throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Jonathan Baker
`johnflock@andrewskurthkenyon.com; paulqualey@andrewskurthkenyon.com; 2pjl@knobbe.com;
`2dgm@knobbe.com; dburton@burtoniplaw.com; tom@trpatents.com; Michael Saunders; Kim Jackson
`RE: Sony v. One-E-Way, IPR2016-01638 and IPR2016-01639 - Request for Leave to File Opposition to Motions to
`Terminate
`Friday, February 9, 2018 1:52:11 PM
`
`Counsel,

`The request by non-parties Creative Technology Ltd. and Creative Labs, Inc. to file an
`opposition to the Joint Motions to Terminate in IPR2016-01638, 01639 is denied.  35 U.S.C. §
`317(a) provides: “An inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with
`respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner,
`unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination
`is filed. . . . If no petitioner remains in the inter partes review, the Office may terminate the
`review or proceed to a final written decision under section 318(a).”  The panel will consider
`the Joint Motions to Terminate in IPR2016-01638, 01639 in light of 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).  The
`panel does not believe that it is appropriate or necessary for the non-parties to file an
`opposition to the parties’ Joint Motions to Terminate.
`
`Regards,
`Eric W. Hawthorne
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board



`From: Jonathan Baker [mailto:JBaker@farneydaniels.com] 
`Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 12:13 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: johnflock@andrewskurthkenyon.com; paulqualey@andrewskurthkenyon.com;
`2pjl@knobbe.com; 2dgm@knobbe.com; dburton@burtoniplaw.com; tom@trpatents.com; Michael
`Saunders <MSaunders@farneydaniels.com>; Kim Jackson <KJackson@farneydaniels.com>
`Subject: Sony v. One-E-Way, IPR2016-01638 and IPR2016-01639 - Request for Leave to File
`Opposition to Motions to Terminate

`To the Members of The Board:

`Non-parties Creative Technology Ltd and Creative Labs, Inc. (collectively “Creative”) respectfully seek
`leave to file an opposition to the Motions to Terminate jointly filed by the Petitioner and Patent
`Owner in IPR2016-01638 (Paper No. 39) and IPR2016-01639 (Paper No. 36).   In its opposition,
`Creative intends to address the public interest that heavily favors denial of these motions to
`terminate.

`
`

`

`To the extent the Board is considering granting these motions notwithstanding the advanced stage
`of the proceedings, Creative submits that good cause exists to allow Creative to submit a short
`opposition addressing the public interest since the public’s interest is not otherwise represented by
`any of the parties to this proceeding.

`Respectfully,

`Jonathan D. Baker
`Counsel for Non-Parties Creative Technology Ltd and Creative Labs, Inc.


`Jonathan D. Baker
`FARNEY DANIELS PC
`411 Borel Avenue, Suite 310
`San Mateo, CA  94402
`Office:  424-268-5210
`Fax:  512-582-2829
`Email:  jbaker@farneydaniels.com

`                                                                                                                                                                                   
`This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may
`be subject to the attorney-client privilege.  If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to
`this transmission or calling Farney Daniels, P.C. at (512) 582-2828 and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
`read, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any attachments without the author's prior permission. Unless expressly stated in this
`e-mail, nothing in this message should be construed as a digital signature.


`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket