throbber
Ann. Rev. ImmunoL 1983. 1:87-1I7
`
`
`
`
`Copyright © 1983 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved
`
`STRUCTURAL BASIS
`
`OF ANTIBODY FUNCTION
`
`David R. Davies and Henry Metzger
`
`National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
`20205
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`It is less than 20 years since the general architecture of antibodies was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`elucidated and even less time since the explicit molecular basis of antibody
`specif
`about the immune system, two basic principles have emerged: (a) Antibod­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ies remain the only known structures whose diversity is sufficient to explain
`
`
`
`the fne specificity exhibited by the immune response; and, (b) antibody
`
`
`
`
`function is mediated by a molecule whose structure consists of two distinct
`
`
`
`
`
`regions-- ne that carries a recognition site for antigenic determinants, and
`
`
`
`
`a second by which the antibody reacts with receptors of a variety of effector
`systems.
`In this review we examine the current information on the structure of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`antibodies. We do not describe again the basic four-chain structure of
`
`
`
`
`
`immunoglobulins nor the division into variable and constant regions, which
`
`
`
`are by now well known (e.g. 4, 90, 1 18). We instead concentrate on the
`
`
`
`
`
`higher resolution data, much of which is still in the course of refinement.
`
`
`
`We discuss the Fabs, in particular with reference to the combining site and
`the specif
`binding site of protein A of Staphylococcus aureus and of Clq; and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`structure of the hinge with reference to its possible role in separating Fab
`and Fe.
`Whereas the characterization of the structures of individual proteins and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of their interactions with small molecules can now be carried out with some .
`
`
`
`0732-0582183/0410-0087$02.00
`
`87
`
`Further
`
`ANNUAL
`REVIEWS
`Quick links to online content
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 1 of 31
`
`

`
`88 DAVIES & METZGER
`
`sophistication, the interaction of two or more macromolecules still presents
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`considerable difficulties. It is not surprising therefore that our under­
`
`
`
`
`
`standing of how antibodies interact with the macromolecular receptors on
`
`
`
`
`
`effector systems (e.g. Clq in the complement pathway, Fc receptors on cell
`
`
`
`membranes) is much less advanced. Our review of this aspect of antibody
`
`
`
`
`structure and function therefore involves more questions than answers.
`
`IMMUNOGLOBULIN STRUCTURE
`
`General Comments
`Our knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of antibodies at atomic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`resolution rests mainly on X-ray diffraction investigations of fragments.
`
`
`
`
`
`Intact proteins for which X-ray analyses have been carried out consist of
`
`
`
`
`
`Kol (106), an IgGl(A) human myeloma protein, the protein Dob (161), an
`
`
`
`IgGl(K) human cryoglobulin, and recently the human myeloma IgGl(A)
`
`
`
`
`protein, Mcg (129). In Kol, and also apparently in another immunoglobu­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lin, Zie (58a), the crystal structure contains an unusual feature: The Fc
`
`
`
`
`occupies a number of different positions in the crystal that are not crystallo­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`graphically related, with the result that no significant electron density oc­
`
`
`curs in this region of the crystal, there being an abrupt drop in density at
`
`the end of the hinge. In both Dob and Mcg there is a 15-amino-acid-residue
`
`
`
`
`deletion in the hinge (63, 169), thus, presumably, reducing the flexibility of
`
`
`
`
`the molecule and enabling the Fc to be located in the electron density,
`
`
`
`although in the case of Dob the crystals are disordered and do not diffract
`to high resolution.
`The structures of three Fabs have been published, Newm (148), Kol
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(106), and McPC603 (152), as well as the structures of a number of VL
`
`dimers and L chain dimers (4). The structure of human IgG Fc has been
`
`
`
`
`determined, and also its complex with protein A of Staphylococcus aureus
`by Amzel & Poljak
`
`
`(43). These structures have been reviewed most recently
`
`
`(4) and are not covered comprehensively in this review.
`Because of the deficiencies in the crystals of the intact molecules, our
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`knowledge of the whole antibody molecule has to be a sum of its parts. The
`
`
`
`
`flexibility of the molecule, in particular in the region between the Fab and
`
`
`the Fc, may preclude for some time visualizing directly by X-ray diffraction
`
`
`
`
`
`an intact molecule with intact hinge at atomic resolution. However, the
`
`
`checks that can be made on this composite three-dimensional picture of the
`
`
`
`
`antibody molecule are reassuring. Thus, the Kol Fab in isolated form in the
`
`
`
`
`crystal is quite similar to the Fab of the whole molecule in its crystal form.
`
`Also, the Fc in Dob has, within the experimental error of the comparison,
`
`
`
`the same overall structure as does the Fc in the isolated Fc crystals.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 2 of 31
`
`

`
`ANTIBODY FUNCTION 89
`
`
`
`Fab Structure and the Antibody Combining Site
`
`McPC603 AND THE PHOSPHOCHOLINE BINDING SITE The structure
`
`of McPC603 Fab, a mouse myeloma IgA (K) with phosphocholine (PC)
`
`
`binding capability, has been determined at 3.l-A resolution (41, 42, 125,
`
`
`1 52) and is being refined to 2.7 A (Y. Satow, D. R. Davies, manuscript in
`
`
`
`preparation). The overall three-dimensional structure of the Fab is illus­
`
`
`
`
`trated in Figure 1, which demonstrates the strong lateral association be­
`
`
`tween domains of the light (L) and heavy (H) chains, together with the
`relatively weak longitudinal interactions along each chain. Figure 1 also
`
`
`shows the clustering of six of the seven hypervariable regions at the tip of
`
`the Fab, forming the complementarity-determining surface (89, 90). The
`
`
`
`
`
`variable domains have a very similar three-dimensional structure for both
`
`
`
`
`the Land H chains and across species (4, 42, 123). The constant domains
`
`
`
`CL and CHI are also very similar. Both the variable and the constant pairs
`
`
`
`of domains are related by approximately twofold (rotation about the V axis
`
`
`
`of 1 800 will superpose V L on V H) and the angle between the two axes has
`
`been referred to as the elbow bend of the Fab and has been observed to vary
`
`G 52C
`
`Figure 1 The a carbon backbone of McPC603 Fab. The heavy chain
`is represented by the
`
`
`
`thick line. The two variable domains are at the top and the constant domains are at the bottom
`residues (CDR) are shown as filed circles.
`
`of the figure. The complementaritydetermining
`Two residues in each CDR loop have been labeled.
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 3 of 31
`
`

`
`90 DAVIES & METZGER
`
`between approximately 1 37° for Fab Newm (4), 1 35° for McPC603 (152),
`
`
`147° for Dob ( 161), and approximately 1700 for Kol ( 106).
`Figure 2 shows the combining site of McPC603 with PC bound. (Y.
`
`
`
`
`Satow, E. A. Padlan, G. H. Cohen, D. R. Davies, manuscript in prepara­
`
`
`
`
`tion). The choline is attached at the bottom of a pocket located principally
`
`
`
`between the hypervariable regions H3 and L3. The phosphate is on the
`
`
`
`surface and contacts residues from the heavy chain. It is apparent that PC
`
`
`
`is a small molecule and that the greater part of the hypervariable surface
`
`
`is not directly in contact with it. At the front of the pocket there are two
`
`
`
`
`
`hydrogen bond donors positioned within reasonable hydrogen bonding dis­
`
`
`
`tance of the phosphate oxygens; these are the hydroxyl group of Tyr 33H
`
`and the guanidinium group of Arg 52H (152). The residues lining the inside
`
`
`of the pocket are Tyr 94L on the right side, Asp 9 1L on the left, Leu 96L
`at the back, (125, 146), and the side chain ofTrp l00aH at the top left. In
`
`
`addition, the backbone ofresidues 92-94L form the lower rim of the front
`of the pocket.
`
`CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE One of the mechanisms proposed for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effector function activation involves an allosteric change upon antigen bind­
`
`
`ing ( 1 10). Since crystals of immunoglobulins have large solvent channels
`
`
`
`
`
`and can bind to haptens soaked in through these channels, crystallographic
`
`
`
`investigation offers a direct way for observing conformational changes,
`when they occur.
`When PC binds to McPC603 in the crystal, no significant conformational
`
`
`
`
`
`change occurs in the protein. There is a small movement ofTrp l 04a away
`
`Figure 2 Stereo drawing of the combining
`site of McPC603 with phosphocholine bound. The
`
`
`
`
`lower residues (91 96 and F32) are from the light chain. The remaining residues belong to
`the three complementarity determining
`
`regions of the heavy chain. The phosphocholine has
`group in front with the choline moiety buried in a pocket.
`the phosphate
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 4 of 31
`
`

`
`ANTIBODY FUNCTION 9 1
`
`from the pocket, but no other change of any significance. However, there
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are several reasons why it cannot be concluded from this observation that
`
`
`
`
`antigen-antibody interaction results in no conformation change:
`
`
`
`
`1. The crystals are grown in a concentrated ammonium sulfate solution,
`
`
`
`
`and it has been observed that in the absence of PC there is a peak at the
`
`
`
`
`phosphate binding site interpreted to be a sulfate ion (126). A conforma­
`
`
`
`
`tional change might have been triggered by the presence of this sulfate ion,
`
`
`
`so that no additional change would be observed upon PC binding. However,
`
`
`in this respect it should be noted that in Fab Newm, (148) no conforma­
`
`
`tional change occurs upon binding of a neutral vitamin Ki derivative.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. PC is small and the association constant ('"105 M i) with McPC603
`
`
`
`might be insufficient to trigger a conformational change that could be
`
`
`
`induced by a larger, more tightly binding antigen. The same consideration
`
`
`applies to Fab Newm.
`
`
`
`known binding specif
`
`
`
`
`might not occur with fragments (81).
`Thus, although there is no support from X-ray diffraction for a conforma­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tional change associated with antigen binding, such a change cannot be
`
`rigorously excluded.
`
`
`
`3. The only two structures at atomic resolution of immunoglobulins with
`
`rule out the possibility that changes that occur with the intact molecule
`
`McPC603; THE CONTACTING RESIDUES AND THE EFFECT OF
`
`
`CHANGES IN THE COMBINING SITE The PC molecule is in direct con­
`
`
`
`
`tact with only a limited number of residues. They include side chains from
`
`
`
`all three heavy chain hypervariable regions and from one (L3) light chain
`
`
`
`
`
`region. The next most distant range of contacts contain many residues that
`
`play a role in positioning the directly contacting residues and changes in
`
`
`
`these might be expected to influence PC binding. An example of such a side
`
`chain is Glu 35H, a residue in the interface between VH and VL that makes
`
`a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl of Tyr 94L, which is in tum a major
`
`
`
`
`
`
`contacting residue with hapten. A mutant ofSI07, a PC-binding myeloma
`
`
`
`
`
`protein, has been observed that has lost the ability to bind PC and also that
`
`
`fails to agglutinate PC-SRBC (144). Amino acid analysis showed that the
`
`
`
`
`
`mutation results in substitution of an alanine for glutamic acid in position
`
`
`
`
`35H. Although a change of this magnitude is likely to produce a significant
`
`
`
`
`rearrangement of side chains in its vicinity simply because of the difference
`
`
`in volume of the two side chains, the loss of contact with Tyr 94L reduces
`
`
`
`
`
`with hapten. contact on a residue in direct an important constraint
`
`
`Another mutant observed by Cook et al (38) is more puzzling. The
`
`mutant still bound PC, but it bound less well than S 107 to PC coupled to
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 5 of 31
`
`

`
`92 DAVIES & METZGER
`
`different carriers, and showed a decrease in affinity for a variety of PC­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`carrier conjugates. The only amino acid change observed was that of Asp
`
`
`
`
`� Ala in the fifth position of the heavy chain J region. Changes in the
`
`
`
`carboxy terminal half of V L were not entirely ruled out, but they did not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`appear in a tryptic peptide analysis. The strange aspect of this mutation site
`
`
`
`is that it is spatially well removed from the PC pocket so that it might not
`
`
`
`
`
`have been expected to be involved in antigen binding. Another curious
`
`
`
`
`feature is that diverse carriers coupled to PC were all affected, which implies
`
`
`
`
`
`they all have some contact with this residue, or with a region influenced
`it.
`
`SEQUENCE COMPARISON OF PC-BINDING ANTIBODIES Sequences
`
`
`
`
`and binding data are available for a variety of PC-binding myeloma proteins
`
`
`
`
`and monoclonal antibodies. They have recently been reviewed by Rudikoff
`
`
`
`(145) and are only discussed here in relation to the three-dimensional
`
`structure of McPC603.
`
`The heavy chain The sequences of 19 heavy chains of BALB/c immuno­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`globulins that bind phosphocholine have been analyzed (74, 145). Ten of
`
`
`
`
`these are identical and employ the T15 sequence. The remaining nine differ
`
`
`
`by one to eight residues from the T15 sequence. Gene isolation and analysis
`
`
`
`have revealed that all 19 of the V H regions must have arisen from the single
`
`
`
`germline T15 VH gene segment (39). M 167 is the most divergent protein
`
`with eight VH substitutions. In both M167 and HPCG1 3 the same change
`
`
`
`
`(Thr at position 40) occurs, but all the other substitutions are unique,
`
`occurring in only one protein.
`The PC-contacting residues Tyr33 and Arg52, together with Glu35, are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`present in all of these sequences. Similarily, all of the BALB/c sequences
`
`
`
`with the single exception of M 1 67 contain a tryptophan
`at lOOb. There is
`
`
`
`
`
`considerable variation in the D region for these proteins, accompanied by
`
`
`
`only relatively small changes in PC affinity, consistent with the fact that,
`
`
`with the exception of TrplOOb, CDR3 of the heavy chain does not playa
`
`major role in defning the PC pocket.
`
`chains The light chains of PC-binding antibodies can be repre­
`
`
`
`The light
`
`
`sented by the three BALB/c myeloma proteins, T15, M603, and M167 (34,
`
`
`
`
`
`35). These light chains differ considerably in sequence, despite the similarity
`
`
`
`
`of their corresponding heavy chain sequences. However, in the PC-binding
`
`
`
`region, in particular with the contacting residues Tyr94, Pr095, and Leu96,
`
`
`their sequences are the same. They also all employ the same h sequence
`(J5).
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 6 of 31
`
`

`
`93
`ANTIBODY FUNCTION
`
`The invariant residues in these light and heavy chains provide strong
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`support for the suggestion that these PC-binding antibodies all have the
`
`
`
`same overall combining site for PC (125), with differences in binding speci­
`
`
`
`ficity being contributed by the amino acid substitutions.
`
`Fab Newm The structure of the Fab of Newm, a human IgG (A) myeloma
`
`
`protein, has been refined to a nominal 2-1 resolution (4, 148). The elbow
`
`
`bend is 137° and the L chain has a seven-residue deletion that includes
`
`residues 55 and 56 of CDR2, and 56 to 62 of the framework region FRIU.
`
`
`
`The combining site is formed by the association of the remaining five
`
`
`hypervariable regions. The principal feature of the site is a shallow groove
`15 X 6 X 6 A deep, bordered by residues
`
`from the Hand L chains. Fab
`
`
`
`Newm binds several haptens at this site with affinity constants ranging from
`
`
`
`
`103 to lOS M I. A derivative of vitamin KI binds with the higher affinity and
`
`
`
`a crystallographic investigation has demonstrated that the menadione ring
`
`
`
`system binds in the shallow groove with the phytyl chain draped along the
`
`
`
`surface, making contact with a number of residues from the light and heavy
`
`
`
`chains (5). The number of contacts provided by the phytyl chain can
`
`
`
`
`
`probably account for the difference in binding between menadione and the
`
`
`vitamin KI derivative (103 vs 1.7 X 105 M l). As noted above, no conforma­
`
`
`tional change is observed upon the hapten binding.
`
`KoL The human IgG A cryoglobulin Kol and its Fab both crystallize and
`
`
`
`
`both structures have been solved, the intact molecule at 3.5 1 and the Fab,
`
`
`at 1 .9 1 resolution
`
`for which the combining site specificity is unknown,
`
`
`(106). The crystals of the intact molecule display an unusual form of disor­
`
`
`
`
`der, described above, that prevents visualization of the Fc.
`
`
`The Fab crystallizes well and has provided a detailed high resolution
`
`structure. The L chain conformation is quite similar to that of Fab Newm,
`
`
`
`except for the presence of the seven additional residues around CDR2.
`
`
`
`
`However, in the H chain, CDR3 is eight residues longer than Newm (and
`
`
`six longer than McPC603), and these additional residues fold into the
`
`combining site and f
`in Newm. This combining site is rich in aromatic side chains, being filled
`
`
`
`
`largely by Trp (47H, 52H, 90L and 108H), Tyr (35H, 35L and 97L), and
`His (59H).
`In both the crystals of the intact molecule and the Fab, the same contact
`
`
`
`
`is made between the hypervariable surface and the hinge segment, Cys221-
`
`Cys230, the light chain C terminus G 1 u212-Ser214, and the residues 1 3 3-
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 7 of 31
`
`

`
`94 DAVIES & METZGER
`
`138 and 196-199 of CH1 of a neighboring molecule. This contact involves
`
`
`considerable surface area and it has been estimated that 1314A2 ofthe Kol
`
`
`
`hypervariable surface is excluded from solvent. The contact is tight and
`
`
`
`
`closely packed and involves hydrophobic interactions as well as salt links
`
`
`and hydrogen bonds. Marquart et al (105) suggest that this interaction
`
`
`
`
`could be a prototype antibody-antigen interaction and might be responsible
`for the cryo properties of this molecule.
`
`ANTIBODY COMBINING SITES Data on antibody combining sites have
`
`
`
`been comprehensively reviewed by Givol (76). Here, we only highlight a few
`
`structural topics.
`What common features, if any, will the three-dimensional structures of
`
`
`
`
`the combining sites share? Givol (76) notes that the sizes of these sites are
`
`
`
`
`
`comparable to those of some enzymes. Lysozyme, for example, has a groove
`
`
`
`
`that will accommodate a hexasaccharide, and this is believed to represent
`
`
`about the upper limit in size for this kind of antigen (88, 102). The binding
`
`
`
`of antidextrans can be divided into two classes: end-binders like W3129,
`
`
`
`
`which bind only the nonreducing end of the dextran; and middle-binders
`
`
`like QUPC52, which bind in the middle of the chain to runs of six glucose
`
`
`
`units. It has been suggested that the former type of antibody might have
`
`
`
`
`a pocketlike site, whereas the latter might be more likely to have a lengthy
`groove (33, 89).
`Since three-dimensional structures are known for but two Fabs with
`
`
`
`
`
`known binding specificities, only a limited picture can be obtained from
`
`
`
`direct observation. It is nevertheless suggestive that one of these structures,
`
`
`McPC603, has a pocket for binding PC, whereas the other, Newm, has a
`
`
`shallow groove where the menadione binding site is located. Again, if we
`
`
`
`were to argue from analogy with enzymes we might expect a pocket or
`
`
`groove in most antibodies to provide specificity. However, specificity can
`
`
`
`
`also be produced by complementarity between two interacting surfaces
`
`
`
`
`without necessarily invoking grooves or pockets, and significant contribu­
`
`
`tions to the free energy of interaction can come from exclusion of hydro­
`
`
`phobic groups from contact with water. This kind of specificity, like the
`
`
`
`t protein, can be quite precise interactions between subunits in a multisubuni
`
`
`
`and can be destroyed by single amino acid changes. For instance, not only
`
`
`
`
`is it necessary to maintain complementarity of two interacting surfaces, but
`
`
`
`there also needs to be a suitable juxtaposition of oppositely charged groups
`
`forming salt bridges as well as appropriate disposition of hydrogen bond
`
`
`
`
`donors and receptors. Accordingly, although antibodies specific for small
`
`
`
`antigenic determinants will probably have a groove or pocket, other anti­
`
`
`
`bodies specific for an array of amino acids such as epitopes on the surface
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 8 of 31
`
`

`
`ANTIBODY FUNCTION 95
`
`of a protein need not necessarily have these features. The Kol protein
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`combining site, although similar in some respects to Newm, has its groove
`
`partially f
`this site interacts strongly with the C-terminal portion of another Fab in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`what could be a prototype antibody/protein antigen complex.
`
`
`
`The availability of monoclonal antibodies to specif
`
`
`
`
`hybridoma technology should provide a significant increase in the diversity
`
`
`
`
`of antibodies studies by X-ray diffraction. In particular, they offer the
`
`
`
`opportunity to study interactions with ligands that are larger than simple
`
`
`
`
`
`haptens and that could completely fll the combining site. One example is
`
`
`
`
`been crystallized an anti-influenza virus neuraminidase that has already
`
`
`
`
`(37). More of these anti-protein antibodies need to be studied, both alone
`
`
`
`
`and complexed with antigen, to obtain structural comparisons with other
`
`
`
`
`studies (12, 57, 164). Other monoclonal antibodies to polysaccharides such
`
`
`
`as 0' 1 � 6 linked dextran should clarify the mechanism of binding for linear
`
`
`
`
`antigens (90) and the effects of amino acid changes on specificity.
`
`MODEL BUILDING STUDIES OF Fv Since in the last 10 years high reso­
`
`
`
`lution structures have been determined for only three different Fab's, and
`
`
`
`only two (M603 and Newm) have known binding specificities, it appears
`
`
`
`that X-ray crystallography can only provide a small fraction of three­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dimensional structures for interesting antibody combining sites. There is
`
`
`
`also the difficulty that only some Fab's can be induced to crystallize. An
`
`
`
`
`alternative approach to direct X-ray analysis is to utilize the knowledge
`
`
`
`available from crystallography together with known amino acid sequences
`
`
`
`to construct models of the Fv's of interesting antibodies. The general prob­
`
`
`
`
`
`lem of protein folding, i.e. how a polypeptide chain several hundred amino
`
`acid residues long folds into its fnal globular form, is being extensively
`
`
`
`
`investigated. However, it is most unlikely that it will soon be possible to
`
`predict correctly the f
`ertheless, the forces that contribute to the stability of a protein continue to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be stu<;lied and are being refined. There is also an increased appreciation of
`
`
`
`
`the dynamic aspects of protein structure.
`The problem of predicting antibody combining site structures is a special
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`case with some features that make it an attractive candidate for investiga­
`
`
`
`tion by molecular modeling. The similarity of variable domain structures
`
`
`
`
`is quite remarkable (4, 120-122), which indicates a strong conservation of
`
`
`
`the three-dimensional structure of the framework part of the variable do­
`
`
`
`mains. Also, the most variable parts of the V domains occur largely at one
`
`
`
`
`
`end of the domain in the hypervariable loops. As a result, a comparison of
`
`
`
`with that of V domains of known structure could, in optimal
`the sequence
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 9 of 31
`
`

`
`96 DAVIES & METZGER
`
`cases, directly lead to a preliminary model that could then be refned by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`suitable energy minimization technique. The problem becomes more com­
`
`
`
`plicated when there are amino acid insertions and deletions that change the
`
`
`
`length of the hypervariable loops. The new loops could be copied wherever
`
`
`
`
`possible from similar size loops in proteins whose structures have been
`The V L : V L dimers Rei and Au (60) provide
`determined.
`
`an example of very
`
`
`
`
`similar three-dimensional structures associated with loops of the same
`
`
`
`
`length, although there are 18 amino acid differences in each domain. A
`
`
`different point of view would be inferred from the L· chain dimer of Mcg
`
`
`
`(58) where corresponding hypervariable loops do not preserve the local
`of the V domains
`
`twofold symmetry
`
`
`but have different conformations as a
`
`
`
`
`result of interaction with neighboring molecules in the crystal.
`
`
`
`
`The earliest modeling studies involved the 2,4-dinitrophenol-binding
`
`
`mouse myeloma protein MOPC315. The combining site of MOPC315 has
`
`
`
`been discussed (135) relative to the structure of Newm. Padlan et al (124)
`
`
`
`constructed a molecular model for MOPC315 that utilizes the framework
`from other V regions
`
`
`stru9ture ofM603 and the hypervariable loops derived
`
`
`
`
`that have CDR's of similar length whose structure had been determined by
`
`
`
`
`
`X-ray diffraction. An extensive nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of
`
`
`MOPC315 (54,55, 186) and its interaction with ligands has led to a refined
`
`
`
`model that is similar to the original model, but has a different orientation
`
`
`
`for the DNP binding site (89). The crystal structure of the Fv ofMOPC315
`
`
`
`is being investigated and should ultimately provide a basis for evaluating
`Davies & Padlan (40) constructed
`these models (6). Subsequently,
`a model
`
`
`
`
`poly­for the homogeneous rabbit antibody (BS5) to type III pneumococcal
`
`
`saccharide. Potter et al (136) presented a model for the inulin-binding
`& Wu (167) have con­
`
`
`
`myeloma protein EPC109. More recently, Stanford
`
`
`
`structed a backbone model for MOPC325, and Feldmann et al (62) have
`
`
`
`
`proposed models for J539 and included a proposal for the binding of hex­
`at 4.5 A
`
`
`
`asaccharide. The crystal structure for J539 has been determined
`
`
`
`and the atomic resolution structure is under investigation so that it should
`
`soon be possible to test this model.
`None of the models described above has been subjected to any form of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`energy minimization. They may give an approximate general, low esolu­
`
`
`
`
`tion picture of the combining sites particularly where they illustrate some
`
`
`
`
`striking insertion or deletion, as in EPC109. However, they are unlikely to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be accurate to better than several angstroms for the backbone atoms, and
`
`
`
`
`could be quite incorrect in positioning the amino acid side chains. Until, for
`
`
`
`at least a few cases, they are compared with the results of X-ray diffraction
`
`
`these models should be regarded as being quite hypothetical and should be
`
`
`
`
`treated with caution. In the case of MOPC315, the structure investigation
`
`
`by Padlan et al (124) was consistent with the known chemical data from
`
`'r
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 10 of 31
`
`

`
`ANTIBODY FUNCTION 97
`
`affinity labeling and did lead to the discovery of an error in the sequence
`
`
`
`
`determination, but these correlations derive from coarse rather than fne
`
`
`
`
`detail in the model. Since single amino acid changes can produce large
`
`
`
`
`effects on structure, it is perhaps optimistic at this stage to expect to define
`
`
`
`
`
`an antibody site with reasonable precision. Certainly, some powerful form
`
`
`of energy minimization will be necessary to ensure that the models pro­
`
`
`
`duced do at least satisfy the basic requirement of stereo-chemistry. How­
`
`
`
`ever, satisfactory prediction also requires a larger library of known
`
`
`
`
`structures of antibodies to a greater variety of antigens.
`
`THE H: L ASSOCIATION For the combinatorial mechanism for generat­
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ing antibody diversity to be reasonably effective, most light chains should
`
`
`
`
`have the ability to combine with most heavy chains. This requirement has
`
`been examined both in vitro and in vivo.
`kinetics (7, 13, The '}'-L interaction has been shown to obey second-order
`
`
`
`22, 69) and has a high affinity with Ka> 1010 M-i (13). When the competi­
`
`
`
`tive association of autologous and heterologous pairs of chains (Le. pairs
`
`
`
`derived or not from the same myeloma) was examined, it was discovered
`
`
`
`that there was a preferred association with the autologous chain (46, 78,
`
`
`associa­104, 170). When heterologous VI( was added to Fd', no significant
`
`tion took place except in the presence of CI(. This was not true for the
`
`
`
`autologous VI(, which did not require the presence of CI( (96). Isolated
`
`
`
`VI( recombined with the autologous V H, but heterologous pairs did not
`of UV difference
`
`associate by the criterion
`
`spectra (80). It is clear that the
`
`
`
`association of the two complete chains must be significantly aided by the
`
`
`
`
`presence of the constr.nt domain of the light chain. Nevertheless, the prefer­
`
`
`
`
`ential association for the autologous pair observed in these in vitro experi­
`
`ments does imply some form of prior selection. Whether or not any
`
`
`
`
`additional selection is needed other than that for antigen binding per se is
`
`
`
`not clear. Clearly, if the VH and VL do not associate at all or associate very
`
`
`
`
`weakly, then their effectiveness in forming a combining site will be greatly
`reduced.
`The source of the variability in the V H : V L association comes from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`involvement of hypervariable residues in the V H : V L interface, as noted
`
`
`previously (41, 42, 148). Figure 3 shows the residues that make contact
`
`
`across the interface between VH and VL in McPC603 (Y. Satow, D.R.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Davies, manuscript in preparation). There are many highly conserved resi­
`
`
`
`dues that interact, particularly those in FRII, such as Glu39. However, at
`
`
`
`one end of the interface a variety of interactions can be seen to occur
`
`
`
`
`hypervariable and framework residues and between pairs of hyper­
`between
`
`
`
`
`variable residues. These must contribute to the forces governing the exact
`
`
`positioning of VL relative to VH. That this is not always the same even in
`
`
`
`related pairs has been demonstrated by Marquart et al (106) for the proteins
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 11 of 31
`
`

`
`98 DAVIES & METZGER
`
`Kol (IgG A) and Newm (IgGI A) where small differences ('"'-'9°) occur in
`
`
`
`the position of V H relative to V L that are outside the limit of experimental
`error.
`
`
`
`In vivo results from cell fusion experiments demonstrated the existence
`of most of the possible "artif
`most, if not all, H and L chain can randomly recombine to produce new
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`immunoglobulins that do not interfere with cell viability (114). This appar­
`
`
`
`
`ent contradiction raises the possibility that the preferential association is an
`
`in vitro artifact, but this would appear to be ruled out by the numerous very
`
`
`
`
`carefully controlled experiments. Alternatively, the difference in the affini­
`
`
`
`
`ties between autologous and heterologous pairs of chains may be so small
`
`
`as to be unobservable under cellular conditions.
`
`When a hybrid H/L recombinant is formed, then there is the additional
`
`
`question of how its binding properties will relate to those of the parent
`
`
`molecules. This would appear to depend on how similar the parent chains
`
`
`
`are, and Sher et al (157) observed that with reconsituted H/L hybrids from
`
`H
`
`035
`
`039
`
`R44
`
`L45
`
`W47
`
`Y91
`
`S99
`
`T100
`
`W100a
`
`Y100b
`
`F100c
`
`W103
`
`A105
`
`L
`
`30K
`
`32F
`
`36Y
`
`380
`
`43P
`
`44P
`
`46L
`
`49Y
`
`87Y
`
`890
`
`910
`
`94Y
`
`95P
`
`96L
`
`98F
`
`99G
`
`100A
`Figure 3 The residues that fonn the interface
`between V H and V L in McPC603. The vertical
`bars indicate
`
`the compiementarity deteng residues. The connecting
`
`lines join those resi­
`of 4 A of one another.
`dues that have atoms within a distance
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit 1058 Page 12 of 31
`
`

`
`ANTIBODY FUNCTION 99
`
`three anti-PC myeloma proteins, those with common idiotypes retained
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`specificity upon recombination, whereas those without common idiotypes
`
`
`did not. Similarily, Manjula et al (103) showed that all the recombinants
`
`
`
`of anti-galactan myeloma proteins they examined showed anti-galactan
`
`
`
`
`
`activity comparable to the parents. However, as reviewed by Rudikoff(145),
`
`
`
`
`these anti-galactan heavy and light chains are so similar to one another that
`
`
`
`
`it is not surprising they exhibit the same binding properties. Recently,
`
`
`
`binding of all the possible Kranz & Voss (97) examined the fluorescein
`
`
`
`
`recombinants from six monoclonal antibodies to fluorescein and found that
`
`
`
`
`no hybrid has anti-fluorescein activity; the sequence and idiotype of these
`
`antibodies was not analyzed.
`
`The Fe
`The human Fc has been crystallized and the structure has been deter­
`
`
`
`
`
`mined at resolution, Figure 4 (43, 44). The structure differs from that
`
`
`
`of a Fab in that there is no protein/protein contact between the two
`
`
`
`
`Instead, the complex carbohydrate attached to Asn297 occu­
`CH2 domains.
`
`
`
`pies the ihterface region between the two domains with weak interactions
`
`
`
`
`
`between the two carbohydrate chains. The two CH3 domains associate in
`
`
`a manner siinilar to the CHI: CL domains of the Fab. The two CH2 domains
`
`
`
`would seem to be positioned

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket