Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Education
`Ph.D., Economics, Princeton University
`
`M.A., Economics, Princeton University
`
`B.A., Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, summa cum laude
`
`B.S., Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, summa cum laude
`
`Professional Experience
`Intensity Corporation (www.intensity.com) (formerly Quant Economics). Boston MA: Vice
`President, 2015 to present. San Diego CA: Vice President, 2013 to 2015. Senior Economist,
`2012 to 2013. Economist, 2009 to 2012.
`
`Academic Integrity Seminar (www.integrityseminar.org). Boston MA. Co-Founder and Managing
`Partner, 2006 to present.
`
`JPMorgan Chase & Co. New York NY. Trading Analyst, 2006 to 2007.
`
`Princeton University. Princeton NJ. Economic Research Assistant, 2004 to 2006.
`
`Academic Referee. Review of Economics and Statistics; Journal of Urban Economics;
`Economics of Education Review; Journal of Housing Economics; Journal of Real Estate
`Economics and Finance.
`
`Economic Expertise
`Dr. McDuff frequently provides economic consulting services and expert analysis in a number
`of areas, including:
`
`
`
`Intellectual Property. Dr. McDuff has wide-ranging experience in the economics of
`technology and intellectual property in the life sciences, electronics, and a variety of other
`industries. He has extensive experience evaluating economic issues such as lost profits,
`reasonable royalties, unjust enrichment, irreparable harm, economic prejudice, and
`commercial success. In one example, he evaluated lost profits, reasonable royalties, and
`commercial success relating to an at-risk generic drug launch. In another example, Dr.
`McDuff evaluated reasonable royalties for semiconductor packaging technology, including
`analysis of license agreements, licensing practices, geographic patent coverage, and
`economic bargaining in a hypothetical negotiation.
`
` Financial Analysis. Dr. McDuff provides financial analysis in a variety of contexts,
`including financial modeling, economic forecasting, and strategic business analysis. In
`one example, he constructed discounted cash flow models of a growing business segment
`that had been harmed by alleged unfair competition by a competitor. In another example,
`Dr. McDuff constructed an economic forecasting model in order to project future revenues
`for the purpose of a potential private equity acquisition.
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 2
`
`

`

` Labor & Employment. Dr. McDuff has significant experience in the economics of labor and
`employment. In one example, he provided expert witness testimony relating to employee
`labor income and consumer expenditures in the context of a debtor and trustee in
`bankruptcy court. In another example, Dr. McDuff evaluated the economic impact of an
`employee solicitation between two large insurance companies, using an econometric model
`that accurately separated the effects of the alleged conduct from unrelated factors,
`including the financial crisis in 2008.
`
` Competition. Dr. McDuff performs economic analysis of competition and anti-competitive
`behavior. In one example, he examined allegations of market power and antitrust price
`injury in the flash memory industry, including defining the relevant market and
`determining competitive effects of certain alleged conduct. In another example, Dr.
`McDuff provided expert witness analysis of alleged unfair competition and false advertising
`in the healthcare industry, including analysis of lost profits and unjust enrichment.
`
` Valuation. Dr. McDuff provides expert economic valuation analysis in a wide range of
`contexts and industries. In one example, he provided expert witness analysis and
`testimony relating to a patent portfolio in the telecommunications industry, including
`evaluation of valuation methodologies. In another example, Dr. McDuff provided valuation
`analysis for strategic negotiations for a company attempting to license its technology in the
`computer hardware industry, including evaluation of royalty structures and rates.
`
` Business Optimization. Dr. McDuff designs and implements a variety of data-driven
`methodologies to optimize prices, revenues, and business strategies. In one example, he
`evaluated and designed price optimization algorithms for a high-volume e-commerce client
`with thousands of visitors across hundreds of products daily. In another example, Dr.
`McDuff analyzed and proposed marketing and pricing strategies for an online retailer
`seeking to enhance revenue and profitability heading into the holiday season.
`
`Publications and Papers
`McDuff, DeForest, Ryan Sullivan, and Justin Skinner: “Downgrade to ‘Neutral’: A Diminishing
`Role of the Georgia-Pacific Factors in Reasonable Royalty Analyses,” (2015) les Nouvelles 50(3),
`134-137.
`
`McDuff, DeForest and Ryan Sullivan: “AstraZeneca and Damages In ‘At-Risk’ Generic Drug
`Launches,” April 28, 2015, Law360, http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/642615/astrazeneca-
`and-damages-in-at-risk-generic-drug-launches.
`
`McDuff, DeForest and Justin Skinner: “Reasonable Royalties: All About that Base … Or That
`Rate,” December 18, 2014, Law360, http://www.law360.com/articles/ 603598/reasonable-
`royalties-all-about-that-base-or-that-rate.
`
`McDuff, DeForest, Susan McDuff, Jennifer Farace, Carolyn Kelley, Maria Sovoia, and Jess
`Mandel: “Evaluating a Grading Change at UCSD School of Medicine: Pass/Fail Grading is
`Associated with Decreased Performance on Preclinial Exams but Unchanged Performance on
`USMLE Step 1 Scores” (2014) BioMed Central Medical Education 14:127.
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 3
`
`

`

`McDuff, DeForest and Justin Skinner: “Apple v. Motorola May Help Defenders of Daubert
`Challenges” with Justin Skinner, May 21, 2014, Law360, http://www.law360.com/articles/
`539384/apple-v-motorola-may-help-defenders-of-daubert-challenges.
`
`McDuff, DeForest: “Home Price Risk, Local Market Shocks, and Index Hedging,” (2012) The
`Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 45(1), 212–237.
`
`McDuff, DeForest: “Demand Substitution Across U.S. Cities: Observable Similarity and Home
`Price Correlation,” (2011) Journal of Urban Economics 70(1), 1–14.
`
`McDuff, DeForest: “Quality, Tuition, and Applications to In-State Public Colleges,” (2007)
`Economics of Education Review 26(4), 433–449.
`
`McDuff, DeForest: “Analyzing Income and Happiness: The Effects of Placing Too Much
`Emphasis on Income in a Job” (2005), Princeton manuscript.
`
`Speaking Engagements
`“Damages Whirlwind: Navigating Reasonable Royalties in 2015,” Presenter, Boston Patent Law
`Association, 2015.
`
`“Asset Valuation and Patent Monetization: A Review of Valuation Methods and Transaction
`Structures,” Presenter, Law Seminars International, 2015.
`
`“Jury Trials for At-Risk Generic Launches,” Presenter, Continuing Legal Education, 2015.
`
`“Careers for PhDs in Start-ups,” Panelist, University of California at San Diego, 2014.
`
`“How to Prove Reasonable Royalty in Patent Damages,” Panelist, The Knowledge Congress,
`2013.
`
`“Careers in Economics and Finance,” Presenter, University of California at San Diego, 2010.
`
`“Home Price Risk, Local Market Shocks, and Index Hedging,” Presenter, National Bureau of
`Economic Research, 2008.
`
`Awards
`National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. Awarded to top 25 economics
`graduate students nationwide each year, Princeton University.
`
`Princeton University Graduate Research Fellowship. Full tuition fellowship and stipend for
`graduate research, Princeton University.
`
`Towbes Teaching Prize for Outstanding Teaching. Awarded to top 4 teaching assistants in the
`economics department each semester, Princeton University.
`
`Dillard Prize. Awarded to top undergraduate in economics, University of Maryland.
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 4
`
`

`

`Expert Testimony and Consulting
`Dr. McDuff has been retained as the testifying expert on the following cases:
`
`1. Sanofi and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. Glenmark Generics
`Inc., USA, Glenmark
`Pharmaceuticals Limited, Watson Laboratories Inc., Alkem Laboratories Ltd., First Time US
`Generics LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Alembic
`Pharmaceuticals Limited, and Sandoz Inc. United States District Court, District of
`Delaware, Case No. 1:14-cv-00264. Expert report. Evaluation of commercial success
`related to Multaq (dronedarone) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
`
`2. NCR Corporation v. Documotion Research, Inc. United States District Court, District of
`Delaware, Case No. 1:14-cv-00395. Expert report. Patent infringement damages
`including evaluation of lost profits and reasonable royalty for food and beverage labeling
`products.
`
`3. United Therapeutics Corporation v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. United States District
`Court, District of New Jersey, Case No. 3:14-cv-05498. Retained as expert. Evaluation of
`commercial success related to Remodulin (trepostinil sodium) for the treatment of
`pulmonary arterial hypertension.
`
`4.
`
`In the Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438. United States Patent and
`Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, IPR2016-00286. Expert declaration.
`Evaluation of commercial success related to Zytiga (abiraterone) and the treatment of
`prostate cancer.
`
`5. CH2O, Inc. v. Meras Engineering, Inc., Houweling’s Nurseries Oxnard, Inc., HNL Holdings,
`Ltd., Houweling Utah Operations, Inc., and Houweling’s Nurseries, Ltd. United States
`District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 2:13-cv-08418. Expert report.
`Evaluation of lost profits and reasonable royalty for patent infringement related to
`agricultural technology.
`
`6. TrendSettah USA Inc. and Trend Settah, Inc. v. Swisher International, Inc. United States
`District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 8:14-cv-01664. Expert report,
`declaration and deposition. Antitrust liability and damages, including evaluation of
`market definition, market power, monopolization, and damages related to tobacco
`products.
`
`7. Lights Out Holdings, LLC and Shawne Merriman v. Nike, Inc. United States District Court,
`Southern District of California, Case No. 3:14-cv-00872. Expert report and deposition.
`Evaluation of trademark infringement and false endorsement related to athletic apparel.
`
`8. Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Molecular, Inc. United States
`District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 1:12-cv-00274. Two expert reports.
`Evaluation of economic prejudice and reasonable royalties related to molecular
`diagnostics.
`
`9. AbbVie, Inc. and AbbVie Deutschland GmBH & Co. KG v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
`Mylan Laboratories Ltd. United States District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 1:13-
`cv-01072. Retained as expert. Evaluation of commercial success related to Kaletra
`(lopinavir/ritonavir) and Norvir (ritonavir) for the treatment of HIV / AIDS.
`
`10. Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and Warner Chilcott (US),
`LLC. United States District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 1:13-cv-02088. Expert
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 5
`
`

`

`report, deposition, and trial. Evaluation of commercial success related to NuvaRing
`(estonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol) and contraception products.
`
`11. DNA Genotek, Inc. v. Spectrum DNA, Spectrum Solutions, LLC, and Spectrum Packaging,
`LLC. United States District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 1:15-cv-00661. Expert
`declaration and deposition. Evaluation of economic harm related to genetic testing kits.
`
`12. Eisai Co., Ltd., and Novartis Pharma AG v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Glenmark
`Generics Ltd., Glenmark Generics Inc., USA, Hetero Labs LTD., Hetro USA, Inc., Lupin Ltd.,
`Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Roxane Laboratories, Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware, Case Nos. 13-1279-LPS, 13-1280-LPS,
`13-1281-LPS, 13-1282-LPS, 13-1284-LPS. Expert report and deposition. Evaluation of
`commercial success related to Banzel (rufinamide) for the treatment of epilepsy.
`
`13. Thomas McBurnie, United Green Industries, Inc. d/b/a Custom Coachwerks v. Heartland
`Coalition d/b/a Heartland Foundation, United Green Industries, Inc. d/b/a Custom
`Coachwerks, Alan Caswell, Mark Hanson, and Christopher Kleber. Superior Court of
`California, County of San Diego, Case No. 37-2014-00082263-CU-WT-CTL. Retained at
`expert. Breach of contract and interference with economic relations including analysis of
`business financials and valuations related to custom automobiles.
`
`14. UCB, Inc., UCB Biopharma SPRL, Research Corporation Technologies, Inc., and Harris FRC
`Corporation v. Accord Healthcare,
`Inc.,
`Intas Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Alembic
`Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., Alembic Pharma Limited, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Amneal
`Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.,
`Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., Vennoot Pharmaceuticals,
`LLC, Hetero USA, Inc., Hetero Labs Limited, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan, Inc.,
`Sandoz, Inc., Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Watson
`Laboratories, Inc.-Florida, Watson Pharma, Inc., Actavis, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA),
`Inc., and Cadila Healthcare Ltd. dba Zydus Cadila. United States District Court, District
`of Delaware, Case No. 1:13-cv-01206. Expert report, deposition, and trial. Evaluation of
`commercial success related to Vimpat (lacosamide) for the treatment of epilepsy.
`
`15. Omega Patents, LLC v. CalAmp Corp. United States District Court, Middle District of
`Florida, Case No. 6:13-cv-1950. Expert report and deposition. Patent infringement
`damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty related to vehicle tracker devices on
`automobiles.
`
`16. Tessera, Inc. v. UTAC (Taiwan) Corporation. United States District Court, Northern
`District of California, Case No. 5:10-cv-04435. Expert report, deposition, and
`declaration. Breach of contract damages including lost royalties and prejudgment
`interest related to semiconductor packaging.
`
`17. VStream Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics
`Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., Nokia, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Pantech Wireless, Inc., and ZTE
`(USA), Inc. United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:14-cv-
`00296; and VStream Technologies, LLC v. GoPro, Inc., ION America, LLC, and World Wide
`Licenses, Ltd. United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:14-cv-
`00298. Retained as expert. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of
`reasonable royalty related to optical compression and video decompression.
`
`18. nQueue, Inc. v. Control Systems (USA) Inc.. United States District Court, Central District of
`California, Case No. 8:12-cv-01365-BPO-RNBx. Expert report. Patent infringement
`damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty related to expense tracking systems
`for multi-function copy devices.
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 6
`
`

`

`19. Kevin O’Halloran v. Harris Corporation and RPX Corporation. United States Bankruptcy
`Court, Middle District of Florida, Case No. 8:13-ap-00571. Expert report, deposition
`testimony, and trial testimony. Patent valuation including evaluation of patent portfolios,
`valuation, and valuation context related to telecommunications technologies.
`
`20. UCB, Inc. and UCB Manufacturing, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. United States
`District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Case No. 12-cv-04420-CAP. Two expert
`reports, deposition testimony, and hearing testimony. Patent infringement damages
`including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable royalty, and commercial success related to
`Metadate CD (methylphenidate hydrochloride) for the treatment of ADHD.
`
`21. In re: Victoria J. Wagner. United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of California,
`Case No. 13-06596-MM7. Expert declaration. Labor and employment
`including
`evaluation of analysis of expenditures, living standards, taxation.
`
`22. Invensas Corp. v. Renesas Electronics Corp. United States District Court, District of
`Delaware, Case No. 11-cv-00448-GMS. Expert report. Patent infringement damages
`including evaluation of reasonable royalty related to semiconductor packaging.
`
`23. Motion Water Sports, Inc. v. Square One Distribution, Inc. United States District Court,
`Southern District of California, Case No. 11-cv-01375-CAB. Retained as expert. Patent
`infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable royalty related to
`wakeboard components and products.
`
`24. Avago Technologies U.S. Inc., et al., v. IPTronics, Inc., et al. United States District Court,
`Northern District of California, Case No. 10-02863-EJD. Retained as expert. Patent
`infringement damages and alleged unfair competition including analysis of lost profits,
`unjust enrichment, and reasonable royalty related to lasers and optics products.
`
`25. In re Sanitec Industries, Inc, Debtor; Sanitec Industries, Inc. v. Micro-Waste Corp., et al. and
`related claims. United States District Court, Central District of California, Western
`Division, Case No. 09-cv-03488-PA. Expert report. Economic analysis of competition
`including breach of contract,
`false advertising, unfair competition,
`trademark
`infringement related to hospital microwave disinfection units.
`
`26. Avago Technologies: Avago Technologies, U.S., Inc. and Avago Technologies International
`Sales PTE Limited v. Emcore Corporation and Venture Corporation Limited. United States
`District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:08-cv-03248-JW. Retained as
`expert. Economic analysis of competition including breach of contract, breach of
`warranty, lost profits related to fiber optics transceivers.
`
`27. Aqua-Lung America, Inc. v. American Underwater Products, Inc., d/b/a Oceanic and Two
`Forty Deuce. United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:07-
`cv-02346-RS. Expert report and deposition testimony. Patent infringement and trade
`secret misappropriation including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable royalty, and
`unjust enrichment related to scuba diving equipment.
`
`Dr. McDuff has provided economic consulting services on the following cases:
`
`1. BMG Rights Management (US) LLC, and Round Hill Music LP v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., Cox
`Communications, Inc., and Coxcom, LLC. United States District Court, Eastern District of
`Virginia, Case No. 1:14-cv-01611. Analysis of copyright infringement, including
`evaluation of peer-to-peer file sharing, network effects, and apportionment related to
`alleged pirating of copyrighted works, recordings, and compositions.
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 7
`
`

`

`2. Global Tel*Link Corporation, v. Securus Technologies, Inc. United States District Court,
`Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Case No. 3:14-cv-00829-k. Patent
`infringement damages, including evaluation of lost profits and reasonable royalty related
`to telecommunications provided to correctional facilities.
`
`3. C-Cation Technologies, LLC v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable Enterprises,
`LLC, Time Warner Cable Texas, LLC, Arris Group, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., and Casa
`Systems, Inc. United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:14-cv-
`00059. Patent infringement damages, including evaluation of reasonable royalty related
`to cable telecommunication systems.
`
`4. Farstone, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. United States District Court, Central District of California,
`Case No. 8:13-cv-01537. Patent infringement damages, including evaluation of
`reasonable royalty related to data backup and recovery on computer software.
`
`5. Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation v. Terix Computer Company, Inc.,
`Maintech Incorporated, Volt Delta Resources, LLC, Sevanna Financial, Inc., and West Coast
`Computer Exchange, Inc. and related counterclaims. United States District Court,
`Northern District of California, Case No. 5:13-cv-03385. Antitrust liability and damages,
`including evaluation of market definition, market power, tying, and damages related to
`computer software.
`
`6. Audatex North America, Inc. v. Mitchell International, Inc. United States District Court,
`Southern District of California, Case No. 1:12-cv-01523. Patent infringement damages,
`including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable royalty, and commercial success related to
`the auto insurance estimation and loss valuation.
`
`7. MUSC Foundation for Research Development and Charleston Medical Therapeutics, Inc. v.
`AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. United States District Court, District of South Carolina,
`Case Nos. 2:13-cv-2078 and 2:13-cv-3438. Patent infringement damages, including
`evaluation of reasonable royalty related to Crestor (rosuvastatin) for the treatment of
`cholesterol and inflammation.
`
`8. MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC v. B/E Aerospace, Inc. United States District Court,
`Central District of California, Case No. 2:13-cv-06089. Patent infringement damages
`including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable royalty, and irreparable harm related to
`aircraft vacuum toilet assemblies.
`
`9. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Symantec Corporation.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Case No. 3:13-cv-00808. Patent
`infringement damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty related to computer
`security software.
`
`10. Alfred T. Giuliano, CPM Electronics, Inc., and E.S.E. Electronics, Inc. v. SanDisk
`Corporation. United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 4:10-
`cv-02787-SBA. Antitrust class action including evaluation of market power and antitrust
`price injury related to NAND flash memory.
`
`11. The Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, St. Paul Fire
`and Marine Insurance Company, and The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Pfizer, Inc.
`and Warner-Lambert Company. United States District Court, District of Connecticut,
`Case No. 3:12-cv-01059-VLB. Economic evaluation of anti-competitive conduct and
`unjust enrichment related to Neurontin (gabapentin anhydrous) for the treatment of
`neurological disorders.
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 8
`
`

`

`12. Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. v. Hayward Industries, Inc. and Hayward Pool Products,
`Inc. United States District Court, Central District of California, Case No. 2:11-cv-10280-
`GW. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits and reasonable
`royalty related to pool and spa heaters.
`
`13. Silver State Intellectual Technologies, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA,
`Inc. United States District Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 2:11-cv-01578-PMP.
`Patent infringement damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty and commercial
`success related to personal navigation devices.
`
`14. Medinol Ltd. v. Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson. United States District Court,
`Southern District of New York, Case No. 13-cv-1408 (SAS). Evaluation of economic
`prejudice related to cardiovascular stents.
`
`15. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. and Novartis Pharma AG v. Biogen Idec, Inc. and
`Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. United States District Court, District of Delaware, Case No.
`11-CV-00084 (SLR). Evaluation of economic prejudice related to the diagnosis of
`retroviral infections.
`
`16. Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.; Spansion, LLC; Spansion, Inc.; Spansion
`Technology, Inc.; Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc.; ASE (U.S.), Inc.; ChipMOS
`Technologies, Inc.; ChipMOS U.S.A., Inc.; Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd.;
`Siliconware USA, Inc.; STMicroelectronics N.V.; STMicroelectronics, Inc.; Stats ChipPAC, Inc.;
`Stats ChipPAC (BVI), Ltd.; and Stats ChipPAC, Ltd. Tessera, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.;
`Qualcomm, Inc.; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.; and ATI Technologies, ULC. United States
`District Court, Northern District of California, Case Nos. 4:05-CV-04063 (CW) and 4:12-
`CV-00692 (CW). Patent infringement damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty
`and commercial success related to semiconductor packaging.
`
`17. Applied Micro Circuits Corporation v. SandForce, Inc., Kamran Malik, John Tseng, Michael
`Raam, and LSI Corporation. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa
`Clara, Case No. 1-10-CV-190188. Trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition, and
`labor and employment dispute related to the semiconductor industry.
`
`18. Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation v. TiVo Inc., and related claims.
`United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 5:11-cv-0053. Patent
`infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable royalty, and
`commercial success related to consumer electronics.
`
`19. AdjustaCam LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.; Auditek Corporation; Baltic Latvian Universal
`Electronics, LLC; Best Buy Co., Inc; Best Buy Stores, LP; BestBuy.com, LLC; Blue
`Microphones, LLC; CDW Corporation; CDW, Inc.; CompUSA.com, Inc.; Creative Labs, Inc.;
`Dell, Inc.; Digital Innovations, LLC; Fry's Electronics, Inc.; Gear Head, LLC; Hewlett-Packard
`Company; J & R Electronics, Inc.; Kohl's Corporation; Kohl’s Illinois, Inc.; LifeWorks
`Technology Group, LLC; Macally Peripherals, Inc.; Macally USA; Mace Group, Inc.; Micro
`Electronics, Inc.; New CompUSA Corporation; Newegg, Inc.; Newegg.com, Inc.; Office Depot,
`Inc.; Overstock.com, Inc.; Radioshack Corporation; Rosewill Inc.; Sakar International, Inc.;
`Systemax, Inc.; Target Corp.; Tiger Direct, Inc.; and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. United States
`District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 6:10-cv-00329-LED. Patent
`infringement damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty related to consumer
`electronic products.
`
`20. TiVo Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Corporate
`Resources Group, LLC, Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc., and Verizon Data Services
`LLC. United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:09-cv-00257-
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 9
`
`

`

`JRG. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable
`royalty, and commercial success related to consumer electronics.
`
`21. Finjan, Inc. v. McAfee, Inc., Symantec Corp., Webroot Software, Inc., Websense Inc., and
`Sophos, Inc. United States District Court, District of Delaware, Case No. 10-593-GMS.
`Patent infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits and reasonable royalty
`related to web security software.
`
`22. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. and related counterclaims. United States
`District Court, Northern District of California. Civil Action No. 11-CV-06391-SE.
`Economic evaluation of irreparable harm related to prenatal diagnostic testing.
`
`23. Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Amy F.T. Arnsten, Ph.D., Pasko Rakic, M.D.,
`and Robert D. Hunt, M.D. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical
`Industries, Ltd., Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis, Inc., Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
`Anchen Inc. United States District Court, District of Delaware. Civil Action No. 10-CV-
`0329 (RGA) (consolidated). Patent infringement including evaluation of commercial
`success related to Intuniv (guanfacine) for the treatment of ADHD.
`
`24. CareFusion 303, Inc. v. B. Braun Medical, Inc. United States District Court, Central
`District of California, Case No. SA CV 11-1264 PA (ANx). Patent infringement damages
`including evaluation of lost profits and reasonable royalty related to needle-free connector
`valves for IVs.
`
`25. CooperVision, Inc. v. CIBA Vision Corporation and CIBA Vision AG. American Arbitration
`Association, International Centre for Dispute Resolution, Docket No. 50-122-T-00363-11.
`Economic analysis of breach of contract related to intellectual property relating to
`consumer health products.
`
`26. Altana Pharma AG and Wyeth v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical
`Industries, Ltd.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sun Pharmaceutical Advanced
`Research Center, Ltd., Sun Pharma Global, Inc., and Sun Pharma Global; and Kudco
`Ireland, Ltd., Schwarz Pharma, Inc., and Schwarz Pharma AG. United States District
`Court, District of New Jersey, Consolidated Civil Action Nos. 04-2355 (JLL), 05-1966
`(JLL), 05-3902 (JLL), 06-3672 (JLL), 08-2877 (JLL). Patent infringement damages
`including evaluation of lost profits related to Protonix (pantoprazole) for the treatment of
`gastroesophageal reflux.
`
`27. NuVasive, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc. United States District Court, District of Delaware,
`Case No. 1:10-CV-00849-LPS. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of
`reasonable royalty related to medical devices used in spine surgical procedures.
`
`28. Genentech, Inc. v. The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. United States District
`Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 10-cv-02037-LHK. Patent infringement
`damages including evaluation of reasonable royalty and commercial success related to
`Herceptin (trastuzumab) for the treatment of breast cancer.
`
`29. Wyeth Holdings Corporation, Wyeth-Ayerst Lederle LLC, and Wyeth LLC v. Sandoz Inc.
`United States District Court, District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 09-cv-0955 (LPS).
`Patent infringement including evaluation of commercial success related to Tygacil
`(tigecycline) and treatment of infections.
`
`30. TiVo Inc. v. AT&T Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Video Services,
`Inc., SBC Internet Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Microsoft
`
`CV of DeForest McDuff, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`Petitioner Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited - Exhibit 1034 - Page 10
`
`

`

`Corporation. United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:09-CV-
`0259-DF. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits, reasonable
`royalty, and commercial success related to consumer electronics.
`
`31. Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. United States District Court, District of
`Delaware, C.A. No. 10-cv-00261-GMS. Patent infringement including evaluation of
`commercial success related to Valcyte (valganciclovir hydrochloride) for the treatment of
`cytomegalovirus disease.
`
`32. Hospira, Inc. and Orion Corporation v. Sandoz International GmbH, Sandoz Inc., and
`Sandoz Canada Inc. United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Case No. 3:09-
`cv-04951. Patent infringement including evaluation of commercial success related to
`Precedex (dexmedetomidine hydrochloride) and IV sedation.
`
`33. SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc., Histogen Aesthetics LLC, and Gail Naughton, and related
`claims. United States District Court, Southern District of California, Case No. 09-CV-
`0122. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of lost profits and reasonable
`royalty; trade secret misappropriation; economic evaluation of unfair competition and
`irreparable harm related to consumer health products.
`
`34. ATEN International Co., Ltd., and ATEN Technology, Inc. v. Emine Technology Co., Ltd.,
`Belkin International, Inc., and Belkin, Inc. United States District Court, Central District of
`California, Case No. 8:09-CV-0843. Patent infringement damages including evaluation of
`reasonable royalty related to computer hardware.
`
`35. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Hartford Insurance Company of Illinois, Hartford
`Insurance Company of The Midwest, Trumbull Insurance Company, Hartford Insurance
`Company of the Southeast, Nutmeg Insurance Company, Property and Casualty Insurance
`Company of Hartford, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance
`Company, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters
`Insurance Company, Pacific Insurance Company, Limited, and The Hartford Financial
`Services Group, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Group, Inc., Arch Capital Group Ltd., David M