throbber
ANALYTICAL
`
`BIOCHEMISTRY
`
`67, 317-35’
`
`(1975)
`
`of Submicrogram
`Quantitation
`Using Coomassie
`Brilliant
`Dodecyl
`Sulfate-Polyacrylamide
`
`of Protein
`Amounts
`Blue R on
`Slab-Gels
`
`Sodium
`
`slab-gel system was used to
`A sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide
`study the use of Coomassie brilliant blue (CB) as a quantitative stain. Quantita-
`tion curves are shown
`for tubulin, cytochrome c, histone, and actin from gels
`stained with CB. A comparison was made of three identical gels using an actin
`sample and stained with CB, fast green and buffalo black. CB staining was found
`to be quantitative
`in the 0.05-2.75pg
`range as well as possessing an order of
`magnitude
`increase in sensitivity over other stains tested.
`
`elec-
`polyacrylamide-gel
`in quantitative
`the recent work
`Much of
`(PAGE)
`is concerned with
`the stains and staining proce-
`trophoresis
`dures. Some of the different stains used are fast green (l), amido black
`(2), and Coomassie brilliant
`blue (CB) (3). In most cases only a small
`percentage of the dye ever binds to protein. This prompted Datyner and
`Finnimore
`(4) to develop a method
`in which stain and protein are mixed
`under conditions
`favorable
`to
`the formation
`of covalent bonds before
`electrophoresis.
`They report a sensitivity down to 0.2 pg with some pro-
`teins. Another method, employed by Watkin and Miller
`(5), attempts
`to
`avoid
`the problems
`inherent
`in the use of dyes and staining by scanning
`gels immediately
`after electrophoresis
`under uv light at 280 nm. How-
`ever, as is aptly pointed out (5), the problem of variable affinity
`for stain
`is exchanged
`for one of different
`relative absorbancies of light at 280 nm.
`While CB is held by most workers
`to be the most sensitive dye avail-
`able,
`there has been some doubt as to its value as a quantitative
`dye.
`Fishbein
`(3) has shown
`that CB could be quantitated
`in the
`l-22-pg
`range. The major complaint
`against
`the use of CB as a quantitatively
`staining dye is that it shows deviation
`from Beer’s Law at lower protein
`concentrations
`than the other dyes.
`to various proteins
`In this study CB was shown to bind quantitatively
`at submicrogram
`concentrations
`not previously
`reported. The
`impor-
`tance of the appropriate
`slab-gel system
`is also emphasized.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Gels. The polyacrylamide
`thin (16 X 12 X 0.08 cm) slab-gel system of
`Laemmli
`(6) and O’Farrell
`et al. (7) was used, giving gels with an
`acrylamide
`concentration
`of 12% and a sodium dodecyl sulfate
`(SDS)
`
`Copyright @ 1975 by Academic
`All
`rights of reproduction
`in any
`
`Press.
`form
`
`Inc.
`reserved.
`
`347
`
`GNE 2006
`Page 1
`
`

`
`348
`
`SHORT
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`than 72 nor less
`the spacer gel and
`
`of 0.1%. Gels were made up no more
`concentration
`than 12 hr before use and were run at 10 mA
`through
`15 mA once into
`the lower gel.
`lot
`Chemical,
`(Sigma
`blue R
`Staining.
`Coomassie
`brilliant
`and
`#23C-0950),
`fast green FCF
`(Sigma Chemical,
`lot #7OC-0580),
`buffalo black NBR
`(Allied Chemical,
`lot #7OC-0580) were used at a
`concentration
`of 0.1%
`in 25%
`trichloroacetic
`acid (TCA). Destaining
`took 2-3 days employing
`changes of 8% acetic acid. Gels were consid-
`ered completely
`destained when there was no visible background
`stain
`remaining
`in the gel.
`10%
`Samples. All proteins were made up in a sample buffer containing
`glycerol, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol,
`2% SDS, 8 M urea, 0.0625 M Tris, pH
`6.8 with HCl.
`Histone
`from
`calf
`thymus
`(Sigma Chemical,
`lot
`#6OC-2650) was prepared as a 1 mg/ml
`solution
`in sample buffer. Other
`samples
`included
`cytochrome
`c (horse heart, Sigma Chemical,
`lot
`#6OC-2650) made up to 0.02 mg/ml,
`tubulin purified by vinblastine
`pre-
`cipitation
`at a concentration
`of 0.012 mg/ml, and rabbit muscle actin,
`diluted
`to a final concentration
`of 0.025 mg/ml.
`Quantitation.
`The stained bands were cut out of the slab gels using a
`razor blade and placed along
`the inside wall of a Gilford 24 12 rectangu-
`lar cuvette
`to which
`they adhered. Fresh,
`filtered 8% acetic acid was
`used to fill
`the cuvette
`in all work reported. The gels were scanned at
`590 nm (red) with
`the use of a Gilford 240 spectrophotometer
`with a
`grid slit plate 2.36 x 0.05 mm and a slit width of 0.36 mm. Graphs were
`made by using a Gilson
`linear
`transport apparatus
`to move
`the gels past
`the spectrophotometer
`beam at the slowest scan speed (0.5 cmlmin) and
`recorded on a Texas
`Instruments
`chart
`recorder at a speed of 7.6
`cmlmin.
`of 13 samples. No attempt was
`Each gel had spaces for a maximum
`made to compare
`results from different gels. Four readings were taken of
`each gel as follows: The gel was read, flipped over and read again, a thin
`slice was taken off lengthwise and the gel was read again, and a second
`lengthwise slice was taken off for the fourth reading. This gave four dis-
`tinct points on the protein band which were read and quantitated.
`The
`number of readings was later reduced
`to two per sample. The means of
`the areas under
`the peaks, determined
`by weighing on a Mettler balance,
`of the readings
`for each sample were then taken as a quantitative
`value.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`tissue homogenates
`of either pure proteins or whole
`Electrophoresis
`gels proved
`to be of insufficient
`sensitivity,
`particularly
`using cylindrical
`when compared with that of the slab-gel system. Three
`to five times
`the
`amount of protein
`is required when using a cylindrical
`(7-mm diameter)
`
`GNE 2006
`Page 2
`
`

`
`SHORT
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`349
`
`.2
`
`.
`
`5
`
`2s
`z
`0
`
`.40-
`
`.35-
`
`.30-
`
`.25-
`
`.20-
`
`.15-
`
`.lO-
`
`OS-
`
`r
`
`I
`I
`I
`5
`10
`15
`Sample
`Volume
`(k.l)
`of four different proteins (tubulin. 0.012 pg/wl; actin, 0.025 /.~g//.~l;
`1. Quantitation
`FIG.
`cytochrome c, 0.02 pg/pl, and histone) at four sample volumes. Means and ranges are
`shown for each point.
`
`I
`20
`
`the greatest
`gel due to the greater volume of the gel matrix. However,
`problem
`in using cylindrical
`gels was found
`to be in the staining.
`It was
`found
`that the stain does not penetrate
`the cylindrical
`gels uniformly
`or
`completely
`and thus could not be used for quantitative
`purposes. Pene-
`tration of the dye throughout
`the gel can be checked by slicing
`the gel
`with a razor blade
`in the middle of a peak and looking
`to see if the stain
`has penetrated
`to the center. When
`the penetration
`is incomplete
`there is
`a ring of stain with a clear center. Staining procedures were varied
`in ef-
`forts to get complete
`staining, but
`this was never achieved with cylin-
`drical gels even after 2 days of staining or with
`the use of acetic acid,
`methanol,
`or trichloroacetic
`acid solutions. However,
`it was discovered
`that staining
`for 30 min.
`in a 0.1% CB solution
`in 25% TCA was suf-
`ficient
`for complete,
`uniform
`staining of a slab gel. When destained
`in
`7-10%
`acetic acid,
`there
`is no spreading of bands and only gradual
`fading of intensity of bands due to leaching of the dye.
`
`GNE 2006
`Page 3
`
`

`
`350
`
`SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
`
`.9 0
`
`.60
`
`.70
`
`.60
`
`.50
`
`.40
`
`30
`
`.20
`
`.lO
`
`M
`
`.'
`. 5
`
`AZ
`
`:
`n.
`
`0
`
`5
`0:o
`
`I
`.25
`
`I
`.50
`
`I
`.7 5
`
`8
`1.0
`
`I
`1.25
`
`g Actin
`u
`In each
`FIG. 3. Ten actin samples were made up with different protein concentrations.
`case the same sample volume (10 ~1) is used to give concentrations
`from 0.05-1.X
`pg.
`This graph represents one gel.
`
`in amino acid
`A variety of proteins were chosen to reflect differences
`composition,
`net charge, and molecular weight. The data are shown (Fig.
`1) for a histone protein
`(R,, 0.591),
`tubulin, actin, and cytochrome
`c. It is
`noted
`that in most of these graphs at the greatest sample volume
`(20 ~1)
`the value
`is slightly
`higher
`than
`that predicted
`from
`the
`line drawn
`through
`the other points. This was thought
`to be due to the increase
`in
`sample volume
`rather
`than a real deviation
`resulting
`from staining. This
`is supported
`by results shown
`in Fig. 2 in which
`ten different actin
`samples were prepared
`in different concentrations
`so that, when put on
`the gel, the same sample volume of 10 ~1 was used but different amounts
`of protein were in each sample
`(0.25-1.25
`pg).
`
`GNE 2006
`Page 4
`
`

`
`3.51
`
`SHORT
`
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`040
`
`Black
`Green
`. Fast
`0 Coommassie
`
`I o Buffalo
`
`Blue
`
`Volume
`(~4 L)
`FIG. 3. Results of quantitation of three actin gels, identical
`the stain employed.
`
`in every respect. except fol
`
`fast green and buffalo
`of CB,
`the sensitivities
`Figure 3 illustrates
`the values from
`the CB-stained
`black. At the same protein concentration
`greater
`than peaks
`from gels
`gel are almost an order of magnitude
`stained with either
`fast green or buffalo black. The
`lowest amount of
`protein quantitated was 0.05 pg and could easily be seen by the eye. The
`greatest amount quantitated was 2.75 pg per band. We were thus able to
`quantitate protein bands with almost a hundred-fold
`range of sensitivity.
`Fishbein
`reports a range of I-55 pg which probably
`reflects differences
`in the sensitivity of the spectrophotometer
`used in quantitating.
`It should
`be noted
`that with different
`instrumentation
`it should be possible
`to shift
`the range of concentrations which are quantitatable with the use of CB.
`The utility of such a technique
`is perhaps best found
`in cellular and
`molecular
`research rather
`than as a strictly analytical method such as the
`Lowry protein determination.
`The ability of PAGE
`to separate proteins
`
`GNE 2006
`Page 5
`
`

`
`352
`
`SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
`
`them on a submicrogram
`and quantitate
`any other existing methodology.
`
`scale cannot be approached by
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Gorovsky, M. A., Carlson. K., and Rosenbaum, J. L. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 35,
`359-370.
`2. Kruski, A. W., and Narayan, K. A. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 168, 570-572.
`3. Fishbein, W. N. (1972) Anal. Biochem. 46, 388-401.
`4. Datyner, A., and Finnimore, E. D. (1973) Anal. Biochem. 55, 479-491.
`5. Watkin, J. E., and Miller, R. A. (1970) Anal. Biochem. 34, 424-435.
`6. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature
`(London) 227, 680-685.
`7. O’FarrelI, P. Z., Gold, L. M.. and Huang, W. M.,
`5499-5501.
`
`(1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248,
`
`KAHN
`RICHARD
`ROBERT W. RUBIN
`
`Division of Natural Sciences
`New College
`Sarasota, Florida 33578
`Received August 26, 1974; accepted March 3. 1975
`
`GNE 2006
`Page 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket