throbber
ELEV]
`
`international Journal cl‘ Phurmuccuucs 163 (1998) 1l5~l2l
`
`international
`journal of
`_
`
`pharmaceutics
`
`The effect of water—soluble polymers on the aqueous solubility
`and complexing abilities of ,6-cycloclextrin
`
`Thorsteinn Loftsson *, Hafrun Frioriksdottir
`
`Irzsliritw of Pliurnmry. Flmrnaacalugy uml 7'u.rit'alngy. Unmcrsiry of Iceland. P.0. Bot‘ um, IS-I27 Reykjavik, Ice/aml
`
`Received l6 July I993’. received in revised form l6 October I997’; accepted 5 November I997
`
`.....,.l..w».«.-..-‘........iom...t -.a......t....e...c.......»...,.;...v.......~,..........c..
`
`w.............v.,....w.l.......................,.».....w...... w..»~...nnm~+..,..M_.M..~._».m»,M...M.¢...w..._._m.u.......sw. lr
`
`Abstract
`
`The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of both watensoluble polymers and various drugs on the
`solubility of flusyclodextrin (fiCD) in aqueous solution. The solubility of {ICE in water was determined to be 18,6
`mgiml. but addition of 0.25» L00“/’u (wiv) of polyvinylpyrrolidone. and heating in an tlutoclztve 020 140°C for 2040
`min) increased the solubility to 21 mgjml. The aqueous solubility of HCD also increased upon drug»« /1 CD complex
`formation. Both lipopltilic and hydrophilic drugs increased the solubility of /3 CD in water. For example. the solubility
`of /3CD in a saturated aqueous solution of carbamuzepine was determined to be 28.4 mgfml but 53.3 mgiml when
`0.25% (wiv) hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) was present in the solutions. The total solubility of /3 CD in such
`aqueous systems appeared to be the sum of the intrinsic solubility of /3CD and the solubility of the various /)’CD
`complexes, Be. the drugw/lCD complexes and the complexes of [ICD and drug /{CD complexes with the water-sol«
`uble polymers. Not only did the polymer solubilize (5 CD and its complexes. but was also able to enhance drug~ /ICD
`complex Fonnalion.
`1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved,
`
`K't‘j?l\'0rd€I Cyclodcxtrin; Complcxation: Drug delivery: Drug formulations; Polymers; Solubility
` o......t........t..........M.a..»...........,........\...........-.M.-~,.....»..,.....»..~.,,.~._,....“....m._~,,,mw,,.,~...,..,.
`w W-»»«~«»..«..n.;,. /.—.......~..t.,.........».............».....u m.m........a.,.......ut-st
`
`I. Introduction
`
`Cyciodextrins (CDs) are a group of structurally
`related cyclic oligosaccharicles that are formed by
`enzymatic cyclization of starch. The three most
`common naturally occurring CD3 are a:acyclodcx—
`trin (a:CD),
`/Jwyclodcxtrin (/ICD) and y-cy-
`
`‘Correspondtng author. Fax
`thorstlo@lu IS
`
`%354 5254071’.
`
`c»mutlI
`
`clodextrin (*yCD) consisting of six. seven and eight
`(a:~l,4)-linked a-tyglucopyranosc units,
`respec-
`tively. The CD molecules are cont:-shaped with a
`somewhat hydrophobic central cavity and by
`drophilic outer surface They are capable of form«
`ing inclusion complexes with many drugs by
`taking up a whole drug molecule. or more fre-
`quently some hydrophobic part of it,
`into the
`cavity. The complcxation will affect many of the
`physicochcmical properties of the drugs without
`
`0378-5l73»'9li:Sl9.00 O 1998 Elscvter Science B.Vi All rights reserved,
`PH S0378-5173(97)00371-2
`
`APOTEX EX1 044
`
`Page 1
`
`APOTEX EX1044
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`H6
`
`7‘. Luflmin, H. Frioriksrlxltiirz [rm-rnrriiunui Journal of t°imrIml(‘L‘ttIi£.l‘ I63 (I998) H5 ~ [21
`
`affecting their intrinsic lipophilicity or pharmaco-
`logical properties (Frtlmming and Szejtli, 1994;
`Duchéne and Wouessidjcwe, 1996; Loftsson and
`Brewster,
`I996; Rajewski and Stella, 1996;
`Inc
`and Uckama,
`l997).
`The natural CDs, in particular /ICD, have lim-
`ited solubility in water and their complexes with
`lipophilie water-insoluble drugs often result
`in
`precipitation of solid drug- CD complexes (Szejtli,
`i988). Thereforc various CD derivatives possess-
`ing very high solubility in water have been synthe-
`sized. These
`derivatives
`include
`the
`/{CD
`derivatives which presently are the most common
`CD5 used in experimental drug formulations,
`i.e.
`2-hydroxypropyl-/i-cyclodextrin (HP/ICD).
`ran-
`domly methylated
`/I-cyclodextrin,
`sulfobu-
`tylether-/1-cyclodextrin
`and maltosyl—/i-cyclo-
`dextrin. Little attention has been focused on the
`
`usage of third component, such as water-soluble
`polymers,
`to enhance the aqueous solubility of
`/J’ CD and its complexes. The purpose of this study
`was to investigate the effect of water-soluble poly-
`mers on the aqueous solubility and complexing
`abilities of /!CD.
`Polymers are known to interact with CD5, al-
`though the exact nature of the polymer-»CD inter-
`actions is still not known. Hladon and Cwiertinia
`
`/{CD interacts with a
`(1994) have shown that
`number of water-soluble cellulose derivatives.
`
`Other investigators have shown that at low con-
`centrations, polymers
`increase the complexing
`abilities of CD5 (Loftsson ct ah, 1994; Ganzerli et
`al.. 1996) and that
`the polymers enhance the
`availability of drugs in aqueous CD solutions
`(siguroardottir and Loftsson, 1995). This indi-
`cates that these interactions between water-soluble
`
`polymers and CD5 are different from those ob-
`served in, for example, polyrotaxanes where many
`CD molecules are threaded onto a linear polymer
`(sec for example Fujita et al.,
`i996). Such inclu-
`sion complex formation between CD5 and poly-
`mers will reduce the abilities of the CDs to form
`
`complexes with other molecules. Polyrotaxancs
`are prepared at room temperature by gently stir-
`ring an aqueous solution containing both the
`polymer and the CD. Enhancements of the com-
`plexation efficacy and increased drug availability
`in CD solutions are usually obtained by heating
`
`aqueous solutions containing polymer, CD and
`drug in an autoclave (120-l40“C for 20-40 min).
`Simply adding the polymers to the solutions with-
`out heating docs not enhance the complexation or
`the drug availability (Loftsson and Siguréardottir.
`1996).
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1.
`
`IW(IlL'l'lll’.S'
`
`/3-Cyclodextrin (/XCD) was obtained from
`Celedex (Japan), Lhydrexypropyl-[3~cyclodextrin
`MS 0.6 (HP/ICD) and it-cyclodcxtrin ()vC'D) from
`Wacker
`(Germany).
`carboxymethylcellulose
`sodium salt of medium viscosity (CMC)
`from
`Norsk Medisinaldepot (Norway), hydroxypropyl
`methylcellulose
`4000
`(HPMC)
`and
`poly-
`vinylpyrrolidone of molecular weight 40000
`(PVP) from Mecobenzon (Denmark), sodium sali-
`cylate and sulfamethoxazole from Icelandic Phar-
`maceuticals (Iceland), acetazolamide from Agar
`(Italy), earbamazepinc from Aldrich (USA), and
`alprazolam. dexamethasone, econazole. ethoxyzo-
`lamide and methazolamide from Sigma (USA),
`All other chemicals used were of pharmaceutical
`or special analytical grade.
`
`22. Quantitative deternifnation
`
`The quantitative determination of /JCD was
`performed on a high—pcrformance liquid chro-
`matographic (HPLC) system composed of a Wa-
`ters Model 501 pump operated at 1.0 mlfmin flow
`rate, a Rheodyne 7125 injector and PAD-2 pulsed
`amperomctric detector from Dionex (USA) with a
`gold working electrode and a silver-«silver chlo-
`ride reference electrode. The column was a Carbo-
`
`Pae PAI Analytical Column (4 x 250 mm) from
`Dioncx. The cluent consisted of ISO mM sodium
`
`hydroxide and 300 mM sodium acetate in water.
`Duration times for detection were: 15, = 100 mV
`(1.m=l20 ms). E,rm600 mV (:32--"I20 ms) and
`E; m -«~ 800 mV ((3 w 300 ms). The PAD response
`time was set at 1 s. Quantitative determinations of
`the drugs were performed on a reversed-phase
`HPLC component system consisting of a Milton
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`T. Loflsson, Ht Fridriksr/dllirfInternational Jmrrnul of P/mmmcctm'c.t' I63 (£998) H5» 12!
`
`H7
`
`Table 3
`
`Conditions of quantitative drug determination by HPLC
`
`Drug
`
`Mobile phase
`
` ~......«,.u......»y»~».~<.9«m«»\ssm.\.e.ws.».s4«+vw’avw
`
`Flow rate
`(mlfmin)
`
`Wavelength
`(nm)
`
`Retention time
`(mm)
`
`Acctazolumide
`
`Carbamuzepinc
`Hydrocorusone
`Econuzole
`
`Methazolurnide
`-vwwmv?
`
`L5
`
`2.0
`L5
`l 5
`
`Acctomtrile. acetic acid. water ( l0‘2:88) containing
`{).0l5‘?’~. hoctunesulfonute
`Acelonitrile. tetrahydrofurun. wutcr (3S‘| 64)
`Acetomtrile, tetrzlhydrofurun. water (30 l 69)
`Methanol. 0.01 M aqueous potassium phosphate solu«
`lion (pH 4.5) (90:l0)
`254
`2.0
`Aeetonitrile, acetic acid. water ( l2 2 86) containing
`0.0l5‘:»tt (wiv) l-roctanesulforttttt:
`.0.“ M.140%:-v«an>«\¢-p-xv’-‘»....»,,.....,..w...;e...ec....t-..t....i. ....s..............\.........-.ss..
`o-mxu¢vvx‘~1,'»vr\-Mmr-rvvtmvnnaV»~»o>9-ww~om-rvrwmwawov
`
`263
`
`278
`254
`226
`
`4 0
`
`2 8
`2 6
`2.0
`
`2 5
`.............t..................._........u........_.
`
`Roy Constalvletric 3200 solvent delivery system
`(USA), a Spectra Monitor 3200 UV,t"Vis variable-
`wavelength detector, AS-2000A Hitachi Merck
`3200 autosamplcr (Japan-Germany), and El Beck»
`man Ultraspere ODS 5 tr, 4.6 x l50 mm column
`(USA). For other HPLC conditions. see Table l.
`
`3.3. Eva/tralfon of /3’ CD stability during
`cmloclcwing
`
`Stability of the /1CD was determined by heating
`pure unbuffered aqueous IICD (0.5% w;‘v) solu-
`tions, at it pH of about 5, to l20°C in an auto-
`clave (M7 Speed Clove from Midrnark, USA) for
`0 to 80 min (0«~4 heating cycles). The solution was
`heated in closed vials and one vial removed from
`
`the autoclave after each heating cycle. After cool-
`ing the samples to room temperature,
`the /ICD
`concentration was determined by HPLC. The ex-
`periment was repeated two times. No degradation
`of /ICD could be observed in the three indepen-
`dent experiments.
`
`2.4. Solubflity stmiies
`
`An excess amount of /XCD andior the drug to
`be tested was added to water or aqueous polymer
`solution. The suspension formed was heated in an
`autoclave in sealed containers (l20°C for 20 min).
`After equilibration at room temperature (23°C)
`for 4~ 7 days, the suspension was filtered through
`a 0.45-hm membrane filter (Nylon Acrodisc from
`Gelman. USA), diluted with water (when the sol-
`ubility of
`JECD was
`to be determined) or
`
`methanolwwatcr (7:3) solution (when the solubil-
`ity of the drug was to be determined) and the
`/}CD and drug concentrations determined by
`HPLC. The apparent stability constants (Kc) of
`the drugw/ICD (lzl) complexes were determined
`from the phase-solubility diagrams according to
`the method of Higuchi and Connors (i965).
`
`2.5. Diffusion tftrottglz Ce!/opitarze membrane
`
`The effect of heating the polymer /{CD solu-
`tions on the diffusion of M31) through cellophane
`membrane (Spectropore membrane tubing, m.w.
`cut off l2000-~ 14000) was investigated in Franz
`diffusion cells (Vangard, USA). The aqueous so-
`lution to be tested contained l% (wfv) /}CD and
`0.25% (wiv) water-soluble polymer. Half of each
`solution was heated in an autoclave as described
`
`in Section 2.4 (the heating promotes the polymer~-
`/JCD interaction) and the other half was not
`heated {minimal polymers/J CD interaction). Wa-
`ter was used as a receptor phase. Samples (200 pl)
`were withdrawn from the receptor phase every 15
`min for 90 min. The ,{1’CD concentration was
`determined by HPLC. Each experiment was re-
`peated at least three times and the results reported
`are mean values 1 standard error of the mean.
`
`3. Results and discussions
`
`3.]. Polymer» /1 CD interaction
`
`it is possible to enhance aqueous solubility of
`/3CD by forming complexes with water-soluble
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`H8
`
`7‘. Liiflssun. H. Fribrilrsr/élltr Unrernalionrrl Journal of Pizttrtitacciitlcur I63 (I998) H5~»!2l
`
`the
`drugs like sodium salicylate. For example,
`solubility of fi'CD was determined to be l8.6
`mgiml
`in pure water but
`it
`increased to about
`200 mgfml when the solution contained 5% (wt
`v)
`sodium salieylate. The
`apparent
`stability
`constant
`(Ku) of the salicylate~,8CD complex
`was determined from the linear phase-solubility
`diagram to be Si M“ in pure aqueous ,6’CD
`solutions but it
`increased to 64, 87 or 80 M”
`when 0.25% (wiv) CMC, PVP or HPMC,
`rc-
`spectivcly, were added to the solution. How-
`ever.
`solubilization
`of
`/1CD
`through
`complexation with watensoluble drugs
`is of
`limited value to the pharmaceutical
`industry
`The observed enhancement of Kc upon addition
`of the polymers shows that
`the polymers are
`able to interact with the anionic salicylate»
`/ICD complex. The polymers»/ICD interaction
`could also be observed by measuring the flux
`of
`/JCD from aqueous
`polymer
`solutions
`through a semi-permeable membrane which was
`impermeable to the polymers. Thus the fluxes
`of
`/}CD from aqueous PVP solutions were
`56;l:4><l0“‘
`and
`46i4>~.: l0” M min”
`cm” from unheated and heated solutions.
`rev
`
`spcctivcly. From a CMC-montaining solution,
`the fluxes were determined to be
`I003; 18x
`10”’ and 53;t;7x 10*“? M min“ em” from
`an unheated and heated solution,
`respectively.
`This indicates that heating in an autoclave en~
`hanced the polymerw CD interaction resulting in
`slower CD permeability through the membrane.
`Finally,
`the polymer/ICD interaction can be
`observed by measuring the effect of the poly»
`mer on the aqueous solubility of /ICD itself.
`For example, addition of a small amount of
`PVP and heating in an autoclave resulted in
`notable enhancement of the aqueous solubility
`of
`/)’CD (Fig.
`l). The
`solubility
`decreases
`somewhat
`at higher polymer
`concentrations,
`possibly due to formation of water-insoluble
`inclusion complexes between the polymer and
`several
`/ICD molecules. Such precipitates are
`commonly
`observed when
`polyrotaxanes of
`/3CD are formed in aqueous solutions (Fujita
`at £11., 1996).
`
`3.2. Ejfect of Iipop/zilic drugs and polymers on
`the 501ubift'!_tr of /1'CD
`
`In general, lipophilic drugs possess low intrinsic
`aqueous solubility and,
`thus, one would expect
`that addition of such drugs to aqueous /3CD
`solutions should lower
`the solubility of ;b’CD.
`However, the solubility of /iCD in such systems
`should be the sum of the intrinsic solubility of
`/3CD and the solubility of the drug~flCD com
`plex. The solubility of /}CD was determined in
`water and several aqueous polymer solutions and
`the effect of complex formation between drug and
`/JCD on the solubility investigated (Table 2).
`Addition of the polymers results in a 3»«l0‘V.t
`increase in the total aqueous solubility of IICD
`but the drug~fiCD complexation results in a ca
`40% to > l00'i’u increase in solubility (the solubil«
`ity ratio in Table 2 is l.4—-2.l). Further solubiliza-
`tion was obtained when a water-soluble polymer
`was present
`in the aqueous complexation media
`resulting in an additional .'Z~sl00“i»’:t increase in the
`total aqueous solubility of /1CD. The total
`in»
`crease in the /1 CD solubility was in some cases as
`high as 190% (solubility ratio was up to 2"9)X It
`appears that the total solubility of /ICD in such
`aqueous compositions is the sum of the individual
`contributions. For example. the total solubility of
`
`N N
`
`N O
`
`3-4InnoasUsno
`
`
`
`B«Cyclodcxtrlnsolubility(mghnl)
`
`0
`
`5
`4
`3
`2
`1
`PVP concentration (% w/v)
`
`6
`
`l. The effect of increasing PVP concentration on the
`Fig.
`solubility of_,t3’CD in water at room temperature (23"C) The
`mean :3; standard error of the mean of three experiments
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`T. Loflmrn, Ii. Frit’Jn'k.i'¢l:3m‘r.:’lnlcrnutiomI/ Journal of Phc:r:nztc'eml'c.i' I63 (1995) H5 42!
`
`H9
`
`Table 2
`
`The solubility of /ICD in water. in aqueous 0«2S°»"i1(W.’Y) polymer solution, in water saturated with both 19C!) and the drug. or in
`-
`......i........
`cits.»
`aqueous 0.25% (W/Y) polymer solution saturated with both /i'CD and the drug
` ¢..,,...............
`
`Drug (sol. mg/ml)"
`
`Polymer
`
`Solubiiityj: standard deviation (mgfmll
`
`Solubility ratio"
`
`Acetazolumidc
`(0.70)
`
`Alprazolam
`(0.07)
`
`Cttrbamuzcpinc
`(0. l l)
`
`Dcxamcthasonc
`(U l I)
`
`Ethmtyzolamide
`(004)
`
`Mcthazolamide
`(0.05)
`
`~» “
`PVP
`HPMC
`CMC
`
`PVP
`HPMC
`CMC
`
`-
`PVP
`HPMC
`CMC
`
`PVP
`HPMC
`CMC
`
`~~
`PVP
`HPMC
`CMC
`
`-—
`PVP
`HPMC
`CMC
`
`Polymer
`
`18.6 i 0.4
`20.5 :1: 0.8
`20,2 $1.5
`l9.l i 0.!
`
`20.5 i 0.8
`20.2 1 l.S
`l9.| i0.l
`
`18.6 ¢ 0.4
`20.5 3: 0.8
`20.2 3; LS
`19.! $0.!
`
`20.5 ;+_ 0.8
`20.2 i L5
`l9.l 10,!
`
`l8 6 1 0 4
`20.5108
`20.21 |.5
`I91 1- (H
`
`I8 6 1 D 4
`20.5 1; 0.8
`20.2 :1: L5
`l9.li{l,l
`
`Sulfamethoxazole
`(0.36)
`
`l8.6 t 0 4
`-
`20.5 1 0.8
`PVP
`20.2 351.5
`HPMC
`I9 I :0 l
`CMC
`wm WN~
`
`Both polymer and drug
`
`26.01: 0.6
`26.6 3 2.8
`36.8 3‘; 68
`26.8 31.9
`
`24.9 3 0.4
`212 3; (L2
`244};0t4
`
`2841 3; 0.0
`48.4 is 0.1
`53.3 :§- 2.5
`38.25240
`
`24.9 3%; 0.4
`25.2 :1 0.2
`24.4 2 0.4
`
`25.5 3, 3.5
`28.52: 0.5
`350326
`370.: 3.0
`
`360g 0.7
`29.0 '3; 2.2
`323
`3.2
`5l.l:§0.3
`
`38.8 gt; 0.3
`48 0 1?; 2.8
`53.0 3 2.0
`4193.28
`
`L4
`1.4
`2.0
`3.4
`
`1.3
`L4
`L3
`
`1.5
`2.6
`2.9
`2.1
`
`1.3
`1.4
`1.3
`
`L4
`L5
`L9
`2.0
`
`M
`3.6
`l.7
`2.8
`
`2.1
`2.6
`2.9
`2.3
`
`The solubility is the mean of at least three determinations 1 standard deviation,
`“ Solubility (in mgsrnli of the drug In pure water at room temperature.
`" Solubility of /!CD in aqueous solution saturated with both drug and /{CD divided by the intrinsic solubility of [ICU in pure water
`“ No polymer.
`
`flCD in aqueous 0.25% HPMC solution which
`has been saturated with carbamazcpinc was deter-
`mined to be 53.3 mgiml. The individual contribu-
`tions calculated from Table 2 are as follows: (a)
`the intrinsic solubility of {JCD contributes l8.6
`mgfml.
`(b)
`the HPMC~- ,11CD interactions con-
`tribute 1.6 mgiml. (c) the carbamazcpinc-flCD
`interactions contribute 8.2 mgfml. and (d)
`the
`HPMC carbamazcpine « /3 CD interactions con-
`tribute 24.9 mgfml. Only a very small amount of
`HPMC had to be added to the system to obtain
`this solubilizing effect (Fig. 2).
`
`3.3. C0nzple»\’atz'on eflcacy
`
`The polymers increase the aqueous solubility of
`/} CD without decreasing its ability to form inclu~
`sion complexes. Actually, in most cases, the poly»
`mers increase the complexing abilities of /ICD.
`For example, Fig. 3 shows the effect of CMC and
`HPMC concentrations on the carbamazepinc in-
`corporation into /JCD, i.e. how many milligrams
`of carbamazepine forms a complex with one gram
`of /JCD. It can be seen that addition of a small
`amount of the polymers dramatically increases the
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`120
`
`T. Luflsson. H. Frl€lrik.rcIzlm‘r,"Imermnlonui
`
`./oumul of Plmrnmccimn [63 (I998) 11313131
`
`%é A
`
`ceuxohmidc Hemuohmfle Bcunuolo
`
`h %
`*5.
`
`*-J G
`
`9\ O
`
`U‘! 3
`
`It 9
`
`biLicac
`
`
`
`B-Cyclodcxtrinsolubility(mglml)
`
`0
`
`0.1
`
`0.2
`
`0.3
`
`HPMC concentration (‘fa wlv)
`
`use
`
`140
`5
`120
`._—_.
`3 '3 mo
`Ha
`§t2 "
`«-3 so
`Drug
`mi.56
`
`Fig. 2. The effect of HPMC concentration on the solubility of
`/ICD in an aqueous solution which is saturated with both
`/t’CD untl curbamazcpine.
`
`incorporation. Maximum incorporation was
`about
`IOO mg earbamzizepine per gram /}CD.
`which was obtained in 0.075~~0.25% (wfv) HPMC
`solution. HPMC significantly increased the incor-
`poration of acctazolamide into /.?CD but PVP was
`better
`for both mcthazolamide and cconazole
`
`In our study /XCD was a much better
`(Fig. 4).
`complczting agent
`than HP/1CD (Fig. 4). The
`polymers were also able to enhance drug incorpo-
`ration into ;'CD (Fig. 5). Thus, this effect on drug
`incorporation appears to be a general effect of the
`polymers on CD cornplexation. as previously
`shown in the case of HP/1CD (Loftsson et
`‘.11.,
`I994).
`
`Fig. 4. Drug incorporation into HP;?CD and fiCD and the
`effect of addition of 0.25% {aw-v) PVP or HFM-C on drug
`Incorporation into /3CD.
`
`4. Conclusions
`
`The aqueous solubility of/ICD in pure water is
`only l8.6 mg,-‘rnlt However,
`its
`solubility in
`aqueous drug formulations will
`increase signifi»
`cnntly upon formation of inclusion complexes
`with drugs or complex formation with water-solo»
`ble polymers. The polymers not only solubilize
`/1CD and its complexes, but they are also able to
`enhance formation of complexes between drugs
`and /JCDI Thus,
`it should be possible to form
`aqueous drug formulations containing a water-
`soluble polymer and up to 5 or 6% ;9CD in
`solution.
`In such solutions, [fCD could be as
`effective a solubilizer as l0»~15% solution of some
`
`120
`
`200
`
`I-l 6 6
`
`
`
`Incorporation(mglgIl—cyclodextrin)
`
`% 5
`
`v
`__,,.....----- I]
`
`‘BOD
`
`0
`
`0.2
`0.1
`Polymer concentration (% W/V}
`
`0.3
`
`
`Drug
`
`incorporation_(mgdruglgcyciodexlnn)
`
`I-D U! §
`
`u:8QG
`
`Fig‘ 3. The effect of CMC I_§«1.;?) and HPMC (6) concentration
`on carbumazcpinc incorporation into BCD.
`
`Fig. 5. E|Tccl of nddition of 0.25% (wjv) CMC. 0.25% (wiv)
`PVP, or 0.10% wiv HPMC on the incorporation of carbu-
`mnzcpinc and hydrocortlsenc in n lyophiltzed yCD complex.
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`'1'. Lrzflxsan. ll. Fribrikwltirtir International ./uurnul of I’l1arnmcc'm'ic.x' /63 (I998) II5~/ I21
`
`l2i
`
`of the more water-soluble /ICD derivatives. Fl»
`nally. addition of a watcr—solublc polymer could
`also enhance the efficiency of the complexation
`when solid /{CD complex powder is produced by
`kneading or co~grinding at elevated temperatures
`(Loftsson and Brewster, I997}.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`for this investigation from
`Financial support
`the lcclzmdic Research Council
`is gratefully ac-
`knowlcdgeci.
`
`References
`
`Duchénc. D. and Woucssidjcwc. D.. I996. Pharmaceutical and
`medical applications of cyclodcxtrins
`ln‘ Dumltriu. 3.
`(Ed), Polysaccliuridcs In Medical Applications. Marcel
`Dckkcr. New York. pp. 575« 602
`Frfimming, K.-«H. Szcjtli. .l., 1994. CD5 in Pharmacy. Kluwcr
`Academic. Dordrcchl.
`Fujtlu, H... Doya. ‘ii. Kurlstiwu. M.. Mari‘ HV. Tcrano. M..
`Yui. N..
`i996. Thcmlully switchable polyrumxunc as an
`model of stimuliwcsponsivc suprtsmoluculcs for nano-scale
`dcviccs. Mzicromol. Rapid Commun ill, 509515.
`Ganzerli. G‘. van Suntvlict. L.. Vcrschurcn. E., Ludwig. A..
`i996.
`lnllucncc ol” bctwcyclodcxtrin and various polysac-
`
`charides on thc solubility of lluorcsccin and on the rhccr
`logical
`and mucoudhesivc
`properties of ophthalmic
`solutions Phamiuzic 5l. 357m 362,
`Higuchi. ‘P, Connors. K.A., I965. Phase-solubility techniques
`Adv. Anal. Chem. lnstrum. 4.
`ll“?~«l2l.
`Hladon. T,, Cwicrtiniu. 8.. 1994. Physical and chemical intcr»
`1)Cl!DnS between cellulose cthcrs and {J-rcyclodcxlrins. Ph-ur«
`mazic 49, 497~~500.
`l99?. Pharmaceutical applications oi“
`Inc. ‘Ii. Uclcuma. K..
`cyclodcxtrinsz 3. Toxicological issues and safely evaluation
`J. Pharm. Sci. 86* l4‘l~ 162.
`i996. Phztrmuceuticul applica-
`Laflsscm, T.. Brewster. ME.
`llDt'lS of cyclodextrins.
`l. Drug solubilizmion and stubilizu~
`lion. L Pimnn. Sci. 85. l0l7~ l025.
`l.ol'1sson. TV‘ Brewster. M.E., }997A Cyclodcxlrins as phunnw
`cculicul excipicnls. Phamn. Tcclinol. Eur‘ 9 (5). 26~ 34V
`Lofisson. T.. Siguréurdénir. A.M.. I996. Cyclodcxtrins as skin
`pcnclrullon enhancers
`In: S22.-Jtli. 3., Szcntc. L. (Eds).
`Proceedings vi‘ the Eighth international Symposium on
`CD5. Kluwcr Academic. Dordrcchl. pp 509~5l5.
`Loflsscm. 'lI. Friilriksdéttir.
`I-l., Sigutburdénir. A.M.. Ucda.
`H .. l994. The effect of water-soluble polymers on drug~ Cy»
`clodciilrin carnplcxution.
`int. J. Phurmi
`llll.
`l69wlT‘?.
`Rujcwslci, R.A.. Stella, \/..l.. 1996. Pharmaceutical applications
`of cyclodcxlrins. 2. In vivo drug delivery. J. Pharm Sci. 85%
`l!431‘H69V
`
`l995. The effect of
`Siguréurdéttir. A.M.. Loftison. TV,
`polyvinylpyrrolidonc on cyclodcxtrin complcxaiion of hy-
`drocortisonc and its diffusion through hairless mouse skin.
`Int. J. Phurm.
`l.’Z6. ”l’3~78.
`Szcjtli.
`.l..
`l988. CD Technology, Kluwcr Academic. Der»
`drccht. pp 148.
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket