`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________________________________
`
`
`I.M.L. SLU
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`_______________________________________
`
`Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2016-01656
`U.S. Patent No. 8,122,141
`_______________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF THE
`MODIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO
`SEAL OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER I.M.L. SLU’S REQUEST FOR
`ADVERSE JUDGMENT FOR ABANDONMENT OF THE CONTEST
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(4)
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner, WAG Acquisition,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LLC “WAG”) hereby moves for entry of the Modified Protective Order in the form
`
`annexed to Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Protective Order (Paper 14) and to
`
`seal Patent Owner’s Opposition to Petitioner I.M.L. SLU’s Request for Adverse
`
`Judgment for Abandonment of the Contest Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(B)(4) and
`
`Exhibits 2009, 2010, and 2012 thereto (the “Opposition Filing”), which contain
`
`Petitioner I.M.L. SLU’s confidential business information.
`
`I. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR SEALING CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL
`
`INFORMATION
`
`The Board’s standards for granting motions to seal are discussed in Garmin
`
`International v. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, IPR2012-00001 (Paper 34 at 4-
`
`5) (Mar. 14, 2013). The standard for granting a motion to seal is “good cause.” 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.54(a). The moving party bears the burden of showing that the relief
`
`requested should be granted. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c).
`
`The Opposition Filing contains confidential information requiring that it be
`
`designated as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” under the Modified
`
`Protective Order as it contains information Petitioner I.M.L. SLU has characterized
`
`as highly confidential and that, in particular, discusses and reveals confidential
`
`information regarding “business-sensitive details of the Petitioner’s organizational
`
`structure, business processes, financing, and corporate and legal operations,” as
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described in Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry Of Protective Order. I.M.L.
`
`SLU v. WAG Acquisition, LLC, IPR2016-01656 (Paper 14 at 1) (May 5, 2017).
`
`This information is protectable under the Office Trial and Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012) (stating that the rules identify confidential matter
`
`consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which “provides for
`
`protective orders for trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`
`commercial information”) and should be sealed from the public.
`
`The sealing of the foregoing is of particular importance because Petitioner
`
`I.M.L. SLU claims that it is “a non-public, foreign company, [and] has a strong
`
`interest in maintaining the confidentiality of this information [and that it] will be
`
`prejudiced unduly if it were compelled to produce its private, internal documents
`
`without protection in order to pursue this petition.” I.M.L. SLU v. WAG
`
`Acquisition, LLC, IPR2016-01656 (Paper 14 at 1) (May 5, 2017). Patent Owner
`
`respects Petitioner I.M.L. SLU’s position on this matter.
`
`Conversely, there is no countervailing interest that would counsel against
`
`granting the present motion. Further, granting this motion would not prejudice or
`
`impact this underlying proceeding. The public’s interest in accessing the
`
`information in the Opposition Filing is outweighed by the prejudicial effect and
`
`competitive harm of disclosing the above described confidential business
`
`information.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II. CERTIFICATION OF NON-PUBLICATION
`
`To the best of Patent Owner’s knowledge, and based on statements by
`
`Petitioner I.M.L. SLU about its own information, the confidential information
`
`contained in the Opposition Filing has not been made publicly available.
`
`
`
`III. CERTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE WITH OPPOSING PARTY
`
`AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.54
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.54, counsel for Patent Owner had conferred in
`
`good faith with counsel for Petitioner I.M.L. SLU, and the parties previously
`
`agreed to entry of the modified version of the Board’s Protective Order in the form
`
`annexed to Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Protective Order, Paper 14. The
`
`Opposition Filing is submitted subject to the Modified Protective Order and Patent
`
`Owner moves to file under seal.
`
`
`
`IV. CONCLUSION AND RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Accordingly, good cause exists to warrant entry of the Modified Protective
`
`Order and to seal the Opposition Filing from public disclosure.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Dated: January 5, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Ronald Abramson/
`Ronald Abramson
`(Attorney for Patent Owner)
`Reg. No. 34,762
`212-822-0163
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on January 5,
`
`2018, a complete and entire copy of this Patent Owner’s Motion for Entry of the
`
`Modified Protective Order and to Seal Opposition to Petitioner I.M.L. SLU’s
`
`Request for Adverse Judgment for Abandonment of the Contest Under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.73(b)(4) was provided to Petitioner I.M.L. SLU by filing through the PTAB
`
`E2E System and via email to bjacob@kelleydrye.com, and
`
`syovits@kelleydrye.com, as authorized in Petitioner’s Amended Mandatory
`
`Notices.
`
`
`
` Dated: January 5, 2018
`
`
`
`/Ronald Abramson/
`Ronald Abramson
`(Attorney for Patent Owner)
`Reg. No. 34,762
`
`
`
`
`
`