throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571–272–7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: February 1, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ONE-E-WAY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01638
`Patent 9,282,396 B2
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before DAVID C. MCKONE, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`JOHN F. HORVATH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01638
`Patent 9,282,396 B2
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Sony Corporation (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 1, “Pet.”)
`requesting an inter partes review of claims 1–17 of U.S. Patent No.
`9,282,396 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’396 patent”). One-E-Way, Inc. (“Patent
`Owner”) filed a Preliminary Response (Paper 8, “Prelim. Resp.”) to the
`Petition. One of the issues presented in the Petition and the Preliminary
`Response is whether an amendment to an application that adds a statement
`incorporating by reference an earlier application to which priority was
`claimed constitutes improperly adding new matter to the application.
`Pet. 17; Prelim. Resp. 4–14. In addressing this issue, Petitioner cites to the
`Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”) (Pet. 17), and Patent
`Owner cites to several decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for
`the Federal Circuit (Prelim. Resp. 6–11).
`The panel has determined that, in this particular case, it is appropriate
`to authorize Petitioner to file a limited reply to the Preliminary Response.
`Specifically, Petitioner is authorized to file a 7-page reply by February 8,
`2017. The scope of the reply is limited to responding to Patent Owner’s
`argument that certain decisions by the Federal Circuit indicate that the
`prohibition against introducing new matter in a patent application after the
`filing date does not apply in the limited circumstance in which the
`application incorporates material from an earlier application in a chain of co-
`pending applications.
`
`II. ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner may file a 7-page reply according to the
`instructions above by February 8, 2017;
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01638
`Patent 9,282,396 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that no additional evidence may be submitted
`with the reply; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that no additional briefing is authorized at this
`
`time.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`John Flock
`Paul T. Qualey
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`johnflock@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`paulqualey@andrewskurthkenyon.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Megan E. Lyman
`LYMAN PATENT SERVICES
`melyman@lymanpatents.com
`
`Jim Passe
`PASSE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket