throbber
NOVEMBER 1, 1993
`
`VOLUME 90
`
`NUMBER 21
`
`N051: Li
`Lil I'.1IA:.,L~;‘
`I
`
`EF-'u.-+"-r?1- o
`
`'H
`
`E F THE
`
`ffoceedings
`National Academy
`of Sciences
`
`OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 8
`
`ILMN EXHIBIT 1036
`
`

`

`Proceedings
`0!‘ THE
`
`National Academy
`of Sciences
`
`OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`Qficer:
`qf the
`Academy
`
`Edfladnl loard
`qfrhe
`Proceedings
`
`BIUCI Mums. Pu-ulna:
`lac: I-l.u.1-ans. Vice Pmidau
`PETE! H. RAVEN. flout Secmwy
`Jau-Ia: B. WYNGA&IDiN. Fania! Sccnswry
`Mlumm 8. Dnssauuwa. fiuauu-r
`
`L.-nwnzucn Boaonn. Cluinmu
`Ina-In E. DARNELL. 1:.
`Elle R. Kama.
`Inc: 1!. Dunn
`-
`Puaur W. Hanna
`llolum L. Guam:
`lihwln D. Snxrnn
`Gannon G. HAIIHEI
`PAUL 2. Sanumn.
`
`_
`Human A. Simon
`Mum: F. Smau
`Invmu L. Wnmum
`Saunas M. Wussu.-uw
`
`Senior Cam-ibufiug
`Bdfwm
`
`Mlcnuu. T. Cuaaa. Jane: E. Duunt, 13.. layman L. Enamel, Roman M. Ewms.
`Buck. KANneI..lucunnA. Lnnln. D1w:D.l.l...LUc:.PaII..W. wanna.
`Auto 0. Katmai. mm D. Sa\I.A‘!'llll. PAlJ‘I. R. scunmat. Anne C. S4-nnuuo.
`Julian. Srunx:a,CB.A.u.asF. S'I'lV1mI-,lI1nnal... WIIIQIAN-.SllaIluIIl. Wniaaum
`
`ConnibuflugEflmn:
`
`.
`
`Il.\xD.CooI-El..HaI.|uN N.£ImnI.W~Iu~.IanuE.PAm.
`
`Couldriugnmers:
`
`Joann L. Gown-rml. Roman Guwul. Jan: I-lam-nu. Janna: stuns
`
`Fnmcu ll. Zwmna
`Managing Editor:
`Senior Associate Editor: Gnu T. COCKS
`Aasociaxczditou-s:
`Cmrnu-n.u.Jo|mM. M:u.1.oY.Mnn.1ml. Ihnan,.IauwrL.MomAu.1'. Punaon,
`Doopnw P. surra. CoLl!.N£llUe|!‘WAl.BlN
`Assiataurflalugina-£‘dltor:.|oAmtnD‘AnI£xJ
`Stdorhudlnlkufifiwt BAIIAII A. Bacon
`
`JAMIE M'L<,PuI. Btu. Focus. Eu.an_0u|..nana. Scott C. Hanan. Ana-Onamas.
`A-oducaionldhonz
`KATHLEEN-RUDY. A)-mu ll. 81-mnnnuum. Don C. Tn-nun!
`MAI! E. IlcLA.Uaa1.n¢
`Praqfi-udrn
`Adllinbkafiw Assirmlu: DILOIII BANxi;'IlnxnA L. Ilcoor
`Hanan-up: Cfobnnmuau-:
`Jaequumn Pan? *
`drruhuou-.
`JULIA Inna. Canrmu llxnuwa
`
`Edna-in! Cacnapandenuz Pnocnnamea or ‘run Hnnomu. Acnnzuv or Sclnucns, 2101 Cunniunion Avenue, Wuh-
`inmon. DC 30418.
`Bnaiutu Correspondence: Circuhtialltlfiee ofthcPIocr.I:mNos. Natiaaalficadumy IIfSciuIDH.11II1CnIutiIIl:'m
`Ave|pIn,W|ulfi@IIn.DCN41I.
`lifiw-nIuflm_hCoIwIbuaar_.I:3eep. l(oflhlsisue)|ndpp.i-viiofIIneN1nn|Ie|'l.JmIu'y1.lQ3.
`Copyright: Vo|Imc9I|.camu1'§ht9l!93bythcNafioadA:ndoa|yof5ciu|I:c|;Vdunul-lloojvylihluaeaflocflvc
`wutuwwihcqyruumh£vHmufidu:mind'hylhmhqs).lowuufiam-mfiumwunhapuud
`in Volume: 1-I9orIhr1q:-ha dthoouflrau Ihoultlbcatldluaeflatheuninuu.-Hiulvfiuma
`afcoulnichniunuuanvafllbbmrepluwbucfiutoulyndnnybcobninad-mm l.IdvuflyIGimflau.Xuox
`Ca1oruin.AmArhu,lfl4llm.1'&hnmflkfinmdunil-fiup|puafl:efiu&V&m'fl.haul.
`Swudpwbm:nmn'emaImweeamu'duifinubfimndnddwHtawdwmeauhflu(Emflmhmum
`man. Subnuipdauanednlionnahuhryuwhdnmnly. Fulfil. u$Imbh'uInIIIn1asfi'.IoIu—ht|BUIi1l¢ShIlu:
`pnnonnl,$23l_);ins_fiIutinunl.flll;ahwhoabymnhoemafl:pcund.I325;huiu§nau.!515;ahowaucbyAiCu3ou
`awxflmp-dSm.l|flrufimnnfiuu&u&-uflpunpmuhmflamhmflaCinhdu~0fiae.&mm-ban
`Ilanwnhd-tomIi!ytIIICit'e1|hI'I::(&eofmePI:3mI3Incn6I¢inadvnaeedInycIn$d'n|Hwas;III9theIncd
`poIIInuI.TheA$enyi:nnt I'oqu&kfwngaeeip!diuuubeeunIlni|wmpe_nd:hnmbuad'nIy;da&hcs
`icon-&.TbnuiaafdIiuIcl—pIbflhnhuIlnIbo|dmduI||l|huu.&|nhI'IqIIwouQaqnuI'flInnt
`bchnaunlmu'ethI.60dayIdhtIlIciuacdIIeioI'domeaticulblabuiantllatnoiclsullhyslflwllcisaledlh
`forfiorehnlaoctbelu.
`.£incbCaplzt:Thtpr;a:afInndonssucu$25.m.
`Iummmmnuu
`muuunpuupguanuup-.nc.-A-uauuuauqau.
`Pnocunnasor1-u)l.mom.|.Acu:euvor ScIBNclIol'fnlUNI1I.D3tA1llmAIIflE:A_(l3SN-U234-I24)i.l
`publisked seanbnamfly by Tun Nanoum. Annex? 91- Samoa. 210! Cannimrbn Aw.-nut. Wadaiuuou. DC2M!8.
`o1993by1‘n:N.naonLAcmauvnrSc1:ucsaorn::Uun:nSn1aanrAunncA.
`
`POSTMASTER: Sendaddresaclungenla: PIOcE£DlN6IOP11l_ENA110NALACADEllYG3C[ENCEIOP1'lllUNI1'£D
`Siam or Auzllca. 2l|31‘Gunditntnan Aw.. Wuhiulun. DC 30418.
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Proceedings
`
`OF THE
`
`National _Academy
`of Sciences
`
`OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`November 1, 1993
`
`Volume 90, Number 21
`
`pp. 9741-40410
`
`Table of Contents
`
`CONDENSED INFORMATION FOR CONTRIBUTORS
`
`AUTHOR INDEX
`I.
`
`Commentary
`
`Nitric oxide: Foe or friend to the injured brain?
`Dennis W. Cltoi
`
`974 1-9743
`
`Papers from a Colloquium
`
`Images of science: Science of images
`A. V. Crew:
`
`Overview of imaging science
`Robert N. Beck
`
`Chargecl—coupled detector sky surveys
`Donald P. Schneider
`
`Pattern recognition at the Fennilah collide: and
`Superconducting Supercollider
`Henry J. Frisch
`
`Model observers for assessment of image quality
`Harrison H. Barrett, lie Yao. Jannick P. Rolland.
`and Kyle J. Myers
`
`9744—9745
`
`9746-9750
`
`9751-9753
`
`9754—9'i‘5'l
`
`9'.'r'58 -9765
`
`Image processing: Some challenging problems
`T. S. Huang and K. Aizawa
`
`Color. contrast sensitivity. and the cone mosaic
`David Williams. Nobutoshi Sekiguehi. and
`David Brainartl
`
`Color appearance: The effects of illumination and
`spatial pattern
`Brian A. Wandell
`
`Nonlinear processes in visual pattern discrimination
`Hugh R. Wilson
`
`The intelligent camera: Images of computer vision
`W. Eric L. Grimson
`
`Shape and motion from image streams: A
`factorization method
`Carlo Tomasi and Talteo Kanade
`
`Issues of imaging science for future consideration
`Robert N. Beck
`
`9766-9769
`
`9770-97 '1'?
`
`9778—9?84
`
`9785-9790
`
`9795-9302
`
`9803 -9807
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 90, pp. 10700-10704. November 1993
`Chemistry
`
`Generation and screening of an oligonucleotide-encoded synthetic
`peptide library
`(encoded synthetic libraries/combinatorial chemistry /peptide diversity}
`
`MICHAEL C. NEEDELS, DAVID G. Jones, EMILY H. Tare, Gneooav L. HEINKEL, LYNN M. Kocneasrenoea,
`WILLIAM J. Dowea, RONALD W. B.-mnerr. AND MARK A. GAr_Lo1=*
`Afiytnax Research Institute, 4001 Miranda Avenue. Palo Alto. CA 94304
`
`Communicated by Peter G. Schultz. August 2. J99}
`
`We have prepared a library of = 10‘ different
`ABSTRACT
`peptide sequences on small, spherical (10-pm diameter) beads
`by the combinatorial chemical coupling of both I.- and D-amino
`acid building blocks. To each head is covalently attached many
`copies of a single peptide sequence and, additionally, copies of
`a unique single-stranded oligonuclaotide that codes for that
`peptide sequence. The oligonucleotide tags are synthesized
`through a parallel combinatorial procedure that effectively
`records the proc by which the encoded peptide sequence is
`assembled. The collection of beads was screened for binding to
`a iluorescently labeled anti-peptide antibody using a fluores-
`cence-activated cell sorting instrument. Those beads to which
`the antibody bound tightly were isolated by fluorescence-
`activatcd sorting, and the oligonncleolide identifiers attached
`to individual sorted beads were amplified by the PCR. Se-
`quences ol' the amplified DNAs were determined to reveal the
`identity of peptide sequences that bound to the antibody with
`high atlinily. By combining the capacity for information stor-
`age in an oiigonucleotlde code with the tremendous level of
`amplification possible through the PCR, we have devised a
`means for specifying the identity of each member of a vast
`library of molecules synthesized from both natural and unnat-
`ural chemical building blocks. In addition, we have shown that
`the use of flow cytometry instrumentation permits facile iso-
`lation of individual beads that bear Itigh-affinity Iigds for
`biological receptors.
`
`Ligands for macromolecular receptors can be identified by
`screening diverse collections of peptides produced through
`either molecular biological or synthetic chemical techniques.
`Recombinant peptide libraries have been generated by in-
`serting dcgcncrate oligonucleotides into genes encoding cap-
`sid proteins of filamentous bacteriophage (1-3) or the DNA-
`binding protein Lac I (4). These random libraries may contain
`>109 different peptides, each fused to a larger protein se-
`quence that
`is physically linked to the genetic material
`encoding it. Chemical approaches to generating peptide li-
`braries arc not limited to combinatorial syntheses usingjust
`the 20 genetically coded amino acids. By expanding the
`building block set to include unnatural amino acids.
`the
`accessible sequence diversity is dramatically increased. In
`several of the strategies described for creating synthetic
`peptide libraries, the different peptides are tethered to a solid
`support in a spatially segregated manner (5, 6). Large librar-
`ies of soluble peptides have been prepared as peptide pools
`using the “tea-bag" method of multiple synthesis. Active
`peptides within these degenerate mixtures are identified
`through an iterative process of screening and sub-iibrary
`resynthcsis (7. 8).
`
`Using the split-synthesis protocol pioneered by Furka er al.
`(9), Lam er al. (10) have prepared libraries containing ===10‘
`peptides attached to 100- to 200-um-diameter resin beads.
`The head library is screened by incubation with a labeled
`receptor: beads binding to the receptor are identified by
`visual inspection and are selected with the aid of a micro-
`manipulator. Each bead contains 50-200 pmoi of a single
`peptide sequence that may be determined directly either by
`Edman degradation or mass spectrometry analysis. In prin-
`ciple. one could create libraries of greater diversity using this
`approach by reducing the bead dimensions. The sensitivity of
`peptide-sequencing techniques is limited to ==l pmol, how-
`ever, clearly limiting the scope of direct peptide-sequencing
`analysis. Moreover. neither analytical method provides for
`straightforward and unambiguous sequence analysis when
`the library building block set is expanded to include 1)- or
`other nonnatural amino acids.
`We recognized that the products of a combinatorial peptide
`synthesis on resin beads could be explicitly specified if it
`were possible to attach an identifier tag to the beads coinci-
`dent with each amino acid-coupling step in the synthesis.
`Each tag would then convey which amino acid monomer was
`coupled in a particular step of the synthesis. and the overall
`sequence of a peptide on any head could be deduced by
`reading the set of tags on that head. We now describe the use
`of single-stranded oligonucleotides to encode a combinatorial
`synthesis on 10-pm-diameter polystyrene beads. Peptides
`and nucleotides are assembled in parallel, alternating syn-
`theses so that each bead bears many copies of both a single
`peptide sequence and a unique oligonucleotide identifier tag.
`We have generated an encoded synthetic library of some 8.2
`X 105 heptapeptides and screened it for binding to an anti-
`dynorphin B monoclonal antibody (mAb) D3139 (4). using a
`fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) instrument to
`select individual beads that strongly bind the antibody.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Reagents and General Methods. The rnonodisperse 10-mo-
`diameter bead material used in this work was a custom-
`synthesized macroporous styrene/divinylbenzene copoly-
`mer functionalized with a 1,12-dianrinododecane linker. All
`protected amino acids were obtained from Bachem.
`Parallel Synthesis of a 69-Base Oligonucleotide and the
`Peptide H-Arg-Gin-Plle-Lys-Val-Val-Tllr-NH; (RQFKVVT).
`The C-terminal seven amino acid fragment of the opioid
`peptide dynor-phin B was synthesized in parallel with a
`69-mer oligodcoxyribonuclcotidc (51708) on 10-,u.m-diameter
`beads. The sequence of ST08 was 5’-AIC BAA 1‘_C_T (2112
`[LAC ATC TCTATA CTA TCA TCA CC [TA TC CT AT TT
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertr'.remem"
`in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1‘!34 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`Abbreviations: Fmoc. 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl; DMT. di-
`rnethoxytrilyl; mAb. monoclonal antibody: FACS, fluorescence-
`activated cell sorting.
`‘To whom reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`10700
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`Chemistry: Needels er al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993)
`
`10701
`
`TT AC] CTC ACI QAC TIC CAI IQC AC-3’. Underlined
`portions of this sequence correspond to PCR-priming sites,
`while the region in italics is homologous to the primer used
`for sequencing this template. The 14-base sequence enclosed
`in brackets represents the coding region of the template.
`The heads were first treated with a mixture of succinitnidyl
`4-O-DMT-oxybutyrate (where DMT is dirnethoxytrity1;Mo-
`lecular Probes) and the Loxybenzotriazole ester of either
`N-Fmoc-2.4-dimethoxy~4'-(carboxyrnethyloxy)benzhydry-
`larnine (i.e.. the acid-cleavable Knorr carboxamide linker,
`where Fmoc is 9-fluorenylrnethoxycarbonyl) or N—Frnoc-
`Thr(:err-butyl)-OH (for noncleavable experiments). The ratio
`of Frnoc-protected atnino groups to DMT-protected hydroxyl
`residues on the beads was determined spectrophotometri-
`cally to be ==20:1. The beads were subjected to 20 cycles of
`oligonucleotide synthesis on an automated synthesizer using
`3'-0—methyl-N,N-diisopropyi phosphoramidites of the fol-
`lowing nucleosides: N5-benzoyl-5'-0-DMT-(7-deaza)-25
`deoxyadenosine (Berry and Associates, Ann Arbor, MI),
`N‘-benzoyi-5’-0-DMT-2’-deoxycytidine, and 5'-O—DMT-
`thymidine (Glen Research. Sterling, VA). The beads were
`then removed from the instrument and treated for 5 min with
`10% (vol/vol) piperidine in dimethylformamide to remove the
`Fmo-C protecting group. After coupling the first amino acid
`residue [N-Fmoc-Thrtrerr-butyl)-OH],
`the beads were
`treated with a tetrahydrofuran solution of acetic anhydride
`and 1-methylimidazole to cap any unreacted amines. All
`peptide coupling reactions were l'l.ll'I for 20 min and contained
`0.11 M Fmoc-amino acid. 0.1 M 0-(benzotriazol-1-yl}
`1.1.3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate. 0.1 M
`1-hydroxybenzotriazole. and 0.3 M diisopropylethylamine in
`dimethylformamide,/CH;Cl;. 1:1. The beads were then sub-
`jected to two cycles of nucleotide addition on the synthesizer
`(detritylation with trichloroacetic acid; tetrazole-catalyzed
`phosphitylation; capping with acetic anhydride: oxidation
`with iodine in acetonitrile/water). Sequential steps of amino
`acid coupling and dinucleotide addition were repeated until
`synthesis of the peptide sequence RQFKVVT and construc-
`tion of the oligonucleotide coding region had been completed.
`After an additional 35 cycles of oligonucleotide synthesis, the
`beads were treated sequentially with piperidine/dimethylfon
`marnide, 1:9 for 3 min; thiophenol/triethylamine/dioxane.
`1:2:2. for 4 hr; ethylenediamine/ethanol, 1:1, for 5 hr at 55°C;
`and trifluoroacetic acid/water, 20:1. for 1 hr to fully depra-
`tect both the peptide and oligonucleotide chains. In experi-
`ments using the acid-cleavable linker, the supernatant from
`the trifiuoroacetic acid de-protection reaction was concen-
`trated in vacuo, and the isolated crude peptide was then
`analyzed by HPLC using a Rainin reverse-phase C15 column.
`Construction ohm Encoded Library. The parallel synthesis
`chemistry outlined above was used in the construction of the
`library. The sites of peptide synthesis were differentiated
`from DNA-synthesis sites in this experiment by coupling to
`all beads a mixture of N-Fmoc-Thr(ter!-butyl)-oxybenzotri
`azole and succinimidyl 4-0-DMT-oxybutyrate, as has been
`described. Sequences of oligonucleotide tags in the library
`deviated from ST08 only within the coding region. The
`3’-conserved region of the oligonucleotide ST08 was first
`synthesized on a total bead mass of 35 ntg (#1335 X 103
`beads). The Fmoc protecting group was removed. and the
`bead mass was divided into seven equal parts. To each
`aliquot was coupled one of seven different a-N-Fmoc-
`protected amino acids [side-chain protecting groups are
`shown in parenthesis): Arg(NG-2,2,5,7,8-pentamethylchro-
`man-6-sulfonyl), Gln(trityl), Phe, Lys(rerr-butoxycarbonyl),
`Val, D-Va]. and Thrtrerr-butyl). Each part was then subjected
`to two rounds of automated oligonucleotide synthesis. The
`respective sequences of the appended dinucleotides that
`specified uniquely each different amino acid residue were
`TA. TC. CT , AT. TT. CA, and AC. The beads were then
`
`pooled and mixed thoroughly; the entire bead mass was then
`subjected to Fmoc deprotection. This cycle of head parti-
`tioning. peptide coupling. oligonucleotide-dirner synthesis,
`bead recombination, and Fmoc removal was repeated for a
`total of seven times. The final Fmoc protecting group was not
`removed. Rather, the pooled bead mass was subjected to 35
`cycles of oligonucieotide synthesis. The library was then fully
`deprotected as described above.
`FACS Analysis of Antibody Binding to Beads. A portion of
`the library (typically 0.5-2 mg of beads) was suspended in
`blocking buffer [phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/1% bovine
`serum albumin/0.05% Tween-20] and incubated at room
`temperature for 1 hr. The beads were pelleted by centrifu-
`gation and resuspended in a solution of mAb D3239 (10
`,ug/ml in blocking buffer) (4). The suspension was incubated
`on ice for 30 min. pelleted by centrifugation. and washed with
`blocking buffer. Beads were then suspended in a solution of
`phycoerythrin-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Molec-
`ular Probes) for 20 min on ice. The beads were washed in
`blocking buffer and diluted in PBS for delivery into the FACS
`instrument (Becton Dickinson FACStar"'"‘). Beads that had
`bound mAb D32.39 were identified by their acquired fluo-
`rescence.
`Individual beads from both the most brightly
`stained 0.17% of the library and from the region having the
`lowest fluorescence (#98%) were sorted into PCR microcen-
`trifuge vials.
`PCR of Bead-Bound Template and Sequencing of PCR
`Product. PCRs consisting of 45 amplification cycles were
`done with Taq polymerase (Perltin—Elmer) according to the
`manufacturer's instructions. The reactions contained dUTP
`and uracil DNA glycosidase (GIBCO/BRL) to prevent car-
`ryover contamination with soluble product from previous
`amplifications (11). Biotinylated PCR product from individ-
`ual reactions was isolated with streptavidin-coated magnetic
`beads (Dynal. Great Neck. NY). After alkaline elution of the
`nonbiotinylated strand and washing, each bead sample was
`treated with sequencing mixture. Dideoxynucleotide se-
`quencing was done by using the primer 5’-ATC TCT ATA
`CTA TCA-3’ (SPl5) and B5: polymerase (Bio-Rad). accord-
`ing to the manufacturer's instructions. except that a 1:100
`ratio of deoxy- to dideoxynucleotide triphosphates (Pharma-
`cia) was used.
`Determination of Peptide-Binding Affinities. Binding affin-
`ities of various peptides for mAb D3239 were measured in a
`competition binding experiment. A tracer peptide (LR-
`RASLGGGRRQFKVVT; 50 pM) containing the known epi-
`tope for mAb D3239 fused to a consensus substrate sequence
`for CAMP-dependent protein kinase was radiolabeled to high
`specific activity with [y-33P]ATP (12) and mixed with various
`concentrations of the peptide of interest (10 ,u.M to 1 pM). The
`peptide mixtures were added to polystyrene wells coated
`with mAb D3239 (0.1 pg/ml). Samples were incubated 2 hr
`at 4°C. the wells were washed with PBS. and the radioactivity
`associated with each well was counted and used to generate
`a competitive binding curve. Under the conditions of the
`assay the lC_=.o should be close to the dissociation constant
`(Kd) for the peptide.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Establishing a practical bead-based oligonucleotide-encoded
`peptide library methodology demands that several key tech-
`nical criteria be met. These criteria include (i) the develop-
`ment of mutually compatible chemistries for parallel assem-
`bly of peptides and oligonucleotides. (ii) the selection of bead
`material with appropriate physical characteristics, (iii) the
`facile isolation of small beads bearing ligands that bind a
`target receptor. and (iv) successful PCR amplification and
`sequencing of template DNA from single beads. We have
`found that the properties of 10-p.n1-diameter beads fashioned
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`10702
`
`Chemistry: Needels er al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 f 1993}
`
`olic ethylenediamine (debenzoylation of protected cytidine
`and 7-deaza-adenine residues). These mild. anhydrous ami-
`nolysis conditions did not adversely affect protected peptide
`sequences (19), which were deblocked using triflnoroacetic
`acid under standard conditions.
`The carboxyl-terminal region of opioid peptide dynorphin
`B (YGGFLRRQFKVVT) has been previously shown to
`represent the epitope of anti-dynorphin B mAb D3239 (4):
`the soluble heptapeptide RQFKVVT binds mAb D3239 with
`high affinity (Kg = 0.5 nM). To test the efficacy of our
`chemical methods. a parallel synthesis of this peptide and a
`69-base oligodeoxyribonucleotide was perfonned on orthog-
`onally differentiated beads bearing an acid-cleavable Fmoc-
`protected carboxamide (Knorr) linker. The beads were ex-
`posed to full oligonucleotide and then peptide-deprotection
`conditions. and the trifluoroacetic acid supernatant contain-
`ing the cleaved peptide was analyzed by reverse-phase
`HPLC. Fig. 1a shows that the crude peptide from the parallel
`synthesis consists of a single major component (coelutirlg
`with authentic RQFKVVT; data not shown) and that this
`crude product is not significantly different from that gener-
`ated in a control peptide synthesis in which no oligonucleo-
`tide chemistry occurred (Fig. lb}. Fig. 2 demonstrates that
`the integrity of the DNA template containing cl dA was also
`maintained through the course of the parallel synthesis chem-
`istry.
`Construction of a Large Encoded Combinatorial Library.
`An encoded library designed to contain 823,543 (77) different
`heptapeptides attached to 10-um beads was constructed by a
`combinatorial synthesis using the seven amino acids arginine,
`glutarnine, phenylalanine, lysine, vaiine, D-valine, and thre-
`onine. a-N-Fmoc-protected threonine and 0-DMT-protected
`y~oxybutyrate residues were first coupled to all the beads to
`provide the orthogonally differentiated amino and hydroxyl
`groups for this synthesis. Starting with a total bead mass of
`35 mg (1.75 X 103 heads) ensured that each peptide sequence
`appeared on e200 different beads in the library. Peptide
`microsequencing analysis of an aliquot of the library con-
`firmed that the seven amino acids were stochastically dis-
`tributed among every position of the degenerate heptapeptide
`mixture (note that L-valine and D-valine are indistinguished in
`the Edman degradation procedure).
`The binding of mAb D3239 to control beads and to the
`bead library was analyzed by flow cytometry. Fig. 3a shows
`that beads carrying the positive control sequence RQFKVVT
`-l
`
`3
`
`30
`
`b
`
`30
`
`'
`
`l
`
`min.
`

`
`0
`
`E 4
`
`0
`
`FIG. 1. ReveI'sed—phase HPLC chromalograms of crude peptide
`RQFKVVT. Asterisks mark peak corresponding to authentic mate-
`rial. (a) Peptide synthesized in parallel with 69~mer oligonueleotide
`ST03. (b) Peptide from control synthesis (no nucleotide chemistry).
`
`from a macroporous styrenefdivinylbenzene copolymer and
`derivatized with a dodecylamine linker are generally satis-
`factory for this work. The amino group loading of these beads
`was estimated to be #100 pmol/g by exhaustive acylation
`with Fmoc-glycine. followed by piperidine cleavage of the
`Fmoc group and spectrophotometric quantitation of the
`released piperidine—dibenzofulvene adduct (em 2 7800
`liter-mol‘1-cm"). With 5 x 109 heads per g. this corresponds
`to a maximum peptide loading of “=20 fmol per bead. Acy-
`lation of the beads with a mixture of an appropriately
`protected amino acid and an to-hydroxy acid provided or-
`thogonally differentiated amino and hydroxyl groups from
`which the peptide and nucleotide chains, respectively. could
`be extended. The average stoichiometry of peptide to olig0-
`nucleotide per bead is controlled by varying the ratio of
`amino and hydroxy acids coupled to the initial bead mass.
`Test peptide syntheses (5-mers to 12-mers) on these beads
`equipped with a trifluoroacetic acid-cleavable Knorr linker
`(13) using standard Fmoc chemistry were found to proceed
`with high fidelity that was indistinguishable from syntheses
`perfonned on conventional peptide synthesis resin. as deter-
`mined by HPLC analysis of the crude cleaved peptide
`carboxamides (data not shown).
`Parallel Synthesis of Peptides and Oligonucleotldes. Parallel
`synthesis strategies require 0‘) the use of a set of protecting
`groups on the amino acids and nucleotide building blocks that
`are mutually orthogonal and (ii) that each of the polymer
`chains be stable to the reagents used in the synthesis and
`deprotection of the second chain. Although. in principle, a
`variety of protection/deprotection schemes could be envis-
`aged, we preferred to use Fmoc/ten-butyl protection on the
`peptide building blocks because of the extensive commercial
`availability of natural and unnatural amino acids protected in
`this manner. However. the ten-butyl-based peptide side-
`chain protecting groups require treatment with strong acid
`(typically trifluoroacetic acid) for removal, conditions that
`lead to rapid depurination of oligonucleotides containing
`either 2'-deoxyadenosine (dA) or 2'-deoxyguanosine (dG)
`(14). This problem has been circumvented by using 7-dea2:a-
`2’-deoxyadenosine (c7dA) for dA in the template oligonucie-
`otide tag. The glycosidic bonds of deazapurine nucleosides
`are resistant to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis (15), and oligonu-
`cleotides incorporating these monomers are faithfully copied
`by thermostable polymerases used in the PCR (16. 17).
`Although not used in this work, acid-resistant guanosine
`analogs could also be incorporated into the template DNA.
`5’-O-dimethoxytrityl 2’-deoxynucleoside 3’-(O—methyl-
`N.N-diisopropyDphosphoramidites were used in all parallel
`syntheses. The reagent (I2/collidine/H30/acetonitrile) used
`to convert the nucleotide phosphite intermediates to phos-
`pholriesters in the DNA-synthesis protocol was not found to
`adversely afiect either the readily oxidized residues try]:-
`tophan and methionine or any of the other protected amino
`acids used in this work (data not shown). Complete removal
`of the 5'—O-DMT group from the growing oligonucleotide
`chain was achieved in ===40 sec using 1% trichloroacetic acid
`in dichloromethane, whereas all of the acid-labile side-chain
`protecting groups used conventionally in Fmoc/ten‘-butyl
`chemistry were inert to treatment with 1% trichloroacetic
`acid for 1 hr. Quantitative deprotection of the cr-amino
`residues required 5- to 10-min treatment with piperidine/
`dimethylformarnide (10% vo1/vol) and also resulted in partial
`demethylation of the protected polynucleotide phosphotri-
`esters (fry: == 45 min). Control experiments indicated that any
`aberrant phosphitylation of the resulting phosphodiester spe-
`cies during subsequent nucleotide chain elongation was re-
`versed by the final oligonucleotide deprotection steps, as
`noted by other workers (18). At the completion of the parallel
`synthesis, the DNA was fully deprotected by treatment with
`thiophenolate (phosphate 0-demethylation) and then ethan-
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`
`
`Chemistry: Needels er al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993)
`
`10703
`
`
`
`Particle Scatter
`
`Particle Scatter
`
`Particle Scatter
`
`3 2
`
`UI
`
`logfluorescence
`
`FIG. 3. Flow cytometric analysis of binding of mAb D3239 to
`10-p-.rn beads beating peptide and oligonueleotide. Approximately 105
`events are recorded in each experiment. Fluorescence intensity is
`shown on vertical axis. (a) A 1:1 mixture of underivatized flower
`population) and RQFKVVT (upper population) beads as negative
`and positive controls.
`(13) Binding of mAb to library. (c) Specific
`binding to library blocked by preincubation of mAb with 10 p.M
`RQFKVVT.
`
`improve the
`and the stringency of wash conditions will
`capacity to isolate only the 1'tighest~afl'mity ligands.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`We have developed chemistry to prepare a highly diverse
`oligonucleotide—encoded synthetic peptide library on micro-
`scopic beads by combinatorial synthesis. While this work
`was in progress, the concept of an oligonucleotide-encoded
`chemical synthesis was proposed independently by Brenner
`and Lerner (20). More recently, two other groups have shown
`that an L-amino acid peptide strand may be used to encode
`the combinatorial assembly of molecular structures that are
`not amenable to direct sequence analysis (21, 22). It seems
`likely that constraints on the sensitivity and throughput ofthe
`Edman procedure will ultimately restrict the scope of this
`peptide-coding approach to analyzing libraries of litnited
`diversity.
`Encoding a combinatorial synthetic procedure with oliga-
`nucleotides provides a mechanism for addressing the major
`limitations of ambiguity and sensitivity encountered in the
`direct structural analysis of minute quantities of ligands
`isolated from large libraries. The high capacity of DNA for
`information storage can be exploited to archive the precise
`details of a library's construction. In the example above, we
`used a "codon" structure of two contiguous nucleotides
`comprising three bases (cl dA, dC, and T), capable of
`encoding a synthesis incorporating up to 32 = 9 amino acid
`building blocks (only seven were used in this library). Ifc7 dG
`were also included in the coding template, then a combina-
`torial synthesis using 1000 different monomers could be
`accommodated by using at ‘‘codon‘‘ size of just 5 nt (45 =
`1024).
`in using an
`A second outstanding advantage inherent
`oligonucleotide-based coding scheme is the ability to achieve
`
`in ACT
`
`3123455
`
`-70 bp
`
`—|nn-lg-I-I-C-I-lb-O-
`
`FIG. 2. Amplification and sequence analysis of oligonucleotide
`STOB synthesized in parallel with peptide RQFKVVT. ta) Ethidium
`bromide-stained agatose gel electrophoresis of products from PCR
`amplifications of 51118 template attached to single sorted beads.
`Lanes: 1 and 6. DNA markers; 2. c"'dA-containing template from
`parallel synthesis; 3, dA-containing template after I-hr treatment
`with 95% trifluoroacetic acid}5% H10; 4. untreated dA-containing
`template; 5, zero bead control.
`(iv) Sequencing gel of the PCR
`amplification product from an individual bead; DNA sequence of the
`template coding region is shown at right.
`
`and a 69-rner oligontlcleotide tag are strongly stained by the
`antibody, whereas blank beads are unstained. By contrast,
`only a small fraction of the encoded library bound with
`D3239 (see Fig. 3b). Analysis of 105 events indicated that
`===2% of the library stained above background levels. Signif-
`icantly, this binding to mAb D3239 was specific for the
`combining site, as it could be completely blocked by prelu-
`cubating the mAb with soluble RQFKVVT peptide (Fig. 3c).
`Individual beads from the library having fluorescence inten-
`sities comparable with the positive control beads were sorted
`into microccntrifuge tubes for tag amplification by PCR
`(beads with fluorescence in the top 0.17% of the population
`were collected). Nucleotide sequences were obtained from 12
`sorted beads, and the deduced peptide sequences are given in
`Table 1. Representative peptide sequences obtained from
`single beads having fluorescence that was not significantly
`above background are also tabulated for comparison.
`These data are consistent with an earlier study showing
`that the preferred recognition sequence of mAb D3239 is
`localized to the six-amino acid fragment RQFKVV of dynor-
`phin B (4). Interestingly, D-valine appears best tolerated at
`positions outside the consensus motif. The range of affinities
`of peptides that were selected (Kg fi= 0.3—1400 nlvl) was not
`unexpected, given the design of the binding assay—i.e.,
`bivalent primary antibody with labeled second antibody
`detection. We anticipate that manipulation of the binding
`valency (for example. directly labeled monovalent receptor)
`Table I.
`
`Amino acid sequences of peptides on beads that bind mAb D3139
`High fluorescence intensity
`Low fluorescence intensity
`Kg. nM
`Sequence
`Sequence
`Kg, mlvi
`0.29
`QQFKVVQ ( T )
`QTVTVKK [ T)
`>1
`4.3
`KQFKVTQI T )
`QQVQRQT ( T )
`>D.4
`8.8
`TQF‘l('v'TK[T)
`KTQvvQF'l '1‘)
`ND
`16
`TFRVFRVI T}
`QVTQVRV { T)
`ND
`76
`FRRQFRVI T )
`F‘lJln'T'JR‘ll'('l')
`ND
`340
`RQFKQVQ ( T J
`
`Sequence
`TFRQFKV l T }
`TTRRFRV l T )
`TVRQFI-('1‘['l')
`QVRQFKT [ T)
`RQFRTVQ I T)
`KQFKVTK ( T)
`
`K4. nM
`370
`410
`5&0
`1400
`ND
`ND
`
`(positive control)
`0.51
`RQFKVVT
`A library of peptide-beating beads was screened for antibody ligands by using an indirect fluores-
`cence assay and FACS instrumentation. Sequences from the highly fluorescent beads are aligned to
`show consensus with the D3239 epitope. Afiinities of selected soluble peptides for mAb D3239 were
`determined by RIA. ND. not determined‘. (Tl. threonine linker residue.
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`10704
`
`Chemistry: Needels er al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (I993)
`
`tremendous levels of target amplification through the PCR.
`We are therefore able to work with tiny quantities of DNA
`template and, hence, to use solid supports of microscopic
`dimensions in our syntheses. This will facilitate the construc-
`tion and screening of libraries that far exceed the diversity
`accessible through other tethered synthetic library tech-
`niques. Moreover, these libraries will employ manageable
`quantities of bead material that can t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket