throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 24
`
`Entered: October 4, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`PANDUIT CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CCS TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases
`IPR2016-01647 (Patent 6,758,600 B2)
` IPR2016-01648 (Patent 6,869,227 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, JENNIFER S. BISK, and DANIEL J. GALLIGAN,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The parties
`may not use this style heading unless authorized.
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00924
`Patent 7,590,550 B2
`
`
`The parties request oral argument for these proceedings pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 22, 23 (in each proceeding). We grant the parties’
`requests. The date for oral argument is November 16, 2017.2
`In each proceeding, Petitioner requests thirty (30) minutes of oral argument
`time. Paper 22, 2. Patent Owner does not request any particular amount of time
`for its argument. See Paper 23. Based on our review of the record in these
`proceedings, we determine that two hours of oral argument time, in total, is
`sufficient to address the issues. Accordingly, each party will have one hour of total
`argument time. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at
`issue in these reviews are unpatentable (see 35 U.S.C. § 316(e)) and will proceed
`first to present its case with regard to the challenged claims on which we instituted
`trial. Thereafter, Patent Owner may respond to Petitioner’s case. After that,
`Petitioner may use any of its remaining time for rebuttal regarding the challenged
`claims.
`Please note the time and location of the hearing. The hearing will
`commence at 1:30 PM Eastern Time, on November 16, 2017, on the ninth floor
`of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and it will
`be open to the public for in-person attendance. Attendees will be accommodated
`on a first-come, first-served basis. If the parties have any concern about disclosing
`confidential information, they are to contact the Board at least 10 days in advance
`of the hearing to discuss the matter. The Board will provide a court reporter for the
`hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the
`
`
`2 In the Scheduling Order, oral argument was set for October 25, 2017. The date
`was changed to November 16 pursuant to a request received by email from Patent
`Owner’s lead counsel, Eric D. Hayes, and pursuant to an agreement of the parties.
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00924
`Patent 7,590,550 B2
`
`hearing. No live testimony from any witness will be taken at the oral argument.
`Any counsel of record may present the party’s argument.
`Any demonstrative exhibits must be served seven business days before the
`hearing. 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). Demonstrative exhibits are not evidence and
`may not introduce new evidence or arguments. Instead, demonstrative exhibits
`should cite to evidence in the record. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical,
`Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan,
`Case No. IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), regarding the
`appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The parties must file any objections
`to the demonstratives with the Board at least two business days before the hearing.
`Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be
`considered waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or less)
`statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further explanation is
`permitted. The Board will consider the objections and schedule a conference if
`deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will reserve ruling on the objections until
`after the oral argument.
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be
`made at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing date. The
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received timely,
`the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing. The parties are
`reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript. The parties
`also should note that one member of the panel will be attending the hearing
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00924
`Patent 7,590,550 B2
`
`electronically from a remote location and that, if a demonstrative is not filed or
`otherwise made fully available or visible to the judge presiding over the hearing
`remotely, that demonstrative will not be considered. If the parties have questions
`as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible and available to
`all of the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board at 571-272-9797.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Kelly J. Eberspecher
`Daniel Cohn
`Nathan P. Sportel
`HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP
`Kelly.Eberspecher@huschblackwell.com
`Dan.Cohn@huschblackwell.com
`Nathan.Sportel@huschblackwell.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Eric D. Hayes
`Eugene Goryunov
`G. William Foster
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`eric.hayes@kirkland.com
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`billy.foster@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket