throbber
Page 1 of 10
`
`ILMN EXHIBIT 1033
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 10
`
`ILMN EXHIBIT 1033
`
`

`
`
`
`TheJournalllofic
`Chemistry
`
`EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
`
`CLAYTON I-I. I-IEATHCOCK
`Department of Chemistry
`University of California
`Berkeley, California 94720
`
`SENIOR ITORS
`Peter Beak
`University of Illinois. Urbano
`Robert M. Coates
`University of Illinois. Urbano
`C. Dale Poulter
`University of Utah
`Henry Rapoport
`University of California, Berkeley
`Andrew Streitwieser
`University of California. Berkeley
`Steven M. Weinreb
`The Pennsylvania State University
`
`ASSISTANT EDITOR
`
`Cheri R. Hadley
`
`ADVISORY BOARD
`
`Paul A. Aristoff
`David E. Bergbreiter
`Barry Carpenter
`Rick L. Danheiser
`Roger Freidinger
`Bruce Ganem
`Robert H. Grubbs
`Alfred Hsesner
`Kendall N. Houlr
`David Lynn
`Frank B. Mallory
`Albert I. Meyers
`Marvin J. Miller
`John J. Partridge
`Matthew Plstz
`Kenneth L. Rinehart
`Stuart Schreiber
`David I. Schustnr
`Ichiro Shinksi
`Charles Starla:
`W. Clark Still
`JoAnne Stubbo
`Craig A. Townsend
`Edwin Vedeje
`
`
`
`_-__..._.__-_—u
`
`Ex-Officio Member
`
`William R. Roush
`Indiana University
`(Secretary-Treasurer of the Division
`of Organic Chemistry of the
`American Chemical Society)
`
`Page 2 of10
`
`The Journal 0! Or ar_tic Cheqiistry
`ISSN 0022- 263
`is published
`iweekly by the American Chemical
`Society at 1155 16:1-i Street N.w.,
`Washington, DC 20036. Second-
`class pos
`c paid at Washin
`:1,
`DC, and a ditionsl mailing of ices.
`POSTMASTER: Send address
`changes to The Journal 3} Organic
`Chemist
`, Member & ubscriber
`Services.
`.0. Box 3337, Columbus,
`OH 43210.
`Canadian GST Reg. No. Rl2?5'i'l347.
`American Chemical Society
`1155 16th St. N.W.
`Washington. DC 20036
`(202) 372-4500
`TDD (202) 3T2-B733
`FAX (202) 8?2-4615
`Journals Department
`American Chemical Society
`2540 Olentsngy River Road
`P.0. Box 3330
`Columbus, OH 43210
`(614) 447-3600. Ext. 3171
`TELEX 6342086; FAX (614) 44'?-3745
`Member I Subscriber Services
`American Chemical Society
`P.O. Box 3337
`Columbus. OH 43210
`(614) 44?-3776
`(300) 333-9511
`
`PUBLICATIONS DIVISION
`Robert H. Marks. Director
`Journals Department: Charles R. Bertsch,
`Head; Marianne C. Brogan, Associate Head
`Editorial Office: Mary E. Scanlan. Man-
`ager; Kathleen E. Duffy, Joseph E. Yur-
`vati. Journals Editing Managers; Esther J.
`Oher, Associate Editor; Diane E. Ncedham,
`itor
`E:-ilsistant Editor; Mary B. Harig. Staff
`Advertising Office: Contcom. Ltd.. 500
`Post Road East. Weatport, CT 06880
`D Copyright 1991 by the American
`Chemical Society. Copyright permis-
`sion: An individual may make a single
`reprographic copy of an article in this pub-
`lication for personal use. Reprographic
`copying beyond that permitted by Section
`107 or 108 of the US. Copyright Law is
`allowed, provided that the appropriate per-
`copy fee is paid through the Copyright
`Clearance Center. Inc.. 27 Congress St...
`Salem. MA 01930. For reprint permission.
`please Write to the COPYl'i!l'l'Il. Administra-
`tor. Publications Division, at the ACS
`Washinston address.
`The paper used in this publication
`meets the minimum requirements of Amer-
`ican National Standard for Information
`Sciences—Permanence of Paper for
`Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z3343-
`1984.
`Editorial Information
`Instructions for authors and copyright
`transfer form are printed in the first issue
`of each volume. Please conform to these
`instructions when submitting manuscripts.
`Manuscripts for publication should
`be submitted to the Editor, Clayton H.
`Heathcock, at his Berkeley, CA, address.
`Correspondence regarding accepted
`papers and proofs should be directed to
`the Journals Department at the address
`above.
`Page charges of $25.00 per page may
`be paid for pslpers published in this jour-
`nal. Payment oee not affect acceptance or
`scheduling of papers.
`Bulk reprints of individual articles are
`available. For information write to Distri-
`
`bution Office at the ACS Washington
`address.
`The American Chemical Society and its
`Editors assume no responsibility for the
`statements and opinions advanced by con-
`tributors.
`Registered names and trademarks, etc..
`used in this publication, even without spe-
`cific indication thereof, are not to be con-
`sidered unprotected by law.
`Subscription and Business Information
`1991 subscription prices, including
`postage. (For membership information.
`Contact Office of Membership Develop-
`ment at the ACS Washington address.)
`Canada
`All
`and
`Dther
`U.S. Mexico Europe’ Countries’
`
`line
`Mumhuriyr I so
`331 51% M98
`Nonmember!
`5519
`5504
`
`Meml:|aII—ly'I I I9
`31'!‘ S108
`Nonmember!
`S515
`Suppleinmtary
`840
`
`8 B0
`3105
`8518
`:58
`
`new
`8322
`M26
`
`8 89
`I180
`I543
`858
`
`8198
`338%
`866?
`
`I 89
`I186
`I548
`858
`
`Nevnnd renevnleubecrlptionsshould
`be sent with payment to American Chemi-
`cal Society. Department L-0011, Colum-
`bus. OH 43268-0011. Subscriptions are
`available only on s calender year basis.
`Rates quoted do not apply to nonmemher
`subscribers in Japan. who must enter sub-
`scription orders with Ma.rur.en Company
`Ltd. 3-10 Nihonbssbi 2-chome, Chuo-liu,
`Tokyo 103, Japan. Tel:
`(03) 272-7211.
`Printed edition single issue prices:
`current year. $20.00; prior year. $22.00.
`Book volume price: $569.00. Foreign
`postage additional. Mai] orders should be
`sent to Microforms & Back Issues Office at
`the ACS Washington address.
`Phone orders can be placed for printed.
`microfiche. and microfilm editions by call-
`ing the ACS toll free at (800) 333-9511
`from anywhere in the continental United
`States; elsewhere call (614) 447-3776.
`Phone orders can be charged to Visa. Mas-
`terCard, or American Express accounts.
`Changes of address must include both
`old and new addresses with ZIP code and a
`recent mailing label. Send all address
`changes to Member 8: Subscriber Services.
`Please allow 6 weeks for change to become
`effective.
`Claims for missing numbers will not
`be allowed if loss was due to failure of
`notice of change of address to be received
`in the time specified; if claim is dated (a)
`North America: more than 90 days beyond
`issue date. (b) all other foreign: more than
`130 days beyond issue date. Hard copy
`claims are handled by Member 8:. Sub-
`scriber Services.
`Supplementary material is noted in the
`table of contents with o I. It is available as
`photocopy (810.00 for up to 3 pages and
`$1.50 per page for additional pages. plus
`$2.00 for foreign postage) or a 24x micro-
`fiche ($10.00. plus $1.00 for foreign poet-
`age). Canadian residents should add 7%
`GST. See supplementary material notice
`at end of journal article for number of
`pages. Orders must state whether for pho-
`tocopy or for microfiche and give complete
`title of article, names of authors. journal.
`issue date. and page numbers. Prepayment
`is required and prices are subject to
`change. Order from Microforms & Bscl:
`Issues Office at the ACS Washington
`address. Supplementary material except
`structure factors also appears in the micro-
`film edition and may be ordered by sub-
`scription (in microfiche only).
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`

`
`
`
`J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6659-6666
`
`6659
`
`was removed and rotary evaporated and the residue Kugalrohr
`distilled to give 120 mg (4%), bp 115-120 °C. ‘H NMR: 5 1.31
`(d. 3 H). 2.53 (In. 1 H). 2.6-1(m, 1 H). 3.17 (m. 2 H).
`I-Methyl-.1-methylenecyclobutane (6). Dimethyl sulfoxide
`(distilled from CaH,) was stirred under Ar for 30 min. Me-
`thyltriphenylphoephoniurn iodide (1.45 g, 3.6 mmol) was added
`and the reaction stirred for 2 h. 3-Methylcyclobutanone (120 mg,
`3.6 mmol) was dissolved in 2 mL of DMSO and added to the
`reaction via syringe. A cannula was connected from the reaction
`flask to a cold trap cooled in dry ice-acetone. A small amount
`of liquid was collected, and NMR and GC—MS were taken. 1H
`NMR.:'3 6 1.13 (d. 3 H). 2.24 (d. 2 H), 2.36 (In, 1 H), 2.80 (In, 2
`H), 4.71 (d. 2 H). GC-MS showed M“' at m/e 82.
`Metl|ylhieyclo[l.l.l]pentano (B).‘’' To crude 7 (5.1 mmol.
`1.1 g) in a round-bottomed flask that had been flushed with N,.
`cooled to -15 °C. and protected from light with Al foil was added
`thiophenol (10 mL. 0.1 mol) via syringe. The foil was removed
`and the stirred solution irradiated with a 300-77 tungsten Flament
`lamp for 30 min. A cannula was connected from the reaction flask
`to a cold trap cooled to -78 °C. and the reaction mixture was
`warmed to 70 °C. A small amount of clear distillate was collected
`
`(13) Della. E. W.; Pigou. P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1035.
`
`‘H NMR:‘ 2: 1.1 (s. 3 H),1.66(s,6 H). 2.48 (1
`(200 mg, 50%).
`H. s). GC-MS showed M* peak at rn/e 82.
`
`Acknowledgment. The authors wish to thank Prof.
`Josef Mich] and Mr. Piotr Kszynski for the generous gift
`of a sample of bicyclo[1.l.1]pentylacetic acid as well as
`many helpful discussions. This work was supported by
`NSF Grant DMB 8717730. The GE QE-300 NMR used
`in this work was purchased with funds provided by NIH
`RR 02336 and NSF CHE 8411177. The VG ZAB-2F!-IF
`MS and VG 12/ 253 Quad MS instruments used in this
`work were purchased with funds provided by NIH RR
`03001, NSF DMB 8414627, and the M. J. Murdock
`Charitable Trust.
`Registry No. 3, 136379-2l~0; B, 15189-13-1: 7, 136379-22-1'.
`3, 10555-48-3'. 1-iJicyclo[1.l.llpentylacetic acid, 131515-31-B;
`.N-hydroxy-2-(1-H)-Pyridinethione. 1121-30-3; 2-(2-rnetl1yl-3-
`chloropropyl)-1.3-dithiane. 53198-70-2; dithisne, 51330-42-B; 1-
`bromo-3-chloro-2-methylpropane, 6974-77-2; 3-rnethylcyclo-
`butanone trimethylene thioketal, 136379-23-2; 3-methylcyclo-
`butanone, 1192-08-1; methyltriphenylphosphonium iodide.
`2065-66-9.
`
`Direct Cleavage of Peptides from a Solid Support into Aqueous Buffer.
`
`Application in Simultaneous Multiple Peptide Synthesi‘
`
`Andrew M. Bray. N. Joe Maeji,* Robert M. Valerio, Rhonda A. Campbell, and H. Mario Geysen
`
`Chiron Mimotopes Pty. Ltd., P.O. Ba: 40, Clayton, Victoria. 3168. Australia
`
`Received May 20, 1991 [Revised Manuscript Received July 29, 1991')
`
`A method of simultaneous multiple peptide synthesis which integraus synthesis, side-chain deprotection, cleavage.
`and pu.ri.fication so as to afford peptide solutions suitable for immediate biological testing is described. The approach
`utilizes a novel diltetopiperazine-forming cleavable linker 1. Upon side-chain cleprotection. 1 gives 2, which is
`stable to a protocol designed to remove contexninants from the support-bound peptide prior to cleavage. Peptide
`cleavage is then effected by treating 2 with a neutral or near neutral buffer to give peptide 4, which carries a
`C-terminal diketopiperazine moiety, in good yield. In this study the glycolarnido and 4-loxyniethyllbenzsmido
`esters of 1 have been appraised. The approach is demonstrated in model studies on 7 and 8 and in the preparation
`and characterization of peptides 17-21. The general approach allows 10-100-nmol quantitim of many hundreds
`of peptides to be concurrently prepared in a relatively short period of time when used in conjunction with the
`multipin method of multiple peptide synthesis.
`
`Introduction
`
`Growth in the demand for synthetic peptides has been
`partly addressed by a range of techniques facilitating rapid
`peptide synthesis through parallel
`Simultaneous
`multiple peptide synthesis has been performed on resin,“
`cellulose” and grafted polyethyleneH° or polypropylene”
`
`(1) Preliminary communication: Bray. A. Mr. Maeji. N. J.; Geysen. H.
`M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990. 3.‘. 5811-5314.
`(2) Hougliten. R. A. PPIIC. NEH. cloud. Sci. U.-3.5.. 1985. 32, 5131-5135.
`(3) Wolfe, H. R. Manual to RIMPS multiple peptide aynfliesis system,
`DuPont/NEN Co.. Wilmington. DE. 1987.
`(4) Tjoeng. F. S.; Towery, D. 5.: Bulock, J. W.: Whipple. D. E.-, Fok.
`K. F.; Williams, M. H.;Z1.|pec. M. E...‘ Adams, S. P. Int. J. Pepi. Protein
`Res. 1990. 35. 141-146.
`(5) Hudson. D. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53. 817-624.
`(5) Frank. 11.; During, 11. Tetrahedron 1988. 44, 6031-6040.
`(7) Krchnak. V.; Vsgner, J.; Novac. J.'. Suchsukova. A.: Rouba]. J.
`Anal. Biochem. 1990. 1'59. B0"B3.
`(B) Geysen. H. M.; Meloen, R. H.: Bsrteling. S. J. Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. U.S.A. 198-1.. 81'. 3998-4002.
`
`supports. Despite the speed at which peptides can be
`assembled by a parallel synthesis strategy, the need for
`individual handling at the side-chain deprotection, cleav-
`age, and purification steps limits the number of peptides
`that can be conveniently prepared. Several methods of
`overcoming the postsynthesis bottleneck have been pro-
`posed. For example, closely related peptides can he syn-
`thesized on the same support and subsequently separated
`by HPLC.‘ Purification and characterization must be
`straightforward. however. if this method is to succeed. The
`use of specialized apparatus designed for multiple peptide
`cleavage simplifies cleavage and side-chain deprotection”
`
`(9) Geysen. H. M.; Rodda, 3. J.; Mason, '1'. J.; Tribbick, G.; S-ciroofa.
`P. G. J. hnmunol. Methods 1987. 102. 259-274.
`(10) Berg. R. I-1.; Alrndal, K.; Pederaen, W. B.; Holm, A4 Tarn. J. P.;
`Merrifield. R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989. In‘, 3024-8026.
`(11) Daniels. S. B.: Bernatowice. M. S.; Coull. J. M.; Koster. H. Tet-
`mhedran Lett. 11189. 30. 4345-4348.
`(12) Hougliton. R. A.; Bray, M. K.; Degraw, S. T.; Kirby, C. J. Int. J.
`Pept. Protein Res. 1985, 27, 673-678.
`
`0022-3263 f9l/ 1956-6659$02.50/ 0 © 1991 American Chemical Society
`
`Page 3 of10
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`
`6660 J. Org. Chem, Vol. 56, No. 23, 1991
`
`Scheme 1. Peptide Cleavage via Diketopiperasine
`Formation
`
`F'EDtide- NH
`
`FaDtida- NH
`
`Boo-NH
`
`N
`
`HM
`
`N
`
`°"""
`
`HO-Pin
`
`II DH I IIJFIII ifldl
`
`Peptida- NH
`
`Peptide-NH
`
`1ll'IArIVIIlUIDTl fin-1| uflhtnulflf
`T
`4-
`DUI‘!wuss El
`
`|-|3N
`
`---—-I>
`
`H2N
`
`N
`
`0 - Pin
`
`0
`
`0-Pin
`
`but does not obviate the need for individual peptide pu-
`rification. The multipin approach of Geysen” bypassed
`the need for individual handling by synthizing peptides
`on plastic pins arranged to complement the 96-well mi-
`crotitre plate used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
`(ELISA). By using the same support for both synthesis
`and testing, the screening of large numbers of peptides by
`ELISA was greatly simplified. Peptides bound to a solid
`support, however, have limited application. Until re-
`cently)” no method of simultaneous synthesis integrated
`peptide assembly, side-chain deprotection, cleavage, and
`purification so as to allow immediate biological testing.
`An integrated approach requires that the following
`strategy he adopted. Side-chain deprotection and peptide
`cleavage must be distinct processes, separated by a rigorous
`washing protocol designed to remove all organic contam-
`inants, which may prove toxic in subsequent assays.
`Peptide purity is then dependent solely on the efficiency
`of peptide synthesis and side-chain deprotection. The
`second requirement is that side-chain-deprotected peptides
`can be cleaved directly into a medium compatible with
`their final use. Generally, this would be aqueous. Po-
`stcleavage handling is then minimal and a fully integrated
`method for the simultaneous handling of large numbers
`of discrete peptides becomes viable.
`A linker which meets the dual requirement of stability
`under the conditions of peptide synthesis and side-chain
`deprotection and lability under biologically compatible
`conditions has been designed. As shown in Scheme I, a
`diketopiperazine-forming linker (I) is interposed between
`the solid support and the target peptide. Side-chain de-
`protection primes the linker for cleavage with the forma-
`tion of ammonium salt 2. Provided the assembly remains
`in the protonated form, it is stable to washing steps in
`organic solvents, aqueous,’ organic solvents. and low pH
`buffers. With the equilibrium generation of 3 in neutral
`aqueous buffer, cyclization, and hence cleavage to give 4,
`proceeds with good efficiency. The resulting peptides carry
`a diketopiperazine moiety at the C-terminal.
`In this study, the strategy outlined above has been ex-
`plored in conjunction with the multipin method of peptide
`
`(13) Maeji. N. J.: Bray. A. M.; Geyaen, H. M. J. Immunol. Methods
`mo, :34, 23-33.
`
`Page 4 of10
`
`Bray at a].
`
`synthesis. Studies on model system 1, where “Peptide”
`= (2,4-dinitrophenyl)-5-alanine (Dnp-flAla), show that l
`is stable to the conditions of peptide synthesis. 2 is stable
`to the precleavage washing protocol, and cleavage proceeds
`rapidly and efficiently in pH 7 phosphate buffer. The
`utility of the approach has also been demonstrated with
`the synthesis and characterization of a selection of test
`peptides. This approach has: allowed us to concurrently
`prepare thousands of discrete solution-phase peptides in
`a matter of weelra.‘~‘3 As the peptides are produced in the
`10-100-nmol range, they may be characterized by con-
`ventional techniques. These quantities are adequate for
`many biological, immunological, and pharmacological ap-
`plications. The peptides are suitable for applications where
`native C-termini are not required.
`
`Results
`
`Design and Preparation of Diketopipera2ine-
`Forming Handle 1. A cliketopiperazine-forming cleavable
`linker such as 1 has two requirements: a C-terminal N-
`alkylamino acid and an amino acid with a side-chain
`functional group upon which peptide synthesis can be
`performed. Rather than proline, another N-alkylamino
`acid such as sarcosine could have been used. The rate of
`diketopiperazine formation is, however. dependent on the
`N-alkylamino acid.“ Lysine was chosen as the second
`residue so that peptide synthesis could be continued on
`the side chain. The protecting groups in l were arranged
`for use with N"-Fmoc-protected amino acids with acid-
`labile side-chain protection. The stability/lability prop-
`erties of the linker can also be expected to be sensitive to
`the type of ester linkage to the solid support.“-1*‘
`In early
`work,” 1 was assembled on the side chain of serine. In this
`study linkers 5 and 6 based respectively on the glycol-
`amido" and 4-(oxymethyl)benzamido“ esters of lysyl-
`proline have been investigated.
`X
`
`Boo-Lira-Pro-O-Y-CO-Pin
`
`~NH
`
`Dnp-flAIa
`
`Rather than asseble the linker in piecemeal fashion
`a was done in earlier work,“ the ester bond was formed
`prior to coupling to the pin surface, hence bypassing the
`need to perform a moisture-sensitive dicyclohexylcarbc-—
`diimide [DOC]/4-ldimethylaminolpsridme (DMAP) me-
`diated coupling in an open container. Linker 5 was as-
`sembled onto the pins in two coupling step using pre-
`formed ester H and Boc—Lys(Fmoc)-OH. The dicyclo—
`hexylamine (DCHA) salt of compound 11 was prepared
`in 91% overall yield as shown in Scheme 11. The linker
`assembly was simplified further by incorporating 6 onto
`the pin in one step using dipeptide ester 16. An overall
`yield of 64% was achieved in the i'1ve—step synthesis of 16,
`presented in Scheme III.
`Stability and Cleavage Studies. As thousands of
`peptides are handled simultaneously, the method of syn-
`
`H4) Rothe. M.; Mazanslr, J. Liebigs Am. Chem. I974. 439-469.
`(15) Giralt. E.: Eritja, 11.; Pedroeo, E. Tetrahedron Letl. I981. 22.
`3779-3732.
`(16) Pedroso. E.; Grandma, A.; do In Hens, X4 Eritja. IL: Girllli. R.
`Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 27, 743-746.
`22-2 .
`(131 Baleux, F.: Calaa. B.:M¢1'3F. J. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1936. 3.
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`
`Direct Cleavage of Peptides from a Solid Support
`
`J. Org. Chem, Vol. 56, No. 23, 1991 666!
`
`Scheme II. Synthesis of Compound 11 (Pac = phenacyl {CH,COC.H.)l
`Frnao-Pro-DH!
`DGCJDMAPICHZCIZ
`
`1lHI O
`2] DCHN'El20lplIrol
`
`HOCI-i2C02Pac en-
`
`Fmoc-Pro-OCH2C02Pac —--—- Fmoc-Pro-OCH2C02H.DCHA
`
`'10
`
`11
`
`AmountofPepnde
`
`CleavedperPin(nmol)
`
`
`
`Percentcleaved
`
`owcowcnwcnwenntnweowcn
`1
`'2
`I
`I
`5
`!
`
`60
`
`90
`
`P20
`
`190
`
`-hC
`U0'
`
`S I
`
`-.l C3
`
`U!
`
`AmountofPeptide
`
`FlemainingonPin(nmol)
`
`Time (min)
`Figure 2. Cleavage of H-Lys(Dnp-6Ala)—Pro-OCl-l3C0-pin with
`0.1 M pH 7 phosphate buffer. Each data point is an average of
`30 pins.
`
`50
`
`o?
`is
`as
`§s
`5;
`
`Cycle
`Figure I. Stability of Boo-Lys(Dnp-,8Ala)-Pro-0CHgCO-pin (7)
`during peptide synthesis. After each discrete step six pins were
`removed and cleaved with 0.25 M NaOH. and the amount of
`material cleaved from the pin was determined. D, deprotection
`with 20% piperidine in DMF‘; W, wash with MeOH; C, dummy
`coupling with Fmoc-Gly-OH/DCC HOBE/DMF; A. acetylation;
`SCD. side-chain deprotection wit TFA/Ph0HjHS(CH,),SH
`(95:2.5:2.5, v wfv); SON; sonication in 0.1% l-{Cl in MeOH/H20
`(lzl, v,/V); p 3, precleavage soak in pH 3 buffer; pH'i', cleavage
`with pH 7 buffer.
`
`thesis used in multipin synthesis deviates. by necessity.
`from conventional solid-phase peptide synthesis Coupling
`reactions are performed for 16 h under nonanhydrous
`conditions. MeOH is used in postcoupling and postde—
`protection washing steps and washes are performed in open
`containers. Although these conditions appear not to
`compromise peptide quality, the stability of the ester link
`to these conditions was unknown. Hence the stability of
`the glyoolamido and -1-(oxymethynhenzarnido ester groups
`were reassessed using the model systems 7 and 8 to dem-
`onstrate compatibility with the Frnoc synthesis strategy
`as applied to pins. A stability study performed on 7 is
`summarized in Figure 1. One hundred and fifty-six de-
`rivatized pins were subjected to a mock heptapeptide
`synthesis in which six pins were removed for analysis
`followed each discrete step. Analysis comprised tri-
`fluoroacetic acid (TFAI treatment of the pins followed by
`cleavage into the wells of a microtitre plate with 0.25 M
`NaOH (3 h) and subsequent spectrophotometric deter-
`mination of the cleavage solutions. Less than 5% of the
`model system was lost from the pin surface over seven
`deprotection/wash/coupling cycles. In practice, occasions
`have been found where inadvertant cleavage of the gly-
`colamido linker 5 has occurred during peptide synthesis
`(unpublished results). In contrast, the benzamido linker
`6 has superior stability. Sporadic loss of this system from
`the pin through synthesis has not been encountered; con-
`sequently 6 has been adopted for most of our routine work.
`A two-step post-side-chain deprotection protocol was
`developed earlier for use with s diketopiperazine-forming
`cleavable linker assembled on the side chain of serine.”
`The protocol was designed to afford nontoxic peptide so-
`
`IDO
`90
`80
`"JD
`60
`50
`40
`
`
`
`Percentcleaved
`
`30
`20
`10
`0
`210
`
`I20
`
`150
`
`160
`
`Tirna (min)
`Figure 3. Cleavage of H-Lys[Dnp—.6A|a)-Pro-0CHgC¢,H.C0—pin
`with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7). Each data point is an average
`of 28 pins.
`
`lutions free of organic contaminants upon cleavage. So-
`nication of the pins in 0.1% HCl in MeOH-water effec-
`tively removes scavengers and byproducts arising from
`side-chain deprotection. Counterion exchange of tri-
`fluoroacetate for chloride also occurs in this step. MeOH
`and any remaining organic contaminants are then removed
`in a subsequent low pH aqueous buffer soak. Previously,‘3
`a 16-h soak in 0.1 M pH 5 phosphate buffer was advocated.
`Alternatives to this procedure have been examined in order
`to reduce the risk of inadvertent. peptide cleavage. A 1-h
`pH 5 soak has been employed but is not favored in the
`preparation of peptides for use with sensitive-cell mediated
`assays. The preferred method and the primary one used
`in this study is a 5-h soak in pH 3 citrate—phosphate buffer.
`The rate and efficiency of the buffer-mediated cyclica-
`tion—cleavsge step was also investigated. Figure 2 shows
`the results of a time trial cleavage study performed on 30
`pins derivatized with model system 7. Following treatment
`with TFA, sonication, and a 1-h precleavage soak in pH
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`
`6662 J. Org. Chem, Vol. 56', No. 23. 1991
`
`Bray et al.
`
`Schema III. Synthesis of Compound [6
`
`Boo-Pro-OH!
`
`DCCIDMAPICP-I2C|2
`
`1) TFA
`2] HCUIHOH
`
`H0m2 Pac —. Boc-Pro-OCH2-@-CO2Pac ——- H-5-ro-ocH2<:>-co-2Pac.HcI
`13
`14
`
`12
`
`Boo-Lys1Fmoc|-OH!
` F
`
`hfMO O
`
`Boc—Lys(Fmoc]-Pro-0CH2-©-C02H -— Boo-Lys(Frnoc)-Pro-OCH2-©-CO2PaO
`15
`16
`
`S
`
`100
`3
`
`Table I. Peptides Used in Method Appraisal
`amount
`cleaved‘
`lnmol)
`31
`
`positive ion FAB MS
`data’ (m/z)
`1309, [M — H + 2Na]*;
`1287, [M + NaI*
`1336. {M + Na]*
`
`sequence
`17 Ac-ASQGGLEDPN
`6Ala-eycIo{KP)
`18 Ac-PGPSDTPILF
`Bhla-cyclo(K.P)
`19 Ac-VQAAIDYING-
`,8Ala-cyclo(KP)
`20 Ac-WEIPEPYVWD-
`,8Ala-cyclo(KP)
`2| Ac-SYSMEH FRWG-
`.6Ala~cyclo(KP)
`“Analysis performed on the cleavage product from a single pin.
`‘Not obtained in 20 and 21.
`
`-~ 40
`3
`0 5 J5
`o '3 30
`
`fig
`'6 lg 35
`E3
`20
`g; ..
`
`10
`5
`o
`n
`
`so
`
`10 E
`an
`in
`
`.. 2
`
`so
`10
`o
`210
`
`so
`
`so
`
`so
`
`no
`
`150
`
`use
`
`Time (min)
`Figure 4. Cleavage of H-Lyannmsala)-Pro-ocH,c,H.co-pin
`with 0.1 M Nal-ICO3 (pH 8.3). Each data point is an average of
`28 pins.
`
`5 buffer, each pin was immersed in 150 nL of a 0.1 M pH
`7 phosphate buffer solution within a 96-well microtitre
`plate. Absorbances of the cleavage solutions were read
`every 10 min over a 3-h period. Within 3 h, 70% cleavage
`was achieved, yielding 150 ,uL of a 0.17 mM solution of
`cleaved peptide per pin. Two similar studies. summarized
`in Figures 3 and 4, were performed on model system 8. In
`these studies the alternative 5-h, pH 3 precleavage soak
`was used. Twenty-eight pins were treated with 0.1 M pH
`7 phosphate buffer for 3 h, after which time 64% of the
`available peptide was cleaved. Twenty-eight pins were
`cleaved with 0.1 M NaHCO,, to demonstrate the use of
`other near neutral cleavage media.
`In this case 79%
`cleavage was effected after 3 h. Cleavage with 0.25 M
`NaOH for 3 h removed all of the color from the pin surface
`and was taken to be 100% cleavage. This was confirmed
`by amino acid analysis on the cleaved pins. When water
`was substituted for the cleavage buffer, less than 2%
`cleavage was observed at 3 h.
`Application in Peptide Synthesis. Five decapeptide
`sequences, shown in Table I, were selected for critical
`appraisal of the cleavage method used in conjunction with
`the multipin method of peptide synthesis. Peptides were
`prepared on pins derivatized with the linker system 5. A
`.6—alanine (,6Ala) spacer was included between the linker
`and target peptide. The peptide set included two common
`test sequences, acyl carrier protein (ACP) 65-74“ 19 and
`
`Page 6 of10
`
`66
`
`-10
`
`40
`
`18
`
`1428. [M - H + 2Na|*;
`1406. [M + Na!‘
`
`sdrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) 1-10“ 21, which
`are widely used in the appraisal of automated peptide
`synthesizers. The peptides were synthesized using an
`Fmoc synthesis protocol, where couplings were effected
`using DCC/1-hydroxybenzotriazole (I-IOBt) in dimethyl-
`formamide (DMF). Following N-terminal capping by
`acetylation, the peptides were sidechain deprotected with
`TFA/phenol/ethanedithiol (EDT). Following sonication
`and a 5-h precleavage soak in pH 3 buffer, the peptides
`were cleaved from the pins into 150 aL of 0.1 M pH '7
`phosphate buffer in the wells of a microtitre plate.
`Peptides were examined by reverse phase HPLC, amino
`acid analysis. and in selected cases positive ion FAB mass
`spectrometry. Figure 5 presents chromatograms of four
`of the test peptides recorded at 214 um. None of these
`peptides were subjected to prior purification. In each case
`a single major peak was observed. In all cases a minor peak
`due to phenol, one of the scavengers used in side-chain
`deprotection, was observed at £3 15.77 min. The methio-
`nine-containing peptide 21 was obtained in both the oxi-
`dized a.nd reduced forms. Aerial oxidation of the solution
`in the presence of base afforded a product of in 18.13 min.
`Amino acid ratios were determined for all five cleaved
`peptides and are presented in Table II. Analyses were
`performed on solutions of high salt content and low pep-
`tide content, nonideal conditions for peptide hydrolysis
`
`(13) Atberton, EL: Logan. C. J.: Sheppard, R. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
`I Trans. 1981, 538-546.
`(19) Bergot. B. J .; Noble. R. L: Geiser. T. User Bulletin No. 16. Pep-
`tide Synthesizer, Appliecl Biosynterns, Inc., 1986.
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`
`Direct Cleavage of Peptides from a Solid Support
`
`J. Org. Chem. Vol. 56, No. 23, 1991 6663
`
`Table II. Amino Acid Analysis of Peptides Cleaved into
`0.1 M Phosphate Buffer (pH 7.0)
`ratios‘
`19
`1.3 (2)
`1.6 (2)
`0.7 (1)
`
`20
`
`21
`
`0.8 (1)
`1.3 (2)
`
`119(1)
`1.0 (1)
`0.8 (1)
`0.9 (1)
`
`1.1 (1)
`
`1.1 (1)
`1.8 (1)
`1.0 (1)
`1.1 (2)
`
`1.0 (1)
`1.1 (1)
`1.4 (1)
`
`amino acid
`A
`D
`E
`F
`G
`H
`1
`K’
`L
`M.
`Pl’
`R
`S
`T
`V
`W
`Y
`Mile’
`
`17
`2.0 (2)
`0.7 (1)
`2.1 (2)
`
`18
`
`0.7 (1)
`
`1.4 (2)
`
`0.6 (1)
`
`0.9 (1)
`
`0.7 (1)
`1.2 (1)
`
`1.0 (1)
`0.7 (1)
`1.0 (1)
`
`1.9 (2)
`1.1 (1)
`
`1.0 (1)
`1.2 (I)
`
`3.0 (2)
`
`6.5 (5)
`
`1.6 (1)
`
`3.? 93)
`
`0.6 (1)
`
`0.6 (1)
`0.8 (1)
`
`1.3 (1)
`
`1.1 (1)
`
`0.9 (1)
`
`1.0 (1)
`1.5 (1)
`
`0.8 (1)
`1.8 (2)
`0.8(1l
`1.1 (1)
`
`‘Values in parentheses are expected values. ‘Residues in linker.
`
`and phenyl isothiocyanate (PITC) derivatization.3°'“
`Nevertheless, the analysis results give ratios consistent with
`the target sequences. The quantity of peptide cleaved from
`the pin support is listed in Table 1. Typically, cleavage
`solutions contain between 20 and 60 nmol of peptide.
`Variation in the individual loading of the pins reflects the
`discrete nature of this solid support. The identity of three
`of the peptides was further confirmed by positive ion FAB
`mass spectrometry; the data are included in Table 1. Due
`to the high sodium concentration of the cleavage solution,
`[M + Na]" rather than [M + H]* signals were observed.
`
`Discussion
`
`In general, peptides prepared _by conventional solid-
`phase synthesis strategies are side-chain deprotected and
`cleaved from the solid support in a single step. This ne-
`cessitates individual purification of crude peptide. usually
`by preparative HPLC. Once pure, the peptide is further
`handled in preparation for biological assay. This type of
`approach is not practical when handling small quantities
`of thousands or even hundreds of peptides. The challenge
`is to devise strategies where large numbers of peptides can
`be synthesized, side-chain deprotected, purified, cleaved,
`and presented for biological testing in a simultaneous
`fashion.
`The propensity of resin-bound dipeptide esters with a
`C-terminal N-alkylamino acid residue to undergo intra-
`rnolecular aminolysis was recognized in the early 19703.99“
`Diltetopiperazine formation is a side reaction where
`quantitative loss of peptide from resin can occur under
`very mild conditions. However, provided the deprotected
`dipeptide remains protonated as in 2, it is relatively stable.
`As the rate of cyclization is dependent on the N-allrylamino
`acid“ and on the type of peptide~ester linkage to the solid
`support,”«“’ there is scope to tune the reaction to a desired
`set of cleavage conditions. Though regarded as a problem
`reaction, it satisifies the criteria required for a buffer-labile
`cleavsge reaction.
`
`(20) Cohen, S. An, Stryclom, D. J. Anni. Biochem. 1938. I74, 1-6.
`(21) Inglis. A. 3.; Ba:-tone. N. A.; Finlayscm, J. R. J. Biochem. Binphys.
`Methods 1988. .15, 219-254.
`(22) Gisin, B. F.; Msrrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1912. 94.
`3102-3106.
`(23) Khosla, M. C.: Smeby. R. FL: Bumpus. F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
`1912. .94, 4721-4724.
`(24) Rothe. M.; Msnnek, J. Angew. Chem, Int. Ed. Engi. 1972. H.
`293.
`
`Page 7 of10
`
`Figure 5. HPLC chromatograms of peptides cleaved into 0.1 M
`pH 7 phosphate buffer. Each trace was performed on 80 .uL of
`the cleaved peptide solution. Detection at 214 nm. Solvent A,
`H20 (0.1% TFA); solvent B. 60% CH3CN (0.1% TFA). Linear
`gradient A to B from 5 min to 20 min. Column: Merck LiCh-
`rosphere 100 RP-18 5 pm.
`
`Using the lysylproline assembly presented in Scheme I,
`cyclization, and hence cleavage, could be triggered by a pH
`7 buffer solution. In practice, the cleavage properties of
`5 and B were found to be similar. In preliminary work,
`where the cleavable linker was assembled on the side chain
`of serine. cleavage was shown to take place in phosphate
`buffer solutions of pH 6 to pH 8 over a range of ionic
`streng1‘..hs.13 Other near neutral buffer solutions have also
`proved useful. As expected,” cyclization was found not
`to occur to an appreciable extent during post-side-chain
`deprotection steps, where the assembly 2 was maintained
`in a protonated form. This is the first described integrated
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 10
`
`

`
`66641 J. Org. Chem, Vol. 56, No. 23. 1991
`
`Bray et al.
`
`hydrin in Me0H/AcOH (99:1.l or by viewing under 254-um UV
`light as appropriate. DMF was vacuum distilled from ninhydrin.
`Ether was distilled from sodium]benzophenone. EtOAc, TFA.
`and CH,C1, were distilled. Dioxan, Ac0H, MeOH, and petroleum
`spirits (40-60 °C fraction, hereon refered to as petrol) were of
`AR grade. Et,,N and N-methylmorpholine (NMM) were distilled
`from calcium hydride. DCC, HOBt, DCHA, phenacyl bromide
`(Pac-Br), phenol, and EDT were from Fluka. Switzerland. DMAP
`and 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (FDNB) were purchased from the
`Aldrich Chemical Company. Milwaukee. WI.
`4-(Hydroxy-
`methyllbenzoic acid (HMB). Boo-L-Lys(Fmoc)-O1-I, Boc-1.-Pro-
`OH. and Fmoc-protected amino acids were from Novabiochem,
`Switzerland. Glyeolic acid (Glyc) was from Sigma, St. Louis, MO.
`Solutions were dried using anhydrous Na2SO,.
`Phenseyl Glycolato (9). Et,N (14.0 ml’... 100 mmol) and
`Pat:-Br (20.0 g, 100 mmol) were added to a stirring suspension
`of glyeolic acid (7.6 g, 100 mmol) in Et0Ae (300 mL). After 20
`h, the solution was diluted with warm Et0Ac (300 mL) and
`extracted with war

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket