
`cule. Crystallographic analysis of human immunoglobulins
`has now advanced to the point where it has been possible
`to assign the residues which may line a "pocket" within the
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1092 Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`848
`
`Immunology:
`
`Capra and Kehoe
`
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71 (1974)
`
`immunoglobulin molecule which presumably represents the
`combining site itself (30, 31). In each instance, the major
`residues which line the pocket are associable with hyper-
`variable regions.
`In addition, the conformational models
`generated by the nearest neighbor calculations of Kabat and
`Wii (32) place hypervariable regions in close association
`with the putative combining site.
`There is also growing evidence that at least some of the
`hypervariable regions are involved in the idiotypic determi-
`nants of myeloma proteins and antibodies. Cross idiotypic
`specificity among the cold agglutinins (33) and the anti-
`gamma globulins (34) is believed to be related to the com-
`bining site. In at least two distinct anti-gamma globulin
`molecules, the hypervariable regions show striking sequence
`similarities (7, 35).
`The genetic origin of hypervariable regions remains un-
`clear. The variability within heavy chain hypervariable
`regions seems more marked than that of light chain hyper-
`variable regions. Of the I1 proteins which have now had their
`V regions completely sequenced, if one considers the 43
`hypervariable positions of the heavy chain, there are no two
`proteins which have more than 10 residues in common. It
`seems likely that hundreds, or even thousands, of proteins
`would have to be sequenced in order to find two which are
`identical if no preselection bias (such as selection by idiotypic
`antisera or for combining specificity) is involved. This im-
`plies either that there are a very large number of germ
`line genes or that somatic processes are necessary to explain
`the diversity in the heavy chain hypervariable regions.
`Regardless of their origin, the hypervariable regions clearly
`play a crucial role in the antigen binding function of immuno-
`globulin molecules.
`We thank Dr. Henry Kunkel for the subclass and genetic typ-
`ing of the myeloma proteins. Bonnie Gerber, Ellen Bogner and
`Donna Atherton rendered invaluable technical assistance. This
`work was aided by grants from the National Science Foundation
`(GB 17046) and the U.S. Public Health Service (AI 09810) and a
`Grant-in-Aid from the New York Heart Association. J.D.C. is the
`recipient of National Institutes of Health Career Development
`Award 6-K4-GM-35, and J.M.K. is an Established Investigator
`of the American Heart Association.
`Milstein, C. (1967) Nature 216, 330-332.
`1.
`Franek, F. (1969) Symposium on Developmental Aspects of
`2.
`Antibody Formation and Structure, Prague.
`3. Wu, T. T. & Kabat, E. A. (1970) J. Exp. Med. 132, 221-250.
`Capra, J. D., Kehoe, J. M., Winchester, R. & Kunkel, H. G.
`4.
`(1971) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 190, 371-381.
`Cebra, J. J., Ray, A., Benjamin, D. & Birshtein, B. (1971)
`Progr. Immunol. (First International Congress of Immunol-
`ogy), 269-284.
`Capra, J. D. (1971) Nature New Biol. 230, 61-63.
`Kehoe, J. M. & Capra, J. D. (1971) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
`USA 68, 2019-2021.
`
`6.
`7.
`
`5.
`
`8.
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`25.
`
`Kunkel, H. G. (1954) Methods Biochem. Anal. 1, 141-155.
`Fleischman, J. G., Porter, R. R. & Press, E. M. (1963)
`Biochem. J. 88, 220-228.
`Capra, J. D. & Kunkel, H. G. (1970) J. Clin. Invest. 49,
`610-621.
`Gross, E. & Witkop, B. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1856-
`1863.
`Chuang, C. Y., Capra, J. D. & Kehoe, J. M. (1973) Nature
`244, 158-160.
`13. Edman, P. & Begg, F. (1967) Eur. J. Biochem. 1, 80-91.
`Capra, J. D. & Kunkel, H. G. (1970) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
`14.
`USA 67,87-92.
`Inman, J. K., Hannon, J. E. & Appella, E. (1972) Biochem.
`Biophys. Res. Commun. 46, 2075-2081.
`Udenfriend, S., Stein, S., Bohlen, P., Dairman, W., Leim-
`gruber, W. & Wiegele, M. (1972) Science, 178, 881-882.
`17. Kehoe, J. M. & Capra, J. D. (1972) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
`USA 69,2052-2055.
`Bourgois, A., Fougereau, M. & de Preval, C. (1972) Eur. J.
`Biochem. 24, 446-455.
`Capra, J. D., Wasserman, R. W. & Kehoe, J. M. (1973) J.
`Exp. Med. 138, 410-427.
`Mole, L. E., Jackson, S. A., Porter, R. R. & Wilkinson, J. M.
`(1971) Biochem. J. 124, 301-318.
`Fleischman, J. B. (1973) Immunochemistry 10, 401-407.
`Strosberg, A. D., Jaton, J. C., Capra, J. D. & Haber, E.
`(1972) Fed. Proc. 31, 771.
`Goetzl, E. J. & Metzger, H. (1970) Biochemistry 9, 1267-
`1278.
`Franek, F. (1971) Eur. J. Biochem. 19, 176-183.
`Chesebro, B. & Metzger, H. (1972) Biochemistry 11, 766-
`771.
`Ray, A. & Cebra, J. J. (1972) Biochemistry 11, 3647-3657.
`26.
`27. Haimovich, J., Eisen, H. N., Hurwitz, E. & Givol, D. (1972)
`Biochemistry 11, 2389-2397.
`Press, E. M., Fleet, G. W. J. & Fisher, C. E. (1971) in
`Progress in Immunology, ed. Amos, B. (Academy Press,
`New York), p. 233.
`Cebra, J. J., Givol, D. & Porter, R. R. (1968) Biochem. J.
`107,69-70.
`Schiffer, M., Girling, R. L., Ely, K. R. & Edmundson, A. B.,
`personal communication.
`Poljak, R. J. (1973) Abstracts of Ninth International Con-
`gress ofBiochemistry-Stockholm, p. 31.
`32. Kabat, E. A. & Wu, T. T. (1972) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA
`69, 960-964.
`Williams, R. C., Kunkel, H. G. & Capra, J. D. (1968)
`Science 161, 379-381.
`34. Kunkel, H. G., Agnello, V., Joslin, F. G., Winchester, R. J.
`& Capra, J. D. (1973) J. Exp. Med. 137, 331-342.
`Capra, J. D. & Kehoe, J. M., unpublished observations.
`(a) Edelman, G. M., Cunningham, B. A., Gall, W. E., Gott-
`lieb, P. D., Rutishauser, U., & Waxdal, M. J. (1969) Proc.
`Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 63, 78-85; (b) Press, E. M. & Hogg, N.
`M. (1970) Biochem. J. 117, 641-660; (c) Cunningham, B. A.,
`Pflumm, M. N., Rutishauser, U. & Edelman, G. M. (1969)
`Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 64, 997-1003; (d) Wikler, M.,
`Kohler, H., Shinoda, T. & Putnam, F. W. (1969) Science 163,
`75-78; (e) Ponstingl, H., Schwarz, J., Reichel, W. & Hilsch-
`mann, N.(1970) Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 351, 1591.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`33.
`
`35.
`36.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1092 Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket