throbber
Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Exhibit 1047 - Page 1
`
`PetitionerAmerigenPharmaceuticalsLtd
`
`1,621.4
`
`$
`
`431.6
`
`$
`
`663.5
`
`$
`
`176.6
`
`1.000
`
`
`
`0.352
`
`
`
`1.000
`
`
`
`0.352
`
`-
`
`
`
`10.5
`
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`10.5
`
`10/31/2008
`
`10/31/2008
`
`10/31/2008
`
`0.924
`
`
`
`0.700
`
`
`
`0.924
`
`
`
`0.700
`
`0.938
`
`
`
`0.938
`
`
`
`0.672
`
`
`
`0.732
`
`
`
`0.732
`
`
`
`0.732
`
`
`
`2,558.0
`
`$
`
`2,558.0
`
`$
`
`1,460.0
`
`$
`
`2008
`
`1998
`
`2008
`
`Total Expected R&D Costs
`
`[G] = 1 / (1 + 10.5%)^[F]. See notes and sources in Exhibit 1045 and Exhibit 1046.
`
`[H] = [A] × [B] × [C] × [D] × [G].
`
`[F] = Date of [E] – (5/12/1998 or 10/31/2008).
`
`[E] FDA Approval Letter, NDA 22-030, 10/31/2008.
`
`[D] = 1 / (CPI for 2013 / CPI for specified year (column)) from Exhibit 1049.
`
`A Double-Blind Phase Folowed by an Open-Label Extension Phase, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00220389?term=fesoterodine&rank=50 (accessed 1/21/2016).
`
`ClinicalTrials.gov, Two Phase Extension Trial of SP668 to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Sustained Release Fesoterodine in Subjects with Overactive Bladder:
`
`Novel Derivatives of 3,3-Diphenylpropylamines, European Patent No. 0,957,073 (filed 5/12/1998, issued 11/17/1999).
`
`The first patent application pertaining to Toviaz was filed in 1998, and Toviaz clinical trials started in June 2003. See:
`
`Grabowski, Henry and Ronald Hansen, "Briefing Cost of Developing a New Drug," Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 11/18/2014, at 18.
`
`The representative development time profile for products in the study is 96.8 months from clinical start to approval, and 128 months from synthesis to approval. See:
`
`[C] Adjustment based on differences between the representative development time profile for products in the study and the development time profile for Toviaz.
`
`Adams, Christopher Paul and Van Vu Brantner (2009), "Spending on New Drug Development," Health Economics 19(2): 130–141, at 140.
`
`I note, however, that Adams and Brantner (2009) state that overall drug development costs for genitourinary drugs "may not be too different form the 'average drug.'" See:
`
`Adams, Christopher P. and Van V. Brantner (2006), "Estimating the Cost of New Drug Development: Is It Really Worth $802 Million?," Health Affairs 25(2): 420–428, at 424, 426.
`
`[B] Adjustment based on cost differences between average drug development and genitourinary drug development in:
`
`Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: The Class of 2008," JAMA Intern Med. 174(1): 90–95, at Table 1.
`
`Moore, Thomas and Curt Furberg (2014), "Development Times, Clinical Testing, Postmarket Follow-up, and Safety Risks for the New Drugs
`
`Toviaz was authorized to test in humans 6.7 years before product approval in October 2008. See:
`
`Estimates based on drugs first tested in humans between 1995 and 2007.
`
`[A] Grabowski, Henry and Ronald Hansen, "Briefing Cost of Developing a New Drug," Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 11/18/2014, at 21.
`
`$
`
`
`
`
`
`10/31/2008
`
`
`
`0.672
`
`
`
`0.732
`
`
`
`1,460.0
`
`$
`
`1998
`
`[H]
`
`[G]
`
`[F]
`
`[E]
`
`[D]
`
`[C]
`
`[B]
`
`[A]
`
`Monetary values are in millions of $U.S.
`
`Notes and sources:
`
`Expected R&D costs
`
`Adjustment for present value
`
`Years from approval
`
`Toviaz approval
`
`Adjustment for inflation
`
`Adjustment for development time profile
`
`Adjustment for genitourinary R&D costs
`
`Published estimate (2013 $)
`
`Expected R&D Costs, Clinical Costs Only
`
`Source
`
`Metric
`
`Estimates of Expected R&D Costs

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket