throbber
CI] 7S7551
`
`PATENT AP?LICATION SERIAL NO:
`
`Y;i#lffillXldti'Htl:3
`iuf *pco*P@
`
`090 l{$ 12/05/9r 0??97851
`
`PTO-1556
`$/87)
`
`101 t'175'00 cK
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 249
`
`ILMN EXHIBIT 1022
`
`

`
`1ilililililil||ilililillil
`
`ililflil]tililtililtl
`tililtill
`
`U.S. PATENT APPLICATION
`
`sERIAL NUilEEK
`
`07 /797 ,551
`
`TILINI'
`
`l,AI G
`
`11/ t9/91
`
`CLASS
`
`530
`
`UIlUUT AKI
`
`IJNII
`
`l8rr
`
`RICHARD A. H0UGHTEN, SOLANA BEACH, CA; JULI0 H. CUERVO, LA JOLLA' CA;
`CLEIIENClA PINILLA, CARDIFF, CA; JON R. APPEL JR., CARDIFF, CA; SILVIE
`BLONDELLE, LA JOLLA, CA.
`
`* :t Q Q l'l f I N U I N G D A T A :k tt :t :t t't :t Jt J< * :t :l tt :t :t rt fc r. t( tt t( tt
`vERTFIED THrS APPLN lS A CIP 0F 07/701,658 05/15/91
`AND A CrP 0F 07/617,023 1t/21/9O
`
`,r,rF0R; I cN/pcT AppL I CAT | 0NS**rt*:trc*rr*rtrc*
`VERIFIED
`
`F0RE I GN F I L ING L I CENSE GRANTE0 02/04/92
`
`*'t't*ft S|'IALL ENT ITY ttrr:trc:t
`
`uK
`!tAtt
`COUNTRY
`
`-nEE | -
`DRAI{ING
`
`IUIAL
`CLAIIIS
`
`INl,EI'ENUEN 1
`CLAIMS
`
`TILINE
`TBB
`RECETVED
`
`At II,RNEY SUT,KE I NU,
`
`CA
`
`7
`
`8z
`
`s I ,240.00
`
`PR-00 I -2
`
`Qo
`lr,leoo
`
`j
`F
`
`DRESSLER, G0L0Sl.l tTH, SHoRE ,
`SUTKER 6 I'1ILNAI.1OT.', LTO.
`TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA
`I80 NORTH STETSON AVENUE, SUITE
`cHtcAGo, rL 50601
`
`47oo
`
`svxrnEsrs 0F EQUu,IoLAR l,ruLTrpLE oLrcor'rER rlrxruREs, EspEctALLy 0F
`OL IGOPEPT I DE I.lIXTURES
`
`This is to certify that annexed hereto is a true copy fnon the records of the Unlted States
`Patent and Trademark offic€ of the application as originally flled lrhich ls identifled above'
`By authority of the
`COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRAOEMARKS
`
`Certifying Officer
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 249
`
`

`
`I
`
`PR-001-2
`
`TRANSI"',TTAL OF UTILITY PATENT APPLICAT: ,.J'FOR FILING
`Ceilification under 37 cFR l.io (tf aooticabte) 0l ?E?S51'
`U I d 'r d ut-Ir
`Cerlificatign under 37 CFR 1.10 (lt applicable)
`I
`tl.rlus
`I'
`%
`malllrp label nurnber l'
`
`Dde of depostt
`
`PATENT
`
`I hrrcby ceilify that lhb Trensminal btter. oncloeed epplication, end any other documents referred to as enclosed
`hercin ere being deposilcd in an cnvclopc whh lhc Uniled States Postal Service 'Exprcss Mail Post o|tice to
`Addrcsses' rervice under 37 CFR 1 .10 on the date indirxed abovc and eddressed to the Commissioner of Patents and
`Trademarks, Washingrton, D.C. 20A1.
`
`ileanne Anthony
`ffyped or prlntsd name of perBon mailing appticatbn)
`
`of person mailing
`
`'COrurtf
`
`.-
`
`(Co1.
`
`OTHER THAN A SMALL ENTITY
`
`Rate
`
`Fee
`
`ffi
`t $ 630
`:ii:ii:ii:i''lii::.!':
`':'.i:.1l.ili]',:.
`I$ 20.
`s
`18 60.
`+ 0200 .
`TOTAL
`
`s
`
`$
`
`$
`
`Attorney's Signature
`
`ano
`
`'
`
`Conespondene Address:
`DRESSLEF, cON-DS?rtmt, SHORE SUIKER & MttMtvOW LTD.
`Two Prudentlal Plaza
`180 Nrrth Stetson Avenue
`Suits 4700
`Chicago, lllinois 6O6Ot
`Tel.rphone: (312) 616-3400
`
`f SSfOruER OF PATEI,IIS AND TRADEIJhFKS
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`Sir:
`Transin|ttedherewi|hbrf|||ng|stheuti|itypatentapp|icat|onof|nventor(s):@''.
`andentitled: svNmHnsrs or nourMor,an Mut,rrpt,r oltcor,tgn lttxrunps,,EspEcrdllt-il
`' nT,TGOpnpTTnE MTV'nURES
`1. Enclosed are:
`El A duglicate copy of thls transmittat leiler..
`El one stamped, self-addressed postcard for the p 'b Mall Room date stamp.
`E One utility patent applicatlon containlng pages .j - _l!L, and
`E aoaairiilon oi bath for the utility palent apptication Including a power of anorney/ungecuted
`- 'sheets
`El drawings: tr 1 copy of
`6i tormalOrawingsiQlf
`ts 1 coPy of -seysl- sheets of informalOrawings, QB
`F I set of
`F
`Brislol board sheets or orlglnal, tormal drawings.
`E A certified copy of a .
`appllcation, tfo.
`tl An associate power of attorney.
`tr An lnformation Disclosure Stitement.
`El :-Q!e- Verified Statement(s) relating to small entity status. (unexecuted)
`tr Oher: c+F+an'Fnr Under i5 U.s.c;1.821(f) an-d computer-readable disc containing
`secuence ErE
`The filing fee has been calcutaled as shown betow:
`(Col. 1)
`SMAIIENITTY
`Number Filed
`Number Extra
`Rgtc
`!E:!tFll?t!ttt
`:.-rI 0 315
`ililiiilititiiitliii{i{Hi{i{iii{i
`82 -20 .
`x0 10.
`-62-
`I 520
`t
`1r -3
`x$ 30. E 240
`-B-
`Independent Claims
`I
`+ 0100 .
`tvtuttipte Dependent Clalm prcsented
`$
`Col- t h
`I lh3
`lcso than zero,
`TOTAL
`31, 175
`cnlry'u incol a
`tr Please.charge my Deposit Account No. 04-1644 in the amount of g
`E I che_ck in the amouni of.0 .r.+zs.oo
`to cover the ntingiffindosed.
`El The Commissloner ls auttrorizeo to cnlrgl$frenr ot ne ionowfig amornrilslbciared wirh rhis
`oommunicatlon or credit any overpayment'to'Deposll Account tto] Ot.teee:---
`Fl Additlonal{iling fees urider g7 6rn t.t6 or'deflcieniles In remittanceJ therefor.
`g Additional.proCesslng fEes under 37 cFH t.ti ir oendienclei in iimiiuidis herefor.
`El Any rlallcleFcy In any patent lssue fea under 37 CFR l.lE for which part[i payment ls made.
`Theenclosedutllitypatenl_applicali_o1 lgglqtedlo !r.s..gerigl-No. 071701,658, ifiled r,lay 16,. leel
`u.s. Serial. No. 021617,023 filed Novenber 2I, 1990--_-,
`rovernber 19, 1991
`
`Fce
`
`OR
`
`OR
`
`OR
`
`OR
`
`OR
`
`2.
`
`For:
`
`Basic Fee
`
`TolalClaims
`
`3.
`
`DStg: -
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 249
`
`

`
`/lfnn -/// fl.
`
`Express MaiI Ling Label *o. n"rnJr/rrrw
`
`-1-
`
`,-, /
`29:
`qlgruFFrs er _Egumolr4 ltuLIT pLJl. g!:ggIP3
`ttIXTUREg, E8PECIAL,III Of OLIGTOPEPTIDE I,IIXTURES
`
`07 737551
`
`Description
`Cross-Reference to Related ApBlication
`plicptio
`This is a continuation-in-p3*-2)f
`Serial No. 07/7OL,658 fiLed May 16, 1991r\tha
`aEa
`continuation-in-part of application Serial No.
`-
`o7/6L7,o23, flledNovernber r,
`ffiffiI"
`t\
`are incorporated by reference.
`
`Technical Fie1d
`The present invention relates to the organic
`synthesis of oligoneric sequences of compounds. More
`particularly it relates to stepwise synthesis of
`nultiple independent sequences, especially oligoneric
`peptide chains.
`
`Background and Related Art
`Over the last several years, developments in
`peptide synthesis technology have resulted in autornated
`synthesis of peptides acconplished through the use cf
`soli.d phase synthesis methods. The solid phase
`synthesis chenis'r-ry that made this technoLogy possible
`was first described in Merrifield et al. J. Aner. Chem.
`$9g-, 95r2L49-2154 (1963). The rrMerrifield methodrr has
`for the rnost part renained unchanged and is used in
`nearJ.y all automated peptide synthesizets available
`today.
`
`In brief, the Merrifield rnethod Lnvolves
`synthesis of a peptide chain on solid support resin
`particles. These particles typically consist of
`polystyrene cross-llnked wlth dlvinyl benzene to form
`porous beads which are insoluble in both water and
`various organic solvents used in the synthesis p:otocol.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 249
`
`

`
`-2
`
`The resin particleE contain a fixed amount of amino- oE
`hydroxylnethyL aronatic rnoiety which aerveE as the
`linkage polnt f,or the firEt amino acld in the peptide.
`Attachnent of the first anino acid entails
`chernically reacting its carboxyl-ternrinal (C-terminal)
`end with derivatized resin to for:m the carboxyl-terminal
`end of the oligopeptide. The alpha-anino end of the
`anino acid is typically blocked wlth a !-butoxy-carbonyl
`group (t-Boc) or with a 9-fluorenylnethyloxycarbonyl
`(F-Moc) group to prevent the amino group which could
`othenrise react from partlcipating in the coupling
`reaction. The side chain groups of the anLno acids, if
`reagtive, are also blocked (or protected) by various
`benzyl-derived protecting groups in the form of ethers,
`thioethers, eEters, and carbanates.
`The next step and subsequent repetitive cycles
`involve deblocking the amino-terninal (N-terminal)
`resin-bound anino acid (or terrnlnal residue of the
`peptide chain) to renove the alpha-anino blocking group,
`followed by chenical additlon (coupling) of the next
`blocked amino acid. This process is repeated for however
`many cycles are necessary to synthesize the entire
`peptide chain of interest. After each of the coupling
`and deblocking steps, the resin-bound peptide is
`thoroughly washed to renove any residual reactants
`before proceeding to the next. The solid support
`particles facilitate renoval of reagents at any given
`step as the resin and resin-bound peptide can be readily
`filtered and washed while belng held in a colunn or
`device with porous openings.
`Synthesized peptldes are released from the
`resin by acid catalysis (typlcalJ.y with hydrofluoric
`acid or trifluoroacetic acid), whlch cleaves the peptide
`fron the resin leaving an anide or carboxyl. group on its
`C-terurinal ami.no acid. Acidolytic cLeavage also serves
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 249
`
`

`
`-3-
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`to remove the protecting groupE from the side chains of
`the anino acids in the synthesized peptide. Finished
`peptides can then be purified by any one of a variety of
`chromatography nethods.
`Though most, peptides are syntheEized with the
`above described procedure uEing autourated instruments, a
`recent advance in the solid phase nethod by R.A.
`Houghten allows for synthesiE of nultiple independent
`peptides sinultaneously through uranually perfotmed
`neans. The ttSimultaneous Multiple Peptide Synthesisrl
`(nS!!PStt) process is described in U.S. Patent No.
`4,63L,2LL (1985); Houghten, @L,
`' 92;5131-5135 (1985); Houghten et aI., Int. J. Peptide
`Protein Res. , 4-167.3-678 (1986); Houghten et aI.,
`Biotechnicrues, {, 6, 522-528 (1986), and Houghten' U.S.
`Patent No. 41531 r2LL, whose disclosures are incorporated
`by reference.
`Illustratlvely,
`the SMPS process enploys
`porouE containers such as plastic bags to hold the solid
`support synthesis resin. A Merrifield-type solid-phase
`procedure is carried out with the resin-containing bags
`grouped together approprlately aL'any given step for
`addition of the same, desired amLno acid residue. The
`bags are then washed, separated and regrouped for
`addition of subsequent sane or different amino acid
`residues until peptides of the intended Length and
`sequence have been synthesized on the separate resins
`within each respective bag.
`That nrethod allows nuJ.tiple, but separate,
`peptides to be synthesized at one tine, since the
`peptide-linked resins are maintained in their separate
`bags throughout the process. The SMPS nethod has been
`used to synthesize as many as 200 separate peptides by a
`single technician in as little asi two weeks, a qate
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 249
`
`

`
`-4-
`
`vastly exceeding the output of nost autonated pept,lde
`synthesizers.
`A robotic device for autonated nultiple
`peptide synthesls has been recently commercialized. The
`device performs the sequentlal steps of nultiple,
`separate solld phase peptlde synthesis through iterative
`mechanical-intensive neans. This instrunent can
`synthesize up to 96 separate peptides at one tine, but
`is linited at present by the quantity of its peptide
`yield.
`
`Several research groups have reported the
`synthesis of synthetic conbinatorial libraries of
`peptides. Those reports are discussed below.
`Of interest is work by Geysen et aI., which
`deals with nethods for syntheslzing peptides with
`spebific sequences of amino aclds and then using those
`pept,ides to identify reactionE with various receptors.
`Geysen et aI. rs lrork presupposes that one has a prior
`knowledge of the general nature of the sequences
`required for the particular receptors, so that the
`appropriate group of peptides can be synthesized. See
`U.S. Patents Nos. 4,70.8r'i,t71 and 4r833,O92i P.C.T.
`Publications Nos. WO 84103506 and WO 84/03564, Geysen et
`dl. ' Proc. Natl.. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., $!:3e98-4oo2 (1984);
`Geysen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , 82.2L78-L82
`(1985) i celzsen et a1., in Synthetic Peptides as
`Antigens, 130-149 (1985) i Geysen et aI., J. Inmunol.
`Meth., LO2z259-274 (1987); and Schoofs et al.,
`J. Inmunol., !!-9,:611-616 (1988) .
`In published PCT application PcTlAU8s/ooL65
`(WO 86/00991), Geysen describes a method for detetmining
`so-called rrmimotopesrr. A minotope is def ined as a
`catamer (a pollnrer of pieclsely defined sequence formed
`by the condensation of a precise number of snall
`moLecul.es), which in at least one of its conforr,i.tiotr"
`
`L0
`
`t5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 249
`
`

`
`-5-
`
`has a surface region with the equivalent molecule
`topology to the epitope of which it iE a ninic. An
`epitope is defined as the surface of an antigenic
`molecule which is delineated by the area of interaction
`with an antibody nolecule.
`The ninotopes are synthesized on a series of
`solid pollmer (e.9. polyethylene with a coating of
`grafted acrylic acid) rods having a diaureter of about 4
`nn and a length of about 50 nm. A spacer fomed by
`reaction of the e-amino group of l-Boc-J.ysine nethyl
`ester and then t-Boc-alanine was added to the resj.ns,
`followed by removal of the !-Boc group to provide an
`anino group to be used to begin the syntheses.
`A urixture of blocked amino acids containing
`different anounts of each of the blocked twenty anino
`acids to be used was dissolved in dinethyl forurarnide and
`then coupled to the rods. That first coupling was
`repeated three tinres using conventional solid phase
`synthesis techniques. twenty anino acid residues hrere
`individually next added so that twenty s-mer sequences
`vrere prepared, each having a single, known anino acid
`residue at the anino-terrrinus and a mixture of arnino
`acid residues at each'of the four other positions of the
`chain. Each of those twenty rod-linked peptides was
`then individually reacted with each of the twenty aurino
`acid residues to for:n 400 (2O x 2Ol 6-mer peptides
`having the two anino-terninal positions defined and the
`four reuraining positions as mixtures. Ttro more
`positions of nixtures of amino acids were then added,
`and the terminal anine acetylated to fom N-acetyl
`8-r€rs Linked to the rods those first two arnino acid
`positions were undefined (nixtures), followed by two
`aefined positions, followed by four undefined positions'
`(nixtures), followed by the spacer and then the
`supporting rods.
`
`r
`
`10
`
`L5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 249
`
`

`
`-6-
`
`The 400 rod-linked N-acetyl 8-rner peptide
`nixture preparations were then screened in an ELISA
`assay using a nonocLonal antibody to a desired antigenic
`protein. The 8-ners having the best binding to the
`antibody were identifled. Tlso sets of further 8-mers
`that contained the identified best-binding 2-mer
`sequences within thoEe 8-ners were prepared.
`A first set contained nixed anino acids at the
`three C-terninal positions, followed toward the
`N-termJ.nus, by a position containing each of the twenty
`anino aclds rnade by twenty separate coupLingsr.the
`identified 2-ner sequences, two further nixtures at the
`, next two positions, and an N-terninal acetyl group. The
`second group contained rnixed anino acids at the four
`C-terminal positions, the identified 2-mer seqluences, a
`position made by separate couplings of each of the
`twenty anino acids, nixed amino acids as the tetminal
`residues and an N-terminal acetyl group.
`Each of those rod-Ilnked N-acetyl 8-mers was
`again screened in an ELISA with the nonoclonal antibody.
`The best binding sequences for each group were
`ident:',fied, and thus 4-mer, best-binding sequences were
`idenLified.
`The above process of separately adding each of
`the anino acids on either side of identified best-
`binding sequences $ras repeated until an optinuur binding
`sequence was identified.
`The above nethod, while elegant, suffers fron
`severaL disadvantages. First, owing to the srnalL size
`of each rod used, relatively snalL arnounts of each
`peptide is produced. Second, each assay is carried out
`usilg the rod*linked peptides, rather than the free
`peptides in solution. Third, even though specific
`anountE of each blocked anino acid are used to prepare
`the 4ixed anino acid residues at the desired positions,
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 249
`
`

`
`-7 -
`
`there is no way of aEcertaining that an equimolar amount
`of each residue is truly present at those positions.
`fn addition, Furka et al., (1988, 14th
`fnternational Congress of Biochemistry, Volune 5,
`Abstract FRs013) described the synthesis of nine
`tetrapeptides each of which contained a single residue
`at each of the amino- and carboxy-termini and mixtures
`of three residues at each position therebetween. The
`abstract futher asserts that those authorsr experinents
`indicated that a nixture containing up to 180
`pentapeptides could be easily synthesized in a single
`run. No biological assays were reported.
`Recent reports (Devlin et a1., &,ie!ge,
`24924O4-4OS [1990] and Scott et aI., S@,,
`249t386-39O [1990]) have described the use of
`recornbinant DNA and bacterial expression to create
`highly complex nixtures of peptides. For example, a
`4S-nucleotide base pair stretch of DNA was syntheEized
`in which the individual nucleotide bases were varied to
`contain all four possible nucleotide bases (guanine,
`adenine, cytosine and .thlmidine) at every position in
`the synthesized DNA chain, except at each third position
`(3, 6, g, etc.) which contained only guanine and
`cytosine. The onission of adenine and thlnnidine at
`every third position in the synthesized DNA removed the
`possibility of chain terminator triplet codons ending in
`A or T, such as TAA or TGA.
`Tbe resulting DNA sequence would then code for
`a mixture of 15-ner peptides with all conbinations of
`the 20 naturally occurring anino acids at each position.
`Those investigators fused the 45 synthetic
`nucleotide sequence to a gene coding for the coat
`protein of a simp}e bacterlophage and created a Jarge
`Ilbrary of these bacteriophages. Each menber of the
`Library contained a different 45-ner DNA fusion sequence
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 249
`
`

`
`-8-
`
`and therefore each menber of the library resulted in a
`different 15-ner peptide fused to the outer coat protein
`of its correspondlng futly assernbLed bacteriophage
`particle. Screening of the recombinant bacteriophage
`particles in a biochenical asEay allowed the
`investigators to find individual peptide-coat protein
`fusionE (bacteriophages) that nere active in that assay
`by enrichnent, seLection and clonal isolation of the
`enrictred bacteriophages that contained active peptide
`fusions. By determining the DNA sequence of the cloned
`bacteriophages, the investlgators could deduce which
`peptide sequences were active in their asEay.
`That rnethod yielded severaL peptlde sequences
`from a nixture of 107 or nore reconbinant
`bacteriophages. Each of the 15-ner peptides found
`contained the same four-anino-acld sequence somewhere
`within its overall sequence, thereby allegedly
`validating the assay accuracy and methodological
`approach.
`
`The reconbinant DNA nethod is extrenely
`screening large nurnbers of peptides.
`powerful for
`is Liurited in that the peptides must be
`However, it
`fused to a larger protein aE a result of and integral to
`the design of the nethod. The peptide-protein fusions
`(and corresponding bacteriophage particles) are likely
`to be unreactive in nany biochenical, biological and in
`vivo assays where the peptides nust be present in
`solution wlthout steric hindrance or confor"national
`distortion. In addition, the nethod results in an over-
`representation of some sequences of peptides due to the
`inherent redundancy of the genetic code which has
`sevbral codons per amino acid in some cases and only ond
`codon per anino acid in others.
`Still
`further, neither group reported *data as
`being definitive for the deter:nination of optional
`
`10
`
`t5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 249
`
`

`
`-9-
`
`peptide ligands for strepavidin (Devlin et a1.) ' or for
`the two nonoclonal antibodies raised against
`uryohemorythinin (Snith et a1.). Neither group provided
`a single specific answer conparabl.e to the expected
`sequence.
`
`More recently, Fodor et aI., Sgielgg, 251.767-
`773 (1991), descrl.bed the sotid phase synthesis of
`mixtures of peptides or nucleotideE on glass microscope
`slides treated with aninopropyltriethoxysilane to
`provide anine functional groups. Predetennined amino
`' acids were then coupled to predefined areas of the
`slides by the use of photomasks. The photolabile
`protecting group I'IVOC (nitroveratryIoxycarbonyJ.) was
`used as the anino-terminal protecting group.
`By using irradiation, a photolabile protecting
`group and masking, an array of Lo24 different peptides
`coupled to the sllde was prepared in ten steps"
`Irnmunoreaction with a fluorescent-l-abeled monoclonal
`antibody $ras assayed with eplfluorescence nicroscopy.
`This elegant rnethod is also linited by the
`small amount of peptide or oligonucleotide produced, by
`use of the synthesized peptide or nucleotide affixed to
`the slide, and also by the resolution of the photomasks.
`This rnethod is also leEs useful where the epitope bound
`by the antlbody is unknown because aLl of the possible
`sequences are not prepared.
`The prinary linitation of the above new
`approaches for the circunvention of individual screening
`of nillions of individual peptides by the use of a
`cornbinatoriaL library is the inability of the peptides
`generated in those systens to interact in a trnormaltr
`manner with acceptor sLtes, analogous to natura\
`interaction processeE (i.e., in solution at a
`concentration relevant to the receptors, antibody
`binding sites, enzlme bindlng pockets, or the like being
`
`L0
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 249
`
`

`
`-10-
`
`studied without the exclusion of a large percentage of
`the possible conbinatorial library). Secondarily, the
`expression vector systens do not readily permit the
`incorporation of the D-forns of the natural anino acids
`or the wide variety of unnatural arnine acids which would
`be of interest in the study or development of such
`interactions.
`The interest in obtainlng biological-ly active
`peptides for pharuraceutical, diagnostic and other uses
`would make desirable a procedure designed to find a
`nixture of peptides or a single peptide within a mixture
`with optirnal actlvity for a target application.
`Screening nrixtures of peptides enables the researcher to
`greatly sinrplify the search for useful therapeutic or
`diagnostic peptide compounds. MixtureE containing
`hundreds of thousands or more peptides should be readily
`screened since many biochenical,, biological and sma}I
`aninal assays are sensitive enough to detect activity of
`conpounds that have been diluted down to the nanogram or
`ranqte, the concentration
`even picogran per milliliter
`range at which naturally occurring biological signals
`such as peptides and proteins operate.
`A1most aLl of the broad diversity of
`biologically relevant ligand-receptor (or affector-
`acceptor) interactions occur in the presence of a
`complex milieu of other substances (i.e., proteins make
`up approxinately 5-1o percent of plasma, e.g. aLbunin
`l-3 percent, antibodies 2-5 percent-salts' Iipids/f'ats,
`etc.1 . This is true for virtually all biologicall.y
`active compounds slnce nost are conmonly present, and
`active, at nanomolar and lower concentrations. These
`conipounds are also, in most instances, produced distant"
`fron their affection sites. That a small peptide (or
`other molecuLe) can readily xfindtr an acceptor qystem,
`bind to it, and affect a necessary biological function
`
`1-0
`
`L5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 13 of 249
`
`

`
`-11 -
`
`prior to being cleared from the circulation or degraded
`suggested that a single specific peptide sequence can be
`present in a very wide diversity, and concentration, of
`other individual peptides and stiil. be recognized by its
`particular acceptor system (antibody, cellular receptor'
`If one could devlse a means to prepare and
`etc.).
`screen a synthetic conbinatorial library of peptldes,
`then the notmal exquisite selectivity of biological
`aftectot/acceptor systems could be used to screen
`through vast nurnbers of synthetic oligopeptide3.
`The availability of a wide variety of clearly
`identified peptides ln relatively linited rnixtures would
`greatly facilitate the search for the optirnun peptide
`for any particular therapeutic end use appllcation. At
`the present tine, researchers are hanpered by the
`inability to rapidly create, identify and screen large
`numbers of peptides with specific receptors. Work such
`as reported by Geysen has been valuable where the
`general nature of the required amino acid residue
`sequence couLd be previously determined, so that the
`specific peptldes of interest could be individually
`for:mulated. However, such techniques cannot insure that
`the optinun peptides,are identified for testing.
`It would therefore be of considerable interest
`to have a nethod for the precise synthesis of nixtures
`of peptides in which lndividual peptide sequences can be
`specificalty defined, such that a comprehensive array of
`peptides is available to researchers for the
`identification of one or more of the optimum peptides
`for reaction with receptors of interest, fron which one
`can derLve optinun therapeutic naterlals for treatnent
`of various organisrn dysfunctions. It would also be of
`value for such a process to have the capability to
`produce eErivalent sequences of other types of \
`oligomeric conpotinds.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 14 of 249
`
`

`
`-L2-
`
`Brief Surnrnary of the Invention
`In one asPect, the invention herein
`contemplates a process that provides for the synthesis
`of conplex nixtures of step-growth oligomers, especially
`peptides, wherein each position in the oligorneric
`sequence chain contains an equinolar representation of
`reacted bifunctional monomeric repeating unit conpound,
`such as an amino acid residue, added at that step. In
`peptide synthesis, the urethod circunvents the problen of
`unequal reaction yiel,ds during addition of blocked amino
`acids reacted as a rnixture in a coupling step in the
`Merrifield solid phase synthesis procedure. Use of the
`present rnethod also provides a relatively rnuch larger
`amount of coupled oligomer than previously contemplated.
`In its preferred enbodiment, the invention
`conternplates the organic synthesis of conplex equinolar
`nixtures of oligopeptide sequences on a solid support
`rnaterial. The equinolar ollgopeptide sequences consist
`essentiall.y of chains of amino acid residues linked
`end-to-end by peptide bonds wherein the anino acid
`residue incorporated at any one position in the chaLn
`can be varied, such as to contain aLl or a conbination
`of the twenty naturally occurring anino acids and/or
`their derivatives. The invention enables synthesis of
`these peptide mixtures with equal and precise
`representation of any anino acid residues at any
`position in the chain at which a mixture of anino acid
`residues is j.ntended to be represented. The process can
`use any type of peptide addition chenistry and
`protocols, but preferably uses the Merrifield soLid
`phase synthesis procedure in protocols sinrllar to that
`of the Houghten SMPS Process.
`In yet another aspect, the invention comprises
`a rnethod for tire identification of one or more optirnurn
`peptides for reaction with a designated acceptof, such
`
`t0
`
`L5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 15 of 249
`
`

`
`-13-
`
`that design of therapeutic naterials for treatnent of
`organism dysfunctions involving such receptor can be
`facilitated.
`In its broadest fotm, a process of this
`inventLon is defined aE a process for the synthesis of a
`complex mixture pool of solid support-coupled mononeric
`repeating unit cornpounds, wherein the nixture pool
`containE a substantially equlurolar representation of the
`reacted nonomeric repeating unit compound, such as amino
`acid residues, coupled at that step. In accordance with
`this method,
`(a) a plurality of Eo1id supports is
`provided, each solid support comprised of a particLe
`linked to reactive functionaL groups. The functional
`groups of the solid support react with a functional
`group of each of the monomeric repeating unit compounds
`to be reacted. In a preferred enbodinent, each of the
`solid supports is within a poroug container, the soLid
`support is of a size that is larger than the pores of
`the container, and both.the container and sol-id support
`are substantially insoluble in a liguid nediun used
`during the stePwise sYnthesis.
`'
`(b) A plurality of liquid media is provided'
`each medium containing a different monomeric repeating
`unit compound from a pJ.urality of rnononeric repeating
`unit compounds frorn which the oligomers are to be
`formed. Each of the nononeric repeating unit compounds
`has a first reactive functional group that reacts with
`the reactive functional group of the solid support and a
`second reactive functiona.l group that is capable of
`reacting during the reaction of the solid support
`functional group and the first reactive functional
`group, but is protected fron so reacting by a
`selectively removable, covalently Linked protecting
`group.
`,.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`t-5
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 16 of 249
`
`

`
`-14-
`(c) Each of the solid supports is placed in a
`different one of the liErid nedia and the reactive
`functional group of each solid support is therein
`reacted with a first reactive functional group of a
`monomeric repeating unit compound in that respective
`nedium to couple that rnonomeric repeating unit compound
`to the solid support.
`(d) Eash of the reactions iE nraintained for a
`tfune period and under conditions sufficient for all of
`the reactive functional groups of the solid support to
`coupl_e to the monomeric repeating unit compound to form
`a plurality of rnonorneric repeating uni.t-coupled solld
`supports.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`L5
`
`(e) Each monomeric repeating unit-coupled
`solid support is renoved fron its respective liquid
`medium, and equimolar amounts of each of the monomeric
`repeating unit-coupled solid eupports are adnixed to
`fotm a reaction product pooL, wherein equal weights of
`the formed pool contain the sane nurnber of moLes of each
`20 mononeric repeating unit-coupled solid support.
`The above nixture pool is useful in a stepwise
`synthesis f,or preparing a complex niv:tu.'e of solid
`support-coupled oligoners wherein one or more positions
`of each oligoner of the rnixture contalnE an equinolar
`representation of reacted monomeric repeating unit
`compound coupled at each synthesis step. If desired,
`the pool forned in step (e) can be used for further
`steps (1)-(o) as discussed in regard to synthesi-s of an
`oligopeptide hereinafter. However, in usual practice,
`steps (f)-(k) are utilized, as discussed below.
`(f) The reaction product pool is separated
`into a nurnber of aliquots of egual weight. Each of the
`aliquots is enclosed in another porous containeq, where
`such preferred containers are used.
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`Page 17 of 249
`
`

`
`-15-
`
`(g) The protecting groups are selectively
`removed fron the second reactive functional groups of
`the pool to forn a reacted solid support pool having
`free reactive functional groups. ThiE step is
`preferably carried out after the pool, is formed into
`aliquots and those aliquots are re-encLosed, but can be
`carried out prLor to forming the aliquots' and re-
`enclosure is not used where porous containers are not
`used.
`
`(h) Each of the aliquots having free reactive
`functional groupE is placed into one of a nunber of
`J.iquid rnedia, each urediurn containing a different
`rnonomeric repeating unit conpound from a plurality of
`monomeric repeating unit compounds from which the
`oligonrers are to be forted to form a reaction mixture,
`whereLn each of the rnononeric repeatlng unit compounds
`has a first reactive functlonal. group that reacts in the
`reaction mixture with the free reactive groups of the
`aliquot and a second reactive functional group that is
`capable of reacting during the reastion of the free
`reactive functional groups of the aLiquot, but is
`protected fron Eo reacting by .i selectively removable,
`covalently linked protecting {ioup.
`(i) Each of the reactions is naintained for a
`time period and under conditions Eufficient for aII of
`the free reactive functional groupE of the aliquots to
`react with and couple to the respective nononeric
`repeating unlt compounds to form a nurnber of solid
`support-coupled repeating unit reaction products.
`(j) Each of the solid support-coupled
`repeating unit reactlon.products for:rred is removed, and'
`equinolar anount,s of each of thoEe reaction products are
`adnrixed to fonn a reaction product pooJ.. Egual yeights
`of the reaction product pool contain the same number of
`noles of each reaction product.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`Page 18 of 249
`
`

`
`-16-
`
`(k) Thereafter, steps (f) through (j) are
`serially.repeated zero or more tirnes until a plurality
`of solid support-coupled reaction products havlng the
`desired nunber of monomeric repeating units is
`synthesized.
`The resulting complex nLxture of oligomers
`contains an equinolar nixture of the plurality of
`monomeric repeatlng unit conpounds at every
`predetenrined position in the chain. The eguirnolarity
`is only lirnited by the accuracy in driving the reactions
`to conpletion and weighing errors in separatlng the
`substantially homogeneously urixed resins into equal
`aliquots.
`
`fn a preferred form, the process of-this
`invention is defined as a ppocess for the synthesis of a
`conplex nixture pool of solid support-coupled amino acid
`residues wherein the rnixture contains an equinolar
`representation of the anino acid residues coupled.
`Here, the preferred enbodiment of u

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket