throbber
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`19w ldI
`’
`°'
`
`‘
`'
`0
`1P
`“§.?£f§:12?...1'‘.;‘’.°.2E.’..’g“'‘“‘‘"°’‘
`
`‘
`
`g
`
`,
`
`,
`
`llllllllllllllllIllllllllll||||||lll||||||lllllllllllllllI||||l||||||lI||ll|||||
`
`(43) International Publication Date
`28 December 2000 (28.12.2000)
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`
`(51) International Patent Classification7:
`
`A61P
`
`(74) Agents: RYAN, Patrick M. et al.; R & D Counsel, Q-I48,
`6201 South Freeway, Fort Worth, TX 76134-2099 (US).
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`16 March 2000 (16.03.2000)
`
`(25) Filing Language,
`
`t‘
`26 P bl’
`)
`u lea ion
`
`(
`
`L
`
`anguage
`
`:
`
`English
`
`E 1i h
`ng s
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`60/139,945
`60/158,177
`
`18 June 1999 (18.06.1999)
`7 October 1999 (07.10.1999)
`
`US
`US
`
`(7]) Applicant: ALCON LABORATORIES’ INC‘ [US/US];
`R & D Counsel, Q—l48, 6201 South Freeway, Fort Worth,
`TX 76134-2099 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors: GRAFF, Gustav; 6500 County Road 809, Cle-
`bume, TX 76031 (US). YANNI, John M.; 2821 Donny-
`brook Drive, Burleson, TX 76028 (US).
`
`(81) Designated States (national): AU, CA, JP.
`
`(84) Designated States (regional): European patent (AT, BE,
`
`CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, IE, IT, LU, MC,
`NL, PT, SE).
`
`Published:
`— Without international Search report and to be republished
`upon receipt ofthat report.
`
`For two-letter codes and other abbreviations, refer to the "Guid-
`ance Notes on Codes andAbbreviations " appearing at the begin-
`ning ofeach regular issue ofthe PCT Gazette.
`
`00/78396A2
`
`(54) Title: TOPICAL OPHTHALMIC MAST CELL STABILIZERS FOR TREATING ALLERGIC EYE DISEASES
`
`O (57) Abstract: Topical ophthalmic anti—aJ1ergy drugs are identified by the extent of their interaction with a phospholipid model
`membrane. Disclosed are topically administr-able ophthalmic formulations containing amphipathic anti-allergy compounds at con-
`W
`centrations such that the drugs have Surface Activity Ratings from about 2-11.
`
`APOTEX EX1023
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`TOPICAL OPHTHALMIC MAST CELL STABILIZERS FOR
`
`TREATING ALLERGIC EYE DISEASES
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`10
`
`The present invention relates to topical ophthalmic formulations used
`
`for treating allergic eye diseases, such as allergic conjunctivitis, vernal
`
`conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary conjunctivitis.
`
`More particularly, the present invention relates to therapeutic and prophylactic
`
`topical use of mast cell stabilizers for treating and/or preventing allergic eye
`
`15
`
`diseases.
`
`Description of the Related Art
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Conventional antihistamine drugs are known to exhibit biphasic effects
`
`on mast cells. At lower concentrations, antihistamines promote an inhibition
`
`of histamine release from mast cells. As concentrations of antihistamines are
`
`increased there is a spontaneous release of histamine from mast cells, which
`
`is associated with an apparent loss of mast cell membrane stability. See, for
`
`example, Mota et al., Brit. J. Pharmacol. 15:396-404. This biphasic behavior
`
`has been demonstrated for the anti—allergy drug ketotifen (4,9—dihydro-4-(1-
`
`methyI—4—piperidinyI—idene)- 1 0H—benzo[4,5]cyc/ohepta—[1,2—b]thiophen-1 0-one)
`
`in purified preparations of human conjunctival mast cells.
`
`Yanni et al., J.
`
`Ocular Pharmaco/., 122389-400 (1996).
`
`First generation mast cell stabilizer drugs without antihistaminic activity,
`
`such as cromolyn sodium, also exhibit biphasic behavior.
`
`Johnson et al.,
`
`Monogr. Allergy, 141299-306 (1979).
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`wo 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 4,871,865 and 4,923,892, both assigned to
`
`Burroughs Wellcome Co.
`
`("the Burroughs Wellcome Patents"), describes
`
`certain
`
`carboxylic
`
`acid
`
`derivatives
`
`of
`
`doxepin,
`
`including
`
`11—(3-
`
`5
`
`dimethylaminopropylidene)—6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]oxepine-2-carboxylic acid
`
`and
`
`11—(3—dimethylaminopropylidene)-6,11-dihydrodibenz[b,e]oxepine—2(E)-
`
`acrylic acid, as mast cell stabilizers with antihistaminic action.
`
`These
`
`compounds inhibit the release of autacoids (i.e., histamine, serotonin, and the
`
`like) from mast cells and inhibit directly histamine's effects on target tissues.
`
`10
`
`The Burroughs Wellcome Patents teach various pharmaceutical formulations
`
`containing the carboxylic acid derivatives of doxepin; Example 8 (I) in both of
`
`the patents discloses an ophthalmic solution formulation.
`
`U.S. Patent 5,641,805 discloses topical ophthalmic formulations for
`
`15
`
`treating allergic eye diseases. The topical formulations contain acetic acid
`
`derivatives of doxepin and,
`
`in particular, Z-11-(3—dimethylaminopropylidene)—
`
`6,11—dihydrodibenz[b,ejoxepin-2-acetic acid (i.e., olopatadine), which is the
`
`cis form of the compound having the formula :
`
`CH2CH2N(CH3)2
`
`CHZCOOH
`
`’
`
`O
`
`m
`
`Unlike other antihistamine or mast cell stabilizer anti-allergy drugs,
`
`olopatadine does not provoke a release of histamine from mast cells at
`
`25
`
`concentrations higher than those for which antihistaminic activity is observed.
`
`Other topical ocular anti-allergy drugs that maintain mast cell membrane
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`stability and prevent histamine release from mast cells over a drug
`
`concentration range of 0.01 - 0.5 % (w/v) are desired.
`
`Summam of the Invention
`
`The present invention provides a method for selecting anti—allergy drug
`
`concentrations that are suitable for use in the topical treatment of allergic eye
`
`diseases. According to the present method, an amphipathic anti—allergy
`
`compound’s Surface Activity Rating is determined as described below. For
`
`topically administrable ophthalmic anti—allergy products, the anti-allergy drug
`
`concentration is chosen so that the drug has a Surface Activity Rating (in
`
`units of mN/m) from about 2 — 11.
`
`The present invention is also directed toward topically administrable
`
`ophthalmic
`
`anti-allergy
`
`pharmaceutical
`
`drug
`
`products
`
`comprising
`
`an
`
`amphipathic anti—allergy drug at a concentration such that the drug has a
`
`Surface Activity Rating from about 2 — 11.
`
`Among other factors, the present invention is based on the finding that
`
`amphipathic anti-allergy compounds formulated at concentrations at which
`
`they have a Surface Activity Rating of greater than 11 are likely to cause mast
`
`cell membrane instability and leakage of autocoids, including histamine, from
`
`human conjunctiva! mast cells.
`
`Brief Description of the Drawing
`
`Fig.
`
`1
`
`shows
`
`the
`
`effect
`
`of olopatadine
`
`and
`
`ketotifen
`
`drug
`
`concentrations on the surface pressure of 1-stearoyl-2—o|eoyl-sn-g|ycero-3-
`
`phosphocholine (SOPC) monolayers spread at an initial surface pressure of
`
`30 mN/m.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 4
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/USO0/06890
`
`Detailed Description of the Invention
`
`According to the present invention, topically administrable ophthalmic
`
`anti-allergy pharmaceutical drug products comprise an amphipathic anti-
`
`allergy drug at a concentration such that the drug has a Surface Activity
`
`Rating from about 2 — 11, and preferably from about 4 — 11.
`
`The drug
`
`products of the present invention contain an amphipathic anti-allergy drug at a
`
`concentration of about 20 mM or less.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`The Surface Activity Rating is obtained by determining the interaction
`
`of an amphipathic anti-allergy drug (“test compound”) in buffer alone with a
`
`phospholipid monolayer. Test compound/mast cell membrane interaction is
`
`mimicked in a phospholipid monolayer spread onto an aqueous buffer in a
`
`modified Langmuir
`
`trough.
`
`In
`
`this system,
`
`test compound—membrane
`
`interaction is quantified by determining the change in surface pressure (Arc in
`
`mN/m)
`
`of
`
`a monomolecular
`
`film of
`
`1-stearoyl—2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-
`
`phosphocholine (SOPC) spread at an initial surface pressure of 28 — 32
`
`mN/m on an aqueous buffer sub—phase. The initial surface pressure of 28 —
`
`32 mN/m is chosen because this pressure mimics that of most mammalian
`
`20
`
`cell membranes.
`
`Surface pressure changes are measured at 24°C, while progressively
`
`increasing the concentration of test compound in the buffer sub—phase from O
`
`to at least 5 mM (or to the compound’s solubility limit if less than 5 mM), and
`
`preferably to at least 20 mM (or the compound’s solubility limit if less than 20
`
`mM). Test compound is added to the sub—phase by continuous sub—phase
`
`exchange (keeping the total volume of the sub—phase constant) at a rate slow
`
`enough to avoid disturbing the SOPC monolayer (0.4 ml/min., for example).
`
`Surface pressure is measured using an automated interfacial monitor-
`
`controller built around a Cahn 27 electrobalance equipped with a 24 ga.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`nichrome wire Wilhelmy probe. [See Tsujita et al, Regulation of carboxylester
`
`lipase adsorption to surfaces. 1. Chemical specificity. Biochemistry 2618423-
`
`8429 (1987) and Momsen et al., The suitability of nichrome for measurement
`
`of gas-liquid interfacial tension by the Wilhelmy method. J. Colloid Interface
`
`Sci. 135:547-552 (1990).]
`
`The two aqueous compartments (circular and
`
`rectangular) of the keyhole-shaped Teflon trough are disconnected; only the
`
`circular compartment (area = 25.5 cm2, volume = 24.4 ml)
`
`is used for
`
`monolayer formation. Temperature in both compartments is maintained at 24
`
`°C using a thermostated base plate controlled by a precision water bath.
`
`Precise positioning of the Wilhelmy probe in the aqueous phase, correction
`
`for probe buoyancy due to immersion, sub-phase stirring, and data collection
`
`are controlled by microprocessor (Tsujita et al, id.).
`
`The effect of test compound on surface pressure is determined by a
`
`continuous exchange of the aqueous phase with a concentrated solution of
`
`the test compound in buffer. Although the identity of the buffer is not critical
`
`as long as the aqueous sub-phase is maintained at a physiological pH, the
`
`preferred buffer is 10mM HEPES/100 mM NaCl with the pH adjusted to 7.5.
`
`The concentration of test compound in the aqueous phase is determined from
`
`the fraction of sub-phase volume exchanged and the concentration of the
`
`solute in the concentrated solution. The continuous exchange is necessary to
`
`avoid disturbing the SOPC monolayer, and is accomplished by a side or
`
`bottom injection/withdrawal ports.
`
`The amphipathic anti-allergy drugs of the present invention preferably
`
`possess antihistamine activity, such as tricyclic H1-receptor antagonists
`
`exhibiting an in vitro binding affinity (k;) in the range of 0.1 — 100 nM for the
`
`H1-receptor. The amphipathic anti-allergy drugs of the present
`
`invention
`
`exclude
`
`olopatadine,
`
`ketotifen,
`
`emedastine,
`
`pheniramine,
`
`pyrilamine,
`
`cromolyn, nedocromil and levocabastine.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`Formulations of the anti-allergy compounds for topical ophthalmic
`
`administration can be made using known techniques.
`
`Ophthalmically
`
`acceptable excipients, such as tonicity-adjusting agents, pH—adjusting agents,
`
`buffering
`
`agents, preservatives,
`
`comfort
`
`enhancing agents,
`
`viscosity-
`
`modifying agents, stabilizing agents, etc. may be included.
`
`For example,
`
`sodium chloride, glycerin, mannitol or the like may be used as the isotonic
`
`agent; p—hydroxybenzoic acid ester, benzalkonium chloride or the like as the
`
`preservative;
`
`sodium hydrogenphosphate,
`
`sodium dihydrogenphosphate,
`
`boric acid or the like as the buffering agent; sodium edetate or the like as the
`
`stabilizer; polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyacrylic acid or the like
`
`as the viscous vehicle; and sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid or the like as
`
`the pH controller.
`
`If desired, formulations containing the anti—a|lergy agents
`
`according to the present invention may also contain other active agents.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Eye drop formulations produced according to the present invention will
`
`typically need only be applied to the eyes from once to a few times a day in
`
`an amount of one to several drops at a time, though in more severe cases the
`
`drops may be applied several times a day. A typical drop is about 30 pl.
`
`Certain embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the following
`
`examples.
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`Example 1: Topical Ophthalmic Solution Formulation
`
`Concentration
`
`Ingredient
`(WN%)
`
`Compound having a Surface Activity Rating S 11.2
`at the selected concentration
`
`0.01 — 0.5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Dibasic Sodium Phosphate
`(Anhydrous), USP
`
`Sodium Chloride, USP
`
`Benzalkonium Chloride
`
`Sodium Hydroxide, NF
`7.0
`
`20
`
`Hydrochloric Acid, NF
`7.0
`
`Purified Water
`
`0.5
`
`0.65
`
`0.01
`
`q.s. pH =
`
`q.s. pH =
`
`g.s. 100
`
`Page 8
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`Example 2: Topical Ophthalmic Gel Formulation
`
`5
`
`Ingredient
`
`(WN%)
`
`Concentration
`
`Compound having a Surface Activity Rating S 11.2
`at the selected concentration
`
`0.01 — 0.5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`Carbopol 974 P
`
`Edetate Disodium
`
`Polysorbate 80
`
`0.8
`
`0.01
`
`0.05
`
`Benzalkonium Chloride, Solution
`
`0.01+5 xs
`
`Sodium Hydroxide
`7.2
`
`Hydrochloric acid
`7.2
`
`Purified Water
`
`q.s. pH
`
`q.s. pH
`
`g.s. 100
`
`Example 3: Measurement of the Surface Activity Rating of Olopatadine and
`Ketotifen
`
`Water was purified by reverse osmosis and carbon filtration, passage through
`
`an Elix 3 deionization system (Millipore) and passage through a Milli Q UV
`
`Plus polishing system (Millipore).
`
`Buffer, comprised of 10mM HEPES
`
`containing 0.1M NaCl pH 7.5, was used to prepare solutions of olopatadine
`
`and ketotifen (and for control experiments). After mixing the drug with the
`
`buffer, it was necessary to readjust the pH to a value of 7.5 with 5 M NaOH.
`
`All chemicals were reagent grade.
`
`Page 9
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`Exchange of aqueous phase contents — The circular compartment of the
`
`automated interfacial monitor-controller described above was fitted with an
`
`inlet tube (1/32" ID Teflon) and an outlet tube (18 ga. Teflon) which entered
`
`through the outer wall of the sample compartment. These were connected to
`
`25—mL, gas-tight syringes (model 1025, Hamilton, Reno, NV) mounted in a
`
`microprocessor-controlled push-pull dual syringe pump (model sp260p, World
`
`Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL)
`
`through three-way Teflon valves
`
`(Hamilton, Reno, NV) which were used for filling and flushing. About 42 cm of
`
`the inlet tube was coiled in the water—fi|led rectangular compartment of the
`
`trough in order to equilibrate the incoming solution to the temperature of the
`
`circular compartment. A custom Teflon—coated magnetic stirring bar (length =
`
`3.6 cm, diameter 2 mm) was used to mix the aqueous contents. The bar was
`
`at approximately 50 rpm by stepper motor-driven magnet mounted beneath
`
`the circular compartment and controlled by the microprocessor. The relatively
`
`slow stirring speed and small bar diameter were used to minimize disturbance
`
`of the lipid monolayer. To exchange the contents of the circular compartment
`
`with the solution in the inlet syringe while maintaining constant volume, the
`
`syringes were operated in unison, but in opposite directions, by the syringe
`
`pump.
`
`Control experiments showed that, during exchange of 25 ml of
`
`aqueous phase, the volume of liquid removed from a test container remained
`
`constant to within an average deviation of 0.023 ml (n = 2), or ~ 0.1%. This
`
`insured that the depth of immersion of the Wilhelmy probe was constant to
`
`within ~10 pm and, hence, the contact angle of the aqueous phase with the
`
`probe, remained essentially constant during exchange experiments.
`
`Measurement of oIoQatadine’s and ketot/'fen’s effect on surface QFGSSUI”
`
`-
`
`Saturated solutions of olopatadine and ketotifen, respectively, were prepared
`
`for each exchange experiment by gently warming an excess of drug in buffer,
`
`adjusting the pH to 7.5 and equilibrating the sample to 24° C.
`
`Following
`
`filtration to remove undissolved drug, drug concentration in the solution was
`
`determined spectrophotometrically.
`
`The concentration of drug in diluted
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 10
`
`Page 10
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`aliquots of the solution was determined by comparing their absorbance to a
`
`standard curve obtained with standard solutions of the drug. This solution or
`
`buffer (control) was loaded into the injection syringe of the apparatus and a
`
`monolayer of SOPC was spread onto the surface of the aqueous phase in the
`
`exchange compartment to slightly below the desired surface pressure of
`
`30 mN/m. The lipid film was equilibrated for 90 to 220 min.
`
`in order to
`
`achieve a surface pressure drift rate of <0.01 %/min, which was considered
`
`stable. Once the monolayer was stable, the exchange was carried out at a
`
`constant rate of 0.4 ml/min during which surface pressure was recorded as a
`
`10
`
`function of time.
`
`At
`
`least duplicate exchange and control
`
`(without drug) experiments were
`
`conducted. Each set of controls was normalized to the nominal pressure and
`
`the traces were averaged. The results are shown in Figure 1, where drug
`
`concentration vs. the surface pressure of the SOPC monolayer is plotted for
`
`each drug. Olopatadine caused a relatively small
`
`increase in surface
`
`pressure (7.1 mN/m) as its concentration in the aqueous sub-phase is
`
`increased from O to 5 mM. In contrast, ketotifen produced a two—fold greater
`
`increase in surface pressure (15 mN/m) than olopatadine when tested over a
`
`concentration range of O — 3.5 mM. Thus, the Surface Activity Rating of
`
`15
`
`20
`
`olopatadine is 7.1 and of ketotifen is 15.
`
`10
`
`Page 11
`
`Page 11
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
`
`1.
`
`A method for selecting an amphipathic drug suitable for topical
`
`ophthalmic anti-allergy use comprising the step of determining the drugs
`
`5
`
`Surface Activity Rating.
`
`2.
`
`A
`
`topically
`
`administrable
`
`ophthalmic
`
`pharmaceutical
`
`composition comprising an ophthalmic amphipathic anti-allergy drug at a
`
`concentration such that the drug has a Surface Activity Rating from about 2 —
`
`1o
`
`11, provided the drug is not selected from the group consisting of
`
`olopatadine;
`
`ketotifen;
`
`emedastine; pheniramine;
`
`pyrilamine;
`
`cromolyn;
`
`nedocromil; and levocabastine; and further provided that drug is present at a
`
`concentration of about 20 mM or less.
`
`15
`
`3.
`
`The composition of Claim 2 wherein the drug has a Surface
`
`Activity Rating from 4 — 11.
`
`4.
`
`The composition of Claim 2 wherein the anti-allergy drug is an
`
`antihistamine drug.
`
`11
`
`Page 12
`
`Page 12
`
`

`
`WO 00/78396
`
`PCT/US00/06890
`
`l/l
`
`m:_vEmao_OD
`
`cmEo..mv_O
`
`mVmN
`
`
`
`_>_Edozmbcmocoo9.5
`
`Page 13
`
`_...U_u_
`
`om
`
`[Lu/Nw]
`
`1£‘e.lnSSeJd eoeyng
`
`Page 13

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket